Abstract
The metazoan second messenger 2′3′-cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (cGAMP) is a cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) that induces secretion of type I interferons and activates the immune system and has thus attracted significant interest as a vaccine adjuvant or immunotherapeutic. CDN bisphosphorothioates are of particular interest because of their increased hydrolytic stability and improved cell activities. In our work with CDN bisphosphorothioates, we sought a method for systematic determination of the absolute stereochemistry of their phosphorothioate stereocenters. A novel biocatalytic method employing snake venom phosphodiesterase (svPDE) and nP1 has been developed and successfully applied to stereochemistry determination of 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioates. This method unambiguously assigned the phosphorothioate stereochemistry of four diastereomers of 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate by analyzing distinct hydrolysis patterns of the bisphosphorothioate diastereomers upon incubation with svPDE and nP1. Furthermore, the regiospecificity as well as stereospecificity of both svPDE and nP1 toward 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate has been elucidated.
Introduction
Canonical cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) that possess two 3′–5′ internucleotide linkages, such as cyclic diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP, 1) and cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP, 2), are ubiquitous second messenger molecules in bacteria (Figure 1). The CDNs have been reported to participate in a myriad of signaling pathways in bacteria for the past three decades.1−3 In 2013, cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (cGAMP) was reported as the first metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cGAMP synthase (cGAS).4,5 In contrast to the bacterial CDNs, the metazoan cGAMP was identified to have one 2′–5′ and one 3′–5′ internucleotide linkage, [G(2′–5′)pA(3′–5′)p] (2′3′-cGAMP, 3).6−8 The second messenger 3 induces secretion of type I interferons and activates the immune system; this observation has led to intense interest in CDNs as vaccine adjuvants or immunotherapeutics.9,10 In the field of therapeutics, CDN bisphosphorothioates (CDNSSs) are of particular interest, because the phosphorothioate linkages in CDNSSs confer increased resistance to hydrolysis by phosphodiesterases.11 In addition to their increased hydrolytic stability, CDNSSs are more lipophilic and cell permeable compared to CDNs, thereby offering improved cell activities.11−15
Figure 1.
Structures of c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and 2′3′-cGAMP.
Chemical and biocatalytic syntheses of CDNSSs provide up to four bisphosphorothioate diastereomers depending upon the stereospecificity of the syntheses and the molecular symmetry of CDNSSs.11,16−18 Typically, bisphosphorothioate diastereomers are either chromatographically separated and characterized individually12,14,15,19 or evaluated as a diastereomeric mixture without further purification.11,13 Stereochemistry assignment of the three diastereomers of c-di-GMP bisphosphorothioate, RpRp, RpSp, and SpSp, was reported based on their retention times on reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and 31P NMR chemical shifts.19 This method was also applied in assigning the stereochemistry of 2′3′-CDNSS diastereomers by another group, who confirmed the stereochemistry of a 2′3′-CDNSS diastereomer via an X-ray single-crystal structure.12,20 However, retention times on reverse-phase HPLC and 31P NMR chemical shifts of CDNSSs are often too close from one to another, making unambiguous stereochemistry assignments difficult. In addition, this method relies on relative values of retention times on reverse-phase HPLC and 31P NMR chemical shifts of the bisphosphorothioate diastereomers and thereby requires a full set of three or four diastereomers for the stereochemistry assignment. Occasionally, however, chemical syntheses fail to provide all of the possible bisphosphorothioate diastereomers due to stereoselective chemical steps and difficulty in purification.13 Moreover, biocatalytic syntheses of CDNSSs do not provide all diastereomers because of the intrinsic specificity of the enzymes.11,18,21 Therefore, development of a novel method that enables the unequivocal assignment of the stereochemistry of a given CDNSS would be highly desirable. Herein, a novel unambiguous method of stereochemistry determination of 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate (2′3′-cGSASMP, 4)21,22 employing snake venom phosphodiesterase (svPDE) and nP1 is reported. In addition, the stereospecificity as well as regiospecificity of svPDE and nP1 toward 4 is discussed.
Results and Discussion
Determination of the absolute stereochemistry of phosphorothioate centers utilizing various enzymes has been well established for linear dinucleotide phosphorothioates (DNSs) in the literature.23−26 Two of the most widely used enzymes are snake venom phosphodiesterase (svPDE) and nuclease P1 (nP1). SvPDE cleaves 2′–5′ and 3′–5′ phosphodiester bonds and hydrolyzes Rp phosphorothioates stereospecifically. On the other hand, nP1 specifically hydrolyzes 3′–5′ phosphodiester bonds and Sp phosphorothioates.27 These biocatalytic transformations have been successfully applied in determining the absolute stereochemistry of numerous linear DNSs for decades.28−31 However, enzymatic determination of the stereochemistry of phosphorothioate centers in CDNSS has not been reported in the literature. Application of hydrolytic enzymes to CDNSSs has been limited to demonstrating their resistance to enzymatic hydrolysis and higher cellular activities compared to CDNs.12,13 In fact, application of biocatalysis to CDNSSs in the context of the relative hydrolytic stability between Rp and Sp, let alone the stereochemistry determination, has not been reported. Given that svPDE and nP1 differentially hydrolyze Rp and Sp stereocenters in linear DNSs, we hypothesized that the enzymes might hydrolyze the phosphorothioate centers in CDNSSs regioselectively and stereoselectively, offering an opportunity to develop a novel method of stereochemistry determination of CDNSSs.
To test the hypothesis, four diastereomers of 4 (4a, 4b, 4c, and 4d, whose retention times on HPLC are 6.0, 5.4, 5.3, and 4.9 min, respectively; 50 pmol each) were subjected to svPDE and nP1 hydrolysis conditions (Figure 2). Interestingly, the four diastereomers displayed distinct LC profiles when they were incubated with the enzymes. Diastereomer 4a was hydrolyzed to the monophosphorothioates (MPSs) and the monophosphates (MPs) by svPDE and was resistant to nP1 (Figure 2A). On the other hand, 4b was hydrolyzed to two different sets of linear DNSs by either svPDE or nP1 (Figure 2B). While 4c was resistant to both enzymes, 4d was hydrolyzed to linear DNSs by nP1 and was resistant to svPDE (Figure 2C,D).
Figure 2.
Enzymatic hydrolysis of 2′3′-cGSASMP with svPDE and nP1. LC profiles of 4a (A), 4b (B), 4c (C), and 4d (D) incubated with svPDE and nP1. SvPDE conditions: 2′3′-cGSASMP (0.05 μmol), svPDE (0.008 unit), pH 8.5 buffer solution (0.2 mL), 37 °C, 20 h; nP1 conditions: 2′3′-cGSASMP (0.05 μmol), nP1 (11 unit), pH 7.0 buffer solution (0.2 mL), 37 °C, 20 h. The liquid chromatography (LC) spectra of the starting materials, the reactions after incubation with svPDE, and the reactions after incubation with nP1 are in green, red, and blue, respectively. A fixed amount of 2′3′-isopropylideneadenosine was added to each LC-mass spectrometry (LCMS) sample as a reference (ref). The minor peak on the LC spectrum of 4c incubated with nP1 was from an inseparable impurity in the sample. GMP = guanosine monophosphate, GMPS = guanosine monophosphorothioate, AMP = adenosine monophosphate, AMPS = adenosine monophosphorothioate, MP = monophosphate, and MPS = monophosphorothioate.
Next, the reactions were scaled up for full characterization of the products to decipher the distinct LC patterns. Hydrolysis products of 4b were studied first since 4b was hydrolyzed by both svPDE and nP1, which would offer an insight into the stereospecificity of the enzymes. Incubation of 4b with svPDE and nP1 afforded the distinct linear DNSs 5 and 6, respectively (Scheme 1). The structure of 5 was unambiguously determined to be 5′-pAS(3′–5′)pGS via two-dimensional (2-D) NMR experiments, displaying correlations from H3′A and H5′G to P(3′–5′) in 1H–31P heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) (Figure 3). In the same manner, the structure of 6 was determined to be 5′-pGS(2′–5′)pAS via 2-D NMR experiments. Formation of linear DNSs 5 and 6 indicates that the 2′–5′ phosphorothioate bond of 4b was hydrolyzed by svPDE, while the 3′–5′ phosphorothioate bond was hydrolyzed by nP1. Linear DNSs 5 and 6 were then incubated with the other enzyme, 5 with nP1 and 6 with svPDE, to determine the phosphorothioate stereochemistry. Both 5 and 6 were hydrolyzed to GMP/GMPS and AMP/AMPS by nP1 and svPDE, respectively, which confirmed the stereochemistry of 5 and 6 to be (3′–5′)SP and (2′–5′)RP, respectively (Scheme 1). Taken together, the stereochemistry of 4b was determined to be (2′–5′)RP(3′–5′)SP, which indicates that (2′–5′)RP in 4b was hydrolyzed by svPDE to afford 5 and (3′–5′)SP in 4b was hydrolyzed by nP1 to afford 6.
Scheme 1. Hydrolytic Products of 4b Treated with svPDE and nP1,
svPDE, pH 8.5 buffer solution, 37 °C.
nP1, pH 7.0 buffer solution, 37 °C.
Figure 3.
1H–31P HMBC correlations of 5 and 6.
Biocatalytic hydrolysis products of 4a and 4d by svPDE and nP1 were characterized next. The hydrolysis products of 4a by svPDE were confirmed to be a mixture of mononucleotides 7 and 8 (Scheme 2). The outcome indicates that svPDE hydrolyzed either the (2′–5′)RP or the (3′–5′)RP phosphorothioate linkage in 4a first and then subsequently rapidly hydrolyzed the linear DNS product to the mononucleotides. The resistance of 4a to nP1 also supports the assignment of the 3′–5′ phosphorothioate of 4a to be RP. Taken together, the stereochemistry of 4a was determined to be (2′–5′)RP(3′–5′)RP. Incubation of 4d with nP1 afforded linear DNS 9, whose 5′-pGS(2′–5′)pAS structure was confirmed via 2-D NMR experiments, indicating that (3′–5′)SP in 4d was hydrolyzed by nP1. While 6, the biocatalysis product of 4b by nP1, was hydrolyzed by svPDE, 9 was resistant to svPDE. The results confirmed that the stereochemistry of 9 is (2′–5′)SP and that of 4d is (2′–5′)SP(3′–5′)SP.
Scheme 2. Hydrolytic Products of 4a and 4d Treated with svPDE and nP1,
svPDE, pH 8.5 buffer solution, 37 °C.
nP1, pH 7.0 buffer solution, 37 °C.
Structural determination of the hydrolysis products of 4a, 4b, and 4d demonstrated that (2′–5′)RP and (3′–5′)SP of 4 are hydrolyzed by svPDE and nP1, respectively. Diastereomer 4c was resistant to both enzymes (Figure 2C), which confirms that the stereochemistry of 4c is (2′–5′)SP(3′–5′)RP. The results also indicate that the 3′–5′ phosphorothioate linkage and the 2′–5′ phosphorothioate linkage in 4 are resistant to svPDE and nP1, respectively, regardless of the phosphorothioate stereochemistry. Given the regiospecificity of svPDE, when 4a was incubated with svPDE, the (2′–5′)RP phosphorothioate linkage was hydrolyzed first to afford 5′-pAS(3′–5′)pGS, and then, the (3′–5′)RP phosphorothioate of the resultant linear DNS was subsequently hydrolyzed to afford the mononucleotides.
In the course of determining the phosphorothioate stereochemistry of 4a–4d, the regiospecificity as well as stereospecificity of both svPDE and nP1 toward 4 has been revealed (Table 1). As seen with linear DNSs, svPDE and nP1 preferentially hydrolyzed RP and SP phosphorothioate linkages in 4, respectively. It is interesting to note that svPDE hydrolyzes only (2′–5′)RP phosphorothioate linkages in 4, whereas the enzyme hydrolyzes both (2′–5′)RP and (3′–5′)RP phosphorothioate linkages in linear DNS. On the other hand, nP1 hydrolyzes only (3′–5′)SP phosphorothioate linkages in both 4 and linear DNS. Overall, the assignment of the 4a–4d phosphorothioate stereochemistry completely matches the stereospecificity and the regiospecificity of the svPDE and nP1 biocatalysis as well as the hydrolysis patterns (Table 2). This novel biocatalysis was then applied to ADU-S100 (RPRP 2′3′-c-di-AMPSS), whose stereochemistry had been confirmed by an X-ray single-crystal structure.20 ADU-S100 was hydrolyzed to a mixture of adenosine monophosphorothioate and adenosine monophosphate by svPDE and was resistant to nP1, which is consistent with the (2′–5′)RP/(3′–5′)RP stereochemistry of ADU-S100.
Table 1. Stereospecific and Regiospecific Hydrolysis of 2′3′-cGSASMP (4) and Linear DNS by svPDE and nP1.
| svPDE | nP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 2′3′-cGSASMP | (2′–5′)RP | (3′–5′)SP |
| linear DNS | (2′–5′)RP/(3′–5′)RP | (3′–5′)SP |
Table 2. Stereochemistry Determination of 2′3′-cGSASMPs (4) via Biocatalysis.
| 4a | 4b | 4c | 4d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (2′–5′)P/(3′–5′)P | RPRP | RPSP | SPRP | SPSP |
| svPDE | Mono-Nucs | linear DNS | resistant | resistant |
| nP1 | resistant | linear DNS | resistant | linear DNS |
Conclusions
A novel method of stereochemistry determination of 2′3′-cGSASMP (4) via svPDE and nP1 biocatalysis has been developed. This method unambiguously assigned the phosphorothioate stereochemistry of four diastereomers of 4 by analyzing distinct hydrolysis patterns of the diastereomers incubated with svPDE and nP1. Furthermore, the stereospecificity as well as regiospecificity of both svPDE and nP1 toward 4 has been delineated. This novel method was successfully applied to other 2′3′-CDNSSs for their stereochemistry determination.
Experimental Section
General Information
Commercial reagents were obtained from reputable suppliers and used as received. Reactions were monitored by LC/MS (100 mm × 3 mm 2.7 μm column; 1–98% MeCN/water + 100 mM triethylammonium acetate gradient over 12 min; 1.0 mL/min flow; electrospray ionization (ESI); negative ion mode; UV detection at 254 nm). The 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz, a 151 MHz, and a 202 MHz Varian spectrometer, respectively. Data for the NMR spectra are reported as follows: chemical shift (δ ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, brs = broad singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, dd = doublet of doublets, m = multiplet), coupling constant (Hz), and integration.
Analytical Biocatalysis with svPDE
A 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate triethylammonium salt diastereomer (10 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 5 μL, 50 pmol) was placed in a vial and concentrated under high vacuum for 1 h. To the residue were added the buffer solution (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mL) and svPDE (Sigma-Aldrich P3243, a vial of ≥0.40 units in 1 mL of water, 40 μL). The reaction mixture was shaken at 37 °C for 20 h. The reaction was analyzed by LC/MS.
Analytical Biocatalysis with nP1
A 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate triethylammonium salt diastereomer (10 mM in DMSO, 5 μL, 50 pmol) was placed in a vial and concentrated under high vacuum for 1 h. To the residue were added the buffer solution (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, 1 mM ZnCl2, 0.2 mL) and nP1 (Sigma-Aldrich N8630, a vial of ≥250 units in 0.125 mL of water, 40 μL). The reaction mixture was shaken at 37 °C for 20 h. The reaction was analyzed by LC/MS.
O-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R)-3-{[(S)-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-(2-Amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methoxy}(sulfanyl)phosphoryl]oxy}-5-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-4-hydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methyl} Dihydrogen Phosphorothioate (5)
To a stirred solution of 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate triethylammonium salt 4b (22 mg, 0.020 mmol) in the buffer solution (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 15 mM MgCl2, 2 mL) was added svPDE (Sigma-Aldrich P3243, a vial of ≥0.40 units in 1 mL of water, 2 mL). The reaction mixture was shaken at 37 °C for 2 days, filtered, and purified by HPLC, eluting acetonitrile/water gradient with 100 mM triethylammonium acetate modifier to afford 5 triethylammonium salt (12 mg, 0.012 mmol, 63% yield) as a white solid. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (ESI) calcd for (C20H25N10O12P2S2) [M – H]− 723.0570, found 723.0554. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 8.63 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 6.02 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.81 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (m, 1H), 4.86 (m, 1H), 4.71 (m, 1H), 4.53 (brs, 2H), 4.34 (brs, 1H), 4.28–4.03 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, D2O) δ 158.79, 155.39, 153.85, 152.65, 151.44, 148.80, 140.03, 137.64, 118.49, 116.23, 87.27, 87.07, 83.57, 83.20, 75.03, 73.75, 73.61, 70.36, 65.24, 63.46. 31P NMR (202 MHz, D2O) δ 55.46, 43.38.
O-{[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2-Amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)-4-{[(R)-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methoxy}(sulfanyl)phosphoryl]oxy}-3-hydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methyl} Dihydrogen Phosphorothioate (6)
To a stirred solution of 2′3′-cGAMP bisphosphorothioate triethylammonium salt 4b (22 mg, 0.020 mmol) in the buffer solution (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, 1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mL) was added nP1 (Sigma-Aldrich N8630, a vial of ≥250 units in 0.125 mL of water, 1.5 mL) over 2 days in three portions (0.5 mL x 3). The reaction mixture was shaken at 37 °C for 2 weeks, filtered, and purified by HPLC, eluting acetonitrile/water gradient with 100 mM triethylammonium acetate modifier to afford 6 triethylammonium salt (7.4 mg, 0.009 mmol, 45% yield) as a white solid. HRMS (ESI) calcd for (C20H25N10O12P2S2) [M – H]− 723.0570, found 723.0570. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 8.36 (s, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 5.97 (brs, 1H), 5.93 (brs, 1H), 5.40 (m, 1H), 4.73 (m, 1H), 4.42–3.891 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, D2O) δ 158.08, 155.25, 153.31, 152.72, 151.23, 148.26, 139.43, 138.05, 118.26, 115.77, 87.79, 86.14, 83.43, 82.60, 77.52, 75.08, 70.09, 69.55, 63.96, 63.79. 31P NMR (202 MHz, D2O) δ 56.53, 42.81.
[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2-Amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)-4-{[(S)-{[(2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methoxy}(sulfanyl)phosphoryl]oxy}-3-hydroxytetrahydro-2-furanyl]methyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (9)
Prepared in analogy to that described for 6 in 78% yield. HRMS (ESI) calcd for (C20H25N10O13P2S) [M – H]− 707.0799, found 707.0807. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.97 (s, 1H), 5.98 (m, 1H), 5.93 (m, 1H), 5.25 (m, 1H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 4.43 (m, 1H), 4.36 (m, 1H), 4.27–3.92 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, D2O) δ 158.18, 155.24, 153.40, 152.70, 151.31, 148.34, 139.27, 138.03, 118.28, 115.86, 87.70, 86.34, 83.45, 82.74, 76.55, 74.82, 70.01, 69.55, 64.53, 63.84. 31P NMR (202 MHz, D2O) δ 55.57, 2.09.
Acknowledgments
J.L. thanks B. Wesley Trotter for careful reading of this manuscript, Lisa Nogle for purification of the compounds, and Wilfredo Pinto for the analytical spectra of key compounds.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01942.
1H, 13C, and 31P NMR, HRMS, and 2-D 1H–31P HMBC spectra for 5, 6, and 9 and LC spectra of ADU-S100 incubated with svPDE and nP1 (PDF)
Author Present Address
§ Analytical R&D, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810, United States.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Ross P.; Weinhouse H.; Aloni Y.; Michaeli D.; Weinberger–Ohana P.; Mayer R.; Braun S.; de Vroom E.; van der Marel G. A.; van Boom J. H.; Benziman M. Regulation of Cellulose Synthesis in Acetobacter Xylinum by Cyclic Diguanylic Acid. Nature 1987, 325, 279–281. 10.1038/325279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Römling U.; Galperin M. Y.; Gomelsky M. Cyclic di–GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial Second Messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 1–52. 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; and references therein.
- Commichau F. M.; Dickmanns A.; Gundlach J.; Ficner R.; Stülke J. A Jack of All Trades: the Multiple Roles of the Unique Essential Second Messenger Cyclic di–AMP. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 97, 189–204. 10.1111/mmi.13026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; and references therein.
- Sun L.; Wu J.; Du F.; Chen X.; Chen Z. J. Cyclic GMP–AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor that Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway. Science 2013, 339, 786–791. 10.1126/science.1232458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J.; Sun L.; Chen X.; Du F.; Shi H.; Chen C.; Chen Z. J. Cyclic GMP–AMP Is an Endogenous Second Messenger in Innate Immune Signaling by Cytosolic DNA. Science 2013, 339, 826–830. 10.1126/science.1229963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao P.; Ascano M.; Wu Y.; Barchet W.; Gaffney B. L.; Zillinger T.; Serganov A. A.; Liu Y.; Jones R. A.; Hartmann G.; Tuschl T.; Patel D. J. Cyclic [G(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′)p] Is the Metazoan Second Messenger Produced by DNA–Activated Cyclic GMP–AMP Synthase. Cell 2013, 153, 1094–1107. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diner E. J.; Burdette D. L.; Wilson S. C.; Monroe K. M.; Kellenberger C. A.; Hyodo M.; Hayakawa Y.; Hammond M. C.; Vance R. E. The Innate Immune DNA Sensor cGAS Produces a Noncanonical Cyclic Dinucleotide that Activates Human STING. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1355–1361. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ablasser A.; Goldeck M.; Cavlar T.; Deimling T.; Witte G.; Röhl I.; Hopfner K. P.; Ludwig J.; Hornung V. cGAS Produces a 29–59–Linked Cyclic Dinucleotide Second Messenger that Activates STING. Nature 2013, 498, 380–384. 10.1038/nature12306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubensky T. W. Jr.; Kanne D. B.; Leong M. L. Rationale, Progress and Development of Vaccines Utilizing STING–Activating Cyclic Dinucleotide Adjuvants. Ther. Adv. Vaccines 2013, 1, 131–143. 10.1177/2051013613501988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; and references therein.
- Corrales L.; Gajewski T. F. Molecular Pathways: Targeting the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) in the Immunotherapy of Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4774–4779. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L.; Yin Q.; Kuss P.; Maliga Z.; Millán J. L.; Wu H.; Mitchison T. J. Hydrolysis of 2′3′–cGAMP by ENPP1 and Design of Nonhydrolyzable Analogs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 1043–1048. 10.1038/nchembio.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubensky T. W. Jr.; Kanne D. B.; Leong M. L. L.; Glickman L. H.; Vance R. E.; Lemmens E. E.. Compositions and Methods for Activating “Stimulator of Interferon Gene”–Dependent Signalling. WO Patent WO2014189805, 2014.
- Lioux T.; Mauny M.–A.; Lamoureux A.; Bascoul N.; Hays M.; Vernejoul F.; Baudru A.–S.; Boularan C.; Lopes–Vicente J.; Qushair G.; Tiraby G. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Cyclic Adenosine–Inosine Monophosphate (cAIMP) Analogs that Activate Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 10253–10267. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altman M. D.; Andresen B.; Chang W.; Childers M. L.; Cumming J. N.; Haidle A. M.; Henderson T. J.; Jewell J. P.; Liang R.; Lim J.; Liu H.; Lu M.; Northrup A. B.; Otte R. D.; Siu T.; Trotter B. W.; Truong Q. T.; Walsh S. P.; Zhao K.. Cyclic Di–Nucleotide Compounds as STING Agonists. WO Patent WO2017027646, 2017.
- Andresen B. M.; Bennett F.; Chang W.; Childers M. L.; Cumming J. N.; Lim J.; Lu M.; Trotter B. W.; Wu W.–L.. Cyclic Di–Nucleotide Compounds as STING Agonists.WO Patent WO2019125974, 2019.
- Clivio P.; Coantic–Castex S.; Guillaume D. (3′–5′)–Cyclic Dinucleotides: Synthetic Strategies and Biological Potential. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 7354–7410. 10.1021/cr300011s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; and references therein.
- Schwede F.; Genieser H. G.; Rentsch A. The Chemistry of the Noncanonical Cyclic Dinucleotide 2′3′–cGAMP and Its Analogs. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 238, 359–384. 10.1007/164_2015_43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; and references therein.
- Davies B. W.; Bogard R. W.; Young T. S.; Mekalanos J. J. Coordinated Regulation of Accessory Genetic Elements Produces Cyclic Di–Nucleotides for V. cholerae Virulence. Cell 2012, 149, 358–370. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao J.; Veliath E.; Kim S.; Gaffney B. L.; Jones R. A. Thiophosphate Analogs of c–di–GMP: Impact on Polymorphism. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2009, 28, 352–378. 10.1080/15257770903044523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrales L.; Glickman L. H.; McWhirter S. M.; Kanne D. B.; Sivick K. E.; Katibah G. E.; Woo S.–R.; Lemmens E.; Banda T.; Leong J. J.; Metchette K.; Dubensky T. W. Jr.; Gajewski T. F. Direct Activation of STING in the Tumor Microenvironment Leads to Potent and Systemic Tumor Regression and Immunity. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1018–1030. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novotná B.; Vaneková L.; Zavřel M.; Buděšínský M.; Dejmek M.; Smola M.; Gutten O.; Tehrani Z. A.; Pimková Polidarová M.; Brázdová A.; Liboska R.; Štěpáne I.; Vavřina Z.; Jandušík T.; Nencka R.; Rulíšek L.; Bouřa E.; Brynda J.; Páv O.; Birkus G. Enzymatic Preparation of 2′–5′,3′–5′–Cyclic Dinucleotides, Their Binding Properties to Stimulator of Interferon Genes Adaptor Protein, and Structure/Activity Correlations. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 10676–10690. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong B.; Sun L.; Wei Q.; Dai Y.; Chen C.; Chen Z.. Cyclic Di–Nucleotide Compounds and Methods of Use.WO Patent WO2017161349, 2017.
- Burgers P. M. J.; Sathyanarayana B. K.; Saenger W.; Eckstein F. Crystal and Molecular Structure of Adenosine 5′-O-Phosphorothioate O–p–Nitrophenyl Ester (Sp Diastereomer). Eur. J. Biochem. 1979, 100, 585–591. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb04205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgers P. M. J.; Eckstein F. Absolute Configuration of the Diastereomers of Adenosine 5′-O-(1–thiotriphosphate): Consequences for the Stereochemistry of Polymerization by DNA–Dependent RNA Polymerase from Escherichia Coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1978, 75, 4798–4800. 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eckstein F. Phosphorothioate Analogues of Nucleotides–Tools for the Investigation of Biochemical Processes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1983, 22, 423–439. 10.1002/anie.198304233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Eckstein F. Nucleoside Phosphorothioates. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1985, 54, 367–402. 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.002055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pino S.; Ciciriello F.; Costanzo G.; Di Mauro E. Nonenzymatic RNA Ligation in Water. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 36494–36503. 10.1074/jbc.M805333200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson P. S.; Bach C. T.; Verheyden J. P. H. Synthesis of P–Thioadenylyl–(2′–5′)–adenosine and P–Thioadeny1y1–(2′–5′)–P–thioadenylyl–(2′–5′)–adenosine. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2314–2317. 10.1021/jo00187a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hiresova R.; Putilova L.; Kullberg M.; Stawinski J. Determination of Absolute Configuration of Nucleoside 3′–H–Phosphonothioate Monoesters via Stereochemical Correlation Analysis. Collect. Symp. Ser. 2005, 7, 201–205. 10.1135/css200507201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. A.; Gaffney B. L.. Synthesis of Cyclic Diguanosine Monophosphate and Thiophosphate Analogs Thereof. WO Patent WO2011003025, 2011.
- Tomaszewska A.; Guga P.; Stec W. J. Diastereomerically Pure Nucleoside–5′-O- (2–thio–4,4–pentamethylene–1,3,2–oxathiaphospholane)s–Substrates for Synthesis of P–Chiral Derivatives of Nucleoside–5′-O-phosphorothioates. Chirality 2011, 23, 237–244. 10.1002/chir.20905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







