Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jun 19;33(4):e13706. doi: 10.1111/dth.13706

Psoriasis, COVID‐19, and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Focusing on the risk of concomitant biological treatment

Michela Magnano 1,, Riccardo Balestri 1, Federico Bardazzi 2, Carlo Mazzatenta 3, Carlo R Girardelli 1, Giulia Rech 1
PMCID: PMC7300759  PMID: 32475056

Dear Editor,

The management of psoriatic patients under biologics during severe acute respiratory syndrome ‐ CoronaVirus ‐ 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) outbreak is of great concern, as well as the outcome of the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) in this population.

We report here nine cases of three Italian districts largely hit by COVID‐19 (Bologna, Lucca, and Trento).

On a pool of 720 psoriatic patients followed by our three referral centers for severe psoriasis, we registered nine swab‐confirmed cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (Table 1). Mean age was 53.9 ± 9.7 years. The most common comorbidity was obesity (mean Body Mass Index = 30.9 ± 5.5), followed by hypertension.

TABLE 1.

Our survey

Age Sex Weight (kg) Height (cm) Smoker (yes/no) Comorbidities Date of SARS‐CoV‐2 swab positive Biologic therapy at the moment of diagnosis Date of symptom onset Reported symptoms Hospitalization (yes/no) ICU (yes/no) Outcome Withdrawal of biologic (yes/no)
1 41 M 125 170 No Obesity March 18, 2020 Ixekizumab March 13, 2020 Fever, arthralgias, anosmia No No Recovered Yes
2 54 F 67 164 No None March 12, 2020 Guselkumab April 01, 2020 Fever, arthralgias, anosmia No No Recovered Yes
3 56 M 100 170 Yes Obesity March 16, 2020 Secukinumab April 05, 2020 Fever, cough, arthralgias No No Recovered Yes
4 62 M 98 170 No Obesity, dyslipidemia March 15, 2020 Adalimumab March 09, 2020 Fever, cough, arthralgias, anosmia No No Recovered Yes
5 69 F 85 165 No Obesity, hypertension April 12, 2020 Adalimumab April 11, 2020 Fever, anosmia No No Recovered Yes
6 55 M 86 170 Yes None March 19, 2020 Ixekizumab No symptoms None No No Recovered No
7 37 F 74 172 No None April 08, 2020 Ustekinumab March 17, 2020 Fever, cough No No Recovered Yes
8 49 F 76 170 No None April 11, 2020 Adalimumab March 14, 2020 Fever, cough, arthralgias, anosmia No No Recovered Yes
9 62 M 84 170 Yes Obesity, hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal failure March 04, 2020 Etanercept February 25, 2020 Fever, cough, dyspnea Yes Yes Recovered Yes

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

At the time of the diagnosis, four patients were being treated with an anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α (anti‐TNF‐α) and five with an anti‐interleukin (IL). Eight patients reported COVID‐19‐related symptoms, of which the most common were fever, arthralgias, and cough. One patient was asymptomatic. The course of the disease was mild in most patients, except for a 69‐year‐old woman under adalimumab, who developed unilateral pneumonia, and a 62‐year old man, under etanercept and affected by multiple comorbidities (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic renal failure) who presented acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring intensive care. Eventually, all patients clinically recovered. The biologic therapies were discontinued in eight patients after the symptom onset. The asymptomatic patient never interrupted the treatment.

Our case series roughly reflects the study of Gisondi et al, 1 who concluded that despite the cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities affecting psoriatic patients and also representing risk factors for severe COVID‐19, patients seldom required hospitalization.

Among our cases, one middle‐aged man developed critical COVID‐19. This is the first report of ARDS in a psoriatic patient undergoing biological treatment; however, this may be related to his other serious comorbidities. This percentage (1/9%‐11.4%) is consistent with the rate of ARDS in the general population, estimated at around 14.8% of affected individuals. 2

The appropriateness of withdrawing biologic therapies preventively in psoriatic patients is still debated and it is also unclear whether their use influences the course of COVID‐19 or not. 3

Although it seems that most psoriatic patients experience mild COVID‐19, our case series raises some considerations. We know that the main risk factor for severe COVID‐19 is old age. 4 The psoriatic population treated with biologic therapies is on average young, 5 since elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are usually excluded from systemic treatments. Our sample is in line with these data, therefore we can expect a lower fatality rate than in the general population.

Nevertheless, the course of COVID‐19 could be complicated by the concomitant administration of immunomodulators, which in pivotal trials have demonstrated to increase the susceptibility of respiratory infections. Particularly, anti‐TNF drugs seem to increase such condition by up to 7% compared with placebo. 6 However, high levels of TNF‐α have been observed in severe COVID‐19 patients, while IL‐17 may also be involved in the cytokine cascade, having been linked to severe cases. 7 Therefore, the abrupt interruption of biologics may increase the systemic inflammation, which may worsen the associated comorbidities and the prognosis of COVID‐19. However, we decided to withdraw biologic therapies in eight of the nine patients after the diagnosis, mainly to avoid other microbial infections, although the asymptomatic patient did not develop any complications throughout the course of the disease.

It is also noteworthy that obesity was the most represented comorbidity. Despite the fact that obese patients tend to have more severe forms of COVID‐19 also at younger ages, 8 88.9% of our patients were mild or asymptomatic. Biologics may play a role in these cases, modulating the inflammatory response, usually overexpressed in obese patients.

Although this case series is limited, we evidenced that ARDS can represent a complication also in patients under biologics. However, these subjects do not seem to develop critical COVID‐19 more often than the general population of same age range.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to publication of their case details.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Gisondi P, Facheris P, Dapavo P, et al. The impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on patients with chronic plaque psoriasis being treated with biologic therapy: the Northern Italy experience. Br J Dermatol. 2020. [Online ahead of print]. 10.1111/bjd.19158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Li C, Xu BH. The viral, epidemiologic, clinical characteristics and potential therapy options for COVID‐19: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(8):4576‐4584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bardazzi F, Loi C, Sacchelli L, Di Altobrando A. Biologic therapy for psoriasis during the covid‐19 outbreak is not a choice. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31(4):320‐321. 10.1080/09546634.2020.1749545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Riccardo F, Andrianou X, Bella A, Del Manso M, Urdiales AM, Fabiani M, et al. For Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 7th May 2020. Retrieved by https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/bollettino/Bollettino‐sorveglianza‐integrata‐COVID‐19_7‐maggio‐2020.pdf (last accessed May 14 2020).
  • 5. Grodner C, Sbidian E, Weill A, Mezzarobba M. Epidemiologic study in a real‐world analysis of patients with treatment for psoriasis in the French national health insurance database. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020. [Online ahead of print]. 10.1111/jdv.16566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lebwohl M, Rivera‐Oyola R, Murrell DF. Should biologics for psoriasis be interrupted in the era of COVID‐19? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1217‐1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Price KN, Frew JW, Hsiao JL, Shi VY. COVID‐19 and immunomodulator/immunosuppressant use in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):e173‐e175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kass DA, Duggal P, Cingolani O. Obesity could shift severe COVID‐19 disease to younger ages. Lancet. 2020;395(10236):1544‐1545. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31024-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dermatologic Therapy are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES