Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Jun 8;31:105843. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105843

Dataset on leaching properties of coal ashes from Malaysian coal power plant

Salmia Beddu a,, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan b, Mahyun Mohd Zainoodin c, Taimur Khan d, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar e, Okta Nurika f, Hisyam Jusoh g, Saba Yavari h, Nur Liyana Mohd Kamal i, Abdulnoor A Ghanim j, Siddhartha Pati k, Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah l
PMCID: PMC7306575  PMID: 32596432

Abstract

Coal combustion by-products (CCPs) (i.e. fly (FA) and bottom (BA) ashes) generated by power plants contain heavy metals. This research presents leaching properties of coal ashes (FA and BA) collected from Jimah coal-fired power station, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan using USEPA standard methods namely toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), and synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP). Heavy metals like lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and arsenic (As) were quantified using atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS). The leached of heavy metals fluxes were Cu < Zn < Pb < As. As leached the most whilst indicating of possible contamination from As. Overall, the ranges of leached concentration were adhered to permissible limits of hazardous waste criteria for metal (Pb and As) and industrial effluent (Zn and Cu). The presented data has potential reuse as reference for the coal ash concrete mixed design application in construction industries.

Keywords: Leaching properties, Coal ashes, Power plant, Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, Synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, Heavy metals


Specifications table

Subject Engineering
Specific subject area Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering
Type of data Table
How data were acquired Instruments:
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (SHIMADZU, AA-6800).
Data format Raw data
Parameters for data collection Concentration of heavy metals such as lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and arsenic (As) (mg/L)
Description of data collection The coal ash samples namely fly and bottom ashes were collected from Malaysian coal-fired power station. Fly ash is fine ash particles collected from electrostatic precipitators or filter fabric baghouses. Meanwhile, bottom ash is coarse, granular particles collected from the furnaces bottom.
Data source location Institution: Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional
City/Town/Region: Jalan Ikram-Uniten, 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan
Country: Peninsular Malaysia
Latitude and longitude (and GPS coordinates) for collected samples/data: Jimah coal-fired power station, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Peninsular Malaysia (2°35′40.0"N 101°43′24.5"E).
Data accessibility Data is provided in the article.

Value of the data

  • The data can be used by civil engineers as reference for the application of concrete mix design containing coal ash in construction industries.

  • The leaching properties data will benefit scientific community and public authority on hazardous waste management like coal ashes via a strict monitoring and legislated guidelines.

  • The data will give an additional value for further spatial temporal studies on leaching properties of heavy metals infused in concrete mixed designs before application in the construction industries to prevent any environmental impact from the use of CCPs.

1. Data description

Coal fired power plant generates mass production of coal combustion by-products such as fly (FA) and bottom (BA) ashes [1]. The leaching of heavy metals fluxes may contribute to adverse environmental and health impacts due to bioaccumulation in soft tissues, toxic at certain level of concentration and period of exposure [[2], [3], [4]5]. Therefore, the dataset presented leaching properties of four heavy metals namely lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and arsenic (As) in coal ashes.

The permissible limit of heavy metals for leaching test is categorized as hazardous waste criteria (mg/L) and hazardous waste limit (mg/L) [6]. Hazardous waste criteriaa refers (mg/L) to limits that are allowed in solid waste or soil for disposal in a landfill (i.e. Pb: 100.0 mg/L, and; As: 100 mg/L). The hazardous waste limitsb (mg/L) are the limits allowed to leach out of soil or solid waste in a landfill (i.e. Pb: 5.0 mg/L, and; As: 5.0 mg/L). However, limits for Zn and Cu are not available. Therefore, limits for industrial effluents regulations [7] and national standards for drinking water quality by Malaysia government [8] are included in this study. The limits for industrial effluent are Standard A (Pb: 0.1 mg/L; Zn: 1.0 mg/L; Cu: 0.2 mg/L and; As: 0.05 mg/L) and Standard B (Pb: 0.5 mg/L; Zn: 1.0 mg/L; Cu: 1.0 mg/L and; As: 0.01 mg/L) [7]. The concentration of heavy metals leached from coal ashes (FA, BA, and FA+BA) after the acidic leaching tests along with standards for hazardous waste are shown in Table 1respectively.

Table 1.

Comparison of the leaching test values with aqueous concentration threshold by USEPA and the Malaysian industrial effluent regulations: a. Lead (Pb), (b) Zinc (Zn), (c) Copper (Cu) and (d) Arsenic (As).

Heavy metals in fly ash (FA), bottom ash (BA) Pb Zn Cu As
Concentration of heavy metals (mg/L) The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) FA 0.902 ± 0.01 0.216 ± 0.01 0.028 ± 0.00 15.117 ± 0.23
BA 0.673 ± 0.01 0.149 ± 0.00 0.027 ± 0.00 14.655 ± 0.29
FA + BA 1.026 ± 0.01 0.196 ± 0.02 0.033 ± 0.00 18.546 ± 0.03
The synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) FA 0.908 ± 0.00 0.219 ± 0.00 0.030 ± 0.00 15.227 ± 0.11
BA 0.683 ± 0.01 0.151 ± 0.00 0.028 ± 0.00 14.636 ± 0.07
FA + BA 1.012 ± 0.01 0.189 ± 0.03 0.033 ± 0.00 18.605 ± 0.17

Permissible limit for metals Hazardous waste screening criteriaa (mg/L) 100.0 None None 100.0
Hazardous waste limitb (mg/L) 5.0 None None 5.0

Limits for Sewage and industrial effluentsc Standard A 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.05
Standard B 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.1

National standards for drinking water quality (mg/L)d 0.05 3.0 1.0 0.01

Descriptions In compliance with permissible limits for metalsab In compliance with limit for sewage and industrial effluentc and national standardsd In compliance with permissible limits for metalsb

In TCLP test, the leached concentrations of Pb were 0.902 ± 0.01 mg/L (FA), 0.673 ± 0.01 mg/L (BA), and 1.026 ± 0.01 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached Zn concentrations were 0.216 ± 0.01 mg/L (FA), 0.149 ± 0.00 mg/L (BA), and 0.196 ± 0.02 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached Cu concentrations were 0.028 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA), 0.272 ± 0.00 mg/L (BA), and 0.033 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached As concentrations were 15.117 ± 0.23 mg/L (FA), 14.655 ± 0.29 mg/L (BA), and 18.546 ± 0.03 mg/L (FA + BA).

In SPLP test, the leached concentrations of Pb were 0.908 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA), 0.683 ± 0.01 mg/L (BA), and 1.012 ± 0.01 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached concentrations of Zn were 0.219 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA), 0.151 ± 0.00 mg/L (BA), and 0.189 ± 0.03 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached Cu concentrations were 0.030 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA), 0.028 ± 0.00 mg/L (BA), and 0.033 ± 0.00 mg/L (FA + BA). The leached As concentrations were 15.227 ± 0.11 mg/L (FA), 14.636 ± 0.07 mg/L (BA), and 18.605 ± 0.17 mg/L (FA + BA).

The H+ ion in aqueous acidic solution will remove the cations (heavy metals) from their binding sites (FA and BA) causing cations leaching due to the reduction of cation exchange capacity (CEC) [9]. Cation exchange capacity is a capacity of cations to be attached on matrix surfaces [10]. Therefore, concentration of heavy metals in the matrix system were found in both TCLP and SPLP tests.

The dataset on leaching properties of coal ashes presented is essentially important. Overall, the ranges of concentration in FA, BA and FA + BA for Pb complied with permissible limits for metalsab: Hazardous waste criteriaa (mg/L) and TCLP hazardous waste limitsb (mg/L). The ranges of concentration for As complied with permissible limits for metala: Hazardous waste criteriaa (mg/L). The concentration for Zn and Cu complied with limit for industrial effluent (Standard A and Standard B) and national drinking water quality standards. The evaluation on leaching of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu, and As) in FA, BA and FA + BA showed that As leached the most whilst indicating of possible contamination from As. The leached of heavy metals fluxes were Cu < Zn < Pb < As. Nevertheless, the leachability of mixed samples of FA+BA was found to be higher than those of pure FA or BA in case of Pb, Cu and As. Therefore, the mixed of these samples may expose threat to the environment. Further investigation to understand the physico-chemical and leaching properties of mixed samples are highly recommended.

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

The leaching properties of coal ashes (FA, BA, and FA + BA, 1:1, v/v of dry weight) was determined via two USEPA standard procedures namely toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) and synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) [11,12].

The TCLP is to determine the leaching properties of organic and inorganic substance in liquid, solid and multiphase wastes simulating landfill leachate (Method 1311) [11]. Two extraction fluid namely extraction fluid No.1 (5.7 mL glacial acetic acid (CH3CH2OOH) in 500 mL of deionized water, additional of 64.3 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and diluted to 1 L, pH: 4.93 ± 0.05) and extraction fluid No. 2 (5.7 mL CH3CH2OOH diluted to 1 L with deionized water, pH: 2.88 ± 0.05) were used.

The sample ratio to extraction fluid was equivalent to 1:20 (v/v). Samples (5.0 g of each FA, BA and FA + BA) were transferred into a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 96.5 mL of deionized water and stirred for 5 min. The extraction fluid No. 1 would be added if observed pH was below 5. If the pH was more than 5.0, 3.5 mL 1N HCl would be added. Next, the solutions were heated to 50 °C for 10 min, left to room temperature with agitation at 30 rpm for 18 h.

The synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) is to determine the leaching properties of organic and inorganic compounds in liquids, soils, and wastes simulating acid rain from airborne nitric and sulfuric oxides (Method 1312) [12]. Following the same procedure as TCLP, sulfuric acids were used in the extraction fluid instead of acetic acid (5.7 mL sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in 500 mL of deionized water, additional of 64.3 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and diluted to 1 L, pH: 4.20 ± 0.05).

The solutions (contained FA, BA and FA + BA) were filtered using glass fiber filters (0.7 μm) for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry analysis (SHIMADZU, AA-6800). The furnace method assisted with acethylene gas was used for Pb, Cu, and Zn quantification. The graphite method assisted with acethylene gas was used for As quantification.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia for providing financial supports (BOLD2025 Grant (10436494/B/2019060)) for this study. Authors would like to thank Mr Muhammad Nur Hafiz Bin Mohd Saadon (CE094616) from College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional; Miss Yusyawati Binti Yahaya from Centralized analytical laboratory, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (yusyawati@utp.edu.my) for the technical supports.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105843.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (324B, xml)

References

  • 1.Mohd Kamal N.L., Beddu S., Syamsir A., Mohammad D., Itam Z., Hamid Z.A.A., Abd Manan T.S.B. Immobilization of heavy metals for building materials in the construction industry – an overview. Mater. Today-Proc. 2019;17:787–791. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Malakahmad A., Abd Manan T.S.B., Sivapalan S. Detection methods of carcinogens in estuaries: a review. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2015;10:601–619. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V10-N5-601-619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khan T., Mustafa M.R., Isa M.H., Abd Manan T.S.B., Ho Y.C., Lim J.W., Yusof N.Z. Artificial neural network (ANN) for modelling adsorption of Lead (Pb (II)) from aqueous solution. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228:426. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.T. Khan, M.H. Isa, M.R. MustafaArtificial neural network approach for modeling of Cd (II) adsorption from aqueous solution by incinerated rice husk carbon, in: N.A. Wan Abdullah Zawawi (Eds.), Engineering Challenges for Sustainable Future: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering (ICCOEE 2016, Malaysia, 15-17 Aug 2016), CRC Press/Balkema, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America, 2016, pp. 229-233.
  • 5.European Parliament and Council, European Parliament and Council European (2008) waste framework directive 2008/98/EC. OJ. 2008;312:3–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W) EPA530-K-05-012. USEPA; United States of America: 2005. Introduction to hazardous waste identification (40 CFR Parts 261) [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malaysian Government . Vol. 434. Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad, Kuala Lumpur, P.U. (A); 2009. pp. 4010–4059. (Environmental Quality Sewage & Industrial Effluent Regulations 1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Engineering Services Division, Ministry of Health; Malaysia: 2016. Drinking Water Quality Surveillance Programme.http://kmam.moh.gov.my/public-user/drinking-water-quality-standard.html accessed 3 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.S.A. Zheng, X. Zheng, C. Chen, Leaching behavior of heavy metals and transformation of their speciation in polluted soil receiving simulated acid rain. PLoS One7(2012) e49664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Fernandes M.M., Baeyens B., Beaucaire C. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy; Sawston, Cambridge, United Kingdom: 2012. Radionuclide Retention at Mineral–Water Interfaces in the Natural Environment. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)Method 1311 The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/1311.pdf, 2019 (accessed 1 July 2019).
  • 12.United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)Method 1312 The Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/1312.pdf, 2019 (accessed 1 July 2019).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (324B, xml)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES