Abstract
We describe a case of eosinophilic temporal arteritis in a 61-year-old woman with hypereosinophilic syndrome, who developed subcutaneous nodules in the temporal areas and digital cyanosis with small nodules on the sides of her fingers. Ultrasound revealed occlusion and corkscrew-like changes of the temporal and digital arteries, respectively. Temporal artery biopsy revealed eosinophilic vasculitis without giant cell formation. Angiography showed occlusion of the ulnar and digital arteries. Administration of low-dose corticosteroid improved the temporal artery swelling and digital cyanosis. More reports of similar cases are required to characterize this type of non-giant cell eosinophilic vasculitis that affects the peripheral arteries.
Keywords: eosinophilic temporal arteritis, digital ischemia, eosinophilia
Introduction
Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a rare systemic disorder of unknown etiology characterized by persistent eosinophilia in blood (absolute eosinophil count >1,500 /μL), which cannot be attributed to secondary causes of eosinophilia, as well as end-organ damage mediated by eosinophils, such as eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, eosinophilic dermatitis, eosinophilic pneumonia, and eosinophilic myocarditis (1). In rare cases, HES can also involve the vascular systems, leading to eosinophilic vasculitis that affects not only the small vessels (e.g., cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis) but also the medium-sized vessels of the limbs (2-11).
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is large vessel vasculitis in the elderly (usually >50 years of age), which is pathologically characterized by mononuclear infiltration of the arterial wall and granuloma formation with multinucleated giant cells (12). Since GCA mostly occurs in the temporal arteries, it is also known as temporal arteritis. However, not all cases of “temporal arteritis” are GCA. Genereau et al. demonstrated that non-giant cell vasculitis, such as polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), microscopic polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, and rheumatoid vasculitis were identified in 4.5% of positive (inflamed) temporal artery biopsy specimens (13). Temporal artery involvement was also reported - albeit less frequently - in patients with juvenile temporal arteritis (JTA) (14), thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO, Buerger's disease) (15-19), HES (10), and other secondary vasculitis (20-28).
In this report, we describe a rare case of hypereosinophilia in an elderly woman who had corticosteroid-responsive temporal region swelling and digital ischemia due to non-granulomatous eosinophilic vasculitis. The simultaneous occurrence of eosinophilic temporal arteritis and digital ischemia is rare. One similar case has been reported in the literature by Ito et al. (10) and Motegi et al. (29), who considered that eosinophilic peripheral arteritis could be a new disease entity related to HES. Based on the case presentation and a review of the relevant literature, we discuss the possible differential diagnosis of peripheral eosinophilic arteritis.
Case Report
A 60-year-old Japanese woman was brought to our hospital in July with a one-month history of subcutaneous nodules in her temporal areas that were slightly pruritic and tender (Fig. 1). She had no other symptoms of note, in particular no systemic symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight loss), visual impairment, or musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of polymyalgia rheumatica, such as stiffness and pain in the neck, shoulder and hip areas. She was a smoker with a 20-30 pack-year smoking history. She had no history of dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or allergic diseases, including respiratory symptoms suggestive of bronchial asthma. She had a family history of neurofibromatosis, and her son had Café-au-lait lesions. Besides temporal artery enlargement, she reported having consistently noticed several subcutaneous nodules on her head.
Figure 1.
Subcutaneous nodules in the temporal areas that were slightly pruritic and tender and considered to be swelling of the superficial temporal artery with reduced pulsation. A: The right temporal area. B: The left temporal area.
A general physical examination revealed that her height was 148 cm, and her weight was 37 kg. Her body temperature was 35.7℃, her pulse rate was 61 beats per minute, and her blood pressure 131/71 mmHg. Her palpebral conjunctiva was not anemic, and her bulbar conjunctiva was not icteric. Cardiopulmonary and abdominal examinations revealed no abnormalities. No peripheral edema was noted. The subcutaneous nodule in her right temporal area, was considered to be the swelling of the superficial temporal artery with reduced pulsation, which was confirmed by ultrasound (US) imaging showing hypoechogenic wall thickening and luminal stenosis of the temporal artery (Fig. 2A). A complete blood count revealed a white blood cell count of 10,300 with 5.4% eosinophils (556 /μL) (Table). Her erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), complement 3 (C3), complement 4 (C4), immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin E, fibrin degradation product (FDP), and D-dimer levels were within the normal ranges. A microscopic stool examination was negative for ova and parasites. Her antinuclear antibody (Ab) titer was 1:40 (normal value, <1:40). Additionally, tests for rheumatoid factor, anti-phospholipid Abs, anti-deoxyribonucleic acid Abs, anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) Abs, and anti-proteinase-3 Abs were negative. The patient's serum was negative for hepatitis B and C including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV). Ischemic lesions suggestive of GCA, such as arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy and central retinal artery occlusion (30), were absent on an ophthalmological examination. Since her ESR and CRP levels were not elevated, the patient was followed-up without medication.
Figure 2.
Color-duplex ultrasound images of the affected vessels. A: Hypoechogenic wall thickening and luminal stenosis of the right temporal artery. B: The corkscrew architecture of the digital artery of the affected finger.
Table.
The Laboratory Values on Admission for the Patient with Eosinophilic Arteritis.
| Laboratory tests | Results | Reference range | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBC | |||
| WBC count | 8,300 | 2,700-8,800 | /μL |
| Eosinophil (%) | 15.0 | 0-7 | % |
| RBC count | 458 | 370-540 | ×104/μL |
| Hemoglobin | 14.5 | 11.0-17.0 | g/dL |
| Hematocrit | 42.2 | 34.0-49.0 | % |
| Platelets | 27.5 | 14-34 | ×104/μL |
| Coagulation-fibrinolysis | |||
| PT-INR | 0.94 | 0.85-1.15 | |
| APTT | 35.5 | 30.0+5.0 | s |
| Fibrinogen | 324 | 200-400 | mg/dL |
| D-dimer | 0.15 | <0.8 | μg/mL |
| FDP | 14 | <2.8 | μg/mL |
| Biochemistry | |||
| Total protein | 6.9 | 6.6-8.2 | g/dL |
| Albumin | 4.4 | 3.9-4.9 | g/dL |
| AST | 19 | 8-38 | U/L |
| ALT | 26 | 4-44 | U/L |
| LDH | 153 | 106-211 | U/L |
| γ-GTP | 28 | 17-73 | U/L |
| Alkaline phosphatase | 209 | 104-338 | U/L |
| Total bilirubin | 0.45 | 0.2-1.2 | mg/dL |
| BUN | 8.1 | 8.0-22.6 | mg/dL |
| Serum creatinine | 0.54 | 0.4-0.8 | mg/dL |
| CK | 69 | 43-165 | U/L |
| ESR | 12.0 | <15 | mm per hour |
| CRP | <0.3 | <0.3 | mg/dL |
| Urinalysis | |||
| Proteinuria | (-) | (-) | |
| WBC | <1/HPF | <1-4/HPF | |
| RBC | <1/HPF | <1-4/HPF | |
| Casts | (-) | (-) | |
| Immunological | |||
| IgG | 1,041 | 870-1,700 | mg/dL |
| IgA | 127 | 110-410 | mg/dL |
| IgM | 169 | 35-220 | mg/dL |
| IgE | 82.8 | <270 | IU/mL |
| C3 | 96 | 65-135 | mg/dL |
| C4 | 21 | 13-35 | mg/dL |
| ANA | 1:40 (homogeneous, speckled) | <1:40 | |
| RF | 6.0 | <15 | U/mL |
CBC: complete blood count, WBC: white blood cell, RBC: red blood cell, PT-INR: prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time, s: seconds, FDP: fibrin degradation product, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, γ-GTP: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CK: creatine kinase, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein, HPF: high power field, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M, IgA: immunoglobulin A, IgE: immunoglobulin E, C3: complement 3, C4: complement 4, ANA: anti-nuclear antibody, Ab: antibody, RF: rheumatoid factor
During follow-up, she complained of worsening pain of the swollen temporal arteries. Although her ESR, CRP, D-dimer, and FDP levels remained within the normal ranges, the absolute eosinophil count (AEC) gradually increased to 742 /μL in August, 850 /μL in September, and 1,954 /μL in October, when she began to experience coolness of the fingers of both hands accompanied by cyanotic discoloration of her right ring and left index fingers. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest and echocardiography revealed no abnormalities. She also noticed small and slightly pruritic subcutaneous nodules around the lateral sides of her fingers. Color duplex ultrasonography of the hands showed occlusion of the ulnar arteries, and corkscrew architecture of all the digital arteries except the right index finger (Fig. 2B). Angiography showed occlusion of the ulnar artery, palmar arch artery, and proper palmar digital arteries (Fig. 3). Temporal artery biopsy of the right superficial temporal artery showed intense transmural infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly composed of eosinophils, which involved all three layers of the arterial wall (intima, media, and adventitia; Fig. 4D-F), intimal hyperplasia (Fig. 4A), and disruption of the internal elastic lamina (Fig. 4C). However, there was no giant cell formation. Capillary proliferation was also noted, suggesting repeated occlusion and recanalization of the artery.
Figure 3.

Angiography showing the occlusion of the ulnar artery and digital arteries. A: The right hand. The occluded portions of the ulnar and palmar digital arteries are indicated by red and black arrows, respectively. B: The left hand. The occluded portion of the palmar arch artery and narrowing of the ulnar artery are indicated by white and red arrows, respectively. Decreased blood flow in the digital arteries is also noted.
Figure 4.
A temporal artery biopsy specimen showing intense transmural infiltration of inflammatory cells, mainly composed of eosinophils in the absence of giant cell formation, and accompanied by disruption of the internal elastic lamina. A, and D-F: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. B and C: Elastica van Gieson (EVG) staining. The original magnification is indicated in parentheses. A and B: A diagonal cross-section of the temporal artery at a lower magnification power (×40). C: Disruption of the internal elastic lamina is indicated by a white arrow (×200). Eosinophilic infiltration in the intima (D), intima-media junction (E), and media-adventia junction (F) is shown (×400), indicating transluminal distribution.
The administration of prednisolone (20 mg/day) improved the acrocyanosis of both hands with the normalization of the AEC. Thus, the AEC rapidly decreased to 25 /μL after two weeks of corticosteroid treatment. Three months later when the prednisolone dose was reduced to 15 mg per day, the swelling of the remaining temporal arteries decreased. Although there were several small subcutaneous nodules in the occipital area, the biopsy specimens showed spindle-shaped cells proliferating in waves with mucoid substance accumulation, embedded within a fibrillary collagenous matrix, which was compatible with neurofibroma. Eventually, the prednisolone dose was reduced to 1 mg per day over 4 years. Meanwhile, there was no relapse of temporal arteritis, occurrence of ophthalmological problems or appearance of blood hypereosinophilia. We did not perform a second angiographic evaluation because the patient did not consent to it.
Discussion
We described the case of non-granulomatous eosinophilic vasculitis of the temporal arteries in an elderly woman with peripheral blood eosinophilia complicated by digital ischemia due to ulnar artery occlusion at the wrist-level. We considered that the patient in the present case had eosinophilic vasculitis, based on the transluminal infiltration of eosinophils with disruption of the elastic lamina. Previous studies revealed that PAN, which is characterized by necrotizing inflammation-usually involving middle-sized arteries-can affect the temporal arteries (31, 32). Of note, Oiwa et al. reported an intriguing case with HES secondary to PAN, in which the patient developed marked blood hypereosinophilia and eosinophil-rich medium-sized vasculitis (33). However, massive infiltration of eosinophils in the vessel walls is typically considered to be an unusual finding in PAN (11). In addition, the structure of the smooth muscle in the media was maintained in the present case, even though the elastic lamina was disrupted. Thus, the possibility of PAN was considered to be low in our case. Considering that the main pathological finding of the present case was eosinophilic vasculitis affecting the temporal arteries, the differential diagnosis could include JTA with eosinophilia (JTAE), EGPA, TAO affecting the temporal arteries, and HES-associated vasculitis.
On her first visit to our hospital, the enlargement of the temporal arteries suggested the possibility of GCA, which is reported to involve upper extremities in approximately 10-30% of patients (34-40). However, the upper-limb involvement had resulted in digital ischemia in this case, which is uncommon in patients with GCA (41-44). Furthermore, the temporal artery biopsy specimen did not show granulomatous giant cell formation but demonstrated intense transmural inflammation mainly composed of eosinophils. Since the histological pattern of temporal artery biopsy specimens is discontinuous in 8-28% of cases of biopsy-proven GCA, known as skip lesions (45), the absence of giant cell formation does not preclude the possibility of GCA (46). However, dense eosinophil infiltration is an atypical finding in the diagnosis of GCA (47). Another differential diagnosis was JTA, which was first described by Lie et al. (48), as a rare inflammatory disease of the temporal arteries that affects young adults in the absence of systemic vasculitis. Journeau et al. recently summarized a total of 44 patients with JTA, including 12 patients who were newly identified by a multicentric survey in France (14). It is worth noting that their study showed the presence of eosinophilia in 15 of 44 patients with JTA (14). In this regard, Fujimoto et al. had already suggested that this subtype of JTA could be a distinct disease entity, which they named JTAE (49). However, given that our patient was 60 years of age, the presentation did not fit the criteria of JTAE. Furthermore, this case was complicated by upper-limb artery occlusion. Basically, JTAE is a localized vasculitis syndrome with eosinophilic infiltration confined to the temporal arteries. Therefore, the classification of JTAE would be inappropriate in this case.
Eosinophils are considered to play a key role in the pathogenesis of EGPA, which belongs to antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated small vessel vasculitis and which is characterized by asthma and other allergic symptoms, tissue and blood eosinophilia, and necrotizing granulomatous vasculitis. The involvement of temporal arteries by eosinophilic vasculitis with (50) or without giant cell formation (51-55) has been reported in patients with EGPA. MacDiarmid et al. reported a case of EGPA complicated by radial artery occlusion at the wrist-level (55). However, the patient in the current case had no history of asthma or other allergic diseases, lung involvement, or granulomatous giant cell formation on temporal artery biopsy, and was negative for Myeloperoxidase anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, which indicated that EGPA was an unlikely diagnosis. It should be noted here that she was a smoker and that US showed corkscrew-like deformity of the digital arteries. A corkscrew collateral appearance is a characteristic angiographic finding in patients with TAO (56). Furthermore, Lie et al. described 3 cases of TAO with eosinophilia involving the temporal arteries (51). Corticosteroid-responsiveness does not preclude the possibility of TAO, since Naito et al. reported the case of a patient with TAO and blood hypereosinophilia who responded to corticosteroid treatment (19). However, in this case, angiography failed to show the typical angiographic findings of TAO, such as segmental occlusive lesions of the small and medium-sized vessels with the formation of distinctive small collateral vessels around the areas of occlusion (57). It should also be noted that several case reports have demonstrated that IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RDs) can affect the temporal arteries with the marked infiltration of the adventitia by eosinophils and plasma cells (58, 59). However, in the present case, few plasma cells were observed in the temporal artery biopsy specimen, which excluded IgG4-RDs as a strong differential diagnosis.
The remaining possibility is eosinophilic vasculitis secondary to HES. Although according to the classical definition by Chusid et al., HES is indicated by AEC >1,500/mm3 for >6 months (60), this requirement is infrequently applied today because of the need to start effective treatment early on in some patients to avoid irreversible organ damage (61). Thus, we consider that the present case-in which the AEC was >1,500/mm3 without apparent causes-can be regarded as HES. Previous studies have demonstrated that HES can cause digital ischemia either by microthrombi (62, 63), or by the occlusion of intermediate to large-sized arteries (3, 4, 6, 11). Notably, a 28-year-old Japanese man with HES presenting with eosinophilic cellulitis, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital gangrene, and JTA was described by Ito et al., who proposed that JTAE may be one of the features of HES (10). Motegi et al. also suggested the concept of eosinophilic peripheral arteritis, defined as eosinophilia with peripheral arterial occlusion by eosinophilic arteritis in the extremities and temporal arteries as a part of the clinical manifestations of HES (29). Additionally, Alzayer et al. recently described the case of a 39-year-old patient who developed left hand digital ischemia, preceded by Raynaud's phenomenon, and vasculitic rash. They showed eosinophilic vasculitis without respiratory or renal involvement with the distal left ulnar artery and the radial artery branches in the left hand showing a beaded appearance on magnetic resonance angiography (2). Moreover, they proposed that hypereosinophilic vasculitis without respiratory or renal involvement is a distinct disease entity of the primary vasculitis that has not been properly recognized in the Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference 2012 (CHCC2012) classification system (12). The further accumulation of similar cases is warranted to characterize this rare type of eosinophilic vasculitis that affects the peripheral arteries.
The present study was associated with some limitations. We did not perform a histological examination of the proper palmar digital arteries in which cork-screw deformities were observed on Doppler US. Thus, we cannot clarify which of the two mechanisms, thrombosis formed by eosinophils or vascular damage due to eosinophilic vasculitis, contributed to the digital ischemia in this case. However, artery biopsy is not routinely performed in the clinical setting in cases similar to ours as it is considered to lead to the exacerbation of digital ischemia. The negative results of the coagulation-fibrinolysis system (D-dimers and FDP) suggest that eosinophilic thrombosis was less likely to have been involved in the development of peripheral ischemia, although the possibility cannot be completely excluded. It should also be noted that eosinophilia can be secondary to a large spectrum of underlying causes, including infections such as parasitic infections, allergies, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, pulmonary eosinophilic disorders, adrenal insufficiency, and hematologic and solid neoplasms (64). Another limitation of the present case was that we did not perform molecular studies including screening for FIP1 L1-PDGFRA gene rearrangement, which should have been performed prior to corticosteroid treatment to exclude clonal eosinophil expansion. However, we consider the possibility for clonal eosinophil expansion to be low, since hypereosinophilia and the relevant clinical manifestations were well-controlled by low-dose corticosteroid treatment.
In conclusion, this report describes the case of an elderly woman with peripheral blood eosinophilia who developed non-granulomatous eosinophilic vasculitis of the temporal arteries complicated by digital ischemia, which was ameliorated by corticosteroid treatment. We consider that it is appropriate to classify the present case as eosinophilic vasculitis secondary to HES. However, eosinophilic vasculitis other than EGPA is not adequately incorporated in the CHCC2012 classification system. Thus, the classification system does not include the following eosinophilic scenarios in appropriate categories: recurrent cutaneous necrotizing eosinophilic vasculitis (65-68), cutaneous eosinophilic necrotizing vasculitis secondary to connective tissue disease (69, 70), JTAE, and eosinophilic vasculitis affecting the relatively medium-sized vessels of the limbs that is distinctive from cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis (2-11). Further studies to characterize the clinical manifestations of these eosinophilic vasculitis syndromes are necessary to establish more comprehensive nomenclature and classification of vasculitis.
The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
References
- 1.Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 89: 325-337, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alzayer H, Hasan MA. Hypereosinophilic vasculitis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 98: e15392, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hachulla E, Hatron PY, Janin A, Robert Y, Devulder B. [Digital arteritis, thrombosis and hypereosinophilic syndrome: an uncommon complication]. Rev Med Interne 16: 434-436, 1995. (in French, Abstract in English). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jang KA, Lim YS, Choi JH, Sung KJ, Moon KC, Koh JK. Hypereosinophilic syndrome presenting as cutaneous necrotizing eosinophilic vasculitis and Raynaud's phenomenon complicated by digital gangrene. Br J Dermatol 143: 641-644, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takekawa M, Imai K, Adachi M, et al. Hypereosinophilic syndrome accompanied with necrosis of finger tips. Intern Med 31: 1262-1266, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim SH, Kim TB, Yun YS, et al. Hypereosinophilia presenting as eosinophilic vasculitis and multiple peripheral artery occlusions without organ involvement. J Korean Med Sci 20: 677-679, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Oppliger R, Gay-Crosier F, Dayer E, Hauser C. Digital necrosis in a patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome in the absence of cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis. Br J Dermatol 144: 1087-1090, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stephan D, Lipsker D, Sens P, Hassani S, Welsch M. Hypereosinophilia-induced digital necrosis in a smoking patient. Int Angiol 22: 95-97, 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ponsky TA, Brody F, Giordano J, Garcia R, Kardon D, Schwartz A. Brachial artery occlusion secondary to hypereosinophilic syndrome. J Vasc Surg 42: 796-799, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ito K, Hara H, Okada T, Terui T. Hypereosinophilic syndrome with various skin lesions and juvenile temporal arteritis. Clin Exp Dermatol 34: e192-e195, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Furuya H, Ikeda K, Suzuki J, et al. Eosinophilic vasculitis affecting multiple middle-sized arteries in a patient with Kimura's disease: a case report and literature review. Allergol Int 67s: S45-S47, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 65: 1-11, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Génereau T, Lortholary O, Pottier MA, et al. ; French Vasculitis Study Group. Temporal artery biopsy: a diagnostic tool for systemic necrotizing vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum 42: 2674-2681, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Journeau L, Pistorius MA, Michon-Pasturel U, et al. Juvenile temporal arteritis: a clinicopathological multicentric experience. Autoimmun Rev 18: 476-483, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferguson GT, Starkebaum G. Thromboangiitis obliterans associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilia. Arch Intern Med 145: 1726-1728, 1985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kindem S, Sanmartin O, Llombart B, et al. Temporal artery involvement as the presenting sign of thromboangiitis obliterans. J Clin Rheumatol 19: 158-159, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lie JT, Michet CJ Jr. Thromboangiitis obliterans with eosinophilia (Buerger's disease) of the temporal arteries. Hum Pathol 19: 598-602, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Prokesch B, Law K, Conn DL. Thromboangiitis obliterans involving the temporal artery. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63: 918-920, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Naito AT, Minamino T, Tateno K, Nagai T, Komuro I. Steroid-responsive thromboangiitis obliterans. Lancet 364: 1098, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morgan GJ Jr, Harris ED Jr. Non-giant cell temporal arteritis. Three cases and a review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 21: 362-366, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lie JT, Dixit RK. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug induced hypersensitivity vasculitis clinically mimicking temporal arteritis. J Rheumatol 23: 183-185, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fontana PE, Gabutti L, Piffaretti JC, Marone C. Antibiotic treatment for giant-cell arteritis? Lancet 348: 1630, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Odeh M, Oliven A. Temporal arteritis associated with acute Q fever. A case report. Angiology 45: 1053-1057, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Doganay M, Aygen B, Inan M, Kandemir O, Turnbull P. Temporal artery inflammation as a complication of anthrax. J Infect 28: 311-314, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smith JL, Israel CW, Harner RE. Syphilitic temporal arteritis. Arch Ophthalmol 78: 284-288, 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schwartz ND, So YT, Hollander H, Allen S, Fye KH. Eosinophilic vasculitis leading to amaurosis fugax in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Intern Med 146: 2059-2060, 1986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Victor DI, Green WR. Temporal artery biopsy in herpes zoster ophthalmicus with delayed arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol 82: 628-630, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gabriel SE, Conn DL, Phyliky RL, Pittelkow MR, Scott RE. Vasculitis in hairy cell leukemia: review of literature and consideration of possible pathogenic mechanisms. J Rheumatol 13: 1167-1172, 1986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motegi SI, Sekiguchi A, Ishibuchi H, Yasuda M, Ishikawa O. Eosinophilic peripheral arteritis: peripheral arterial occlusion with eosinophilia. Eur J Dermatol 28: 97-99, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vodopivec I, Rizzo JF 3rd. Ophthalmic manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 57: ii63-ii72, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bert RJ, Antonacci VP, Berman L, Melhem ER. Polyarteritis nodosa presenting as temporal arteritis in a 9-year-old child. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20: 167-171, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yaita K, Nakaharai K, Yoshimura Y, Hirano M. Polyarteritis nodosa mimicking giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Intern Med 53: 1591-1592, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oiwa H, Taniguchi K, Miyoshi N, et al. Polyarteritis nodosa with marked eosinophilia, associated with severe gastrointestinal tract involvement and recurrent venous thrombosis. Intern Med 58: 3051-3055, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Klein RG, Hunder GG, Stanson AW, Sheps SG. Large artery involvement in giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Ann Intern Med 83: 806-812, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brack A, Martinez-Taboada V, Stanson A, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Disease pattern in cranial and large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 42: 311-317, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nuenninghoff DM, Hunder GG, Christianson TJ, McClelland RL, Matteson EL. Incidence and predictors of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years. Arthritis Rheum 48: 3522-3531, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schmidt WA, Seifert A, Gromnica-Ihle E, Krause A, Natusch A. Ultrasound of proximal upper extremity arteries to increase the diagnostic yield in large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47: 96-101, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Both M, Schulte K, Moosig F, et al. High white blood cell count in patients with giant cell arteritis predicts an increased risk of stenosis in upper extremity arteries. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1879-1880, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shibutani S, Obara H, Kan S, Takahashi S, Ogawa K, Kitagawa Y. Atypical giant cell arteritis presenting as lack of a pulse in the upper extremity. Ann Vasc Dis 4: 241-244, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Glaser J, Sharim R, Birnbaum B, Montone K, Wang G. Using temporal artery biopsy to diagnose giant cell arteritis in a patient with bilateral arm ischemia. Int J Surg Case Rep 13: 95-98, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Gennes C, Le Thi Huong D, Wechsler B, et al. Temporal arteritis revealed by upper limb gangrene. J Rheumatol 16: 130-132, 1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schmidt WA, Natusch A, Moller DE, Vorpahl K, Gromnica-Ihle E. Involvement of peripheral arteries in giant cell arteritis: a color Doppler sonography study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20: 309-318, 2002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pipitone N, Holl-Ulrich K, Gross WL, Lamprecht P. Unclassified vasculitis with acral ischemic lesions: “forme fruste” or idiopathic vasculitis? Clin Exp Rheumatol 26: S41-S46, 2008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Artifoni M, Connault J, Goueffic Y, Durant C. Digital necrosis revealing giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 66: 2090, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Murgia G, Villar I, et al. Description and validation of histological patterns and proposal of a dynamic model of inflammatory infiltration in giant-cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95: e2368, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Llorca J, Gonzalez-Louzao C, Rodriguez-Ledo P. Biopsy-negative giant cell arteritis: clinical spectrum and predictive factors for positive temporal artery biopsy. Semin Arthritis Rheum 30: 249-256, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grishman E, Wolfe D, Spiera H. Eosinophilic temporal and systemic arteritis. Hum Pathol 26: 241-244, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lie JT, Gordon LP, Titus JL. Juvenile temporal arteritis. Biopsy study of four cases. JAMA 234: 496-499, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fujimoto M, Sato S, Hayashi N, Wakugawa M, Tsuchida T, Tamaki K. Juvenile temporal arteritis with eosinophilia: a distinct clinicopathological entity. Dermatology 192: 32-35, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Amato MB, Barbas CS, Delmonte VC, Carvalho CR. Concurrent Churg-Strauss syndrome and temporal arteritis in a young patient with pulmonary nodules. Am Rev Respir Dis 139: 1539-1542, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lie JT, Nagpal S. Churg-Strauss syndrome with nongiant cell eosinophilic temporal arteritis. J Rheumatol 21: 366-367, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guerin E, Alexander P, Lanyon P, Robinson K, Foss A. A reminder that temporal arteritis is not necessarily giant cell arteritis. Eye (Lond) 23: 1608-1609, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kobayashi T, Kanno K, Kikuchi Y, et al. An atypical case of non-asthmatic eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis finally diagnosed by tissue biopsy. Intern Med 58: 871-875, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Albreiki D, Al Belushi F, Patel V, Farmer J. When a temporal artery biopsy reveals a diagnosis other than temporal arteritis: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Can J Ophthalmol 51: e108-e109, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.MacDiarmid M, Nepogodiev D, Tiwari A, Duddy M, Carey M, Jobanputra P. Eosinophilic angiitis presenting with a true, fusiform, temporal artery aneurysm. Clin Case Rep 5: 769-773, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shionoya S. Diagnostic criteria of Buerger's disease. Int J Cardiol 66 (Suppl): S243-S245; discussion S247, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Piazza G, Creager MA. Thromboangiitis obliterans. Circulation 121: 1858-1861, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Takaki M, Inozume T, Sano S, Mitsui H, Kawamura T, Shimada S. Case of giant cell arteritis as a manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease. J Dermatol 43: 1248-1249, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ikeoka K, Watanabe T, Ohkawa T, et al. IgG4-related small-sized occlusive vasculitis in Mikulicz's disease. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 5: 289-292, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chusid MJ, Dale DC, West BC, Wolff SM. The hypereosinophilic syndrome: analysis of fourteen cases with review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 54: 1-27, 1975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Simon HU, Rothenberg ME, Bochner BS, et al. Refining the definition of hypereosinophilic syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126: 45-49, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim T, Kim MR, Kim JH, Jee H, Kim SC. Extensive digital gangrene without evidence of large-vessel occlusion in hypereosinophilic syndrome. Acta Derm Venereol 91: 365-366, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ohtani T, Okamoto K, Kaminaka C, et al. Digital gangrene associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilia: treatment with allogeneic cultured dermal substitute (CDS). Eur J Dermatol 14: 168-171, 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Leru PM. Eosinophilic disorders: evaluation of current classification and diagnostic criteria, proposal of a practical diagnostic algorithm. Clin Transl Allergy 9: 36, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chen KR, Su WP, Pittelkow MR, Leiferman KM. Eosinophilic vasculitis syndrome: recurrent cutaneous eosinophilic necrotizing vasculitis. Semin Dermatol 14: 106-110, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen KR, Pittelkow MR, Su D, Gleich J, Newman W, Leiferman KM. Recurrent cutaneous necrotizing eosinophilic vasculitis. A novel eosinophil-mediated syndrome. Arch Dermatol 130: 1159-1166, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Li W, Cao W, Song H, Ciu Y, Lu X, Zhang F. Recurrent cutaneous necrotizing eosinophilic vasculitis: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol 8: 185, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sakuma-Oyama Y, Nishibu A, Oyama N, Saito M, Nakamura K, Kaneko F. A case of recurrent cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis: successful adjuvant therapy with suplatast tosilate. Br J Dermatol 149: 901-903, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen KR, Su WP, Pittelkow MR, Conn DL, George T, Leiferman KM. Eosinophilic vasculitis in connective tissue disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 35: 173-182, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yomoda M, Inoue M, Nakama T, Mori O, Chen KR, Hashimoto T. Cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Dermatol 140: 754-755, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



