Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Jun 3;5(23):14006–14012. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01404

Thermally Conductive Elastomer Composites with Poly(catechol-polyamine)-Modified Boron Nitride

Xinyang Liu , Qiaoyu Han , Dan Yang †,‡,*, Yufeng Ni †,, Liyuan Yu †,, Qungui Wei †,, Liqun Zhang §
PMCID: PMC7301587  PMID: 32566867

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c01404_0010.jpg

Effective heat dissipation has become a major concern with the rapid development of microelectronic devices. In general, thermally conductive fillers are incorporated into the polymeric matrix to increase the thermal conductivity of polymer composites. Herein, poly(catechol-polyamine) (PCPA) is employed to modify boron nitride (BN) platelets, referred to as BN-PCPA, and improves the interfacial compatibility between a thermally conductive filler and elastomer matrix, resulting in carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) composites filled with BN-PCPA platelets with enhanced thermal conductivity. The influence of PCPA thickness on the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and dielectric properties of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites is systematically studied. Briefly, the interfacial compatibility between the BN-PCPA filler and XNBR matrix increases with increasing PCPA thickness, leading to enhanced thermal conductivity. The maximum thermal conductivity of 0.399 W/(m·K) has been rendered by the BN-PCPA-12h/XNBR composite, which is about 2.5 times of pure XNBR. This work provides an easy route to develop polymer composites with a relatively high thermal conductivity and high dielectric constant for potential application in practical electronic packaging.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of miniaturized electronic devices, effective heat dissipation becomes a major concern.1,2 Various polymeric materials are widely used in electronic devices and communication equipment due to the easiness of processing, light weight, high resistivity, and excellent corrosion resistance. However, most of the polymers render inferior thermal conductivity, hindering large-scale utilization in various applications.35 In general, thermally conductive fillers are incorporated into the polymeric matrix, such as metal oxides,68 metal nitrides,9,10 and carbonaceous materials,1113 to enhance the thermal conductivity of polymer-based materials. The ceramic thermally conductive fillers, such as Al2O3,7 SiC,14,15 and ZnO,8 can improve the thermal conductivity of polymer composites and keep their insulation. However, the carbon materials, such as CNTs16 and graphene,17 can not only improve thermal conductivity but also enhance the electrical conductivity of polymer composites, which is not applicable to thermally conductive materials used in insulated occasions.

Boron nitride (BN) is a promising thermally conductive filler due to its lubrication, electrical insulation, chemical corrosion resistance, and good thermal conductivity.1820 Moreover, BN/polymer composites exhibit a low coefficient of thermal expansion.21 However, the homogenous dispersion of BN platelets in the polymeric matrix is a difficult issue due to its high surface energy, resulting in inferior interfacial adhesion and high thermal resistance. Therefore, the filler surface is needed to be modified to ensure excellent dispersion22,23 and enhance the thermal conductivity and mechanical properities of BN/polymer composites.24

In previous studies, different approaches have been adopted to modify the surface of BN.20,2527 For instance, Xie et al.28 treated BN with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and heated in an autoclave under continuous stirring. The H2O2-modified BN (m-BN) was added into the polyvinyl alcohol matrix to prepare a thermally conductive composite, resulting in a thermal conductivity of 3.92 W/(m·K) at a m-BN content of 10 wt %. The enhanced thermal conductivity was ascribed to the improved compatibility between the inorganic filler and organic material. Qin et al.22 modified BN by a silane coupling agent to prepare thermally conductive polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composites via bulk polymerization. The maximum thermal conductivity was found to be 0.53 W/(m·K) by the PMMA composites with the addition of 16 wt % modified BN, which is 2.8 times higher than the pure PMMA. Zhang et al.29 modified BN with dopamine and a decorated BN surface with silver nanoparticles, denoted as AgNPs/h-BN, resulting in AgNPs/h-BN/polyethylene naphthalate composites with a high thermal conductivity of 0.921 W/(m·K).

Recently, poly(dopamine) (PDA) is being investigated as a surface modification agent for inorganic fillers due to its excellent adhesion.20,24,30 The researchers found that the catechol groups and the cross-linked network in PDA are two key factors for the excellent adhesion of PDA.31,32 However, the high price of dopamine restricts its wide industrial applications.31 Luckily, the catechol and polyamine were found to polymerize in weak alkaline buffer solution and form a poly(catechol/polyamine) (PCPA) network on the surface of substrates, which exhibited an adhesive property similar to that of PDA.3133

Herein, the reaction products of catechol and polyamine were employed to form a PCPA layer on the surface of BN, denoted as BN-PCPA. Then, the as-prepared BN-PCPA was added into the carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) matrix to prepare thermally conductive composites. Due to the enhanced interfacial compatibility between the BN-PCPA filler and XNBR matrix, the interfacial thermal resistance in composites was decreased. Moreover, different thicknesses of the PCPA layer were developed on the BN surface by controlling the reaction time of PCPA. The influence of the PCPA thickness on mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and dielectric properties of XNBR composites has been systematically studied.

2. Results and Discussion

The schematic illustration of PCPA layer formation on the BN surface is shown in Figure 1a, and the corresponding reaction mechanism is presented in Figure 1b. The catechol was oxidized into quinoid structures in an alkaline buffer solution, and then, the quinoid structures formed a cross-linked PCPA network via the Michael addition or Schiff base reaction with amine (TEPA).31 The catechol groups in polyphenols can adhere tightly to the surface of the substrates via covalent and noncovalent bonds with excellent adhesion properties.34 During latex compounding, the strong interaction force may be formed between carboxyl groups of XNBR and imino groups and phenolic hydroxyl groups of BN-PCPA.30 Different thicknessnes of the PCPA layer were developed by controlling the reaction time of PCPA. With the reaction time increased, the number of strong interfacial forces increased, leading to a stronger interfacial adhesion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic illustration of the formation of the PCPA layer on the BN surface and (b) possible reaction mechanism of PCPA formation.

The surface elements of BN and BN-PCPA platelets were investigated via XPS, and the results are shown in Figure 2. One should note that the intensity of the C 1s peak significantly increases after PCPA modification, confirming the presence of PCPA on the BN surface. In addition, compared with pristine BN platelets, the high-resolution C 1s spectra of BN-PCPA platelets exhibit an increased intensity of the C–N peak (285.5 eV) and a newly added C=O peak (288.1 eV), suggesting the successful incorporation of PCPA on the BN surface. Moreover, the intensity of the C–O peak gradually increases with the increase of modification time, which implies an increase of the PCPA content on the BN surface.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Wide-range and high-resolution C 1s XPS spectra of (a) BN, (b) BN-PCPA-3h, (c) BN-PCPA-6h, (d) BN-PCPA-9h, and (e) BN-PCPA-12h platelets.

The surface morphology of pristine BN and BN-PCPA platelets were observed by HR-TEM. Figure 3a shows that the pristine BN exhibits a smooth surface, whereas a thin coating layer is observed on the surface of BN-PCPA platelets (Figure 3b–f). Also, the thickness of the PCPA layer increases with increasing modification time. It is easy to find that the thickness of PCPA on BN-PCPA-3h, BN-PCPA-6h, BN-PCPA-9h, and BN-PCPA-12h platelets are 1.1, 2.1, 3, and 4 nm, respectively. The content of the PCPA layer on the BN surface that increases with increasing modification time is also demonstrated by the TGA curves, and the results are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the mass residue of BN, BN-PCPA-3h, BN-PCPA-6h, BN-PCPA-9h, and BN-PCPA-12h platelets are 99.29, 98.23, 97.67, 97.17, and 96.93%, respectively, at 800 °C. The decreased mass residue of BN-PCPA with increasing modification time means that the weight content of the PCPA layer increases with increasing modification time.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HR-TEM images of (a) BN, (b) BN-PCPA-3h, (c) BN-PCPA-6h, (d) BN-PCPA-9h, and (e) BN-PCPA-12h platelets.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

TGA curves of BN, BN-PCPA-3h, BN-PCPA-6h, BN-PCPA-9h, and BN-PCPA-12h platelets.

The microstructure of BN/XNBR and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites were observed by SEM, as shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a shows that the BN/XNBR composite contains some defects due to the poor interfacial compatibility between pristine BN and the XNBR matrix. In general, an inorganic filler will aggregate and form aggregates in the polymer matrix due to their large specific surface area and surface energy. When the BN/XNBR composites were fractured at the liquid nitrogen temperature, the inorganic BN platelets were peeled off from the XNBR matrix, which resulted in defects at the cross section. However, the size of defects is significantly decreased in the BN-PCPA/XNBR composites. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the improved interfacial interaction between the XNBR rubber matrix and BN-PCPA filler, which resulted in less BN-PCPA platelets being peeled from the XNBR matrix. In addition, the size of BN-PCPA aggregates in BN-PCPA/XNBR composites is decreased with increasing modification time, which maybe ascribed to the interfacial adhesion increases with increasing thickness of the PCPA layer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SEM images of (a) BN/XNBR, (b) BN-PCPA-3h/XNBR, (c) BN-PCPA-6h/XNBR, (d) BN-PCPA-9h/XNBR, and (e) BN-PCPA-12h/XNBR composites.

The mechanical properties of pure XNBR and XNBR composites are displayed in Figure 6 and Table 1. Compared with the BN/XNBR composite with the same filler content, the tensile strength of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites are obviously improved, which is due to the enhanced interfacial adhesion between the thermally conductive filler and rubber matrix. However, the tensile strength of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites decreases with increasing modification time. There are two reasons to explain this phenomenon. First, the relatively soft PCPA layer coating on the BN platelets increases the whole content of the polymeric phase in the composites.35 Second, with the PCPA coated on the surface of BN, the reinforcing effect of BN-PCPA toward the XNBR matrix is much less than that of pristine BN platelets.36 In addition, the detailed mechanical properties, including tensile strength, elastic modulus, and elongation at break of pure XNBR and XNBR composites, are displayed in Table 1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Stress–strain curves of pure XNBR and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites.

Table 1. Mechanical, Dielectric, and Thermal Conductive Properties of Pure XNBR and XNBR Composites.

sample dielectric constant (100 Hz) tensile strength (MPa) elongation at break (%) elastic modulus (MPa) thermal conductivity (W/(m·K)) k*eff R*c
pure XNBR 12.87 2.59 233.9 2.06 0.162 1.0000  
BN/XNBR 8.36 4.32 125.8 15.24 0.355 2.1885 0.02778
BN-PCPA-3h/XNBR 9.50 8.20 122.9 14.65 0.362 2.2348 0.02674
BN-PCPA-6h/XNBR 9.24 7.25 131.8 14.10 0.364 2.2397 0.02663
BN-PCPA-9h/XNBR 9.14 6.65 130.1 13.20 0.375 2.3124 0.02512
BN-PCPA-12h/XNBR 8.86 6.54 164.3 10.98 0.399 2.4584 0.02239

Figure 7 shows the frequency dependence of the dielectric constant (εr) and dielectric loss tangent (tanδ) of pure XNBR, BN/XNBR, and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites at room temperature. As shown in Figure 7a, the εr is decreased with increased frequency because the polarization of samples do not match the applied frequency. Moreover, the εr of BN/XNBR and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites is found to be lower than that of pure XNBR, which can be ascribed to the lower εr of BN than XNBR.18 The εr of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites gradually decreases with increasing PCPA modification time. For example, the εr of the XNBR composite filled with 30 vol% BN-PCPA-3h is 9.5 at 100 Hz, while the εr of the 30 vol % BN-PCPA-12h/XNBR composite decreases to 8.86 at 100 Hz, as shown in Table 1. One should note that the enhanced interfacial adhesion between the BN-PCPA filler and XNBR matrix limits the orientation polarization of polar groups in XNBR.37 In addition, the εr of the BN/XNBR composite is found to be smaller than that of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites, which can be ascribed to the inferior compatibility between pristine BN and the XNBR matrix and the presence of defects, decreasing the interface polarization of the composite. Figure 7b shows that the tanδ initially decreases with the increasing frequency followed by a gradual increase. One should note that the major polarization contribution in XNBR composites is rendered by interfacial polarization under low frequencies, whereas the dipolar relaxation becomes the dominant polarization force under high frequencies.38 However, the tanδ of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites remains lower than 0.55 at 10 Hz, which is highly advantageous for electronic devices.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Influence of frequency on (a) dielectric constant and (b) dielectric loss tangent of pure XNBR, BN/XNBR, and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites.

The thermal conductivity of XNBR, BN/XNBR, and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites are presented in Figure 8 and Table 1. It can be seen that the thermal conductivity of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites are higher than the BN/XNBR composite and pure XNBR. As mentioned earlier, the PCPA modification facilitates the dispersion of BN in the XNBR matrix and, in turn, reduces the interfacial thermal resistance, forming an efficient heat conduction network (Figure 9). The decreased phonon scattering and acoustic impedance mismatch at the interface between the conductive filler and polymeric matrix is beneficial for forming the thermal transport in composites. The polar groups in PCPA on the surfaces of BN-PCPA could form strong adhesion with XNBR, thus decreasing the acoustic impedance mismatch and interfacial thermal resistance. Moreover, the thermal conductivity increases with increasing modification time. This phenomenon can be explained by the larger number of polar groups on BN-PCPA plateles, leading to larger interfacial adhesion and lower interfacial thermal resistance, thus resulting in larger thermal conductivity. The maximum thermal conductivity of 0.399 W/(m·K) has been rendered by the BN-PCPA-12 h/XNBR composite, which is 2.5 times of pure XNBR.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Thermal conductivity of XNBR, BN/XNBR, and BN-PCPA/XNBR composites.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Schematic illustration of heat transport models of the BN/XNBR and BN-PCPA/XNBR composite.

To understand the changing of interface thermal resistance between BN platelets and the XNBR matrix, the modified Hashin–Shtrikman model39 (eq 1) was used to fit the experimental conductivity coefficient (k*eff) of XNBR composites (Table 1).

2. 1

where H is 0.204, J is 2.8521, ϕ1 is the volume fraction of the filler, κ1 is the thermal conductivity ratio of the filler to the polymeric matrix, and K is the coefficient associated with the total thermal resistance of polymer composites that is related to following equation

2. 2

As shown in Table 1, the R*c of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites are lower than that of the BN/XNBR composite and the R*c of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites decrease with increasing PCPA modification time. The results suggest that the PCPA layer on the surface effectively reduced the interfacial thermal resistance between the BN platelets and XNBR matrix.

3. Conclusions

In summary, the PCPA was employed to modify the surface of BN and increased the thermal conductivity of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites. The PCPA modification improved the interfacial compatibility between the thermally conductive filler and rubber matrix, leaded to a good dispersion of BN-PCPA in the XNBR matrix. Moreover, the thermal conductivity of BN-PCPA/XNBR composites increased with increasing modification time due to the reduced interfacial thermal resistance and formation of a heat conduction network. The maximum thermal conductivity of 0.399 W/(m·K) has been rendered by BN-PCPA-12 h/XNBR composites, which was about 2.5 times of pure XNBR. This work provides an easy route to develop polymer composites with a relatively high thermal conductivity and high dielectric constant for potential application in practical electronic packaging.

4. Methods

4.1. Materials

BN platelets (3 μm) were obtained from Beijing Huake Chemical Co., Ltd. (China). XNBR was purchased from Zeon Chemicals Yonezawa Co., Ltd. (China). Other reactants were obtained from the Beijing Chemical Plant (China).

4.2. BN-PCPA/XNBR Composite Preparation

BN-PCPA platelets were prepared by dispersing 4 g of BN into 100 mL of deionized (DI) water, and Tris–HCl was used to adjust the pH to 9.5. Then, 0.5 g of catechol and 1.5 g of tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) were added into the above reaction system and mechanically stirred for 3, 6, 9, or 12 h at 40 °C. Once the reaction was completed, the modified BN was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven.

Then, XNBR composites were fabricated by mixing 98 g of BN or BN-PCPA platelets and 222 g of XNBR emulsion with a solid content of 45 wt % by using the emulsion co-coagulation method with the content of BN or BN-PCPA filler (30 vol%). The largest amount of the filler was 30 vol% because the higher content of the filler made the entire system become viscous, which restricted the movement and orientation of BN-PCPA in the composites and decreased the flexibility of polymer composites, thus limiting their wide application as thermal management materials. Afterward, a certain content of a dicumyl peroxide curing agent was uniformly mixed into XNBR composites through a double-roll open mill. After 8 h, the as-prepared compound was vulcanized at 160 °C to obtain cured composites.

4.3. Material Characterization

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on TA SDT650 thermal analysis mass spectrometry under nitrogen. The surface composition of BN and BN-PCPA was conducted via an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Electron Corporation) system by using ESCALAB 250. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI Quattro S field-emission microscope) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM; Hitachi H9000 microscope) were utilized to observed the microsturcture of samples. An Instron 3366 tensile apparatus was used to measure the stress–strain curves at a speed of 50 mm/min. The elastic modulus values of samples were determined by the slopes of stress–strain curves at 10% strain. The dielectric behavior of composites was determined by using a broadband dielectric spectrometer (Novocontrol, Alpha-A, GmbH Germany). The thermal conductivity of the sample with a diameter of 20 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was characterized via a DRL-III flat thermal conduction instrument (Xiangtan, China). The following equation was as follows

4.3. 3

where λ, Q, X, and A were the thermal conductivity W/(m·K), heat flux (W), thickness (m), and area (m2) of the samples, respectively. ΔT was the temperature difference.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51873022), the Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the period of 13th five-year plan (CIT&TCD201904046), and the Undergraduate URT project (no. 2020X00036).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Moore A. L.; Shi L. Emerging Challenges and Materials for Thermal Management of Electronics. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 163–174. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Donnay M.; Tzavalas S.; Logakis E. Boron Nitride Filled Epoxy with Improved Thermal Conductivity and Dielectric Breakdown Strength. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 110, 152–158. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen J.; Huang X.; Sun B.; Wang Y.; Zhu Y.; Jiang P. Vertically Aligned and Interconnected Boron Nitride Nanosheets for Advanced Flexible Nanocomposite Thermal Interface Materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 30909–30917. 10.1021/acsami.7b08061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou Y.; Chen Y.; Wang H.; Wong C. P. Creation of a Multilayer Aluminum Coating Structure Nanoparticle Polyimide Filler for Electronic Applications. Mater. Lett. 2014, 119, 64–67. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gu J.; Lv Z.; Wu Y.; Guo Y.; Tian L.; Qiu H.; Li W.; Zhang Q. Dielectric Thermally Conductive Boron Nitride/Polyimide Composites with Outstanding Thermal Stabilities via In -Situ Polymerization-electrospinning-hot Press Method. Compos. Part A 2017, 94, 209–216. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang Z.-H.; Lu Y.-L.; Liu J.; Dang Z.-M.; Zhang L.-Q.; Wang W. Preparation of Nanoalumina/EPDM Composites with Good Performance in Thermal Conductivity and Mechanical Properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 2302–2310. 10.1002/pat.1761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zha J.-W.; Zhu Y.-H.; Li W.-K.; Bai J.; Dang Z.-M. Low Dielectric Permittivity and High Thermal Conductivity Silicone Rubber Composites with Micro-Nano-Sized Particles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 062905. 10.1063/1.4745509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fang L.; Wu W.; Huang X.; He J.; Jiang P. Hydrangea-Like Zinc Oxide Superstructures for Ferroelectric Polymer Composites with High Thermal Conductivity and High Dielectric Constant. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 107, 67–74. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Y.; Qiao X.; Wan J.; Xiao Y.; Fan X. Preparation of AlN Microspheres/UHMWPE Composites for Insulating Thermal Conductors. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 80262–80267. 10.1039/C6RA18228C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kusunose T.; Yagi T.; Firoz S. H.; Sekino T. Fabrication of Epoxy/Silicon Nitride Nanowire Composites and Evaluation of Their Thermal Conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 3440. 10.1039/c3ta00686g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tu H.; Ye L. Thermal Conductive PS/Graphite Composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2009, 20, 21–27. 10.1002/pat.1236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Im H.; Kim J. Effect of Homogeneous Al(OH)3 Covered MWCNT Addition on the Thermal Conductivity of Al2O3/Epoxy-Terminated Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 6025–6033. 10.1007/s10853-012-6510-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui X.; Ding P.; Zhuang N.; Shi L.; Song N.; Tang S. Thermal Conductive and Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Composites Based on Solution-Exfoliated Boron Nitride and Graphene Nanosheets: A Morphology-Promoted Synergistic Effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19068–19075. 10.1021/acsami.5b04444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee G.-W.; Park M.; Kim J.; Lee J. I.; Yoon H. G. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Polymer Composites Filled with Hybrid Filler. Compos. Part A 2006, 37, 727–734. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai W.; Yu J.; Wang Y.; Song Y.; Alam F. E.; Nishimura K.; Lin C.-T.; Jiang N. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity for Polyimide Composites with A Three-Dimensional Silicon Carbide Nanowire@Graphene Sheets Filler. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4884–4891. 10.1039/C4TA06417H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho E.-C.; Chang-Jian C.-W.; Hsiao Y.-S.; Lee K.-C.; Huang J.-H. Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube Based Polymer Composites for Thermal Management. Compos. Part A 2016, 90, 678–686. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu K.; Lei C.; Yang W.; Chai S.; Chen F.; Fu Q. Surface Modification of Boron Nitride by Reduced Graphene Oxide for Preparation of Dielectric Material with Enhanced Dielectric Constant and Well-Suppressed Dielectric Loss. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 134, 191–200. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Golberg D.; Bando Y.; Huang Y.; Terao T.; Mitome M.; Tang C.; Zhi C. Boron Nitride Nanotubes and Nanosheets. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2979–2993. 10.1021/nn1006495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shen H.; Cai C.; Guo J.; Qian Z.; Zhao N.; Xu J. Fabrication of Oriented hBN Scaffolds for Thermal Interface Materials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 16489–16494. 10.1039/C6RA00980H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang C.; He Y.; Zhan Y.; Zhang L.; Shi H.; Xu Z. Poly(dopamine) Assisted Epoxy Functionalization of Hexagonal Boron Nitride for Enhancement of Epoxy Resin Anticorrosion Performance. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017, 28, 214–221. 10.1002/pat.3877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhi C.; Bando Y.; Tang C.; Kuwahara H.; Golberg D. Large-Scale Fabrication of Boron Nitride Nanosheets and Their Utilization in Polymeric Composites with Improved Thermal and Mechanical Properties. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2889–2893. 10.1002/adma.200900323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qin L.; Li G.; Hou J.; Yu X.; Ding H.; Zhang Q.; Wang N.; Qu X. Preparation, Characterization, and Thermal Properties of Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Boron Nitride Composites by Bulk Polymerization. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36, 1675–1684. 10.1002/pc.23078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee D.; Song S. H.; Hwang J.; Jin S. H.; Park K. H.; Kim B. H.; Hong S. H.; Jeon S. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites by Mixing Noncovalently Functionalized Boron Nitride Nanoflakes. Small 2013, 9, 2602–2610. 10.1002/smll.201203214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shen H.; Guo J.; Wang H.; Zhao N.; Xu J. Bioinspired Modification of h-BN for High Thermal Conductive Composite Films with Aligned Structure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5701–5708. 10.1021/am507416y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhan Y.; Long Z.; Wan X.; Zhan C.; Zhang J.; He Y. Enhanced Dielectric Permittivity and Thermal Conductivity of Hexagonal Boron Nitride/Poly(arylene ether nitrile) Composites through Magnetic Alignment and Mussel Inspired Co-Modification. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 12109–12119. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan C.; Kou K.; Jia Q.; Zhang Y.; Wu G.; Ji T. Improved Thermal Conductivity and Dielectric Properties of hBN/PTFE Composites via Surface Treatment by Silane Coupling Agent. Compos. Part B 2017, 111, 83–90. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fang H.; Zhang X.; Zhao Y.; Bai S.-L. Dense Graphene Foam and Hexagonal Boron Nitride Filled PDMS Composites with High Thermal Conductivity and Breakdown Strength. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 152, 243–253. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xie B.-H.; Huang X.; Zhang G.-J. High Thermal Conductive Polyvinyl Alcohol Composites with Hexagonal Boron Nitride Microplatelets as Fillers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 85, 98–103. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhan Y.; Ren Y.; Wan X.; Zhang J.; Zhang S. Dielectric Thermally Conductive and Stable Poly(arylene ether nitrile) Composites Filled with Silver Nanoparticles Decorated Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 2021–2029. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ning N.; Ma Q.; Liu S.; Tian M.; Zhang L.; Nishi T. Tailoring Dielectric and Actuated Properties of Elastomer Composites by Bioinspired Poly(dopamine) Encapsulated Graphene Oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 10755–10762. 10.1021/acsami.5b00808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang L.; Shi Y.; Sa R.; Ning N.; Wang W.; Tian M.; Zhang L. Surface Modification of Aramid Fibers by Catechol/Polyamine Codeposition Followed by Silane Grafting for Enhanced Interfacial Adhesion to Rubber Matrix. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 12547–12556. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang H.; Wu J.; Cai C.; Guo J.; Fan H.; Zhu C.; Dong H.; Zhao N.; Xu J. Mussel Inspired Modification of Polypropylene Separators by Catechol/Polyamine for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 5602–5608. 10.1021/am406052u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang L.; Shi Y.; Chen S.; Wang W.; Tian M.; Ning N.; Zhang L. Highly Efficient Mussel-like Inspired Modification of Aramid Fibers by UV-Accelerated Catechol/Polyamine Deposition Followed Chemical Grafting for High-Performance Polymer Composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 583–593. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li L.; Zeng H. Marine Mussel Adhesion and Bio-Inspired Wet Adhesives. Biotribology 2016, 5, 44–51. 10.1016/j.biotri.2015.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang D.; Tian M.; Li D.; Wang W.; Ge F.; Zhang L. Enhanced Dielectric Properties and Actuated Strain of Elastomer Composites with Dopamine-Induced Surface Functionalization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 12276–12284. 10.1039/c3ta12090b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ruan M.; Yang D.; Guo W.; Zhang L.; Li S.; Shang Y.; Wu Y.; Zhang M.; Wang H. Improved Dielectric Properties, Mechanical Properties, and Thermal Conductivity Properties of Polymer Composites via Controlling Interfacial Compatibility with Bio-Inspired Method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 186–195. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsagaropoulos G.; Eisenberg A. Dynamic Mechanical Study of the Factors Affecting the Two Glass Transition Behavior of Filled Polymers. Similarities and Differences with Random Ionomers. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 6067–6077. 10.1021/ma00122a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiao X.; Xu N.; Jiang Y.; Zhang Q.; Yu E.; Yang H. TiO2@Ag/P(VDF-HFP) Composite with Enhanced Dielectric Permittivity and Rather Low Dielectric Loss. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69580–69585. 10.1039/C6RA08259A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ngo I. L.; Prabhakar Vattikuti S. V.; Byon C. A Modified Hashin-Shtrikman Model for Predicting the Thermal Conductivity of Polymer Composites Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Hybrid Fillers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2017, 114, 727–734. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES