Skip to main content
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine logoLink to Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
. 2020 May 31;8(1):e61.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Roxana Sadeghi 1,2, Asrin Babahajian 3, Arash Sarveazad 4,5,*, Naser Kachoueian 6, Mansour Bahardoust 4,7,*
PMCID: PMC7305656  PMID: 32613203

Abstract

Introduction:

Currently, the basis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) therapy is dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Aspirin as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and clopidogrel as adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to answer that should DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel be continued until coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients who have ACS?

Methods:

The search for relevant studies in the present meta-analysis is based on three approaches: A) systematic searches in electronic databases, B) manual searches in Google and Google Scholar, and C) screening of bibliography of related original and review articles. The endpoints included mortality rate, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion after CABG.

Results:

After the initial screening, 41 articles were studied in detail, and finally the data of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. DAPT before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events, but increases reoperation, re-exploration, length of ICU, and hospital stay. Chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate significantly increased in the DAPT group compared to the control group (non-antiplatelet or Aspirin alone). Increase in chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate indicates an increase in bleeding, so increase in reoperation, re-exploration to control bleeding, and, subsequently, increase in the length of ICU and hospital stay are expected.

Conclusions:

DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events despite more bleedings, and it may be suggested before CABG for better graft patency.

Key Words: Dual anti-platelet therapy, coronary artery bypass, acute coronary syndrome, aspirin, clopidogrel

Introduction

Antiplatelet drugs, due to their key role in the prevention of clot formation in the vessels, are the main treatment strategy for disorders such as ischemic stroke, angina, non-ST, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (1). Currently, the basis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) therapy is dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Aspirin as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and clopidogrel as an adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, which reduce thrombotic and ischemic disorders (2-4). The use of DAPT in patients with ACS who are candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is like a double-edged sword, which on the one hand reduces the risk of ischemia but on the other hand, increases the risk of bleeding. So, the risk of bleeding following the Aspirin or clopidogrel intake alone increases by up to 20%, and after combination therapy, it increases by up to 50% (5, 6). The amount of blood lost after CABG is very important and several studies have reported evidence against antiplatelet therapy, which increases the rate of blood loss after CABG (7-10). However, antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of ischemia and so there is strong evidence to administrate it for CABG candidates (7, 11). The decision on whether DAPT (Aspirin and clopidogrel) should be continued or discontinued at a specific time before surgery of patients undergoing CABG is crucial for optimum management of these patients. The level of evidence in existing guidelines is moderate to low and they are derived from small studies (12-14). Therefore, the available evidence on the application of DAPT in CABG patients is not enough to make a definitive decision. For achieving a definitive conclusion on this issue, performing a systematic review can be helpful. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to answer that should DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel be continued until CABG in patients who have ACS? We assessed the effect of DAPT on mortality rate, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage, and blood product transfusion after CABG.

Material and Methods

Study design

In the present meta-analysis, data from studies that assayed DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG were entered. PICO definition is presented as follows:

P: CABG candidates

I: DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel

C: Comparison with the control group (Aspirin alone or non-antiplatelet therapy)

O: Mortality rate, MI, CVA, reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage, and need for blood product transfusion after CABG

Search strategy

The search for relevant studies in the present meta-analysis was based on three approaches: A) systematic searches in electronic databases, B) manual searches in Google and Google Scholar, and web pages of reliable organizations (gray literature), and C) screening of bibliography of related original and review articles. Initially, keywords were selected by consulting with an expert, using MeSH and Emtree, and screening of related articles and journals. Then, searches were performed in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, separately. The search query in the Medline database is presented in an appendix.

Eligibility criteria

Clinical trials, quasi-experimental and controlled studies that evaluated DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG surgery without applying any limitation about time, language, age, sex, and ethnicity were included in the present meta-analysis. Studies that used Aspirin or clopidogrel alone (without dual antiplatelet) as the treatment group, studies without a control group (whether non-antiplatelet therapy or Aspirin-treated alone), and retracted articles were excluded.

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment

The search records were imported into EndNote software and duplicated studies were removed. Two independent reviewers screened the title and abstracts of search results and after careful assessment of the studies, data were extracted and summarized in the data extraction form. In case of disagreement between the two reviewers, the third reviewer determined the result after discussions with the other two reviewers, and the relevant data was imported. The extracted data included first author’s name, publication year, country, study type, age, sample size, the interval between discontinuation and surgery (days), outcomes. If the data could not be extracted from the study, the researcher asked the corresponding author to provide the data. In the cases that outcomes and values were published at different time points, the last evaluation time was considered. If a study reported the results as a graph, the data were extracted by "data extraction from graph method", explained by Sistrom and Mergo (15). The risk of bias assessment of clinical trials was evaluated with Cochrane's proposed guideline (16). The risk of bias assessment of cohort studies was performed using the National Institute of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (17).

Outcomes

Assessed outcomes included mortality rate, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage, and blood product transfusion after CABG.

Statistics

STATA version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for statistical analyses. Using "metan" command, we performed a pooled analysis (random or fixed effect analysis based on heterogeneity among studies). Findings were presented as an overall odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). There were two separate control groups among eligible studies: non-antiplatelet therapy and Aspirin-treated alone. Therefore, we stratified the analysis in two sections according to the control groups. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 test and p values less than 0.1 were considered as heterogeneity. Funnel Plot and Egger's tests were used to identify publication bias (18).

Results

Characteristics

The search yielded 4003 non-duplicate records. After the initial screening, 41 studies were assessed in detail, and finally, the data of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis (5, 6, 19-31) (Figure 1). There were 4 randomized clinical trials, 5 prospective cohort studies, and 6 retrospective cohort studies. These studies included 8029 patients in total. 6113 patients had not received any antiplatelet medication at least 5 days before CABG surgery or had only taken aspirin (non-dual APT group), and 1871 patients had used the DAPT group until the day of CABG surgery. The non-DAPT group in 7 studies had not taken any medication during the 5 days leading up to surgery, in 4 studies patients had taken Aspirin alone and the other 4 studies had two separate control arms with no-medication or Aspirin. The outcomes examined in the studies included mortality rate, MI, CVA, reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage, platelet transfusion, RBC transfusion, FFP transfusion, total blood product transfusion, and major bleeding. Since major bleeding was reported in only two studies, this part of the analysis was omitted because study power was low in this section (due to the small number of entered studies). However, chest tube drainage practically indicates bleeding (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the present study.

Table 1.

Summary of included studies

Author; year; country Study type Mean age Number of females Sample size Number of patients in discontinued group Number of patients in Dual APT group APT in discontinued group Interval between discontinuation and surgery (days) FU Outcome
Blasco-Colmenares; 2009; USA RCS 66 503 1677 1483 194 Aspirin 5 24 hrs Mortality; Reoperation; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Total blood product transfusion;
Gielen; 2015; Netherlands RCT 65 66 1065 775 290 Neither and aspirin 10 48 hrs Mortality; CVA; Reoperation; MI; Length of hospital stay; Length of ICU stay; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion
Heidari; 2016; Iran RCT 58.7 31 100 50 50 Neither 5 Postoperative Re-exploration
Hekmat; 2004; Germany RCS 63 29 290 145 145 Neither 5 24 hrs Mortality; MI; Renal failure; Length of hospital stay; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion
Hongo; 2002; USA PCS 66.9 60 216 165 51 Neither and aspirin 7 Postoperative Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Cryoprecipitate transfusion
Hoxha; 2018; Albania RCT 67.6 90 300 77 223 Neither 7 24 hrs Mortality; MI; CVA; Renal failure; Reoperation; Length of ICU stay; Major bleeding; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Cryoprecipitate transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
Kremke; 2013; Denmark PCS 67 386 2205 1972 233 Neither and aspirin 5 Postoperative Reoperation; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
Miceli; 2012; UK RCS 65.2 119 618 331 287 Neither 5 Postoperative Mortality; MI; CVA; Renal failure; Re-exploration; Other cardiac events; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion
Ouattara; 2007; France PCS 65.5 51 217 157 60 Aspirin NA 24 hrs Chest tube drainage
Plicner; 2015; Poland PCS 70 26 102 50 52 Aspirin NA 12 hrs Chest tube drainage; RBC Transfusion; FFP Transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
Pons; 2008; Mexico PCS NR 36 49 25 24 Neither 6 24 hrs Mortality; MI; CVA; Reoperation; Other cardiac events
Ray; 2003; Canada RCS 63.3 119 648 602 46 Neither and Aspirin 7 48 hrs Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Cryoprecipitate transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
Straus; 2018; Bosnia RCS 62.1 35 131 41 90 Aspirin NA 48 hrs Reoperation; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
Zhu; 2018; China RCT 48.5 50 120 60 60 Neither 7 Postoperative Length of ICU stay; Length of hospital stay; Major bleeding; Chest tube drainage; Platelet transfusion; RBC transfusion; FFP transfusion; Total blood product transfusion
von Heymann; 2005; Germany RCS 66.5 63 291 225 66 Neither 7 Postoperative Reoperation; Chest tube drainage; RBC transfusion; Total blood product transfusion

APT: Antiplatelet therapy; FFP: Fresh frozen plasma; FU: Follow-up duration; PCS: Prospective cohort study; RCS: Retrospective cohort study; RBC: Red blood cells; RCT: Randomized clinical trial; MI: myocardial infarction; CVA: cardiovascular accident; ICU: intensive care unit.

Risk of bias and publication bias assessment

Four RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. According to the Cochrane risk of bias tool (Table S1), risk of bias was low in all items in Hoxha et al. (24) study. However, in Gielen et al. (20) study, allocation concealment and blinding status were unclear. In Heidari et al. (21) study, random sequence generation had a low risk of bias and other items had unclear risk of bias. All items of Cochrane risk of bias tools had unclear/high risk of bias in Zhu et al. (31) study. 11 cohort studies were included. The risk of bias assessment based on NIH tools showed that no study reported the duration of antiplatelet therapy before allocation to groups (item 8 in Table S2). In addition, the flow of exposure-outcome assessment (item 5 in Table S2) was not reported in 7 studies, and adjustment for potential confounders was not performed in 6 studies (item 14 in Table S2). Also, the blinding status of outcome assessors and participants were not reported or were not performed in all studies (item 12 in Table S2). Publication bias assessment is presented in figures S1-S4. There is no evident publication bias in any of the analyses.

Comparison of DAPT versus non-antiplatelet therapy 5 days before surgery

Mortality

Mortality data from 5 articles were included in the analyses of this section (20, 22, 24-26). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.616). Figure 2 shows that the amount of mortality in the DAPT group after CABG is equal to the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.65 to 4.07).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plots for comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy with non-antiplatelet therapy 5 days before surgery on postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), reoperation and re-exploration, renal failure, and other cardiac events (atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, and heart failure) in CABG patients. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio

MI

MI data from 5 articles were included in the analyses of this section (20, 22, 24-26). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 11.1%; p <0.343). Figure 2 shows that the amount of MI in the DAPT group after CABG is less than the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.32).

CVA

CVA data from 4 articles were included in the analyses of this section (20, 24-26). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.996). Figure 2 shows that the amount of CVA in the DAPT group after CABG is equal to the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.29 to 2.82).

Reoperation

Reoperation data from 5 articles (2 articles containing two sets of data) were included in the analyses of this section (5, 20, 24, 25, 30, 32). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.836). Figure 2 shows that the amount of reoperation in the DAPT group after CABG is 2 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.28 to 3.07).

Re-exploration

Re-exploration data from 2 articles were included in the analyses of this section (21, 26). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 52.8%; p <0.146). Figure 2 shows that the amount of re-exploration in the DAPT group after CABG is 3 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.14 to 8.21).

Renal failure

Renal failure data from 3 articles were included in the analyses of this section (22, 24, 26). Results of this section indicates heterogeneity (I2 = 14.6%; p <0.310). Figure 2 shows that the amount of renal failure in the DAPT group after CABG is equal to the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.74 to 2.18).

Other cardiac events

Other cardiac events’ data from 4 articles were included in the analyses of this section (25, 26). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.656). Figure 2 shows that the amount of other cardiac events in the DAPT group after CABG is less than the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23).

Length of ICU stay

Length of ICU stay data from 4 articles were included in the analyses of this section (20, 22, 24, 31). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.817). Figure 3 shows that the length of ICU stay in the DAPT group after CABG is 1.3 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.65).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plots for comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy with non-antiplatelet therapy 5 days before surgery on postoperative length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay in CABG patients. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio

Length of hospital stay

Length of hospital stay data from 3 articles were included in the analyses of this section (20, 22, 31). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 67.6%; p <0.046). Figure 3 shows that the length of hospital stay in the DAPT group after CABG is 1.4 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.83).

Chest tube drainage

Chest tube drainage data from 8 articles were included in the analyses of this section (5, 20, 22-24, 26, 30, 31). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 89.5%; p <0.0001). Figure 4 shows that the amount of Chest tube drainage in the DAPT group after CABG is 2.5 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.65 to 4.07).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Forest plots for comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy with non-antiplatelet therapy 5 days before surgery on postoperative chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion in CABG patients. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; RBC: Red blood cell

RBC transfusion

RBC transfusion data from 9 articles were analyzed in this section (5, 20, 22-24, 26, 29-31). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 61.1%; p = 0.008). Figure 4 shows that in the DAPT group, RBC transfusion value is 2 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.48).

Platelet transfusion

Platelet transfusion data from 8 articles were analyzed in this section (5, 20, 22-24, 26, 29, 31). Results of this section indicate high heterogeneity (I2 = 82.9%; p <0.0001). Figure 4 shows that in the DAPT group, platelet transfusion value is 4.5 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 4.46; 95% CI: 2.74 to 7.26).

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion data from 7 articles were included in the analyses of this section (5, 20, 22, 23, 26, 29, 31). Results of this section show heterogeneity (I2 = 39.8%; p = 0.126). Figure 4 shows that in the DAPT group, the amount of fresh frozen plasma transfusion after CABG is 2.2 times higher than that of the non-antiplatelet therapy group (SMD = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.81).

Cryoprecipitate transfusion

Cryoprecipitate transfusion data from 3 articles were included in the analyses of this section (23, 24, 29). Results of this section show no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.654). Figure 4 shows that in the DAPT group the amount of Cryoprecipitate transfusion after CABG did not change compared to the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.58).

Total blood product transfusion

Total blood product transfusion data from 4 articles (1 article containing two sets of data) were included in the analyses of this section (5, 24, 29, 31). Results of this section show heterogeneity (I2 = 54.8%; p = 0.065). Figure 4 shows that in the DAPT group, the amount of total blood product transfusion after CABG is 2.8 times higher than in the non-antiplatelet therapy group (OR = 2.82; 95% CI: 1.91 to 4.15).

Comparison of DAPT versus Aspirin therapy alone until surgery

Mortality

Mortality data from 2 articles were included in the analyses of this section (19, 20). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.795). Figure 5 shows that in the DAPT group, mortality after CABG is 1.6 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 0.86 to 3.06).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Forest plots for comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin therapy alone until surgery on postoperative mortality and reoperation in CABG patients. There is no evidence of publication bias. In cryoprecipitate transfusion, there are not enough studies. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio

Reoperation

Reoperation data from 4 articles (1 article containing two sets of data) were included in the analyses of this section (5, 6, 19, 20). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p <0.833). Figure 5 shows that in the DAPT group, reoperation after CABG is 2 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.94).

Chest tube drainage

Chest tube drainage data from 7 articles were included in the analyses of this section (5, 6, 19, 20, 23, 27, 28). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 77.1%; p <0.0001). Figure 6 shows that in the DAPT group, Chest tube drainage after CABG is 1.6 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.23).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Forest plots for comparison of dual antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin therapy alone until surgery on postoperative chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion in CABG patients. There is no evidence of publication bias. In cryoprecipitate transfusion, there are not enough studies. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; RBC: Red blood cell; FFP: Fresh frozen plasma

RBC transfusion

RBC transfusion data from 5 articles were included in the analyses of this section (5, 20, 23, 28, 29). Results of this section show no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.987). Figure 6 shows that in the DAPT group, RBC transfusion after CABG is 1.5 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.83).

Platelet transfusion

Platelet transfusion data from 5 articles were analyzed in this section (5, 6, 20, 23, 29). Results of this section show heterogeneity (I2 = 52.8%; p = 0.076). Figure 6 shows that in the DAPT group, platelet transfusion after CABG is 3.8 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.75 to 5.24).

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion data from 6 articles were included in the analyses of this section (5, 6, 20, 23, 28, 29). Results of this section indicate heterogeneity (I2 = 82.3%; p = 0.000). Figure 6 shows that in the DAPT group, the amount of fresh frozen plasma transfusion after CABG was 2 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.18 to 3.26).

Total blood product transfusion

Total blood product transfusion data from 4 articles (1 article containing two sets of data) were analyzed in this section (5, 6, 28, 29). Results of this section show heterogeneity (I2 = 31.6%; p = 0.211). Figure 6 shows that in the DAPT group, total blood product transfusion after CABG was 2.3 times higher than that of the Aspirin therapy alone group (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.80 to 3.00).

Discussion

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to answer the question that should DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel or be discontinued before CABG in patients with ACS or not? To answer this question, in this systematic review, rate of mortality, MI, CVA, reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events (atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, and heart failure), renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage, and blood product transfusion (RBC, Platelets, FFP, Cryoprecipitate and total blood products) were assessed after CABG. Findings showed that DAPT before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events, but increases the reoperation rate, need for re-exploration, length of ICU and length of hospital stay. Chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate in the DAPT group had significantly increased compared to the control group (non-antiplatelet or Aspirin alone). Increased chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate is the result of an increased risk of bleeding following antiplatelet therapy. Bleeding also increases the need for reoperation, re-exploration, and subsequently prolongs the length of ICU and hospital stay.

There was only one study on the assessment of atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, and heart failure following DAPT in patients with ACS; therefore, it was not possible to analyze them conclusively. Finally, all of them were reported as other cardiac events.

Since DAPT significantly increased the rate of chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion compared to both control groups (without APT and Aspirin alone), it seems that the effect of clopidogrel on bleeding and blood transfusion is prominent. In a systematic review and meta-analysis published by Cao et al., in 2014, the question was raised whether clopidogrel should be discontinued before CABG surgery? In their study, 2632 patients with ACS were studied, 1759 of them had discontinued clopidogrel less than 5 days before CABG, and 873 of them had discontinued clopidogrel more than 5 days before CABG. After comparing the results of these two groups, Cao et al. reported that patients who discontinued clopidogrel more than 5 days before CABG had significantly less major bleeding incidents (33). A systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Nijjer et al., in 2011, sought to answer the question whether clopidogrel consumption until CABG day is safe for patients with ACS? The findings of their study suggest that APT up to CABG day increases chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion (RBC, Platelets, and FFP) (34). The findings of our study are also in agreement with the results of the study by Nijjer et al. In their study, they pointed to the prominent role of heterogeneity in interpreting findings. They stated that despite increases in chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion, there was high heterogeneity in these outcomes (I2 is between 94 and 99%). Therefore, to find the origin of this heterogeneity, they divided the studies into three categories according to the year of surgery, 1999-2002, 2003-2006 and 2007 onwards. By analyzing these three groups, they found that recently published studies (2007 onwards) indicate that blood product transfusion and chest tube drainage are not different between the APT and non-APT groups, and this has been related to the development of surgical skill and technique in recent years. They eventually stated that the existence of such high heterogeneity is a serious obstacle to a definitive conclusion. In our study, moderate heterogeneity is presented in the results, which is lower than that of Nijjer et al. study. Also, there is no heterogeneity in FFP transfusion, cryoprecipitate transfusion, RBC transfusion, and total blood product transfusion results. Therefore, our results are more reliable. Another point that Nijjer and colleagues noted, was the lack of blinding in studies, that could influence surgery and its outcomes. In our study, the quality control of the studies indicated that blinding had not been applied, which can affect the conclusion.

Limitation

In the present meta-analysis, when comparing the DAPT group with the control group, using aspirin alone (not any anticoagulants), the number of articles was so small that only two outcomes of mortality and reoperation could be statistically assessed. There were two articles about mortality, so although the results of the meta-analysis show that the chances of mortality have not increased (compared to when the control group includes aspirin alone), the conclusion should be made with caution. The present study included 15 articles, only 4 of which were clinical trials and 11 were cohort studies. Since the level of evidence presented in cohort studies is lower than clinical trials, the level of evidence presented in the present study is moderate. In addition, only two studies had reported major bleeding, thus it was not possible to present results in this regard. Another limitation of the present study is the lack of blinding in most studies, indicating the presence of probable observer bias in the studies.

Conclusion

Our findings show that although DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events, given the significant increase in chest tube drainage, blood product transfusion, reoperation, re-exploration, and ICU and hospital stay, it is concluded that DAPT should be discontinued. However, most of the included studies were retrospective/prospective cohorts and further clinical trials are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.

Acknowledgments

Hereby, the authors would like to express their gratitude to the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Author contributions

All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. RS, AS, and MB were involved in the conception and design of the study. All authors were involved in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RS, MB, AB, and AS drafted the manuscript. RS, MB, NK, and AS statistically analyzed the study. All authors approved the final and submitted version.

Funding

No fund was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest

References

  • 1.Bertrand ME. When and how to discontinue antiplatelet therapy. European heart journal supplements. 2008;10(suppl_A):A35–A41. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, López-Sendón JL, Montalescot G, Theroux P, et al. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCI-CLARITY study. Jama. 2005;294(10):1224–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen Z. COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1607–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gerschutz GP, Bhatt DL. The Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) study: to what extent should the results be generalizable? American heart journal. 2003;145(4):595–601. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kremke M, Tang M, Bak M, Kristensen KL, Hindsholm K, Andreasen JJ, et al. Antiplatelet therapy at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicentre cohort study. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2013;44(2):e133–e40. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Straus S, Haxhibeqiri-Karabdic I, Grabovica SG, Granov N. A difference in bleeding and use of blood and blood products in patients who were preoperatively on aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy before coronary artery bypass grafting. Medical Archives. 2018;72(1):31. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.31-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, Zhao F, Lakkis N, Gersh BJ, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1202–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140675.85342.1B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chu MW, Wilson SR, Novick RJ, Stitt LW, Quantz MA. Does clopidogrel increase blood loss following coronary artery bypass surgery? The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2004;78(5):1536–41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berger JS, Frye CB, Harshaw Q, Edwards FH, Steinhubl SR, Becker RC. Impact of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes requiring coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52(21):1693–701. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Herman CR, Buth KJ, Kent BA, Hirsch GM. Clopidogrel increases blood transfusion and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2010;89(2):397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ebrahimi R, Dyke C, Mehran R, Manoukian SV, Feit F, Cox DA, et al. Outcomes following pre-operative clopidogrel administration in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53(21):1965–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dunning J, Versteegh M, Fabbri A, Pavie A, Kolh P, Lockowandt U, et al. Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2008;34(1):73–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Saha SP, Hessel II EA, Haan CK, Royston BD, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2007;83(5):S27–S86. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fitchett D, Eikelboom J, Fremes S, Mazer D, Singh S, Bittira B, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients requiring urgent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a position statement of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2009;25(12):683–9. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70527-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sistrom CL, Mergo PJ. A simple method for obtaining original data from published graphs and plots. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;174(5):1241–4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M. 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2009;34(18):1929–41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.National Heart L, Institute B. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Bethesda. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. pp. 103–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blasco-Colmenares E, Perl TM, Guallar E, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV, Alejo D, et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel and risk of infection after coronary artery bypass surgery. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009;169(8):788–95. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gielen CL, Bruggemans EF, Stijnen T, Eikenboom J, Tavilla G, Brand A, et al. Stopping antiplatelet medication before coronary artery bypass graft surgery: is there an optimal timing to minimize bleeding? European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2015;48(4):e64–e70. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Heidari A, Dezfouli FG, Tabatabi K, Mali S, Ahang R, Latifi SM, et al. Combined clopidogrel and aspirin treatment up to surgery dosen’t increase the risk of postoperative blood loss and reoperation for bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Pharmaceut Res Allied Sci. 2016;5:164–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hekmat K, Menzel C, Kroener A, Schwinger R, Kampe S, Fischer U, et al. The effect of preoperative antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery surgery: blood transfusion requirements for patients on cardiopulmonary bypass. Current medical research and opinion. 2004;20(9):1429–35. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hongo RH, Ley J, Dick SE, Yee RR. The effect of clopidogrel incombination with aspirin whengiven before coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40(2):231–7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01954-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hoxha A, Shehu S, Deveja R, Qirjazi T. Impact of Clopidogrel Loading for Coronarography on Bleeding After Urgent First Time CABG. Medical Archives. 2018;72(5):319. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.319-324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leiva-Pons J, Carrillo-Calvillo J, Leiva-Garza J, Loyo-Olivo M, Piña-Ramírez B, López-Quijano J, et al. Importance of the time for stopping the combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass graft surgery. Archivos de cardiología de México. 2008;78(2):178–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miceli A, Duggan SM, Aresu G, de Siena PM, Romeo F, Glauber M, et al. Combined clopidogrel and aspirin treatment up to surgery increases the risk of postoperative myocardial infarction, blood loss and reoperation for bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013;43(4):722–8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ouattara A, Bouzguenda H, Le Manach Y, Léger P, Mercadier A, Leprince P, et al. Impact of aspirin with or without clopidogrel on postoperative bleeding and blood transfusion in coronary surgical patients treated prophylactically with a low-dose of aprotinin. European heart journal. 2007;28(8):1025–32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Plicner D, Mazur P, Hymczak H, Stoliński J, Litwinowicz R, Drwiła R, et al. Preoperative platelet aggregation predicts perioperative blood loss and rethoracotomy for bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment prior to coronary surgery. Thrombosis research. 2015;136(3):519–25. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ray JG, Deniz S, Olivieri A, Pollex E, Vermeulen MJ, Alexander KS, et al. Increased blood product use among coronary artery bypass patients prescribed preoperative aspirin and clopidogrel. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2003;3(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-3-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Von Heymann C, Redlich U, Moritz M, Sander M, Hein OV, Grubitzsch H, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel taken until 2 days prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with increased postoperative drainage loss. The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon. 2005;53(06):341–5. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhu P, Chen Y, Wang H, Song B. Preoperative antiplatelet drugs on the hemorrhage and allogenic blood transfusion condition after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2018;31(6 (Special)):2819–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leiva-Pons J, Carrillo-Calvillo J, Leiva-Garza J, Loyo-Olivo M, Piña-Ramírez B, López-Quijano J, et al. Importance of the time for stopping the combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass graft surgery. Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico. 2008;78(2):178–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cao C, Indraratna P, Ang SC, Manganas C, Park J, Bannon PG, et al. Should clopidogrel be discontinued before coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014;148(6):3092–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nijjer SS, Watson G, Athanasiou T, Malik IS. Safety of clopidogrel being continued until the time of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of 34 studies. European heart journal. 2011;32(23):2970–88. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES