Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jun 28;9(1):53–64. doi: 10.1111/andr.12836

Worse progression of COVID‐19 in men: Is testosterone a key factor?

Vito A Giagulli 1,2,, Edoardo Guastamacchia 1, Thea Magrone 3, Emilio Jirillo 3, Giuseppe Lisco 4, Giovanni De Pergola 5, Vincenzo Triggiani 1
PMCID: PMC7307026  PMID: 32524732

Abstract

Background

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) disease 2019 (COVID‐19) seems to have a worse clinical course among infected men compared with women, thus highlighting concerns about gender predisposition to serious prognosis. Therefore, androgens, particularly testosterone (T), could be suspected as playing a critical role in driving this excess of risk. However, gonadal function in critically ill men is actually unknown, mainly because serum T concentration is not routinely measured in clinical practice, even more in this clinical context.

Objective

To overview on possible mechanisms by which serum T levels could affect the progression of COVID‐19 in men.

Methods

Authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, and institutional websites for medical subject headings terms and free text words referred to “SARS‐CoV‐2,” “COVID‐19,” “testosterone,” “male hypogonadism,” “gender” “immune system,” “obesity,” “thrombosis” until May 19th 2020.

Results

T, co‐regulating the expression of angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 and transmembrane protease serine 2 in host cells, may facilitate SARS‐CoV‐2 internalization. Instead, low serum T levels may predispose to endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis and defective immune response, leading to both impaired viral clearance and systemic inflammation. Obesity, one of the leading causes of severe prognosis in infected patients, is strictly associated with functional hypogonadism, and may consistently strengthen the aforementioned alterations, ultimately predisposing to serious respiratory and systemic consequences.

Discussion and conclusion

T in comparison to estrogen may predispose men to a widespread COVID‐19 infection. Low serum levels of T, which should be supposed to characterize the hormonal milieu in seriously ill individuals, may predispose men, especially elderly men, to poor prognosis or death. Further studies are needed to confirm these pathophysiological assumptions and to promptly identify adequate therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: COVID‐19, gender, male hypogonadism, obesity, testosterone, thrombosis

1. INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is a novel and highly transmissible infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). 1 , 2 Due to human‐to‐human transmission, the disease spreads consistently among countries, 3 , 4 leading the World Health Organization Director‐General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to declare the state of pandemic in March 11th 2020 when 118,000 worldwide confirmed cases were detected in 114 different countries. 5 A wide range of clinical presentations has been reported among patients with COVID‐19, mostly with mild to moderate symptoms (80%). 6 However, both severe and critical clinical course may occur especially in elderly patients with underlying cardiometabolic comorbidities, possibly contributing to a high case fatality rate in this cluster of patients. 7 Worldwide, more than 320,000 deaths have been detected among patients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2, of these, more than 90,000 in the United States; 35,000 in the United Kingdom; 32,000 in Italy; 28,000 in France and Spain (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html). Case fatality rate consistently differs across countries and different hypotheses have been formulated to explain this issue, including strategies for detecting cases and contacts, age, and comorbidity of affected patients, availability of hospital beds especially in intensive care units. 7 , 8 , 9 A clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients at admission has been recently proposed and validated. 10 Despite the calculator tool includes general, anamnestic, clinical, and laboratory parameters normally affecting the prognosis in patients with COVID‐19, gender has not been considered among these variables. As matter of fact, men exhibit poor prognosis or die more frequently than women even regardless of age. 11 In fact, epidemiological data reported male sex among deceased patients as high as 73% in China, 12 59% in South Korea, 13 and 70% in Italy, 7 thus highlighting that worldwide case fatality rates were almost three times higher in men than in women. In most of the cases, deaths are due to pulmonary distress, acute cardiovascular and renal injury, sepsis and multiorgan failure. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Emerging data suggest that thromboembolic events, such as venous thromboembolism and disseminated intravascular coagulation, are becoming a consistent cause of decease, mostly in critically ill patiens. 19 , 20 Finally, serious immune dysregulation with consequent systemic inflammation has been recognized in seriously ill COVID‐19 patients. 21 Of note, life expectancy in men is currently shorter compared with that described for women and this difference might be attributable to a faster aging of men in comparison to women. 22 Several mechanisms are involved to explain this phenomenon, such as genetic, metabolism, hormonal balance, defense against oxidative stress, and immune system function. 23 Disease awareness and long‐term adherence to specific treatments are usually lower in men than women and may also contribute to a different mortality rate between the two genders. 24 , 25 Despite some changes over time, tobacco exposure remains usually prerogative of male sex and this attitude may influence both the prevalence and outcomes especially for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in this cluster of patients. 26 Apart from these general considerations which normally explain a slightly greater male susceptibility to aging‐related outcomes, specific factors may influence a poor prognosis in COVID‐19‐infected men. Some hypotheses have been yet formulated for explaining gender difference in fatality rate, particularly emphasizing the role of testosterone (T). 27 Since serum T concentration is not routinely measured in patients with COVID‐19, gonadal functional assessment in these men is still unknown. However, it could be speculated that COVID‐19 patients with worse clinical course, being usually elderly with one or more underlying chronic diseases, are more likely to have hypogonadism. 28 On the other hand, angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is essential for SARS‐CoV‐2 entry into host cells, is also expressed in spermatogonia, Leydig, and Sertoli cells. 29 , 30 Taken together, these results suggest that SARS‐CoV‐2 may infect testicles, potentially affecting T secretion also in younger patients. Considering that low serum T levels induce detrimental effects on cardiovascular system and predispose to impaired immune response, endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, respectively, 28 herein, we will overview on possible putative mechanisms by which circulating T might affect the prognosis in men with COVID‐19 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of putative mechanisms leading to poor prognosis or death in men and their relationship with circulating levels of serum T (for details and abbreviations see the text)

Conditions predisposing to worse prognosis Hypothesized mechanisms Supposed serum T circulating levels
SARS‐CoV‐2 internalization in host's cells Increased expression of TMPRSS2 Normal
Increased expression of ACE2 Low
Baseline patients’ characteristics Aging Low
Cardiovascular diseases Low
Pulmonary diseases Low
Renal diseases Normal/low
Diabetes mellitus Normal/low
Obesity Normal/low
Direct testicle involvement (primary hypogonadism) SARS‐CoV‐2 infection Low (high gonadotropins)
Thrombotic risk Endothelial dysfunction Low
Thromboxane A2‐activated platelets Normal
Platelet activation Low
Won Willebrand Factor and P‐selectin Normal/low
Decreased tissue plasminogen activator activity Low
Raised plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 activity Low
Immune system dysfunction Cytokines storm (IL‐6, IL‐1beta, TNF‐alpha) Low
Decline in IL‐10 levels and blunted T‐reg response Low
Impaired B‐cells activity Normal

2. METHODS

Authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, and Institutional websites for medical subject headings terms and free text words referred to “SARS‐CoV‐2,” “COVID‐19,” “testosterone,” “male hypogonadism,” “gender” “immune system,” “obesity,” “thrombosis” until May 19th 2020. The research focalized upon subgroup of infected patients which exhibited poor prognosis, including hospitalization and intensive care requirement or death. Only articles written in English were considered.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Testosterone and viral entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 into human cells

ACE2, a carboxypeptidase involved in the cleavage of angiotensin I and angiotensin II, allows SARS‐CoV‐2 entry into host's cells, thus mediating both the transmissibility and severity of COVID‐19 infection among humans. 31 ACE2 is normally expressed at the level of lung, 32 oral mucosa, 33 intestine, 34 cardiovascular system, 35 brain, 36 pancreatic islets, 37 testicle, 29 kidney, 38 and immune cells. 39 Moreover, it plays an essential role in the regulation of pulmonary homeostasis, while protecting against pulmonary injury. 40 Indeed, low levels of ACE2 have been described in severe acute and chronic pulmonary diseases. 41 Conversely, chronic diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes, and some medications may increase the level of ACE2 expression in different tissues. 41 , 42 This last condition is believed to facilitate the internalization of SARS‐CoV‐2 into host cells in several systems, thus, contributing to worsen the prognosis in COVID‐19, 41 , 42 even if this emergent issue remains still debated. 43 In animal model, ACE2 expression in pulmonary and bronchial epithelium dramatically decreased with aging more in male rats than female. 44 Human ACE2 locus gene is localized on X chromosome (Xp22), in an area where genes are reported to escape from X‐inactivation and this finding may explain a greater expression of ACE2 in women than men. 45 However, sex differences in ACE2 expression/activity may be also attributable to hormonal factors, as observed in rat females in which estrogens enhanced the enzyme's expression. 46

Transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) is a human enzyme encoded by the TMPRSS2 gene whose function is currently unknown in humans but there is evidence that it plays a crucial role in metastasizing prostate cancer. 47 TMPRSS2 was found to be able to cleave hemagglutinin viral antigen, thus, resulting essential for viral infectivity during pandemic A H1N1 influenza and A H7N9 influenza. 48 Unfortunately, TMPRSS2 also cleaves SARS‐CoV‐2 spike antigen at the level of S1/S2 and S2 sites and is crucial for allowing viral fusion with host cells membrane. 49 TMPRSS2 gene expression is enhanced by androgens, including T and consequently its expression may be greater in men than in women triggering in the former a greater viral entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 into target host cells compared with the latter. 50 Given these findings, it should be hypothesized that the physiological difference in circulating androgen levels between genders could predispose men to a more extensive pulmonary or systemic exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2 once the infection has occurred. On the other hand, a lower ACE2 tissue expression in men may predispose them to a wider lung and systemic damage in course of COVID‐19 infection compared with women. In addition, lower levels of serum T, often observed in elderly patients and associated with chronic diseases, may concur to generate a poor baseline health status, particularly at the level of cardiovascular system, thus facilitating a worse clinical course of the infection in this cluster of patients. 51

3.2. Testosterone and cardiovascular system in COVID‐19

Cardiovascular involvement in COVID‐19 is typically observed in elderly patients and in those affected by chronic diseases, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and active neoplasm, and in those with high levels of systemic inflammation. 18 Acute myocardial injury has been observed in several infected patients, particularly in those requiring intensive care due to a serious clinical course. 52 Other patterns of myocardial damage are currently known to potentially affect the prognosis in infected patients, even including acute coronary events, left ventricle dysfunction, and cardiac arrhythmias. 53 The supposed mechanisms explaining these findings are likely attributable to a direct myocardial involvement, detrimental effects of systemic inflammation, raised myocardial demand‐to‐supply ratio, pro‐thrombotic imbalance, and electrolytes disorders (mainly hypokalemia due to renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system interference by SARS‐CoV‐2), respectively. 53 Endothelium is essential to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis, considering that it secretes a wide range of substances normally involved in the regulation of vascular tone, cellular adhesion and antithrombosis, vessel's wall inflammation and smooth muscle cell proliferation. 54 Loss of physiological balance among these substances consequently leads to endothelial inflammation, predisposes to thrombosis and atherosclerosis, while facilitating the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). 55 Endothelial dysfunction has been particularly observed in elderly, smokers and in patients with arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus contributing to the onset and progression of CVD. 56 SARS‐CoV‐2 is able to infect endothelial cells, because of a marked ACE2 expression also at this level. Endothelial inflammation and dysfunction and apoptosis are usually described in infected patients, thus, characterizing both macro‐ and microvascular damage in COVID‐19. 57 Both the incidence and prevalence of CVD are more frequently reported in men than women, leading to concerns about possible detrimental cardiovascular effects of T. 58 , 59 In fact, CVD remain the main causes of mortality in men, even if low rather than normal or elevated levels of serum T are frequently observed in patients with underlying CVD. 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64

Elderly men, who often display hypogonadism, are more prone to the progression of atherosclerosis. 65 Indeed, normal levels of T are necessary for maintaining an optimal lipid metabolism and glucose control, as well as for reducing blood pressure, left ventricle mass, waist circumference, and circulating concentration of inflammatory cytokines. 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 In addition, T is a rapid‐onset coronary vasodilator due to its ability to block calcium channel and promotes potassium channel opening. 69 Furthermore, T may improve systolic output and contribute to the amelioration of cardiorespiratory fitness with physical exercise. 69 Low levels of both total and free T are responsible for a relevant raise in all‐cause mortality mostly due to cardiovascular events, 70 , 71 , 72 especially in elderly patients. 73 Considering these data, men with baseline low circulating levels of serum T are expected to have poor cardiovascular health status, which may contribute to increase cardiovascular risk also in COVID‐19.

3.3. Testosterone and thromboembolic risk in COVID‐19

A severe alveolar epithelial and endothelial damage in seriously ill COIVD‐19 patients has been reported. As a result, tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 accumulate in lung, leading to both fibrin deposition and hypofibrinolytic state, thus predisposing to thrombosis. 74 Some of the cases of severe COVID‐19 may be complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation, which is a pro‐thrombotic condition, predisposing to a high risk of venous, and arterial thromboembolism. 75 , 76 Patients with poor prognosis usually display higher levels of fibrinogen and D‐dimers, longer prothrombin and partial activated thrombin time, and are more prone to develop thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation. 77 Thrombocytopenia is frequently observed in infected patients and should be considered as a clinical biomarker of poor prognosis. 78 To avoid harmful clinical outcomes, recent recommendations advice to administer thromboprophylaxis or full therapeutic intensity anticoagulation, if such an indication is needed in COVID‐19 inpatients. 75

Endothelial dysfunction, which is described in seriously ill patients, promotes the release of pro‐thrombotic factors, including von Willebrand factor and P‐selectin and could predispose to thrombosis and thromboembolism in this clinical setting. 79 Additionally, systemic inflammation may occur particularly in predisposed patients leading to a progressive “thromboinflammatory” syndrome with consequent disseminated microvasculature involvement, multiorgan failure, or death. 80 So far, the published cases of inpatients with COVID‐19 complicated by intravascular thrombosis have shown a higher frequency in men, especially among non‐survivor patients. 19 , 20 Despite these thrombotic events may be elicited by an exaggerated host immune response, a wide range of other predisposing factor may be involved, such as a prolonged immobilization due to hospitalization, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiometabolic risk factors. 77 In this clinical scenario, sexual hormones may also play a role in the regulation of hemostasis and thrombosis homeostasis. Indeed, T has been shown to increase the expression of thromboxane A2 receptors at the level of platelets, thus, enhancing platelet activation and aggregation in humans. 81 On the other hand, serum T levels were found to be negatively associated with platelet activation and reactivity as suggested by the results of a recently published ex vivo study. 82  T enhances both the synthesis and secretion of endothelial nitric oxide, 83 which is a potent inhibitor of platelet activation. 84 In addition, megakaryocytes and platelets contain both estrogen and androgen receptors, consequently their activities are also directly influenced by sexual hormones. 85 This finding may explain gender differences in platelet activation and thrombotic diseases. In women, platelet function is enhanced by estrogen, thus fluctuating according to the ovarian cycle, and being more efficient in premenopausal than climacteric state as for protecting against an excessive bleeding during menstrual phase. 86 , 87 Thus, it could be speculated that T may protect men in comparison to women against and excessive platelet activation, but when a status of hypogonadism occurs, such as in elderly and comorbid patients, this effect declines. Exactly, hypogonadal men exhibit higher value of the mean platelet volume which is a biomarker of platelet activation, and is an independent risk factor for CVD. 88 Glueck et al found that serum T concentrations positively correlated with tissue plasminogen activator activity and were inversely associated with plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 activity and fibrinogen, 89 thus suggesting a direct anti‐thrombotic role of this androgen on coagulation and fibrinolysis. 90  T is critically involved in maintaining platelet and coagulative homeostasis. Therefore, hypogonadism may contribute to increase the risk of new onset thrombotic events in COVID‐19 and this concern should be taking into account especially in elderly and comorbid men.

3.4. Testosterone and immune system dysfunction in COVID‐19

Both innate and adaptive systems are essential for promptly contrasting virus replication, facilitating virus clearance, stimulating tissue repair, and developing persistent defense. 91 Seriously ill COVID‐19 patients exhibit an exaggerate neutrophil and alveolar macrophage response and a marked peripheral lymphocyte dysfunction. 92 , 93 Both number and function of B and T cell are impaired, 94 , 95 and a hypercoagulability state has also been observed. The greater the magnitude of these hematological and biochemical alterations, then, the greater the severity of the prognosis. 77 , 96 SARS‐CoV‐2 may infect T cells through receptor‐dependent, spike protein‐mediated membrane fusion but it is still unclear whether the virus replicates in lymphocytes and the infection leads to apoptosis of T cells. 97 However, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and Natural Killer cells are remarkably reduced in SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected patients. 98 Specifically, CD8+ T cells tend to be an independent predictor for COVID‐19 severity and treatment efficacy. 98 Immunological dysfunction may not allow an easy control of viral infection, thus, fostering viral dissemination with a consequent systemic spread of the disease. 92 In addition, a secondary hemophagocytic lympho‐histiocytosis with hyperinflammatory syndrome, characterized by a fulminant and lethal hypercytokinemia and multiorgan failure, has been recognized as a harmful prognostic factor. 99 Several and specific interleukins (ILs), including IL‐2, IL‐6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)–alpha, and chemokines are markedly up‐regulated in patients displaying a serious pulmonary involvement or requiring intensive care with a poor long‐term prognosis. 100 , 101 Despite the fact that the so‐called “immunocompetence handicap hypothesis” in men still remains debated, 102 differences in circulating sexual hormones levels may condition a gender‐related response to infections. 103 In fact, T exhibits modulating effects on the immune system that may potentially predispose men to different clinical course and prognosis in case of infectious diseases. 104 According to Foo et al, T exerts immunosuppressive effects. 104 In animal models, T suppresses the production of IL‐6, IL‐1beta, and TNF‐alpha, and enhances the production of IL‐10. 105 Moreover, T suppresses T‐helper (h) 17 cells and enhances regulatory T cells (T‐reg) differentiation, thus attenuating inflammatory immune response. 106  T facilitates both the production and secretion of higher T‐h 1 to T‐h 2 cytokine ratio by stimulated T cells and reduces B‐cell proliferation and humoral response. 107 On the other hand, T insufficiency may exactly revert these immunological features, consequently predisposing to systemic inflammation with possible concerns for elderly and comorbid patients. 108 Women compared with men generate a more robust antibody response against viral (influenza) vaccine. 109  T in comparison to estradiol seems to reduce both eosinophil and neutrophil recruitment, also impairing T‐h 2 CD4+ activation and IgE production. 110 Dendritic cell presentation is enhanced in women and this phenomenon should be attributable to genetic (X‐linked) and hormonal (estrogens) mechanisms which are able to stimulate more Toll‐like receptor‐7 and ‐9 expression and interferon‐alpha secretion. 111 , 112 Due to these findings, men exhibit a baseline immunologic condition, which could predispose them to poor prognosis in COVID‐19. To date, neither vaccine nor specific treatment received approval for COVID‐19, whereas promising results have been obtained in critically ill patients treated with convalescent plasma. 113 Since the growing evidences from bedside led to positive results, several clinical trials have been started and are currently ongoing to methodologically test both the safety and effectiveness of convalescent and hyperimmune plasma in this clinical setting. 114 , 115 , 116 These therapeutic aspects emphasized the concept that a blunted antibody response (particularly IgG) may precipitate a severe clinical course in COVID‐19 patients. In a recently published observational study, 331 inpatients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection were enrolled (127 men and 204 women) displaying that men were more prone to develop poor prognosis compared to women, also recovering less frequently from the infection (55.6% vs. 63%). 117 Interestingly, authors found some significant differences in humoral response between genders. Particularly in seriously ill patients’ subgroup, a delayed peak of antibody response with a lower generation of effective IgG was found in men compared to women, thus confirming that a blunted antibody response in men was associated with worse prognosis. 117 These findings are actually attributable to sexual hormones influence on B‐cells proliferation, survival, and activity which are enhanced by estrogen and impaired by T, respectively. 118 Indeed, estrogen alfa‐ and beta‐receptors are both expressed on B‐cell membrane, where estrogens upregulate the expression of several genes involved in B‐cells activation and survival, such as CD22, SHP‐1, and Bcl‐2. 119 Contrariwise, T exerts opposite effect on B cells, thus impairing immunoglobulin generation and antibody response such as in case of viral infection. 120 , 121 In addition, the lysophosphatidylserine receptor (GPR174), codified by the homonymous X‐linked gene, is widely expressed on lymphocyte cell membranes, including T‐reg and B cells, and its activity seems to be enhanced in women and reduced in men. 122 Specifically, GPR174 is known to regulate macrophage polarization and proinflammatory cytokine secretion, predisposing to a marked immune response normally observed in Gram‐negative induced septic shock. 123 Indeed, GPR174‐deficient mice were more resistant to the development of septic shock, and were more prone to control cytokine storm particularly due to IL‐6 and TNF‐alpha. 123 In addition, GPR174 has been recognized to modulates B‐cell migration in response to the chemokine CCL21 in mice. 124 B‐cell migration in response to CCL21 is more effective in female than male B cells, and is furtherly impaired in absence of T. Thus, these data confirmed that T may negatively influence the baseline antibody response in male and T deficiency may accentuate the gender dimorphism in B cells efficiency. 124 Very interestingly, gonadotropins may play a role in immune system regulation. Luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone (LHRH) is secreted by hypothalamus (but also mammary gland, gonadal, placenta, spleen, thymus), and normally regulates pulses of pituitary gonadotropins release finally controlling gonadal steroidogenesis and gametogenesis. 125 However, LHRH receptors have been found on lymphocytes membrane and are involved in normal thymocyte maturation. High circulating levels of LHRH, as observed in neonatally castrated animals, lead to a relevant increase in CD4+ T cells. 126 On the other hand, a LHRH antagonist‐induced tertiary hypogonadism seemed to significantly reduce both the number and activity of circulating B cells and CD8+ T cells thus blunting humoral immune response against circulating antigens. 127 Placental gonadotropins are also involved in immune response regulation, and should be considered a relevant determinant in immunotolerance during pregnancy. 128 Particularly, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) demonstrated to attract and activate T‐reg at the level of trophoblast in early stages of pregnancy, therefore orchestrating a phenomenon which is thought to be essential for immune tolerance toward embryo. 129 Moreover, hCG positively regulates the generation of IL‐10 secreting B cells, 130 which normally regulate immune tolerance during infectious diseases. 131 In addition, alpha‐fetoprotein demonstrated to drive B cells to apoptosis, acting as another defensive mechanism against an exaggerate humoral response. 130 Luteinizing hormone in mice and hCG in humans seem to enhance T‐reg activity, and impair CD4+ T‐cell differentiation in sense of T‐h 1. 132 Given these considerations, it should be noted that gonadotropins may play a role in modulating immune response, also beyond the effect of sexual steroids. Since male hypogonadism may affect the prognosis in COVID‐19 infected patients, it should not be excluded that a different etiology of this clinical condition may differentiate the prognosis, too. Nevertheless, no studies assessing the gonadal status of affected men have been currently carried out; hence, this issue remains unclear. Interestingly, Iglesias et al analyzed the prevalence of hypogonadism among 150 geriatric inpatients (aged ≥ 65 years) hospitalized for acute illness, considering serum T levels < 200 ng/dL as a cutoff point. 133 Hypogonadism was found in 80 (53%) patients; of these, 43.7% were hypergonadotropic, 40% were normogonadotropic, and 15% were hypogonadotropic. 133 The leading causes of hospitalization among hypogonadal men were congestive heart failure and respiratory tract infection, and 12 out of 13 patients who died during hospitalization had hypogonadism. 133 Similar results were observed also in a cohort of male hemodialysis patients, with a median levels of serum T of 11.7 nmol/L, in whom hypogonadism was found to be associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for infective diseases (HR 2.12) and all‐cause mortality (HR 2.26) regardless of gonadotropins levels. 134 Men with human immunodeficiency virus usually display a wide range of endocrine imbalances, including hypogonadism which furtherly aggravate health status in these individuals. 135 Despite the leading cause of hypogonadism is actually attributable to a primary (hypergonadotropic) hypogonadism, some of them displayed a hypothalamic or tertiary form. 136 Even in this case, the role of serum T and gonadotropins on infective risk burden is not well understood.

Aging is related with immune senescence and should also be considered as a risk factor for poor prognosis in case of infectious diseases. 137 Moreover, age‐related comorbidities significantly contribute to impair immune system efficiency. 138 From a pathophysiological point of view, age‐related mitochondrial dysfunction is responsible for a low energy production that impairs CD8+ T‐cell activation and proliferation. 139 Of note, these cells are essentially involved in cell‐mediated immune responses which assume a critical role against viral infections and may expose elderly patients to poor prognosis in this clinical condition. 139 Aging also affects innate immune response, as suggested by a decline in the efficiency of dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils. 140 , 141 , 142 In conclusion, immune response against viral infections may be impaired by aging, particularly in men and a consequent weak immune response should be double‐sided in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. In fact, normal levels of serum T generally predispose men to a dampened immune response, 143 leading to systemic viral spreading with potentially harmful clinical consequences on one side, but protecting them against cytokine dysregulation (the so‐called cytokine storm) on the other side. Differently, male hypogonadism could furtherly impair immune response against viral infection but it is thought to favor rather than contrast harmful cytokine dysregulation in course of COVID‐19.

3.5. Focus on male obesity

Obesity is a common underlying comorbidity in COVID‐19 inpatients, and its prevalence has been reported as high as 42% in this cluster of patients. 144 Despite first reports did not mention the overweight/obesity syndrome as an important risk factor for respiratory complications and poor prognosis in patients with COVID‐19, 15 , 17 , 145 further findings confirmed that those individuals with elevated body mass index are more likely to require intensive care and are at greater risk of death. 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 Particularly, body mass index > 35 kg/m2 has been usually observed in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation 150 and should be considered as a risk factor for admission to acute (OR 1.8) and critical (OR 3.6) care also in younger patients (aged < 60 years). 151 Pathophysiological mechanisms possibly related with poor prognosis in this cluster of patients are not completely understood but may be attributable to a greater inflammatory background, as similarly observed in insulin‐resistant and diabetic patients. 152 However, considering that ACE2 is also expressed on adipose cells, a larger extension of adipose tissue in obese patients may reliably increase the number of available receptors leading to a much greater systemic response to SARS‐CoV‐2. 153 Obese patients are also at greater risk of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and sedentary lifestyle, which are considered as predisposing factors for worse prognosis in response to acute and chronic diseases, including COVID‐19. 154 Abdominal obesity usually leads to a low cardiorespiratory reserve and systemic inflammatory dysfunction which predispose to a worse prognosis in COVID‐19. 155 Moreover, obesity is typically associated with a decreased pulmonary ventilation or obstructive sleep apnea which both predispose to a baseline low levels of blood oxygenation and consequently to worse clinical course in case of acute infectious respiratory diseases. 156 Visceral obesity is also a risk factor for both the development and progression of congestive heart failure especially in elderly patients. 157 Since abdominal obesity is more frequently observed in men in comparison to women due to hormonal background, 158 it could be expected that “belly fat” predisposes men to poor prognosis in COVID‐19. To support this hypothesis, it should be considered that visceral obesity per se fosters higher level of pro‐thrombotic circulating factors, thus, predisposing to thrombosis. 159 Moreover, obesity and male hypogonadism are both associated with one other. 160 The so‐called “male obesity‐related secondary hypogonadism” is frequently found in obese men and is characterized by a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis, 161 which includes adipose tissue dysfunction, T‐to‐estrogen shunt, impaired release of hypothalamic gonadotropin‐releasing hormone, insulin resistance and obstructive sleep apnea. 162 Of note, adipose tissue dysfunction and male hypogonadism, even if subclinical, are associated with higher circulating levels of cytokine (IL‐6, IL‐1, and TNF‐alpha), endothelial dysfunction, 163 and amplified thrombosis risk, possibly prompting to detrimental clinical consequences in case of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. 108 High levels of prostaglandin E2 have been found in visceral adipose tissue collected from obese men, contributing to both detrimental (inflammation and fibrosis) and adaptive mechanism of compensation (adaptive thermogenesis and lipolysis). 164 Of these, prostaglandin E2 induces the expression of aromatase gene, 165 and T‐to‐estrogen shunt usually observed in obese men adipose tissue is attributable to this phenomenon. 166 In male mice visceral adipose tissue, an increased aromatase activity locally raises estrogen levels which seem to reduce local inflammation, ameliorate insulin sensitivity hence contrasting the development of systemic diseases. 166 Body mass index positively correlates with circulating levels of estrogen and negatively correlate with circulating T also in humans. 167 Aromatase gene expression is enhanced in men adipose tissue, and is positively related with body weight and levels of systemic inflammation, therefore confirming same results observed in animal models. 168 However, aromatase has been detected in a wide range of other tissues, and its expression is differently modulated in each of these districts. Consequently, the magnitude of an enhanced aromatase activity at the level of adipose tissue (as observed in visceral obesity) on the systemic T‐to‐estrogen shunt remains questionable. Nonetheless, despite same controversial, low T‐to‐estrogen ratio seems to increase cardiovascular risk, as observed in elderly and in patients with underlying CVD. 169 , 170 In an observational study, elderly men with high levels of circulating estrogen (top quintile: >34 pg/mL) compared to those with low levels of circulating estrogen (lower quintile: <14 pg/mL) displayed a twofold risk of stroke (relative hazard 2.2, P < .0001). 171 Indeed, high levels of estrogen irrespective to serum T concentration are believed to prime a thrombophilia state in men leading to thrombosis, particularly in predisposed patients. 172 , 173 In conclusion, male obesity should be considered a relevant risk factor for poor prognosis in COVID‐19. It may affect baseline respiratory function, thus increasing the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement once the infection occurred; increase the number of baseline comorbidities, consequently predisposing to poor prognosis or death as certificated by epidemiological studies; fosters hormonal imbalance (decline in circulating serum T and increase in serum estrogen concentration) which are involved in the fine regulation of immune system and coagulative homeostasis in case of infection, and predispose men to poor effective immune response, cytokine dysregulation; endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis.

4. PERSPECTIVE HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

Gender difference in prognosis and fatality rate is a relevant clinical issue in COVID‐19 pandemic. Further investigations are needed to analyze this biological phenomenon for providing appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic tools. A different biological and clinical background, which generally predisposes men to a lower life expectancy than women, could potentially condition these clinical outcomes in case of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, especially among elderly. Despite gender difference in adverse events and life‐threatening outcomes was long believed to be paradigmatically ascribable to a higher serum T concentration in men than in women, normal levels of serum T are essential for sustaining men's health. Contrariwise, low levels of serum T, which may be associated with aging and obesity and other chronic diseases, lead to systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and increased platelet activity, predisposing to thrombosis and thromboembolism and promoting atherosclerosis and CVD. In men with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome or in those affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other background pulmonary disease, a higher prevalence of hypogonadism has been found. 174 In these clinical settings, men with lower level of T are more prone to develop pulmonary and systemic inflammation and worse respiratory and general parameters. Moreover, T predisposes men to less effective immune response against infectious agents and male hypogonadism may trigger a detrimental cytokine dysfunction, including high circulating levels of IL‐6, TNF‐alpha, and IL‐1beta, responsible for poor prognosis in COVID‐19. 101 Additionally, androgens enhance TMPRSS2 expression, thus, leading to a baseline predisposition to a wider SARS‐CoV‐2 spread into man body than that occurring in women. This mechanism could explain a greater male susceptibility to a more serious clinical course in COVID‐19. Of note, SARS‐CoV‐2 could infect testicle, potentially affecting T secretion also in young men and directly inducing (primary hypogonadism) or aggravating a preexistent condition of hypogonadism in already predisposed men. The magnitude of this phenomenon as well as the importance of gonadotropins’ levels, which varies among the different forms of hypogonadisms in affected patients (primary versus secondary or tertiary hypogonadism or mixed forms), remains still debated and the potential implications on the prognosis in the course of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection require further investigation for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

VAG conceived the review. All researchers performed database search, drafted the manuscript, read, provided feedback, and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The present review was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Discussed data extracted from published papers.

Giagulli VA, Guastamacchia E, Magrone T, et al. Worse progression of COVID‐19 in men: Is testosterone a key factor? Andrology.2021;9:53–64. 10.1111/andr.12836

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zhou P, Yang X‐L, Wang X‐G, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270‐273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome‐related coronavirus: classifying 2019‐nCoV and naming it SARS‐CoV‐2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(4):536‐544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li C, Ji F, Wang L, et al. Asymptomatic and human‐to‐human transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 in a 2‐family cluster, Xuzhou, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):1626–1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Deng S‐Q, Peng H‐J. Characteristics of and public health responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. WHO Director‐General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID‐19 ‐ 11 March 2020 . https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who‐director‐general‐s‐opening‐remarks‐at‐the‐media‐briefing‐on‐covid‐19‐11‐march‐2020. Accessed April 25, 2020.
  • 6. Jin Y, Yang H, Ji W, et al. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of COVID‐19. Viruses. 2020;12(4):372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case‐fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID‐19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1775–1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hu Y, Deng H, Huang L, Xia L, Zhou X. Letters to the editor analysis of characteristics in death patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia without underlying diseases. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(5):752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Boccia S, Ricciardi W, Ioannidis JPA. What other countries can learn from Italy during the COVID‐19 pandemic. JAMA Int Med. 2020. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, et al. Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. JAMA Int Med. 2020.e202033. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Xie J, Tong Z, Guan X, Du B, Qiu H. Clinical characteristics of patients who died of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(4):e205619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen T, Wu DI, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091. 10.1136/bmj.m1295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Diseases KS of I , Diseases KS of PI, Epidemiology KS of, Therapy KS for A, Prevention KS for HIC and, Prevention KC for DC and. Report on the epidemiological features of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid‐19) outbreak in the republic of Korea from January 19 to March 2, 2020. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(10):e112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054‐1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang D, Hu BO, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus‐Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061‐1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory‐Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID‐NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):458‐464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1094‐1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(4):844‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sarzi‐Puttini P, Giorgi V, Sirotti S, et al. COVID‐19, cytokines and immunosuppression: what can we learn from severe acute respiratory syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38(2):337‐342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lenart P, Kuruczova D, Joshi PK, Bienertová‐Vašků J. Male mortality rates mirror mortality rates of older females. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Seifarth JE, McGowan CL, Milne KJ. Sex and life expectancy. Gend Med. 2012;9(6):390‐401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cutler JA, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Thom T, Fields LE, Roccella EJ. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2008;52(5):818‐827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. EUGenMed Cardiovascular Clinical Study Group , Regitz‐Zagrosek V, Oertelt‐Prigione S, et al. Gender in cardiovascular diseases: impact on clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(1):24‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Higgins ST, Kurti AN, Redner R, et al. A literature review on prevalence of gender differences and intersections with other vulnerabilities to tobacco use in the United States, 2004–2014. Prev Med (Baltim). 2015;80:89‐100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. La Vignera S , Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Torre F, Aversa A, Calogero AE. Sex‐specific SARS‐CoV‐2 mortality: among hormone‐modulated ACE2 expression, risk of venous thromboembolism and hypovitaminosis D. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pozzilli P, Lenzi A. Testosterone, a key hormone in the context of COVID‐19 pandemic. Metabolism. 2020;108:154252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Douglas GC, O’Bryan MK, Hedger MP, et al. The novel Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme (ACE) homolog, ACE2, is selectively expressed by adult leydig cells of the testis. Endocrinology. 2004;145(10):4703‐4711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wang Z, Xu X. scRNA‐seq profiling of human testes reveals the presence of the ACE2 receptor, a target for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in spermatogonia, leydig and sertoli cells. Cells. 2020;9(4):920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Walls AC, Park Y‐J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, Mcguire AT, Correspondence DV. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181(2):281‐292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis M, Lely A, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2004;203(2):631‐637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019‐nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vuille‐dit‐Bille RN, Camargo SM, Emmenegger L, et al. Human intestine luminal ACE2 and amino acid transporter expression increased by ACE‐inhibitors. Amino Acids. 2015;47(4):693‐705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chen L, Li X, Chen M, Feng Y, Xiong C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. Cardiovas Res. 2020;116(6):1097‐1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Alenina N, Bader M. ACE2 in brain physiology and pathophysiology: evidence from transgenic animal models. Neurochem Res. 2019;44(6):1323‐1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Batlle D, Soler MJ, Ye M. ACE2 and diabetes: ACE of ACEs? Diabetes. 2010;59(12):2994‐2996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Soler MJ, Wysocki J, Batlle D. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 and the kidney. Exp Physiol Artic. 2008;93(5):549‐556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bernstein KE, Khan Z, Giani JF, Cao DY, Bernstein EA, Shen XZ. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(5):325‐336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nicholls J, Peiris M. Good ACE, bad ACE do battle in lung injury. SARS. Nat Med. 2005;11(8):821‐822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Pal R, Bhansali A. COVID‐19, Diabetes Mellitus and ACE2: The conundrum. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162:108132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID‐19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gracia‐Ramos AE. Is the ACE2 overexpression a risk factor for COVID‐19 infection? Arch Med Res. 2020;51(4):345‐346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Xudong X, Junzhu C, Xingxiang W, Furong Z, Yanrong L. Age‐ and gender‐related difference of ACE2 expression in rat lung. Life Sci. 2006;78(19):2166‐2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Fan R, Mao S‐Q, Gu T‐L, et al. Preliminary analysis of the association between methylation of the ACE2 promoter and essential hypertension. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15(6):3905‐3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Liu J, Ji H, Zheng W, et al. Sex differences in renal angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity are 17β‐oestradiol‐dependent and sex chromosome‐independent. Biol Sex Differ. 2010;1(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wilson S, Greer B, Hooper J, et al. The membrane‐anchored serine protease, TMPRSS2, activates PAR‐2 in prostate cancer cells. Biochem J. 2005;388(3):967‐972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Cheng Z, Zhou J, Kai‐Wang To K, et al. Identification of TMPRSS2 as a Susceptibility Gene for Severe 2009 Pandemic A(H1N1) Influenza and A(H7N9) Influenza. J Infect Dis. 2015;208(12):1214‐1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hoffmann M, Kleine‐Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271‐280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Asselta R, Paraboschi EM, Mantovani A, Duga S. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 variants and expression as candidates to sex and country differences in COVID‐19 severity in Italy. medRxiv. 2020. 10.1101/2020.03.30.20047878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Elagizi A, Köhler TS, Lavie CJ. Testosterone and cardiovascular health. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(1):83‐100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID‐19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(5):259‐260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bansal M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID‐19. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2020;14(3):247‐250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction. Circulation. 2007;115(10):1285‐1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Esper RJ, Nordaby RA, Vilariño JO, Paragano A, Cacharrón JL, Machado RA. Endothelial dysfunction: A comprehensive appraisal. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2006;5:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hadi HAR, Carr CS, Al SJ. Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2005;1(3):183‐198. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID‐19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417‐1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Levy D, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular risks: New insights from Framingham. Am Heart J. 1988;116(1 pt 2):266‐272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Liu PY, Death AK, Handelsman DJ. Androgens and cardiovascular disease. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(3):313‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kelly DM, Jones TH. Testosterone: A vascular hormone in health and disease. J Endocrinol. 2013;217(3):r47‐r71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kalin MF, Zumoff B. Sex hormones and coronary disease: a review of the clinical studies. Steroids. 1990;55(8):330‐352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Nettleship JE, Jones RD, Channer KS, Jones TH. Testosterone and coronary artery disease. Front Horm Res. 2009;37:91‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Traish AM, Guay A, Feeley R, Saad F. The dark side of testosterone deficiency: I. metabolic syndrome and erectile dysfunction. J Androl. 2009;30(1):10‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Giagulli VA, Guastamacchia E, De PG, Iacoviello M, Triggiani V. Testosterone deficiency in male: a risk factor for heart failure. Endocrine Metab Immune Disord Targets. 2013;13(1):92‐99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Hak AE, Witteman JCM, de Jong FH, Geerlings MI, Hofman A, Pols HAP. Low levels of endogenous androgens increase the risk of atherosclerosis in elderly men: the Rotterdam study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(8):3632‐3639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Haffner SM, Mykkäinen L, Valdez RA, Katz MS. Relationship of sex hormones to lipids and lipoproteins in nondiabetic men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77(6):1610‐1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Svartberg J, von Mühlen D, Schirmer H, Barrett‐Connor E, Sundfjord J, Jorde R. Association of endogenous testosterone with blood pressure and left ventricular mass in men. The Tromsø study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(1):65‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Malkin CJ, Pugh PJ, Jones RD, Kapoor D, Channer KS, Jones TH. The effect of testosterone replacement on endogenous inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(7):3313‐3318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Jones TH, Kelly D. Randomized controlled trials – mechanistic studies of testosterone and the cardiovascular system. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(2):120‐130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Khaw K‐T, Dowsett M, Folkerd E, et al. Endogenous testosterone and mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in men: European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk (EPIC‐Norfolk) prospective population study. Circulation. 2007;116(23):2694‐2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Vikan T, Schirmer H, Njølstad I, Svartberg J. Endogenous sex hormones and the prospective association with cardiovascular disease and mortality in men: The Tromsø Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(3):435‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Adelborg K, Rasmussen TB, Nørrelund H, Layton JB, Sørensen HT, Christiansen CF. Cardiovascular outcomes and all‐cause mortality following measurement of endogenous testosterone levels. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(11):1757‐1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Laughlin GA, Barrett‐Connor E, Bergstrom J. Low serum testosterone and mortality in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):68‐75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Whyte CS, Morrow GB, Mitchell JL, Chowdary P, Mutch NJ. Fibrinolytic abnormalities in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and versatility of thrombolytic drugs to treat COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020. 10.1111/jth.14872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kollias A, Kyriakoulis KG, Dimakakos E, Poulakou G, Stergiou GS, Syrigos K. Thromboembolic risk and anticoagulant therapy in COVID‐19 patients: emerging evidence and call for action. Br J Haematol. 2020;189(5):846‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Zhou B, She J, Wang Y, Ma X. Venous thrombosis and arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities in a very severe patient with 2019 novel coronavirus disease: a case report. J Thromb Thrombol. 2020;50(1):229‐232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Terpos E, Ntanasis‐Stathopoulos I, Elalamy I, et al. Hematological findings and complications of COVID‐19. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(7):834–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Yang X, Yang Q, Wang Y, et al. Thrombocytopenia and its association with mortality in patients with COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(6):1469‐1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Poredos P, Jezovnik MK. Endothelial dysfunction and venous thrombosis. Angiology. 2018;69(7):564‐567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ciceri F, Beretta L, Scandroglio AM, et al. Microvascular COVID‐19 lung vessels obstructive thromboinflammatory syndrome (MicroCLOTS): an atypical acute respiratory distress syndrome working hypothesis. Crit Care Resusc. 2020. PMID: 32294809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ajayi AAL, Mathur R, Halushka PV. Testosterone increases human platelet thromboxane A2 receptor density and aggregation responses. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2742‐2747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Karolczak K, Konieczna L, Kostka T, et al. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone reduce platelet activation and reactivity in older men and women. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(5):902‐929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Torres‐Estay V, Carreño DV, San Francisco IF, Sotomayor P, Godoy AS, Smith GJ. Androgen receptor in human endothelial cells. J Endocrinol. 2015;224(3):R131‐R137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Wang GR, Zhu Y, Halushka PV, Lincoln TM, Mendelsohn ME. Mechanism of platelet inhibition by nitric oxide: In vivo phosphorylation of thromboxane receptor by cyclic GMP‐dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(9):4888‐4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Khetawat G, Faraday N, Nealen ML, et al. Human megakaryocytes and platelets contain the estrogen receptor β and androgen receptor (AR): testosterone regulates AR expression. Blood. 2000;95(7):2289‐2296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Berlin G, Hammar M, Tapper L, Tynngård N. Effects of age, gender and menstrual cycle on platelet function assessed by impedance aggregometry. Platelets. 2019;30(4):473‐479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Aldrighi JM, Oliveira RLS, D'amico É, et al. Platelet activation status decreases after menopause. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005;20(5):249‐257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Carlioglu A, Durmaz SA, Kibar YI, Ozturk Y, Tay A. Mean platelet volume in a patient with male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: The relationship between low testosterone, metabolic syndrome, impaired fasting glucose and cardiovascular risk. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015;26(7):811‐815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Glueck CJ, Glueck HI, Stroop D, Speirs J, Hamer T, Tracy T. Endogenous testosterone, fibrinolysis, and coronary heart disease risk in hyperlipidemic men. J Lab Clin Med. 1993;122(4):412‐420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Bonithon‐Kopp C, Scarabin PY, Bara L, Castanier M, Jacqueson A, Roger M. Relationship between sex hormones and haemostatic factors in healthy middle‐aged men. Atherosclerosis. 1988;71(1):71‐76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):424‐432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Li H, Liu L, Zhang D, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. Lancet. 2020;395(10235):1517‐1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Magrone T, Magrone M, Jirillo E. Focus on receptors for coronaviruses with special reference to angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 as a potential drug target ‐ a perspective. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020. 10.2174/1871530320666200427112902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Wan S, Yi Q, Fan S, et al. Characteristics of lymphocyte subsets and cytokines in peripheral blood of 123 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). medRxiv. 2020. 10.1101/2020.02.10.20021832 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Diao B, Wang C, Tan Y, et al. Reduction and Functional Exhaustion of T Cells in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Front Immunol. 2020. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Tan CW, Low JGH, Wong WH, Chua YY, Goh SL, Ng HJ. Critically Ill COVID‐19 Infected Patients Exhibit Increased Clot Waveform Analysis Parameters Consistent with Hypercoagulability. Am J Hematol. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Wang X, Xu W, Hu G, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 infects T lymphocytes through its spike protein‐mediated membrane fusion. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;9:1‐3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Wang F, Nie J, Wang H, et al. Characteristics of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subset Alteration in COVID‐19. Pneumonia. 2020;221(11):1762‐1769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID‐19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033‐1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. McGonagle D, Sharif K, O’Regan A, Bridgewood C. Interleukin‐6 use in COVID‐19 pneumonia related macrophage activation syndrome. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(6):102537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Nowak J, Pawłowski B, Borkowska B, Augustyniak D, Drulis‐Kawa Z. No evidence for the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in male humans. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Di Florio DN , Sin J, Coronado MJ, Atwal PS, Fairweather DL. Sex differences in inflammation, redox biology, mitochondria and autoimmunity. Redox Biol. 2020;31:101482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Foo YZ, Nakagawa S, Rhodes G, Simmons LW. The effects of sex hormones on immune function: a meta‐analysis. Biol Rev. 2017;92(1):551‐571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Norata GD, Tibolla G, Seccomandi PM, Poletti A, Catapano AL. Dihydrotestosterone decreases tumor necrosis factor‐α and lipopolysaccharide‐induced inflammatory response in human endothelial cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):546‐554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Roved J, Westerdahl H, Hasselquist D. Sex differences in immune responses: Hormonal effects, antagonistic selection, and evolutionary consequences. Horm Behav. 2017;88:95‐105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Giron‐Gonzalez JA, Moral FJ, Elvira J, et al. Consistent production of a higher T(H)1:T(H)2 cytokine ratio by stimulated T cells in men compared with women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143(1):31‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Mohamad N‐V, Wong SK, Wan Hasan WN, et al. The relationship between circulating testosterone and inflammatory cytokines in men. Aging Male. 2019;22(2):129‐140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Engler RJM, Nelson MR, Klote MM, et al. Half‐ vs full‐dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (2004–2005): Age, dose, and sex effects on immune responses. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2405‐2414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Fuseini H, Yung JA, Cephus JY, et al. Testosterone decreases house dust mite‐induced type 2 and IL‐17A–mediated airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2018;201(7):1843‐1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Laffont S, Rouquié N, Azar P, et al. X‐Chromosome complement and estrogen receptor signaling independently contribute to the enhanced TLR7‐mediated IFN‐α production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells from women. J Immunol. 2014;193(11):5444‐5452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Seillet C, Laffont S, Trémollières F, et al. The TLR‐mediated response of plasmacytoid dendritic cells is positively regulated by estradiol in vivo through cell‐intrinsic estrogen receptor α signaling. Blood. 2012;119(2):454‐464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, et al. Treatment of 5 critically Ill patients with COVID‐19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1582‐1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Valk SJ, Piechotta V, Chai KL, et al. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19: a rapid review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5:CD013600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. de Alwis R, Chen S, Gan ES, Ooi EE. Impact of immune enhancement on Covid‐19 polyclonal hyperimmune globulin therapy and vaccine development. EBioMedicine. 2020;55:102768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Sheridan C. Convalescent serum lines up as first‐choice treatment for coronavirus. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(6):655‐658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Zeng F, Dai C, Cai P, et al. A comparison study of SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody between male and female COVID‐19 patients: A possible reason underlying different outcome between sex. J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.25989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Ruggierii A, Anticoli S, Dambrosio A, Giordani L, Mora M. The influence of sex and gender on immunity, infection and vaccination. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(2):198‐204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Grimaldi CM, Cleary J, Dagtas AS, Moussai D, Diamond B. Estrogen alters thresholds for B cell apoptosis and activation. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(12):1625‐1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Ghosh S, Klein RS. Sex drives dimorphic immune responses to viral infections. J Immunol. 2017;198(5):1782‐1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):626‐638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Barnes MJ, Li CM, Xu Y, An J, Huang Y, Cyster JG. The lysophosphatidylserine receptor GPR174 constrains regulatory T cell development and function. J Exp Med. 2015;212(7):1011‐1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Qiu D, Chu X, Hua L, et al. Gpr174‐deficient regulatory T cells decrease cytokine storm in septic mice. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(3):1‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Zhao R, Chen X, Ma W, et al. A GPR174–CCL21 module imparts sexual dimorphism to humoral immunity. Nature. 2020;577(7790):416‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Lee VHY, Lee LTO, Chow BKC. Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone: regulation of the GnRH gene. FEBS J. 2008;275(22):5458‐5478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Wilder RL. Neuroendocrine‐immune system interactions and autoimmunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1995;13(1):307‐338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Mann DR, Ansari AA, Akinbami MA, Wallen K, Gould KG, McClure HM. Neonatal treatment with luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone analogs alters peripheral lymphocyte subsets and cellular and humorally mediated immune responses in juvenile and adult male monkeys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(2):292‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Schumacher A, Heinze K, Witte J, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin as a central regulator of pregnancy immune tolerance. J Immunol. 2013;190(6):2650‐2658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Schumacher A, Brachwitz N, Sohr S, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin attracts regulatory T cells into the fetal‐maternal interface during early human pregnancy. J Immunol. 2009;182(9):5488‐5497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Fettke F, Schumacher A, Canellada A, et al. Maternal and fetal mechanisms of B cell regulation during pregnancy: Human chorionic gonadotropin stimulates B cells to produce IL‐10 while alpha‐fetoprotein drives them into apoptosis. Front Immunol. 2016;7:495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Hilgenberg E, Shen P, Dang VD, Ries S, Sakwa I, Fillatreau S. Interleukin‐10‐producing B cells and the regulation of immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;380:69‐92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Polese B, Gridelet V, Araklioti E, Martens H, Hauterive SP, Geenen V. The endocrine milieu and CD4 T‐lymphocyte polarization during pregnancy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Iglesias P, Prado F, Macías MC, et al. Hypogonadism in aged hospitalized male patients: Prevalence and clinical outcome. J Endocrinol Invest. 2014;37(2):135‐141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Nakashima A, Ohkido I, Yokoyama K, Mafune A, Urashima M, Yokoo T. Associations between low serum testosterone and all‐cause mortality and infection‐related hospitalization in male hemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study. Kidney Int Reports. 2017;2(6):1160‐1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Rochira V, Diazzi C, Santi D, et al. Low testosterone is associated with poor health status in men with human immunodeficiency virus infection: A retrospective study. Andrology. 2015;3(2):298‐308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Brockmeyer NH, Kreuter A, Bader A, Seemann U, Reimann G. Prevalence of endocrine dysfunction in HIV‐infected men. Horm Res. 2000;54:294‐295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Magrone T, Magrone M, Russo MA, Jirillo E. Peripheral immunosenescence and central neuroinflammation: a dangerous liaison. A dietary approach. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020. 10.2174/1871530320666200406123734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Castle SC, Uyemura K, Rafi A, Akande O, Makinodan T. Comorbidity is a better predictor of impaired immunity than chronological age in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(9):1565‐1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Akbar AN, Henson SM, Lanna A. Senescence of T Lymphocytes: Implications for Enhancing Human Immunity. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(12):866‐876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Linehan E, Fitzgerald D. Ageing and the immune system: focus on macrophages. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2015;5(1):14‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Agrawal A, Agrawal S, Gupta S. Role of dendritic cells in inflammation and loss of tolerance in the elderly. Front Immunol. 2017;8:896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Wenisch C, Patruta S, Daxböck F, Krause R, Hörl W. Effect of age on human neutrophil function. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;67(1):40‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Uchiyama M, Jin X, Zhang Q, Amano A, Watanabe T, Niimi M. Induction of regulatory CD4 + cells and prolongation of survival of fully allogeneic murine cardiac grafts by danazol. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(4):1067‐1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID‐19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al. Covid‐19 in critically Ill patients in the seattle region — Case series. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2012‐2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Dietz W, Santos‐Burgoa C. Obesity and its implications for COVID‐19 mortality. Obesity. 2020;28(6):1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Ryan DH, Ravussin E, Heymsfield S. COVID 19 and the Patient with Obesity – The Editors Speak Out. Obesity. 2020;28(5):847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Jose RJ, Manuel A. Does COVID‐19 disprove the obesity paradox in ARDS? Obesity. 2020;28(6):1007. 10.1002/oby.22835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1966. 10.1136/bmj.m1966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Lighter J, Phillips M, Hochman S, et al. Obesity in patients younger than 60 years is a risk factor for Covid‐19 hospital admission. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Zhou T, Hu Z, Yang S, Sun L, Yu Z, Wang G. Role of Adaptive and Innate Immunity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:7457269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Kassir R. Risk of COVID‐19 for patients with obesity. Obes Rev. 2020;21:e13034. 10.1111/obr.13034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Carter SJ, Baranauskas MN, Fly AD. Considerations for obesity, vitamin D, and physical activity amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic. Obesity. 2020. 10.1002/oby.22838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Sattar N, McInnes IB, McMurray JJV. Obesity a risk factor for severe covid‐19 infection: multiple potential mechanisms. Circulation. 2020. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Dixon AE, Peters U. The effect of obesity on lung function. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(9):755‐767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. De Pergola G, Nardecchia A, Giagulli VA, et al. Obesity and heart failure. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2013;13(1):51‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Giagulli VA, Castellana M, Pelusi C, Triggiani V. Androgens, Body Composition, and Their Metabolism Based on Sex. Front Horm Res. 2019;53:18‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. De Pergola G, Pannacciulli N. Coagulation and fibrinolysis abnormalities in obesity. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(10):899‐904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Seyam O, Gandhi J, Joshi G, Smith NL, Khan SA. Obesity’s role in secondary male hypogonadism: a review of pathophysiology and management issues. SN Compr Clin Med. 2019;1(6):408‐418. [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Giagulli VA, Kaufman JM, Vermeulen A. Pathogenesis of the decreased androgen levels in obese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(4):997‐1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Fernandez CJ, Chacko EC, Pappachan JM. Male obesity‐related secondary hypogonadism – pathophysiology, clinical implications and Management. Eur Endocrinol. 2019;15(2):83‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Corona G, Bianchini S, Sforza A, Vignozzi L, Maggi M. Hypogonadism as a possible link between metabolic diseases and erectile dysfunction in aging men. Hormones. 2015;14(4):569‐578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. García‐Alonso V, Titos E, Alcaraz‐Quiles J, et al. Prostaglandin E2 exerts multiple regulatory actions on human obese adipose tissue remodeling, inflammation, adaptive thermogenesis and lipolysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Simpson ER, Davis SR. Minireview: aromatase and the regulation of estrogen biosynthesis—some new perspectives. Endocrinology. 2001;142(11):4589‐4594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Ohlsson C, Hammarstedt A, Vandenput L, et al. Increased adipose tissue aromatase activity improves insulin sensitivity and reduces adipose tissue inflammation in male mice. Am J Physiol Metab. 2017;313(4):E450‐E462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Lee H‐K, Lee JK, Cho B. The role of androgen in the adipose tissue of males. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(2):136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Polari L, Yatkin E, Martínez Chacón MG, et al. Weight gain and inflammation regulate aromatase expression in male adipose tissue, as evidenced by reporter gene activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;412:123‐130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Gong Y, Xiao H, Li C, et al. Elevated T/E2 ratio is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease in elderly men. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. van Koeverden ID, de Bakker M, Haitjema S, et al. Testosterone to oestradiol ratio reflects systemic and plaque inflammation and predicts future cardiovascular events in men with severe atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(2):453‐462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Abbott RD, Launer LJ, Rodriguez BL, et al. Serum estradiol and risk of stroke in elderly men. Neurology. 2007;68(8):563‐568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Glueck CJ, Richardson‐Royer C, Schultz R, et al. Testosterone, thrombophilia, and thrombosis. Clin Appl Thromb. 2014;20(1):22‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Phillips GB, Pinkernell BH, Jing T‐Y. The association of hyperestrogenemia with coronary thrombosis in men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(11):1383‐1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Atlantis E, Fahey P, Cochrane B, Wittert G, Smith S. Endogenous testosterone level and testosterone supplementation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Andrology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES