Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 25;12143:205–216. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-50436-6_15

An Expanded Mixed Finite Element Method for Space Fractional Darcy Flow in Porous Media

Huangxin Chen 15,16, Shuyu Sun 16,
Editors: Valeria V Krzhizhanovskaya8, Gábor Závodszky9, Michael H Lees10, Jack J Dongarra11, Peter M A Sloot12, Sérgio Brissos13, João Teixeira14
PMCID: PMC7304701

Abstract

In this paper an expanded mixed formulation is introduced to solve the two dimensional space fractional Darcy flow in porous media. By introducing an auxiliary vector, we derive a new mixed formulation and the well-possedness of the formulation can be established. Then the locally mass-conservative expanded mixed finite element method is applied for the solution. Numerical results are shown to verify the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

Keywords: Space fractional Darcy flow, Extended mixed finite element method, Well-posedness

Introduction

Fractional partial differential equations (PDE) have been explored as an important tool to develop more accurate mathematical models to describe complex anomalous systems such as phase transitions, anomalous diffusions. In this paper, we focus on the modeling and simulation of flow in porous media. In particular, when considering modeling of flow in fractured porous media, one may consider different fractional time derivatives in matrix and fracture regions due to the different memory properties. For instance, Caputo [3] apply the time fractional PDE to model the flow in fractured porous media. However, there still exists the fact that there is a steady state for flow in fractured porous media. Thus, we consider the steady state space fractional PDE for the modeling and simulation of flow in porous media.

Until now, a number of articles referring to the space fractional PDE have appeared in literature (see [13] and the reference therein). Most of the works concern on the fractional Laplacian equation in unbounded or bounded domain, and there exist different kinds of definitions of fractional Laplacian, such as spectral/Fourier definition, singular integral representation, via the standard Laplacian (elliptic extension), directional representation, et al. Lots of numerical methods have been developed for the space fractional PDE, for instance, the finite different method, the finite volume method, the spectral method, et al (see [9, 12, 1416, 19] and the references therein). In particular, the finite element methods have been firstly developed and analyzed by Ervin, Roop for the space fractional PDE, and then by other authors in a series of works [2, 57, 18]. In these works, standard Galerkin finite element methods are always applied for the fractional Laplacian equation. However, when the standard Galerkin finite element methods are applied to the flow equation, the mass conservation can not be retained.

For the space fractional Darcy flow, J. H. He [10] firstly studied seepage flow in porous media and used fractional derivatives to describe the fractional Darcy’s law behavior. In [10], the permeability can only be assumed to be diagonal and the PDE system violates the principle of Galilean invariance. Some numerical methods have been developed for such kind of equation, e.g., see [2]. In this paper, we will apply the fractional gradient operator defined by Meerschaert et al. [17] to write down the space fractional Darcy flow for the two dimensional problem which obeys the principle of Galilean invariance. In order to develop the locally mass-conservative finite element method for the fractional Darcy flow, Chen and Wang [4] proposed a new mixed finite element method for a one-dimensional fractional Darcy flow. In this work, we extend the locally mass-conservative mixed finite element method to the two dimensional problems which can be easily extended to three dimensional problems. By introducing a new auxiliary vector, we can obtain the new expanded mixed formulation for the fractional Darcy flow and the well-possedness of the new formulation can be well established.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we introduce the mathematical model for the two dimensional space fractional Darcy flow in porous media. Then we introduce the expanded mixed formulation and establish its well-posedness in Sect. 3, and show the expanded mixed finite element method and the detailed implementation in Sect. 4. Some numerical results are given in Sect. 5 to verify the efficiency of the proposed algorithm. Finally we provide a conclusion in Sect. 6.

Preliminary

In this section we will follow [7, 17] to recall the definitions of the directional integral, the directional derivative operators, the fractional gradient operator, and then introduce the space fractional Darcy’s law which obeys the principle of Galilean invariance. We use the standard notations and definitions for Sobolev spaces (cf. [1]) throughout the paper. Since our work focus on the two dimensional problem, the following definitions are given for the functions in Inline graphic.

Definition 1

(cf. [7]). Let Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The Inline graphic-th order fractional integral in the direction Inline graphic is defined by

graphic file with name M6.gif

where Inline graphic is a Gamma function.

Definition 2

(cf. [7]). Let n be a positive integer. The n-th order derivative in the direction of Inline graphic is given by

graphic file with name M9.gif

Definition 3

(cf. [7]). Let Inline graphic. Let n be an integer such that Inline graphic, and define Inline graphic. Then the Inline graphic-th order directional derivative in the direction of Inline graphic is defined by

graphic file with name M15.gif

Definition 4

(cf. [17]). Let Inline graphic. The fractional gradient operator with respect to the measure M is defined by

graphic file with name M17.gif

where Inline graphic is a unit vector, Inline graphic is the Riemann-Liouville fractional directional derivative and Inline graphic is a positive (probability) density function satisfying Inline graphic.

By the Lemma 5.6 in [7], we have Inline graphic. Thus, we write down the steady state space fractional Darcy flow as follows:

graphic file with name M23.gif 2.1a
graphic file with name M24.gif 2.1b
graphic file with name M25.gif 2.1c

where Inline graphic are fluid velocity, pressure and source term, Inline graphic is a bounded symmetric and positive definite permeability tensor, and Inline graphic. For brevity, we consider the fractional Darcy flow in a bounded domain with homogeneous boundary condition for pressure and assume the pressure to be zero outside the domain. For the problem with non-homogeneous boundary conditions, some addition techniques such as the lifting approach and other strategies introduced in [13] can be further applied to solve the problem.

For the one dimensional space fractional diffusion equation, the regularity of solution was obtained in [8, 11]. In this work, we consider the two dimensional model and assume the regularity of solution for the system (2.1) as Inline graphic. The gravity effect can also be considered in the space fractional Darcy law as Inline graphic, and the above model can also be extended to the three dimensional problem.

Expanded Mixed Formulation

In this section we present a mass-conservative mixed formulation for the fractional Darcy flow (2.1) and establish the well-posedness of the weak formulation. Firstly we define the notations for some Sobolev spaces as follows:

graphic file with name M31.gif

In order to propose a well-posed mixed formulation for the space fractional Darcy flow, we introduce a new auxiliary vector Inline graphic. Now we present the expanded mixed formulation for (2.1) as follows: Find Inline graphic, such that

graphic file with name M34.gif 3.1a
graphic file with name M35.gif 3.1b
graphic file with name M36.gif 3.1c

for any Inline graphic. Since we assume that Inline graphic and Inline graphic are dual spaces, Inline graphic and Inline graphic, we can see that the inner products for Inline graphic and Inline graphic in (3.1) are well defined.

Now we define Inline graphic and let

graphic file with name M45.gif

for Inline graphic. Then the expanded mixed formulation (3.1) can be equivalently rewritten as follows: For any Inline graphic, find Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name M49.gif 3.2a
graphic file with name M50.gif 3.2b

In the following, we will aim to prove the well-posedness of the mixed system (3.2). We define Inline graphic. We start the proof from the following key lemma which can be proved by the similar technique in [4]. We denote by C with or without subscript a positive constant. These constants can take on different values in different occurrences.

Lemma 1

Let Inline graphic. We have that Inline graphic if and only if Inline graphic and Inline graphic.

Proof

If Inline graphic and Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name M58.gif

Since Inline graphic, we have Inline graphic, i.e., Inline graphic.

Now we let Inline graphic. Firstly, we let Inline graphic or Inline graphic in Inline graphic and we get Inline graphic. Then we let Inline graphic where Inline graphic denotes the set of all functions Inline graphic which vanish outside a compact subset of Inline graphic. Then we have

graphic file with name M71.gif

which yields that Inline graphic and Inline graphic. By the density and Sobolev imbedding theories, we have that for any Inline graphic, there exist Inline graphic and a constant Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name M77.gif

Now, for any Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name M79.gif 3.3

By the density argument and the imbedding theory, we can see that the last three terms on the right-hand side of the last equality in (3.3) become zero as Inline graphic. Thus combining the above derivation and Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name M82.gif 3.4

Since Inline graphic, we have Inline graphic, which together with (3.4) yields that Inline graphic on Inline graphic. Thus we have Inline graphic.

By the definition of fractional gradient operator, we have

graphic file with name M88.gif

Thus we obtain Inline graphic which together with Inline graphic on Inline graphic yields Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Now we conclude the proof. Inline graphic

Next we introduce another two important tools to prove the well-posedness of (3.2).

Lemma 2

(cf. [7]). Let Inline graphic. For each Inline graphic, there holds

graphic file with name M97.gif

Lemma 3

(cf. [7]). For any Inline graphic and Inline graphic, there holds the fractional Poincaré-Friedrichs inequality as follows:

graphic file with name M100.gif

Now for any Inline graphic, we denote

graphic file with name M102.gif

and

graphic file with name M103.gif

In the following, in order to show the proof in brevity, we assume the permeability tensor Inline graphic with a positive constant Inline graphic and Inline graphic is identity matrix.

Lemma 4

For any Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name M108.gif

Proof

By Lemma 1, for any Inline graphic, we have Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Then by the Theorems 2.1–2.2 in [7], the fact Inline graphic and the Lemma 2, we have

graphic file with name M113.gif

We note that Inline graphic. Then we can get the desired estimate by the above equality and the fractional Poincaré-Friedrichs inequality in the Lemma 3.Inline graphic

Lemma 5

There holds

graphic file with name M116.gif

Proof

For any Inline graphic, we let Inline graphic, then we have

graphic file with name M119.gif

By the imbedding theory, we easily have

graphic file with name M120.gif

which directly yields the desired estimate. Inline graphic

By the Lemmas 45 and the Babuška-Brezzi theory, we finally obtain the following theorem to state the well-posedness of (3.2), and this also indicates the well-posedness of the mixed system (3.1).

Theorem 1

There exists a unique solution Inline graphic for the mixed system (3.2).

Expanded Mixed Finite Element Method and Its Implementation

In this section we will introduce the expanded mixed finite element method for the mixed formulation (3.1) and show the details of implementation. Let Inline graphic be the quasi-uniform structured or unstructured mesh on Inline graphic. We define

graphic file with name M125.gif

We remark that the high order mixed finite element spaces can also be used in Inline graphic if the solution is smooth enough. For the problem with a low regularity solution, the approximation based on the low order mixed finite element space is advised. We utilize Inline graphic as the approximate spaces for Inline graphic. The expanded mixed finite element method for the space fractional Darcy flow (2.1) is defined as: Find Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name M130.gif 4.1a
graphic file with name M131.gif 4.1b
graphic file with name M132.gif 4.1c

for any Inline graphic.

We note that the key step in implementation of (4.1) is how to discretize the following term:

graphic file with name M134.gif

We assume that Inline graphic has the discrete form

graphic file with name M136.gif

where Inline graphic is the Dirac delta function. For brevity, we assume Inline graphic, then

graphic file with name M139.gif

Since Inline graphic and Inline graphic are piecewise constant vector functions with the basis functions Inline graphic and Inline graphic, the key implementation of Inline graphic lies in the computation of

graphic file with name M145.gif

where Inline graphic is an indicator function for a set S in Inline graphic.

If Inline graphic is an unstructured mesh with a triangular partition of Inline graphic, we can compute Inline graphic as follows: Let Inline graphic, Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name M154.gif

where Inline graphic are the coordinates in the rotating coordinate system (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Illustration for computing Inline graphic on the unstructured mesh.

The implementation of Inline graphic can also be similarly implemented on the structured mesh. For simplicity, we implement (4.1) on the structured mesh with

graphic file with name M158.gif

Then, when Inline graphic, we have (see Fig. 2)

graphic file with name M160.gif

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Illustration for computing Inline graphic on the structured mesh.

Numerical Experiments

In this section we show some numerical results to verify the efficiency of the expanded mixed finite element method. In the following examples, we assume the porous medium is isotropic and Inline graphic. We implement the proposed algorithm on the structured mesh with Inline graphic

Example 1

In this example we test the steady state space fractional Darcy flow (2.1) on a unit square domain with Inline graphic grid. We let Inline graphic and Inline graphic in four grid cells of Inline graphic respectively and let Inline graphic in other region.

We choose Inline graphic to test the algorithm. From Fig. 3 we can clearly see how the parameter Inline graphic influences the solution.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

With Inline graphic. Top-Left: solution of pressure (Inline graphic). Top-Right: solution of pressure (Inline graphic). Bottom-Left: solution of pressure (Inline graphic). Bottom-Right: solution of pressure (Inline graphic).

Example 2

We remark that the expanded mixed FEM can also be applied to solve the following space fractional transport in porous media:

graphic file with name M175.gif

In this example, we test the space fractional transport on Inline graphic with Inline graphic grid. We assume the velocity Inline graphic. We denote Inline graphic and let Inline graphic, Inline graphic in the local region Inline graphic and Inline graphic in other region.

We test this example by choosing Inline graphic and compute the solutions with time step Inline graphic until the time Inline graphic. From Fig. 4 we can also clearly see how the parameter Inline graphic influences the distribution of concentration at a fixed time. We can see that the diffusion effect is more obvious when the parameter Inline graphic becomes large.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The concentration solutions with different Inline graphic at Inline graphic with time step Inline graphic. Top-Left: Inline graphic. Top-Right: Inline graphic. Bottom-Left: Inline graphic. Bottom-Right: Inline graphic.

Conclusion

In this paper we discuss an expanded mixed finite element method for the solution of the two dimensional space fractional Darcy flow in porous media. The locally mass-conservation can be retained by this mixed scheme. The well-posedness of the expanded mixed formulation is proved and the implementation of the algorithm is given in details. Numerical results are shown to verify the efficiency of this mixed scheme. The mixed scheme for the space fractional Darcy flow with non-homogeneous boundary conditions will be investigated in the future work.

Footnotes

The work of Huangxin Chen was supported by the NSF of China (Grant No. 11771363, 91630204, 51661135011), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 20720180003). The work of Shuyu Sun was supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) through the grant BAS/1/1351-01-01.

Contributor Information

Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya, Email: V.Krzhizhanovskaya@uva.nl

Gábor Závodszky, Email: G.Zavodszky@uva.nl.

Michael H. Lees, Email: m.h.lees@uva.nl

Jack J. Dongarra, Email: dongarra@icl.utk.edu

Peter M. A. Sloot, Email: p.m.a.sloot@uva.nl

Sérgio Brissos, Email: sergio.brissos@intellegibilis.com.

João Teixeira, Email: joao.teixeira@intellegibilis.com.

Huangxin Chen, Email: chx@xmu.edu.cn.

Shuyu Sun, Email: shuyu.sun@kaust.edu.sa.

References

  • 1.Adams R. Sobolev Spaces. New York: Academic Press; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bu W, Tang Y, Yang J. Galerkin finite element method for two-dimensional Riesz space fractional diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2014;276:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Caputo M. Models of flux in porous media with memory. Water Resour. Res. 2000;36:693–705. doi: 10.1029/1999WR900299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen H, Wang H. Numerical simulation for conservative fractional diffusion equations by an expanded mixed formulation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2016;296:480–498. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ervin VJ, Roop JP. Variational formulation for the stationary fractional advection dispersion equation. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 2005;22:558–576. doi: 10.1002/num.20112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ervin VJ, Heuer N, Roop JP. Numerical approximation of a time dependent, nonlinear, space-fractional diffusion equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2007;45:572–591. doi: 10.1137/050642757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ervin VJ, Roop JP. Variational solution of fractional advection dispersion equations on bounded domains in Inline graphic Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 2007;23:256–281. doi: 10.1002/num.20169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ervin VJ, Heuer N, Roop JP. Regularity of the solution to 1-D fractional order diffusion equations. Math. Comput. 2018;87:2273–2294. doi: 10.1090/mcom/3295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gao G, Sun Z. A compact finite difference scheme for the fractional sub-diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2011;230:586–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He JH. Approximate analytical solution for seepage flow with fractional derivatives in porous media. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1998;167:57–68. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00108-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin B, Lazarov R, Pasciak J, Rundell W. Variational formulation of problems involving fractional order differential operators. Math. Comput. 2015;84:2665–2700. doi: 10.1090/mcom/2960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li C, Zeng F, Liu F. Spectral approximations to the fractional integral and derivative. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2012;15:383–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lischke A, et al. What is the fractional Laplacian? A comparative review with new results. J. Comput. Phys. 2020;404:109009. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu F, Zhuang P, Turner I, Burrage K, Anh V. A new fractional finite volume method for solving the fractional diffusion equation. Appl. Math. Model. 2014;38:3871–3878. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meerschaert MM, Tadjeran C. Finite difference approximations for fractional advection-dispersion flow equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2004;172:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meerschaert MM, Scheffler HP, Tadjeran C. Finite difference methods for two dimensional fractional dispersion equation. J. Comput. Phys. 2006;211:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meerschaert MM, Mortensen J, Wheatcraft SW. Fractional vector calculus for fractional advection-dispersion. Phys. A. 2006;367:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roop JP. Computational aspects of FEM approximation of fractional advection dispersion equations on bounded domains in Inline graphic J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2006;193:243–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang H, Basu TS. A fast finite difference method for two-dimensional space-fractional diffusion equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2012;34:2444–2458. doi: 10.1137/12086491X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Computational Science – ICCS 2020 are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES