Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Jun 4;5(23):14180–14185. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01980

Ultralight Magnetic Nanofibrous GdPO4 Aerogel

Matas Janulevicius †, Vaidas Klimkevičius †, Lina Mikoliunaite †,‡, Bonifacas Vengalis ‡, Rokas Vargalis †, Simas Sakirzanovas †, Valentina Plausinaitiene †, Albinas Zilinskas †, Arturas Katelnikovas †,*
PMCID: PMC7301591  PMID: 32566886

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c01980_0005.jpg

Anisotropic aerogels are promising bulk materials with a porous 3D structure, best known for their large surface area, low density, and extremely low thermal conductivity. Herein, we report the synthesis and some properties of ultralight magnetic nanofibrous GdPO4 aerogels. Our proposed GdPO4 aerogel synthesis route is eco-friendly and does not require any harsh precursors or conditions. The most common route for magnetic aerogel preparation is the introduction of magnetic nanoparticles into the structure during the synthesis procedure. However, the nanofibrous GdPO4 aerogel reported in this work is magnetic by itself already and no additives are required. The hydrogel used for nanofibrous GdPO4 aerogel preparation was synthesized via a hydrothermal route. The hydrogel was freeze-dried and heat-treated to induce a phase transformation from the nonmagnetic trigonal to magnetic monoclinic phase. Density of the obtained magnetic nanofibrous monoclinic GdPO4 aerogel is only ca. 8 mg/cm3.

1. Introduction

An interest in synthesis and development of various rare-earth (RE)-based materials is consistently growing because of successful application of such materials in various high-tech and biomedical fields.1−6 RE orthophosphates possess many beneficial features, such as high thermal (up to 2300 °C) and chemical stability, low solubility, and desirable optical properties [such as high refractive index (YPO4 = 1.76, LaPO4 = 1.85, and GdPO4 = 1.97)].7−9 Additionally, RE-based compounds are often referred as promising hosts for nuclear waste management.10,11

Aerogels are materials with a set of outstanding properties, such as extremely low density, large surface area, and low thermal conductivity. Despite a wide variety of materials that can be processed to very porous and low-density aerogel-like substances, there is still plenty room for specifically tailored and multifunctional systems. Aerogels can be prepared from a variety of different organic and inorganic substances, recent studies even report aerogels prepared from silver and gold.12−14 Aerogel-based materials are considered for application in numerous fields ranging from tissue engineering and biosensing to catalysis and aerospace applications.15−21 Introducing porosity in anisotropically structured magnetic materials would lead to the perfect supports for magnetic separations in biotechnology, environmental fields, or for magnetic field-assisted chemical reactions.22−24 Typically, anisotropic aerogels are made from anisotropic particles (rods, fibers, wires, etc.), which are intertwined in all directions chaotically. The result of such chaotic interweaving of magnetic fibers is fully compensated overall magnetic momentum; therefore, magnetic properties of such an anisotropic aerogel would be significantly quenched.25 Thus, obtaining a magnetic anisotropic aerogel as a homogeneous system with magnetic properties still remains an enormous challenge. Most of the recent papers report magnetic aerogels as composite materials, where magnetic properties are introduced by incorporating magnetic nanoparticles into an originally nonmagnetic aerogel matrix.26−29

RE elements, in turn, can be used to bring a whole new class of aerogels. RE elements would enable us to obtain homogeneous aerogel platforms with both magnetic and optical properties. Such materials could also be used in designing novel composite-based aerogels as templates. For example, Gd3+-containing inorganic materials usually are magnetic because of the strong paramagnetic nature of Gd3+ ions.

Until now, there is only one scientific paper published on RE orthophosphate aerogels by Yorov et al., where the CePO4 aerogel was successfully obtained and characterized.30 However, the CePO4 aerogel synthesis procedure, reported in this work, needed various organic solvents, was very time-consuming (more than 10 days), and required sophisticated supercritical drying in CO2. Thus, the more environmentally friendly and time-effective synthesis route for RE phosphate aerogel preparation still needs to be developed. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, there is no information describing synthesis or preparation of homogeneous anisotropically structured magnetic RE aerogels; therefore, such materials can be referred to as innovation.

The synthetic approach reported in this work can be applied to obtain various composite aerogels by simply incorporating different nanomaterials into the hydrogel, which further is used to produce aerogels. In such a way, gadolinium phosphate-based aerogels can be easily doped with other RE ions in order to tailor or enhance the desired properties.

In this work, we present the unique way for homogeneous fibrous magnetic GdPO4 aerogel preparation. The method is simple, scalable, eco-friendly, and does not require any harsh precursors or conditions. The main characteristics of the synthesized nanofibrous GdPO4 aerogel are also evaluated.

2. Results and Discussion

The evolution of this research started by preparation of GdPO4 nanoparticles with different morphologies via a hydrothermal synthesis route31 at relatively high pH values and different Gd3+/PO43– ratios in the solution. Then, we observed that long and interwoven GdPO4 nanofibers also can be obtained if pH of the synthesis solution is lowered to 7 and the Gd3+/PO43– ratio is fixed to 1 (Section S1 in the Supporting Information). Reducing the pH to 2 yields urchin-like microparticles, as shown in Figure S1a, whereas the increase in pH to 10 yields much shorter nanofibers (see Figure S1b); therefore, they cannot interweave sufficiently enough to form a hydrogel. The stirring should also be avoided because it breaks the delicate nanofibers (see Figure S1c). The synthesis at pH = 7 yielded a nearly transparent hydrogel with the final volume of 10 mL. We have also diluted this hydrogel to 20 and 30 mL before freeze-drying in order to check whether there is any influence to the aerogel formation. The best results were obtained for the 10 mL sample, where no anisotropic pore structures were detected. However, the samples with higher volume possessed the large anisotropic pores formed by ice crystals. This is supported by low-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, as given in Figure S2. Moreover, if the samples were diluted to 30 mL, the aerogel structure collapsed during the freeze-drying procedure. The 10 mL volume hydrogel was washed and freeze-dried resulting in the “as-prepared” aerogel. Subsequently, this aerogel was annealed at 915 °C for 12 h in air in order to induce phase transformation from trigonal to monoclinic. The schematic representation of the synthesis process conducted to obtain GdPO4 nanowires, hydrogel, and aerogel is provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Preparation scheme for the as-prepared aerogel (trigonal phase) and annealed GdPO4 aerogel (monoclinic phase).

Both, the as-prepared and annealed aerogels were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) to evaluate the phase composition and purity. The obtained XRD patterns for the as-prepared and annealed gadolinium phosphate aerogels are given in Figure 2a,b, respectively. XRD analysis reveals that the as-prepared GdPO4 aerogel consists of the pure rhabdophane-type phase with the composition GdPO4·nH2O, which has trigonal lattice symmetry with the space group P3121 (#152) (Figure 2a). In the rhabdophane structure, Gd3+ ions are 8-coordinated with oxygen ions. The resulting polyhedron, in turn, shares edges with four other GdO8 polyhedrons and two PO4 tetrahedra and vertexes with four PO4 tetrahedrons. The visual representation of this building block is given in Figure S3. The lattice parameters of the as-prepared GdPO4 aerogels were also calculated by applying the Le Bail method. The calculations yielded lattice parameters a = 0.6935 nm and c = 0.6349 nm, which are slightly larger than those reported in the reference structure GdPO4·H2O, PDF ICDD 00-039-0232 (a = 0.69055 nm, c = 0.63257 nm).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of the as-prepared (a) aerogel (trigonal phase) and annealed (b) GdPO4 aerogel (monoclinic phase).

One-dimensional growth of the rhabdophane structure is well-known.32 Anisotropic particles (nanorods) of various RE orthophosphates are the result of such an anisotropic growth and are reported in numerous papers and is characteristic structural feature of such compounds.32−34 The crystalline structure of the trigonal rhabdophane phase contains zeolitic channels (pointed out by the black dashed circle in Figure 2a), which accommodate crystalline water, yielding GdPO4·nH2O stoichiometry. Water molecules, accommodated in zeolitic channels, go along the crystalline structure of anisotropic particles (in our case—nanofibers) or to be more exact, along the c-axis of the GdPO4·nH2O structure.31 This crystalline water is responsible for stabilization of the trigonal phase. Therefore, loss of this crystalline water results in phase transformation to monoclinic.35

The anisotropic nature of lanthanide orthophosphates can be related to their crystal structure. From the thermodynamic point of view, the activation energy of growth on the ab-plane is lower in comparison with other crystal planes (ac and bc), implying that the ab-plane is the preferable plane for growth.8 Similarly, Wang et al.32 explain that different chemical potentials on different crystalline planes are responsible for the anisotropic growth rhabdophane phase crystals. According to the Thompson–Gibbs theory, chemical potential is directly proportional to the number of dangling bonds on the particular crystal plane.36 Because the ab-plane (perpendicular to the c-axis) has the largest number of dangling bonds, this plane is preferable for further growth.

Annealing the as-prepared GdPO4 aerogel results in phase transformation from trigonal (rhabdophane) to monoclinic (monazite) with a space group P21/n (#14). The XRD pattern shows that the pure GdPO4 phase is obtained (see Figure 2b). In the monoclinic GdPO4 structure, Gd3+ ions are nine-coordinated forming GdO9 polyhedrons. Each GdO9 polyhedron shares edges with six other GdO9 polyhedrons and two PO4 tetrahedra and vertexes with five PO4 tetrahedrons.37 The visual representation of this building block is given in Figure S4. Calculated lattice parameters for the annealed aerogel are as follows: a = 0.6334 nm, b = 0.6854 nm, c = 0.6664 nm, β = 104.1°, and are very similar to the ones provided in the ICCD database (PDF ICDD-00-032-0386 card) (a = 0.63342 nm, b = 0.68451 nm, c = 0.66525 nm, and β = 104.0°).

It is also necessary to mention that the monoclinic phase is more preferable as it possesses no crystalline water within its structure. The high content of crystalline water within the trigonal rhabdophane structure is known to quench luminescence emission significantly.38,39 Therefore, such a monoclinic phase aerogel is much more suitable to be doped with RE ions to introduce luminescent properties. After annealing of the as-prepared aerogel at several temperatures, we found out that 915 °C is the highest temperature that the aerogel can withstand. Annealing at higher temperature resulted in collapse of the porous aerogel structure. Even samples annealed at 915 °C have already shown some signs of nanofiber melting, as demonstrated in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images given in the Supporting Information Figure S5.

Furthermore, SEM and high-resolution TEM were used for morphological characterization of the as-prepared and annealed GdPO4 aerogel samples. The obtained images are given in Figure 3. Several studies reported that during the annealing process at 900 °C temperature, when phase transformation occurs, anisotropic nanoparticles of trigonal LnPO4 tend to deform and sinter badly.38,40,41 This, however, is not true in our case, where virtually identical morphological features of both the as-prepared and annealed aerogel samples were observed. This can be evaluated from Figure 3. Both GdPO4 aerogels are formed from high-aspect-ratio fibers; therefore, they can be regarded as anisotropic porous structures. High porosity of the structure ensures effective accessibility of the GdPO4 aerogel surface throughout the entire volume. SEM images also revealed that GdPO4 nanofibers within an aerogel structure were randomly woven together, forming a three-dimensional (3D) nanofibrous network. It is necessary to emphasize again that a nanofibrous GdPO4 aerogel withstands the annealing process and phase transformation, while maintaining the original 3D structure undeformed and undamaged.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM and TEM images of the GdPO4 aerogel: as-prepared trigonal (a,c,e) and annealed monoclinic (b,d,f).

The TEM images taken confirm the anisotropic nature of the nanofibrous structure of both the as-prepared and annealed GdPO4 aerogels (see Figures 3c–f and S5). It is evident that fibers wider in diameter consist of axially agglomerated single crystalline nanofibers with a diameter ranging from 5 to 15 nm. TEM analysis of annealed samples has also confirmed that the annealing process causes significant changes in the morphology of nanofiber junctions—they become noticeably more agglomerated. Figure 3c demonstrates that prior to sintering, individual nanofibers were mostly separate throughout the junctions and contact areas. However, TEM images of the annealed aerogel (Figure 3d) show that nanofibers in contact places were more agglomerated and sintered, while in the as-prepared aerogel nanofibers were less affected by agglomeration. This is also supported by numerous TEM images given in Figure S6.

We have also evaluated the surface area and weight of the obtained GdPO4 aerogels because these parameters are often referred to as the main characteristics defining aerogels. The as-prepared GdPO4 aerogel had a density of around 10 mg/cm3 and a specific surface area of around 29 m2/g. On the contrary, the density of the annealed aerogel decreased even more, that is, to around 8 mg/cm3, and the determined specific surface area was around 35 m2/g. It is evident that the specific surface area of annealed GdPO4 aerogels increases. Such an increase in the surface area is a result of crystalline water removal during the calcination step when the trigonal rhabdophane phase transforms to the monoclinic monazite phase. Because the total volume of the annealed aerogel virtually does not change, the weight loss results in the increased surface area.

Because the magnetic properties are the most interesting feature of the reported GdPO4 aerogels, the magnetization measurements were performed in order to analyze magnetic behavior of the annealed GdPO4 aerogel. Figure 4 shows magnetization versus applied field at T = 300 and 80 K of the sample containing randomly oriented fiber-like GdPO4 nanocrystals. We point out the absence of any hysteresis either at 300 or 80 K temperature. The observed nonlinear (S-shaped) magnetization curves have been fitted well using a standard Langevin function42 that is usually used to describe magnetization of superparamagnetic (SPM) systems

2. 1

where N is the number of magnetic nanoparticles in the sample, m is the averaged magnetic moment of a particle, kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, and L(x) is the Langevin function: L(x) = cot h(x) – 1/x. The magnetic moment per nanoparticle of about 762 and 1190 Bohr magnetons at 300 and 80 K, respectively, was estimated in this work and corresponds to the best fitting of the magnetization curves with the Langevin function (see red solid curves in Figure 4). The observed nonlinear M–H relation of the Langevin type and absence of hysteresis certify that the rod-like GdPO4 nanofibers may be considered as a system of SPM particles. A similar nonlinear M–H relation and absence of hysteresis both at RT and low temperatures have been reported earlier for the crystalline GdPO4 material exhibiting the monoclinic crystalline structure and prepared in various forms, namely, polycrystals,43 star-like nanocrystals,44 and Tb- and Eu-doped nanotubes.45,46 It is worth noting, however, that the room-temperature magnetization value, indicated in this work, is by factor 2–5 lower compared to those reported earlier. The observed magnetic properties of the nanotubes is a result of competing antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic interaction of the paramagnetic Gd3+ ions with unpaired inner 4f electrons in the outer orbital in the monoclinic unit cell.43 The reduced magnetization value at room temperature may probably be understood taking into account importance of the surface effects on magnetization of the nanocrystalline material and significant shape anisotropy of the rod-like nanocrystals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Mass magnetization vs magnetic field of the GdPO4 nanotubes. Solid (red) lines show fitting of the experimental data by the Langevin function.

3. Conclusions

In this work, we reported the synthesis and properties of the GdPO4 aerogels composed of nanofiber-like crystals of a monoclinic phase, demonstrating chemical and thermal stability similar to that of a bulk material. Ultralight magnetic fibrous-structured GdPO4 aerogels were prepared by a simple and eco-friendly aqueous hydrothermal synthesis method. The aerogel was produced by freeze-drying the hydrogel of GdPO4 nanofibers, followed by a calcination step at 915 °C for 12 h. Various measurements were conducted to characterize the crystalline phase, structure, morphology, surface area, density, and magnetic properties. After the calcination step, the density of the aerogel decreased from ∼10 to ∼8 mg/cm3. Morphological investigation revealed that both the as-prepared and annealed aerogels are highly anisotropic and possess a highly porous structure formed from the 3D network of overlapping GdPO4 nanowires. The applied calcination step induced phase transformation from trigonal rhabdophane to monoclinic monazite.

One can expect that magnetic GdPO4 aerogels (a promising platform for composite aerogels) are a very interesting class of novel materials because they offer magnetic properties, low density, and large surface area. These properties make GdPO4 aerogels promising candidates in applications such as catalysts, nuclear waste management, electronic devices, neutron-absorbing materials, and so on.

We believe that fibrous, open-pore 3D-structured magnetic materials offer a flexible way for anisotropic texturing under a magnetic field. Magnetic RE orthophosphate-based aerogels offer a unique way for structuring because there is no need to introduce magnetic nanoparticles, leading to a homogeneous system. Finally, we enabled a relatively simple and fast route to obtain RE-based aerogels, which are yet emerging as a new class of materials.

4. Methods

4.1. GdPO4 Nanofiber Preparation

GdPO4 nanofibers were prepared using an adopted procedure described in our previous publication with some minor adjustments.31 The whole procedure in detail is provided in the Supporting Information Section S1. For the instrumental setup used for aerogel characterization, please see the Supporting Information Section S2.

4.2. GdPO4 Aerogel Preparation

About 10 mL of the washed hydrogel was frozen in a freezer for 6 h at −24 °C. The frozen GdPO4 hydrogel (containing GdPO4 nanofibers) was then freeze-dried. As a result, a highly porous aerogel, composed of the 3D network of GdPO4 nanofibers (with a diameter ranging from 5 to 15 nm), was obtained. This aerogel, hereafter, will be referred to as the “as-prepared”. It should also be noted that the total volume of the as-prepared aerogel was virtually the same as the frozen GdPO4 hydrogel, that is, ca. 10 mL. Finally, the as-prepared GdPO4 aerogel was annealed at 915 °C for 12 h in order to induce phase transformation from trigonal to monoclinic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Audrius Drabavicius for TEM imaging.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01980.

  • GdPO4 nanofiber preparation; instrumental setup; SEM images of particles obtained under different pH values; SEM images of aerogels obtained from different volumes of the hydrogel; building block in the trigonal rhabdophane GdPO4·H2O structure; building block in the monoclinic monazite GdPO4 structure; and TEM images (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao0c01980_si_001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

References

  1. Huang H.; Zhu J.-J. The Electrochemical Applications of Rare Earth-Based Nanomaterials. Analyst 2019, 144, 6789–6811. 10.1039/C9AN01562K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu C.; Qu X. Cerium Oxide Nanoparticle: A Remarkably Versatile Rare Earth Nanomaterial for Biological Applications. NPG Asia Mater. 2014, 6, e90 10.1038/am.2013.88. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Külah E.; Marot L.; Steiner R.; Romanyuk A.; Jung T. A.; Wäckerlin A.; Meyer E. Surface Chemistry of Rare-Earth Oxide Surfaces at Ambient Conditions: Reactions with Water and Hydrocarbons. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43369. 10.1038/srep43369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ignjatović N. L.; Mančić L.; Vuković M.; Stojanović Z.; Nikolić M. G.; Škapin S.; Jovanović S.; Veselinović L.; Uskoković V.; Lazić S.; et al. Rare-Earth (Gd3+,Yb3+/Tm3+, Eu3+) Co-Doped Hydroxyapatite as Magnetic, up-Conversion and down-Conversion Materials for Multimodal Imaging. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16305. 10.1038/s41598-019-52885-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kong T.; Zhang C.; Gan X.; Xiao F.; Li J.; Fu Z.; Zhang Z.; Zheng H. Fast Transformation of a Rare-Earth Doped Luminescent Sub-Microcrystal via Plasmonic Nanoislands. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 4338–4342. 10.1039/D0TC00060D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sun C.; Xue D. Perspectives of Multiscale Rare Earth Crystal Materials. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 1838–1852. 10.1039/C8CE02199F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saltmarsh N.; Kumar G. A.; Kailasnath M.; Shenoy V.; Santhosh C.; Sardar D. K. Spectroscopic Characterizations of Er Doped LaPO4 Submicron Phosphors Prepared by Homogeneous Precipitation Method. Opt. Mater. 2016, 53, 24–29. 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fang Y.-P.; Xu A.-W.; Song R.-Q.; Zhang H.-X.; You L.-P.; Yu J. C.; Liu H.-Q. Systematic Synthesis and Characterization of Single-Crystal Lanthanide Orthophosphate Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16025–16034. 10.1021/ja037280d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun C.; Xue D. The Synergy Effect of Rare Earth Cations on Local Structure and PL Emission in a Ce3+:REPO4 (RE = La, Gd, Lu, Y) System. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 7888–7896. 10.1039/C7DT01375B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Terra O.; Clavier N.; Dacheux N.; Podor R. Preparation and Characterization of Lanthanum–Gadolinium Monazites as Ceramics for Radioactive Waste Storage. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 957–967. 10.1039/B212805P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Subramani T.; Rafiuddin M. R.; Shelyug A.; Ushakov S.; Mesbah A.; Clavier N.; Qin D.; Szenknect S.; Elkaim E.; Dacheux N.; et al. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Enthalpies of Formation of Churchite-Type REPO4·2H2O (RE = Gd to Lu) Materials. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 4641–4649. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Du A.; Zhou B.; Zhang Z.; Shen J. A Special Material or a New State of Matter: A Review and Reconsideration of the Aerogel. Materials 2013, 6, 941–968. 10.3390/ma6030941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Qian F.; Troksa A.; Fears T. M.; Nielsen M. H.; Nelson A. J.; Baumann T. F.; Kucheyev S. O.; Han T. Y.-J.; Bagge-Hansen M. Gold Aerogel Monoliths with Tunable Ultralow Densities. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 131–135. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Qian F.; Lan P. C.; Freyman M. C.; Chen W.; Kou T.; Olson T. Y.; Zhu C.; Worsley M. A.; Duoss E. B.; Spadaccini C. M.; et al. Ultralight Conductive Silver Nanowire Aerogels. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 7171–7176. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierre A. C.; Pajonk G. M. Chemistry of Aerogels and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4243–4266. 10.1021/cr0101306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li V. C.-F.; Dunn C. K.; Zhang Z.; Deng Y.; Qi H. J. Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8018. 10.1038/s41598-017-07771-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maleki H.; Shahbazi M.-A.; Montes S.; Hosseini S. H.; Eskandari M. R.; Zaunschirm S.; Verwanger T.; Mathur S.; Milow B.; Krammer B.; et al. Mechanically Strong Silica-Silk Fibroin Bioaerogel: A Hybrid Scaffold with Ordered Honeycomb Micromorphology and Multiscale Porosity for Bone Regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17256–17269. 10.1021/acsami.9b04283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Power M.; Hosticka B.; Black E.; Daitch C.; Norris P. Aerogels as Biosensors: Viral Particle Detection by Bacteria Immobilized on Large Pore Aerogel. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2001, 285, 303–308. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00471-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao B.; Wang I.-W.; Ren L.; Hu J. Catalytic Methane Decomposition over Bimetallic Transition Metals Supported on Composite Aerogel. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 9099–9106. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li K.; Luo Q.; Xu J.; Li K.; Zhang W.; Liu L.; Ma J.; Zhang H. A Novel Freeze-Drying-Free Strategy to Fabricate a Biobased Tough Aerogel for Separation of Oil/Water Mixtures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3779–3785. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Randall J. P.; Meador M. A. B.; Jana S. C. Tailoring Mechanical Properties of Aerogels for Aerospace Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 613–626. 10.1021/am200007n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maleki H.; Durães L.; Costa B. F. O.; Santos R. F.; Portugal A. Design of Multifunctional Magnetic Hybrid Silica Aerogels with Improved Properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 232, 227–237. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.06.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Heiligtag F. J.; Airaghi Leccardi M. J. I.; Erdem D.; Süess M. J.; Niederberger M. Anisotropically Structured Magnetic Aerogel Monoliths. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 13213–13221. 10.1039/C4NR04694C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jung S. M.; Preston D. J.; Jung H. Y.; Deng Z.; Wang E. N.; Kong J. Porous Cu Nanowire Aerosponges from One-Step Assembly and Their Applications in Heat Dissipation. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1413–1419. 10.1002/adma.201504774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi D.; He P.; Lian J.; Chaud X.; Bud’ko S. L.; Beaugnon E.; Wang L. M.; Ewing R. C.; Tournier R. Magnetic Alignment of Carbon Nanofibers in Polymer Composites and Anisotropy of Mechanical Properties. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 064312. 10.1063/1.1861143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Feng T.; Ye X.; Zhao Y.; Zhao Z.; Hou S.; Liang N.; Zhao L. Magnetic Silica Aerogels with High Efficiency for Selective Adsorption of Pyrethroid Insecticides in Juices and Tea Beverages. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 5159–5166. 10.1039/C8NJ05962D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Y.; Liu Q.; Hess A. J.; Mi S.; Liu X.; Chen Z.; Xie Y.; Smalyukh I. I. Programmable Ultralight Magnets via Orientational Arrangement of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles within Aerogel Hosts. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13875–13883. 10.1021/acsnano.9b04818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Faivre D. Dry but Flexible Magnetic Materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 562–563. 10.1038/nnano.2010.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Olsson R. T.; Azizi Samir M. A. S.; Salazar-Alvarez G.; Belova L.; Ström V.; Berglund L. A.; Ikkala O.; Nogués J.; Gedde U. W. Making Flexible Magnetic Aerogels and Stiff Magnetic Nanopaper Using Cellulose Nanofibrils as Templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 584–588. 10.1038/nnano.2010.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yorov K. E.; Shekunova T. O.; Baranchikov A. E.; Kopitsa G. P.; Almásy L.; Skogareva L. S.; Kozik V. V.; Malkova A. N.; Lermontov S. A.; Ivanov V. K. First Rare-Earth Phosphate Aerogel: Sol–Gel Synthesis of Monolithic Ceric Hydrogen Phosphate Aerogel. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018, 85, 574–584. 10.1007/s10971-018-4584-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Janulevicius M.; Klimkevicius V.; Vanetsev A.; Plausinaitiene V.; Sakirzanovas S.; Katelnikovas A. Controlled Hydrothermal Synthesis, Morphological Design and Colloidal Stability of GdPO4·nH2O Particles. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 23, 100934. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang X.; Gao M. A Facile Route for Preparing Rhabdophane Rare Earth Phosphate Nanorods. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 1360–1365. 10.1039/B517179B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yan R.; Sun X.; Wang X.; Peng Q.; Li Y. Crystal Structures, Anisotropic Growth, and Optical Properties: Controlled Synthesis of Lanthanide Orthophosphate One-Dimensional Nanomaterials. Chem.—Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2183–2195. 10.1002/chem.200400649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang Z.; Shi X.; Wang X.; Zhu Q.; Kim B.-N.; Sun X.; Li J.-G. Breaking the Strong 1D Growth Habit to Yield Quasi-Equiaxed REPO4 Nanocrystals (RE = La-Dy): Via Solvothermal Reaction and Investigation of Photoluminescence. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 796–806. 10.1039/c7ce01880k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yan B.; Xiao X. Hydrothermal Synthesis, Microstructure and Photoluminescence of Eu3+-Doped Mixed Rare Earth Nano-Orthophosphates. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1962. 10.1007/s11671-010-9733-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ding M.; Chen D.; Yin S.; Ji Z.; Zhong J.; Ni Y.; Lu C.; Xu Z. Simultaneous Morphology Manipulation and Upconversion Luminescence Enhancement of β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ Microcrystals by Simply Tuning the KF Dosage. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12745. 10.1038/srep12745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Heffernan K. M.; Ross N. L.; Spencer E. C.; Boatner L. A. The Structural Response of Gadolinium Phosphate to Pressure. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 241, 180–186. 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.06.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cho J.; Kim C. H. Solid-State Phase Transformation Mechanism from Hexagonal GdPO4:Eu3+ Nanorods to Monoclinic Nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31385–31392. 10.1039/C4RA03229B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zou X.; He L.; Tan D.; Lei F.; Jiang N.; Zheng Q.; Lin D.; Xu C.; Liu Y. Anneal-Induced Transformation of Phase Structure, Morphology and Luminescence of GdPO4:Sm3+ Nanomaterials Synthesized by a Hydrothermal Method. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 2948–2956. 10.1039/C6DT04583A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang Z.; Li J.-G.; Zhu Q.; Ai Z.; Li X.; Sun X.; Kim B.-N.; Sakka Y. EDTA-Assisted Phase Conversion Synthesis of (Gd0.95RE0.05)PO4 Nanowires (RE = Eu, Tb) and Investigation of Photoluminescence. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 447–457. 10.1080/14686996.2017.1338495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hernández A. G.; Boyer D.; Potdevin A.; Chadeyron G.; Murillo A. G.; de J. Carrillo Romo F.; Mahiou R. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Lanthanide-Doped GdPO4 Nanowires and Nanoparticles for Optical Applications. Phys. Status Solidi A 2014, 211, 498–503. 10.1002/pssa.201300214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gschneidner K. A. Jr.; Pecharsky V. K.; Tsokol A. O. Recent Developments in Magnetocaloric Materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 1479–1539. 10.1088/0034-4885/68/6/r04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang F. F. Y. Magnetic Susceptibilities of Gadolinium Orthophosphate (GdPO4). Phys. Status Solidi B 1966, 14, 193–203. 10.1002/pssb.19660140119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kumar G. A.; Balli N. R.; Kailasnath M.; Mimun L. C.; Dannangoda C.; Martirosyan K. S.; Santhosh C.; Sardar D. K. Spectroscopic and Magnetic Properties of Neodymium Doped in GdPO4 Sub-Micron-Stars Prepared by Solvothermal Method. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 672, 668–673. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Abécassis B.; Lerouge F.; Bouquet F.; Kachbi S.; Monteil M.; Davidson P. Aqueous Suspensions of GdPO4 Nanorods: A Paramagnetic Mineral Liquid Crystal. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 7590–7595. 10.1021/jp303161a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Du Q.; Huang Z.; Wu Z.; Meng X.; Yin G.; Gao F.; Wang L. Facile Preparation and Bifunctional Imaging of Eu-Doped GdPO4 Nanorods with MRI and Cellular Luminescence. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 3934–3940. 10.1039/C4DT03444A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao0c01980_si_001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES