Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Jun 18;9(25):e00475-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00475-20

Complete Genome Sequence and Annotation for Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T (DSM 14220)

Joel J Maki a,b,c, Daniel W Nielsen a,c, Torey Looft a,
Editor: Frank J Stewartd
PMCID: PMC7303409  PMID: 32554789

Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361 (DSM 14220) is the reference and type strain for the Turicibacter genus, commonly found in the intestinal tract of animal species. Long-read sequencing was performed on this strain to complement publicly available Illumina HiSeq-based data, producing a complete annotated genome sequence.

ABSTRACT

Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361 (DSM 14220) is the reference and type strain for the Turicibacter genus, commonly found in the intestinal tract of animal species. Long-read sequencing was performed on this strain to complement publicly available Illumina HiSeq-based data, producing a complete annotated genome sequence.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Turicibacter is a genus of the Firmicutes phylum, commonly identified in the intestine of animals (18). Turicibacter species are capable of interaction with host-derived compounds, suggesting that they contribute to physiological processes (913). Here, we describe the complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T.

Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361 is the type strain for the type species of Turicibacter and was sequenced in 2019 as part of the Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute project Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacterial and Archaeal Type Strains, Phase IV: the One Thousand Microbial Genomes (KMG IV). The incomplete draft genome was uploaded to NCBI (assembly accession number GCA_004338625.1). To complete the T. sanguinis genome, long-read sequence data were generated for assembly with existing short-read data. T. sanguinis DSM 14220 was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) and grown anaerobically at 37°C on brain heart infusion (BHI) broth prior to sequencing. Genomic DNA was isolated using the PureLink genomic DNA extraction minikit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was assessed using gel electrophoresis, a Qubit fluorimeter (double-stranded DNA [dsDNA] broad-range [BR] kit; Life Technologies, Waltham, MA), and a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) prior to sequencing. The genomic library for Nanopore sequencing was prepared with the SQK-RBK004 rapid barcoding kit (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted. A FLO-MIN106 (R9.4.1) flow cell was used on a MinION device (Oxford Nanopore) for sequencing of the T. sanguinis MOL361T genomic DNA. The flow cell was run for 48 h, and reads were quality (Q) scored (Q ≥ 7), demultiplexed, and trimmed with Guppy v3.1.5 (14). A total of 66,759 MinION reads (genomic coverage, 30×) with a mean length of 2,632 bp (N50, 4,949 bp) were generated. Paired-end Illumina HiSeq reads (2 × 150 bp; genomic coverage, 240×) were downloaded from GenBank’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number PRJNA500327) using the SRA Toolkit (15). Illumina and Nanopore reads were assembled into 2 contigs with Unicycler v0.4.7 in “bold” mode (16). Geneious Prime v2019.1.1 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) was used to map the Illumina HiSeq and MinION reads to both contigs using the “map to reference” command with “medium sensitivity” settings. The smaller (1,400-bp) contig was present in the Illumina reads but not in the Nanopore reads. A BLASTn search of the NCBI nucleotide database identified the small contig as similar (>97% identity) to DNA sequences originating from several ungulates, a Clostridium botulinum genome, an Actinoalloteichus sp. genome, and a Babesia bigemina genome. This observation, and the Geneious mapping, suggested that this second contig was a contaminant, and it was removed from the final assembly.

The remaining circular contig was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v4.11 (17). The annotated chromosome for Turicibacter sanguinis MOL36T was 2,999,687 bp long with 34.4% G+C content. Turicibacter sanguinis MOL36T has 2,752 protein-coding sequences, with 43 pseudogenes and 121 tRNA genes.

Data availability.

This genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP053187. The Nanopore reads are available in the NCBI SRA under accession number SRR11185522.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

MinION sequencing was performed at the NADC in Ames, Iowa. We thank Markus Göker (DSMZ) for permitting the use of his Illumina sequencing reads and Stefan Spring (DSMZ) for curating T. sanguinis MOL361T. We thank David Alt (USDA) for sequencing support.

This research was supported by USDA Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) funds. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. 2002. Turicibacter sanguinis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1263–1266. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Verbarg S, Göker M, Scheuner C, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. 2014. The families Erysipelotrichaceae emend., Coprobacillaceae fam. nov., and Turicibacteraceae fam. nov, p 79–105. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (ed), The prokaryotes: Firmicutes and Tenericutes. Springer, Berlin, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30120-9_205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cuív PÓ, Klaassens ES, Durkin AS, Harkins DM, Foster L, McCorrison J, Torralba M, Nelson KE, Morrison M. 2011. Draft genome sequence of Turicibacter sanguinis PC909, isolated from human feces. J Bacteriol 193:1288–1289. doi: 10.1128/JB.01328-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Köhler T, Dietrich C, Scheffrahn RH, Brune A. 2012. High-resolution analysis of gut environment and bacterial microbiota reveals functional compartmentation of the gut in wood-feeding higher termites (Nasutitermes spp.). Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4691–4701. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00683-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Looft T, Allen HK, Cantarel BL, Levine UY, Bayles DO, Alt DP, Henrissat B, Stanton TB. 2014. Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations. ISME J 8:1566–1576. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Auchtung TA, Holder ME, Gesell JR, Ajami NJ, Duarte RTD, Itoh K, Caspi RR, Petrosino JF, Horai R, Zárate-Bladés CR. 2016. Complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, isolated from the feces of a contaminated germ-free mouse. Genome Announc 4:e00114-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00114-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar S, Chen C, Indugu N, Werlang GO, Singh M, Kim WK, Thippareddi H. 2018. Effect of antibiotic withdrawal in feed on chicken gut microbial dynamics, immunity, growth performance and prevalence of foodborne pathogens. PLoS One 13:e0192450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson TA, Sylte MJ, Looft T. 2019. In-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate modulates the turkey microbiota and metabolome in a dose-dependent manner. Sci Rep 9:8212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44338-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goodrich JK, Davenport ER, Beaumont M, Jackson MA, Knight R, Ober C, Spector TD, Bell JT, Clark AG, Ley RE. 2016. Genetic determinants of the gut microbiome in UK twins. Cell Host Microbe 19:731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.BenSassi N, Vas J, Vasdal G, Averos X, Estevez I, Newberry RC. 2019. On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes. PLoS One 14:e0214070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fung TC, Vuong HE, Luna CDG, Pronovost GN, Aleksandrova AA, Riley NG, Vavilina A, McGinn J, Rendon T, Forrest LR, Hsiao EY. 2019. Intestinal serotonin and fluoxetine exposure modulate bacterial colonization in the gut. Nat Microbiol 4:2064–2073. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0540-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kemis JH, Linke V, Barrett KL, Boehm FJ, Traeger LL, Keller MP, Rabaglia ME, Schueler KL, Stapleton DS, Gatti DM, Churchill GA, Amador-Noguez D, Russell JD, Yandell BS, Broman KW, Coon JJ, Attie AD, Rey FE. 2019. Genetic determinants of gut microbiota composition and bile acid profiles in mice. PLoS Genet 15:e1008073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gao H, Jiang Q, Ji H, Ning J, Li C, Zheng H. 2019. Type 1 diabetes induces cognitive dysfunction in rats associated with alterations of the gut microbiome and metabolomes in serum and hippocampus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1865:165541. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.165541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. 2019. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 20:129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M, International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration . 2011. The Sequence Read Archive. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D19–D21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP053187. The Nanopore reads are available in the NCBI SRA under accession number SRR11185522.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES