Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jun 1;126(17):3900–3906. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32969

Management of primary skin cancer during a pandemic: Multidisciplinary recommendations

Brian C Baumann 1,2, Kelly M MacArthur 3,, Jerry D Brewer 4, William M Mendenhall 5, Christopher A Barker 6, Jeremy R Etzkorn 7, Nathaniel J Jellinek 8,9,10, Jeffrey F Scott 11, Hiram A Gay 1, John C Baumann 12, Farrin A Manian 13, Phillip M Devlin 14, Jeff M Michalski 1, Nancy Y Lee 6, Wade L Thorstad 1, Lynn D Wilson 15, Carlos A Perez 1, Christopher J Miller 7
PMCID: PMC7301000  PMID: 32478867

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, providers and patients must engage in shared decision making regarding the pros and cons of early versus delayed interventions for localized skin cancer. Patients at highest risk of COVID‐19 complications are older; are immunosuppressed; and have diabetes, cancer, or cardiopulmonary disease, with multiple comorbidities associated with worse outcomes. Physicians must weigh the patient's risk of COVID‐19 complications in the event of exposure against the risk of worse oncologic outcomes from delaying cancer therapy. Herein, the authors have summarized current data regarding the risk of COVID‐19 complications and mortality based on age and comorbidities and have reviewed the literature assessing how treatment delays affect oncologic outcomes. They also have provided multidisciplinary recommendations regarding the timing of local therapy for early‐stage skin cancers during this pandemic with input from experts at 11 different institutions. For patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, the authors recommend prioritizing treatment, but a short delay can be considered for patients with favorable T1 disease who are at higher risk of COVID‐19 complications. For patients with melanoma, the authors recommend delaying the treatment of patients with T0 to T1 disease for 3 months if there is no macroscopic residual disease at the time of biopsy. Treatment of tumors ≥T2 can be delayed for 3 months if the biopsy margins are negative. For patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, those with Brigham and Women's Hospital T1 to T2a disease can have their treatment delayed for 2 to 3 months unless there is rapid growth, symptomatic lesions, or the patient is immunocompromised. The treatment of tumors ≥T2b should be prioritized, but a 1‐month to 2‐month delay is unlikely to worsen disease‐specific mortality. For patients with squamous cell carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma, treatment can be deferred for 3 months unless the individual is highly symptomatic.

Keywords: basal cell carcinoma, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, Mohs surgery, radiotherapy, skin cancer, treatment delays

Short abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, providers must help patients to make informed decisions regarding skin cancer management and assess the risk of potential COVID‐19–associated morbidity and/or mortality versus primary skin cancer morbidity and/or mortality. In this article, the authors summarize current data regarding the risk of COVID‐19 complications and mortality based on age and comorbidities, and review the literature assessing how treatment delays affect oncologic outcomes. They provide multidisciplinary recommendations regarding the timing of local therapy for patients with early‐stage skin cancers.

Introduction

In the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and several physician organizations recently have recommended delaying definitive local therapy for many patients with skin cancer. Physicians who were once accustomed to treating skin cancers promptly now must engage in shared decision making with patients to ensure that the marginal benefit of early intervention for skin cancer exceeds the risk of contracting COVID‐19 in the clinic setting.

To make informed decisions regarding whether to delay skin cancer treatment during this pandemic, risk assessment of potential COVID‐19–associated morbidity and mortality versus primary skin cancer morbidity and mortality is necessary. Physicians also have to consider the temporal issues related to earlier risks from COVID‐19 infection versus the later risks of skin cancer progression. Because skin cancer is more common than all other cancers combined, 1 the magnitude of patients who may be at risk of complications of COVID‐19 cannot be overemphasized. 1

In this article, we have summarized current data regarding COVID‐19 infection and mortality rates and reviewed the literature assessing how delays in primary skin cancer management may influence cancer‐related outcomes. These data will help physicians and patients to interpret skin cancer treatment recommendations recently published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS), and the joint recommendations from the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and the British Society for Dermatological Surgery (BSDS). We also have provided multidisciplinary recommendations for the timing of local therapy for patients with early‐stage skin cancers during the COVID‐19 pandemic that build on the recently published guidelines from medical societies. These recommendations were reached after discussion with experts from dermatologic surgery, radiation oncology, and infectious disease from 11 leading institutions in the United States. These opinions focused on the management of primary, nonanogenital early‐stage skin tumors in presumed COVID‐19–negative patients and did not address the management of regional or distant metastases from skin cancer or drug therapy (eg, chemotherapy or immunotherapy). These recommendations may be useful for patients and clinicians in any future scenario in which a treatment delay is being considered.

COVID‐19 Infection: Factors Associated With Severe Complications and Death

Currently, there are >250,000 cases of COVID‐19 in the United States and the number of cases is expected to rise considerably. 1 The risk of severe complications and death from COVID‐19 is highest in patients who are older or who have comorbidities including immunosuppression, diabetes, cancer, or cardiopulmonary disease. 2 In the United States, admission rates to the intensive care unit appear to increase with age: 4.7% to 11.2% for individuals aged 55 to 64 years, 8.1% to 18.8% for individuals aged 65 to 74 years, and 10.5% to 31.0% for individuals aged 75 to 84 years. Mortality rates also increase with age: 0.1% to 0.2% for individuals aged 20 to 44 years, 0.5% to 0.8% for individuals aged 45 to 54 years, 1.4% to 2.6% for individuals aged 55 to 64 years, 2.7% to 4.9% for individuals aged 65 to 74 years, 4.3% to 10.5% for individuals aged 75 to 84 years, and 10.4% to 27.3% for individuals aged ≥85 years. 2 Data are similar in other countries. In China, mortality rates were reported to be approximately 8% in patients aged 70 to 79 years and 14.8% for patients aged ≥80 years. 3 Chinese patients with COVID‐19 had higher death rates if they had cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), chronic respiratory disease (6.3%), hypertension (6.0%), or cancer (5.6%). 4 Patients in Italy and other countries also were found to be more likely to die of COVID‐19 if they had comorbidities. 5 Approximately 48% of deaths in Italy occurred in patients with ≥3 medical comorbidities, 25% to 26% occurred in patients with 1 to 2 comorbidities, and 1% occurred in patients with no preconditions. 5 These statistics are important to consider because the median age of diagnosis is 60 to 69 years for melanoma, 6 66 years for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 7 75 to 79 years for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), 8 and 78 to 80 years for squamous cell carcinoma. 9 , 10 Immunosuppressed patients are up to 70 times more likely to develop skin cancer, and the prevalence of diabetes and cardiopulmonary disease is relatively high in the older patient population most at risk for skin cancer. Assessing the patient's comorbid disease burden and risk of COVID‐19–associated intensive care unit admission and mortality is important to triage patients for early versus delayed skin cancer treatment. 11 , 12

In addition to understanding the patient's risk of COVID‐19 complications if they contract the disease, physicians also must carefully consider the oncologic risks of postponing skin cancer treatment on a case‐by‐case basis. Untreated skin cancer may progress to a more advanced stage, potentially increasing the risk of cancer‐specific mortality. Reviewing outcomes by clinical stage can help with shared decision making regarding whether to delay treatment (Table 1). 13 , 14 , 15 The following section summarizes the available data concerning the impact of treatment delays for skin cancers with the highest to lowest rates of metastases. We also have summarized recently published advisory statements for skin cancer treatment during the COVID‐19 pandemic and provided multidisciplinary recommendations to assist providers. Clinical judgement is critical in making decisions, especially for patients with symptomatic lesions or those lesions occurring in high‐risk locations.

Table 1.

Summary of Oncologic Outcomes by T Classification for Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Cutaneous Melanoma, and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  Merkel Cell Carcinoma b Cutaneous Melanoma c Squamous Cell Carcinoma d
Clinical T Classification a 5‐Year OS 5‐Year DSM 10‐Year DSM 10‐Year DSM
T1 T1: 56% (54%‐58%)     T1: 0.2% (0%‐0.5%)
T1a   1% 2%  
T1b   1% 4%  
T2 T2‐T3: 41% (39%‐44%)      
T2a 4% 8% T2a: 0.2% (0%‐0.5%)
T2b 7% 12% T2b‐T3: 22% (13%‐34%) e
T3    
T3a 6% 12%  
T3b 14% 19%  
T4 T4: 32% (25%‐39%)      
T4a   10% 17%  
T4b   18% 25%  

Abbreviations: DSM, disease‐specific mortality; OS, overall survival.

a

Squamous cell carcinoma classification was performed using Brigham and Women's Hospital staging; otherwise, the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system was used.

b

Classified according to Harms et al 13 (2016). Survival outcomes listed were for patients with lymph node–negative disease.

c

Classified according to Gershenwald et al 14 (2017).

d

Classified according to Karia et al 15 (2014).

e

T3 tumors classified according to Brigham and Women's Hospital staging and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system are very rare, with a DSM rate of 100% noted at 10 years. 15

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

MCC is a primary skin cancer with a propensity for regional and metastatic spread, similar to cutaneous melanoma. 16 , 17 , 18 Unlike melanoma, the primary tumor growth of MCC is more often rapid and therefore warrants prompt treatment with wide local excision with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. 19 , 20 , 21 Although to our knowledge there are few studies to date reporting on the outcomes of a treatment delay in the definitive surgical management of patients with MCC, an Australian retrospective study examined the impact of treatment delay for patients treated with either definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy and demonstrated that delays in treatment were associated with deleterious outcomes. 22 Five of 11 patients (45%) who were referred for adjuvant radiation developed progressive disease before initiating radiotherapy, with a median time from surgery to disease progression of 30 days (range, 2‐48 days). All 5 patients with disease progression had negative surgical margins. Sites of disease progression included the surgical bed (3 patients) and/or the regional lymph nodes (3 patients). Two of 8 patients (25%) who were referred for definitive radiotherapy experienced disease progression prior to the initiation of radiotherapy at a median of 44 days from their biopsy date. Although to our knowledge 1 study reported that a treatment delay of >30 days versus ≤30 days from diagnosis to definitive surgery was not found to be affect oncologic outcomes on univariable analysis in a cohort of 240 patients, the median treatment delay and range in each cohort were not reported. 23 The data should be interpreted with caution given the unpredictable natural history of this disease.

Summary recommendations

Two physician societies have offered treatment recommendations for patients with MCC. The NCCN recommends that treatment not be delayed, with the possible exception of tumors measuring <1 cm that are diagnosed in elderly and/or frail patients. 24 The BAD and BSDS recommend prioritizing treatment. 25

The definitive treatment of patients with MCC generally should not be delayed (Table 2). In rare cases in which a patient has a favorable T1 tumor (that measuring <1 cm, with no lymphovascular invasion and no immunosuppression) and has a considerable competing risk of morbidity and/or mortality from COVID‐19 (eg, an elderly individual with multiple high‐risk comorbidities), a 1‐month delay in treatment can be considered because there are data demonstrating that a 1‐month delay was not associated with worse oncologic outcomes. Delaying definitive surgery can worsen oncologic outcomes and increases the likelihood that the patient may need adjuvant radiotherapy, which is recommended under normal clinical circumstances by the NCCN for all patients but those with favorable T1 tumors. Daily adjuvant radiotherapy, which typically is delivered over 5 to 6 weeks, would increase the patient's risk of COVID‐19 exposure. Use of adjuvant radiotherapy should be decided on a case‐by‐case basis, examining the risk/benefit ratio. If adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy is needed, moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy can be considered to minimize the number of visits. 26 For the palliation of metastatic disease, 8 Gray (Gy) delivered in a single fraction can be used. 27

Table 2.

Summary Recommendations for the Local Treatment of Patients With Skin Cancer

Type of Cancer Recommendations a
Merkel cell carcinoma
  • Prioritize treatment

  • Can delay treatment for approximately 1 mo for patients with favorable T1 b disease who are at high risk of COVID‐19 complications

Cutaneous melanoma
  • Can delay treatment for patients with T0‐T1 disease for 3 mo if no macroscopic residual disease is noted at biopsy

  • Can delay treatment for patients with ≥T2 disease for 3 mo if biopsy margins are negative

Basal cell carcinoma
  • Can delay treatment for 3 mo unless patients are highly symptomatic

Squamous cell carcinoma
  • Can delay treatment for patients with Brigham and Women's Hospital T1‐T2a disease for 2‐3 mo unless there is rapid growth, or patients are symptomatic or immunosuppressed

  • Prioritize patients with ≥T2b disease, but a 1‐mo to 2‐mo delay is unlikely to worsen disease‐specific mortality

Abbreviation: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019.

a

Treatment recommendations assume adequacy of biopsy sampling. Clinician judgment is needed in cases of partial sampling if upstaging is suspected. Recommendations are for patients who are presumed to be negative for COVID‐19.

b

Favorable T1 tumors are those measuring <1 cm, with no lymphovascular invasion or immunosuppression.

Cutaneous Melanoma

Melanoma causes 6850 deaths per year in the United States, 1 but the mortality risk depends on tumor stage (Table 1). 13 , 14 , 15 Approximately 90% of melanomas progress through a radial growth phase and can be removed before they develop the potential to metastasize, but 10% of melanomas quickly develop the potential to metastasize. 28 , 29

Several studies have found no association between treatment delays and increased Breslow thickness. 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 In a cohort of 986 patients with cutaneous melanoma who were treated with wide local excision, the timing from biopsy to definitive wide local excision (≤14 days, 15‐28 days, 29‐42 days, 43‐91 days, or ≥ 92 days) did not appear to significantly impact disease‐free or overall survival on multivariable analysis. 35 In contrast, a retrospective study using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2018 reported significantly worse overall survival for patients with stage I to stage III cutaneous melanoma who experienced a delay of >60 days from diagnosis to definitive surgical management compared with patients treated within 60 days of diagnosis. 36 Similarly, another NCDB study reported that delays of ≥30 days from biopsy to definitive surgery were associated with worse overall survival for patients with stage I melanoma. 37 The mortality risk for patients with stage I disease increased with the number of days from biopsy to surgery as follows: a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.05 for 30 to 59 days (95% CI, 1.01‐1.1), a HR of 1.16 for 60 to 89 days (95% CI, 1.07‐1.25), a HR of 1.29 for 90 to 119 days (95% CI, 1.12‐1.48), and a HR of 1.41 for >119 days (95% CI, 1.21‐1.65). 37 A key limitation to NCDB studies is the lack of cancer‐specific survival data. 38

Summary recommendations

Three physician societies have made treatment recommendations for patients with cutaneous melanoma. The NCCN recommends that treatment can be delayed for up to 3 months for patients with T0 to T1 tumors if no macroscopic residual disease is present after biopsy, and treatment can be delayed for up to 3 months among patients with ≥T2 disease if biopsy margins are negative. 39 The ACMS adopted the NCCN recommendations. 40 The BAD and BSDS suggest considering delaying treatment of patients with T0 to T1a tumors for 2 to 3 months after biopsy depending on clinical and histological features. 25

Our recommendations are consistent with those of the NCCN guidelines.

Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) causes as many deaths in the United States as melanoma. 41 The overall risk of metastasis among patients with cSCC is 3.7% to 5.2%, with 2.8% disease‐specific mortality. 10 , 42 The risk of metastasis or death is higher for patients with tumors with increased depth of invasion, a large tumor dimension (≥2 cm), poorly differentiated disease, perineural invasion of larger nerves (≥0.1 mm in dimension), and immunosuppression. 10 , 43 For tumors of a higher T classification (Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH] T2b‐T3 disease), the risk of lymph node metastasis is 24% and the risk of disease‐specific death is 17%. 43

Treatment delay for patients with cSCC is associated with some interval progression in the size of the tumor. In a prospective study of 982 patients with cSCC and BCC who were treated with Mohs surgery, a delay in treatment (median, 2.5 months vs 6.0 months) was found to be significantly associated with tumor growth (P < .0001). 44 Limitations of the study included that the original assessment of lesion size was reported by the patient using a questionnaire, and long‐term oncologic outcomes were not reported. In another cohort of patients with cSCC and BCC, a treatment delay of >1 year was correlated with the Mohs defect doubling in size (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3‐3.1). 45

Although treatment delays for patients with cSCC are associated with some interval enlargement of the tumor, to our knowledge there are no data demonstrating a statistically significant association between treatment delay and an increased risk of disease‐specific mortality, although this association is well documented for patients with mucosal SCC of the head and neck. In those patients, mortality was found to significantly increase with treatment delays of >46 to 52 days, although this study did not include any patients with cSCC. 46 One study of patients with invasive cSCC found that a long treatment delay (>18 months) was associated with a clinical tumor size >2 cm (odds ratio, 4.18; 95% CI, 2.45‐7.13 [P < .001]). 47 Although a tumor size >2 cm has been well established as a prognostic factor associated with worse disease‐specific mortality, 42 , 48 the study did not report oncologic outcomes. cSCC tumor‐specific factors found to be associated with a statistically significantly increased risk of distant metastasis included increased tumor thickness (HR, 4.79; 95% CI, 2.22‐10.36 [P < .01]), immunosuppression (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.62‐11.52 [P < .01]), ear location (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.51‐8.67 [P < .01]), and increased horizontal size (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.18‐4.15 [P < .05]). 49

Summary recommendations

Three physician societies have made recommendations for the treatment of SCC. The NCCN states that treatment can be delayed, but clinicians should consider excision if the tumor poses a risk of metastasis or debilitating disease progression within 3 months. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be avoided unless there is extensive pNI or N2 disease. 24 The ACMS states that treatment can be postponed for 3 months in patients with cSCC in situ and small, well‐differentiated cSCC. Patients with enlarging, symptomatic, or ulcerating tumors; those with perineural involvement; those with poorly differentiated tumors; and those with patient‐specific risk factors (eg, an immunocompromised state) should be prioritized . 40 The BAD and BSDS suggest deferring treatment for patients with cSCC in situ and small, well‐differentiated cSCCs. Patients with the same factors as listed in the ACMS guidelines should be prioritized. 25

Patients with cSCC in situ can have their treatment delayed for 3 months. For cSCC, patients with BWH T1 to T2a disease can have treatment delayed for 2 to 3 months given the very low risk of disease‐specific mortality associated with these tumors (Table 1). 13 , 14 , 15 Patients with tumors that are rapidly enlarging or symptomatic or who are immunosuppressed can be prioritized, balancing the competing risk of COVID‐19 complications. Patients with BWH ≥T2b disease should be prioritized because their oncologic outcomes are considerably worse (Table 2). These patients should be evaluated for delayed treatment on a case‐by‐case basis, weighing patient‐specific and tumor‐specific factors. Although a treatment delay of 1 to 2 months may result in clinical disease progression with regard to the size of the tumor, this progression is unlikely to translate into higher disease‐specific mortality. For older patients, the added risk of COVID‐19 exposure may outweigh the marginal benefit of the earlier treatment of cSCC because younger senior citizens (those aged 65‐74 years) still have a 28.6% to 43.5% risk of hospitalization with COVID‐19 and older senior citizens (those aged 75‐84 years) have a 31.1% to 70.3% risk. 2

For treatment with definitive radiotherapy, 50 the provider should strongly consider delaying treatment and/or using hypofractionation to decrease the number of clinic visits. 51 The recently published American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) clinical practice guidelines for skin cancers provide dose and/or fractionation recommendations for hypofractionated radiation to minimize the number of clinic visits. 51 For hypofractionated radiation (2.1‐5 Gy per fraction) in the definitive setting, we recommend delivering a biologically effective dose (BED) assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) of 56 Gy to 88 Gy, which is consistent with ASTRO guidelines. 51 Acceptable hypofractionated dose regimens for patients with lesions measuring <2 cm in dimension as per the NCCN guidelines that also meet ASTRO BED10 guidelines include 40 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks (BED10 of 56 Gy) and 50 Gy to 55 Gy in 15 to 20 fractions over 3 to 4 weeks. For larger tumors, hypofractionated treatment can be delivered to 50 Gy to 55 Gy over 3 to 4 weeks. 51 In the postoperative setting, we recommend delivering hypofractionated radiotherapy with a BED10 of 56 Gy to 70.2 Gy to the tumor bed. 51 A dose of 50 Gy over 4 weeks is an acceptable option as per the NCCN that also meets ASTRO guidelines (BED10 of 62.5 Gy). Delays in initiating adjuvant radiotherapy after definitive surgery may be associated with worse outcomes for patients with high‐risk tumors and need to be balanced against the patient's risk of COVID‐19 complications. Although delays in initiating adjuvant radiotherapy are associated with worse outcomes in patients with mucosal SCC of the head and neck, to our knowledge the data are limited regarding the impact of such delays for cSCC. The ASTRO clinical practice guidelines are a helpful resource for evidence‐based recommendations regarding treatment indications and acceptable dose and/or fractionation regimens for radiotherapy for cSCC. 51

The clinician must use his or her judgement in evaluating each tumor, considering factors such as predicted tumoral growth, upstaging, increased morbidity of treatment, and risk of evolution into a symptomatic lesion when determining the appropriate timing for treatment.

Basal Cell Carcinoma

BCCs are at low risk of significant progression 52 and mortality as a result of a treatment delay due to the slow natural history of this malignancy. Although to our knowledge no studies to date have investigated the effect of treatment delay on disease‐specific mortality for BCC, a retrospective study found that a mean treatment delay of 70 days (range, 21‐155 days) was associated with a median diameter increase of 0.5 mm and a median area increase of 4.71 mm2. 53 Delaying treatment for >1 year was associated with a doubling of the Mohs defect size. 45

Summary recommendations

Three physician societies have made recommendations for the treatment of patients with BCC. The NCCN recommends delaying treatment during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 24 The ACMS recommends a treatment delay of 3 months unless the patient is highly symptomatic. 40 The BAD and BSDS recommend that treatment be deferred for 3 to 6 months unless the patient is highly symptomatic. 25

Treatment of BCC tumors can be deferred for at least 3 months unless the patient is highly symptomatic. For patients who are treated with definitive radiation, we recommend hypofractionated radiotherapy using the dose and/or fractionation regimens described for patients with cSCC. The recently published ASTRO clinical practice guidelines for skin cancer discuss radiotherapy for patients with BCC. 51

Rare Tumors

Other rare and potentially aggressive cutaneous tumors, such as sarcomas (eg, angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, atypical fibroxanthoma, leiomyosarcoma), adnexal carcinomas, and sebaceous carcinomas should be prioritized for earlier treatment. The treatment of patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans without high‐risk features (eg, fibrosarcomatous changes, deep lesion, or high‐grade tumor) can be deferred for several months given the relatively slow rate of growth and a low likelihood of lymph node and/or distant metastases. 54 NCCN guidelines recommend delaying the treatment of patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans if there are no high‐risk features. 24

Conclusions

Providers must balance the tumor‐specific risks of treatment delays with patient‐specific risks of COVID‐19 community exposure to identify those skin cancers that warrant treatment during this time. For the majority of patients at higher risk of COVID‐19–related morbidity and/or mortality, the risk of contracting COVID‐19 likely outweighs the benefits of early treatment for their skin cancer. Clinician judgement is critical in making these treatment decisions.

Funding Support

Dr. Barker reports grants and non‐financial support from Alpha Tau Medical, grants from Merck, grants from Amgen, grants from Elekta, personal fees and non‐financial support from Regeneron, personal fees and non‐financial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Dr. Barker reports grants and non‐financial support from Alpha Tau Medical, grants from Merck, grants from Amgen, grants from Elekta, personal fees and non‐financial support from Regeneron, personal fees and non‐financial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. The other authors made no disclosures.

Baumann BC, MacArthur KM, Brewer JD, Mendenhall WM, Barker CA, Etzkorn JR, Jellinek NJ, Scott JF, Gay HA, Baumann JC, Manian FA, Devlin PM, Michalski JM, Lee NY, Thorstad WL, Wilson LD, Perez CA, Miller CJ. Management of primary skin cancer during a pandemic: Multidisciplinary recommendations. Cancer. 2020:126:3900‐3906. 10.1002/cncr.32969

The first 2 authors are co‐first authors.

The last 2 authors are co‐senior authors.

References

  • 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. CDC COVID‐19 Response Team . Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)–United States, February 12‐March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:343‐346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team . The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID‐19) in China [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41:145‐151.32064853 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. Published online February 24, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Italian Department of Health . Report on the characteristics of deceased COVID-19 positive patients in Italy based on data updated as of 17 March 2020. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/bollettino/Report-COVID-2019_17_marzo-v2.pdf
  • 6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: cutaneous melanoma. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2020. Accessed March 22, 2020. https://www.nccn.org/covid-19/pdf/NCCN-NMSC.pdf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Asgari MM, Moffet HH, Ray GT, Quesenberry CP. Trends in basal cell carcinoma incidence and identification of high‐risk subgroups, 1998‐2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:976‐981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:457‐463.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Venables ZC, Autier P, Nijsten T, et al. Nationwide incidence of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in England. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:298‐306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Eigentler TK, Leiter U, Hafner HM, Garbe C, Rocken M, Breuninger H. Survival of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: results of a prospective cohort study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2309‐2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lee EH, Nijhawan RI, Nehal KS, et al. Comorbidity assessment in skin cancer patients: a pilot study comparing medical interview with a patient‐reported questionnaire. J Skin Cancer. 2015;2015:953479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Connolly KL, Jeong JM, Barker CA, Hernandez M, Lee EH. A systematic review of comorbidity indices used in the nonmelanoma skin cancer population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:344‐346.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Harms KL, Healy MA, Nghiem P, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors from 9387 Merkel cell carcinoma cases forms the basis for the new 8th edition AJCC staging system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3564‐3571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al;for members of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel and the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform . Melanoma staging: evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:472‐492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Karia PS, Jambusaria‐Pahlajani A, Harrington DP, Murphy GF, Qureshi AA, Schmults CD. Evaluation of American Joint Committee on Cancer, International Union Against Cancer, and Brigham and Women's Hospital tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:327‐334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cornejo C, Miller CJ. Merkel cell carcinoma: updates on staging and management. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:269‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF, et al. Five hundred patients with Merkel cell carcinoma evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2011;254:465‐473; discussion 473‐475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nghiem PT, Bhatia S, Lipson EJ, et al. PD‐1 blockade with pembrolizumab in advanced Merkel‐cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2542‐2552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW. Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 7th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF, et al. Recurrence after complete resection and selective use of adjuvant therapy for stage I through III Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:3311‐3320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Amdur RJ, Shaw C, Dziegielewski PT. Management of cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:320‐323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tsang G, O’Brien P, Robertson R, Hamilton C, Wratten C, Denham J. All delays before radiotherapy risk progression of Merkel cell carcinoma. Australas Radiol. 2004;48:371‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tarantola TI, Vallow LA, Halyard MY, et al. Prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 240 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:425‐432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Advisory statement for non‐melanoma skin cancer care during the COVID‐19 pandemic. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. British Association of Dermatologists , British Society for Dermatologic Surgery . COVID‐19 skin cancer surgery guidance. British Association of Dermatologists, British Society for Dermatologic Surgery; 2020. Accessed March 28, 2020. http://www.bad.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/covid-19 [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cimbak N, Barker CA Jr. Short‐course radiation therapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: relative effectiveness in a radiosensitive tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:S160. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Iyer JG, Parvathaneni U, Gooley T, et al. Single‐fraction radiation therapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2015;4:1161‐1170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Heenan PJ, Holman CD. Nodular malignant melanoma: a distinct entity or a common end stage? Am J Dermatopathol. 1982;4:477‐478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lattanzi M, Lee Y, Simpson D, et al. Primary melanoma histologic subtype: impact on survival and response to therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:180‐188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cassileth BR, Clark WH Jr, Heiberger RM, March V, Tenaglia A. Relationship between patients' early recognition of melanoma and depth of invasion. Cancer. 1982;49:198‐200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Temoshok L, DiClemente RJ, Sweet DM, Blois MS, Sagebiel RW. Factors related to patient delay in seeking medical attention for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1984;54:3048‐3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Temoshok L, Heller BW, Sagebiel RW, et al. The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:139‐153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Krige JE, Isaacs S, Hudson DA, King HS, Strover RM, Johnson CA. Delay in the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. A prospective study in 250 patients. Cancer. 1991;68:2064‐2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Baccard M, Chevret S, Chemaly P, Morel P. Delay in diagnosing melanoma. A prospective study in 102 patients [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1997;124:601‐606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. McKenna DB, Lee RJ, Prescott RJ, Doherty VR. The time from diagnostic excision biopsy to wide local excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma may not affect patient survival. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147:48‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Basnet A, Wang D, Sinha S, Sivapiragasam A. Effect of a delay in definitive surgery in melanoma on overall survival: a NCDB analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:e21586. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Conic RZ, Cabrera CI, Khorana AA, Gastman BR. Determination of the impact of melanoma surgical timing on survival using the National Cancer Database. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:40‐46.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fischer‐Valuck BW, Michalski JM, Contreras J, et al. A propensity analysis comparing definitive chemo‐radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder vs. urothelial carcinoma of the bladder using the National Cancer Database. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019;15:38‐41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN short‐term recommendations for cutaneous melanoma management during COVID‐19 pandemic. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2020. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.nccn.org/covid-19/pdf/Melanoma.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 40. American College of Mohs Surgery . American College of Mohs Surgery: COVID‐19 (Coronavirus) preparedness. American College of Mohs Surgery; 2020. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://www.mohscollege.org/UserFiles/AM20/Member%20Alert/COVIDAlert3March20.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Karia PS, Han J, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: estimated incidence of disease, nodal metastasis, and deaths from disease in the United States, 2012. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:957‐966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma recurrence, metastasis, and disease‐specific death: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419‐428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ruiz ES, Karia PS, Besaw R, Schmults CD. Performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition vs the Brigham and Women's Hospital Tumor Classification System for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:819‐825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Alam M, Goldberg LH, Silapunt S, et al. Delayed treatment and continued growth of nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:839‐848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Eide MJ, Weinstock MA, Dufresne RG Jr, et al. Relationship of treatment delay with surgical defect size from keratinocyte carcinoma (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin). J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:308‐314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Murphy CT, Galloway TJ, Handorf EA, et al. Survival impact of increasing time to treatment initiation for patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:169‐178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Renzi C, Mastroeni S, Passarelli F, et al. Factors associated with large cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:404‐411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:759‐765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous‐cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:713‐720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Locke J, Karimpour S, Perez CA. Radiotherapy for epithelial skin cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:748‐755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Likhacheva A, Awan M, Barker CA, et al. Definitive and postoperative radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell cancers of the skin: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10:8‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wehner MR, Dalma N, Landefeld C, et al. Natural history of lesions suspicious for basal cell carcinoma in older adults in Ikaria, Greece. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:767‐768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kirkup ME, De Berker DA. Clinical measurement of dimensions of basal cell carcinoma: effect of waiting for elective surgery. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:876‐879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Buck DW 2nd, Kim JY, Alam M, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:861‐866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES