Despite decades of research and adapted antiphage strategies such as CRISPR-Cas systems, virulent phages are still a persistent risk for the milk fermentation industry worldwide, as they can cause manufacturing failures and alter product quality. Phages P738 and D4446 are novel virulent phages that infect the food-grade Gram-positive bacterial species Streptococcus thermophilus. These two related viruses represent a fifth group of S. thermophilus phages, as they are significantly distinct from other known S. thermophilus phages. Both phages share similarities with phages infecting nondairy streptococci, suggesting their recent emergence and probable coexistence in dairy environments. These findings highlight the necessity of phage surveillance programs as the phage population evolves in response to the application of antiphage strategies.
KEYWORDS: CRISPR, CRISPR-Cas, Streptococcus thermophilus, tail protein, bacteriophage morphogenesis, bacteriophages, electron microscopy, evolution, genomic analysis, lactic acid bacteria
ABSTRACT
Streptococcus thermophilus is a lactic acid bacterium commonly used for the manufacture of yogurt and specialty cheeses. Virulent phages represent a major risk for milk fermentation processes worldwide, as they can inactivate the added starter bacterial cells, leading to low-quality fermented dairy products. To date, four genetically distinct groups of phages infecting S. thermophilus have been described. Here, we describe a fifth group. Phages P738 and D4446 are virulent siphophages that infect a few industrial strains of S. thermophilus. The genomes of phages P738 and D4446 were sequenced and found to contain 34,037 and 33,656 bp as well as 48 and 46 open reading frames, respectively. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that the two phages are closely related to each other but display very limited similarities to other S. thermophilus phages. In fact, these two novel S. thermophilus phages share similarities with streptococcal phages of nondairy origin, suggesting that they emerged recently in the dairy environment.
IMPORTANCE Despite decades of research and adapted antiphage strategies such as CRISPR-Cas systems, virulent phages are still a persistent risk for the milk fermentation industry worldwide, as they can cause manufacturing failures and alter product quality. Phages P738 and D4446 are novel virulent phages that infect the food-grade Gram-positive bacterial species Streptococcus thermophilus. These two related viruses represent a fifth group of S. thermophilus phages, as they are significantly distinct from other known S. thermophilus phages. Both phages share similarities with phages infecting nondairy streptococci, suggesting their recent emergence and probable coexistence in dairy environments. These findings highlight the necessity of phage surveillance programs as the phage population evolves in response to the application of antiphage strategies.
INTRODUCTION
As the most abundant and diverse biological entities, phages adapt and thrive in a vast array of ecological niches (1). The dairy industry is no exception, and the emergence of new phages represents an important threat for milk fermentation processes (2). Streptococcus thermophilus is a lactic acid bacterium widely used as a starter culture for yogurt and cheese production. Infection of this bacterium by strictly lytic (virulent) phages is the main factor impairing milk fermentation, thereby reducing factory productivity and product quality. All S. thermophilus phages characterized so far belong to the Siphoviridae family of the Caudovirales order, which are phages with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome and noncontractile tails (3, 4). Historically, S. thermophilus phages have been classified into two main genera based on their mode of DNA packaging and the composition of their structural proteins (5). These groups include the so-called cos-type phages (Sfi21dt1virus) with cohesive genome extremities and the pac-type phages (Sfi11virus) that package their DNA via a headful mechanism (5). In addition, two new groups of phages infecting S. thermophilus have recently emerged, the 5093 phage group, which shares homologies with nondairy streptococcal prophages (6), and the 987 group (7). Interestingly, the 987 group is likely the result of recombination events between phages infecting S. thermophilus and Lactococcus lactis, another lactic acid bacterium widely used by the dairy industry to make cheeses (7). The emergence of the 5093- and 987-like phages with genes likely originating from lactococcal or nondairy streptococcal phages highlights the genomic mosaicity and diversity of S. thermophilus phages (6, 7).
Comparative genomic analyses have suggested that dairy streptococcal phages evolve via modular exchange (8–11). Such exchange between phages by homologous, illegitimate, or site-specific recombination drives genomic evolution (12–14). Diversity assessment is essential for investigating phage-host interactions and for identifying strategies to limit phage proliferation in industrial settings. Particular attention is given to understanding the host range of these phages for appropriate selection of S. thermophilus strains (15–17).
Fighting diverse and ubiquitous enemies is no easy task, and the dairy industry has developed many strategies to limit phage outbreaks. To control S. thermophilus phages, these strategies mostly rely on the natural selection of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants (BIMs), as well as the establishment of a rotation of bacterial strains that have nonoverlapping phage sensitivities (17). BIMs are spontaneous phage-resistant derivatives that have survived exposure to virulent phages (18). The selection of these mutants suggests taking advantage of different phage resistance mechanisms. For example, some of them may have mutations at the phage receptor level (19) or other host factors (20). However, many of these BIMs are obtained via their CRISPR-Cas systems (21). CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive system that acts as an immune memory, allowing recognition and cleavage of foreign nucleic acids (22). Two type II-A systems, CRISPR1 (CR1) and CRISPR3 (CR3), are usually active in S. thermophilus strains (23), with the CR1 system being found in almost all strains. The exploitation of these natural defense mechanisms led to the development of industrial strains resistant to a wide variety of phages. Some S. thermophilus strains may also be partially resistant to lytic phages due to the presence of innate defenses such as restriction-modification systems (24, 25). Superinfection exclusion (Sie) systems (26) or cryptic prophages in the bacterial genome (27) can also provide some antiviral protection.
Streptococcal phages can overcome the above resistance mechanisms through a variety of means. Nucleotide mutations or deletion as well as modular exchanges may allow a phage to circumvent the protection provided by the CRISPR-Cas system (21, 28–30). Phages can also produce anti-CRISPR proteins that block CRISPR-Cas activity (31, 32).
Here, we describe two members of a new genus of S. thermophilus phages, including their morphology, genomic organization, and phylogenetic relationships with other phages.
RESULTS
Phage isolation and plaque size.
Phages P738 and D4446 were isolated independently. Phage D4446 was isolated from a dairy sample from Senegal using S. thermophilus strain DGCC7891 as the host. Phage P738 was similarly isolated in Germany using the S. thermophilus host strain S4. Both S. thermophilus strains are sensitive to both phages. These phages were propagated at 42°C on their original host strain and produced different plaque sizes depending on their host. Phage P738 produced small turbid plaques (diameter, <1 mm) on strain S4 at 42°C, but when the incubation temperature was lowered to 30°C, larger plaques were observed (diameter, ≥3 mm). Phage D4446 exhibited medium-sized plaques (1 to 3 mm) on strain DGCC7891 at both temperatures. The plaque size phenotype was host-dependent, as phage P738 exhibited medium-size plaques on DGCC7891 at 30°C and 42°C, while phage D4446 produced smaller plaques on S4 at 42°C. It is unclear at this time what the reasons are for the observed temperature effect on phage plaque development, but it is likely related to the host biology and growth parameters affecting the phage lytic cycle.
Phage morphology.
A sample of each CsCl-purified phage was analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), showing that both phages belong to the Siphoviridae family (Fig. 1). They have similar capsid diameters, estimated at 56 nm connected to a noncontractile tail of 124 nm long (Fig. 1). The tail length is similar to that of S. thermophilus phages of the 987 type, which also have a shorter tail (120 to 150 nm) (8) compared to the longer tails (200 to 250 nm) found in members of the three other S. thermophilus phage groups (5, 6). Of note, phages P738 and D4446 also possess unique twisted tail fibers (length, 48 to 50 nm) composed of 2 or 3 subfibers.
Genome organization and annotation.
We sequenced the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genomes of S. thermophilus phages P738 and D4446 using 454 and Illumina technology, respectively. The genomes are composed of 34,037 bp and 33,656 bp for P738 and D4446, respectively (Table 1). The average G+C content of the genomes was 37.2% for P738 and 37.0% for D4446, similar to other S. thermophilus phages (38.3 ± 1.1%, 100 NCBI genomes) and similar to the host species S. thermophilus (38.6 ± 1.2%). Annotation of these two genomes revealed a modular organization, as is observed with most dsDNA phages. Totals of 48 and 46 open reading frames (ORFs), preceded by a putative ribosome-binding sequence, were identified in phages P738 and D4446, respectively. No gene coding for an integrase was found in these genomes, confirming their lytic lifestyle, and no tRNA gene was detected. Based on BLASTp analysis, functions could be assigned for 21/48 (phage P738) and 18/46 (phage D4446) of the deduced phage proteins (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). We noticed the presence of six ORFans (i.e., ORFs for which no homolog is found in public databases) in phage P738 and four in phage D4446. The four ORFans present in the D4446 genome are also found in P738.
TABLE 1.
P738 |
D4446 |
nt ID (%) | aa ID (%) | Predicted function | S. pyogenes phage T12 BLASTp analysis with P738 (aa ID) (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene no. | Gene length (bp) | No. of aa | Gene no. | Gene length (bp) | No. of aa | ||||
1 | 480 | 159 | 1 | 480 | 159 | 97 | 99 | Terminase small subunit | |
2 | 1,278 | 425 | 2 | 1,278 | 425 | 93 | 99 | Terminase large subunit | 73 |
3 | 1,293 | 430 | 3 | 1,293 | 430 | 93 | 97 | Portal protein | 64 |
4 | 816 | 271 | 4 | 816 | 271 | 94 | 96 | Capsid protein | |
5 | 165 | 54 | 5 | 165 | 54 | 88 | 94 | Hypothetical | |
6 | 588 | 195 | 6 | 588 | 195 | 93 | 95 | Scaffold protein | 45 |
7 | 909 | 302 | 7 | 903 | 300 | 91 | 94 | Capsid protein | 59 |
8 | 153 | 50 | 8 | 153 | 50 | 93 | 94 | Hypothetical | |
9 | 327 | 108 | 9 | 327 | 108 | 91 | 95 | Hypothetical | |
10 | 312 | 103 | 10 | 312 | 103 | 97 | 99 | Hypothetical | |
11 | 351 | 116 | 11 | 351 | 116 | 97 | 97 | Hypothetical | |
12 | 411 | 136 | 12 | 411 | 136 | 96 | 99 | Hypothetical | 63 |
13 | 498 | 165 | 13 | 501 | 166 | 90 | 92 | Major tail protein | 72 |
14 | 315 | 104 | 14 | 315 | 104 | 97 | 98 | Hypothetical | 54 |
15 | 294 | 97 | 15 | 294 | 97 | 96 | 97 | Hypothetical | 57 |
16 | 2,217 | 738 | 16 | 2,217 | 738 | 93 | 98 | Tail tape measure protein | 52 |
17 | 2,322 | 773 | 17 | 2,322 | 773 | 94 | 98 | Distal tail protein | 39 |
18 | 3,972 | 1,323 | 18 | 3,972 | 1,323 | 93 | 97 | N-Acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase | 42 |
19 | 2,001 | 666 | 19 | 2,001 | 666 | 93 | 96 | Structural protein | 40 |
20 | 273 | 90 | 20 | 258 | 85 | 96 | 88 | Hypothetical | |
21 | 351 | 116 | 21 | 351 | 116 | 96 | 97 | Hypothetical | |
22 | 192 | 63 | 22 | 192 | 63 | 96 | 98 | Hypothetical | |
23 | 747 | 248 | 23 | 747 | 248 | 96 | 99 | Peptidoglycan hydrolase | 29 |
24 | 267 | 88 | 24 | 282 | 95 | 90 | 77 | Hypothetical | |
25 | 126 | 41 | 25 | 126 | 41 | 93 | 90 | Hypothetical | |
26 | 228 | 75 | 26 | 228 | 75 | 93 | 99 | XRE family transcriptional regulator | |
27 | 363 | 120 | 27 | 363 | 120 | 83 | 83 | Hypothetical | |
28 | 567 | 188 | DUF1642 domain-containing protein | ||||||
29 | 522 | 173 | DUF1642 domain-containing protein | ||||||
28 | 546 | 181 | Hypothetical | ||||||
30 | 180 | 59 | Hypothetical | ||||||
31 | 147 | 48 | 29 | 147 | 48 | 95 | 91 | Holliday junction resolvase RusA | |
32 | 168 | 55 | Hypothetical | ||||||
30 | 162 | 53 | Hypothetical | ||||||
33 | 342 | 113 | 31 | 342 | 113 | 94 | 97 | Hypothetical | |
34 | 228 | 75 | 32 | 228 | 75 | 93 | 95 | Hypothetical | |
35 | 465 | 154 | 33 | 465 | 154 | 95 | 98 | Hypothetical | |
36 | 1,188 | 395 | 34 | 1,188 | 395 | 91 | 95 | Type III restriction endonuclease subunit | |
37 | 648 | 215 | 35 | 621 | 206 | 94 | 99 | Recombinase | |
38 | 423 | 140 | 36 | 423 | 140 | 80 | 70 | No hit | |
39 | 339 | 112 | 37 | 339 | 112 | 95 | 98 | Hypothetical | |
40 | 825 | 274 | 38 | 825 | 274 | 93 | 98 | Primase | |
41 | 1,350 | 449 | 39 | 1,350 | 449 | 92 | 98 | Helicase | |
42 | 291 | 96 | 40 | 288 | 95 | 85 | 81 | Hypothetical | |
43 | 174 | 57 | 41 | 174 | 57 | 85 | 88 | No hit | |
44 | 444 | 147 | 42 | 453 | 150 | 93 | 93 | Hypothetical | |
45 | 351 | 116 | 43 | 321 | 106 | 95 | 95 | Hypothetical | |
46 | 279 | 92 | 44 | 279 | 92 | 95 | 99 | No hit | |
47 | 339 | 112 | 45 | 339 | 112 | 95 | 98 | No hit | |
48 | 1,170 | 389 | 46 | 1,170 | 389 | 95 | 97 | Hypothetical |
aa, amino acids; nt ID, nucleotide identity; aa ID, amino acid identity.
Comparative genomic analysis.
Genome sequencing revealed that, despite their independent isolation from distinct geographical areas, these new phages are very similar. The P738 and D4446 genomes share 94% nucleotide identity over 96% of their length (Fig. 2). BLASTn analysis of the complete genomic nucleotide sequences revealed that the most closely related phage was Streptococcus pyogenes phage T12 (GenBank accession no. KM289195), with 67% identity across only 15% of the genome (Fig. 2). Thirteen ORFs shared amino acid identity, and 8 of the 13 ORFs shared at least 50% identity with those of phage T12. These ORFs encode a terminase large subunit (ORF2), portal (ORF3), capsid (ORF7), tail protein (ORF13), tail tape measure protein (ORF16), and three hypothetical proteins (ORF12, ORF14, and ORF15). The amino acid identities between the ORFs of phages P738 and T12 are shown in Table 1.
The sequences coding for ORF1 to ORF19 of phages P738 and D4446, which correspond to structural proteins, shared 94% to 99% nucleotide identity. Only two ORFs, ORF17 and ORF18, showed significant similarity between the deduced phage proteins and those found in other S. thermophilus phages, and they are likely involved in host recognition (see below). We observed a higher degree of variation between the rest of the ORFs, namely, ORF20 to ORF48P738/ORF46D4446. The most variable genomic region is located between ORF27 and ORF33 (Fig. 2), where there is more similarity with phages infecting nondairy streptococci than with dairy phages.
Tail proteins and host recognition.
The ORF16 of both phages was annotated as the tail tape measure protein (TMP) based on several observations: (i) the genomic position of orf16, located next to genes coding for phage tail proteins, (ii) its similarity (based on BLASTp analysis) to proteins described as TMP, (iii) the presence of six trans-membrane regions (based on single-molecule real-time [SMART] analysis) (33), often observed in TMPs (34), and (iv) the correlation between tail length and its number of amino acids (35). ORF17 of phage P738 (ORF17P738) shares homology with a putative distal tail protein (Dit) (Tables S1 and S2). It could be aligned with homologs found in other S. thermophilus phage groups, sharing 22.9% amino acid identity with ORF51Sfi11, 22.7% identity with ORF192972, and 18% identity with ORF17DT1 and similar low identity with corresponding ORFs of other phages (Fig. 3). Similarities mostly occur at the N and C termini of the homologs, particularly with ORF19 of phage 2972 (36). ORF192972 is also known as a hybrid structural protein, with a central section conserved between cos and pac phages (36). HHpred analysis revealed that the Dit-encoding genes of P738 and D4446 phages harbor two insertions of carbohydrate-binding domains (CBDs) (Fig. 4A), a feature observed in Lactobacillus phage J-1 (34). One of the CBDs shares structural similarity with the CBD of the evolved Dit of Lactobacillus phage J-1 (37). Evolved Dit has also been observed in S. thermophilus cos group phages (8) and in a large number of Lactococcus lactis phages of the Skunavirus genus (38, 39), with only one insertion. This new configuration of Dit also differs from the one of 5093 and 987 phages (7), which does not contain any CBDs.
ORF18P738, the largest deduced phage protein, shows similarity with two domains involved in peptidoglycan hydrolysis, namely, LYZ2 (lysozyme; E value, 1.2e–13; amino acid positions 264 to 401) and CHAP (cysteine, histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase; E value, 1.1e–9; amino acid positions 456 to 594) (40). These domains are often associated with tail-associated lysins (Tal) (41, 42), which usually follow the Dit-encoding gene, and have been previously observed in other S. thermophilus phages (8). Tal forms a structural trimer with a conical shape, as observed in phage p2 ORF16 (43). In many phages, this structural trimer extends through a fiber-shaped structure harboring hydrolases (phage TP901-1) (39) or antireceptor domains, such as in S. thermophilus DT1 phage VR1 and VR2 domains (36). HHpred analysis of ORF18P738 and ORF18D4446 reveals a striking feature (Fig. 4B); the ORF18 (or Tal) N-terminal structural domain harbors two insertions, with the fold of a hydrolase (CBM1) and a lysin (CBM2). The N terminus is followed by an extension harboring a unique carbohydrate-binding domain (CBM3) with the fold of the BppA domain of phage Tuc2009 (44), followed by a putative cell adhesion domain at the N terminus (CBM4) (Fig. 5).
In addition, the size and function of ORF18 suggest that it forms the straight tail fiber, which paves the way for the TMP to pass through the peptidoglycan layers of the host bacterium. ORF18P738 shows similarities to host-specificity proteins found in other S. thermophilus phages (45). Indeed, we could align ORF18P738 with homologs in phages CHPC929, Sfi11, SW13, Sfi21, and 2972 (Fig. 3), highlighting the presence of VR1 and VR2 regions. HHpred analysis of ORF20 revealed that its C terminus harbors a phage TP901-1 RBP-like domain (see Addendum in Proof).
Proteomic analysis.
We next identified the major components of the viral structure of phage D4446 using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to make the link between the bioinformatic predictions and phage structural proteins. A total of 21 proteins were detected using CsCl purified phages (Table 2). These proteins included the small (ORF1) and large (ORF2) terminase subunits, as well as the phage structural proteins—portal protein (ORF3), capsid proteins (ORF4 and ORF7), tail protein (ORF13), tail tape measure protein (ORF16), distal protein (ORF17), and Tal and tail fiber proteins (ORF18 and ORF19, respectively). The phage endolysin (ORF23), recombinase (ORF35), and helicase (ORF39) were also detected. Analysis also revealed eight phage proteins (ORF9, ORF10, ORF11, ORF12, ORF14, ORF21, ORF34, and ORF46) of unknown function. It is still possible that some of these proteins are not found in the complete virion particles but were inadvertently copurified.
TABLE 2.
ORF | Identified proteins (predicted function) | Theoretical mol wt (kDa) | Exclusive unique peptide count |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Terminase small subunit | 19 | 10 |
2 | Terminase large subunit | 49 | 19 |
3 | Portal protein | 49 | 25 |
4 | Capsid protein | 31 | 18 |
7 | Major capsid protein | 32 | 33 |
9 | ORF9 | 13 | 7 |
10 | ORF10 | 12 | 11 |
11 | ORF11 | 13 | 7 |
12 | ORF12 | 16 | 8 |
13 | Major tail protein | 18 | 3 |
14 | ORF14 | 12 | 2 |
16 | Tail tape measure protein | 77 | 34 |
17 | Distal tail protein | 87 | 36 |
18 | Tail-associated lysin | 148 | 75 |
19 | Fiber protein | 73 | 25 |
21 | ORF21 | 13 | 3 |
23 | Peptidoglycan hydrolase | 27 | 5 |
34 | ORF34 | 46 | 20 |
35 | Recombinase Erf | 23 | 3 |
39 | Helicase | 52 | 3 |
46 | ORF46 | 45 | 21 |
P738 and D4446 belong to a new genus (P738) of streptococcal phages.
As comparative genomic analysis did not reveal additional similarities with other S. thermophilus phages, beside the tail regions implicated in host specificity described above, we sought to better define the taxonomic position of S. thermophilus phages P738 and D4446. We examined proteomes of 100 S. thermophilus phages from the ones available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (Fig. 6). The previously described four groups of S. thermophilus phages were clustered with bootstrap values over 98. We observed a significant separation between the two new phages described in this study and the other S. thermophilus phages, confirming that they belong to a newly emerging phage group infecting this dairy bacterium. We propose to name this new genus after the newly isolated phage P738. This new lineage is supported by a bootstrap value of 97. A higher level of amino acid sequence identity was observed between these newly emerging phages and other streptococcal phages, for example the S. pyogenes prophage T12, which was included to root the phylogenetic tree. This observation suggests that these two novel S. thermophilus phages may have originated, at least partially, from a phage infecting nondairy streptococci.
Host strain features.
We observed differences in plaque size when propagating phages P738 and D4446 on strains S4 and DGCC7891. In addition, the efficiencies of plaquing of both phages were lower on strain S4 when propagated on DGCC7891 but were restored when plaques were recovered and amplified again on strain S4, likely underlying the presence of a host modification system such as restriction-modification (46). Isolation of these two new phages was made possible by using two host strains, and we investigated their relatedness by comparing their CRISPR arrays and those of other S. thermophilus strains, as the S4 and DGCC7891 genomes are not available. We amplified and sequenced the CRISPR arrays of the two active type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems (CR1 and CR3) of both host strains S4 and DGCC7891. We could not amplify by PCR the CR3 locus of strain S4 using our set of primers. The absence of CR3 in some S. thermophilus strains has been noted previously (21).
Then, we compared the composition of the spacers with the other strains (Fig. 7) (47). For consistency in locus comparison, we used the amplicons generated in silico. The CR1 and CR3 arrays of DGCC7891 were identical to those of S. thermophilus ND03 (48). Strains DGCC7891 and ND03 both also clustered with strains APC151 and KLDS3.1012 (Fig. 7A), as their CR1 loci are identical and only a few variations are present in their CR3 loci. Conversely, S. thermophilus S4 appears to be atypical with a short CR1 array composed of six unique spacers (Fig. 7B). Sequences of the spacers in the CRISPR1 of strain S4 are available in Table S3. Best matches revealed that this strain had acquired spacers from three S. thermophilus phage groups but not from 987 phages. Moreover, spacers of the two host strains did not match the P738 or D4446 genomes, suggesting that these phages only started interacting recently with S. thermophilus strains DGCC7891 and S4.
Given the fact that the two virulent phages showed similarity with prophages integrated in the genome of other strains of the Streptococcus genus and that they formed a new taxonomic group, distant from the other S. thermophilus phages, we investigated whether their optimal host could actually be another Streptococcus. We used WIsH (49), a bioinformatic tool that predicts the bacterial host of phages based on genomic sequences, to compare the best host among a set of S. iniae, S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S. parauberis strains, but the analysis did not permit us to robustly predict potential additional hosts for the two newly isolated phages.
In addition, the host range of these new phages was determined using a panel of 154 S. thermophilus strains. This host range revealed 14 additional strains (isolated from the dairy environment) sensitive to both phages. The results with a subset of 30 strains, including the two host strains, 14 new sensitive hosts, and 14 other strains (insensitive) that have been characterized in the literature, are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Strain | Origin/reference | P738 | D4446 |
---|---|---|---|
S4 | Dairy product isolate, Senegal | + (host for propagation) | + |
DGCC7891 | Dairy product isolate, Germany | + | + (host for propagation) |
SC16-1 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC16-2 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC16-4 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC18-6 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC19-0 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC19-1 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC19-7 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC19-9 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC20-1 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC20-4 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC20-5 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
SC24-4 | Starter culture strain | + | + |
MBT-OM1 | Dairy product isolate, Germany | + | + |
MBT-CN1 | Dairy product isolate, Germany | + | + |
LMG18311 | 68 | – | – |
CNRZ1066 | 69 | – | – |
DGCC7854 | 32 | – | – |
DGCC782 | 20 | – | – |
DGCC7796 | 20 | – | – |
LMD-9 | 70 | – | – |
DGCC7710 | 21 | – | – |
SMQ-301 | 71 | – | – |
UY01 | 72 | – | – |
UY02 | 72 | – | – |
UY03 | 72 | – | – |
SMQ-308 | 73 | – | – |
SMQ-312 | 73 | – | – |
SMQ-316 | 73 | – | – |
+, clear lysis; –, absence of lysis.
DISCUSSION
Here, we show that the virulent phages P738 and D4446 are novel among S. thermophilus phages, with little relatedness to other known phages infecting strains of this species. The high sequence similarity between these two phages prompts us to define a fifth group of S. thermophilus phages. The prophage T12 of S. pyogenes appeared to be related to these two new S. thermophilus phages, suggesting a common ancestor. This putative host shift has also been mentioned after isolation of 5093-like phages, which appeared to have originated from extensive interspecies horizontal gene transfer events and intraspecies genetic recombination events with phages that infect both dairy and nondairy streptococci (6).
These newly isolated phages share host recognition proteins with other S. thermophilus phages, likely relevant to the capacity of infection of strains of the species. Genetic mutations during viral replication can also generate viral variants that acquire the ability to infect new hosts (50). It has been demonstrated that the abundance of potential hosts favors shifts in viral infectivity (51). In the murine gut ecosystem, which offers access to new hosts, the microbiota shifts the genetic diversity of phages, thereby promoting long-term persistence of phage populations.
Diverse species are described among the genus Streptococcus, and most of them are commensal or pathogenic in humans and animals (52). S. thermophilus is the only species of this genus to be widely used as a starter culture in the dairy industry and to have the “generally recognized as safe” status. It has colonized the milk niche, but its environmental reservoir has not been identified (53). Despite gene loss and adaptation to its niche, S. thermophilus is capable of establishing biofilms, vestiges of a commensal lifestyle (54), where horizontal and vertical phage evolution may have happened in an ancestor that probably infected other species. Interestingly, the genomes of P738 and D4446 did not match any spacer from the CRISPRFinder database (55), nor the metagenome spacer database (56), supporting the hypothesis of a very recent emergence.
It was previously reported that evolution among S. thermophilus phages is driven by modular exchanges (7–9, 13, 14), but limited shared gene modules with other S. thermophilus phages were revealed in the comparative genomic analysis of phages P738 and D4446. Such module exchange events can occur during phage coinfection or infection of a lysogenic strain (which are rare within the S. thermophilus species) or possibly after internalization of extracellular DNA through natural competence, and the newly described phages may not have recombined extensively yet with other S. thermophilus phages to adapt to their new host.
Our study also highlights the expanding genomic diversity of S. thermophilus phages as well as the importance of phage monitoring to minimize the phage risk in milk fermentation processes and to adapt control strategies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Phages, bacteria, and growth conditions and purification.
S. thermophilus DGCC7891 and S4 were cultivated in M17 medium (Oxoid) supplemented with 0.5% (wt/vol) lactose and 10 mM CaCl2 for phage amplification. Cultures were incubated at 37°C without shaking to generate an overnight culture for use the following day. In all other cases, cultures were incubated at 42°C. For phage amplification, the appropriate host strain was inoculated with a scraping from a phage lysate preserved at –80°C with 15% (vol/vol) glycerol and grown until complete lysis was observed. The lysate containing phage D4446 was then filtered through a 0.45-μm polyethersulfone (PES) filter, and 100 μl was used to inoculate a bacterial culture grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1. The resulting culture was grown until complete lysis was observed, and this second phage amplification lysate was also filtered through a 0.45-μm PES filter and stored at 4°C. To obtain high-titer phage D4446 lysate, 1 liter of phage lysate was concentrated with 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 and 0.5 M NaCl (Laboratoire Mat) and purified on a discontinuous CsCl (Fisher Scientific) gradient followed by a continuous CsCl gradient as described previously (57). Purified phages were recovered by ultracentrifugation using a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor at 35,000 rpm (210,053 × g) for 3 h, followed by a second ultracentrifugation using a Beckman NVT65 rotor at 60,000 rpm (342,317 × g) for 18 h. The phage preparation was then dialyzed against phage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4). The lysate containing phage P738 was incubated with 3 μl/ml each of DNase I and RNase at 37°C for 1 h. NaCl was added to a final concentration of 1 M, dissolved by swirling, and kept on ice for 1 h. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation in a JA10 rotor (Beckman, USA) at 7,000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was recovered and PEG 6000 was added to a final concentration of 10% (wt/vol). After at least 1 h on ice, precipitated phage particles were recovered by centrifugation in a JA10 rotor (8,000 rpm, 4°C, 10 min). Phage particles were purified on a discontinuous CsCl gradient (57) and recovered by centrifugation in a Beckman SW32.1 Ti rotor (Beckman, USA) at 10°C and 25,000 rpm for 20 h. The phage preparation was then dialyzed against buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4).
DNA extraction, genome sequencing, and annotation.
Phage D4446 genomic DNA was extracted from lysate (∼109 plaque-forming units [PFU]/ml) using the Qiagen plasmid maxi kit (Qiagen, USA) with previously described modifications of the former Maxi lambda DNA purification kit (58). Sequencing libraries were prepared with the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced using a MiSeq reagent kit V2 (Illumina, 500 cycles) on a MiSeq system using paired ends (2 × 250 bp). Phage P738 genomic DNA was isolated from CsCl-purified phages according to a standard protocol, including phenol and chloroform/isoamyl alcohol purification steps (26). Sequencing was done by AGOWA (now LGC Genomics, Berlin, Germany) using 454 sequencing with an average 20-fold coverage.
De novo assembly was performed with Ray assembler version 3.0.0 (59). Nucleotide coverage was calculated with SAMtools (60). The sequences were analyzed using Geneious software version 11.0.5. Open reading frames were identified with GeneMark.hmm (61). A sequence was considered an ORF only if its starting codon was AUG, UUG, or GUG and it possessed at least 30 amino acids. Ribosomal binding sites (RBS) similar to the standard Shine-Dalgarno sequence were also identified. The BLASTp database was used to predict the function of each ORF (50). Theoretical molecular masses (MM) and isoelectric points (pI) of the phage proteins were obtained using ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). ARAGORN (62) and tRNAscan-SE version 1.21 (63) were used to search for tRNA genes. The nucleotide number 1 was set upstream of the beginning of the gene coding for the terminase small subunit.
Electron microscopy.
Phage lysates, purified on a cesium chloride gradient, were dialyzed against buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.2], 10 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgSO4). Negative staining with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate, transmission electron microscopy (Tecnai 10; FEI Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV, and imaging with a MegaView G2 CCD camera (Emsis, Münster, Germany) were done as described before for S. thermophilus phages (8, 9).
Comparative genomic analysis.
All predicted ORFs from P738 were compared to ORFs of D4446 and S. pyogenes prophage T12 using Easyfig (64). The complete genome sequences of 100 S. thermophilus phages available in the GenBank database were also analyzed. S. pyogenes phage T12 was used to analyze the phylogenetic position of phages P738 and D4446. All nucleotide sequence pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) method (65) with the Virus Classification and Tree Building Online Resource (VICTOR) under settings recommended for prokaryotic viruses (66). The resulting intergenomic distances were used to infer a balanced minimum evolution tree with branch support via FastME (67). Branch support was inferred from 100 pseudobootstrap replicates each.
Analyses of phage D4446 structural proteins.
Phage structural proteins were detected directly from the purified phage preparations after in-solution tryptic digestion by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at the Plateforme Protéomique, Centre de Génomique de Québec (Université Laval). A custom database was generated using the putative predicted proteins from the sequences of the phage genomes and compared with the peptides identified. These results were analyzed with Scaffold Proteome Software version 4.4.5.
S. thermophilus CRISPR loci analysis.
CRISPR loci CR1 and CR3 were amplified by PCR (Feldan Taq DNA polymerase) and then Sanger-sequenced. CRISPR1/CR1 analysis was performed with the primers yc70 (5′-TGCTGAGACAACCTAGTCTCTC-3′) and CR1-rev (5′-TAAACAGAGCCTCCCTATCC-3′), whereas primers CR3-fwd (5′-CTGAGATTAATAGTGCGATTACG-3′) and CR3-rev (5′-GCTGGATATTCGTATAACATGTC-3′) were used for the amplification of CRISPR3/CR3 (23). Spacer analyses were performed with Geneious version 11.0.5. CRISPRStudio (47) was used for CRISPR array visualization.
Host prediction using bioinformatics analysis.
WIsH version 1.0 was used for the prediction of bacterial hosts of the phages. Instructions on the github page of the software were followed (https://github.com/soedinglab/WIsH) (49). A total of 28 S. pyogenes strains carrying the T12 prophage, 32 S. pyogenes strains not carrying the T12 prophage, and 32 S. thermophilus strains were selected to predict the best host among them. The null model consisted of 25 coliphages known not to infect any of the streptococcal species. All the strains and phage genomes used for the prediction and null model are listed in the supplemental materials.
Data availability.
The complete genome sequences of phages P738 and D4446 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MK911750 and MN938931, respectively.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Amanda Toperoff and Michi Waygood for editorial assistance and Angela Back and Inka Lammertz (Max Rubner-Institut, Kiel) for technical assistance with the electron microscopy and host range analysis. We also thank Isabelle Chavichvily for technical assistance with phage isolation and Geneviève Rousseau for discussion.
S.M. acknowledges funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Program. S.M. holds a tier 1 Canada Research Chair in bacteriophages.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
A manuscript revisiting the adhesion devices of phages from Streptococcus thermophilus is in press (74).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wommack KE, Colwell RR. 2000. Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:69–114. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.64.1.69-114.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McGrath S, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. 2007. Bacteriophages in dairy products: pros and cons. Biotechnol J 2:450–455. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quiberoni A, Moineau S, Rousseau GM, Reinheimer J, Ackermann HW. 2010. Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages. Int Dairy J 20:657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mahony J, van Sinderen D. 2014. Current taxonomy of phages infecting lactic acid bacteria. Front Microbiol 5:7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Le Marrec C, van Sinderen D, Walsh L, Stanley E, Vlegels E, Moineau S, Heinze P, Fitzgerald G, Fayard B. 1997. Two groups of bacteriophages infecting Streptococcus thermophilus can be distinguished on the basis of mode of packaging and genetic determinants for major structural proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3246–3253. doi: 10.1128/AEM.63.8.3246-3253.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mills S, Griffin C, O’Sullivan O, Coffey A, McAuliffe O, Meijer WC, Serrano LM, Ross RP. 2011. A new phage on the “mozzarella” block: bacteriophage 5093 shares a low level of homology with other Streptococcus thermophilus phages. Int Dairy J 21:963–969. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McDonnell B, Mahony J, Neve H, Hanemaaijer L, Noben J-P, Kouwen T, van Sinderen D. 2016. Identification and analysis of a novel group of bacteriophages infecting the lactic acid bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5153–5165. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00835-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lavelle K, Murphy J, Fitzgerald B, Lugli GA, Zomer A, Neve H, Ventura M, Franz CM, Cambillau C, van Sinderen D, Mahony J. 2018. A decade of Streptococcus thermophilus phage evolution in an Irish dairy plant. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02855-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02855-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lavelle K, Martinez I, Neve H, Lugli GA, Franz CMAP, Ventura M, Dal Bello F, van Sinderen D, Mahony J. 2018. Biodiversity of Streptococcus thermophilus phages in global dairy fermentations. Viruses 10:577. doi: 10.3390/v10100577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lucchini S, Desiere F, Brüssow H. 1999. Comparative genomics of Streptococcus thermophilus phage species supports a modular evolution theory. J Virol 73:8647–8656. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8647-8656.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Neve H, Zenz KI, Desiere F, Koch A, Heller KJ, Brüssow H. 1998. Comparison of the lysogeny modules from the temperate Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages TP-J34 and Sfi21: implications for the modular theory of phage evolution. Virology 241:61–72. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brüssow H, Canchaya C, Hardt W-D. 2004. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:560–602. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.560-602.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brüssow H, Desiere F. 2001. Comparative phage genomics and the evolution of Siphoviridae: insights from dairy phages. Mol Microbiol 39:213–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Szymczak P, Janzen T, Neves AR, Kot W, Hansen LH, Lametsch R, Neve H, Franz CMAP, Vogensen FK. 2017. Novel variants of Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages are indicative of genetic recombination among phages from different bacterial species. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02748-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02748-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mahony J, van Sinderen D. 2012. Structural aspects of the interaction of dairy phages with their host bacteria. Viruses 4:1410–1424. doi: 10.3390/v4091410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mahony J, Cambillau C, van Sinderen D. 2017. Host recognition by lactic acid bacterial phages. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S16–S26. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Melo AG, Levesque S, Moineau S. 2018. Phages as friends and enemies in food processing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 49:185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hynes AP, Lemay ML, Trudel L, Deveau H, Frenette M, Tremblay DM, Moineau S. 2017. Detecting natural adaptation of the Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR-Cas systems in research and classroom settings. Nat Protoc 12:547–565. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Szymczak P, Filipe SR, Covas G, Vogensen FK, Neves AR, Janzen T. 2018. Cell wall glycans mediate recognition of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus by bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01847-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01847-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Labrie SJ, Mosterd C, Loignon S, Dupuis M-È, Desjardins P, Rousseau GM, Tremblay DM, Romero DA, Horvath P, Fremaux C, Moineau S. 2019. A mutation in the methionine aminopeptidase gene provides phage resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. Sci Rep 9:13816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49975-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P. 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709–1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Garneau JE, Dupuis M-È, Villion M, Romero D, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S. 2010. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468:67–71. doi: 10.1038/nature09523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Horvath P, Romero DA, Coûté-Monvoisin AC, Richards M, Deveau H, Moineau S, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Barrangou R. 2008. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190:1401–1412. doi: 10.1128/JB.01415-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mills S, Griffin C, Coffey A, Meijer WC, Hafkamp B, Ross RP. 2010. CRISPR analysis of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants (BIMs) of industrial Streptococcus thermophilus: implications for starter design. J Appl Microbiol 108:945–955. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lucchini S, Sidoti J, Brüssow H. 2000. Broad-range bacteriophage resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus by insertional mutagenesis. Virology 275:267–277. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ali Y, Koberg S, Heßner S, Sun X, Rabe B, Back A, Neve H, Heller KJ. 2014. Temperate Streptococcus thermophilus phages expressing superinfection exclusion proteins of the Ltp type. Front Microbiol 5:98. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.da Silva Duarte V, Giaretta S, Campanaro S, Treu L, Armani A, Tarrah A, Oliveira de Paula S, Giacomini A, Corich V. 2018. A cryptic non-inducible prophage confers phage-immunity on the Streptococcus thermophilus M17PTZA496. Viruses 11:7. doi: 10.3390/v11010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. 2010. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:317–327. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paez-Espino D, Sharon I, Morovic W, Stahl B, Thomas BC, Barrangou R, Banfield JF. 2015. CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. mBio 6:e00262-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00262-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, Labonté J, Fremaux C, Boyaval P, Romero DA, Horvath P, Moineau S. 2008. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190:1390–1400. doi: 10.1128/JB.01412-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hynes AP, Rousseau GM, Lemay M-L, Horvath P, Romero DA, Fremaux C, Moineau S. 2017. An anti-CRISPR from a virulent streptococcal phage inhibits Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9. Nat Microbiol 2:1374–1380. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hynes AP, Rousseau GM, Agudelo D, Goulet A, Amigues B, Loehr J, Romero DA, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Doyon Y, Cambillau C, Moineau S. 2018. Widespread anti-CRISPR proteins in virulent bacteriophages inhibit a range of Cas9 proteins. Nat Commun 9:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05092-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Letunic I, Bork P. 2018. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D493–D496. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bebeacua C, Tremblay D, Farenc C, Chapot-Chartier M-P, Sadovskaya I, van Heel M, Veesler D, Moineau S, Cambillau C. 2013. Structure, adsorption to host, and infection mechanism of virulent lactococcal phage p2. J Virol 87:12302–12312. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02033-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mahony J, Alqarni M, Stockdale S, Spinelli S, Feyereisen M, Cambillau C, van Sinderen D. 2016. Functional and structural dissection of the tape measure protein of lactococcal phage TP901-1. Sci Rep 6:36667. doi: 10.1038/srep36667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lévesque C, Duplessis M, Labonté J, Labrie S, Fremaux C, Tremblay D, Moineau S. 2005. Genomic organization and molecular analysis of virulent bacteriophage 2972 infecting an exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4057–4068. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4057-4068.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dieterle M-E, Spinelli S, Sadovskaya I, Piuri M, Cambillau C. 2017. Evolved distal tail carbohydrate binding modules of Lactobacillus phage J-1: a novel type of anti-receptor widespread among lactic acid bacteria phages. Mol Microbiol 104:608–620. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hayes S, Mahony J, Vincentelli R, Ramond L, Nauta A, van Sinderen D, Cambillau C. 2019. Ubiquitous carbohydrate binding modules decorate 936 lactococcal siphophage virions. Viruses 11:631. doi: 10.3390/v11070631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hayes S, Vincentelli R, Mahony J, Nauta A, Ramond L, Lugli GA, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Cambillau C. 2018. Functional carbohydrate binding modules identified in evolved dits from siphophages infecting various Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 110:777–795. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Duplessis M, Lévesque CM, Moineau S. 2006. Characterization of Streptococcus thermophilus host range phage mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3036–3041. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.3036-3041.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kenny JG, McGrath S, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. 2004. Bacteriophage Tuc2009 encodes a tail-associated cell wall-degrading activity. J Bacteriol 186:3480–3491. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3480-3491.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stockdale SR, Mahony J, Courtin P, Chapot-Chartier MP, Van Pijkeren JP, Britton RA, Neve H, Heller KJ, Aideh B, Vogensen FK, van Sinderen D. 2013. The lactococcal phages Tuc2009 and TP901-1 incorporate two alternate forms of their tail fiber into their virions for infection specialization. J Biol Chem 288:5581–5590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.444901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sciara G, Bebeacua C, Bron P, Tremblay D, Ortiz-Lombardia M, Lichière J, van Heel M, Campanacci V, Moineau S, Cambillau C. 2010. Structure of lactococcal phage p2 baseplate and its mechanism of activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6852–6857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000232107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Legrand P, Collins B, Blangy S, Murphy J, Spinelli S, Gutierrez C, Richet N, Kellenberger C, Desmyter A, Mahony J, van Sinderen D, Cambillau C. 2016. The atomic structure of the phage Tuc2009 baseplate tripod suggests that host recognition involves two different carbohydrate binding modules. mBio 7:e01781-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01781-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Szymczak P, Rau MH, Monteiro JM, Pinho MG, Filipe SR, Vogensen FK, Zeidan AA, Janzen T. 2019. A comparative genomics approach for identifying host-range determinants in Streptococcus thermophilus bacteriophages. Sci Rep 9:7991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44481-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Magadán AH, Moineau S. 2013. CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance. Nat Commun 4:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dion MB, Labrie SJ, Shah SA, Moineau S. 2018. CRISPRStudio: a user-friendly software for rapid CRISPR array visualization. Viruses 10:602–611. doi: 10.3390/v10110602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sun Z, Chen X, Wang J, Zhao W, Shao Y, Wu L, Zhou Z, Sun T, Wang L, Meng H, Zhang H, Chen W. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus thermophilus strain ND03. J Bacteriol 193:793–794. doi: 10.1128/JB.01374-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Galiez C, Siebert M, Enault F, Vincent J, Söding J. 2017. Sequence analysis WIsH: who is the hosts? Predicting prokaryotic hosts from metagenomic phage contigs. Bioinformatics 33:3113–3114. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Poirier EZ, Vignuzzi M. 2017. Virus population dynamics during infection. Curr Opin Virol 23:82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.De Sordi L, Khanna V, Debarbieux L. 2017. The gut microbiota facilitates drifts in the genetic diversity and infectivity of bacterial viruses. Cell Host Microbe 22:801–808.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Facklam R. 2002. What happened to the Streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:613–630.54. doi: 10.1128/cmr.15.4.613-630.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Delorme C, Abraham AL, Renault P, Guédon E. 2015. Genomics of Streptococcus salivarius, a major human commensal. Infect Genet Evol 33:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Couvigny B, Thérial C, Gautier C, Renault P, Briandet R, Guédon E. 2015. Streptococcus thermophilus biofilm formation: a remnant trait of ancestral commensal life? PLoS One 10:e0128099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 35:52–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen I-M, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Varghese N, White JR, Seshadri R, Smirnova T, Kirton E, Jungbluth SP, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2018. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:666–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sambrook JF, Russell DW (ed). 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed, vol 1–3 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Deveau H, van Calsteren MR, Moineau S. 2002. Effect of exopolysaccharides on phage-host interactions in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4364–4369. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.9.4364-4369.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Boisvert S, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2010. Ray: simultaneous assembly of reads from a mix of high-throughput sequencing technologies. J Comput Biol 17:1519–1533. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. TRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2017. VICTOR: genome-based phylogeny and classification of prokaryotic viruses. Bioinformatics 33:3396–3404. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. 2015. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 32:2798–2800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Henry R, Bruneau E, Gardan R, Bertin S, Fleuchot B, Decaris B, Leblond-Bourget N. 2011. The rgg0182 gene encodes a transcriptional regulator required for the full Streptococcus thermophilus LMG18311 thermal adaptation. BMC Microbiol 11:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Renault P, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD, Kulakauskas S, Lapidus A, Goltsman E, Mazur M, Pusch GD, Fonstein M, Overbeek R, Kyprides N, Purnelle B, Prozzi D, Ngui K, Masuy D, Hancy F, Burteau S, Boutry M, Delcour J, Goffeau A, Hols P. 2004. Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat Biotechnol 22:1554–1558. doi: 10.1038/nbt1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee J-H, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D. 2006. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15611–15616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607117103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Labrie SJ, Tremblay DM, Plante PL, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, Corbeil J, Moineau S. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus thermophilus SMQ-301, a model strain for phage-host interactions. Genome Announc 3:e00480-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00480-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Achigar R, Magadán AH, Tremblay DM, Julia Pianzzola M, Moineau S. 2017. Phage-host interactions in Streptococcus thermophilus: genome analysis of phages isolated in Uruguay and ectopic spacer acquisition in CRISPR array. Sci Rep 7:43438. doi: 10.1038/srep43438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Turgeon N, Moineau S. 2001. Isolation and characterization of a Streptococcus thermophilus plasmid closely related to the pMV158 family. Plasmid 45:171–183. doi: 10.1006/plas.2001.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lavelle K, Goulet A, McDonnel B, Spinelli S, van Sinderen D, Mahony J, Cambillau C. Revisiting the host adhesion determinants of Streptococcus thermophilus siphophages. Microb Biotechnol, in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome sequences of phages P738 and D4446 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MK911750 and MN938931, respectively.