Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jun 4;36(3):3–7. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12572

I heard it through the grapevine: On herd immunity and why it is important

A DAVID NAPIER
PMCID: PMC7300792  PMID: 32572295

Abstract

A. David Napier has been studying immunology and immunologists for more than three decades. In this article, he argues that the medicalization of viral epidemics has distracted us from the importance of their true social drivers: that is, the behaviour of people when they are together – what epidemiologists call human herds. On their own, viruses cannot ‘invade’ us. Our cells bring them to life and make them infectious through our social actions. Confusing viruses with invasive microbes not only leads us to misuse antibiotics, but fosters xenophobic responses towards outside carriers – as even our neighbours become categorical ‘others’ in the face of a foreign threat. Indeed, new work in viral epidemiology indicates that many viruses have infectious potential long before an epidemic develops. It is not only changes within viruses that cause epidemics, but also the condition of human herds – how we behave socially – that ignites the rapid circulation of viral information.


 

Biography

David Napier is Professor of Medical Anthropology at University College London (UCL) and Director of its Science, Medicine, and Society Network. Napier has been involved in three Lancet commissions, leading the 2014 Lancet Commission on Culture and Health. He is currently International Chair, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Committee on the Cultural Contexts of Health and Wellbeing. He is also Innovations Lead for Sonar‐Global, a European Commission social science network responding to infectious disease outbreaks and antimicrobial resistance. His email is d.napier@ucl.ac.uk.

I would like to thank the following people for reviewing an earlier draft of this essay: Rebecca Carter, Edward Fischer, Tamara Giles‐Vernick, Andrew Lemert, Robert Muller, Young Su Park, Cynthia Rosenberg, Nancy Scheper‐Hughes, Paul Sender, Anna‐Maria Volkmann and David Wengrow.

References

  1. Anderson, W. & Mackay I.R. 2014. Intolerant bodies: A short history of autoimmunity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantlupe, J. 2017. Expert forum: The rise (and rise) of the healthcare administrator. Athenahealth, 7 November. https://www.athenahealth.com/knowledge-hub/practice-management/expert-forum-rise-and-rise-healthcare-administrator.
  3. Debbink, K. et al. 2013. Emergence of new pandemic GII.4 Sydney norovirus strain correlates with escape from herd immunity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 208: 1877–1887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission n.d. Urbanisation worldwide. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/foresight/topic/continuing-urbanisation/worldwide-urban-population-growth_en.
  5. Jooss, K. & Chirmule N. 2003. Immunity to adenovirus and adeno‐associated viral vectors: Implications for gene therapy. Gene Therapy 10: 955–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kallikourdis, M. 2018. T cell responses to tumor: How dominant assumptions on immune activity led to a neglect of pathological functions, and how evolutionary considerations can help identify testable hypotheses for improving immunotherapy. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 67(6): 989–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindesmith, L.C. et al. 2012. Immunogenetic mechanisms driving norovirus GII.4 antigenic variation. PLoS Pathogens 8(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindesmith, L.C. et al. 2013. Emergence of a norovirus GII.4 strain correlates with changes in evolving blockade epitopes. Journal of Virology 87: 2803–2813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marmot, M. 2015. The health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Napier, A.D. 1992. Foreign bodies. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Napier, A.D. 2003. The age of immunology: Conceiving a future in an alienating world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Napier, A.D. 2012. Nonself help: How immunology might reframe the enlightenment. Cultural Anthropology 27(1): 122–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Napier, A.D. 2013. A new sociobiology: Immunity, alterity, and the social repertoire. Cambridge Anthropology 31(2): 20–43. [Google Scholar]
  14. Napier, A.D. 2017. Epidemics and xenophobia, or, why xenophilia matters. Social Research: An International Quarterly 84(1): 59–81. [Google Scholar]
  15. Plotkin S.A. & Fantini B. (eds) 1996. Vaccinia, vaccination, vaccinology: Jenner, Pasteur and their successors. Paris: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ruis, C. et al. 2019. Preadaptation of pandemic GII.4 noroviruses in hidden virus reservoirs years before emergence. bioRxiv preprint first posted online 3 June 2019.

Articles from Anthropology Today are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES