Abstract
Low-Density polyethylene (PE) sheets are used as passive samplers for aquatic environmental monitoring to measure the freely dissolved concentration (Cfree) of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs). Freely dissolved HOCs in water will partition into the PE until a thermodynamic equilibrium is achieved; that is, the HOC’s activity in the passive sampler is the same as its activity in the surrounding environment. One way to evaluate the equilibrium status or estimate the uptake kinetics is by using performance reference compounds (PRCs). A fractional equilibrium (feq) can be determined for target HOCs, under the assumption that PRC desorption from the passive sampler occurs at the same rate as the unlabeled target HOCs. However, few investigations have evaluated how effectively and accurately PRCs estimate target contaminant Cfree under in situ conditions. In this study, PE passive samplers were pre-loaded with six, 13C-labelled PCBs as PRCs, and deployed in New Bedford Harbor, MA, USA and were collected after 30, 56, 99, and 129-day deployments. Using this unique temporal sampling design, PRC results from each deployment were fit to a diffusion model to estimate the Cfree of 27 PCB congeners and compare the results between the different deployment times. Smaller PCBs had variable concentrations over the four deployments while mid-molecular weight PCBs had consistent Cfree measurements for all deployments (relative standard deviation < 20%). High molecular weight PCBs had the largest Cfree estimates after 30 days, these estimates and their standard deviations decreased with longer deployment times. These findings suggest when targeting PCBs with more than six chlorines or contaminants with a log KOW ≥ 6.5, a deployment time longer than 30 days may be prudent.
Introduction
Passive sampling use has increased for scientific and regulatory applications (Lydy et al. 2014; Booij et al. 2016) due to the range of data it can provide about targeted contaminants and how this information can be used by environmental managers to make informed decisions. Useful information gleaned from passive samplers about targeted contaminants includes the likelihood of bioaccumulation by aquatic organisms (Joyce et al. 2016); transfer between environmental phases (e.g., sediments to water to atmosphere (Khairy et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2016; McDonough et al. 2016); and freely dissolved concentrations (Cfree) – a critical value for understanding exposure and bioavailability (Mayer et al. 2014). Low-density polyethylene (PE) is a commonly applied passive sampler due to its wide availability, low expense, structural simplicity, and relative ease of use (Adams et al. 2007; Lohmann et al. 2012). The most straightforward way to measure Cfree is to allow the contaminants to reach a thermodynamic equilibrium with the passive sampler and surrounding water. Cfree can then be calculated from a passive sampler relatively simply according to Equation 1. The Cfree of a targeted contaminant at equilibrium between the sampling environment and polyethylene (PE) can be calculated from:
| [1] |
where, KPEW is the PE-water partition coefficient for a specific contaminant and CPE∞ is the contaminant’s concentration in the PE passive sampler at equilibrium. As dictated by Equation 1, accurate estimates of Cfree are contingent on an accurate measurement of CPE∞ and KPEW values. Often, during in situ deployments it is unclear if a thermodynamic equilibrium was attained, and for more hydrophobic compounds, it may take several months to years to attain equilibrium (Fernandez et al. 2012, Ghosh et al. 2014). In these instances, the concentration in the sampler can be expressed as CPEt where the ‘t’ signifies the deployment duration and mass transfer calculations can be used to estimate Cfree.
Various methods use performance reference compounds (PRCs) to model the mass transfer kinetics which allows measurement of CPEt to estimate CPE∞ or Cfree directly (Booij, Sleiderink, and Smedes 1998; Booij and Smedes 2010; Fernandez, Harvey, and Gschwend 2009; Tcaciuc, Apell, and Gschwend 2015; Thompson, Hsieh, and Luthy 2015; Vrana and Schüürmann 2002; Shen and Reible 2019). Often, a PRC is an isotopically labeled direct analog of a target compound and the two compounds are assumed to have isotropic uptake and release kinetics. Using physiochemical characteristics of the PRCs and target compounds the corrections for target compounds without a direct isotopic analog PRC can be interpolated from the available PRC data. The PRCs are preloaded into the passive sampler prior to deployment and have similar partitioning and kinetic characteristics to target compounds but are also analytically distinguishable and not present in the sampled environment. The fraction of a PRC retained in the PE over the deployment (fret) allows for the calculation of site- and compound-specific sampling rates or estimation of the size of the water boundary layer (WBL) such that a fractional equilibrium (feq) can be calculated for several target contaminants without directly analogous PRCs based on log KOW or molecular volume. PRCs are of particular value in field deployments of passive samplers (i.e., in situ) where equilibrium cannot be assumed or determined in contrast to laboratory, or ex situ deployments where conditions can be controlled to favor achieving equilibrium. Several studies have used PRCs in water column and sediment in situ deployments to estimate Cfree (Burgess et al. 2015; Perron et al. 2013a, 2013b; Fernandez, Harvey, and Gschwend 2009; Fernandez et al. 2012; Estoppey et al. 2014; Tomaszewski and Luthy 2008; Apell and Gschwend 2016; Smedes 2007; Joyce et al. 2015; Apell et al. 2018; Sanders et al. 2018). In a previous study, we suggested that using a sampling rate approach (Booij and Smedes 2010) or a diffusion-based approach (Thompson, Hsieh, and Luthy 2015) to determine Cfree often resulted in statistically indistinguishable results in a field deployment (Joyce and Burgess 2018). In this investigation, we used PRCs to populate a diffusion-based model to estimate feq and calculated CPE∞. This model is based on the governing equations:
| (2) |
| (3) |
Where, DPE and DW are the diffusivities (mm2/s) of each HOC through the polyethylene and water, respectively, x is the distance from the center of the polyethylene, l is half the thickness of the polyethylene (mm), and b is the thickness of the WBL (mm). A WBL for each passive sampler can be estimated by solving the system of equations described above using results from the PRCs. Using that information, fractional equilibrium information can be estimated for all targeted PCBs. More details about the derivatization of this model can be found in Thompson et al. (2015) and Fernandez et al. (2012).
Uncertainty in Cfree can arise from either the KPEW estimates used or from the CPE∞ value measured or calculated from the deployment. Cross validation experiments have shown that Cfree values derived using different passive sampling mediums like silicone rubber, semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMDs), and PE often perform similarly and yield Cfree estimates that are within a factor of two (Jacquet et al. 2014; Fernandez et al. 2012; Schmidt et al. 2017). These studies provide confidence in the partitioning coefficients (KPEW) that are available for PE. In this study, KPEWs for PCB congeners were derived from KOW values obtained by Hawker and Connell, (Hawker and Connell 1988) using the correlation recommended by Ghosh et al. (Ghosh et al. 2014). Uncertainty in CPE∞ often derives from analytical error associated with CPEt, which is relatively small compared to that of KPEW values. Using PRCs introduces additional measurements and estimates that contribute to the uncertainty of CPE∞ estimates. Often in situ, PRC-based estimates of CPE∞ are validated by comparing equilibrium estimated Cfree values with synonymous ex situ deployments where equilibrium had been confirmed (Apell and Gschwend 2016; Gschwend et al. 2011; Fernandez et al. 2014; Schmidt et al. 2017). In general, the estimated Cfree values when equilibrium had been achieved or when it had been modeled using PRC data agreed within a factor of two. These types of empirical comparisons are often performed in sediment pore water as the kinetics are more difficult to model in that system and similar experiments in surface waters would require very large grab samples and may still be inconclusive due to relatively high detection limits. Further, similar investigations with surface waters are very challenging because of contaminant depletion under ex situ conditions.
Another way to assess the performance of PRCs is to conduct a temporal study, in which pre-loaded passive samplers are exposed to contaminated water over increasing time intervals ideally until all targeted contaminants have reached equilibrium. The Cfree estimated using CPEt and PRC results can then be compared to measured CPE∞ or CPE∞ extrapolated from the uptake curve. Recent temporal studies using PRC loaded passive samplers in quiescent sediments showed mixed results and caution the use of PRCs in field applications (Bao et al. 2016; Choi et al. 2016). To the best of our knowledge this type of study has not been conducted in the surface waters where the sampling kinetics are more easily modeled.
The primary objective of this study was to better understand (1) the accuracy of the PRC-based estimates of CPE∞ as a function of the fractional equilibrium attained and (2) the reproducibility of Cfree estimates based on the different fractions of equilibrium attained. To evaluate the accuracy of PRC-based measurements of CPE∞, the temporal experimental design outlined above was performed in a series of water column deployments at three stations in the U.S. EPA Superfund site in New Bedford Harbor (MA, USA). The target contaminants were a suite of 27 PCBs contaminating the sediments of the harbor. PE passive samplers were used in the deployments along with a compliment of six 13C-labelled PCB PRCs. PE samplers were collected after 30, 56, 99, and 129-day deployments. This unique temporal study may yield better insight on optimal deployment times for water column passive sampling in similar environmental conditions.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Low-density PE sheeting (Ace Hardware, Oak Brook, IL, USA; 25.4 μm thick) was cut into strips (8cm × 50cm, ~ 0.5 to 3 g) and pre-cleaned in dichloromethane (DCM; 1 day), methanol (MeOH; 2 days), and stored in milli-Q water (18.3 MΩ) prior to loading PRCs. PRCs were loaded into cleaned PE in 2 L of a 4:1 MeOH:water spiking solution containing 13C-CB congeners: 8, 28, 52, 101, 138, and 180 for 28 days while gently mixing on an orbital shaker following Booij et al. (2002). The nominal concentration of each PRC in the spiking solution is given in SI Table S1. A piece of PE (~5 cm) was cut from each sampler to determine the PRC CPE0 (i.e., concentrations in the passive sampler prior to the deployment) and stored at −20°C in the dark until further work up. PRC-loaded PE strips were then dried and woven onto stainless steel wire (Malin Co., Brookpark, OH; 20 gauge) and shaped into rings then stored at −20 °C or on ice in the dark until deployment.
All non-labeled chlorinated biphenyls (CBs): 8, 18, 28, 44, 52, 66, 70, 77, 81, 99, 101, 105, 110, 114, 118, 123, 126, 138, 153, 156, 157, 167, 169, 170, 180, 189, and 206 were purchased from Ultra Scientific (N. Kingston, RI, USA) and 13C labeled CBs: 8, 9, 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 180, and 188 were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Andover, MA, USA). ACS/Pesticide grade DCM and MeOH, were purchased from Honeywell (Muskegon, MI, USA) and used without further purification. Ultra-resi analyzed grade hexane (95% n-hexane) was purchased from J.T. Baker (Center Valley, PA, USA). Concentrated sulfuric acid (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) was used to clean-up extracts when necessary.
Field Studies
PE passive samplers were deployed in the water column in June of 2015 at two stations in New Bedford Harbor (NBH 2 and NBH4) and one station in Buzzards Bay (NBH5) (SI Figure S1). Generally, at low-energy contaminated sites, like New Bedford Harbor, the water column Cfree is not expected to change substantially during deployment unless high energy events occur (e.g., storms, dredging). During this investigation, portions of New Bedford Harbor were undergoing remedial dredging (see Results and Discussion). Samplers were deployed in triplicate at each station. Four PE samplers were deployed on each mooring at each station at approximately one meter above the sediment. NBH2 is the most contaminated station followed by NBH4 with NBH5 being the least contaminated site (Pruell et al. 1990). One sampler was retrieved from each mooring at each of the four collection dates: 30, 56, 99, and 129 days. One non-PRC-loaded PE sampler and one PRC-loaded PE sampler were exposed to the atmosphere during deployment and recovery operations at all three stations to serve as a travel/field blank. Upon retrieval, PE samplers were placed in glass jars on ice during transit. Samplers were rinsed, wiped clean of visible fouling, and gently dried with laboratory tissue upon return to laboratory. Dried samplers were then stored in glass vials at −20°C in the dark until extraction.
Sample Processing and Analysis
Extraction details followed Joyce and Burgess (2018). Briefly, PE and blanks were spiked with recovery standards 13C-PCBs: 9, 118, and 188 (12.5 μL; 20 μg/mL) and extracted by mixing on an orbital shaker in DCM (~90mL, overnight two times). Combined extracts were concentrated using a TurboVap (Zymark, Hopkinton, MA, USA; 5–10 psi, 35°C), exchanged to hexane, concentrated down to 1 mL, and spiked with internal standard, CB198 (12.5 μL; 20 μg/mL). When particularly dark in color indicating the presence of natural organic matter, extracts were cleaned-up by acid washing with concentrated H2SO4 (200 μL). Extracts were stored in amber glass, crimp cap vials at −20 °C in the dark until analysis. Samples were analyzed using an Agilent 7890A digital gas chromatograph coupled to a 5975 mass selective detector (Santa Clara, CA) operating in the electron ionization (70 eV) and selected ion-monitoring mode (GC-EI/MS).
Data Analysis and Quality Control
Chromatograms were integrated using ChemStation (E.02.00.493; Santa Clara, CA, USA). PE extracts were quantified using internal standards on a seven-point calibration curve. No target contaminants were detected in control PE blanks. Twelve of the 5-cm, pre-cut pieces per thickness were extracted to determine CPRC0. For each PRC, initial measurements of the PRCs in the subsamples of passive sampler (i.e., CPRC0) agreed within 15%. Recoveries for 13C-CB9, 118, and 188 were 52±4, 87±2, and 74±4, respectively. All targeted PCB congeners were corrected for surrogate recovery according to SI Table S2. Using Equation 1, Cfree was calculated using a compound specific KPEW (SI Table S2). To simplify data interpretation, six congeners from different chlorination levels (i.e., CB8 (2 Cl); CB28 (3 Cl); CB52 (4 Cl); CB101 (5 Cl); CB138 (6 Cl); CB180 (7 Cl)), are discussed in detail below. These target congeners correspond to the six 13C-labelled PRCs and suggest the resulting estimates of Cfree may be more accurate than for target congeners without analogous 13C-PRCs. Seawater temperature ranged from approximately 17˚C to 21˚C during the deployments (https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/dsdt/cwtg/natl.html visited 1 February 2020). This variation in temperatures is not expected to affect PCB partitioning to the passive sampling polymer substantially (Ghosh et al. 2014) and was not taken into account when estimating Cfree values. Unless otherwise indicated, data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation for n = 3. For consistency, mean and standard deviations are also reported for station NBH2 days 99 and 129 although only two replicates were available (see below).
Results and Discussion
Behavior of Target and PRC PCBs
As anticipated, concentrations of target contaminants in the PE (CPEt) increased (NBH4; Figure 1a) and the PRC concentrations decreased with increasing deployment time (Figure 1b; NBH2 and NBH5 results are shown in SI Figures S2 and SI Figure S3, respectively). Remedial dredging occurred upstream from NBH 2 between the 56 and 99-day time points and resulted in the loss of one of the sampler replicates so the 99- and 129-day time points had only duplicates available for analysis. Normalizing each CPEt by the concentration in PE at 129 days (CPE129) allowed all target compound time point profiles to be compared to one another despite CPE values ranging two orders of magnitude.
Figure 1.

Relative uptake of selected target CBs into PE at all four time points (a), and the fraction of PRC retained in PE () at all four time points (b) at station NBH4. In order that all of the data can be observed, target CB data in (a) are normalized by while PRC data in (b) are normalized by . Results for stations NBH2 and NBH5 are in the SI.
Comparing CPEt/CPE129 at NBH4 at all time points revealed some expected as well as some unexpected trends (Figure 1a). As deployment time increased, concentrations of target contaminants increased with respect to CPE129. This trend is especially true for CB 101, 138, and 180. Concentration ratios for CB 8, 28, and 52 were more variable. For these congeners, the concentration ratios were similar for the 30- and 56-day time points and then nearly doubled for the 99- and 129-day time points. The comparable concentrations for the 30- and 56-day time points suggest that these compounds had reached, or were close to, equilibrium. The increase between 56 and 99 day, as well as fractions of PRCs retained, suggest that equilibrium may not have been attained, or there was a change in the Cfree during the deployment (possibly due to the dredging and resulting resuspension of contaminated sediments).
Similar behavioral trends were observed with the PRCs (13C-CB52, 13C-CB101, 13C-CB138, and 13C-CB180) (Figure 1b). Overall, the PRCs behaved as expected such that at each time point the fraction of PRC retained increased with molecular weight, and the fraction retained for each PRC decreased over time. However, contrary to mass-transport model predictions 13C-CB8 did not completely desorb by the 30-day time point. A quantifiable amount of the PRC was detected even after 129 days. The fret was greatest at 30 day and was reduced by about one half for the remaining time points (SI Table S3). 13C-CB28 also exhibited fret values that were higher than expected based on mass transport modeling and were often higher than those of 13C-CB52, although the fret did decrease as deployment time increased (SI Table S3). It is unclear why the PE retained these two PRCs at higher than expected fractions. While biofouling of the passive sampler’s surfaces was observed during some deployments, it is unlikely this explains the behavior of the 13C-CB8 and 13C-CB28 PRCs as the other larger PRCs behaved as expected. If biofouling was affecting the PRCs systematically, the larger PRCs would have also shown anomalous behavior which was not observed.
Estimation of Fractional Equilibrium
Sufficient data was collected to estimate feq using a diffusion-based mass transfer model in the water column (Thompson, Hsieh, and Luthy 2015; Tcaciuc, Apell, and Gschwend 2015; Fernandez et al. 2014). Measured fret ranged from 0 to 1 depending on the PRC and the time point (SI Tables S3). Model-estimated water boundary layers ranged from 65 to 190 μm in thickness and provided parameters for estimating feq for all target PCBs. Fractional equilibrium values from the diffusion model were then used to estimate Cfree values for all targeted PCBs at each station and time point (SI Tables S4, S5). The Cfree estimates ranged up to five orders of magnitude for a given target contaminant at the three different stations.
Sampling was fastest (i.e., most rapid approach to equilibrium values based on feq > 0.95) at NBH5 followed by NBH2 and slowest at NBH4. These rates of achieving equilibrium likely reflect the energy levels (i.e., mixing) at each station with NBH5 being the most dynamic and NBH4 the least. While the fret for the PRCs were used to calibrate the mass transfer model, feq for all PRCs were estimated along with those for target contaminants. Estimated feq values from the diffusion model ranged from 0.02 to 1. The model estimated CB8 had reached equilibrium in all deployed PE at all stations and time points and that both CB28 and CB52 had reached equilibrium at all stations by day 56. By day 129, the model predicted that PCBs with up to five chlorines had reached equilibrium, and analytical measurements of PRCs showed that all compounds except CB138 and CB180 (Cl7 and Cl8) were equilibrated.
Temporal Behavior of Cfree
Variation in Cfree estimates was investigated by estimating Cfree from deployments of varying deployment times. The ratio of (Cfreet)⁄(Cfree129) allowed an overlay of all three stations on one plot to investigate any temporal trends over the 129-day sampling period (Figure 2). Remedial dredging occurred near station NBH2 between the 56- and 99-day sampling points. This unexpected dredging event may have contributed to variation in observed Cfree concentrations in the temporal data as New Bedford Harbor is a relatively shallow estuary (Pruell et al. 1990); consequently, sediment resuspension events that can affect the water column concentrations of PCBs may occur as a result of many phenomena including storms, ship traffic and remedial and navigational dredging.
Figure 2.

Relative Cfree time series using normalization by for selected target contaminants at all three sampling stations.
The estimated Cfree remained relatively constant for all four time points at all three stations for CB28, CB52 and CB101, as measurements varied less than 20%. However, CB8 exhibited a concentration fluctuation at stations NBH2 and NBH4 between the 56- and 99-day time points. Estimated Cfree concentrations of CB8 were consistent for the 30- and 56-day time points and increased at the 99-day time point then decreased to concentrations similar to the 30- and 56-days by 129 days. CB8 is more water soluble than the other target PCBs and, of the target contaminants we investigated, this congener has a faster sampling rate in polyethylene (Schwarzenbach et al. 2003). These characteristics suggest Cfree values for CB8 will demonstrate a higher degree of sensitivity to environmental fluctuations in concentration when compared to the other target congeners.
Cfree estimates became more variable with time for target contaminants CB138 and CB180. Further, CB138 and CB180 Cfree estimates were the highest and had the largest standard deviations at the 30-day time point at all three stations. The temporal patterns were similar for both of these target contaminants with the highest Cfree estimates at day-30, followed by day-99, with days-56 and day-129 having similar concentrations of Cfree. The triplicates from the 30-day time point had the highest variability of CPEt which more than doubled when CPE∞ was estimated. Analytical bias was investigated as a possible culprit for the high concentration and high variability for the day-30 time points. Surrogate standards at 30-days showed similar recoveries (within 20%) as the later time points and sample and internal standard area counts and intensities were also similar ruling out any significant over corrections. Intermittently injected calibration standards throughout the batch sequence showed high reproducibility ruling out significant calibration error. Closer inspection of the latter three time points indicated agreement within about 30% for CB138 and 50% for CB180. Consequently, it is believed that the high estimate of Cfree and high variability in Cfree is a result of errors associated with small fractional equilibrium values causing an over-extrapolation of Cfree.
Variability in Cfree
The Cfree estimates of target PCBs were not expected to change over the course of the deployment. As discussed in the section Temporal Behavior of Cfree, several different repeatable trends were observed in the temporal plots of each of the target contaminants at the different stations (Figure 2). Relative standard deviations (RSDs) were calculated for the 27 PCBs, from Cfree values derived at each of the four time points (n = 12 for NBH4 and NBH5, and n = 10 for NBH2). These RSDs were then plotted against the compound’s log KPEW to investigate trends (Figure 3). Previous reports suggest that PRC-corrected Cfree values from passive sampling with PE have an error of about 20–25% (Apell and Gschwend 2016 and Joyce and Burgess 2018). In general, the RSD is higher than 20% for the lighter PCBs and drops down for the mid-range CBs with four chlorines, then starts to increase as log KPEW increases. This observation correlates well with what was observed in Figure 2: CB8 showed elevated Cfree values at 99 day, which may have been due to active dredging that occurred during the investigation, while CB28, CB52, and CB101 show good agreement across all four timepoints, and CB138 and CB180 show elevated Cfree estimates at the 30 day time point. Figure 3 illustrates the trends observed with all 27 PCBs showing that most of the Cfree measurements had an RSD greater than the standard of 20–25% over the 129-day time series.
Figure 3.

Relative standard deviation (%RSD) for target contaminant Cfree estimates plotted against PE partitioning coefficients (log KPEW) for all data differentiated by station with and without the 30-day deployment included.
In Figure 3, the RSD was plotted by station (various marker shapes/colors) with and without 30-day time point data (open markers). This break down illustrates two trends: the day 30 data increased the RSD for higher chlorinated CBs and that lower concentrations, like those at NBH5, also resulted in higher RSDs. For CBs with 3 chlorines, or CBs where equilibrium was estimated to have been achieved by 30 day, the RSD for Cfrees was comparable when the 30 day values were included. Results from the 30-day time point begin to diverge from the other time points for CBs with six or more chlorines. These high Cfree values relative to those determined for later timepoints often were estimated using a fractional equilibrium of about 0.1 or lower which corresponds to a correction factor of about ten or more. On average, CB180 had a fractional equilibrium of 0.02, or a correction factor of 50, at the 30-day time point. Even a small error associated with these estimates could result in large differences in estimated Cfree concentrations, which is evidenced by the larger error bars at the day 30 estimates for CB138 and CB180 in Figure 2. By 129 days, CB138 was predicted to have attained a fractional equilibrium of about 0.75 at NBH2, where there was a 10% difference between the two measured Cfree values compared to an RSD of 29% at day 30 (feq was about 0.10). A similar scenario was observed for CB180 as well as the other highly chlorinated PCBs (chlorine number > 6) measured but not reported in this work.
As discussed previously, CB138 and CB180 did not reach equilibrium over the 129 days and yielded the most variable results, and the smaller feq values associated with these congeners at the 30-day time point had relatively large RSD values amongst the replicates. The Cfree estimates at 30 day would have been equal to those of the equilibrium corrected day 129 values if CB138 had reached 17–30% equilibrium and CB180 had reached 7–11%. Table 1 summarizes the feq from the corresponding PRC measurement (feq = 1-fret), compared to the feq derived from the diffusion model, and the feq that would have generated the same Cfree as 129-day. The diffusion model used to predict feq fit the measured data well but can over-predict Cfree based on a small amount of error that may be associated with measurements of CPRC0.
Table 1.
Observed, modeled, and estimated fractional equilibriums (feq) after 30 day deployment for CB101, CB138, and CB180 at three stations.
| PCB Congener | Station | Observed feq | Equilibrium Diffusion Modeled feq | feq to = |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB101 | NBH2 | 0.41±0.04 | 0.35±0.10 | 0.65 |
| NBH4 | 0.41±0.04 | 0.31±0.03 | 0.38 | |
| NBH5 | 0.53±0.02 | 0.49±0.10 | 0.42 | |
| CB138 | NBH2 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.12±0.04 | 0.22 |
| NBH4 | 0.17±0.08 | 0.10±0.01 | 0.17 | |
| NBH5 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.16±0.05 | 0.31 | |
| CB180 | NBH2 | 0 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.07 |
| NBH4 | 0 | 0.024±0.003 | 0.06 | |
| NBH5 | 0.06±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.11 |
Passive Sampling Cfree Estimates versus Measured Water Concentrations
Cfree estimates were also compared to water concentrations (total and dissolved). In a separate investigation, discrete, one-liter grab water samples were independently taken and analyzed by Battelle (Norwell, MA, USA) in August 2015 to measure total and dissolved fractions of PCBs (personal communication). Samples were taken near NBH2 and in close proximity to the day 99 PE collection date. After filtration through a solvent-rinsed glass fiber filter (~1 μm pore size), total concentrations were determined by liquid-liquid extraction and dissolved fractions were assessed by solid phase extraction using a C-18 reverse-phase chromatography cartridge as described in Burgess et al. (2015). Detection limits for each congener were around 1 ng/L for both total and dissolved fractions.
Due to the relatively high detection limits associated with discrete grab sampling, a small number of congeners were detected in both studies. Twenty congeners were measured in the total concentration that were also measured in this study and eight congeners detected in the dissolved fraction were measured in this study. It is worth noting that the total and C-18 based measurements can suffer from many sampling artifacts not affecting passive sampling. These include losses of target contaminants to sampling container surfaces and over-estimations of target contaminant concentrations resulting from accidentally extracting colloids and very small sediment particles (Adams et al. 2003). Together, these artifacts cause uncertainty in these measurements that do not occur with passive sampling. Comparisons of the two measurements with the Cfree estimates from the day-99 deployment are illustrated in Figure 4. As expected, the total concentrations were larger than the corresponding Cfrees calculated herein. On average, the total concentrations were about forty times higher than the Cfree estimates, where the ratio ranged from two to about 75 and increased with hydrophobicity (Figure 4). The measured dissolved concentrations based on C-18 isolation were, on average, within a factor of 2.5 of the estimated Cfree concentrations measured in this study. More specifically, five of the eight mutually measured compounds agreed within a factor of two. The estimated Cfrees from this study were larger by a factor of 18, 2.5, and 3.7 for congeners CB28, CB52, and CB110, respectively. According to our calculated Cfree values, CB70, CB99 and CB118 should have also been detected in the dissolved measurements but were reported below detection limits. The larger differences in concentration for CB 28, CB52, and CB110 may be a result of errors in the partitioning coefficients or the analytical chemical measurements. However, this error likely will not completely explain the large difference in CB28 concentrations. The estimated Cfree values were not increased due to PRC-correction, so over-correction did not contribute to this difference.
Figure 4.

Discrete water concentration measurements versus Cfree measured over 99 days by passive sampler at or near NBH2.
It is also important to recognize that these discrete samples are representative of the moment that they were taken. The passive sampling derived Cfree is a time integrated measurement dependent upon how rapidly a given target contaminant achieves equilibrium with the passive sampler. Lower molecular weight target PCBs, in this study, may reflect Cfree at the end of the deployment while higher molecular weight target PCBs will reflect more of the entire deployment period, which in this specific comparison was 99 days. Many of the lighter more mobile congeners (e.g. CB8, CB18, and CB28) showed a large Cfree over 99 days which decreased downward to concentrations comparable to the 30- and 56-day deployments by the day 129 sampling period. If concentrations had increased temporarily due to dredging or a weather event and then decreased by the time discrete sampling occurred, it would not be reflected in the discrete sample but would be incorporated into the passive sampling derived Cfree.
Implications
Overall, this unique temporal study has shown that using PRCs yields reproducible Cfree values that are within a factor of three for all estimated fractional equilibrium values generated using a diffusion-based mass transfer model. Cfree values that were estimated using a fractional equilibrium less than 0.10, often resulted in Cfree values that were three times larger than estimates that had been allowed longer deployment times and required smaller corrections (i.e., closer to equilibrium). This variability suggests that large corrections (i.e., low fractional equilibrium values) may yield less accurate CPE∞ and Cfree estimates. Contaminants that had fractional equilibrium values around 0.05 (PCBs with five or more chlorines) after a 30-day deployment occasionally resulted in Cfree values that were almost twice as high as estimates that required smaller corrections. Contaminants that had achieved equilibrium by 30 days or by 56 days showed good agreement over all four sampling points. Therefore, to reduce variability and generate more reliable Cfree values it is recommended that when targeting very hydrophobic, slow-equilibrating contaminants, like PCBs with more than six chlorines or contaminants with a log KOW ≥ 6.5, a deployment time of longer than 30 days may be beneficial and prudent. The consistency of estimated Cfree for contaminants at equilibrium suggests that the sampler integrity will be intact over a longer sampling period.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the insightful comments on the draft manuscript by the internal reviewers Richard McKinney, Kenneth Rocha and Jonathan Serbst. We also thank Lisa Lefkovitz and Deidre Dahlen (Battelle, Norwell, MA, USA) for providing their water column discreet grab concentrations data. We would also like to acknowledge Donald Cobb, Barbara Bergen, and Michaela Cashman for their assistance in deploying and retrieving the passive samplers. This work was performed while ASJ was a National Research Council post-doctoral research associate at the U.S. EPA’s ORD/NHEERL Atlantic Ecology Division (Narragansett, RI, USA).
References
- Adams WJ, Burgess RM, Gold-Bouchot G, LeBlanc L, Liber K, Williamson B. 2003. Porewater chemistry: effects of sampling, storage, handling and toxicity testing In Porewater Toxicity Testing: Biological, Chemical and Ecological Considerations, Carr RSand Nipper M(Eds.), SETAC Technical Publication. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, USA: pp. 95–124. [Google Scholar]
- Adams RG, Lohmann R, Fernandez LA, MacFarlane JK. 2007. Polyethylene devices: passive samplers for measuring dissolved hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic environments. Environ Sci Technol 41: 1317–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Apell N, Gschwend PM. 2016. In situ passive sampling of sediments in the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund site: Replicability, comparison with ex situ measurements, and use of data. Environ Poll 218: 95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Apell JN, Shull DH, Hoyt AM, Gschwend PM. 2018. Investigating the effect of bio-irrigation on in situ porewater concentrations and fluxes of polychlorinated biphenyls using passive samplers. Environ Sci Technol 52:4565–4573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao J, Wu X, Jia F, Zeng EY, Gan J. 2016. Isotopic exchange on solid-phase micro extraction fiber in sediment under stagnant conditions: Implications for field application of performance reference compound calibration. Environ Toxicol Chem 35: 1978–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booij K, Robinson CD, Burgess RM, Mayer P, Roberts CA, Ahrens L, Allan IJ, Brant J, Jones L, Kraus UR, Larsen MM, Lepom P, Petersen J, Pröfrock D, Roose P, Schäfer S, Smedes F, Tixier C, Vorkamp K, Whitehouse P. 2016. Passive sampling in regulatory chemical monitoring of nonpolar organic compounds in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 50: 3–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booij K, Sleiderink HM, Smedes F. 1998. Calibrating the uptake kinetics of semipermeable membrane devices using exposure standards. Environ Toxicol Chem. 17: 1236–45. [Google Scholar]
- Booij K, Smedes F. 2010. An improved method for estimating in situ sampling rates of nonpolar passive samplers. Environ Sci Technol 44: 6789–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booij K, Smedes F, van Weerlee E. 2002. Spiking of performance reference compounds in low density polyethylene and silicone passive water samplers. Chemosphere 46: 1157–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgess RM, Lohmann R, Schubauer-Berigan JP, Reitsma P, Perron MM, Lefkovitz L, Cantwell MG. 2015. Application of passive sampling for measuring dissolved concentrations of organic contaminants in the water column at three marine superfund sites. Environ Toxicol Chem 34: 1720–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi Y, Wu Y, Luthy RG, Kang S. 2016. Non-equilibrium passive sampling of hydrophobic organic contaminants in sediment pore-water: PCB exchange kinetics. J Hazard Mater 318: 579–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Estoppey N, Schopfer A, Omlin J, Esseiva P, Vermeirssen ELM, Delémont O, De Alencastro LF. 2014. Effect of water velocity on the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers: An assessment of the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) in river-like flow conditions. Sci Tot Environ 499: 319–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez LA, Harvey CF, Gschwend PM. 2009. Using performance reference compounds in polyethylene passive samplers to deduce sediment porewater concentrations for numerous target chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 43: 8888–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez LA, Lao W, Maruya KA, White C, Burgess RM. 2012. Passive sampling to measure baseline dissolved persistent organic pollutant concentrations in the water column of the Palos Verdes Shelf Superfund site. Environ Sci Technol 46: 11937–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez LA, Lao W, Maruya KA, Burgess RM. 2014. calculating the diffusive flux of persistent organic pollutants between sediments and the water column on the Palos Verdes Shelf Superfund site using polymeric passive samplers. Environ Sci Technol 48: 3925–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh U, Driscoll SK, Burgess RM, Jonker MTO, Reible D, Gobas F, Choi Y, Apitz SE, Maruya KA, Gala WR, Mortimer M, Beegan C. 2014. Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Practical guidance for selection, calibration, and implementation. Integr Environ Assess Manage 10: 210–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gschwend PM, MacFarlane JK, Reible DD, Lu X, Hawthorne SB, Nakles DV, Thompson T. 2011. Comparison of polymeric samplers for accurately assessing PCBs in pore waters. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 1288–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawker DW, Connell DW. 1988. Octanol-water partition coefficients of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners. Environ Sci Technol 22: 382–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacquet R, Miège C, Smedes F, Tixier C, Tronczynski J, Togola A, Berho C, Valor I, Llorca J, Barillon B, Marchand P, Coquery M. 2014. Comparison of five integrative samplers in laboratory for the monitoring of indicator and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in water. Chemosphere 98: 18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce AS, Burgess RM. 2018. Using performance reference compounds to compare mass transfer calibration methodologies in passive samplers deployed in the water column. Environ Toxicol Chem 37: 2089–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce AS, Pirogovsky MS, Adams RG, Lao W, Tsukada D, Cash CL, Haw JF, Maruya KA. 2015. Using performance reference compound-corrected polyethylene passive samplers and caged bivalves to measure hydrophobic contaminants of concern in urban coastal seawaters. Chemosphere 127: 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce AS, Portis LM, Parks AN, Burgess RM. 2016. Evaluating the relationship between equilibrium passive sampler uptake and aquatic organism bioaccumulation. Environ Sci Technol 50: 11437–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khairy M, Muir D, Teixeira C, Lohmann R. 2015Spatial distribution, air–water fugacity ratios and source apportionment of polychlorinated biphenyls in the Lower Great Lakes Basin. Environ Sci Technol 49: 13787–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, Wang S, McDonough CA, Khairy M, Muir DCG, Helm PA, Lohmann R. 2016. Gaseous and freely-dissolved pcbs in the lower great lakes based on passive sampling: spatial trends and air–water exchange. Environ Sci Technol 50: 4932–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohmann R, Booij K, Smedes F Vrana B. 2012. Use of passive sampling devices for monitoring and compliance checking of POP concentrations in water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19: 1885–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lydy MJ, Landrum PF, Oen AMP, Allinson M, Smedes F, Harwood AD, Li H, Maruya KA, Liu J. 2014. Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: State of the science for organic contaminants. Integr Environ Assess Manage 10: 167–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer P, Parkerton TF, Adams RG, Cargill JG, Gan J, Gouin T, Gschwend PM, Hawthorne SB, Helm P, Witt G, You J, Escher BI. 2014. Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: Scientific rationale supporting use of freely dissolved concentrations. Integr Environ Assess Manage 10: 197–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonough CA, Puggioni G, Helm PA, Muir D, Lohmann R. 2016. Spatial distribution and air–water exchange of organic flame retardants in the Lower Great Lakes. Environ Sci Technol 50: 9133–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perron MM, Burgess RM, Suuberg EM, Cantwell MG, Pennell KG. 2013a. Performance of passive samplers for monitoring estuarine water column concentrations: 1. Contaminants of concern. Environ Toxicol Chem 32: 2182–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perron MM, Burgess RM, Suuberg EM, Cantwell MG, Pennell KG. 2013b. Performance of passive samplers for monitoring estuarine water column concentrations: 2. Emerging contaminants Environ Toxicol Chem 32: 2190–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pruell RJ, Norwood CB, Bowen RD, Boothman WS, Rogerson PF, Hackett M, Butterworth BC. 1990. Geochemical study of sediment contamination in New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts. Mar Environ Res 29: 77–101. [Google Scholar]
- Sanders JP, Andrade NA, Ghosh U. 2018. Evaluation of passive sampling polymers and nonequilibrium adjustment methods in a multiyear surveillance of sediment [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- porewater PCBs. Environ Toxicol Chem 37: 2487–2495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt SN, Wang AP, Gidley PT, Wooley AH, Lotufo GR, Burgess RM, Ghosh U, Fernandez LA, Mayer P. 2017. Cross Validation of two partitioning-based sampling approaches in mesocosms containing pcb contaminated field sediment, biota, and activated carbon amendment. Environ Sci Technol 51: 9996–10004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM. 2003. Environmental Organic Chemistry. Wiley-InterScience, Hoboken, NJ, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Shen X, Reible D. 2019. An analytical model for the fate and transport of performance reference compounds and target compounds around cylindrical passive samplers. Chemosphere 232:489–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smedes F 2007. Monitoring of chlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by passive sampling in concert with deployed mussels in Greenwood R, Graham A. Mills and Branislav Vrana (eds.), Passive Sampling Techniques in Environmental Monitoring (Elsevier: Amsterdan; ). [Google Scholar]
- Tcaciuc PA, Apell JN, Gschwend PM. 2015. Modeling the transport of organic chemicals between polyethylene passive samplers and water in finite and infinite bath conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 34: 2739–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson JM, Hsieh C-H, Luthy RG. 2015. Modeling uptake of hydrophobic organic contaminants into polyethylene passive samplers. Environ Sci Technol 49: 2270–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomaszewski JE, Luthy RG. 2008. Field deployment of polyethylene devices to measure PCB concentrations in pore water of contaminated sediment. Environ Sci Technol 42: 6086–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vrana B, Schüürmann G. 2002. Calibrating the uptake kinetics of semipermeable membrane devices in water: impact of hydrodynamics. Environ Sci Technol 36: 290–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
