Abstract
Altered brain development has been highlighted as an important contributor to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease. Abnormalities begin prenatally and include micro- and macrostructural disturbances that contribute to an altered trajectory of brain growth throughout gestation. Recent progress in fetal imaging has improved understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms and risk factors for impaired fetal brain development. The impact of the prenatal environment on postnatal neurological care has also gained increased focus. This review summarizes current data on the timing and pattern of altered brain development in congenital heart disease, the potential mechanisms of these abnormalities, and the association with perioperative neurological complications.
Keywords: congenital heart disease, brain, brain development, brain injury, fetal, prenatal
Why Focus on the Prenatal Period?
Over the past several decades, advancements in surgical and cardiac intensive care have improved survival for infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). As a result, there are now a greater number of adults than children living with this diagnosis.1 This has shifted clinical and research efforts to reducing the associated morbidities of CHD. Neurodevelopmental impairment is increasingly recognized as the most common morbidity and spans deficits in motor function, cognition, language, executive function, visual-spatial skills, and behavioral and psychosocial outcomes.2-4 By adolescence, 65% of children with CHD will receive remedial services and 50% will receive psychotherapy or counseling.2 Impairments in cognitive and psychosocial functioning continue in adulthood and affect educational achievement, quality of life, employment, and insurance acquisition.5-7 The growing population of CHD survivors and the significant long-term neurodevelopmental consequences of this diagnosis pose an urgent need to develop neuroprotective strategies. Many of the initial neurologically focused studies centered on perioperative mechanisms of neurodevelopmental impairment as potential targets. However, postnatal medical, surgical, and socioeconomic factors only explain 30% of the variance in developmental outcome.8 Thus, the prenatal environment likely plays an important role.
A growing number of brain imaging studies have contributed to our understanding of the underlying neurological abnormalities that lead to neurodevelopmental impairments in CHD. While brain injury is common, altered brain development has been highlighted as a key component of the long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae these children face.9-11 Importantly, the presence of abnormal preoperative brain development suggests in utero disturbances.12-16 The seminal work of Limperopoulos and colleagues applied fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods to the CHD population and confirmed the existence of intrauterine abnormalities.17 Increasing focus on the prenatal environment has laid the foundation for current understanding of the pattern and underlying mechanisms of altered brain development in CHD and its implications for perioperative neurocritical care. These data are summarized throughout this review and are schematically displayed in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prenatal Brain Development in Congenital Heart Disease. This schematic represents the pattern of abnormal brain development in the CHD fetus by highlighting the primary macrostructural and microstructural abnormalities that have been identified on fetal brain imaging. The left panel summaries potential mechanisms that have been proposed for disrupted prenatal brain development. The right panel summarizes perioperative neurological abnormalities for which altered prenatal brain development increases risk (top) and prenatal factors that appear to be neuroprotective for the developing CHD brain (bottom).
Prenatal Disruption of Brain Development in CHD
Timing and Trajectory of Altered Brain Growth
The exact timing by which typical brain development is disrupted in CHD fetuses has not been fully elucidated, but ultrasonography and MRI studies have begun to provide insights. Brain growth has been investigated in multiple CHD cohorts using ultrasound measures of biparietal diameter and head circumference via absolute values, z-scores, or in relation to weight. While not all studies support a CHD-related vulnerability, the vast majority show second and third trimester reductions in fetal brain size.18-25 A recent population-based study of over 57,000 pregnancies, including 295 with fetal isolated CHD, identified that abnormal brain growth begins in mid-gestation. Biparietal diameter z-scores were similar between groups at 12 weeks gestation, but head circumference z-scores were reduced in CHD fetuses at 20 weeks (z-score difference of −0.13). Even greater reductions were present at birth (z-score difference of −0.22).25 Analyses of growth rates have shown slower second to third trimester biparietal diameter and head circumference growth in the CHD population.24
Fetal MRI studies also demonstrate altered brain growth. Reduced total brain volume (TBV) is reported by 25 weeks gestation.26 Third trimester deficits are consistently demonstrated across studies and display progressive worsening in growth over pregnancy.17,26-28 A study of longitudinal prenatal and postnatal MRI showed a slower rate of growth that led to reductions by early preoperative imaging, supporting progressive third trimester impairments.29 A small cohort comparing fetuses with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) to controls who underwent 3-5 fetal MRIs identified TGA fetuses to have a smaller brain/body ratio at 24 weeks and reduced TBV at 26 weeks that persisted throughout pregnancy.30 Thus, ultrasound and MRI data demonstrate impaired brain growth by the second trimester that progresses at a slower rate of growth throughout gestation.
Tissues and Structures Affected
Early preoperative, neonatal MRI reflects the overall effects of the prenatal environment on brain development for CHD infants. Delayed myelination patterns, impaired white matter microstructural development, abnormal brain metabolism, reductions in regional brain size and volume, and abnormal cerebral cortical folding and development are all present preoperatively.12-16 These findings suggest global white and gray matter disturbances are occurring in the CHD fetus. With advances in fetal MRI techniques, similar detailed assessments as those performed on neonatal MRI are now becoming feasible prenatally.
Specific to the developing white matter, CHD fetuses display macrostructural (via volumetric analysis) and microstructural (via diffusion tensor imaging) abnormalities.26,31,32 In a cohort of HLHS fetuses, reductions in white matter volume began at 30 weeks gestation.31 Subcortical volume, which includes the developing white matter, is reduced at 25 weeks for Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF).26 A cohort of heterogeneous cardiac diagnoses who underwent diffusion tensor imaging at 26-30 weeks demonstrated decreased fractional anisotropy in the corpus callosum.32 This represents atypical microstructural development of this major white matter tract.
Gray matter development is also disrupted prenatally in CHD fetuses. For HLHS, the white matter deficits described above occur alongside volumetric reductions in the cerebral cortex and subcortical gray matter, although subcortical structures are less affected.31 Despite this, a case series of three fetuses with CHD who underwent diffusion tensor imaging at 32-35 weeks showed altered microstructure in the thalamus.33 Reductions in cerebellar volume have also been identified.34 Cortical involvement is present by 25 weeks gestation and includes abnormalities in cortical folding and sulcation.31,35 In HLHS fetuses, there is a three-week delay in the emergence of the cingulate sulcus, superior frontal sulcus, and anterior ascendant ramus.31 Left hemispheric sulcal pattern differences are present in the Sylvian Fissure and early emerging sulci in CHD fetuses imaged at 21-30 weeks gestation.35 These alterations are primarily due to differences in the position of corresponding sulcal basins, which reflects the positional relationship between the deepest parts of neighboring cerebral sulci.35
Studies investigating the trajectory of tissue-specific alterations and their contributions to overall brain growth are limited. Fetuses with TOF have a declining ratio of gray matter to subcortical volume over gestation.26 This supports a proportionately slower rate of cortical growth. Two other cohorts have identified the cerebral cortex, subcortical gray matter, and cerebellum as primary contributors to the altered growth trajectory seen in CHD fetuses.28,29 The constellation of findings on fetal MRI studies support global white and gray matter disturbances at the micro- and macro-structural level in the late second and early third trimester that progress along an altered trajectory of brain growth. Deficits in gray matter structures may provide the greatest contributions to this altered trajectory over time.
Diagnoses at Highest Risk
In the recent population-based study from Lauridsen and colleagues, fetuses with single ventricle physiology and TOF had the greatest reductions in head circumference prenatally.25 Whereas infants with TGA have the smallest head size relative to total body size at birth.36 Reduced TBV has been shown to be most severe for fetuses with single ventricle physiology, specifically HLHS in one cohort of patients.17,28 However, biventricular CHD, and particularly TOF, had the greatest reductions in another study.27 The heterogeneity in cardiac diagnoses and large variations in anatomy and physiology, even within specific lesions, make it difficult to determine exact diagnosis-specific risk. However, moderate-severe lesions such as HLHS, TGA, and TOF are consistently affected.
CHD-Related Hypoxia as a Mechanism of Altered Prenatal Brain Development
Fetal Physiologic Response to Hypoxia
Fetuses rely on delivery of oxygen and nutrient-rich blood from the placenta. The oxygenated blood is preferentially shunted through the foramen ovale to the left side of the heart, out the aorta, and to the fetal brain (Figure 2A).37,38 Many forms of CHD alter cardiac anatomy in such a way that disrupts this normal physiology. For example, in TGA, the aorta and pulmonary artery are transposed and blood supply to the fetal brain comes from the deoxygenated right side of the heart (Figure 2B).37,38 In fetuses with HLHS, hypoplasia of left-sided structures facilitate mixing of oxygenated and deoxygenated blood in the right atrium. In the most severe cases, the relatively deoxygenated right-sided blood is supplied to the developing brain retrograde through the aortic isthmus (Figure 2C).37,38 These examples highlight two ways in which distinct cardiac physiologies may contribute to fetal cerebral hypoxia. Although, other diagnoses also disrupt normal fetal physiology.
Figure 2.
Fetal Cardiac Physiology. Normal fetal circulation and changes with congenital heart disease course of blood flow in a late gestation fetus with normal heart anatomy (A), d-transposition of the great arteries (B) and hypoplastic left heart syndrome due to aortic atresia (C). Deoxygenated blood (blue-purple) flows to the placenta through the umbilical artery (UA) where gas exchange takes place. Blood with higher oxygen content (red) returns through the umbilical vein (UV) and ductus venosus (DV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC). The more highly saturated blood forms a stream in the IVC, which is preferentially directed across the foramen ovale into the left ventricle in the normal fetus and with d-TGA. Estimated hemoglobin oxygen saturation in percent is shown for each ventricle. Blood flow to the fetal lungs is limited by elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. In the fetus with d-TGA, the aorta arises from the right ventricle such that the brain receives less oxygenated blood, while the higher saturated blood is directed to the descending aorta through the ductus arteriosus. In HLHS, reduced or absent left ventricular ejection results in elevated left atrial pressure, limiting or reversing flow at the foramen and resulting in complete mixing of desaturated and well saturated blood in the right atrium and ventricle. Blood flow to the head and neck may occur in a retrograde fashion from the ductus arteriosus across the aortic isthmus. (Reprinted from Prog Pediatr Cardiol; 29(2), McQuillen et al, Effects of congenital heart disease on brain development, 79-85, 2010, with permission from Elsevier)
The fetal response to hypoxia appears to vary depending on gestational age and whether the exposure is acute or chronic. In acute hypoxia, cerebral vasodilation permits increased oxygen delivery to the developing brain, known as the “brain sparing effect.”39 However, this response is insufficient for oxygen consumption early in gestation.40 Furthermore, with chronic fetal hypoxia, as occurs with CHD, middle cerebral artery vasodilation is attenuated and decreased cerebral oxygen consumption occurs.39 Initial studies investigating CHD-related hypoxia measured cerebrovascular resistance from ultrasonography as a surrogate marker of compensatory cerebral vasodilation. These data identified alterations in a variety of diagnoses, but differing effects were present depending on the study.23,41-43 The most consistent alteration was decreased resistance for HLHS fetuses.41-43 These cohort variations may reflect differences in severity and longevity of hypoxia, depending on gestational age at measurement and diagnoses included. Factors beyond oxygenation may also play a role, since it is known in adults that pCO2 is a potent stimulator of cerebral blood flow.44
Recent advances in fetal MRI now permit more direct measurement of tissue oxygenation to delineate the effects of CHD-related hypoxia on the developing brain. Application of these methods to CHD demonstrate reduced cerebral oxygenation in the third trimester.27,45 The rate of change in oxygenation between 32 and 37 weeks gestation does not differ for CHD and control fetuses despite reductions at both time points.45 MRI hemodynamic parameters at 36 weeks gestation have identified reduced fetal oxygen delivery, ascending aortic saturation, and fetal and cerebral oxygen consumption. The reduction in cerebral oxygen consumption is associated with lower brain weight by a full standard deviation.27 In this same cohort, similar superior vena cava flow was present in CHD and control fetuses, which could suggest a more chronic hypoxic state where brain-sparing physiology is no longer present but hypoxia still contributes to altered brain development.27
Hypoxia-Related Cellular Mechanisms of Altered Brain Development
Based on preterm data, the primary cellular mechanism for hypoxia-related disruption of brain development is thought to be injury to premyelinating oligodendrocytes (Pre-OLs).46,47 Direct effects on developing white matter axons, subplate neurons, and migratory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic neurons can also occur.46,47 Pre-OLs originate from radial glial cells in the subventricular zone and differentiate to form mature oligodendrocytes, which are responsible for myelination of developing white matter axons.47 Pre-OLs are highly prevalent in the developing brain at 23-32 weeks gestation and are particularly vulnerable to hypoxia-ischemia.48,49 Pre-OL injury occurs via excitotoxicity, free radical production, and microglial activation. This most commonly leads to a loss of cell processes as opposed to apoptosis.47 Precursor cells are then upregulated but an arrested maturation occurs that prevents differentiation to mature myelin-producing cells and results in hypomyelination.50-52 Axonal/neuronal involvement contributes to abnormalities in the cerebral cortex and subcortical gray matter structures via impaired thalamocortical connectivity (from hypomyelination) or via direct hypoxic effects.53-56
Neuropathology data in fetuses and infants with CHD demonstrate evidence of white matter, cortical gray matter, and subcortical gray matter injury as early as 19-22 weeks gestation.57,58 A recent model of intrauterine chronic hypoxia, similar to the severity of hypoxia in TGA, identified reduced neuronal density in the cerebral white matter, impaired myelination, reduced cortical and cerebellar weight, and cortical folding abnormalities.59 Given the existence of cortical abnormalities, the subventricular zone, which is the primary postnatal contributor to cortical neurons,60 has become a focus in CHD. A neonatal porcine model of chronic hypoxia identified reduced cortical gray matter volume and gyrification to coincide with fewer neuroprogenitor cells and decreased neurogenesis in the subventricular zone.61 Brain specimens from human infants with CHD demonstrated similar subventricular and cortical involvement.61 These data all suggest a complex interplay of white matter and axonal/neuronal disturbances that result in the global abnormalities seen on fetal MRI in CHD.
Decreased glucose supply has been proposed as the mechanism behind hypoxic effects on the developing brain.38 The fetal brain accounts for one-third of total body glucose consumption during the second trimester of pregnancy.62 Glucose is the energy substrate for the brain and, in the setting of hypoxia, is metabolized through the tricarboxylic acid cycle to pyruvate and ultimately lactate.38 Interestingly, altered brain metabolism, including elevated lactate, has been reported in CHD fetuses.17 Exposing fetal sheep to intrauterine chronic hypoxia while providing similar glucose and nutrient delivery as non-hypoxic animals does still render the white matter and cortical deficits described above.59 However, chronic hypoxia could still decrease brain glucose supply via conversion to anaerobic metabolism even with adequate nutrient delivery from the placenta. Recently, it has been hypothesized that the fetal brain relies on aerobic glycolysis for typical brain development.62 This may provide further support for the important role of glucose. Abnormal placental functioning may also affect nutrient and oxygen delivery in the CHD fetus.
The Role of the Placenta
The placenta is essential for oxygen and nutrient exchange in the fetus and for health and development over the lifespan.63 Preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth are associated with placental abnormalities.64,65 These factors are also more common with CHD and are linked with longer hospital length of stay and decreased 3-year survival in the cardiac population.66-69 Reduced placental weight occurs across multiple cardiac defects and correlates with lower birth head circumference.36,70 A recent publication of 120 pregnancies with fetal CHD showed increased chorioangiosis, vascular hyperplasia in terminal chorionic villi, and villus hypomaturity of the placenta.70 A small cohort of HLHS pregnancies has shown abnormal development of placental villi, alongside reduced vascular area and density and dysregulation of leptin, an angiogenic factor.71 Placental vascular malperfusion includes several patterns of vascular abnormalities that can result from obstruction in fetal blood flow or hypoxia and is also seen with CHD.65,72,73 Placental MRI has identified reduced umbilical vein oxygenation and altered placental perfusion in CHD fetuses.27,74 These data support altered placental functioning in addition to the disrupted vascular development that has been reported. Recently, placental abnormalities have been associated with more severe brain injury postnatally.75 Thus, abnormal placental development and function may play an important role in CHD-associated neurological abnormalities.
Genetic and Epigenetic Considerations
It is well known that syndromic patients with CHD and those with extra-cardiac anomalies are at greater risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.76-78 Rapid advances in sequencing technologies are now beginning to reveal the extent to which genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to neurodevelopment. For example, copy number variants appear to play an important pathogenic role for CHD and include variants in genes associated with neuronal development.79 Furthermore, pathogenic copy number variants correlate with impaired motor development at 14 months of age.80 The apolipoprotein E ε2 allele has also been associated with impaired motor development, as well as behavioral problems.81,82 Additionally, de novo damaging mutations in genes highly expressed in the heart and brain have been identified in CHD patients with neurodevelopmental disability.83 These data support a genetic contribution to altered brain development in CHD.
Disruption of epigenetic regulation may alter transcription factor binding and expression of genes critical for both cardiac and brain development.84,85 Hypoxia-related altered gene expression in angiogenic pathways may also be important. Hypoxia inducible factors 1- and 2-alpha (HIF-1/2α) regulate adaptation to hypoxia by activating gene transcription.86 Under hypoxic conditions, HIF suppresses maturation of oligodendroglia and increases vascular density via the WNT signaling pathway.87 Impaired maturation of oligodendroglia results in hypomyelination, as described above. Intrauterine chronic hypoxia increases capillary density in the cerebral white matter and correlates with impaired myelination.59 Thus, this is a plausible pathway by which brain development may be altered in CHD. Specific to CHD fetuses, HIF-2α expression has been shown to be increased in the basal ganglia.88 Expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A, both angiogenic factors, are also altered.88 Damaging angiogenic variants identified by whole exome sequencing have recently been associated with smaller birth head circumference and increased umbilical artery pulsatility index z-scores (suggesting placental insufficiency).89 These findings support a common pathway by which angiogenic variants result from and/or cause abnormal heart, brain, and placental development.
Despite growing evidence linking genetic variants to neurodevelopmental outcome, minimal data have studied their association with the micro- and macrostructural brain abnormalities that occur on fetal MRI in CHD. Sulcal pattern analysis has identified alterations in the earliest emerging sulci,35 which are thought to be under tighter genetic control than later emerging sulci.90 Whole exome sequencing in adolescents with CHD have identified that damaging de novo variants were only present in patients with the most atypical sulcal patterns.91 Additional studies are needed to determine the effects of genetic and epigenetic factors on the timing, trajectory, and region/structure-specific alterations in brain development that occur in CHD.
Impact of Prenatal Brain Development on Perioperative Neurological Risk
Association of Prenatal Brain Development with Perioperative Brain Injury
Postnatal MRI studies have utilized a brain maturational scoring system in infants with CHD and have identified an association between preoperative brain immaturity and increased risk of white matter injury.9,92 Impaired white matter microstructure and brain metabolism have also been associated with perioperative white matter injury and stroke.93 Fetal MRI data are now beginning to further define these associations. Qualitative findings of altered fetal brain development, such as increased extra-axial spaces and ventricular dilatation, increase the risk of preoperative white matter injury.94 A recent cohort of CHD fetuses who underwent fetal volumetric analysis discovered prenatal reductions in total brain, cortical gray matter, unmyelinated white matter, and cerebellar volume to correlate with neonatal ischemic brain injury. Increased cerebrospinal fluid volume had a similar effect.95
Animal models have identified a plausible cellular mechanism by which abnormal brain development leads to brain injury. As described above, injury to Pre-OLs results in upregulation of progenitors that are unable to form mature oligodendrocytes, leading to a preponderance of Pre-OLs.50-52 Persistent Pre-OLs in chronic white matter lesions demonstrate increased susceptibility to injury from repeated hypoxic-ischemic exposure.52 In the clinical setting, cardiac diagnoses that result in intrauterine hypoxia typically display postnatal hypoxia and require surgical interventions with cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. A preclinical model mimicking the ischemia-reperfusion/reoxygenation of cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest has shown a vulnerability of Pre-OLs.96 An upregulation of precursors cells and downstream hypomyelination results.96 These findings are similar to the cellular mechanisms proposed for prenatal hypoxic brain alterations. Furthermore, hypoxia prior to ischemia-reperfusion/reoxygenation leads to additional susceptibility of Pre-OLs.97 Therefore, CHD-related fetal hypoxia may render the developing brain more vulnerable during cardiac surgery, particularly if altered brain development pre-exists. Of interest, mature oligodendrocytes are also susceptible during ischemia-reperfusion/reoxygenation when exposed to prior hypoxia.97 However, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest mitigates this risk, suggesting this surgical strategy could be somewhat neuroprotective.97
Prenatal Brain Development and Infant Electroencephalography
In addition to brain injury, CHD infants often display abnormal background pattern on electroencephalography (EEG) perioperatively, and 8-30% have evidence of electrographic seizures.98-102 In a small cohort of heterogeneous cardiac diagnoses, nearly 60% of infants demonstrated an abnormal EEG on the first day of life.103 Furthermore, infants with brain atrophy on preoperative MRI, which would be reflective of global disturbances in brain development, were more likely to have severely abnormal EEG background pattern and were unlikely to have sleep-wake cycling.103 Subsequent data found no association of brain maturation or microstructural development with EEG background activity, although infants with brain injury were more likely to have a discontinuous pattern.104 While the data are not conclusive, it is possible that EEG abnormalities in CHD infants result from altered prenatal brain development, postnatal brain injury secondary to impaired development, or a combination of both.
Prenatal Diagnosis, Brain Injury, and Postnatal Brain Development
In the modern era of fetal cardiology, prenatal diagnosis is becoming more common and appears to have a neuroprotective effect. For example, Mahle and colleagues have shown that infants with HLHS who were prenatally diagnosed were less likely to have seizures or a comatose state than those diagnosed after birth.105 Prenatally diagnosed single ventricle and TGA infants demonstrate less preoperative brain injury and less severe lesions if injury is present.106 Postnatally diagnosed infants are more likely to have metabolic acidosis and higher lactate levels before cardiac surgery.105,107 This hypoperfusion state has been proposed as a mechanism for increased neurological risk in infants who are not diagnosed until after birth. However, surgery often occurs at a later age in patients with a postnatal diagnosis.105,106,108 Longer time to surgery has been associated with increased risk of postoperative white matter injury due to lower cerebral oxygen saturations.109 Thus, the timing of cardiac surgery in postnatally diagnosed CHD infants may also impact risk of brain injury110 and could be a potentially modifiable factor.
Prenatal diagnosis has also been associated with more optimal brain development in the perioperative period. Specifically, prenatally diagnosed infants with single ventricle physiology and TGA display a faster rate of pre- to post-operative microstructural brain development in white and gray matter brain regions.106 The neuroprotective effects of a prenatal diagnosis also extend beyond the perioperative period. Children with a prenatal diagnosis of TGA display better neurocognitive outcomes at 4-6 years of age than those postnatally diagnosed.111
While prenatal diagnosis plays an important role in decreasing perioperative and long-term neurological risk (potentially via delivery planning and optimization of immediate postnatal critical care112), there may be some detrimental effects because of the parental psychological distress coincident with the diagnosis. Parental wellbeing is becoming an area of increased focus in the CHD literature. Parents show elevated depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms after receiving a prenatal diagnosis of CHD.113,114 Prenatal stress exposure is just beginning to be studied for its effects on fetal brain development. Term infant data have shown an association of stress exposure with abnormal development of the amygdala and hippocampus.115 As knowledge of parental psychological wellbeing and its impact on brain development increases, it will be important to evaluate this fetal exposure in the CHD population.
Timing of Delivery is Important for the CHD Brain
Once a prenatal diagnosis is established in a fetus with CHD, timing of delivery becomes an essential component of clinical care. Gestational age at birth is a well-known predictor of neurodevelopmental impairments in cognitive, language, motor, executive functioning, behavioral and psychiatric domains.116-118 This relationship is also seen with brain injury. Lower gestational age at birth has been associated with greater white matter injury volume119 and increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in CHD.120 Preterm infants in a cardiac intensive care unit are 3.2 times more likely to display acute neurological events that include intracranial hemorrhage or white matter injury.121 Early term birth also increases risk of brain injury in CHD. Infants born at 37-38 weeks gestation are 2.5 times more likely to have cerebrovascular injury.122 This risk continues to increase as gestational age decreases.122 MRI data also support an association between preterm birth and greater disruption of brain development for CHD infants. Diffusion tensor imaging shows microstructural abnormalities across multiple white matter tracts that appear to be driven by white matter injury.123 Compared to preterm infants without CHD and to critically ill term infants, preterm CHD infants display greater microstructural abnormalities in peripheral and deep white matter and in the thalamus.124 To reduce morbidity and mortality, including postnatal neurological risks, recent guidelines recommend that elective delivery should not occur before 39 weeks for CHD fetuses.112 Furthermore, an algorithm of delivery planning and resuscitation based on cardiac diagnosis/physiology has been provided to prevent postnatal hemodynamic compromise.112
Conclusions
Fetuses with CHD display alterations in brain development that span multiple tissues and regions within the developing brain. These deficits are present by the second trimester and progress along an altered trajectory of brain growth that predisposes the CHD infant to increased perioperative neurological risk. The underlying mechanisms of these alterations are likely multifactorial and include hypoxia, genetic and epigenetic variants, placental abnormalities, and prenatal stress exposure. Prenatal diagnosis and delivery at term gestation have neuroprotective effects for the developing CHD brain.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL141602), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U54 HD087011 to the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University, and the Children’s Discovery Institute of Washington University and St. Louis Children's Hospital. The content of this work is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Marelli AJ, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Guo L, Dendukuri N, Kaouache M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;130(9):749–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bellinger DC, Wypij D, Rivkin MJ, et al. Adolescents with d-transposition of the great arteries corrected with the arterial switch procedure: neuropsychological assessment and structural brain imaging. Circulation. 2011;124(12):1361–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Easson K, Dahan-Oliel N, Rohlicek C, et al. A Comparison of Developmental Outcomes of Adolescent Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Survivors Born with a Congenital Heart Defect or Born Preterm. J Pediatr-Us. 2019;207:34-+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goldberg CS, Lu M, Sleeper LA, et al. Factors associated with neurodevelopment for children with single ventricle lesions. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014;165(3):490–496 e498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(23):e143–e263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kasmi L, Calderon J, Montreuil M, et al. Neurocognitive and Psychological Outcomes in Adults With Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries Corrected by the Arterial Switch Operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(3):830–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gleason LP, Deng LX, Khan AM, et al. Psychological distress in adults with congenital heart disease: focus beyond depression. Cardiol Young. 2019;29(2):185–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gaynor JW, Wernovsky G, Jarvik GP, et al. Patient characteristics are important determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age after neonatal and infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1344–1353, 1353 e1341-1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Beca J, Gunn JK, Coleman L, et al. New white matter brain injury after infant heart surgery is associated with diagnostic group and the use of circulatory arrest. Circulation. 2013;127(9):971–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rollins CK, Watson CG, Asaro LA, et al. White matter microstructure and cognition in adolescents with congenital heart disease. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014;165(5):936–944 e931-932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.von Rhein M, Buchmann A, Hagmann C, et al. Brain volumes predict neurodevelopment in adolescents after surgery for congenital heart disease. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):268–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Licht DJ, Shera DM, Clancy RR, et al. Brain maturation is delayed in infants with complex congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(3):529–536; discussion 536-527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ortinau C, Inder T, Lambeth J, Wallendorf M, Finucane K, Beca J. Congenital heart disease affects cerebral size but not brain growth. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33(7):1138–1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Miller SP, McQuillen PS, Hamrick S, et al. Abnormal brain development in newborns with congenital heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1928–1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.von Rhein M, Buchmann A, Hagmann C, et al. Severe Congenital Heart Defects Are Associated with Global Reduction of Neonatal Brain Volumes. The Journal of pediatrics. 2015;167(6):1259–1263 e1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ortinau C, Alexopoulos D, Dierker D, Van Essen D, Beca J, Inder T. Cortical folding is altered before surgery in infants with congenital heart disease. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013;163(5):1507–1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Limperopoulos C, Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, et al. Brain volume and metabolism in fetuses with congenital heart disease: evaluation with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Circulation. 2010;121(1):26–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arduini M, Rosati P, Caforio L, et al. Cerebral blood flow autoregulation and congenital heart disease: possible causes of abnormal prenatal neurologic development. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(10):1208–1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Donofrio MT, Bremer YA, Schieken RM, et al. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in fetuses with congenital heart disease: the brain sparing effect. Pediatr Cardiol. 2003;24(5):436–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hangge PT, Cnota JF, Woo JG, et al. Microcephaly is associated with early adverse neurologic outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(1):61–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Inversetti A, Fesslova V, Deprest J, Candiani M, Giorgione V, Cavoretto P. Prenatal Growth in Fetuses with Isolated Cyanotic and Non-Cyanotic Congenital Heart Defects. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Itsukaichi M, Kikuchi A, Yoshihara K, Serikawa T, Takakuwa K, Tanaka K. Changes in fetal circulation associated with congenital heart disease and their effects on fetal growth. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30(3):219–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Masoller N, Martinez JM, Gomez O, et al. Evidence of second-trimester changes in head biometry and brain perfusion in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(2):182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Williams IA, Fifer WP, Andrews H. Fetal Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36(6):1135–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lauridsen MH, Uldbjerg N, Petersen OB, et al. Fetal Heart Defects and Measures of Cerebral Size. The Journal of pediatrics. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schellen C, Ernst S, Gruber GM, et al. Fetal MRI detects early alterations of brain development in Tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(3):392 e391–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sun L, Macgowan CK, Sled JG, et al. Reduced fetal cerebral oxygen consumption is associated with smaller brain size in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2015;131(15):1313–1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rajagopalan V, Votava-Smith JK, Zhuang X, et al. Fetuses with single ventricle congenital heart disease manifest impairment of regional brain growth. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(13):1042–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ortinau CM, Mangin-Heimos K, Moen J, et al. Prenatal to postnatal trajectory of brain growth in complex congenital heart disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:913–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jorgensen DES, Tabor A, Rode L, et al. Longitudinal Brain and Body Growth in Fetuses With and Without Transposition of the Great Arteries. Circulation. 2018;138(13):1368–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clouchoux C, du Plessis AJ, Bouyssi-Kobar M, et al. Delayed cortical development in fetuses with complex congenital heart disease. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23(12):2932–2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Khan S, Rollins C, Ortinau C, Afacan O, Warfield S, Gholipour A. Tract-Specific Group Analysis in Fetal Cohorts using in utero Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Vol 10.1007/978-3-030-00931-14. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berman JI, Hamrick SE, McQuillen PS, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(2):E21–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Olshaker H, Ber R, Hoffman D, Derazne E, Achiron R, Katorza E. Volumetric Brain MRI Study in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(6):1164–1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ortinau CM, Rollins CK, Gholipour A, et al. Early-Emerging Sulcal Patterns Are Atypical in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease. Cereb Cortex. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Matthiesen NB, Henriksen TB, Agergaard P, et al. Congenital Heart Defects and Indices of Placental and Fetal Growth in a Nationwide Study of 924 422 Liveborn Infants. Circulation. 2016;134(20):1546–1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McQuillen PS, Goff DA, Licht DJ. Effects of congenital heart disease on brain development. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;29(2):79–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rudolph AM. Impaired cerebral development in fetuses with congenital cardiovascular malformations: Is it the result of inadequate glucose supply? Pediatr Res. 2016;80(2):172–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pearce W Hypoxic regulation of the fetal cerebral circulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(2):731–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gleason CA, Hamm C, Jones MD Jr. Effect of acute hypoxemia on brain blood flow and oxygen metabolism in immature fetal sheep. Am J Physiol. 1990;258(4 Pt 2):H1064–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kaltman JR, Di H, Tian Z, Rychik J. Impact of congenital heart disease on cerebrovascular blood flow dynamics in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(1):32–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Berg C, Gembruch O, Gembruch U, Geipel A. Doppler indices of the middle cerebral artery in fetuses with cardiac defects theoretically associated with impaired cerebral oxygen delivery in utero: is there a brain-sparing effect? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(6):666–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Szwast A, Tian Z, McCann M, Soffer D, Rychik J. Comparative analysis of cerebrovascular resistance in fetuses with single-ventricle congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(1):62–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Blockley NP, Griffeth VE, Simon AB, Buxton RB. A review of calibrated blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) methods for the measurement of task-induced changes in brain oxygen metabolism. NMR Biomed. 2013;26(8):987–1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lauridsen MH, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB, et al. Cerebral Oxygenation Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fetuses With and Without Heart Defects. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(11):e006459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Volpe JJ. Brain injury in premature infants: a complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(1):110–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ortinau C, Neil J. The neuroanatomy of prematurity: normal brain development and the impact of preterm birth. Clin Anat. 2015;28(2):168–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Back SA, Han BH, Luo NL, et al. Selective vulnerability of late oligodendrocyte progenitors to hypoxia-ischemia. J Neurosci. 2002;22(2):455–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Back SA, Luo NL, Borenstein NS, Levine JM, Volpe JJ, Kinney HC. Late oligodendrocyte progenitors coincide with the developmental window of vulnerability for human perinatal white matter injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21(4):1302–1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Buser JR, Maire J, Riddle A, et al. Arrested preoligodendrocyte maturation contributes to myelination failure in premature infants. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(1):93–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Billiards SS, Haynes RL, Folkerth RD, et al. Myelin abnormalities without oligodendrocyte loss in periventricular leukomalacia. Brain Pathol. 2008;18(2):153–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Segovia KN, McClure M, Moravec M, et al. Arrested oligodendrocyte lineage maturation in chronic perinatal white matter injury. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(4):520–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Inder TE, Warfield SK, Wang H, Huppi PS, Volpe JJ. Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):286–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Haynes RL, Billiards SS, Borenstein NS, Volpe JJ, Kinney HC. Diffuse axonal injury in periventricular leukomalacia as determined by apoptotic marker fractin. Pediatr Res. 2008;63(6):656–661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ball G, Boardman JP, Rueckert D, et al. The effect of preterm birth on thalamic and cortical development. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(5):1016–1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kinney HC, Haynes RL, Xu G, et al. Neuron deficit in the white matter and subplate in periventricular leukomalacia. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(3):397–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hinton RB, Andelfinger G, Sekar P, et al. Prenatal head growth and white matter injury in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2008;64(4):364–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kinney HC, Panigrahy A, Newburger JW, Jonas RA, Sleeper LA. Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in infants with congenital heart disease dying after cardiac surgery. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110(6):563–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lawrence KM, McGovern PE, Mejaddam A, et al. Chronic intrauterine hypoxia alters neurodevelopment in fetal sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mizutani K, Yoon K, Dang L, Tokunaga A, Gaiano N. Differential Notch signalling distinguishes neural stem cells from intermediate progenitors. Nature. 2007;449(7160):351–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morton PD, Korotcova L, Lewis BK, et al. Abnormal neurogenesis and cortical growth in congenital heart disease. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(374). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Goyal MS, Iannotti LL, Raichle ME. Brain Nutrition: A Life Span Approach. Annu Rev Nutr. 2018;38:381–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Crispi F, Bijnens B, Figueras F, et al. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children. Circulation. 2010;121(22):2427–2436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ernst LM. Maternal vascular malperfusion of the placental bed. APMIS. 2018;126(7):551–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(7):698–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gaynor JW, Parry S, Moldenhauer JS, et al. The impact of the maternal-foetal environment on outcomes of surgery for congenital heart disease in neonates. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(2):348–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Auger N, Fraser WD, Healy-Profitos J, Arbour L. Association Between Preeclampsia and Congenital Heart Defects. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1588–1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Laas E, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, et al. Preterm birth and congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e829–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Malik S, Cleves MA, Zhao W, Correa A, Hobbs CA, National Birth Defects Prevention S. Association between congenital heart defects and small for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):e976–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rychik J, Goff D, McKay E, et al. Characterization of the Placenta in the Newborn with Congenital Heart Disease: Distinctions Based on Type of Cardiac Malformation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018;39(6):1165–1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jones HN, Olbrych SK, Smith KL, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome is associated with structural and vascular placental abnormalities and leptin dysregulation. Placenta. 2015;36(10):1078–1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Miremberg H, Gindes L, Schreiber L, Raucher Sternfeld A, Bar J, Kovo M. The association between severe fetal congenital heart defects and placental vascular malperfusion lesions. Prenat Diagn. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 73.Redline RW, Ravishankar S. Fetal vascular malperfusion, an update. APMIS. 2018;126(7):561–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zun Z, Zaharchuk G, Andescavage NN, Donofrio MT, Limperopoulos C. Non-Invasive Placental Perfusion Imaging in Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Heart Disease Using Velocity-Selective Arterial Spin Labeled MRI. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1): 16126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schlatterer SD, Murnick J, Jacobs M, White L, Donofrio MT, Limperopoulos C. Placental Pathology and Neuroimaging Correlates in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wernovsky G Current insights regarding neurological and developmental abnormalities in children and young adults with complex congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young. 2006;16 Suppl 1:92–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gaynor JW, Stopp C, Wypij D, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):816–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Newburger JW, Sleeper LA, Bellinger DC, et al. Early developmental outcome in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related anomalies: the single ventricle reconstruction trial. Circulation. 2012;125(17):2081–2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Silversides CK, Lionel AC, Costain G, et al. Rare copy number variations in adults with tetralogy of Fallot implicate novel risk gene pathways. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Carey AS, Liang L, Edwards J, et al. Effect of copy number variants on outcomes for infants with single ventricle heart defects. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6(5):444–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gaynor JW, Kim DS, Arrington CB, et al. Validation of association of the apolipoprotein E epsilon2 allele with neurodevelopmental dysfunction after cardiac surgery in neonates and infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2560–2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gaynor JW, Nord AS, Wernovsky G, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype modifies the risk of behavior problems after infant cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):241–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Homsy J, Zaidi S, Shen Y, et al. De novo mutations in congenital heart disease with neurodevelopmental and other congenital anomalies. Science. 2015;350(6265):1262–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Paige SL, Plonowska K, Xu A, Wu SM. Molecular regulation of cardiomyocyte differentiation. Circ Res. 2015;116(2):341–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bale TL. Epigenetic and transgenerational reprogramming of brain development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(6):332–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.West JB. Physiological Effects of Chronic Hypoxia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(20):1965–1971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yuen TJ, Silbereis JC, Griveau A, et al. Oligodendrocyte-encoded HIF function couples postnatal myelination and white matter angiogenesis. Cell. 2014;158(2):383–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sanchez O, Ruiz-Romero A, Dominguez C, et al. Brain angiogenic gene expression in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(6):734–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Russell MW, Moldenhauer JS, Rychik J, et al. Damaging Variants in Proangiogenic Genes Impair Growth in Fetuses with Cardiac Defects. The Journal of pediatrics. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Brun C, Lepore N, Pennec X, et al. A tensor-based morphometry study of genetic influences on brain structure using a new fluid registration method. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11 (Pt 2):914–921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Morton SU, Maleyeff L, Wypij D, et al. Abnormal Left-Hemispheric Sulcal Patterns Correlate with Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Subjects with Single Ventricular Congenital Heart Disease. Cereb Cortex. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Andropoulos DB, Hunter JV, Nelson DP, et al. Brain immaturity is associated with brain injury before and after neonatal cardiac surgery with high-flow bypass and cerebral oxygenation monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(3):543–556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dimitropoulos A, McQuillen PS, Sethi V, et al. Brain injury and development in newborns with critical congenital heart disease. Neurology. 2013;81(3):241–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Brossard-Racine M, du Plessis A, Vezina G, et al. Brain Injury in Neonates with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: What Is the Predictive Value of MRI in the Fetal Period? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(7):1338–1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Claessens NHP, Khalili N, Isgum I, et al. Brain and CSF Volumes in Fetuses and Neonates with Antenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A Longitudinal MRI Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(5):885–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ishibashi N, Scafidi J, Murata A, et al. White matter protection in congenital heart surgery. Circulation. 2012;125(7):859–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Agematsu K, Korotcova L, Scafidi J, Gallo V, Jonas RA, Ishibashi N. Effects of preoperative hypoxia on white matter injury associated with cardiopulmonary bypass in a rodent hypoxic and brain slice model. Pediatr Res. 2014;75(5):618–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gunn JK, Beca J, Hunt RW, Olischar M, Shekerdemian LS. Perioperative amplitude-integrated EEG and neurodevelopment in infants with congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(9):1539–1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gunn JK, Beca J, Penny DJ, et al. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography and brain injury in infants undergoing Norwood-type operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(1):170–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Claessens NHP, Noorlag L, Weeke LC, et al. Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography for Early Recognition of Brain Injury in Neonates with Critical Congenital Heart Disease. The Journal of pediatrics. 2018;202:199–205 e191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Mebius MJ, Oostdijk NJE, Kuik SJ, et al. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography during the first 72 h after birth in neonates diagnosed prenatally with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(4):798–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Naim MY, Gaynor JW, Chen J, et al. Subclinical seizures identified by postoperative electroencephalographic monitoring are common after neonatal cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(1):169–178; discussion 178-180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mulkey SB, Yap VL, Bai S, et al. Amplitude-integrated EEG in newborns with critical congenital heart disease predicts preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52(6):599–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Birca A, Vakorin VA, Porayette P, et al. Interplay of brain structure and function in neonatal congenital heart disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3(9):708–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP, Goin JE, Clark BJ. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):1277–1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Peyvandi S, De Santiago V, Chakkarapani E, et al. Association of Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease With Postnatal Brain Development and the Risk of Brain Injury. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(4):e154450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Verheijen PM, Lisowski LA, Stoutenbeek P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease affects preoperative acidosis in the newborn patient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(4):798–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Quartermain MD, Hill KD, Goldberg DJ, et al. Prenatal Diagnosis Influences Preoperative Status in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(3):489–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lynch JM, Buckley EM, Schwab PJ, et al. Time to surgery and preoperative cerebral hemodynamics predict postoperative white matter injury in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(5):2181–2188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Algra SO, Haas F, Poskitt KJ, et al. Minimizing the risk of preoperative brain injury in neonates with aortic arch obstruction. The Journal of pediatrics. 2014;165(6): 1116–1122 e1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Calderon J, Angeard N, Moutier S, Plumet MH, Jambaque I, Bonnet D. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on neurocognitive outcomes in children with transposition of the great arteries. The Journal of pediatrics. 2012;161(1):94–98 e91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(21):2183–2242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Brosig CL, Whitstone BN, Frommelt MA, Frisbee SJ, Leuthner SR. Psychological distress in parents of children with severe congenital heart disease: the impact of prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis. J Perinatol. 2007;27(11):687–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rychik J, Donaghue DD, Levy S, et al. Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013;162(2):302–307 e301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Scheinost D, Sinha R, Cross SN, et al. Does prenatal stress alter the developing connectome? Pediatr Res. 2017;81(1-2):214–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Gunn JK, Beca J, Hunt RW, et al. Perioperative risk factors for impaired neurodevelopment after cardiac surgery in early infancy. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(11):1010–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Calderon J, Stopp C, Wypij D, et al. Early-Term Birth in Single-Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease After the Fontan Procedure: Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Outcomes. The Journal of pediatrics. 2016;179:96–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Goff DA, Luan X, Gerdes M, et al. Younger gestational age is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes after cardiac surgery in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):535–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Guo T, Chau V, Peyvandi S, et al. White matter injury in term neonates with congenital heart diseases: Topology & comparison with preterm newborns. Neuroimage. 2019;185:742–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ortinau CM, Anadkat JS, Smyser CD, Eghtesady P. Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Moderate to Severe Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(1):56–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Bell JL, Saenz L, Domnina Y, et al. Acute Neurologic Injury in Children Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(6):1831–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Costello JM, Polito A, Brown DW, et al. Birth before 39 weeks' gestation is associated with worse outcomes in neonates with heart disease. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):277–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Paquette LB, Wisnowski JL, Ceschin R, et al. Abnormal cerebral microstructure in premature neonates with congenital heart disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(10):2026–2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Paquette LB, Votava-Smith JK, Ceschin R, et al. Abnormal development of thalamic microstructure in premature neonates with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36(5):960–969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


