Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 19;10:10011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67139-7

Multivalent and synergistic chitosan oligosaccharide-Ag nanocomposites for therapy of bacterial infection

Lin Mei 1,, Zhenlong Xu 1, Yanmei Shi 2, Chunlei Lin 1, Shuyan Jiao 1, Lijun Zhang 3, Pengxu Li 3
PMCID: PMC7305188  PMID: 32561796

Abstract

Chitosan oligosaccharide functionalized silver nanoparticles with synergistic bacterial activity were constructed as a multivalent inhibitor of bacteria. Placing the chitosan oligosaccharide on silver nanoparticles can dramatically enhance the adsorption to the bacterial membrane via multivalent binding. The multicomponent nanostructures can cooperate synergistically against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The antibacterial activity was increased via orthogonal array design to optimize the synthesis condition. The synergistic bacterial activity was confirmed by fractional inhibitory concentration and zone of inhibition test. Through studies of antimicrobial action mechanism, it was found that the nanocomposites interacted with the bacteria by binding to Mg2+ ions of the bacterial surface. Then, the nanocomposites disrupted bacterial membrane by increasing the permeability of the outer membrane, resulting in leakage of cytoplasm. This strategy of chitosan oligosaccharide modification can increase the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles and accelerate wound healing at the same time. The nanomaterial without cytotoxicity has promising applications in bacteria-infected wound healing therapy.

Subject terms: Biomedical materials, Biomedical materials

Introduction

Human health has been threatened with abuse of antibiotics and the appearance of multiple drug-resistant bacteria1,2. In the European Union, the number of deaths attributable to antibiotic-resistant bacteria is about 25,000 each year3. Therefore, it is crucial to design and develop new antimicrobial materials with high antibacterial activity and low resistance in the field of biomedicine.

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with small size and large specific surface area have a stronger antibacterial effect against different bacteria, virus, and fungi46. AgNPs can contact with bacterial cell membranes, penetrate into the cytoplasm, and then inactivate essential respiratory enzymes and proteins, leading to bacterial death7,8. However, these antibacterial action of AgNPs is often dependent on high concentration since their physical collision with bacterial surface is random9. For enhancing interaction of AgNPs and the bacteria, cationic polymers-stabilized AgNPs were designed to bind to the negatively charged cell surfaces of the bacteria by electrostatic interaction10,11. However, the toxicity of cationic polymers obstructed their biomedicine application. Then, to improve their biocompatibility, collagen-stabilized AgNPs were prepared by a photochemical method12. However, it was found that this AgNPs showed a weaker antibacterial property, comparing with small molecules-stabilized AgNPs (eg. lysine and citrate).

Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS), which is a cationic, non-immunogenic, biocompatible and an FDA-recognized mucoadhesive polymer13, with low molecular and good water-solubility is the positively charged alkaline-amino-oligosaccharide. Several biological activities of COS, such as hemostasis, antibacterial activity and anti-inflammatory effects, have been extensively studied in biomaterials field14. Conjugation with COS to the surface of AgNPs can increase their surface charge and enhance the adsorption to the negatively charged bacterial cytoplasmic membrane through electrostatic interactions. Moreover, COS as antimicrobial agent in multivalent binding can mediate the penetration of AgNPs into the bacteria15,16. To the best of our knowledge, COS-functionalized AgNPs (AgNPs-COS) as multivalent inhibitors of the bacteria has not been reported.

In this study, a green and simple method has been developed for the preparation of AgNPs-COS as a novel antimicrobial nanomaterial. AgNPs-COS can be achieved via surface-modification in situ by reduction of AgNO3 in the presence of COS. To achieve highly efficient antimicrobial ability, the synthesis conditions of AgNPs-COS are optimized by orthogonal array design (OAD). The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) and zone of inhibition test are used to characterize synergistic antimicrobial activity. Furthermore, effect of metal ions, the outer membrane permeabilization assay and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is performed to explore antibacterial action mechanism. Finally, we further explore the biocompatibility toward RAW 264.7 cells and the treatment of bacteria-induced wound infection.

Materials and methods

Materials

COS was purchased from TCI Chemical (Tokyo, Japan). Silver nitrate (AgNO3, 99.995%, metals basis, Ag 63% min), citric acid (CA) and 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) was obtained from Aladdin Chemical Reagent (Shanghai, China). E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 strains were provided by College of Life Science of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China). All solutions were prepared by the ultrapure water and stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C.

Synthesis and characterization of AgNPs-COS

Briefly, under vigorous stirring, 500 µL of 1.0% (w/w) AgNO3 and 500 µL of 1.0% (w/w) COS were added into 48 mL ultrapure water and then heated to 80 °C. 900 µL of 1.0% (w/w) CA solution was rapidly added and kept stirring for 30 min. The obtained solution (dark yellow) was dialyzed (8–14 kDa M.W. cutoff) by the ultrapure water for 12 h and stored at 4 °C for use.

The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectra of the samples were recorded on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-2700) using quartz cell. The morphology of obtained nanoparticle images was observed by a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI TECNAI G2 F20) operating at 200 kV.

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC)

The bacteria were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C and then diluted with LB broth to approximately 2.0 × 106 CFU/mL. The bacterial suspension was mixed in equal volume of two-fold diluted COS, AgNPs or AgNPs-COS solution and incubated for 8 h at 37 °C. The bacterial suspensions used for MIC determination with the antibacterial agent (COS, AgNPs or AgNPs-COS solution) were mixed during incubation. The inhibited visible growth of bacterial cells was assessed by determining an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) measured by UV-vis spectrophotometer. Each assay was carried out in triplicate.

Zone of inhibition test

After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the bacterial suspensions were diluted with LB broth and grew to approximate 5.0 × 106 CFU/mL. 50 μL of the bacterial suspensions were swabbed onto the surface of LB agar plates. Then the circular blotting paper (diameter 1.0 cm) with 100 μL COS, AgNPs or AgNPs-COS solution (at the same concentration) was gently placed in the middle of the LB agar plates, and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. The antibacterial activity was measured by evaluating the zone diameter around the disk.

Effect of Mg2+ ions on the antibacterial activity

The bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 5 min and washed with phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 0.01 mol/L, pH 7.4) three times. The supernatant was removed and the remaining bacteria were resuspended in PBS. 20 µL of MgCl2 solution was added to 1.5 mL of bacterial suspensions (approximate 1.0 × 107 CFU/mL) to a final concentration of 0.1 mmol/L. Then, 100 µL of AgNPs-COS solution (the final concentration of 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 μg/mL) was added to the suspensions and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. 1.6 mL of LB broth was added to the mixtures and incubated at 37 °C for another 8 h. The OD600 was measured using UV-vis spectroscopy.

Outer membrane permeabilization assay

E. coli cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 5 min, and rinsed with PBS three times. The final bacteria were resuspended in 1.5 mL PBS (approximate 1.0 × 107 CFU/mL). Then 50 µL of 1.0 mg/mL NPN and AgNPs-COS solution with different final concentrations were added into the above bacterial suspension. The fluorescence intensity was determined by fluorescence spectrometer (Hitachi, F-7100). An excitation wavelength was 350 nm and an emission wavelength was 370–550 nm. The control assay was performed by adding PBS instead of AgNPs-COS.

Preparation of bacterial sample for SEM

The bacterial suspension (approximate 4.0 × 107 CFU/mL) was washed with PBS and resuspended in 1.5 mL PBS. Then, 100 µL of 64 μg/mL AgNPs-COS was added for 10 min. Free AgNPs-COS was removed by centrifuging at 6000 rpm for 5 min, washing by PBS three times and resuspending in 0.5 mL PBS. The treated bacteria were placed on the poly-ɛ-lysine coated glass slide and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight. After removing the excess glutaraldehyde solution and washing with water for three times, the remaining bacterial was dehydrated with a series of ethanol aqueous solutions (30, 50, 70, 90, 95, 100% v/v) for 10 min successively and dried in a freeze dryer. The sample was glued to the aluminum stud with double-sided adhesive conductive tape. After treated with platinum spraying, the bacterial morphology was observed using a field emission SEM (FEI Quanta 250 FEG).

Cytotoxicity test

The RAW 264.7 cells were obtained from Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou, China). The cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in 5% CO2/95% air at 37 °C. The cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 104 cells per well and further incubated for 24 h. Then the medium in the wells was replaced with the different concentrations of AgNPs-COS solution. After incubation for 24 h, 10 µL of 5% MTT solution was added into each well and further incubated for 4 h. After removing the medium containing MTT, 100 µL of DMSO was added into each well to dissolve the formazan crystals with low-speed shaking for 15 min. The OD570 value was measured using a microplate reader. The untreated cells were used as positive control.

In vivo tests

Male Wistar rats (weighing 190–210 g) were offered from Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou, China). Animal welfare and experimental procedures were strictly performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Approval Number: DWLL2018030038) and the protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Henan University of Chinese Medicine.

The rats were anaesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate and then shaved the hair on the backs. A full thickness cutaneous wound within a defined 1.0 cm i.d. circular area was made and then injected with 50 µL bacterial suspension (S. aureus, approximate 2.0 × 107 CFU/mL) by a pipette tip. The bacterial suspension was evenly applied to the wound surface to ensure that the bacteria was only spread on the wound. After modeling success, there were the secretions of yellowish pus from infected tissue. The rats were divided into four groups and each group had six rats. Daily therapy was administered 50 µL 8.0 µg/mL AgNPs-COS, 75% ethanol, and 0.9% NaCl solution to the wounds of three groups once a day, respectively. The wounds of the fourth group were untreated as the blank control. After 12 days, the skin tissues in contact with the samples were collected for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for histopathology evaluation and Collagen I immunohistochemical analysis by a Rat Collagen I Immunohistochemistry Kit.

The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze the relative expression levels of the various genes. The reaction was performed by a Fluorescent Quantitative PCR Detector (7000 Fast, ThermoFisher) and SYBR Green I qRT-PCR Master Mix (MCE) was used. For the specificity of the amplification in the reactions, the melting curve and gel electrophoresis were used in assessment of qRT-PCR products. The condition of qRT-PCR cycling was 95 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles. The relative expression level of each gene was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCq method. Primers used for the qRT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of Collagen I and other genes were listed in Supplementary Table S1 online.

Results and discussion

Orthogonal array design for optimizing the synthesis conditions of AgNPs-COS

AgNPs-COS were synthesized via reduction of AgNO3 by CA at 80 °C in the presence of COS in water. The amine groups of COS can complex with silver cations and then conjugated on the growing AgNPs surface following reduction process. The antibacterial activity of AgNPs-COS was related to the amount of AgNO3, COS, and CA in synthesis process. The amount of AgNO3 and CA was found to be related to the size of AgNPs-COS and then can affect the antibacterial activity of AgNPs-COS. COS as capping groups to the AgNPs surface can stabilize AgNPs and then affect the surface plasmon resonance absorbance of AgNPs. OAD can quickly generate useful information on key variable by arranging different factors within a single experiment. The results of OAD can then be analyzed by analysis of variance. Optimization of synthesis condition via an OAD would reduce the amount of experiments and costs17,18. Therefore, OAD was used to optimize experimental conditions of AgNPs-COS. In this study, the synthesis conditions include three factors: the amount of AgNO3, COS, and CA. Therefore, an OAD L9 (34) was used to evaluate effects of these factors. Each factor was evaluated in three levels. Experiments were carried out with 1.0% (w/w) AgNO3 solution at 300, 500, or 700 µL, 1.0% (w/w) COS solution at 200, 500, or 800 µL, and 1.0% (w/w) CA solution at 300, 600, or 900 µL, respectively. The OAD experiments were performed according to Table 1. Subsequently, the MIC values against S. aureus and E. coli were determined to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the nine synthesized AgNPs-COS and the results were shown in Tab. 1. Clearly, AgNPs-COS synthesized by the optimum synthesis conditions (No.5 in Table 1) can obtain the lowest MIC value and act synergistic antibacterial functions against gram-positive (S. aureas) and gram-negative bacteria (E. coli). Therefore, the optimum conditions were 500 µL of 1.0% (w/w) AgNO3 solution, 500 µL of 1.0% (w/w) COS solution, and 900 µL of 1.0% (w/w) CA solution, respectively. Under this condition, synthesized AgNPs-COS achieved the desired antimicrobial activities toward both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Table 1.

Factors and levels for L9 (34) OAD experiments and MIC for AgNPs-COS against S. aureas and E. coli.

No. Amount of Amount of Amount of MIC against MIC against
AgNO3 (μL) COS (μL) CA (μL) S aureas (μg/mL) E coli (μg/mL)
1 300 200 300 2.56 ± 0.49 1.83 ± 0.65
2 300 500 600 1.98 ± 0.12 1.64 ± 0.35
3 300 800 900 1.42 ± 0.22 0.96 ± 0.24
4 500 200 600 1.56 ± 0.55 1.11 ± 0.40
5 500 500 900 0.78 ± 0.26 0.51 ± 0.18
6 500 800 300 1.21 ± 0.43 0.82 ± 0.26
7 700 200 900 1.78 ± 0.47 1.35 ± 0.27
8 700 500 300 1.82 ± 0.53 1.37 ± 0.45
9 700 800 600 1.19 ± 0.30 0.97 ± 0.33

Characterization of AgNPs-COS

UV-vis absorption spectrum was used to confirm the formation of AgNPs-COS. The spectra of AgNPs and AgNPs-COS were shown in Fig. 1. Compared with the absorption spectrum of AgNPs, the maximum absorption wavelength of AgNPs-COS showed a blue shift from 400 to 391 nm. Moreover, the peak intensity of AgNPs-COS was higher than that of AgNPs. COS as stabilizers was beneficial to the nucleation and growth of nanoparticles and avoided the formation of these large nanoparticles. In addition, the surface charge analysis was performed. The zeta potential of AgNPs was −20.3 mV. Although AgNPs with a large number of negative charges can maintain stability in aqueous solution, the interaction between AgNPs and the bacteria is impeded by electrostatic repulsion. However, the zeta potential of AgNPs-COS was 11.3 mV, which could enhance their adsorption to negatively charged bacterial membranes by electrostatic interaction. This result indicated that COS molecules successfully binding to the AgNPs surface.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UV-vis spectra of AgNPs and AgNPs-COS. Inset: TEM image (A) and size distribution (B) of AgNPs-COS.

The morphology of AgNPs-COS was observed by TEM (Fig. 1, inset A). It can be found that the obtained nanoparticles were spherical with good dispersibility and COS coated on AgNPs surface in the core-shell module. The average diameter of AgNPs-COS was 36.7 nm (Fig. 1, inset B). Because of conjugation of COS onto AgNPs surface, the edge of AgNPs-COS emerged light corona (Fig. 1, inset A) compared with AgNPs (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online).

Study of synergistic antimicrobial activity

The FIC index was employed to detect any synergistic antimicrobial effect between AgNPs and COS by a two-dimensional microdilution assay. The FIC was calculated as follows:

FIC=MICofcompoundAincombinationMICofcompoundAalone+MICofcompoundBincombinationMICofcompoundBalone

If the FIC index was less than 0.5, the interaction was defined as synergistic effect19. The results showed that the FIC indices were 0.34 and 0.29 against S. aureus and E. coli, respectively, indicating that COS binding to the AgNPs can obtain synergistic antimicrobial effect.

The synergistic effects between AgNPs and COS was also verified by zone of the inhibition test. For this purpose, COS, AgNPs, and AgNPs-COS at a final concentration of 100, 64, and 64 μg/mL, respectively, was prepared. From Fig. 2, the diameters of zone of inhibition of AgNPs-COS were significantly larger than those of COS and AgNPs, indicating that AgNPs-COS had better antimicrobial performance compared with COS and AgNPs. The outstanding synergistic activity of COS and AgNPs was also confirmed against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Moreover, COS was used as stabilizers to protect AgNPs against agglomeration for retaining their diffusivity and enhancing antimicrobial property.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Inhibition zones of COS (A,D), AgNPs (B,E) and AgNPs-COS (C,F) against S. aureus (AC) and E. coli (DF).

Effect of Mg2+ ions on the antibacterial activity of AgNPs-COS

To explore the binding sites of AgNPs-COS on the bacterial surface, the effects of Mg2+ ion on the bacterial growth inhibition were examined. From Fig. 3, OD600 value of S. aureus and E. coli were obviously increased when Mg2+ ions were added to the bacterial suspensions in the presence of AgNPs-COS with different concentration. It was indicated that the antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles decreased. It has been reported that the lipopolysaccharide (on the surface of the gram-negative bacteria, e.g. E. coli) linked with Mg2+ ions via electrostatic interaction to form a stable structure on the surface of the bacterial membrane20,21. However, amino group of COS can chelate Mg2+ ions by metal-to-ligand π-bonding. Then the lipopolysaccharide was isolated and dispersed to the medium, result in the damage of the outer membrane of the bacteria. When Mg2+ ions were added to the bacterial suspension, the COS of the nanoparticle surface would chelate Mg2+ ions in the medium, thereby avoiding replacement of these ions from their binding sites in lipopolysaccharide. Similarly, in gram-positive bacteria (e.g. S. aureus), the teichoic acids of the bacterial cell wall can attract Mg2+ ions to provide rigidity to the cell wall22. When COS of the nanoparticle surface chelated Mg2+ ions from these original sites on the bacterial surface, teichoic acid would be dispersed to the medium and the bacterial cell wall would be damaged. Therefore, AgNPs-COS can interact with the bacteria by binding to Mg2+ of the bacterial surface.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of Mg2+ ions (the final concentration of 0.1 mmol/L) on the antibacterial activities against E. coli and S. aureus with different concentration.

The permeability of outer membrane

The interaction of AgNPs-COS with outer membrane of E. coli cells was studied using the hydrophobic fluorescent probe NPN, which has strong fluorescence in hydrophobic environments and weak fluorescence in aqueous environments23,24. When AgNPs-COS disorganized outer membrane of bacterial cell, NPN could partition into the phopholipid layer of the outer membrane, which can increase NPN fluorescence intensity. As shown in Fig. 4, NPN fluorescent intensity in E. coli suspensions was increased with the increase in the nanoparticles concentration and interaction time. The fluorescent intensity reached a plateau after approximately 20 min, which indicated that AgNPs-COS can permeabilizate the cell membrane and destroy the integrality of bacterial cell.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Change of NPN fluorescence intensity with different times and AgNPs-COS concentrations.

Morphological change of the bacteria by SEM observation

The morphological change of S. aureus and E. coli before and after incubation with AgNPs-COS were investigated via SEM observations. Untreated S. aureus and E. coli had a smooth surface with the integrity of membrane structure (Fig. 5A,C). In contrast, the morphology of the treated bacteria is altered significantly after incubation with 4.0 µg/mL AgNPs-COS for 10 min (Fig. 5B,D). The cell walls of S. aureus had formed a large number of vesicles (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, the leakage of large cytoplasmic components can be observed on the cytomembrane of E. coli (Fig. 5D). Similar SEM images of various bacteria had been also observed in that of the treated bacteria2527. The thickness of the peptidoglycan layer of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was difference. When the bacteria interacted with AgNPs-COS for 10 min, S. aureus with the thick peptidoglycan layer formed the vesicles (small leakage of cytoplasmic components) and E. coli with the thin peptidoglycan layer represented large leakage of cytoplasmic components. It indicates that AgNPs-COS can disrupt the bacterial membrane, leading to leakage of cytoplasm. Then the damaged membrane can destroy the structural integrity and the membrane ability, resulting in bacterial death.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SEM images of S. aureus (A,B) and E. coli (C,D) before (A,C) and after (B,D) being treated with AgNPs-COS for 10 min.

The antimicrobial mechanisms of AgNPs-COS are possibly as follows. AgNPs-COS interact with the bacteria by binding to Mg2+ ions of the bacterial surface. Then, the nanoparticles disrupt bacterial membrane via increasing the permeability of the outer membrane, resulting in leakage of cytoplasm. These are possibly reasons causing bacterial cell death.

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity of AgNPs-COS was investigated in Raw246.7 cells by MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 6, no obvious cytotoxicity was observed at a concentration up to 128 μg/mL, which had exceeded 160-fold and 250-fold MIC against S. aureus and E. coli, respectively (Table 1, No.5). Moreover, the toxicity of AgNPs can be improved by binding to the COS with good biocompatibility. Therefore, the nanoparticles had the potential for in vivo use.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Cell viability after incubation as a function of AgNPs and AgNPs-COS concentrations for 24 h determined by MTT assay.

In vivo study

To explore the healing status of the wound infection with S. aureus, 8.0 µg/mL AgNPs-COS, 75% ethanol or 0.9% NaCl solution were administered to the wounds of every group for daily therapy, respectively. The physical measurement of wound area before the treatment and during the treatment were evaluated by wound photographs. From Fig. 7, the wounds of AgNPs-COS group and ethanol group were healed after 12 days. However, the wounds treated with NaCl and without treatment were not healed. Histological evaluation of rat dermal wound was performed at the 12th days after treatment and representative optical micrographs by H&E staining were showed in Fig. 8. The epithelialization underlying wound connective tissues were observed by the therapy of AgNPs-COS or ethanol. Meanwhile, a few inflammatory cells emerged from the 75% ethanol-treated wounds. However, massive inflammatory cells appear from the 0.9% NaCl solution-treated and untreated wounds. From immunohistochemical staining of rat epidermal tissues, NaCl group and blank control group had more collagen I (brown parts or dots) than ethanol group and AgNPs-COS group. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 9, relative expression levels of collagen I were significantly increased in the rat skin tissues of NaCl group and blank control group, indicated inflammation still exists. Meanwhile, the results of relative expression levels of keratin, fibronectin and laminin illustrated that AgNPs-COS can promote wound healing of bacterial infection without inflammation2831.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Wound photographs of the rats with the different treatment for 1 day, 6 days and 12 days, respectively.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Representative optical micrographs (20×) by H&E staining and immunohistochemical staining of rat skin with the different treatment.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Relative expression levels of collagen I, keratin, fibronectin and laminin in the rat skin tissues. (The error bars indicate means ± SD (n = 3); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Conclusions

AgNPs-COS was synthesized as a new antimicrobial material via surface-modification in situ. These antibacterial activity could be improved via OAD optimization of synthesis condition. This nanoparticles with synergistic antimicrobial activities could efficiently inhibit the growth of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The studies of antimicrobial mechanism indicated that AgNPs-COS could combine with Mg2+ ions of the bacterial surface, interact with the bacterial membrane and increase the permeability of the outer membrane. These interactions will lead to the damage of bacterial membrane and the death of the bacteria. This antimicrobial material has a great potential for the wound healing of damaged skin tissues accompanied with bacterial infection, and will be widely applicable for combating multiple bacteria-induced infectious diseases in medical field.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51703259) and Henan University of Chinese Medicine (03301282).

Author contributions

Designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript: Lin Mei; performed the experiments: Zhenlong Xu, Lijun Zhang and Pengxu Li; supervised the cytotoxicity and animal experiment: Yanmei Shi; analyzed experimental data: Chunlei Lin and Shuyan Jiao.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zgurskaya HI, López CA, Gnanakaran S. Permeability barrier of Gram-negative cell envelopes and approaches to bypass it. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015;1:512–522. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Panáček A, et al. Bacterial resistance to silver nanoparticles and how to overcome it. Nat. Nanotech. 2018;13:65–71. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0013-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lim, C., et al. Epidemiology and burden of multidrugresistant bacterial infection in a developing country. Elifev5, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Yuan L, et al. Stress responses of aquatic plants to silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:2558–2565. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGillicuddy E, et al. Silver nanoparticles in the environment: Sources, detection and ecotoxicology. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;575:231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miller KP, Wang L, Benicewiczb BC, Decho AW. Inorganic nanoparticles engineered to attack bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:7787–7807. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00041F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mei L, et al. Bioconjugated nanoparticles for attachment and penetration into pathogenic bacteria. Biomaterials. 2013;34:10328–10337. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao Y, et al. Small molecule-capped gold nanoparticles as potent antibacterial agents that target gram-negative bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:12349–12356. doi: 10.1021/ja1028843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Y, et al. Hyperbranched poly (amidoamine) as the stabilizer and reductant to prepare colloid silver nanoparticles in situ and their antibacterial activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:2330–2336. doi: 10.1021/jp075436g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song J, Kang H, Lee C, Hwang SH, Jang J. Aqueous synthesis of silver nanoparticle embedded cationic polymer nanofibers and their antibacterial activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2011;4:460–465. doi: 10.1021/am201563t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mei L, Lu Z, Zhang X, Li C, Jia Y. Polymer-Ag nanocomposites with enhanced antimicrobial activity against bacterial infection. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014;6:15813–15821. doi: 10.1021/am502886m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alarcon EI, et al. The biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of collagen-stabilized, photochemically prepared silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4947–4956. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peniche C, et al. Chitosan: an attractive biocompatible polymer for microencapsulation. Macromol Biosci. 2003;3:511–520. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200300019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang N, Li WH. Facile one-pot synthesis of chitosan oligosaccharide/silver nanocomposites and their antimicrobial properties. Mater. Lett. 2014;132:145–148. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moon JS, et al. The antibacterial and immunostimulative effect of chitosan-oligosaccharides against infection by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;75:989–998. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-0898-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benhabiles MS, et al. Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocolloid. 2012;29:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.02.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Y, et al. Sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay by capillary electrophoresis with gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2011;83:1137–1143. doi: 10.1021/ac103166n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Li X, Yuan Z, Lu Y. Orthogonal array design experiments for optimizing the separation of nine pesticides by micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Microchem. J. 2002;73:307–315. doi: 10.1016/S0026-265X(02)00096-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar SN, Siji JV, Nambisan B, Mohandas C. Activity and synergistic interactions of stilbenes and antibiotic combinations against bacteria in vitro. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;28:3143–3150. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vaara M. Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane. Microbiol. Rev. 1992;56:395–411. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.56.3.395-411.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003;67:593–656. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wickham JR, Halye JL, Kashtanov S, Khandogin J, Rice CV. Revisiting magnesium chelation by teichoic acid with phosphorus solid-state NMR and theoretical calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:2177–2183. doi: 10.1021/jp809313j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Loh B, Grant C, Hancock RE. Use of the fluorescent probe 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine to study the interactions of aminoglycoside antibiotics with the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1984;26:546–551. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.4.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ibrahim HR, Sugimoto Y, Aoki T. Ovotransferrin antimicrobial peptide (OTAP-92) kills bacteria through a membrane damage mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1523:196–205. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mei L, et al. Multivalent polymer–Au nanocomposites with cationic surfaces displaying enhanced antimicrobial activity. Polym. Chem. 2014;5:3038–3044. doi: 10.1039/c3py01578e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mangoni ML, et al. Effects of the antimicrobial peptide temporin L on cell morphology, membrane permeability and viability of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 2004;380:859–865. doi: 10.1042/bj20031975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dai X, et al. All-in-one NIR-activated nanoplatforms for enhanced bacterial biofilm eradication. Nanoscale. 2018;10:18520–18530. doi: 10.1039/C8NR04748K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hertle MD, et al. Aberrant integrin expression during epidermal wound healing and in psoriatic epidermis. J. Clin. Invest. 1992;89:1892–1901. doi: 10.1172/JCI115794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saarialho-Kere UK, et al. Cell-matrix interactions modulate interstitial collagenase expression by human keratinocytes actively involved in wound healing. J. Clin. Invest. 1993;92:2858–2866. doi: 10.1172/JCI116906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Swamy SMK, et al. “Role of phenytoin in wound healing: microarray analysis of early transcriptional responses in human dermal fibroblasts. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 2004;314:661–666. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.12.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aukhil I. Biology of wound healing. Periodontology. 2000;2000(22):44–50. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES