Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 17;10:9811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66819-8

Advanced characterization of surface-modified nanoparticles and nanofilled antibacterial dental adhesive resins

Fernando Luis Esteban Florez 1,, Artem A Trofimov 2, Anton Ievlev 2, Shuo Qian 3, Adam Justin Rondinone 2, Sharukh Soli Khajotia 1
PMCID: PMC7299952  PMID: 32555360

Abstract

Nanotechnology can improve the performance of dental polymers. The objective of this study was to modify the surfaces of nanoparticles with silanes and proteins, characterize nanoparticles’ agglomeration levels and interfaces between nanoparticles and the polymeric matrix. Undoped (n-TiO2), nitrogen-doped (N_TiO2) and nitrogen-fluorine co-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles (NF_TiO2) were synthesized and subjected to surface modification procedures in preparation for Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) characterizations. Experimental adhesives were manually synthesized by incorporating 20% (v/v) of n-TiO2, N_TiO2 or NF_TiO2 (as-synthesized or surface-modified) into OptiBond Solo Plus (OPTB). Specimens (n = 15/group; d = 6.0 mm, t = 0.5 mm) of OPTB and experimental adhesives were characterized using Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS), 2-D ToF-SIMS chemical imaging and SANS. SAXS results indicated that surface-modified nanoparticles displayed higher scattering intensities in a particle-size dependent manner. ToF-SIMS results demonstrated that nanoparticles’ incorporation did not adversely impact the parental polymer. 2-D ToF-SIMS chemical imaging demonstrated the distribution of Ti+ and confirmed nitrogen-doping levels. SANS results confirmed nanoparticles’ functionalization and revealed the interfaces between nanoparticles and the polymer matrix. Metaloxide nanoparticles were successfully fabricated, incorporated and covalently functionalized in a commercial dental adhesive resin, thereby supporting the utilization of nanotechnology in dentistry.

Subject terms: Dentistry, Dental materials, Dental biomaterials, Health care, Materials science

Introduction

The placement of polymer-based adhesive restorations is one of the most prevalent medical interventions in the human body with more than five hundred million composite restorations placed every year1. Resin composite restorations became the first treatment option amongst patients and clinicians around the world due to their outstanding esthetic properties, mercury-free compositions and ultraconservative restorative techniques2. Despite their high acceptability and widespread use, these materials have been correlated with significant clinical shortcomings including postoperative sensitivity, shorter service lives (5.7 years) and higher incidences of failure when compared to dental amalgams. The reduced longevity observed has been attributed to a combination of factors including polymerization shrinkage, incomplete enveloping of the dentin matrix and biodegradation. This problem is exacerbated on resin composites and dental adhesive resins, because these materials were demonstrated to upregulate the aggregation and growth of oral microorganisms, and biofilms accumulated, are typically more cariogenic in nature3.

Furthermore, it has been suggested that the interface between synthetic and biological materials plays a vital role in shifting the microbial ecology from a state of health into a disease-associated state4. This shift leads to chronic chemical and biological degradation of the tooth-adhesive-resin composite interface and, ultimately, to secondary caries5. The occurrence of this biofilm-related disease at the adhesive-tooth interface has consistently been the primary mechanism for failure and replacement of resin composite restorations6. It is estimated that a total of $ 298 billion are spent globally every year for the replacement of failed restorations, which is a heavy economic burden for patients and governments, and represents an average of 4.6% of the total global health-care related expenditures7.

Several groups have tried to increase the service lives of bonded restorations by adding inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (zinc-dependent endopeptidases, MMP), antibacterial agents and monomers to current polymer compositions8. Experimental materials containing quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC) or quaternary ammonium dimethacrylates (QAM) were previously shown to display promising functionalities (in vitro and in vivo) against a broad variety of oral microorganisms and MMP911. A recent systematic review of the literature12 has indicated that the incorporation of QAMs may impact the structure of the polymeric network, degree of conversion, solvent sorption (e.g., water, ethanol and artificial saliva), polymerization shrinkage and may significantly change the biocompatibility of experimental materials against fibroblast cells12. Another study has demonstrated that saliva adversely impacts the antibacterial activity of QAC-containing materials due to electrostatic interactions between salivary proteins and QAC13.

Approaches to improve the antibacterial functionalities of dental polymers include the utilization of functionalized quaternary ammonium polyethyleneimine nanoparticles (QPEI)14. Even though such approach was demonstrated to result in promising initial antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans, the excess iodine attached to these highly cross-linked silica-based nanoparticles, was shown to adversely impact free-radical polymerization reactions, which inevitably led to experimental materials with low degree of polymerization, reduced mechanical properties and leaching of uncured monomers15. Another study has demonstrated that pyrogenic silica nanofillers undergo hydrolytic degradation within the hybrid layer independently of the level of silane functionalization16. Nanofillers’ dissolution within the hybrid layer was shown to result in the formation of water channels, higher water uptake, leaching of unbound hydrophilic components, and to further accelerate hybrid layer’s hydrolytic degradation16.

The UV-driven photocatalysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (n-TiO2) was previously shown to be effective against microorganisms relevant to public health such as bacteria (Gram-positive and Gram-negative) and viruses17. However, the energy dose required to achieve adequate sterilization are at levels extremely dangerous to human cells and tissues18, which significantly restricts the utilization of this technology in dentistry. Several studies1925 have demonstrated the feasibility of shifting the n-TiO2 absorption behavior from the UV (200–390 nm) into the visible range (400–700 nm) of the electromagnetic spectrum by doping n-TiO2 with a variety of atoms including nitrogen, fluorine, copper, silver, platinum and palladium. More recently, Esteban Florez et al.26 investigated the antibacterial efficacy of highly photoactive N_TiO2 (size distribution 6–15 nm) synthesized by robust solvothermal reactions27,28. The results reported26 have indicated that experimental dental adhesive resins containing varying concentrations of N_TiO2 (50%, 67% or 80% [v/v]) displayed superior antibacterial properties against S. mutans biofilms (3 and 24 hours) when compared to the parental polymer in both light-irradiated and dark conditions. Despite these promising results, it is well known that the incorporation of non-functionalized nanoparticles into polymers leads to the attainment of experimental materials with inferior surface, mechanical and biological properties (germicidal, bioactivity and biocompatibility)29.

Consequently, surface-modification and covalent functionalization of nanoparticles is required to fabricate the state-of-the-art nanostructured composites with specific architectures, functionalities and superior mechanical, surface, chemical, physical and biological properties. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to synthesize, surface-modify, functionalize and comprehensively characterize undoped (n-TiO2), doped (nitrogen, N_TiO2) and co-doped (nitrogen and fluorine [NF_TiO2]) titanium dioxide nanoparticles, as well as, unaltered or experimental dental adhesive resins modified by the incorporation of 20% (v/v) of the metaloxide nanoparticles synthesized.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of nanoparticles

The detailed description of the synthesis of n-TiO2 or N_TiO2 used in the present study has been reported previously in a recent publication from our laboratory26. Nanoparticles were synthesized (at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences; CNMS) in two steps using very controllable solvothermal reactions27,28. In the first step a solution of 1.7 g of Ti(OBu)4 (Aldrich, 97%), 4.6 g C2H5OH (Decon Labs, 200 proof), 6.8 g C18H35NH2 (Aldrich, 70%), 7.1 g C18H34O2 (Aldrich, 90%) was prepared and then mixed with an ethanol-water solution (4%, 18-Milli-Q; total volume = 20 mL/aliquot). Solutions prepared were transparent before mixing, however, the final solution clouded instantaneously after mixing due to hydrolysis and some micelle formation. Aliquots (20 mL/each) of the final solution were individually placed into separate high-pressure reaction vessels (Teflon-lined; Paar Series 5000, Multiple Reactor System), reacted (180 °C, 24 hours) and stirred via external magnetic field (280 rpm). Room-temperature solutions were then decanted and washed (3×, ethanol 200 proof, Decon Labs) to render pure n-TiO2. A portion of n-TiO2 in ethanol were then reacted (at 140 °C, 12 hours) with an equal volume of triethylamine (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.5%). The now nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles (N_TiO2) was then washed 3 additional times with ethanol, and the concentration of particles was gravimetrically determined to be approximately 40 mg/mL. Co-doped nanoparticles (NF_TiO2) were obtained in a single reaction based on step 1 with the inclusion of 5% (wt./wt.; based on Ti content) of fluorine using crystalline Ammonium Fluoride (ACS, 98%, Alfa Aesar) as the dopant source. Aliquots (10 mL/group) of the as-synthesized nanoparticles were re-suspended in deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.9 atom %, Sigma-Aldrich) in preparation for small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering experiments.

Surface modification of nanoparticles

As-synthesized nanoparticles (n-TiO2, N_TiO2, or NF_TiO2; ≅ 40 mg/mL) suspended in ethanol (20 mL/each) were washed (ultrapure water, 18-Milli-Q, 3 washes, 1 min/wash; 25 °C), centrifuged (8,000 rpm; 3 cycles of 15 min/each) and suspended in a pre-heated sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH, 60 °C, 15 M). Ionic solutions containing the nanoparticles were then incubated (30 min) in an orbital shaker (100 rpm) at room-temperature. Aliquots (10 mL) of NaOH-modified nanoparticles were then centrifuged (8,000 rpm; 3 cycles of 15 min/each) and re-suspended in 20 mL of (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES; 85.5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, 99%) at 90 °C for 3 hours (static conditions). Nanoparticles that were surface-modified by NAOH + APTES were then washed and centrifuged as previously described. Silanized nanoparticles were re-suspended in a buffered aqueous solution of human serum albumin (Alb; 10 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99%,10% buffer) at room-temperature for 24 hours (100 rpm). Surface-modified nanoparticles (either by NaOH, APTES or Alb; or a combination thereof) were denoted as Dn-TiO2, DN_TiO2 or DNF_TiO2 (where D stands for any type of surface derivatization).

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Aliquots (10 mL) of the as-synthesized (N_TiO2) or surface-modified (DN_TiO2) nanoparticles were re-suspended in deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.9 atom %, Sigma-Aldrich) containing either NaCl (0.1 M or 1.0 M) or HCl (0.1 M). Aliquots (1.0 mL) of each nanoparticle investigated (either as-synthesized or surface-modified) were then individually placed into separate wells of a disposable plastic sample holder. The SAXS experiment was then performed (8 hours irradiation/sample; 3 samples/group) on a Rigaku BioSAXS-2000 system with a rotating anode, producing CuKα X-ray radiation at 1.54 Å. SAXS, data was averaged and reduced using Rigaku SAXSlab data collection and processing software (V4.0.2 Rigaku Americas Corporation).

Dental adhesive resins and specimen fabrication

Experimental dental adhesive resins were synthesized by manually dispersing 20% (v/v) of as-synthesized (n-TiO2, N_TiO2 or NF_TiO2) or surface-modified (Dn-TiO2, DN_TiO2 or DNF_TiO2) nanoparticles (in ethanol) into OptiBond Solo Plus (Kerr Corp.; OPTB; Composition: Self-etch primer - HFGA-GMA, GPDM, ethanol, water, MEHQ, ODMAB, CQ SE primer: 1.9; Light-cured Adhesive -Bis-GMA, HEMA, GDMA, GPDM, ethanol, CQ, ODMAB, BHT, filler (fumed SiO2, barium aluminoborosilicate, Na2SiF6), coupling factor A174 [approximately 15 wt% filled]). Disk shaped specimens (n = 15/group; diameter = 6.0 mm, thickness = 0.5 mm) of OPTB or experimental dental adhesive resins (OPTB + 20% [v/v] of either n-TiO2, N_TiO2, NF_TiO2 or Dn-TiO2, DN_TiO2, DNF_TiO2) were fabricated by individually pouring uncured materials into the separate wells of a custom-made metallic mold. Specimens were then light-cured with blue light (VALO LED, Ultradent Products, Inc., U.S.A.) from the top (1,000 mW/cm2 60 s/each) following a protocol previously reported26.

Helium ion microscopy (HIM)

A helium ion microscope (Zeiss Orion Nanofab) was utilized for the secondary electron imaging of specimens. Helium ion microscopy (HIM), enabled by a gas field ion source (GFIS), is a powerful imaging and nanofabrication technique compatible with many applications in materials science3032. HIM offers small interaction volume of He and Ne (the two gases offered), small beam spot size, and a moderate sputtering rate33,34. Generally, helium allows higher resolution work, whereas neon offers milling opportunities. Additionally, the HIM can provide sharp, well resolved images from electrically insulating samples (soft, polymeric, and biological materials) without a conductive coating due to its charge compensation capabilities32,35,36. In the present study, specimens of each dental adhesive resin investigated were loaded into the vacuum chamber of the HIM at a pressure of ca. 2.5 × 10−7 Torr, and GFIS gun pressure was ca. 2 × 10−6 Torr. HIM imaging was performed using a focused He+ beam with an extraction voltage of 34 kV and acceleration voltage of 25 kV over a range of fields of view (FOV; 2 μm2–100 μm2). The beam current for imaging was measured as ca. 1.65 pA at a beam spot size of 4 μm and a 5 μm gold aperture. Imaging was done for 200 μs per pixel dwell time over 1,024 × 1,024 pixels.

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS)

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry measurements were carried out using TOF.SIMS.5-NSC instrument (ION-TOF Gmb, Germany) and allowed the surface chemistry characterization of investigated specimens fabricated with unaltered or experimental dental adhesive resins. In ToF-SIMS primary ion beam of Bi3+ clusters with energy of 30 keV, current 30 nA and beam size ~5 μm was used to extract analyte ions from the surface of each specimen. Secondary ions were further accelerated in uniform electric field and moved to the detector. Their time-of-flight was measured and allowed the calculation of mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) and the plotting of full mass spectra. This way ToF-SIMS allowed 2-dimmensional chemical imaging of the surface chemistry with mass resolution m/Δm = 5,000–10,000 and spatial resolution ~5 μm.

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS)

Nanoparticles (as-synthesized or surface-modified) or specimens fabricated with dental adhesive resins (unaltered or experimental) were individually placed inside of customized titanium cells. Each titanium cell (containing nanoparticles suspended in D2O or dry specimens) had two quartz windows to allow the transmission of neutrons through the specimens or samples investigated. These titanium cells were then individually mounted onto a custom-made and computer-controlled holder (capacity = 8 cells/experiment) that allowed the continuous rotation (20 rpm) of individual cells during SANS measurements. The rotation prevented nanoparticles from settling down in suspension. The SANS experiment was performed (3 hours/sample or specimen) at the Bio-SANS instrument of the High-Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, following a protocol previously described37. The sample-to-detector distance was set to 15.5 m (main detector) and 1.13 m (wing detector) at a wavelength of 6 Å with the wavelength spread ∆λ/λ ~ 0.15. The available q range was 0.003 < q < 0.8 Å−1, where q = ((4π sinθ)⁄λ), and 2θ as the scattering angle. A sample aperture of 12.0 mm diameter was used for providing a sufficient neutron scattering intensity. Raw SANS data were corrected for sample transmission and background radiation by facility supplied reduction software. SANS measurements were taken at room temperature. Data analysis was performed in SASView software (National Science Foundation, DANSE project). A generalized Guinier-Porod function (GPF) was used to fit experimental data of dental adhesive resins (unaltered or experimental) containing 20% (v/v) of nanoparticles (as-synthesized or surface-modified) according to Eq. 1 by Hammouda38.

I(Q)=GQsexpQ2Rg23s 1

where (G) is a scaling factor, (Rg) is the radius of gyration and (s) is a parameter used to model three-dimensional globular objects (e.g., spheres or nanoparticles investigated).

Results

Figure 1(A–D) shows the surface characterization results using HIM (field of view = 25 μm2) of unaltered (1 A, OPTB) and experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% (v/v) of Dn-TiO2 (1B), DN_TiO2 (1 C) or DNF_TiO2 (1D), respectively. Experimental adhesives were demonstrated to display topographical features that were comparable to those of OPTB, and phase separation (between nanoparticles and polymer) could not be observed (at the surface level) for all groups investigated. These findings suggest that nanoparticles (as-synthesized or surface-modified) were successfully incorporated and functionalized in the organic matrix of OPTB. In addition, it is possible to observe that surfaces investigated were dominated by the presence of micron-sized particles. This finding can be fully explained by the composition of OPTB, where salinized silica particles are used as fillers to improve the mechanical properties of OPTB.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Helium-Ion Microscopy. Images (25 μm field of view) of unaltered (A) and experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% (v/v) of (B) n-TiO2, (C) N_TiO2 and (D) NF_TiO2.

Figure 2(A,B) illustrate the SAXS results for surface-modified N_TiO2 suspended in deuterium oxide (D2O) or D2O containing NaCl (0.1 M or 1.0 M) or HCl (0.1 M). Figure 2A clearly shows that for small values of q (between 0.01 and 0.1 Å−1), X-ray scattering intensities of surface-modified N_TiO2 varied in a particle-size dependent manner where NaOH+APTES + Alb > NaOH+APTES > NaOH. For larger values of q (between 0.1 and 1.0 Å−1), X-Ray scatterings indicated that surface-modified nanoparticles tend to agglomerate more when compared to as-synthesized nanoparticles. Figure 2B illustrates the impact of the utilization of deuterated ionic solutions (NaCl or HCl) on the agglomeration behavior of surface-modified nanoparticles, where it can be observed that surface-modified nanoparticles suspended in acidic media (HCl 0.1 M) displayed the best isotropic X-ray scattering behavior amongst all experimental groups investigated (green curve). These findings indicate that acidic deuterated solutions displayed large quantities of discrete particles (individually distributed) and small-sized agglomerates (15–45 nm in diameter).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results from the small-angle X-ray spectroscopy of surface-modified nanoparticles suspended on D2O. (A) shows the effect of surface modification (either NaOH, NaOH+APTES or NaOH+APTES + Alb) and (B) the effect of ionic solutions (either NaCl [0.1 M] or HCl [0.1 M]) on nanoparticles’ agglomeration levels.

Figure 3 illustrates the ToF-SIMS results of OPTB and experimental adhesives containing 20% (v/v) of as-synthesized and surface-modified nanoparticles, where experimental adhesives displayed mass spectra that were comparable to that of OPTB, thereby supporting that the incorporation of nanoparticles investigated did not adversely impacted the organic matrix of OPTB. Figure 4(A–E) illustrates the results of the 2-D ToF-SIMS chemical imaging (FOV = 50 μm2) denoting the distribution of titanium (Ti+) within OPTB (A) and experimental adhesives containing 20% (v/v) of n-TiO2 (B), N_TiO2 (C) or NF_TiO2 (D). It can be observed (Fig. 4C) that specimens containing 20% (v/v) of N_TiO2 displayed the highest concentrations of Ti+. The results shown in Fig. 4E (for m/z between 61.86 and 62.04) not only confirm the findings from the 2-D chemical mapping, but also represents the first instance in dentistry, in which nitrogen-doping is mapped within the crystal lattice of titanium dioxide nanoparticles while immobilized in a commercial adhesive resin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ToF-SIMS of unaltered (OPTB) and experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% of either n-TiO2, N_TiO2 or NF_TiO2 (A) as-synthesized or (B) surface-modified by NaOH + APTES + Alb. From top to bottom in (A) and (B) OPTB, OPTB + n-TiO2, OPTB + N_TiO2 and OPTB + NF_TiO2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ToF-SIMS chemical imaging for Ti+ immobilized in (A) OPTB, (B) OPTB + n-TiO2, (C) OPTB + N_TiO2 and (D) N_F_TiO2. Mass spectrum analysis for TiN+ is shown in (E).

Figure 5(A–C) shows the SANS results for (A) N_TiO2 (as-synthesized or surface modified) suspended in D2O (with or without HCl [0.1 M]) or (B) dental adhesive resins (unaltered or experimental) containing 20% of nanoparticles (as-synthesized or surface-modified). The results reported in Fig. 5A indicate that, for small values of q (Å−1), nanoparticles investigated could be rank ordered in terms of their sizes and agglomeration levels, as follows: N_TiO2 > DN_TiO2 (NaOH+APTES + Alb)> DN_TiO2 (NaOH+APTES) > DN_TiO2 (NaOH+APTES + Alb in HCl [0.1 M]). Figure 5B illustrate SANS results for OPTB and experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% (v/v) of either as-synthesized or surface-modified nanoparticles. Figure 5C illustrates the Guinier-Porod fitting of OPTB. Table 1 illustrates the results for all dental adhesive resins analyzed with SANS. The results in Table 1 were used to determine the morphology, size (s), radius of gyration (Rg) of scattering objects and the types of interfaces established between nanoparticles and polymeric chains (Porod exponential). It is possible to observe that radius of gyration (in terms of Å) and thickness (in nm) of polymeric chains ranged from 134.99 (N_TiO2) to 145.16 (Dn-TiO2), and from 46.7 (N_TiO2) to 50.22 (Dn-TiO2), respectively. The results of the s parameter and the Porod exponential (which indicates fractal surface, Table 1) demonstrated the presence of small-sized aggregates (15–50 nm) displaying platelet structures and the establishment of a smooth interface between nanoparticles and the polymeric chains, which indicates the establishment of covalent functionalization of nanoparticles in OPTB.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Results from the small-angle neutron scattering of (A) N_TiO2 (as-synthesized or surface-modified) suspended in D2O or D2O containing 0.1 M HCl, (B) unaltered and experimental dental adhesive resins containing either as-synthesized or surface-modified n-TiO2, N_TiO2 and NF_TiO2 and (C) Representative Guinier-Porod fitting unaltered OPTB.

Table 1.

Small Angle Neutron Scattering results illustrating the radius of gyration, polymeric chain thicknesses and Porod exponentials for unaltered and experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% (v/v) of nanoparticles (either doped or co-doped; as-synthesized or surface-modified).

Groups Radius of Gyration (Å) Thickness (nm) Porod Exponential Background Scale Factor
OPTB 142.05 49.2 3.7 0.28 0.039
TiO2 139.37 48.3 3.7 0.29 0.025
TiO2_APTES_ALB 145.16 50.2 3.7 0.24 0.042
N_TiO2 134.99 46.7 3.7 0.25 0.022
N_TiO2_APTES_ALB 140.40 48.6 3.7 0.28 0.035
NF_TiO2 143.20 49.5 3.7 0.32 0.039
NF_TiO2_APTES_ALB 136.9 47.1 3.7 0.32 0.025

Discussion

Approaches to develop second-generation visible light-responsive TiO2 nano-catalysts using lanthanide metals (La3+, Eu3+, ND3+, Ce4+) and high calcination temperatures have been previously described3941. Xu et al.42 while investigating a simple route for the preparation of co-doped nanoparticles (NEu_TiO2) indicated, based on previous scientific evidence43, that traditional calcination approaches results in thermally unstable nanoparticles with reduced surface-to-volume ratios and OH-deficient surfaces.

These factors combined may be translated into nanoparticles requiring multiple functionalization steps and are associated with inferior photocatalytic properties.

Asahi et al.44 demonstrated that doping titania with non-metal elements, such as nitrogen, narrows the band-gap of TiO2 by inserting an intermediary p state from nitrogen between the oxygen 2p states, which extends titania’s optical absorption edge into the visible spectrum (400–750 nm). Despite these promising reports, subsequent studies45,46 suggested that N_TiO2 translation into practical applications would be restricted due to its deficient reactivity and poor quantum yield. In addition to that, Liu et al.45 indicated that the artificial lacuna created during the doping process, could negatively impact nanoparticles’ long-term photocatalysis stability.

In the present study undoped (n-TiO2), doped (N_TiO2) and co-doped (NF_TiO2) variations of nanoparticles were synthesized using robust and highly controllable solvothermal reactions. According to Huo et al.27, this synthesis route yields pure and crystalline TiO2 (anatase phase) displaying high levels of nitrogen-doping47 in the TiO2 network (N/Ti molar ratio = 3.4%) when compared to traditional calcination strategies (N/Ti molar ratio = 1.3%). The results reported by Huo et al.27 have indicated that nanoparticles fabricated using solvothermal reactions are in fact electron deficient, facilitate the production of electron-hole pairs (by photoinduced processes), display enhanced absorbance of visible light26, and consequently, are capable of generating substantial amounts of reactive oxygen species.

According to Bidlack et al.48 HIM can be used for the characterization of non-sputter-coated biological samples (soft and insulating) with nanometric resolution and outstanding depth of field. In the present study, HIM was used to characterize the surfaces of unaltered and experimental dental adhesive resins. Results reported in the present study have indicated that experimental materials displayed surface characteristics that were comparable to those of OPTB. In addition, phase separation between nanoparticles and the polymeric matrix was not be observed for all nanoparticles and experimental materials investigated. According to Nikolaidis et al.49 the absence of phase separation in nanofilled dental biomaterials is a good indication of the successful functionalization of nanoparticles into current polymer compositions, and typically translates into experimental materials with superior physical, mechanical and biological properties.

Wang et al.50 demonstrated that manual incorporation of 10% (wt./wt.) methacryl isobutyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanoparticles (MI-POSS) resulted in phase separation between nanoparticles and the polymer matrix, and resulted in experimental materials with inferior surface and mechanical properties50. According to Abedin et al.51 phase separation in dental adhesive resins undermines the integrity and durability of the adhesive interface, leads to the leaching of large amounts of unreacted monomers, and may increase the hydrolytic degradation of current polymer compositions.

Small-angle X-ray scattering is a non-destructive, powerful and well-established technique in the field of materials science52 that provides averaged structural data over macroscopic sample volumes53. Figure 2 illustrates the results from the SAXS experiment for surface-modified N_TiO2 suspended in D2O (Fig. 2A) or D2O containing either NaCl (0.1 M or 1.0 M) or HCl (0.1 M) (Fig. 2B). Figure 2A shows that surface-modified nanoparticles were associated with X-Ray scatterings that were dominated by steep slopes and low intensities (between 4.4937 and 0.0062 a.u.) that varied in a particle-size dependent manner (NaOH <NaOH+APTES < NaOH+APTES + Alb). This finding suggest that each surface modification step resulted in nanoparticles of slightly larger diameters. In addition, X-Ray scatterings suggested that surface-modified nanoparticles tend to agglomerate more when compared to as-synthesized nanoparticles. The results of the present study are in agreement with those reported by Szczerba et al.54 who demonstrated that X-ray scattering intensity strongly and positively correlates with nanoparticles’ dimensions.

According to Garcia et al.55 the utilization of small-sized particles (1–20 nm) promotes the formation of nanoparticle agglomerates. Ashraf et al.56 while investigating the effects of particle size and agglomeration on the properties of nanocomposites have demonstrated that the presence of nano-agglomerates in polymers result in materials displaying low interfacial/interphase properties and poor tensile strength. In a recent study, Garcia et al.57 have demonstrated the ability of imidazolium ionic solutions (1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate) to stabilize the agglomeration of titania quantum dots (size distribution 1.19 nm to 7.11 nm) and resulted in experimental dental adhesive resins displaying promising properties (antibacterial, degree of conversion and adhesion). Pfeiffer et al.58 while extensively reviewing the literature regarding the impact of ionic environments on the physico-chemical properties of different types of nanoparticles, indicated that pH directly influenced the colloidal stability of ZnO59,60, TiO261 and AL2O362 nanoparticles by changing their surface redox potential and electronic stability63.

In the present study, Fig. 2B clearly shows that ionic solutions containing NaCl (0.1 M or 1.0 M) or HCl (0.1 M) were capable of modifying the agglomeration behavior of surface-modified nanoparticles, as denoted by X-Ray scatterings dominated by gradual inclines and very high X-ray scattering intensities (between 91.2020 and 0.1744 a.u.). These results indicate that ionic solutions investigated were able to overcome potential negative effects derived from the surface modification strategies investigated. The control over nanoparticles’ agglomeration behavior is anticipated to result in experimental materials displaying superior physical, mechanical and biological properties.

Figure 3(A,B) illustrate the results from ToF-SIMS chemical mapping of specimens fabricated with either unaltered or experimental dental adhesive resins containing 20% (v/v) of nanoparticles (as-synthesized or surface-modified). It is possible to observe that experimental materials displayed ionic fragmentation behaviors that were identical to those observed for OPTB. These findings suggest that the incorporation of nanoparticles did not disturb the molecular makeup of OPTB and seemed to be compatible with the polymeric matrix of the parental polymer. The results presented in Fig. 4(A–D) shows the results from the 2-D ToF-SIMS chemical imaging demonstrating the distribution of Ti+ cations on OPTB (4 A) or experimental adhesives containing as-synthesized nanoparticles (n-TiO2 [4B], N_TiO2 [4 C] and NF_TiO2 [4D]). It is clear that the highest amounts of Ti+ were observed in Fig. 4C (N_TiO2). Kim et al.64 while extensively reviewing the utilization of ToF-SIMS to probe metal nanoparticles (gold, magnetic and semi-conducting) have indicated that ToF-SIMS can probe the functionalization and location of gold nanoparticles in biological systems, thereby corroborating the findings of the present study regarding the distribution of incorporated nanoparticles.

According to Willumeit65 SANS is an accurate and time-resolved instrument with resolutions at the nanometer and subnanometer levels and, therefore, is considered as a powerful tool to investigate the properties of complex materials containing hydrogen. Figure 5A illustrate SANS results for N_TiO2 (as-synthesized or surface-modified) suspended in D2O or D2O + HCl (0.1 M). The findings reported are in agreement with the results from the SAXS experiment, and have indicated that surface-modification strategies used in the present study were indeed successful in grafting APTES and Alb onto the surfaces of metaloxide nanoparticles. In addition, these results corroborate the utilization of low-strength HCl to control nanoparticles’ agglomeration prior to their incorporation and functionalization in experimental dental adhesives. SANS results demonstrate that all materials investigated displayed neutron scattering behavior that were very similar, which indicates that the incorporation of 20% (v/v) of nanoparticles (either as-synthesized or surface-modified) did not adversely impacted the morphology or the structure of polymeric chains in OPTB (in scales from 200-10 nm, correspondent to q ranges between 0.003 and 0.1 Å−1). These findings have further corroborated the results from HIM and ToF-SIMS regarding the functionalization of nanoparticles in OPTB.

Conclusions

The present study has successfully demonstrated the synthesis (n-TiO2), doping (N_TiO2 or NF_TiO2) and surface modification (Dn-TiO2, DN_TiO2, DNF_TiO2) of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, as well as, their incorporation into a commercially available dental adhesive resin (OPTB). The present study represents an effort to comprehensively characterize nanoparticles and experimental materials using advanced scientific methodologies, such as Helium-ion microscopy, time-of-flight secondary ions spectrometry and small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering. The present study has shown that surface-modification strategies results in nanoparticles that are larger in diameter and tend to display higher agglomeration levels when compared to as-synthesized N_TiO2. The SAXS and SANS results reported have clearly indicated that low-strength ionic solutions may be used to improve the dispersion of nanoparticles prior to their incorporation into dental adhesive resins. The present study has also demonstrated that the incorporation of nanoparticles (undoped or doped; as-synthesize or surface-modified) did not altered the 3-dimensional lamellar distribution of polymer chains and resulted in experimental materials that did not phase separated. SANS results indicated the establishment of smooth interfaces between discrete dispersed nanoparticles and the polymeric matrix, thereby suggesting the attainment of covalent functionalization of nanoparticles in OPTB. It is anticipated that the present study can positively impact the field of dental materials science by offering important information for the development of multifunctional nanofilled materials with promising antibacterial, bioactive and bond-promoting properties. Further optimization and functionalization of nanoparticles in polymer-based dental biomaterials are made necessary to produce the state-of-the-art stimuli-responsive polymers that will be capable of preventing the occurrence of secondary caries.

Acknowledgements

The present research was made possible in part by funding through the award project number HR16-131, from the Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology. The synthesis, doping, surface-modification and advanced characterization of titania nanoparticles were conducted at Center for Nanophase and Materials Science (CNMS2018-034) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (IPTS-20335.1) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is a DOE Office of Science user facility. The ToF-SIMS characterization of experimental materials containing synthesized nanoparticles was conducted at CNMS using instrumentation within ORNL’s Materials Characterization Core provided by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The Bio-SANS of the Center for Structural Molecular Biology at the High Flux Isotope Reactor is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US Department of Energy.

Author contributions

F.L.E.F. was responsible for funding acquisition, conceptualization of the study and writing the manuscript, S.S.K. critically reviewed the manuscript, A.A.T. conducted the H.I.M. imaging at C.N.M.S. and critically reviewed the manuscript, A.I. conducted ToF-SIMS experiments and critically reviewed the manuscript, S.Q. conducted the S.A.X.S. and S.A.N.S. experiments and has critically reviewed the manuscript, A.J.R. synthesized, surface-modified and functionalized the nanoparticles, and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:407–431. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang N, et al. Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? Materials. 2016;9:888. doi: 10.3390/ma9110888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bourbia M, Ma D, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP, Finer Y. Cariogenic bacteria degrade dental resin composites and adhesives. J Dent Res. 2013;92:989–994. doi: 10.1177/0022034513504436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spencer P, Ye Q, Misra A, Goncalves SEP, Laurence JS. Proteins, Pathogens, and Failure at the Composite-Tooth Interface. Journal of Dental Research. 2014;93:1243–1249. doi: 10.1177/0022034514550039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre JP. Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater. 2014;30:16–32. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can’t predict? Dent Mater. 2013;29:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Demarco, F. F. et al. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Brazilian Oral Research31 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey PA, Marcenes W. Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. Journal of Dental Research. 2015;94:1355–1361. doi: 10.1177/0022034515602879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pashley DH, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83:216–221. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005;84:741–746. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carrilho MR, et al. Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in vitro. J Dent Res. 2007;86:90–94. doi: 10.1177/154405910708600115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Makvandi P, Jamaledin R, Jabbari M, Nikfarjam N, Borzacchiello A. Antibacterial quaternary ammonium compounds in dental materials: A systematic review. Dental Materials. 2018;34:851–867. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Imazato S, et al. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3605–3609. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00217-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beyth N, et al. Surface antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of incorporated polyethylenimine nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4157–4163. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3995–4002. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brackett MG, et al. The critical barrier to progress in dentine bonding with the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent. 2011;39:238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foster HA, Ditta IB, Varghese S, Steele A. Photocatalytic disinfection using titanium dioxide: spectrum and mechanism of antimicrobial activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:1847–1868. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3213-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Musk P, Campbell R, Staples J, Moss DJ, Parsons PG. Solar and UVC-induced mutation in human cells and inhibition by deoxynucleosides. Mutat Res. 1989;227:25–30. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(89)90064-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jagadale TC, et al. N-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticle Based Visible Light Photocatalyst by Modified Peroxide Sol−Gel Method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:14595–14602. doi: 10.1021/jp803567f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mrowetz M, Balcerski W, Colussi AJ, Hoffmann MR. Oxidative Power of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 Photocatalysts under Visible Illumination. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108:17269–17273. doi: 10.1021/jp0467090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang G, et al. Significantly Enhanced Visible Light Photoelectrochemical Activity in TiO2 Nanowire Arrays by Nitrogen Implantation. Nano Letters. 2015;15:4692–4698. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen H, Dawson JA. Nature of Nitrogen-Doped Anatase TiO2 and the Origin of Its Visible-Light Activity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2015;119:15890–15895. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Janpetch N, Vanichvattanadecha C, Rujiravanit R. Photocatalytic disinfection of water by bacterial cellulose/N–F co-doped TiO2 under fluorescent light. Cellulose. 2015;22:3321–3335. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0721-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pongwan P, Wetchakun K, Phanichphant S, Wetchakun N. Enhancement of visible-light photocatalytic activity of Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2016;42:2815–2830. doi: 10.1007/s11164-015-2179-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ashkarran AA, Hamidinezhad H, Haddadi H, Mahmoudi M. Double-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as an efficient visible-light-active photocatalyst and antibacterial agent under solar simulated light. Applied Surface Science. 2014;301:338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Esteban Florez FL, et al. Antibacterial dental adhesive resins containing nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2018;93:931–943. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huo Y, et al. Highly Active TiO2-xNx Visible Photocatalyst Prepared by N-Doping in Et3N/EtOH Fluid under Supercritical Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:6546–6550. doi: 10.1021/jp711966c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dinh C-T, Nguyen T-D, Kleitz F, Do T-O. Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Highly Crystalline Titania Nanocrystals. ACS Nano. 2009;3:3737–3743. doi: 10.1021/nn900940p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Neouze, M.-A. & Schubert, U. J. M. f. C.-C. M. Surface Modification and Functionalization of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles by Organic Ligands. 139, 183–195, 10.1007/s00706-007-0775-2 (2008).
  • 30.Belianinov A, et al. Noble gas ion beams in materials science for future applications and devices. MRS Bulletin. 2017;42:660–666. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2017.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ievlev AV, et al. Building with ions: towards direct write of platinum nanostructures using in situ liquid cell helium ion microscopy. Nanoscale. 2017;9:12949–12956. doi: 10.1039/C7NR04417H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Borodinov N, et al. Molecular reorganization in bulk bottlebrush polymers: direct observation via nanoscale imaging. Nanoscale. 2018;10:18001–18009. doi: 10.1039/C8NR05630G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ramachandra R, Griffin B, Joy D. A model of secondary electron imaging in the helium ion scanning microscope. Ultramicroscopy. 2009;109:748–757. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim S, et al. Graphene milling dynamics during helium ion beam irradiation. Carbon. 2018;138:277–282. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Leppänen M, et al. Imaging Bacterial Colonies and Phage–Bacterium Interaction at Sub-Nanometer Resolution Using Helium-Ion Microscopy. Advanced Biosystems. 2017;1:1700070. doi: 10.1002/adbi.201700070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burch MJ, et al. Helium Ion Microscopy for Imaging and Quantifying Porosity at the Nanoscale. Analytical Chemistry. 2018;90:1370–1375. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Heller WT, et al. The suite of small-angle neutron scattering instruments at Oak Rdige National Laboratory. Journal of applied crystallography. 2018;51:242–248. doi: 10.1107/S1600576718001231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hammouda B. A new Guinier-Porod model. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2010;43:716–719. doi: 10.1107/S0021889810015773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li FB, Li XZ, Hou MF. Photocatalytic degradation of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in aqueous La3+–TiO2 suspension for odor control. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2004;48:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zalas M, Laniecki M. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation over lanthanides-doped titania. Solar Energy Materials $ Sola Cells. 2005;89:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xie Y, Yuan C. Visible-light responsive cerium ion modified titania sol and nanocrystallites for X-3B dye photodegradation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2003;46:251–259. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00211-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu J, Ao Y, Fu D, Yuan C. A simple route for the preparation of Eu, N-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced visible light-induced photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;328:447–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.08.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Di Paola A, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds in aqueous systems by transition metal doped polycrystalline TiO2. Catalysis Today. 2002;75:87–93. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00048-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxides. Science. 2001;293:269. doi: 10.1126/science.1061051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu C, Tang X, Mo C, Qiang Z. Characterization and activity of visible-light-driven TiO2 photocatalyst codoped with nitrogen and cerium. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2008;181:913–919. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.01.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li D, Haneda H, Hishita S, Ohashi N. Visible-Light-Driven N−F−Codoped TiO2 Photocatalysts. 1. Synthesis by Spray Pyrolysis and Surface Characterization. Chemistry of Materials. 2005;17:2588–2595. doi: 10.1021/cm049100k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sakthivel S, Janczarek M, Kisch H. Visible Light Activity and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108:19384–19387. doi: 10.1021/jp046857q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bidlack, F. B., Huynh, C., Marshman, J. & Goetze, B. Helium ion microscopy of enamel crystallites and extracellular tooth enamel matrix. Frontiers in Physiology5, 10.3389/fphys.2014.00395 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Nikolaidis AK, Koulaouzidou EA, Gogos C, Achilias DS. Synthesis and Characterization of Dental Nanocomposite Resins Filled with Different Clay Nanoparticles. Polymers. 2019;11:730. doi: 10.3390/polym11040730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang W, et al. Structure-property relationships in hybrid dental nanocomposite resins containing monofunctional and multifunctional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:841–852. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S56062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abedin F, Ye Q, Good HJ, Parthasarathy R, Spencer P. Polymerization- and solvent-induced phase separation in hydrophilic-rich dentin adhesive mimic. Acta biomaterialia. 2014;10:3038–3047. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lipfert J, Doniach S. Small-angle X-ray scattering from RNA, proteins, and protein complexes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:307–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li T, Senesi AJ, Lee B. Small Angle X-ray Scattering for Nanoparticle Research. Chemical Reviews. 2016;116:11128–11180. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Szczerba W, Costo R, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, Morales MDP, Thünemann AF. SAXS analysis of single- and multi-core iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Journal of applied crystallography. 2017;50:481–488. doi: 10.1107/S1600576717002370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Garcia IM, et al. Quantum Dots as Nonagglomerated Nanofillers for Adhesive Resins. J. Dent. Res. 2016;95:1401–1407. doi: 10.1177/0022034516656838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ashraf MA, Peng W, Zare Y, Rhee KY. Effects of Size and Aggregation/Agglomeration of Nanoparticles on the Interfacial/Interphase Properties and Tensile Strength of Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanoscale research letters. 2018;13:214–214. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2624-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garcia IM, Souza VS, Hellriegel C, Scholten JD, Collares FM. Ionic Liquid–Stabilized Titania Quantum Dots Applied in Adhesive Resin. Journal of Dental Research. 2019;98:682–688. doi: 10.1177/0022034519835203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pfeiffer C, et al. Interaction of colloidal nanoparticles with their local environment: the (ionic) nanoenvironment around nanoparticles is different from bulk and determines the physico-chemical properties of the nanoparticles. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2014;11:20130931–20130931. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Liufu S, Xiao H, Li Y. Investigation of PEG adsorption on the surface of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Powder Technology. 2004;145:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.He C, Sasaki T, Usui H, Shimizu Y, Koshizaki N. Fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation in aqueous media and pH-dependent particle size: An approach to study the mechanism of enhanced green photoluminescence. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2007;191:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sugiyama M, Okazaki H, Koda S. Size and Shape Transformation of TiO2Nanoparticles by Irradiation of 308-nm Laser Beam. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2002;41:4666–4674. doi: 10.1143/jjap.41.4666. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Al-Mamun SA, Nakajima R, Ishigaki T. Tuning the size of aluminum oxide nanoparticles synthesized by laser ablation in water using physical and chemical approaches. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2013;392:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parks GA. The Isoelectric Points of Solid Oxides, Solid Hydroxides, and Aqueous Hydroxo Complex Systems. Chemical Reviews. 1965;65:177–198. doi: 10.1021/cr60234a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kim YP, Shon HK, Shin SK, Lee TG. Probing nanoparticles and nanoparticle-conjugated biomolecules using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2015;34:237–247. doi: 10.1002/mas.21437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Willumeit R. Neutron and X-Ray Techniques for Biological and Biomaterials Studies. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2011;13:747–766. doi: 10.1002/adem.201000326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES