Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is often the only curative therapy for patients with non-malignant diseases; however, many patients do not have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. Historically, poor survival was seen following HLA-haploidentical HCT due to poor immune reconstitution, increased infections, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and graft failure. Encouraging results have been reported using a nonmyeloablative T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical transplant approach in patients with hematologic malignancies. Here we report the outcomes of 23 patients with various non-malignant diseases using a similar approach. Patients received HLA-haploidentical bone marrow (n=17) or G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (n=6) grafts following conditioning with cyclophosphamide (CY) 50 mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, and 2 Gy or 4 Gy total body irradiation (TBI). Post-grafting immunosuppression consisted of CY, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, ± sirolimus. The median patient age at HCT was 10.8 years. Day 100 transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 0%. Two patients died at later time points, 1 from intracranial hemorrhage/disseminated fungal infection in the setting of graft failure and 1 from infection/GVHD. The estimated probabilities of grades II–IV and III–IV acute GVHD at day 100 and 2-year NIH-consensus chronic GVHD were 78%, 26% and 42%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 2-year overall and event-free rates of survival were 91% and 78%, respectively. These results are encouraging and demonstrate favorable disease specific lineage engraftment with low TRM in patients with non-malignant diseases using nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by T-replete HLA-haploidentical grafts. However, additional strategies are needed for GVHD prevention in order to make this a viable treatment approach for patients with non-malignant diseases.
Keywords: haploidentical transplantation, non-malignant diseases, nonmyeloablative conditioning, post-transplant cyclophosphamide
INTRODUCTION
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers curative therapy for patients with non-malignant diseases, including primary immunodeficiencies, bone marrow failure syndromes, hemophagocytic disorders, metabolic disorders and hemoglobinopathies. Historically, myeloablative regimens have been used; however, this has been associated with increased risk for morbidity and mortality due to comorbidities as a result of their underlying disease. Therefore, less intense regimens are required. However, many non-malignant diseases have increased barriers to engraftment that make it difficult to lower the intensity of the conditioning regimen. These barriers may include normocellular marrows, a history of being heavily transfused which may result in the patient being highly sensitized to HLA and minor histocompatibility antigens, as well as competent immune systems (1, 2). Therefore, less toxic conditioning regimens that are effective at establishing engraftment are needed.
Finding a donor can be another barrier for patients with non-malignant diseases. Many patients do not have a suitable HLA-matched sibling because the sibling may be affected by the same inherited disease. In addition, many of the non-malignant diseases such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia affect ethnic minorities, making it even more difficult to find a suitable HLA-matched unrelated donor (3). Specifically, the probability of finding an 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor for black Americans of all ethnic backgrounds is 16-19%, and for Asians range between 27-42% (3, 4). Historically, HLA-haploidentical HCT required myeloablative conditioning and T-cell depletion in order to decrease the risk for rejection and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). However, this resulted in inferior survival due to increased infections, poor immune reconstitution, and graft failure (5-7). Therefore, it is imperative to develop safe and effective approaches using less intense conditioning regimens for patients receiving HLA-haploidentical grafts. An HLA-haploidentical related donor is more likely to be available to such patients and has the advantage of having one completely matched HLA-haplotype. Numerous studies have now established that nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by post-HCT cyclophosphamide (PT-CY) results in low transplant-related mortality (TRM) for patients with hematologic malignancies given T-replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell grafts (8-11). The approach relies on CY to eliminate both donor and host allo-activated T cells to reduce the risk for GVHD and graft rejection (12). Studies in adult patients with hematologic malignancies demonstrated graft failure rates of approximately 13%, while acute grades II-IV and III-IV GVHD, and chronic GVHD was approximately 34%, 6%, and 5-25%, respectively (8). We reasoned that the regimen reported by Luznik/O’Donnell et al. (8, 13) consisting of CY (14.5 mg/kg/day IV on days −6 and −5), fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day IV on days −6 to −5) and 200 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI) on day −1, could be modified for treatment of patients with non-malignant diseases. First, to overcome engraftment barriers, both the total dose of CY and the dose of TBI were increased for some disorders. Second, to reduce the risk for GVHD, sirolimus was later added to the post-grafting immune suppression regimen. This change was based on the results of two separate clinical trials using nonmyeloablative conditioning in adults with hematologic malignancies given HLA matched or mismatched unrelated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts that showed decreased rates of GVHD with the addition of sirolimus (14, 15). Here we report the outcomes of the modified nonmyeloablative regimen for treatment of patients with non-malignant diseases given HLA-haploidentical T-replete grafts.
METHODS
Patients included in this analysis had a non-malignant disorder (excluding Fanconi Anemia) and underwent a nonmyeloablative T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical HCT between May 24, 2006 and July 31, 2018. Twenty-three patients were included in the analysis performed on March 22, 2019. Patients or their legal guardians provided written consent.
The modified nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen consisted of CY 25 mg/kg/day given IV on days −6 and −5 (total dose 50 mg/kg), fludarabine (FLU) 30 mg/m2/day given IV on days −6 through −2 (total dose 150 mg/m2), followed by 200 or 400 cGy TBI on day −1. In general, patients with primary immunodeficiencies received 200 cGy TBI, while patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), sickle cell disease (SCD), or other non-malignant diseases considered at increased risk for graft rejection received 400 cGy TBI (2 fractions of 200 cGy). Of the 23 patients treated, 17 received bone marrow (BM) as the stem cell source, and 6 received unmodified granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC grafts.
GVHD prophylaxis was consistent with that described for adult patients with hematologic malignancies (16). The initial four patients were given CY 50 mg/kg I.V. on day +3, and subsequent patients were given an additional dose of CY 50 mg/kg I.V. on day +4. The addition of a second dose of PT-CY was based on concurrent modifications to the adult trial for hematological malignancies, which noted a lower rate of chronic GVHD in patients who received two doses of PT-Cy versus a single dose (8). All patients received tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) beginning on day +5, as previously described. However, even with the addition of a second dose of CY for the next three patients, the incidence of acute GVHD was higher than observed for the concurrent adult cohort. Therefore, sirolimus (2 mg (>1.5 m2) or 1 mg/m2 (≤1.5 m2) orally per day) was added, starting on day +5. The addition of sirolimus was based on the results of two separate clinical trials using nonmyeloablative conditioning in adults with hematologic malignancies given HLA matched or mismatched unrelated PBSC grafts showing decreased rates of GVHD with the addition of sirolimus (14, 15). All patients received supportive care with prophylactic antimicrobials, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and weekly PCR monitoring for reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and adenovirus, according to institutional standard practices. Except for patients with SCD, G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) IV was initiated on day +5 and continued until the patient had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥500/μL for 3 consecutive days.
The pre-HCT co-morbidity score was assessed by the HCT augmented co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) (17). Diagnosis, clinical grading, and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD were performed according to established criteria (18-20). NIH chronic GVHD scoring and grading was performed according to established guidelines (21, 22). Toxicities were defined by the National Cancer Institute’s Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0, excluding hematologic toxicities (23). Procedures for immunophenotype analyses and sorting of peripheral blood cell subsets by flow cytometry have been described previously (24). Donor chimerism levels were assessed in flow cytometry sorted CD33+, CD3+, CD19+, and CD56+ subsets by PCR-based analyses of polymorphic microsatellite regions, using methods previously described (25-27).
Disease response was evaluated by disease-specific clinical parameters and cellular functional assays. Specifically, in patients with certain primary immune deficiency diseases, immune reconstitution was assessed by lymphocyte immunophenotype analysis, lymphocyte proliferation to mitogen and anti-CD3 antibody, and quantitative serum immune globulin levels (28, 29). Additional immunologic assays included neutrophil oxidative burst in patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), and natural killer (NK) cell function in patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). In patients with SAA, hematopoietic recovery was assessed by peripheral blood counts and/or bone marrow aspiration or biopsy. Hemoglobin gel electrophoresis and transfusion independence was used to assess SCD.
Study Endpoints and Statistical Analysis
Engraftment was defined as achieving an ANC >500/μL for 3 consecutive days and documentation of >5% donor CD3 T-cell chimerism. Platelet engraftment was defined as achieving a platelet count >20,000/μL without a platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days. TRM and incidence of GVHD were calculated using cumulative incidence estimates, treating death due to disease as a competing risk event for TRM, and graft rejection with disease recurrence and death as a competing risk for GVHD. The method of Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate overall survival (OS), which was defined as the duration from date of HCT to the date of death due to any cause. Event free survival (EFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with an event defined as disease recurrence, graft rejection and death. Patients last known to be alive and event free were censored at their date of last follow up. Patients who received PT-CY, TAC and MMF were assigned to the 3-drug immune suppression group, and those who received PT-CY, TAC, MMF and sirolimus were included in the 4-drug immune suppression group. Grey’s test was used to compare differences between groups. Donor chimerism comparisons were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Graphic representations of donor chimerism values across time were created by taking the chimerism value closest to days +28, day +80, day +180, and yearly thereafter up to 5 years after HCT.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics
Patient characteristics at the time of HCT are shown in Table 1. Our cohort included primarily pediatric and young adult patients, with a median age at HCT was 10.8 (range, 0.6-47.3) years. Demographic makeup consisted of African American (n=9), Caucasian (n=5), Asian (n=4), Hispanic/Latino (n=4) and Native American/Alaskan Native (n=1) patients. The majority of patients had one or more comorbidities, which placed them at increased risk for TRM (17, 30, 31). The median augmented HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was 4 (range, 0 to 10). This was the second HCT on this protocol for three patients (#5, #7, #13) who had graft rejection and recurrence of their original disease after their initial HCT. They underwent a second HCT within 55-78 days of their initial HCT. The median total nucleated cell count was 4.3×108/kg (range, 1.7–63.7×108/kg); the median CD34 count was 5.8×106/kg (range, 2.6–22.7×106/kg), and the median CD3 count was 0.5×108/kg (range, 0.01–13.7×108/kg). Seventy-four percent of patients were ABO matched with their donors (n=17), while the remainder had either a major ABO mismatch (n=5) or a minor ABO mismatch (n=1). Eighty-seven percent of donors were parents (n=20), and the remainder were siblings (n=2) or offspring (n=1).
Table 1.
Patient and pre-HCT characteristics.
| Patient no. | Age at HCT (years) / gender |
Diagnosis | CMV donor / recipient serology |
Lansky/ Karnofsky score |
Augmented HCT-CI score |
Pre-HCT co-morbidities |
TBI dose (cGy) |
Cell source |
GVHD prophylaxis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe aplastic anemia/marrow failure | |||||||||
| 1 | 6 / F | SAA | D+ / R− | 100 | 2 | Iron overload | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC |
| 2 | 21 / F | SAA | D+ / R+ | 90 | 8 | Pulmonary aspergillus, iron overload, cardiomyopathy | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 3 | 12 / M | SAA | D+ / R+ | 70 | 10 | Candida fungemia, intracranial hemorrhage, pulmonary hemorrhage | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 4 | 16 / M | SAA | D+ / R+ | 100 | 1 | CNI induced AKI | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 5 | 7 / F | SAA | D− / R+ | N/A | 4 | Rejected HLA-mismatched DUCB HCT 55 days before haploidentical HCT | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x1), MMF, TAC |
| 6 | 10 / M | SAA | D+ / R+ | 90 | 2 | CKD stage II | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC |
| 7 | 7 / M | SAA | D+ / R+ | 100 | 6 | Rejected HLA-mismatched URD HCT 78 days before haploidentical HCT | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 8 | 10 / M | DKC | D− / R− | 100 | 1 | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus | |
| Hemoglobinopathies | |||||||||
| 9 | 11 / M | SCD | D+ / R− | 80 | 6 | Stroke, acute chest syndrome, iron overload | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 10 | 13 / M | SCD | D+ / R− | 90 | 2 | Acute chest syndrome, splenic sequestration, iron overload | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 11 | 15/ M | SCD | D− / R− | 100 | 3 | Acute chest syndrome | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 12 | 47 / M | SCD | D+ / R+ | 70 | 6 | Stroke, Pulmonary embolism | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 13 | 13 / M | SCD | D+ / R+ | 100 | 7 | Rejected HLA-haploidentical HCT 65 days before haploidentical HCT from same donor. Stroke with moyamoya, iron overload | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| Hemophagocytic disorders | |||||||||
| 14 | 13 / F | HLH | D+ / R− | 50 | 7 | Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, left pontine hemorrhage | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x1), MMF, TAC |
| 15 | 10 / F | HLH | D+ / R− | 70 | 2 | CNS HLH, history of ECMO, CRRT at diagnosis | 400 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 16 | 16 / M | HLH | D+ / R− | 80 | 5 | CKD stage III | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 17 | 32 / M | HLH | D+ / R+ | 100 | 4 | Candida fungemia | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| 18 | 1 / F | HLH | D+ / R+ | 90 | 2 | EBV driven HLH, CNS disease, Cytogenetic abnormality | 400 | PBSC | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| Primary immunodeficiency diseases | |||||||||
| 19 | 0.8 / M | X-SCID | D+ / R+ | 100 | 4 | CMV pneumonia, PJP pneumonia | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x1), MMF, TAC |
| 20 | 1 / M | X-SCID | D+ / R− | 100 | 1 | Metapneumovir us infection | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x1), MMF, TAC |
| 21 | 0.6 / M | X-SCID | D+ / R− | 100 | 3 | PJP pneumonia | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC |
| 22 | 5 / F | CGD | D+ / R+ | 80 | 6 | Pulmonary aspergillus, invasive Geosmithia argillacea chest wall fungal infection received pre-HCT granulocyte infusions | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus |
| Glanzmann thrombasthenia | |||||||||
| 23 | 2 / M | GT | D+ / R+ | 100 | 0 | 200 | BM | PT-CY (x2), MMF, TAC, Sirolimus | |
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CGD, chronic granulomatous disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CNS, central nervous system; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; D, donor; DKC, dyskeratosis congenita; DUCB, double umbilical cord blood; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; GT, Glanzmann Thrombasthenia; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; PJP, N/A, not available; Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia; PT-CY, post-transplant cyclophosphamide; R, recipient; SAA, severe aplastic anemia; SCD, sickle cell disease; TAC, tacrolimus; TBI, total body irradiation; URD, unrelated donor; X-SCID, X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disorder.
Engraftment and Chimerism
Donor engraftment (defined as achieving an ANC >500/μL for 3 consecutive days and >5% donor CD3 T-cell chimerism) was established in 22 patients (95%) including the 3 patients who had a rejected a previous HCT. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 16.5 (range, 10-25) days. Following exclusion of the patients with sickle cell disease who received regular platelet transfusions to maintain a platelet count >50,000/μL, the median time to platelet recovery of 20,000 or 50,000/μL × 7 days was 29 (range, 0–36) and 29 (range, 11–41) days, respectively. Primary graft rejection with subsequent autologous recovery was observed in one patient with CGD who received 200 cGy TBI as part of the conditioning.
Donor chimerism levels of CD3, CD33, and CD56 subsets at the most recent evaluation are shown in Table 2. The majority of patients had full donor CD3 ≥95% (n=19) or CD33 ≥95% (n=15) chimerism. Specifically, full donor CD3, CD33, and CD56 chimerism was established in all patients treated for SAA and HLH. In addition, full donor (n=3) or high-level mixed (50%–94%; n=2) CD3, CD33, and CD56 engraftment was established in all five patients with SCD. Similar to other studies (32-34), split donor/host chimerism was observed in the three patients treated for severe combined immunodeficiency disorder (SCID). Specifically, all three patients with SCID had 100% donor CD3 chimerism but lost the myeloid graft. Donor B-cell chimerism was variable, with one patient with SCID having low-level (29%) donor B-cell engraftment and one patient having complete loss of the B cell graft. B cell chimerism was not quantifiable in the third patient with SCID who was receiving several immunosuppressive agents for GVHD treatment. The patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia had low-level CD3 and CD56 engraftment but had complete loss of the myeloid graft.
Table 2.
Transplant Outcomes.
| Patient no. |
Diagnosis | Non- hematological toxicities within the first 30 days post- HCT |
Viral reactivation (treatment ) within day +100 |
Acute GVHD grade |
Chronic GVHD |
Off immune- suppression (months post- HCT) |
Donor Chimerism (%)* |
Outcomes (time of last follow up), disease response |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD 3 |
CD3 3 |
CD5 6 |
||||||||
| Severe Aplastic Anemia/Marrow Failure | ||||||||||
| 1 | SAA | — | — | — | — | 5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.5 yrs), normal blood counts-transfusion independent |
| 2 | SAA | Grade 3 pericardial effusion | CMV (ganciclovir) BK viruria/viremia (none) | Grade II | Yes | 23 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.1 yrs), mild thrombocytopen ia- transfusion independent |
| 3 | SAA | Grade 3 Pancreatitis, typhlitis Grade 4 hypoxia (ventilation) | Adenovire mia (brincidofo vir), EBV (rituximab), BK viruria (none), HHV6 viremia (none) | Grade III | Yes | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.7 yrs), poor graft function with ongoing cytopenias on eltrombopag, transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia |
| 4 | SAA | — | CMV (ganciclovir) | Grade II | Yes | 21 | 100 | 100 | 99 | Alive (2.7 yrs), normal blood counts-transfusion independent |
| 5 | SAA | Grade 3 Pancreatitis, typhlitis, pneumonitis (non-invasive ventilation) | CMV (ganciclovir), HSV nasal lesion (acyclovir), BK viruria/viremia (none) | Grade III | Yes | 24 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (5.7 yrs), normal blood counts-transfusion independent |
| 6 | SAA | — | CMV (foscarnet) | Grade II | Yes | 41 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (3.8 yrs), normal blood counts-transfusion independent |
| 7 | SAA | — | Adenovirus (cidofovir), EBV (none), HSV stomatitis (acyclovir) | Grade II | Yes | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (1.6 yrs), normal blood counts-transfusion independent |
| 8 | DKC | — | — | — | — | 11.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (1.6 yrs), normal blood counts - transfusion independent, 40-60% marrow cellularity at 1 year |
| Hemoglobinopathies | ||||||||||
| 9 | SCD | — | CMV (ganciclovir) BK viruria (none), | Grade II | Yes | ongoing | 67 | 68 | 70 | Alive (3.1 yrs), Hb S 34% (donor with Hb S trait), resolution of symptoms |
| 10 | SCD | — | — | Grade II | Yes | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.5 yrs), Hb S 24% (donor with Hb S trait), resolution of symptoms |
| 11 | SCD | — | — | — | — | ongoing | 51 | 87 | 56 | Alive (1.7 yrs), Hb S 34% (donor with Hb S trait), resolution of symptoms |
| 12 | SCD | — | CMV (ganciclovir) | Grade II | — | 29 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.4 yrs), Hb S 25% (donor with Hb S trait), resolution of symptoms |
| 13 | SCD | — | CMV (ganciclovir) HHV6 viremia (none), BK viremia/vir uria (none) | Grade III | — | 29 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.7 yrs), Hb S 26% (donor with Hb S trait), resolution of symptoms |
| Hemophagocytic Disorders | ||||||||||
| 14 | HLH | Grade 3 CNS (seizure), typhlitis, renal failure (reversible); Grade 4 septic shock, hypoxia (ventilation), pancreatitis | EBV (none) | Grade II | Yes | 28 | 100 | 92 | 64 | Alive (10.1 yrs), normal NK function, clinical remission |
| 15 | HLH | — | Grade II | — | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (0.6 yrs), normal NK function, clinical remission | |
| 16 | HLH | — | CMV (ganciclovir) | Grade II | — | 13 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.2 yrs), normal NK function, clinical remission |
| 17 | HLH | — | CMV (ganciclovir) | Grade II | Yes | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (2.8 yrs), normal NK function, clinical remission |
| 18 | HLH | — | CMV (foscarnet), EBV (none) | — | — | ongoing | 100 | 100 | 100 | Alive (1 yr), normal NK function, clinical remission, resolution of cytogenetic abnormality |
| Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases | ||||||||||
| 19# | X-SCID | — | CMV (foscarnet) | Grade II | Yes | 56 | 100 | 0 | 100 | Alive (11 yrs), normal absolute CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 lymphocyte numbers, T-cell proliferation to PHA and anti-CD3 within normal range compared to control, remains on immunoglobulin replacement |
| 20# | X-SCID | — | CMV (ganciclovir) EBV (none), | Grade IV | Yes | at time of death | 100 | 0 | 95 | Died (1.4 yrs), cause of death related to chronic extensive skin GVHD and disseminated candidemia, severe persistent lymphopenia, no significant T-cell proliferation in response to PHA and anti-CD3, on immunosuppression |
| 21# | X-SCID | — | Grade III | Yes | 42.5 | 100 | 0 | 24 | Alive (7.1 yrs), normal absolute CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 lymphocyte numbers, T-cell proliferation to PHA and anti-CD3 within normal range compared to control, remains on immunoglobulin replacement | |
| 22** | CGD | Grade 3 pneumatosis, AKI, hypoxia (non-invasive ventilation) | CMV (foscarnet), BK viruria (none) | — | — | 2.5 | 0** | 0 | 0 | Died (0.5 yrs), cause of death related to pre-HCT fungal infection and continued CGD in setting of myeloid graft loss |
| Glanzmann Thrombasthenia | ||||||||||
| 23 | GT | — | CMV (ganciclovir) adenovirus (cidofovir) | Grade III | Yes | 14 | 21 | 0 | 10 | Alive (2.2 yrs) continued disease: gpIIb and gpIIa antibodies still present post-HCT |
At time of last follow-up
Primary graft rejection
B cell chimerism at last follow up- patient 19: 29% donor, patient 20: not quantifiable, and patient 21: 0% donor
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; gp, glycoprotein; GVHD, graft-vs-host disease; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; HHV6, human herpesvirus 6; HSV, herpes simplex virus; yrs, years;
Graft-Versus-Host Disease
The cumulative incidences (CI) of grade II-IV and III-IV GVHD in patients who received 3-drug vs. 4-drug immune suppression were 86% vs. 75% (p=0.33) and 43% vs. 19% respectively (p=0.24; Figure 1). The 2-year CI of NIH-consensus chronic GVHD was 43% in the 3-drug group compared to 38% in the 4-drug group (p=0.93). The 2-year CI of extensive chronic GVHD in patients who received 3-drugs vs. 4-drugs was 86% vs. 52%, respectively (p=0.07). Although there appeared to be lower incidences of acute and chronic GVHD in the cohort given four drugs, the differences were not statistically significant, likely due to small patient numbers. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD or NIH chronic and chronic extensive GVHD between recipients of BM versus PBSC grafts (data not shown).
Figure 1. Acute and chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD).

Shown is the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV (panel A), grades III-IV (panel B), and extensive chronic GVHD (Panel C) according to 3 versus 4-drug immune suppression.
Disease Response
The most recent disease response assessments for each patient are shown in Table 2. Of the 23 patients, 19 had improvement in or resolution of their disease. Of the three patients with X-SCID, two demonstrated clinical improvement without significant infections since 1-year post-HCT. In addition, both patients had a CD3 count >300 cell/μl and a CD8 count >50 cells/μL by day+100, which has recently been shown to be prognostic of survival in patients with SCID (28). Both patients had evidence of normal T-cell proliferation in response to both PHA and anti-CD3 at 5 years post-HCT. However, both patients remained on IVIG replacement at time of last follow-up likely secondary to low-level or complete loss of the donor B-cell graft. One patient with SCID continued to have poor immune reconstitution 1.4 years post-HCT due to chronic extensive skin GVHD requiring continued immune suppression at time of death and was therefore unevaluable for disease response. In addition, one patient with CGD had disease recurrence due to loss of the myeloid graft.
Normal NK function was established in all 5 patients with HLH. Six of seven patients with SAA maintained normal blood counts and transfusion-independence. One patient with SAA had poor graft function with continued transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia and ongoing eltrombopag therapy despite having 100% donor myeloid engraftment. All patients with SCD had improved hemoglobin levels (median 11.2 g/dL; range 9.0–14.9 g/dL), became transfusion independent, had hemoglobin S percentage levels consistent with the donor having sickle cell trait (24%-34%), and had no further episodes of vaso-occlusive crisis. The patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia also had disease recurrence following complete loss of the myeloid graft.
Transplant-Related Complications
Non-hematologic toxicities possibly related to the conditioning regimen are summarized in Table 2. Three patients developed one or more toxicities within the first 30 days post-HCT [grade 3 (n=3) or grade 4 (n=2)]. None of the patients developed veno-occlusive disease, including the three patients with a history of iron overload pre-HCT, and none developed mucositis. One patient with HLH and a history of stroke pre-HCT had a single focal seizure (grade 3) on day +5 post-HCT in the setting of tacrolimus and sepsis.
Sixteen patients developed one or more viral reactivations or infections requiring treatment within the first 100 days post-HCT (Table 2). EBV reactivation was detected in 5 patients, of which one required rituximab. CMV reactivation was detected in 11 of the 13 patients who were CMV seropositive pre-HCT, and in 3 of the 8 patients who were CMV seronegative pre-HCT but received grafts from CMV positive donors. All patients received pre-emptive antiviral treatment and had complete resolution of CMV reactivation. Adenovirus was detected in three patients requiring treatment with complete resolution. Additional viral infections included BK virus (n=6), human herpes virus 6 (n=2), and herpes simplex virus (n=2).
Overall Survival and Transplant-Related Mortality
With a median follow up of 2.5 (range 0.5-11) years, 21 patients are alive with a 2-year OS of 91% (95% CI; 68%–98%; Figure 2). Day +100 and 1-year TRM were 0% and 4%, respectively. The 2-year event free survival (EFS) was 78% (95% CI; 54%–90%). Two patients died. One patient with CGD and disseminated mold infection present at time of conditioning died of progressive mold infection in the setting of graft rejection at 6 months post-HCT. In addition, one patient with SCID died of chronic extensive skin GVHD and disseminated candidemia at 16 months post-HCT.
Figure 2.

Shown are the Kaplan Meir estimates of overall survival (solid line), event-free survival (dotted line), and the cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (dashed line).
DISCUSSION
This current study found that HLA-haploidentical HCT, originally developed to treat adult patients with hematological malignancies by Luznik et al. could be modified and applied successfully to treat patients with various non-malignant disorders (16). The two-year OS for patients with a variety of non-malignant diseases, including aplastic anemia, immunodeficiency disorders, sickle cell disease and hemophagocytic disorders, was 91%. Evaluation of all 23 patients revealed the two-year EFS was 78%, with events defined as disease recurrence, graft rejection and death. Day 100 and 1-year TRM were low at 0% and 4%, respectively, which compares favorably to the adult trial (16). Our results showed that patients with high augmented HCT-CI scores can tolerate a moderately more intensive nonmyeloablative regimen in the setting of PT-CY. Bolaños-Meade et al., DeZern et al., Thakar et al. and Bonfim et al. have published similar outcomes using nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens and PT-CY in patients with SCD, SAA and Fanconi anemia, respectively (35-38).
For patients with non-malignant diseases, we presumed that the barrier to engraftment would be higher because of the risk of transfusion-induced sensitization to the HLA-haploidentical graft; therefore, we intensified the regimen with the goal of maintaining engraftment without increasing toxicity or TRM. The total dose of CY given during conditioning was increased slightly from 28 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg, bringing the overall dose of CY given pre- and post-HCT to 150 mg/kg. Patients considered at increased risk for graft rejection, specifically those with intact immune systems and/or robust hematopoiesis, received an additional 200 cGy TBI, for a total nonmyeloablative dose of 400 cGy TBI. Since many patients with these diseases undergo HCT in childhood, we did not wish to mandate that all patients be exposed to 400 cGy TBI, but only those who were considered at increased risk for graft rejection. The modified nonmyeloablative regimen resulted in favorable disease-specific lineage engraftment for most of our patients. However, graft rejection occurred in one patient treated for CGD. This patient received granulocyte transfusions from unrelated donors before HCT secondary to an invasive pulmonary and chest wall mold infection. Although T cell cytotoxic crossmatch between the patient and donor was negative one month prior to HCT, this patient continued to receive granulocyte transfusions until the start of conditioning and after HCT. Therefore, this patient may have become sensitized to major and minor histocompatibility antigens and, as a result, may have developed reactive class I and class II panel-reactive antibodies (PRAs), thereby increasing their risk for rejection (39-41). In comparison, Bolaños-Meade reported their experience using CY 28 mg/kg, FLU 150 mg/kg and 200 cGy TBI with the addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in adult patients with SCD given HLA-haploidentical grafts and noted a higher graft failure rate of 43% (35). They subsequently intensified the regimen by increasing the TBI dose to 400 cGy and showed a decrease in the incidence of graft failure to 6%, with 76% of patients achieving full donor chimerism (42).
Alloreactivity of the donor graft plays an important role in establishing donor hematopoiesis after nonmyeloablative HCT, and for patients with hematologic malignancies also contributes an important graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effect to prevent relapse (43-45). The original Luznik/O’Donnell study found PT-CY could control the risk for acute GVHD, reporting the incidence of day +200 grade II–IV and III–IV GVHD of 34% and 6%, respectively (16). Subsequent retrospective studies in adult patients treated for hematologic malignancies have reported similar incidences (46, 47). Since patients with non-malignant diseases do not benefit from GVL, we intensified the post-HCT immune suppression to include sirolimus, based on promising results from randomized trials in adults with hematologic malignancies given nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor matched or mismatched PBSC grafts (14, 15). Although we found a lower incidence of acute grade III-IV GVHD in recipients of 4-drug versus 3-drug immune suppression, this difference was not significant likely due to small patient numbers. Importantly, the addition of sirolimus did not appear to result in increased toxicities. Nonetheless, despite the addition of sirolimus to post-grafting immune suppression, the rates of acute and chronic GVHD were higher compared to that reported in adult patients with hematologic malignancies (16).
It is not intuitively obvious why the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was increased in our patients with non-malignant diseases. Several studies using haploidentical bone marrow HCT followed by PT-CY in patients with non-malignant diseases have reported lower rates of GVHD (36, 48-52). Several of these studies included serotherapy, which may in part explain the lower incidence of GVHD. Although PBSC has been associated with an increased incidence of chronic GVHD (53, 54), there was still a high rate of acute and chronic GVHD in our BM recipients. Therefore, we do not think the higher rate of GVHD seen was solely due to the use of PBSC grafts. Our study population also included much younger patients; therefore, it is plausible that age-associated differences in CY metabolism may have contributed to less stringent control of alloreactive T cells. In a recent study of HLA-haploidentical HCT with PT-CY in pediatric patients with acute leukemia, the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 40.3% (55). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis found that acute GVHD developed in 80% of patients <10 years of age compared to 13.3% in those patients between 10-20 years of age at time of HCT (P = 0.001) (55). Similar to known variability in metabolism of other chemotherapy agents such as busulfan, studies have demonstrated that CY metabolism in pediatric patients is associated with age and body-surface area (56). These insights suggest that future studies utilizing PT-CY in pediatric patients should incorporate assessments of CY pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics and aim to establish optimal dosing strategies of PT-CY to reduce GVHD. We observed a high rate of viral reactivation within the first 100 days post-HCT, with 16 of 23 patients (70%) requiring treatment for CMV, adenovirus, EBV and HSV reactivation post-HCT. Importantly, none of the patients died from viral infections. Others have report similar incidences of viral reactivation (35%-84%) in patients undergoing haploidentical T-cell replete HCT utilizing PT-CY (57-59). Contributing factors to viral reactivation requiring treatment in our study may be due to a high number of patients with pre-HCT viral exposures and a high rate of GVHD requiring additional immunosuppression. Due to limited numbers we were unable to evaluate if the addition of sirolimus contributed to viral reactivation requiring treatment post-HCT.
Although this study included a heterogeneous group of diagnoses, the individuals in our study cohort share some of the common problems of chronic infections, inflammation, and shortened life expectancy; therefore, the goals of reducing the intensity of the conditioning regimen, reducing rates of GVHD and TRM, and maximizing sustained donor engraftment and cure are the same. The modified nonmyeloablative regimen for HLA-haploidentical HCT appears to be a reasonable treatment approach for high-risk patients with life threatening comorbidities; however, additional strategies are needed for GVHD prevention in order to optimize this approach for patients with non-malignant diseases.
HIGHLIGHTS.
Modified nonmyeloablative conditioning has a low toxicity profile
Overall survival of 91% and event-free survival of 78%
High incidence of acute and chronic GHVD
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the nursing and clinical staff, the referring physicians, and the patients who participated in this trial. We also thank Ethan Melville for data management; Courtney Vandervlugt and Bernie McLaughlin for protocol management; and Helen Crawford for assistance with manuscript preparation.
Supported in part by grants: Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P01 HL122173 and P30CA015704. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, which had no involvement in the study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; nor in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Footnotes
Financial disclosure
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ciurea SO, de Lima M, Cano P, Korbling M, Giralt S, Shpall EJ, et al. High risk of graft failure in patients with anti-HLA antibodies undergoing haploidentical stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;88(8):1019–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Warren RP, Storb R, Weiden PL, Su PJ, Thomas ED. Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in patients with aplastic anemia: distinguishing transfusion-induced sensitization from possible immune-mediated aplastic anemia. Transplant Proc. 1981;13(1 Pt 1):245–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gragert L, Eapen M, Williams E, Freeman J, Spellman S, Baitty R, et al. HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;371(4):339–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bhatia M, Jin Z, Baker C, Geyer MB, Radhakrishnan K, Morris E, et al. Reduced toxicity, myeloablative conditioning with BU, fludarabine, alemtuzumab and SCT from sibling donors in children with sickle cell disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(7):913–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haddad E, Landais P, Friedrich W, Gerritsen B, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Morgan G, et al. Long-term immune reconstitution and outcome after HLA-nonidentical T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency: a European retrospective study of 116 patients. Blood. 1998;91(10):3646–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gennery AR, Slatter MA, Grandin L, Taupin P, Cant AJ, Veys P, et al. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells and long-term survival for primary immunodeficiencies in Europe: entering a new century, do we do better? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(3):602–10 e1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sodani P, Isgro A, Gaziev J, Polchi P, Paciaroni K, Marziali M, et al. Purified T-depleted, CD34+ peripheral blood and bone marrow cell transplantation from haploidentical mother to child with thalassemia. Blood. 2010;115(6):1296–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luznik L, O'Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(6):641–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McCurdy SR, Kasamon YL, Kanakry CG, Bolanos-Meade J, Tsai HL, Showel MM, et al. Comparable composite endpoints after HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Haematologica. 2017;102(2):391–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burroughs LM, O'Donnell PV, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, Luznik L, Symons HJ, et al. Comparison of outcomes of HLA-matched related, unrelated, or HLA-haploidentical related hematopoietic cell transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(11):1279–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Srour SA, Milton DR, Bashey A, Karduss-Urueta A, Al Malki MM, Romee R, et al. Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(2):318–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luznik L, O'Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for tolerance induction in HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Semin Oncol. 2012;39(6):683–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.O'Donnell PV, Luznik L, Jones RJ, Vogelsang GB, Leffell MS, Phelps M, et al. Nonmyeloablative bone marrow transplantation from partially HLA-mismatched related donors using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8(7):377–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kornblit B, Maloney DG, Storer BE, Maris MB, Vindelov L, Hari P, et al. A randomized phase II trial of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus after non-myeloablative unrelated donor transplantation. Haematologica. 2014;99(10):1624–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sandmaier BM, Kornblit B, Storer BE, Olesen G, Maris MB, Langston AA, et al. Addition of sirolimus to standard cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for patients after unrelated non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(8):e409–e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Luznik L, O'Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(6):641–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vaughn JE, Storer BE, Armand P, Raimondi R, Gibson C, Rambaldi A, et al. Design and validation of an augmented hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index comprising pretransplant ferritin, albumin, and platelet count for prediction of outcomes after allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(8):1418–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone marrow transplantation. 1995;15(6):825–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2005;11(12):945–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mielcarek M, Furlong T, Storer BE, Green ML, McDonald GB, Carpenter PA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of lower dose prednisone for initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a randomized controlled trial. Haematologica. 2015;100(6):842–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jagasia MH, Greinix HT, Arora M, Williams KM, Wolff D, Cowen EW, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(3):389–401 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee SJ. Classification systems for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;129(1):30–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Revised Common Toxicity Criteria: Version 2.0. DCTD N, NIH, DHHS. 1999.
- 24.Burroughs LM, Storb R, Leisenring WM, Pulsipher MA, Loken MR, Torgerson TR, et al. Intensive postgrafting immune suppression combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning for transplantation of HLA-identical hematopoietic cell grafts: results of a pilot study for treatment of primary immunodeficiency disorders. Bone marrow transplantation. 2007;40(7):633–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scharf SJ, Smith AG, Hansen JA, McFarland C, Erlich HA. Quantitative determination of bone marrow transplant engraftment using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction primers for human identity markers. Blood. 1995;85(7):1954–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kasai K, Nakamura Y, White R. Amplification of a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) locus (pMCT118) by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and its application to forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35(5):1196–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boerwinkle E, Xiong WJ, Fourest E, Chan L. Rapid typing of tandemly repeated hypervariable loci by the polymerase chain reaction: application to the apolipoprotein B 3' hypervariable region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(1):212–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Heimall J, Logan BR, Cowan MJ, Notarangelo LD, Griffith LM, Puck JM, et al. Immune reconstitution and survival of 100 SCID patients post-hematopoietic cell transplant: a PIDTC natural history study. Blood. 2017;130(25):2718–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mazzolari E, Forino C, Guerci S, Imberti L, Lanfranchi A, Porta F, et al. Long-term immune reconstitution and clinical outcome after stem cell transplantation for severe T-cell immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(4):892–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sorror ML. How I assess comorbidities before hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2013;121(15):2854–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith AR, Majhail NS, MacMillan ML, Defor TE, Jodele S, Lehmann LE, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index predicts transplantation outcomes in pediatric patients. Blood. 2011;117(9):2728–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stikvoort A, Gertow J, Sundin M, Remberger M, Mattsson J, Uhlin M. Chimerism patterns of long-term stable mixed chimeras posthematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with nonmalignant diseases: follow-up of long-term stable mixed chimerism patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(5):838–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rao K, Adams S, Qasim W, Allwood Z, Worth A, Silva J, et al. Effect of stem cell source on long-term chimerism and event-free survival in children with primary immunodeficiency disorders after fludarabine and melphalan conditioning regimen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(4):1152–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moratto D, Giliani S, Bonfim C, Mazzolari E, Fischer A, Ochs HD, et al. Long-term outcome and lineage-specific chimerism in 194 patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome treated by hematopoietic cell transplantation in the period 1980-2009: an international collaborative study. Blood. 2011;118(6):1675–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bolanos-Meade J, Fuchs EJ, Luznik L, Lanzkron SM, Gamper CJ, Jones RJ, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide expands the donor pool for patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2012;120(22):4285–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.DeZern AE, Zahurak M, Symons H, Cooke K, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. Alternative Donor Transplantation with High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(3):498–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thakar MS, Bonfim C, Sandmaier BM, O'Donnell P, Ribeiro L, Gooley T, et al. Cyclophosphamide-based in vivo T-cell depletion for HLA-haploidentical transplantation in Fanconi anemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012;29(6):568–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bonfim C, Ribeiro L, Nichele S, Loth G, Bitencourt M, Koliski A, et al. Haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for children and adolescents with Fanconi anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(2):310–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.O'Donghaile D, Childs RW, Leitman SF. Blood consult: granulocyte transfusions to treat invasive aspergillosis in a patient with severe aplastic anemia awaiting mismatched hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119(6):1353–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Spellman S, Bray R, Rosen-Bronson S, Haagenson M, Klein J, Flesch S, et al. The detection of donor-directed, HLA-specific alloantibodies in recipients of unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation is predictive of graft failure. Blood. 2010;115(13):2704–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stroncek DF, Leonard K, Eiber G, Malech HL, Gallin JI, Leitman SF. Alloimmunization after granulocyte transfusions. Transfusion. 1996;36(11-12):1009–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bolanos-Meade J, Cooke KR, Gamper CJ, Ali SA, Ambinder RF, Borrello IM, et al. Effect of increased dose of total body irradiation on graft failure associated with HLA-haploidentical transplantation in patients with severe haemoglobinopathies: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(4):e183–e93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Storb R, Yu C, Wagner JL, Deeg HJ, Nash RA, Kiem HP, et al. Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in DLA-identical littermate dogs given sublethal total body irradiation before and pharmacological immunosuppression after marrow transplantation. Blood. 1997;89(8):3048–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Niederwieser D, Maris M, Shizuru JA, Petersdorf E, Hegenbart U, Sandmaier BM, et al. Low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) and fludarabine followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-matched or mismatched unrelated donors and postgrafting immunosuppression with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can induce durable complete chimerism and sustained remissions in patients with hematological diseases. Blood. 2003;101(4):1620–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Maris MB, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier BM, Storer B, Stuart M, Maloney D, et al. HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2003;102(6):2021–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J, et al. Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood. 2011;118(2):282–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ciurea SO, Zhang MJ, Bacigalupo AA, Bashey A, Appelbaum FR, Aljitawi OS, et al. Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;126(8):1033–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Esteves I, Bonfim C, Pasquini R, Funke V, Pereira NF, Rocha V, et al. Haploidentical BMT and post-transplant Cy for severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter retrospective study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(5):685–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Saraf SL, Oh AL, Patel PR, Sweiss K, Koshy M, Campbell-Lee S, et al. Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Demonstrates Stable Engraftment in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(8):1759–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bolanos-Meade J, Fuchs EJ, Luznik L, Lanzkron SM, Gamper CJ, Jones RJ, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide expands the donor pool for patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2012;120(22):4285–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kurzay M, Hauck F, Schmid I, Wiebking V, Eichinger A, Jung E, et al. T-cell replete haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and post-transplant cyclophosphamide for patients with inborn errors. Haematologica. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shah NN, Freeman AF, Su H, Cole K, Parta M, Moutsopoulos NM, et al. Haploidentical Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Dedicator-of-Cytokinesis 8 Deficiency Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(6):980–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.McCurdy SR, Zhang MJ, St Martin A, Al Malki MM, Bashey A, Gaballa S, et al. Effect of donor characteristics on haploidentical transplantation with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Blood Adv. 2018;2(3):299–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Bacigalupo A, Gulbas Z, Koc Y, Blaise D, et al. Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in haploidentical transplants using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Cancer. 2018;124(7):1428–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jaiswal SR, Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee S, Ray K, Chakrabarti S. Haploidentical transplantation in children with unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell graft: The need to look beyond post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in younger children. Pediatr Transplant. 2016;20(5):675–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McCune JS, Salinger DH, Vicini P, Oglesby C, Blough DK, Park JR. Population pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and metabolites in children with neuroblastoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49(1):88–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fayard A, Daguenet E, Blaise D, Chevallier P, Labussiere H, Berceanu A, et al. Evaluation of infectious complications after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide following reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning: a study on behalf of the Francophone Society of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(10):1586–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ciurea SO, Mulanovich V, Saliba RM, Bayraktar UD, Jiang Y, Bassett R, et al. Improved early outcomes using a T cell replete graft compared with T cell depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(12):1835–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Crocchiolo R, Bramanti S, Vai A, Sarina B, Mineri R, Casari E, et al. Infections after T-replete haploidentical transplantation and high-dose cyclophosphamide as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17(2):242–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
