Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0234870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234870

Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high-value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi

Simona Dzurendova 1,*, Boris Zimmermann 1, Achim Kohler 1, Valeria Tafintseva 1, Ondrej Slany 2, Milan Certik 2, Volha Shapaval 1
Editor: Marie-Joelle Virolle3
PMCID: PMC7307774  PMID: 32569317

Abstract

Mucoromycota fungi possess a versatile metabolism and can utilize various substrates for production of industrially important products, such as lipids, chitin/chitosan, polyphosphates, pigments, alcohols and organic acids. However, as far as commercialisation is concerned, establishing industrial biotechnological processes based on Mucoromycota fungi is still challenging due to the high production costs compared to the final product value. Therefore, the development of co-production concept is highly desired since more than one valuable product could be produced at the time and the process has a potentially higher viability. To develop such biotechnological strategy, we applied a high throughput approach consisting of micro-titre cultivation and FTIR spectroscopy. This approach allows single-step biochemical fingerprinting of either fungal biomass or growth media without tedious extraction of metabolites. The influence of two types of nitrogen sources and different levels of inorganic phosphorus on the co-production of lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates for nine different oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi was evaluated. FTIR analysis of biochemical composition of Mucoromycota fungi and biomass yield showed that variation in inorganic phosphorus had higher effect when inorganic nitrogen source–ammonium sulphate–was used. It was observed that: (1) Umbelopsis vinacea reached almost double biomass yield compared to other strains when yeast extract was used as nitrogen source while phosphorus limitation had little effect on the biomass yield; (2) Mucor circinelloides, Rhizopus stolonifer, Amylomyces rouxii, Absidia glauca and Lichtheimia corymbifera overproduced chitin/chitosan under the low pH caused by the limitation of inorganic phosphorus; (3) Mucor circinelloides, Amylomyces rouxii, Rhizopus stolonifer and Absidia glauca were able to store polyphosphates in addition to lipids when high concentration of inorganic phosphorus was used; (4) the biomass and lipid yield of high-value lipid producers Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina were significantly increased when high concentrations of inorganic phosphorus were combined with ammonium sulphate, while the same amount of inorganic phosphorus combined with yeast extract showed negative impact on the growth and lipid accumulation. FTIR spectroscopy revealed the co-production potential of several oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi forming lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates in a single cultivation process.

Introduction

Biorefinery is the sustainable processing of biomass into a spectrum of marketable products, such as biofuels and biochemicals, through the application of green conversion technologies [1]. Mucoromycota filamentous fungi play an important role in developing sustainable biorefinery processes due to their versatile metabolism and ability to utilize a broad range of renewable feedstock, rest and waste materials [24]. Mucoromycota fungi are able to produce a number of industrially important products, such as alcohols, organic acids and enzymes [5]. Moreover, the biomass of Mucoromycota fungi is rich in various high-value metabolites such as lipids, proteins, pigments, polyphosphates and chitosan [6], making it well suited for nutrition purposes as a whole.

It is well known that some filamentous fungi, so-called oleaginous fungi, are able to produce high amounts of lipids. Oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi are able to accumulate lipids (Single Cell Oils–SCOs) with up to 80% w/w yield [7]. SCOs are stored in globular intracellular organelles (i.e. lipid bodies) predominantly in the form of triacylglycerides (TAGs) [8, 9]. Depending on a fungal strain, fungal lipids can be very similar to vegetable oils and thus suitable for biodiesel production, or similar to highly nutritious and valuable fish oils with high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) [1013]. Although SCOs production by oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi has been suggested and up-scaled a century ago [14], industrial process based on Mucoromycota fungi are still limited only to production of high-value PUFA-rich oils. For example gamma-linoleic and arachidonic acids rich oils are produced industrially by Mucor circinelloides and Mortierella alpina [15].

Despite all the developments in the field of fungal SCOs, a commercially sustainable Mucoromycota-based biodiesel production has not yet been established. The production of relatively low-valued fungal lipids, such as biodiesels, could become economically feasible if a concept of co-production of lipids and other value-added chemicals is applied [16]. Such co-production concept for oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi has been first suggested for production of chitosan and biodiesel lipids by Mucor circinelloides [17]. Other co-production strategies using Mucoromycota include concomitant production of fumaric acid and chitin by Rhizopus oryzae [18], lactic acid and chitin by Rhizopus oryzae [19], lipids, proteins, ethanol and chitosan by Rhizopus oryzae and Mucor indicus [20].

When developing a sustainable co-production strategy for oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi, the aim is to co-produce high-value metabolites which are generated in metabolic pathways that are not competing for carbon sources. Thus, co-production of extracellular acids and intracellular lipids is expected to have low sustainability since these metabolic pathways are competing for the carbon source. Notwithstanding, strategies based on the co-production of metabolites of lipid bodies and cell wall are advantageous since metabolic pathways for the production of chemical components of these two organelles are not competing. The major components of the cell wall in Mucoromycota fungi are commercially lucrative biopolymers chitin, chitosan and polyphosphates [21].

Chitin (ß-1,4-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) and its deacetylated form, chitosan (ß-1,4-D-glucosamine), are natural biodegradable polymers with a broad range of applications in food, pharmaceutical and agricultural industries [22]. Chitosan belongs to the most versatile and promising functional biopolymers, with superior material properties and interesting biological activities. An increasing market demand for high-quality chitosan exceeds the current global production, which is based primarily on deacetylation of chitin from shells of crustaceans. Therefore, production based on Mucoromycota fungi could be lucrative, in particular since Mucoromycota are among the rather rare natural producers of chitosan. In some cases, the total chitin and chitosan yield in Mucoromycota fungi can reach up to 40% w/w [23].

Another important biopolymer of the Mucoromycota cell wall is polyphosphate [24], a chain of phosphate units connected by high-energy phospho-anhydride bonds. Polyphosphates have several key functions in fungal cells, such as energy and phosphate storage, controlling of fungal homeostasis via trapping cations and amino acids, and regulation of the hyphal phosphate amount [25]. Phosphorus accumulation takes place in the exponential growth phase, when the source of phosphorus is in high access [26]. Phosphorus accumulating Mucoromycota fungi are able to store more polyphosphates than needed for their survival, which is very attractive for the phosphorus recovery. Currently, the global phosphorus market is getting into a critical situation due to the limited availability of rock phosphate, which is a non-renewable phosphorus source. Various waste substrates contain significant amounts of phosphorus that could be recovered if appropriate processes for phosphorus recovery were available. Waste sources of phosphorus are municipal waste or waste-water streams [27]. The traditional phosphorus recovery approach is based on wet-chemistry and thermo-chemical treatment. It requires the use of chemicals and high energy [28]. An alternative and more sustainable way of phosphorus recovery is based on utilizing filamentous fungi that are able to accumulate phosphorus during their growth [26]. Therefore, production of fungal polyphosphate in a biorefinery concept can have a significant contribution to phosphorus recycling. However, not all fungal strains possess the ability to accumulate phosphorus and therefore biotechnologically valuable phosphorus-accumulating strains need to be identified.

The development of sustainable fungal biorefinery for co-production of lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates depends sensitively on the chemical composition of the substrates since different sources are required for the different metabolic processes needed to reach the target products. When processes are built on the utilization of different rest materials and waste streams as low-cost substrates, theses substrates need to be modified and optimized such that they contain all needed sources in the best possible concentrations. Rest materials and waste streams have a highly diverse chemical composition and there is a need to enrich them with essential macro- and micro-nutrients. Therefore, the optimization of cultivation media or substrates based on rest materials and waste streams is crucial in the fungal biorefinery process development. In order to perform adequate optimizing of rest materials-based substrates, there is a need for deeper understanding the effect of single media components on the synthesis of different intra- and extracellular metabolites in fungal cells. Extensive research has been done on studying the role of different carbon and to some extend nitrogen sources [2933] for the fungal fermentation in general and for the production of one main metabolite. However, there is a very little known about the role of phosphorus on the production of different metabolites, as this element is mostly examined in the context of polyphosphates accumulation [34]. In addition, to our knowledge no study has been performed so far that investigates the effect of single media nutrients either in excess or in limited amounts on the co-production of several metabolites by fungi.

The traditional approach for monitoring and developing the production of different metabolites in fungal cells is based on the extraction or separation of the produced metabolites followed by further qualitative and quantitative analysis using different analytical procedures. Such approach requires significant amount of biomass for the analysis, since different metabolites need to be extracted and analyzed in different and often expensive and time-consuming ways. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a rapid non-invasive technology allowing biochemical fingerprinting of all cell chemical components [35]. While FTIR spectroscopy has been used for many decades for structural chemical analysis, FTIR spectroscopy became a popular tool for identification and characterization of biological materials in the 90ies. FTIR spectroscopy has been extensively used in applied microbiology and biotechnology of various types of microorganisms, including fungi [3641], bacteria [4244], yeasts [4550] or algae [5153]. Moreover, FTIR spectroscopy was applied as a tool for measurement of growth media and extracellular metabolites [54, 55]. FTIR spectroscopy has been shown to be precise and reliable method for the identification and analysis of microbial lipids [10, 5661], chitin/chitosan [6265] and polyphosphates [66, 67]. Further, this method has been utilized for monitoring lipid extraction in oleaginous filamentous fungi [68, 69]. Thus, FTIR showed the potential to serve as the sole method for the bioprocess monitoring. Combined with the Duetz microtiter plate system (Duetz-MTPS), FTIR can serve as a rapid tool for monitoring of high throughput studies, such as screening of fungal strains for high and low value lipid production [10, 70]. Moreover, high throughput screening was strengthen by a fully automated set-up of the biomass samples preparation for the FTIR-HTS analysis [7173].

The aim of this study was to assess the biotechnological potential of oleaginous Mucoromycota grown on two different nitrogen sources, namely yeast extract and ammonium sulphate, in combination with six different inorganic phosphorus (Pi) concentrations in a high throughput screening using FTIR spectroscopy combined with Duetz-MTPS. The primary goal of presented high throughput screening is the identification of co-producing strains and understanding the role of phosphorus and nitrogen alone and in the interaction in the co-production. Thus, the study provides relative estimation of the high-value metabolites co-produced by Mucoromycota fungi and, therefore, can be considered as a basis for further research in developing of co-production concepts.

1. Materials and methods

1.1. Oleaginous filamentous fungi

Nine oleaginous filamentous fungi from the genera Absidia, Amylomyces, Cunninghamella, Lichthemia, Mortierella, Mucor, Rhizopus and Umbelopsis were used in the study (Table 1). The selection of fungal strains was based on the results of our recent study, where 100 oleaginous filamentous fungi were screened for the ability to accumulate high amount of lipids [10]. While some Mucoromycota species have been previously identified as medically important [74], in general they have been utilised at industrial scale as cell factories for example for chitosan, lipids or lactic acid production.

Table 1. List of oleaginous filamentous fungi used in the study.

Fungal strain name Collection № Short name
Absidia glauca CCM1 451 AGL
Amylomyces rouxii CCM F220 ARO
Cunninghamella blakesleeana CCM F705 CBL
Lichtheimia corymbifera CCM 8077 LCO
Mortierella alpina ATCC2 32222 MAL
Mortierella hyalina VKM3 F1629 MHY
Mucor circinelloides VI4 04473 MCI
Rhizopus stolonifer VKM F-400 RST
Umbelopsis vinacea CCM F539 UVI

1Czech collection of Microorganisms (Brno, Czech Republic)

2American Type Culture Collection (Virginia, USA)

3All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms (Moscow, Russia), and

4Norwegian school of Veterinary Science (Oslo, Norway).

1.2. Design of the experiment

Six different concentrations of phosphate salts–KH2PO4 and Na2HPO4, and two different nitrogen sources–yeast extract (YE) and ammonium sulphate (AS)–were used for the cultivation of fungi in a full factorial design. The cultivation was performed in Duetz-MTPS [54] in three independent biological replicates for each fungus, phosphorus concentration and nitrogen source, resulting in 324 samples. Biological replicates were prepared on separate microtiter plates and cultivated at different time points for each fungal strain. For every biological replicate, fresh spore suspension was prepared.

1.3. Growth media and cultivation conditions

Growth of the selected fungi was done in two steps: 1) growth on standard agar medium for preparing spore inoculum and 2) growth in nitrogen-limited broth media with different inorganic phosphorus (Pi) concentrations and nitrogen sources in the Duetz-MTPS.

For the preparation of spore inoculum, Mortierella and Umbelopsis were cultivated on potato dextrose agar, while all other strains were cultivated on malt extract agar. Malt extract agar was prepared by dissolving 30 g of malt extract (Merck, Germany), 5 g of peptone (Amresco, USA) and 15 g of agar powder (Alfa Aesar, ThermoFischer, Germany) in 1L of distilled water and autoclaved at 115°C for 15 min. Potato dextrose agar was prepared by dissolving 39 g of potato dextrose agar (VWR, Belgium) in 1L of distilled water and autoclaved at 115°C for 15 min. Agar cultivation was performed for 7 days at 25°C for all strains except for Mortierella (14 days) due to the slower growth of Mortierella. Fungal spores were harvested from agar plates with a bacteriological loop after the addition of 10 mL of sterile 0.9% NaCl solution.

The main components of the nitrogen-limited broth media [75] with modifications [76] (g· L-1) were: glucose 80, yeast extract 3, MgSO4·7H2O 1.5, CaCl2·2H2O 0.1, FeCl3·6H2O 0.008, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.001, CoSO4·7H2O 0.0001, CuSO4·5H2O 0.0001, MnSO4·5H2O 0.0001. For broth media with ammonium sulphate as a nitrogen source, yeast extract was replaced with 1.5 g/L of (NH4)2SO4 in order to keep the same C/N ratio as with yeast extract medium. Broth media with ammonium sulphate contained 0.05g/L thiamin hydrochloride and 0.02 mg/L biotin [77]. Different concentrations of phosphate salts, namely KH2PO4 and Na2HPO4, were added to the main components of nitrogen-limited broth medium, as described in Table 2. The concentrations of phosphate salts, 7 g·L-1 KH2PO4 and 2 g·L-1 Na2HPO4, were selected as a reference value (Pi1) since they have frequently been used in cultivation of oleaginous Mucoromycota [75, 76]. The broth media contained higher (up to 8 × Pi1) and lower (up to ¼ × Pi1) amount of phosphate salts compared to the reference value (Table 2). Broth media with the decreased amount of inorganic phosphorus contained KCl and NaCl in a corresponding concentration in order to have equal K+ and Na+ ions as in the reference condition (Pi1). Broth media were autoclaved for 15 min at 121°C. The starting pH of media was 6 ± 0.3 and pH of growth media was measured as well after the cultivation.

Table 2. The concentration of phosphate salts in the nitrogen-limited broth media.

Sample name KH2PO4 (g· L-1) Na2HPO4 (g· L-1)
Pi8 56 16
Pi4 28 8
Pi2 14 4
Pi1 7 2
Pi0.5 3.5 1
Pi0.25 1.75 0.5

Cultivation in broth media was performed in the Duetz-MTPS (Enzyscreen, Netherlands) which consists of 24-square polypropylene deep well microtiter plates, low evaporation sandwich covers and extra high cover clamps, which were placed into the MAXQ 4000 shaker (Thermo Scientific). The autoclaved microtiter plates were filled with 7 ml of sterile broth media per well, and each well was inoculated with 50 μl of spore inoculum. Cultivation was performed for 7 days at 25°C and 400 rpm agitation (1.9 cm circular orbit). Fungi Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina were cultivated for 14 days due to their slow growth.

1.4. Analysis

1.4.1. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of fungal biomass

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis of fungal biomass was performed according to [76] with some modifications. The biomass was separated from the growth media by centrifugation and washed with distilled water. Approximately 5 mg of fresh washed biomass was transferred into 2 ml polypropylene tube containing 250±30 mg of acid washed glass beads and 0.5 ml of distilled water for further homogenization. The remaining washed biomass was freeze-dried for 24 hours for determining biomass yield. In total, 312 biomass samples were analysed in three technical replicates by FTIR spectroscopy. Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina in Pi8 conditions were not measured since no growth was observed.

The homogenization of fungal biomass was performed by using Percellys Evolution tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, France) with the following set-up: 5500 rpm, 6 × 20 s cycle. 10 μl of homogenized fungal biomass was pipetted onto an IR transparent 384-well silica microplate. Samples were dried at room temperature for two hours. For every sample, three technical replicates were prepared. The FTIR spectra were recorded in the region between 4000 cm-1 and 500 cm-1 with a spectral resolution of 6 cm-1, a digital spacing of 1.928 cm−1, and an aperture of 5 mm. Spectra were recorded in a transmission mode using the High Throughput Screening eXTension (HTS-XT) unit coupled to the Vertex 70 FTIR spectrometer (both Bruker Optik, Germany). For each spectrum, 64 scans were averaged. Spectra were recorded as the ratio of the sample spectrum to the spectrum of the empty IR transparent microplate. In total, 936 biomass spectra were obtained. The OPUS software (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany) was used for data acquisition and instrument control.

1.4.2. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-infrared spectra of growth media after cultivation, were recorded using a Vertex 70 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany) with a single reflectance-attenuated total-reflectance accessory. For identification of basic biochemicals in the growth media and the biomass a set of model compounds was measured. Spectra of glyceryl trioleate ((9Z)9-Octadecenoic acid 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester), chitin, and sodium polyphosphate were measured. Moreover, spectra of pure water, and water solutions of pure glucose, ammonium sulphate, yeast extract, phosphates, as well as media before cultivation were recorded. All chemicals were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and used without further purification. In addition to growth media, spectra of pure water, and water solutions of pure glucose, ammonium sulphate, yeast extract, phosphates, as well as media before cultivation were recorded. The ATR IR spectra were recorded with a total of 32 scans and spectral resolution of 4 cm-1 over the range of 4000–600 cm-1, using the horizontal ATR diamond prism with 45° angle of incidence on a High Temperature Golden gate ATR Mk II (Specac, United Kingdom). For each measurement a 10 μl droplet of sample was placed on the surface of the ATR diamond crystal. 972 samples were measured in total. The OPUS software (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany) was used for data acquisition and instrument control. Growth media after cultivation were measured with the HTS-XT system as well, in the configuration mentioned above.

1.4.3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Mucor circinelloides hyphae sections

Fresh washed fungal biomass was fixated by applying the fixating solution consisting of 2% paraformaldehyde, 1.25% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 1 hour at 4°C. Subsequently, the fixating solution was removed by centrifugation at 11000 rpm for 15 min and the fixated biomass was washed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (for 10 min at 4°C for each washing step). Buffer was removed and the fixated biomass was postfixated in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 1h. After the postfixation, the fungal biomass was dehydrated with ethanol employing each of the following ethanol concentrations for 15 minutes: 70%, 90%, 96% and 100% ethanol. The last concentration was repeated four times for 15 minutes. Thereafter, the LR White resin (LRW) medium grade was infiltrated into the biomass in the mixture with ethanol in following LRW/ethanol ratios: 1:3, over night; 1:1 overnight; 3:1 overnight; 100% LRW overnight. Finally, the fixated biomass was embedded in 100% LRW overnight at 60°C in the oven. The embedded biomass was sectioned using Leica EM UC6 into 60 nm thin slices and sections were monitored using FEI Morgagni 268 Transmission electron microscope equipped with Olympus Veleta CCD camera.

1.5. Data analysis

The Following software packages were used for the data analysis: Unscrambler X version 10.5.1 (CAMO Analytics, Norway), Orange data mining toolbox version 3.15 (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia) [78, 79], and Matlab R2018a (The Mathworks Inc., Natick, USA).

1.5.1. Pre-processing of FTIR spectra

The pre-processing of FTIR-HTS spectra was performed in two ways:

(1) FTIR-HTS spectra of the biomass were first transformed to second-derivative spectra by the Savitzky−Golay algorithm using a polynomial of degree 2 and a window size of either 11 or 61 points in total. Different window sizes were used in order to emphasize either narrow peaks associated with lipids and chitin/chitosan (window size 11), or broad peaks associated with polyphosphates (window size 61). The second-derivative spectra were pre-processed by extended multiplicative scatter correction (EMSC), an MSC model extended by a linear and quadratic components [8082]. Technical replicates (936 spectra in total) were averaged in order to remove technical variability of the measurements, resulting into 312 spectra. These spectra were cut and used for the PCA analysis of specific lipid- (3020–2819 cm-1, 1760–1726 cm-1, 1475–1375 cm-1, 1160–1149 cm-1, 730–715 cm-1), polyphosphates- (1301–1203 cm-1, 925–842 cm-1) and chitin/chitosan (3457–3417 cm-1, 3293–3251 cm-1, 3133–3081 cm-1, 1639–1623 cm-1, 1392–1346 cm-1, 962–941 cm-1) spectral regions (Figs 7, 9 and 11) in order to show the reproducibility of the growth experiment (i.e. biological replicates).

Fig 7. PCA results (first principal component) for the lipid region 3020–2819 cm-1, 1760–1726 cm-1, 1475–1375 cm-1, 1160–1149 cm-1, 730–715 cm-1) of FTIR-HTS spectra (pre-processed by 2nd derivative and EMSC).

Fig 7

The scores for the first principal component are plotted for all strains in A and B. In A and C, the score plot and the corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on YE-Pi using different Pi levels. In B and D, the score plot and corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on AS-Pi media using different Pi levels. The color coding is according to the Pi levels. The loading plots show that the total lipid content is increasing from the right to the left in both score plots. The explained variance for the first principal component is 66% and 76% for YE and AS, respectively.

Fig 9.

Fig 9

PCA results (first principal component) for the polyphosphate region (1301–1203 cm-1, 925–842 cm-1) of FTIR-HTS (pre-processed by 2nd derivative and EMSC) spectra of fungi grown on (A) YE-Pi and (B) AS-Pi. The scores for the first component is plotted for all strains in A and B. In A and C, the score plot and the corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on YE-Pi using different Pi levels. In B and D, the score plot and corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on AS-Pi media using different Pi levels. The color coding is according to the Pi levels. The loading plots show that the total polyphosphates content is increasing from the left to the right in both score plots. The explained variance for the first principal component is 95% and 93% for YE and AS, respectively.

Fig 11.

Fig 11

PCA results (first principal component) for the chitin/chitosan region (3457–3417 cm-1, 3293–3251 cm-1, 3133–3081 cm-1, 1639–1623 cm-1, 1392–1346 cm-1, 962–941 cm-1) of FTIR-HTS spectra of fungi (pre-processed by 2nd derivative and EMSC) grown on (A) YE-Pi and (B) AS-Pi. In A and C, the score plot and the corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on YE-Pi using different Pi levels. In B and D, the score plot and the corresponding loading plot are shown for fungi grown on AS-Pi media using different Pi levels. The color coding is according to the Pi levels. The loading plots show that the total chitin/chitosan content is increasing from the left to the right in both score plots. The explained variance for the first principal component is 79% and 80% for YE and AS, respectively.

(2) In order to get overview of all samples in whole measured spectral region, technical replicates (936 spectra in total) were averaged in order to remove technical variability of the measurements, resulting into 312 spectra (biological replicates). Further, biological replicates were averaged, resulting in 104 FTIR spectra, and pre-processed by EMSC. After pre-processing, spectra were used for PCA analysis (Fig 6) and to plot each fungal strain separately for the observation of the effect of different amounts of phosphate salts on the biochemical composition of biomass (S1S18 Figs).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

PCA score plots of FTIR-HTS spectra of fungi grown at different phosphorus concentrations on yeast extract (A) and ammonium sulphate (B). Numbers in PCA score plots indicate the Pi amounts. Vectors on axis describe an observed increase of the metabolites chitin/chitosan, polyphosphates and lipids. Below the scatter plots, loading vectors for PC1 (full line) and PC2 (dashed line) are plotted in C and D, respectively. The explained variance for the first and second principal components are 87% and 7%, respectively, for YE and 69% and 20% for AS.

1.5.2. Principle component analysis (PCA) and variation contribution analysis

Principle component analysis (PCA) was conducted on the pre-processed FTIR data. To evaluate influence of different nitrogen sources, PCA analysis was done on the data set split into two parts: 1) samples grown on yeast extract (YE), 2) samples grown on ammonium sulphate (AS). Variation in the data introduced by the different design parameters, specifically N-source, Pi concentration and N-Pi interaction, was calculated for each strain independently in each data set. In ANOVA model a data matrix is represented as a sum of matrices that describe experimental design factors and the residual error. Each of these matrices consists of the means of the spectra that correspond to different levels of the design factor. The variation due to each factor can then be calculated. The ANOVA model for this study contained three design factors: N-source, Pi concentration and N-Pi interaction. The factor “N-source” had two levels (YE, AS), the factor “Pi concentration” consisted of six levels (six different Pi concentrations), the design factor “N-Pi interaction” had 12 levels. Biological and other variations not of interest for this study were kept as a part of residuals. The variation of each factor was normalized by the sum of the variations for the three factors of interest, so they summed up to 100%. Such ANOVA model underlies commonly used ANOVA-PCA and ASCA analysis [83, 84] which in addition to calculating variation contribution of design factors in a data allow analyzing other aspects of the data. The methods were therefore not implemented in this study.

1.5.3. Monitoring of glucose and phosphate consumption

FTIR-ATR spectra of growth media after the cultivation were used for the estimation of glucose and phosphate consumption. ATR spectra of pure water, and water solutions of pure glucose, nitrogen sources, phosphates, as well as media before cultivation were evaluated for characteristic signal of the components (S19 Fig). The peak at 1799 cm-1 was selected for the correction of baseline shift, while the peak associated with water at 1637 cm-1 was selected for peak normalization of all spectra. All growth media spectra were first baseline corrected (Anν-An1799), and then peak normalized (Anν/ An1637), where Anν is the absorbance value of sample n at a specific wavenumber. Finally, growth media spectra were corrected for water absorbance by subtracting the absorbance values of baseline- corrected and peak- normalized water spectrum from the corresponding absorbance values of the preprocessed growth media spectra. The peak associated with glucose at 1034 cm-1 (An1034) and peak associated with phosphates at 937 cm-1 (An937) were used to estimate nutrient consumption in the growth media. Phosphate consumption (PFTIR) was based on the An937 value of the growth media. Glucose consumptions (GFTIR) was calculated according to the equation:

GFTIR=AGM1034AGM937AP1034AP937

where AGM and AP are the absorbance values (at the corresponding wavenumbers) for pre-processed growth media spectrum and water solution of pure phosphate spectrum, respectively. The second term in the equation is taking into consideration that both glucose and phosphate contribute to the absorbance at 1034 cm-1 (i.e. the term is estimating phosphate contribution to the total absorbance at 1034 cm-1 based on measurement of water solution of pure phosphate). Four media samples, belonging to one biological replicate of Umbelopsis vinacea grown in ammonium sulphate with Pi8, Pi4, Pi2, and Pi1 phosphate concentrations, were excluded from the analysis due to a technical error in the preparation of the samples for the FTIR measurements.

2. Results

2.1. Growth characteristics of Mucoromycota fungi under different nutrient conditions

2.1.1. Biomass production and pH

Two types of nitrogen (N) sources, yeast extract (YE) and ammonium sulphate (AS), and six concentrations of inorganic phosphorus (Pi) were applied to study the effect of N source and Pi level on the nutrient-induced co-production of high-value metabolites–lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates, in Mucoromycota fungi.

Fig 1A shows the effect of yeast extract- complex organic multi-component substrate containing both nitrogen and phosphorus, on the cultivation of Mucoromycota fungi under different Pi levels. Results indicate that the addition of inorganic phosphorus could be neglected, since it does not have any significant effect on the biomass production. Yeast extract contains approximately 2.5% of total phosphorus. This amount corresponds to approx. 15% in terms of total P contained in added phosphates salts in the lowest examined Pi condition- Pi0.25. The highest biomass yield (18.92–23.67 g/L) was observed for Umbelopsis vinacea on both types of nitrogen sources (Fig 1). In case of YE-Pi medium, high Umbelopsis vinacea biomass yield was obtained for a wide range of phosphorus concentrations (Pi0.5 –Pi4), while on AS-Pi media Pi2 and Pi4 concentrations showed the highest biomass yield. This indicates that Umbelopsis vinacea requires quite high concentration of phosphorus for optimal growth in ammonium sulphate media under nitrogen-limited conditions. The lowest biomass yield was obtained for Mortierella alpina on both YE–(5.55–6.10 g/L) and AS-based (0.90–7.03 g/L) media. The biomass yield for Mucor circinelloides, Absidia glauca, Lichthemia corymbifera, and Amylomyces rouxii was in a range from 8.52 to 12.92 g/L when grown on yeast extract, and from 2.41 to 12.34 g/L when grown on ammonium sulphate. Cunninghamella blakesleeana, Rhizopus stolonifer and Mortierella hyalina had biomass yields from 4.28 to 9.20 g/L when grown on YE-Pi media, and from 2.11 to 10.05 g/L when grown on AS-Pi media (Fig 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Biomass yield for Mucoromycota fungi grown in media with (A) yeast extract (YE) and (B) ammonium sulphate (AS) under different Pi concentrations. Different colors correspond to different Pi concentrations (Table 2). Absidia glauca- AGL, Amylomyces rouxii- ARO, Cunninghamella blakesleeana- CBL, Lichtheimia corymbifera- LCO, Mortierella alpina- MAL, Mortierella hyalina- MHY, Mucor circinelloides- MCI, Rhizopus stolonifer- RST, Umbelopsis vinacea- UVI.

The use of different phosphorus (Pi) concentrations resulted in a change of the pH in the media after the cultivation for all studied fungi when ammonium sulphate was used as a nitrogen source. Low phosphorus concentrations caused a significant drop of pH in media for all fungi (Fig 2). In media with yeast extract as a nitrogen source, quite stable pH values where observed for media of several fungi throughout Pi concentration range: Lichtheimia corymbifera, Umbelopsis vinacea, Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina. Significantly lower pH values were detected for low Pi concentrations compared to the media with higher Pi concentrations for Mucor circinelloides, Absidia glauca, Cunninghamella blakesleeana, Amylomyces rouxii and Rhizopus stolonifer. Thus, YE shows higher buffering capacity than AS, which was confirmed by titration of YE-Pi0.25 and AS-Pi0.25 growth media with 1M HCl (S20 Fig).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

pH values of YE-Pi media with different phosphorus (Pi) levels after the cultivation on YE-Pi (A) and AS-Pi (B) media. The initial pH value at the start of the cultivation was 6±0.3. Different colors correspond to different Pi concentrations (Table 2). Absidia glauca- AGL, Amylomyces rouxii- ARO, Cunninghamella blakesleeana- CBL, Lichtheimia corymbifera- LCO, Mortierella alpina- MAL, Mortierella hyalina- MHY, Mucor circinelloides- MCI, Rhizopus stolonifer- RST, Umbelopsis vinacea- UVI.

2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy reveals co-production in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi

FTIR spectroscopy is a non-destructive technique that allows examining the total biochemical profile of intracellular metabolites in fungal cells, as well as extracellular metabolites, by using high-throughput screening (HTS) FTIR measurements. Moreover, monitoring of growth media components (glucose and phosphates) was obtained by using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR measurements. In infrared spectroscopy, the loss of infrared radiation due to chemical absorption is quantified. In the FTIR-HTS transmission mode, the loss of radiation due to absorption is quantified by transmitting infrared radiation through a sample and quantifying the loss of the radiation by comparing the transmitted radiation with the radiation that impinges on the sample. By covering the complete spectra range of the mid-infrared, biochemical fingerprint of all major chemical building blocks is obtained. The FTIR-HTS system employs a high-throughput setup with microplates and automated measurements allowing the automated analysis of around 180 samples in one measurement run. Relatively large variance in sample thickness results in the difference in optical path length, which can be corrected by standard pre-processing tools developed by us [80, 82]. In FTIR-ATR analysis, the infrared radiation undergoes reflection in an ATR crystal an produces an evanescent field in the sample which is located on its surface. The evanescent field is attenuated by the sample die to chemical absorption and the absorption can be quantified by relating the attenuated radiation with the radiation that is obtained in an ATR setup without a sample at the surface of the crystal. The ATR setup is characterized by a high reproducibility caused by a stable penetration depth of the IR beam into the sample, when the sample at the top of the crystal is in tight contact with the surface of the crystal. This is true for liquid and viscous samples such as the culture supernatant in our measurements. Information about intracellular and extracellular metabolites of fungal cells could be read from different spectral regions of HTS FTIR spectra (Fig 3, Table 3): (1) The region from 3010–2800 cm-1, 1800–1700 cm-1 and some single peaks related to -CH2 and -CH3 scissoring in a region ~1460 cm-1 contain detailed information about lipids. One of the most important lipids associated peaks is ~1745 cm-1 which is related to the carbonyl bond stretching in esters and indicating the lipid (acylglycerols) content in the cell. The peak around 1715 cm-1 is related to the carbonyl bond vibrations in organic acids, and the peak around 3010 cm-1 is related to = C-H stretching in lipids and indicating the unsaturation level of lipids in the cell. (2) Proteins have peaks in the region from 1700–1500 cm-1; (3) Polyphosphates– 1260–1240 cm-1 and 885–880 cm-1; (4) Glucans peaks can be found in the region 1160–1050 cm-1; (5) Chitin/chitosan shows peaks in the region 3440–3100 cm-1 and a single peak at 1377 cm-1. A more detailed overview of characteristic peaks can be found in Table 3. For the ATR FTIR monitoring of media (Fig 4), the most important peaks were related to glucose (1151, 1103, 1080, 1034 and 990 cm-1) and phosphates (1161, 1076 and 937 cm-1).

Fig 3. FTIR-HTS spectra of fungal biomass and model compounds.

Fig 3

A) Preprocessed FTIR-HTS spectra of Mucor circinelloides biomass grown on ammonium sulphate and different Pi levels. B) Preprocessed FTIR-ATR spectra of model compounds: chitin, glyceryl trioleate and sodium polyphosphate. Spectra are plotted with an offset for better viewing. Peak numbers correspond to the numbers given in Table 3.

Table 3. Peak assignments of the FTIR spectra of the fungal cells (chemical class with the predominant contribution is stated in the parenthesis).

Peak Nr. Wavenumber (cm-1) Peak assignment Reference
1 3500–3200 O-H stretching (carbohydrates) [85]
2 3275 N-H stretching (chitin/chitosan) [85]
3 3105 N-H stretching (chitin/chitosan) [85]
4 3010 = C-H stretching (lipids) [86]
5 2955 -C-H (CH3) stretching (lipids) [86]
6 2925 >CH2 of acyl chain (lipids) [86]
7 2855 -C-H (CH2) stretching (lipids) [86]
8 1745 -C = O stretching in esters (lipids) [86]
9 1680–1630 -C = O stretching, Amide I (proteins, chitin) [87, 88]
10 1530–1560 C-N-H deformation, Amide II (proteins, chitin) [88, 89]
11 1465 -C-H (CH2, CH3) bending (lipids) [86]
12 1377 -C-H (CH3) bending (chitin) [86]
13 1265 P = O stretching (polyphosphates) [66]
14 1160 C-O-C stretching in esters (lipids) [90]
14–16 1200–1000 C-O and C-O-C stretching (carbohydrates) [91]
17 885 P-O-P stretching (polyphosphates) [66]
18 725 >CH2 rocking in methylene–(CH2)n-chains (lipids) [86]

Fig 4. FTIR spectra of growth media.

Fig 4

A) Preprocessed FTIR-HTS spectra of ammonium sulphate and yeast extract growth media (both Pi1) at the end of cultivation of Mucor circinelloides, B) FTIR-ATR spectra of ammonium sulphate Pi1 growth media at the beginning and end of cultivation of Mucor circinelloides.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can provide both qualitative and quantitative measures. Quantitative analysis by FTIR requires regression onto reference data. For regression analysis often methods based on latent variables such as partial least square regression are used. As reference data for respective metabolites, e.g. chromatography analyses can be used. Qualitative measures are achieved by spectral assignments (see Fig 3 and Table 3) and by applying unsupervised multivariate data analysis tools (for example principal component analysis or ANOVA-PCA). Although FTIR spectroscopy cannot provide absolute quantifications without establishing calibration models based on reference quantitative data, a semi-quantitative analysis of ratios of chemical constituents (see Fig 13) can be obtained. Nevertheless, the biggest advantage of the FTIR approach is that it allows high-throughput screening of samples and detection of a vast range of different metabolites simultaneously within a single analytical run. Thus, it provides high precision qualitative information allowing to pre-select strains and growth conditions.

Fig 13. Estimation of the consumption of glucose and phosphate salts in the growth media after cultivation by FTIR-ATR.

Fig 13

Starting glucose concentration corresponds to the blue dashed line, final glucose concentration the blue full line and final phosphates concentration are pictured with the orange line. Figure A shows the Ye-Pi media and figure B AS-Pi media.

The FTIR spectra of Mucor circinelloides, grown on a AS nitrogen-source, illustrate the effect of phosphorus availability in media on the intracellular production of lipids, polyphosphates and chitin/chitosan (Fig 3A). Signals of these metabolites clearly correspond to the model components- chitin, glyceryl trioleate and sodium polyphosphate (Fig 3B). Mucor circinelloides showed good oleaginous properties when phosphorus was not limited (Pi1 –Pi8), as indicated by strong absorbance peaks related to acylglycerides (3010, 2925, 2854, 1743, and 725 cm-1). Moreover, an increase in the amount of phosphorus in the growth media (Pi2 –Pi8) led to increased polyphosphates accumulation in fungal cells, as indicated by the strong absorbance peaks related to polyphosphates (1265 and 883 cm-1). FTIR results clearly indicated that limitation of phosphorus availability (Pi0.25 and Pi0.5) resulted in low pH and an overproduction of chitin/chitosan which could be explained as an activation of protective mechanisms in the cell wall. The production of chitin and chitosan is strongly supported by an observation of the absorbance peaks related to these biopolymers at 3434, 3274, 3104, 1660, 1629, 1550, 1377, and 952 cm-1. FTIR-HTS spectra of all strains used in the study can be found in the supplementary materials.

The FTIR-HTS spectra of media after growth, in particular of the AS nitrogen-source media, show carbonyl peaks (at approx. 1715 cm-1) (Fig 4A). These carbonyl peaks may relate to production of organic acids coming from the Krebs cycle, for example citric acid. This is in agreement with pH measurements (Fig 2B) and with our previous studies [54], where citric acid was determined by HPLC measurements. In order to confirm this observation, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the Mucor circinelloides sectioned hyphae, obtained from the growth on ammonium sulphate media with Pi-limited and Pi-non-limited conditions, was performed (Fig 5).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of cross sectioned Mucor circinelloides (MCI) hyphae grown on AS media with Pi0.5 (limited) (A) and AS Pi1 (non-limited) (B) conditions. Green arrows indicate cell wall and orange arrows lipid bodies. Images are taken by Lene Cecilie Hermansen, Imaging center NMBU.

As it can be seen from TEM images, the cell wall of Mucor circinelloides hyphae grown on Pi-limited condition (Fig 5A) is much thicker than the cell wall of the hyphae from Pi-non-limited condition (Fig 5B), while size and number of lipid bodies are smaller in a Pi-limited than in Pi-non-limited conditions. This indicates the increase in the cell wall components–chitin/chitosan and decrease in the lipid accumulation for the hyphae obtained from Pi-limited conditions is in accordance with the FTIR-HTS spectroscopy results reported above.

2.2.1. The influence of N-source and Pi-levels on the co-production in Mucoromycota fungi

A nitrogen (N) source used for the fungal fermentation can be organic or inorganic. In this study, yeast extract (YE) was used as an organic N-source and ammonium sulphate (AS) as an inorganic N-source. PCA analysis of FTIR-HTS spectral data was performed to reveal the biochemical composition of the samples.

The PCA score plot of the first and second component of FTIR-HTS spectra of fungal biomass grown on YE is shown in Fig 6A, the corresponding loadings are shown in Fig 6C. The PCA score plot shows clear strain-specific clustering. Higher components did not show relevant trends related to the main biomass constituents. This indicates that each fungus has its strain-specific biochemical composition when grown on YE. Different Pi concentrations are not influencing these strain-specific fingerprints considerably. The loadings in Fig 6C show that the strain-specific differences in biomass composition are mostly determined by the ratio of main cellular components, specifically lipids (3010, 2925, 2855 cm-1), polyphosphates (1265, 885 cm-1), chitin/chitosan (3434, 3275, 3105, 1660, 1629, 1550, 1377, and 952 cm-1) and proteins (1680–1630, 1530–1560 cm-1). For example, biomass of Mucor circinelloides and Amylomyces rouxii have high phosphate (polyphosphates) to nitrogen (chitin, chitosan and proteins) ratio, compared to Cunninghamella blakesleeana and Lichtheimia corymbifera. Compared to all of them, spectra of Umbelopsis vinacea show the highest lipids-to-proteins ratio.

The PCA score plot of the first and second component of FTIR-HTS spectra of fungal biomass grown on AS is shown in Fig 6B and the corresponding loadings are shown in Fig 6D. In contrast to the FTIR spectra of fungi grown on YE, the FTIR spectra of fungi grown on AS do not show any clustering with respect to fungal strain (Fig 6B). However, unlike for the YE-Pi media, strong biochemical differences for fungi grown in AS-Pi at different phosphorus levels can be clearly seen. The low effect of phosphorus on the biochemical composition of the strains when grown in yeast extract may be explained by the fact that yeast extract is a complex and rich source of not only nitrogen, sulphur, vitamins and minerals, but also of organic phosphorus. Due to a relatively large starting amount of organic phosphorus in the yeast extract, variation in the concentration of the inorganic phosphorus may not have strong effects on fungal growth in the YE media. In the case of AS-based media, when Pi was the only source of phosphorus for fungal growth, considerable changes in fungal cell chemistry were observed when phosphorus levels were changed. Therefore, biochemical differences in the biomass were quite pronounced at already low Pi concentrations (Fig 6A and 6B).

PCA of FTIR-HTS spectra using specific spectral regions that are characteristic for lipids, polyphosphates and chitin/chitosan was performed in order to evaluate the co-production of these components in Mucoromycota fungi (Figs 7, 9 and 11). In order to have a deeper understanding on the influence of variations in N-source, Pi concentration and N-Pi interaction on the co-production of lipids, polyP and chitin/chitosan in Mucoromycota fungi, Analysis of Variance PCA (ANOVA-PCA) was performed following the approach by Harrington [83]. The analysis of variation in the FTIR-HTS spectra introduced by the different design factors was done using respective spectral regions (Figs 8, 10 and 12).

Fig 8. Variation contribution (%) from changes in N, Pi and N-Pi interaction on the lipid region (3020–2819 cm-1, 1760–1726 cm-1, 1475–1375 cm-1, 1160–1149 cm-1, 730–715 cm-1) of FTIR-HTS spectra.

Fig 8

Variation contributions due to changes in N and Pi alone are presented in the first two rows (Var N and Var P), whereas contribution from N-Pi interaction (Int) is presented in the last row (Var Int).

Fig 10. Variation contribution (%) from changes in N, Pi and N-Pi interaction on the polyphosphate region (1301–1203 cm-1, 925–842 cm-1) of FTIR HTS spectra.

Fig 10

Variation contributions due to N and Pi alone are presented in the first two rows (Var N and Var P), whereas contribution from N-Pi interaction (Int) is presented in the last row (Var Int).

Fig 12. Variation contribution (%) from changes in N, Pi and N-Pi interaction on the chitin/chitosan region (3457–3417 cm-1, 3293–3251 cm-1, 3133–3081 cm-1, 1639–1623 cm-1, 1392–1346 cm-1, 962–941 cm-1) of FTIR HTS spectra.

Fig 12

Variation contributions due to N and Pi alone are presented in the first two rows (Var N and Var P), whereas contribution from N-Pi interaction (Int) is presented in the last row (Var Int).

In Fig 7A, the score values of the first principal component of the lipid region are shown for all strains and the corresponding loading vector is shown in Fig 7C. From the spread of the score values of the first PC, we can see that availability of inorganic phosphorus did not influence the accumulation of lipids in Umbelopsis vinacea, Mortierella hyalina, Mucor circineloides, and only some minor effects could be seen for Mortierella alpina (Fig 7A). Thus, results indicate that addition of inorganic phosphorus might be not needed, when complex organic multi-component substrates containing both nitrogen and phosphorus are used for the production of lipids by Mucoromycota fungi. In this case, the addition of Pi does not have any significant effect on the biomass and lipid yield. Moreover, in some cases high levels of phosphorus can negatively influence accumulation of lipids, as it was observed for Cunninghamella blakesleeana, Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca (Fig 7A) which is explained by the growth inhibition effect of high Pi-levels of these fungal strains and the accumulation of polyphosphates in case of Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca. The observed variation in lipid content of Rhizopus stolonifer which is not correlated with Pi availability can be explained by a low relative amount of lipids in Rhizopus stolonifer biomass, as shown in Fig 6A.

The score values of the first principal component of the PCA of the lipid region of FTIR spectra of AS-Pi grown fungi is shown in Fig 7B and the corresponding loading vector in Fig 7D. The spread of the score values indicates that lipid accumulation in Absidia glauca, Amylomyces rouxii and Mucor circinelloides was stronger influenced by the Pi level than in other fungi. The decrease in Pi in AS-Pi media led to the low lipid content for all fungi except Cunninghamella blakesleeana (Fig 7B). Mucor circinelloides showed the highest decrease in the lipid accumulation at low Pi levels (Pi0.5 and Pi0.25). The reason for this is that both cell growth as well as the lipid accumulation process involves a set of phosphorylated molecules, the synthesis of which could be inhibited under Pi-limited conditions. Generally, Pi concentrations Pi1, Pi2 and Pi4 where better suited for the lipid accumulation in Mucoromycota fungi (Fig 7B). Based on the biomass yield results, the optimal phosphorus amount for the fungal growth in growth media that are poorer in nutrients is Pi2 for Mortierella. Taking in consideration that Mortierella are producing high value polyunsaturated fatty acids, this finding has importance for optimization of industrial bioprocesses. Lichtheimia corymbifera did not show any specific trend in lipid content with respect to the amount of Pi neither in YE-Pi, nor AS-Pi media.

ANOVA model for spectral data using the lipid region (Fig 8) (3020–2819 cm-1, 1760–1726 cm-1, 1475–1375 cm-1, 1160–1149 cm-1, 730–715 cm-1) showed that variation in N, Pi and N-Pi interaction influences fungal lipids in different ways depending on the fungal strain, and the N-source variation had the least influence on the lipid accumulation in all fungi except Mortierella hyalina (Fig 8). For Absidia glauca, Amylomyces rouxii and Cunninghamella blakesleeana, variation of nitrogen, phosphorus and their combination influenced the lipid production to the same extent. For Lichtheimia corymbifera and Umbelopsis vinacea there was a slightly higher influence of the N-Pi interaction than of each of the nutrients separately. The lipid production of Mucor circinelloides and Rhizopus stolonifer was not strongly affected by the different nitrogen sources, contrary to Mortierella hyalina, where the nitrogen source played an important role in lipid accumulation. Variation of phosphorus caused the biggest changes in the lipid production of Mortierella alpina.

The co-production of polyphosphate (polyP) and lipids was studied by PCA analysis of the spectral regions of HTS-FTIR spectra of fungi that have characteristic bands from polyphosphate (1301–1203 cm-1, 925–842 cm-1). The score values of the first principal component of the PCA of the of the spectral regions that have characteristic bands from polyphosphate of fungi grown on YE-Pi media is shown in Fig 9A and the corresponding loading vector in Fig 9C. It was observed that Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor circinelloides, Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca grown in YE-Pi and AS-Pi media show significant polyP accumulation along with lipid accumulation when a high level of Pi was used (Fig 9).

A co-production of polyP in addition to lipids could not be observed for Mortierella fungi and Umbelopsis vinacea. While, some polyP accumulation was observed for Umbelopsis vinacea with low phosphorus in AS-Pi media., probably due to the high salinity. Specifically, relatively high salinity was observed when phosphorus media were depleted, since KCl and NaCl were used to keep the same K/Na ratio in phosphorus limited media as for the standard conditions. Polyphosphates are reported to be involved in the adaptation mechanisms of microorganisms to stress conditions, namely temperature, radiation, or salinity [92, 93].

By analyzing the variance contribution using ANOVA model in the polyP-related spectral region (Fig 10) (1301–1203 cm-1, 925–842 cm-1) it was possible to identify polyP-accumulating strains. Increased variation in the polyphosphate region of FTIR-HTS spectra was observed for Amylomyces rouxii, Cunninghamella blakesleana, Mucor circinelloides and most of all Rhizopus stolonifer, for which an extraordinary correlation between variation in phosphorus amount in the growth media and intracellular polyphosphates was already noticed in the PCA (Fig 6, Fig 9). For these strains, the phosphorus variation has much more influence on changes in the polyP region of spectra than variation in nitrogen source. The lowest effect of Pi variation was observed for non-polyP accumulating fungi Mortierella hyalina and Umbelopsis vinacea (Fig 10). The influence of N-source variation was stronger in the case of spectral region related to polyP than the lipid region for Absidia glauca, Mortierella hyalina, Lichtheimia corymbifera and Umbelopsis vinacea (Fig 10). In addition, it could be seen that N-Pi interaction has a higher influence on polyP than on the lipid spectral region. This is associated mainly with Pi variation which occurred in AS-Pi media.

In Fig 11, PCA results (first principal component) are shown for the spectral regions 3457–3417 cm-1, 3293–3251 cm-1, 3133–3081 cm-1, 1639–1623 cm-1, 1392–1346 cm-1, 962–941 cm-1, which show characteristic for chitin/chitosan region of the FTIR-HTS spectra of fungi grown on YE-Pi and AS-Pi. In Fig 11A and Fig 11C the first score and loading are shown for the PCA results for fungi grown on AS-Pi media with Pi concentrations Pi0.5 and Pi0.25. The loading plot (Fig 11C) indicates that chitin and chitosan content increases from the left to the right. In Fig 11B and Fig 11D, the corresponding score plot and loading plot are shown for fungi grown on AS-Pi media. From the score plot in Fig 11B we can see that Mucor circinelloides, Rhizopus stolonifer, Amylomyces rouxii, Absidia glauca and Lichtheimia corymbifera grown on AS-Pi media with Pi concentrations Pi0.5 and Pi0.25 showed increased content of chitin/chitosan (Fig 11B) while the content of lipids was reduced (Fig 7B). In addition to lipids and polyP, several Mucoromycota fungi were able to overproduce chitin/chitosan under phosphorus limited conditions (Fig 11B).

ANOVA model for the spectral region related to chitin/chitosan (3457–3417 cm-1, 3293–3251 cm-1, 3133–3081 cm-1, 1639–1623 cm-1, 1392–1346 cm-1, 962–941 cm-1) showed that nature of N-source may have a strong effect for Absidia glauca and Mortierella hyalina, while variation in the concentration of Pi and N-Pi interaction did not show any significant influence for these fungi (Fig 12). Generally, it could be concluded that the nature of N-source is possibly important for chitin/chitosan content for most of the studied fungi, while the influence from N-Pi interaction seemed to be least important. Variation in Pi affected chitin/chitosan content to some extend for Amylomyces rouxii, Cunninghamella blakesleana, Mucor circinelloides and to a high extend for Rhizopus stolonifer (Fig 12). Chitin/chitosan content in Amylomyces rouxii was equally affected by the change in N-source and Pi concentrations, while for Rhizopus stolonifer little effect was observed from the N-source and most of the changes where related to Pi variation.

Absidia glauca and Lichtheimia corymbifera modified their cell wall mostly due to a change in nitrogen source, while variations in phosphorus changed to the chitin/chitosan production only weakly. In contrary, the variation in Pi amount induced the chitin/chitosan production in Rhizopus stolonifer and just small effect was observed for the contribution of different nitrogen sources. This corresponds to the biomass yield results, where there were no big changes observed with different nitrogen sources, even for the phosphorus limited conditions in the AS-Pi media. For Amylomyces rouxii and Mucor circinelloides, variation of Pi and N have similar effects on the chitin/chitosan production.

2.2.2. Monitoring of nutrients consumption by FTIR spectroscopy

FTIR-ATR spectra of the growth media after cultivation were used to evaluate the consumption of glucose and phosphate salts (Fig 13). We have shown recently that FTIR-ATR, in combination with multivariate statistical analyses, can be used for analysis of growth media and extracellular metabolites in screening and monitoring of fungal bioprocesses [54]. Here a univariate approach was used with only one variable per analyte (1034 and 937 cm-1 for glucose and phosphates, respectively) in order to create a robust model for media monitoring. As shown in Fig 13, this approach allows to estimate concentrations of main nutrients in the media.

The results show that the glucose consumption corresponds to the biomass production (Fig 1). For Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina, no growth was observed with the Pi8 amount, therefore the glucose content in the growth media after the cultivation was the highest. For AS-Pi media, more glucose was consumed at higher Pi concentrations (Pi1 –Pi4). For example, the double amount of biomass was produced for Mortierella hyalina at Pi2, compared to Pi0.25 (Fig 1), and this clearly corresponded to the lowest glucose content. For YE-Pi media, similar biomass yields were obtained irrespective of Pi concentrations, and thus the glucose consumption showed no trend. Umbelopsis vinacea utilized nearly all glucose available, which again corresponded to the high biomass yield.

3. Discussion

All studied Mucoromycota fungi were able to grow in media with different nitrogen sources and inorganic phosphorus concentrations, except Mortierella species for which the high concentration of inorganic phosphorus (Pi8) inhibited the growth completely (Fig 1). FTIR-ATR spectra of the growth media after cultivation were used to evaluate the consumption of main nutrients–glucose and phosphate salts and generally, the glucose consumption corresponds to the biomass production (Fig 1, Fig 13). In general, when yeast extract was used as a nitrogen source, no significant changes in biomass yield for different concentrations of inorganic phosphorus were observed. Moreover, biomass yield for fungi grown on yeast extract and low concentrations of inorganic phosphorus was higher compared to when ammonium sulphate was used as nitrogen source. This was mainly due to the fact, that yeast extract is a chemically complex substrate which is a source of not only nitrogen but also phosphorus, sulphur, vitamins, amino acids and trace elements. Therefore, variation in the level of inorganic phosphorus showed small effect on the fungal growth when yeast extract was used as a nitrogen source. This indicates that usage of complex N-source substrates, containing nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients for the enrichment of rest materials could be beneficial and sustainable. Such cultivation would provide relatively stable biomass yields without addition of inorganic phosphorus, which is a world limited chemical component. In addition, cultivation of all fungal strains in the presence of yeast extract and various inorganic phosphorus as accompanied by relative stable pH that resulted in high biomass yield.

Combining ammonium sulphate as a nitrogen source with different concentrations of inorganic phosphorus, showed that Pi- requirements for optimal growth varied for different fungi: (1) Rhizopus stolonifer exhibited relatively uniform biomass yield within the used phosphorus concentration range; (2) Mucor circinelloides, Absidia glauca, Cunninghamella blakesleeana and Amylomyces rouxii showed the optimal growth and the highest biomass yield within relatively broad concentration range Pi1 –Pi8; (3) Umbelopsis vinacea had the highest biomass yield within more narrow concentration range Pi2 –Pi4; (4) Lichtheimia corymbifera, Mortierella alpina and Mortierella hyalina produced the highest biomass yield at Pi2 concentration, and, in case of Mortierella hyalina, the biomass yield was double compared to Pi4 and Pi1. Overall, the biomass yield for fungi grown in media with the high phosphorus levels was comparable to the yeast extract media, and in some cases, even higher biomass yields were obtained. The biomass yield clearly showed that the majority of strains, aside from Rhizopus stolonifer, have strongly inhibited growth in the low phosphorus media.

When the biomass yield and pH results are compared, it is apparent that low pH caused by the low Pi concentrations inhibited fungal growth. Fungal lipids are accumulated when nitrogen depletion leads to decrease of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) level. This results in the inactivation of isocitrate dehydrogenase and causes the accumulation of citric acid. Citric acid is further converted by ATP citrate lyase to AcetylCoA, which is a precursor for the synthesis of fatty acids (Wynn et al., 2001). Accumulation of citric acid, which was detected by FTIR and HPLC in our previous study (Kosa et al., 2017b), is therefore expected to some extend in the lipogenesis in oleaginous fungi. Other organic acids coming from glycolysis and the Krebs cycle, such as pyruvic or fumaric acid, might be present as well and contribute to the acidic pH. Although decrease in pH is observed in the YE-Pi media as well, the buffering capacity of YE is higher than AS (S20 Fig). Some of the fungal strains activated the protective mechanisms against acidic stress, leading to increased chitin/chitosan production in the cell wall, as it was reported above (Figs 3, 5, 6B and 11). Further studies under pH-controlled conditions are needed to clarify the contribution of low Pi to chitin/chitosan overproduction.

FTIR-HTS spectra of fungi grown on yeast extract and different Pi concentrations showed that Mucor circinelloides, Umbelopsis vinacea, Mortierella hyalina, Mortierella alpina and Absida glauca had high lipid content in the biomass. The highest lipid content was observed for Umbelopsis vinacea (Fig 6). Considering high biomass yield and lipid accumulation, Umbelopsis vinacea could be considered as one of the best lipid producers with the potential for industrial application. Several fungi, namely Absidia glauca, Rhizopus stolonifer, Amylomyces rouxii, Mucor circinelloides, showed accumulation of polyphosphates in addition to lipids when grown on yeast extract. Mucor circinelloides showed the highest content of polyphosphate co-produced along with the relatively high content of lipids (Fig 6). The co-production of lipids along with polyphosphates and chitosan by Mucor circinelloides could be considered as one of the co-production concepts for elevating level of sustainability for fungal lipid production, as three products would be produced in a single fermentation process.

PCA of the lipid region of FTIR-HTS spectra showed that when yeast extract was used as N-source, phosphorus availability did not affect the accumulation of lipids in Umbelopsis vinacea, Mortierella hyalina, and Mucor circineloides, and just minimal effect could be seen in case of Mortierella alpina. This indicates that for the biotechnological production of lipids by Mucoromycota fungi, it would be possible to exclude or limit addition of inorganic phosphorus without any strong effect on biomass and lipid yield when a rich N-source is used. This is of particular importance for reduction of costs in production of lipids for biodiesel. Accumulation of lipids by Rhizopus stolonifer, Cunninghamella blakesleeana, Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca was negatively affected when a high concentration of inorganic phosphorus was present in the growth media containing either yeast extract or ammonium sulphate (Fig 7). This can be explained by the ability of co-production of lipids and polyphosphates of these fungi. Polyphosphates were accumulated during the exponential growth phase and therefore the lipid accumulation might have been suppressed, since both, polyphosphates and lipids serve as energy storage in the fungal cells. The strongest effect of phosphorus was detected when fungi were grown on ammonium sulphate-based media, where the decrease in phosphorus availability led to a lower lipid content for all fungi except Cunninghamella blakesleeana. Pi2 condition doubled the biomass yield of Mortierella fungi known as excellent producers of high- valued polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Further, FTIR-HTS data were utilized to study nutrient-induced co-production strategies for concomitant production of lipids, polyphosphate and chitin/chitosan in Mucoromycota fungi. A co-production of polyphosphate and lipids was observed for fungi Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor circinelloides, Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca grown in both yeast- and ammonium-based media (Fig 6). A big increase in the polyphosphate accumulation was observed in media with the high level of phosphorus (Pi2 –Pi8). Thus, these fungi could be considered as promising strains from the view of increasing sustainability in microbial-lipid biorefinery and phosphorus recovery. The co-production of polyphosphate in addition to lipids was not detected for Mortierella fungi and Umbelopsis vinacea. The co-production of chitin/chitosan generally occured in all types of media, since these polymers are principle structural components of Mucoromycota fungi cell wall. The main reason for the overproduction of chitin/chitosan accompanied with the decreased lipid production in AS-Pi media under low Pi levels could be an acidic stress caused by the low Pi concentrations. The obtained results are in accordance with results reported in literature showing that chitin overproduction in the cell wall of Mucoromycota fungi is induced by acidic pH of the growth media [94]. Taking in account high biomass yield, the total chitin/chitosan yield in YE-Pi media could be higher than in AS-Pi media with low Pi levels. When using inorganic nitrogen source, it is possible to stimulate the overproduction of chitin/chitosan in some Mucoromycota fungi by limiting inorganic phosphorus. This finding is in agreement with chitosan yield optimization in Mucor indicus, where phosphate-free medium was reported to result in the highest chitosan production [95].

Production of chitin and chitosan from fungal mycelium has significant advantages in comparison to traditional way from crustacean waste. For example, microbial production is not dependent on a season and fishing industry, it does not require demineralization process, and the composition of chitin and chitosan is more consistent compared to crustacean waste materials [96, 97]. Chitin/chitosan creates side-stream product and additional value for the process. Although optimization of the biomass yield for chitin/chitosan and lipid co-production was not the primary goal of this study, there is a potential to enhance the yields by modification of C/N ratio, pH, aeration, cultivation temperature and time [22, 98, 99].

Generally, the co-production concept of bioproduction in some cases may lead to the use of different downstream processes, while in the case of oleaginous fungal biomass, co-produced lipids and chitin/chitosan are located in different cell compartments (lipids in lipid droplets, chitin/chitosan in cell wall) and therefore they can be separated relatively easy by using, for example, solvent-based or super critical fluid extraction. Lipids and chitin/chitosan are carbon-based products. Therefore, achieving a high yield of lipids will be at the expense of the yield of chitin/chitosan and vice versa. However, it is important to note that chitin/chitosan are the principle components of the fungal cell wall. Thus, even with the highest possible lipid yield, the cell wall, which is an essential part of the fungal cells, will always constitute a rest product after lipid extraction. The separation of polyphosphate could be challenging since its located both intracellularly and in the cell wall. Further, it’s important to note that co-production concept is particularly beneficial for producing microbial biomass to be consumed as a whole, as for example fungal biomass enriched in lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates could be particularly beneficial as a whole for fish feed applications.

4. Conclusion

The presented study reveals a nutrient-induced co-production of industrially important metabolites, namely lipids, polyphosphates and chitin/chitosan in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi using FTIR spectroscopy. The co-production was shown to depend sensitively on the presence and concentration of macronutrients in the substrates, namely six different phosphorus levels and two nitrogen sources (yeast extract and ammonium sulphate). Since the co-production of different high-value products is closely related to the sustainability of the process, our study can be considered as an assessment of the biotechnological potential of the nine different oleaginous Mucoromycota grown on nitrogen-limited conditions. Ammonium sulphate growth media enabled full control over the media composition, and thus the overview of the effect of different phosphorus levels on the fungal growth and metabolism.

As polyphosphate accumulating fungi, we have identified Mucor circinelloides, Amylomyces rouxii, Rhizopus stolonifer and Absidia glauca. These fungi showed a potential for the co-production of lipids and polyphosphates. Further, phosphorus limiting conditions led to low pH which induced over co-production of chitin/chitosan for Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor circinelloides, Amylomyces rouxii and Absidia glauca in AS-Pi media. In addition, Rhizopus stolonifer showed an obvious advantage in managing Pi deficiency, since its growth in AS-Pi was not remarkably affected by phosphorus limitation. Mucor circinelloides has a high biotechnological potential for the co-production of three products, namely chitin/chitosan, lipids and polyphosphates in a single cultivation. Umbelopsis vinacea was identified as the best biomass and lipid producer, the yields were almost twice as high as for the other studied fungi. These findings are important for developing sustainable modern microbial lipid biorefineries. This study demonstrates that Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy allows to monitor any chemical bioprocess compound in media and cells without tedious sample preparation and extraction steps and is a powerful tool that can be used for developing and monitoring novel biotechnological processes.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Absidia glauca (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Absidia glauca (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Amylomyces rouxii (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S4 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Amylomyces rouxii (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S5 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Cunninghamella blakesleeana (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S6 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Cunninghamella blakesleeana (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S7 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Lichtheimia corymbifera (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S8 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Lichtheimia corymbifera (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S9 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella alpina (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S10 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella alpina (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S11 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mucor circinelloides (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S12 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mucor circinelloides (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S13 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella hyalina (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S14 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella hyalina (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S15 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Rhizopus stolonifer (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S16 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Rhizopus stolonifer (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S17 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Umbelopsis vinacea (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S18 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Umbelopsis vinacea (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

(DOCX)

S19 Fig. FTIR-ATR spectra of glucose, ammonium sulphate (AS), phosphate salts, yeast extract (YE) and growth media AS-Pi4 before the cultivation.

(DOCX)

S20 Fig

Titration of 100 ml not autoclaved YE-Pi0.25 (blue) and AS-Pi0.25 (red) with 1M HCl confirmed the buffering properties of yeast extract.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. FTIR raw spectral data: HTS spectra of biomass, ATR spectra of culture supernatant, ATR spectra of reference materials, HTS spectra of culture supernatant MCI_YE_Pi1; MCI_AS_Pi1.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Lene Cecilie Hermansen from Imaging Centre at NMBU for the help with the TEM measurements.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by the Research Council of Norway - FMETEKN Grant, project number 257622; BIONÆR Grant, project numbers 268305, 305215; DAAD Grant, project number 309220 and by the Slovak Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport- grant VEGA 1/0323/19. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cherubini F. The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy conversion management. 2010;51(7):1412–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gupta VK, Kubicek CP, Berrin J-G, Wilson DW, Couturier M, Berlin A, et al. Fungal enzymes for bio-products from sustainable and waste biomass. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2016;41(7):633–45. 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karimi S, Mahboobi Soofiani N, Mahboubi A, Taherzadeh M. Use of organic wastes and industrial by-products to produce filamentous fungi with potential as aqua-feed ingredients. Sustainability. 2018;10(9):3296. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.André A, Diamantopoulou P, Philippoussis A, Sarris D, Komaitis M, Papanikolaou S, et al. Biotechnological conversions of bio-diesel derived waste glycerol into added-value compounds by higher fungi: production of biomass, single cell oil and oxalic acid. Industrial Crops. 2010;31(2):407–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meyer V, Andersen MR, Brakhage AA, Braus GH, Caddick MX, Cairns TC, et al. Current challenges of research on filamentous fungi in relation to human welfare and a sustainable bio-economy: a white paper. Fungal biology and biotechnology. 2016;3(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferreira JA, Lennartsson PR, Edebo L, Taherzadeh MJ. Zygomycetes-based biorefinery: Present status and future prospects. Bioresource technology. 2013;135:523–32. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ochsenreither K, Glück C, Stressler T, Fischer L, Syldatk C. Production Strategies and Applications of Microbial Single Cell Oils. 2016;7(1539). 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vongsangnak W, Ruenwai R, Tang X, Hu X, Zhang H, Shen B, et al. Genome-scale analysis of the metabolic networks of oleaginous Zygomycete fungi. Gene. 2013;521(1):180–90. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ratledge C. Fatty acid biosynthesis in microorganisms being used for single cell oil production. Biochimie. 2004;86(11):807–15. 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kosa G, Zimmermann B, Kohler A, Ekeberg D, Afseth NK, Mounier J, et al. High-throughput screening of Mucoromycota fungi for production of low-and high-value lipids. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2018;11(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sakuradani E, Shimizu S. Single cell oil production by Mortierella alpina. Journal of biotechnology. 2009;144(1):31–6. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shinmen Y, Shimizu S, Akimoto K, Kawashima H, Yamada H. Production of arachidonic acid by Mortierella fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1989;31(1):11–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khot M, Kamat S, Zinjarde S, Pant A, Chopade B, RaviKumar A. Single cell oil of oleaginous fungi from the tropical mangrove wetlands as a potential feedstock for biodiesel. Microbial Cell Factories. 2012;11(1):71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ratledge C. Single cell oils for the 21st century In: Cohen ZR, C., editor. Single cell oils: microbial and algal oils: Elsevier; 2010. p. 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yadav AN, Mishra S, Singh S, Gupta A. Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi: Springer; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santek MI, Beluhan S, Santek BJAiB, Bioenergy. Production of microbial lipids from lignocellulosic biomass. 2018:137–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zininga JT, Puri AK, Govender A, Singh S, Permaul KJBt. Concomitant production of chitosan and lipids from a newly isolated Mucor circinelloides ZSKP for biodiesel production. Bioresource technology. 2019;272:545–51. 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liao W, Liu Y, Frear C, Chen S. Co-production of fumaric acid and chitin from a nitrogen-rich lignocellulosic material–dairy manure–using a pelletized filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae ATCC 20344. Bioresource technology. 2008;99(13):5859–66. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, Liao W, Chen S-l. Co‐production of lactic acid and chitin using a pelletized filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae cultured on cull potatoes and glucose. Journal of applied microbiology. 2008;105(5):1521–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03913.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Satari B, Karimi K, Taherzadeh M, Zamani A. Co-production of fungal biomass derived constituents and ethanol from citrus wastes free sugars without auxiliary nutrients in airlift bioreactor. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016;17(3):302 10.3390/ijms17030302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Raghukumar S. Fungi in coastal and oceanic marine ecosystems: Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tan SC, Tan TK, Wong SM, Khor E. The chitosan yield of zygomycetes at their optimum harvesting time. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1996;30(4):239–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bartnicki-Garcia S, Lippman E. Fungal morphogenesis: cell wall construction in Mucor rouxii. Science. 1969;165(3890):302–4. 10.1126/science.165.3890.302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Werner TP, Amrhein N, Freimoser FM, Biology. Specific localization of inorganic polyphosphate (poly P) in fungal cell walls by selective extraction and immunohistochemistry. Fungal Genetics Biology. 2007;44(9):845–52. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beever RE, Burns D. Phosphorus uptake, storage and utilization by fungi Advances in botanical research. 8: Elsevier; 1981. p. 127–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ye Y, Gan J, Hu B. Screening of phosphorus-accumulating fungi and their potential for phosphorus removal from waste streams. Applied biochemistry biotechnology. 2015;177(5):1127–36. 10.1007/s12010-015-1801-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.El Wali M, Golroudbary SR, Kraslawski A. Impact of recycling improvement on the life cycle of phosphorus. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2019;27(5):1219–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Appels L, Degrève J, Van der Bruggen B, Van Impe J, Dewil R. Influence of low temperature thermal pre-treatment on sludge solubilisation, heavy metal release and anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology. 2010;101(15):5743–8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Ridgway D, Gu T, Moo-Young M. Bioprocessing strategies to improve heterologous protein production in filamentous fungal fermentations. Biotechnology advances. 2005;23(2):115–29. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu J, Peng C, Ji X-J, You J, Cong L, Ouyang P, et al. Fermentation Characteristics of Mortierella alpina in Response to Different Nitrogen Sources. Applied Biochemistry Biotechnology advances. 2011;164(7):979–90. 10.1007/s12010-011-9189-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Papanikolaou S, Galiotou‐Panayotou M, Fakas S, Komaitis M, Aggelis G. Lipid production by oleaginous Mucorales cultivated on renewable carbon sources. European Journal of Lipid Science Technology. 2007;109(11):1060–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Botha A, Strauss T, Kock J, Pohl C, Coetzee D. Carbon source utilization and γ-linolenic acid production by Mucoralean fungi. Systematic applied microbiology. 1997;20(1):165–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lindberg A-M, Hansson L. Production of ψ-linolenic acid by the fungus Mucor rouxii on cheap nitrogen and carbon sources. Applied microbiology biotechnology advances. 1991;36(1):26–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lima MABd, Nascimento AEd, Wd Souza, Fukushima K, Campos-Takaki GMd. Effects of phosphorus on polyphosphate accumulation by Cunninghamella elegans. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2003;34:363–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schmitt J, Flemming H-C. FTIR-spectroscopy in microbial and material analysis. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 1998;41(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shapaval V, Schmitt J, Møretrø T, Suso H, Skaar I, Åsli A, et al. Characterization of food spoilage fungi by FTIR spectroscopy. Journal of applied microbiology. 2013;114(3):788–96. 10.1111/jam.12092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shapaval V, Møretrø T, Suso HP, Åsli AW, Schmitt J, Lillehaug D, et al. A high‐throughput microcultivation protocol for FTIR spectroscopic characterization and identification of fungi. Journal of biophotonics. 2010;3(8‐9):512–21. 10.1002/jbio.201000014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Santos C, Fraga ME, Kozakiewicz Z, Lima N. Fourier transform infrared as a powerful technique for the identification and characterization of filamentous fungi and yeasts. Research in microbiology. 2010;161(2):168–75. 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salman A, Tsror L, Pomerantz A, Moreh R, Mordechai S, Huleihel M. FTIR spectroscopy for detection and identification of fungal phytopathogenes. Spectroscopy. 2010;24(3–4):261–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lecellier A, Gaydou V, Mounier J, Hermet A, Castrec L, Barbier G, et al. Implementation of an FTIR spectral library of 486 filamentous fungi strains for rapid identification of molds. Food microbiology. 2015;45:126–34. 10.1016/j.fm.2014.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shaligram NS, Bule M, Bhambure R, Singhal RS, Singh SK, Szakacs G, et al. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous extract from the compactin producing fungal strain. Process biochemistry. 2009;44(8):939–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Erukhimovitch V, Pavlov V, Talyshinsky M, Souprun Y, Huleihel M. FTIR microscopy as a method for identification of bacterial and fungal infections. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2005;37(5):1105–8. 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kamnev AAJJoS. FTIR spectroscopic studies of bacterial cellular responses to environmental factors, plant-bacterial interactions and signalling. 2008;22(2–3):83–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tang M, McEwen GD, Wu Y, Miller CD, Zhou AJ. Characterization and analysis of mycobacteria and Gram-negative bacteria and co-culture mixtures by Raman microspectroscopy, FTIR, and atomic force microscopy. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2013;405(5):1577–91. 10.1007/s00216-012-6556-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vongsvivut J, Heraud P, Gupta A, Puri M, McNaughton D, Barrow CJ. FTIR microspectroscopy for rapid screening and monitoring of polyunsaturated fatty acid production in commercially valuable marine yeasts and protists. Analyst. 2013;138(20):6016–31. 10.1039/c3an00485f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Corte L, Tiecco M, Roscini L, Germani R, Cardinali G. FTIR analysis of the metabolomic stress response induced by N-alkyltropinium bromide surfactants in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2014;116:761–71. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Correa-García S, Bermúdez-Moretti M, Travo A, Déléris G, Forfar I. FTIR spectroscopic metabolome analysis of lyophilized and fresh Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells. Analytical Methods. 2014;6(6):1855–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Colabella C, Corte L, Roscini L, Shapaval V, Kohler A, Tafintseva V, et al. Merging FT-IR and NGS for simultaneous phenotypic and genotypic identification of pathogenic Candida species. PloS one. 2017;12(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shapaval V, Walczak B, Gognies S, Møretrø T, Suso H, Åsli AW, et al. FTIR spectroscopic characterization of differently cultivated food related yeasts. Analyst. 2013;138(14):4129–38. 10.1039/c3an00304c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kohler A, Böcker U, Shapaval V, Forsmark A, Andersson M, Warringer J, et al. High-throughput biochemical fingerprinting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2015;10(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wagner H, Liu Z, Langner U, Stehfest K, Wilhelm C. The use of FTIR spectroscopy to assess quantitative changes in the biochemical composition of microalgae. Journal of biophotonics. 2010;3(8‐9):557–66. 10.1002/jbio.201000019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jebsen C, Norici A, Wagner H, Palmucci M, Giordano M, Wilhelm C. FTIR spectra of algal species can be used as physiological fingerprints to assess their actual growth potential. Physiologia plantarum. 2012;146(4):427–38. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01636.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mayers JJ, Flynn KJ, Shields RJ. Rapid determination of bulk microalgal biochemical composition by Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy. Bioresource technology. 2013;148:215–20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kosa G, Shapaval V, Kohler A, Zimmermann B. FTIR spectroscopy as a unified method for simultaneous analysis of intra-and extracellular metabolites in high-throughput screening of microbial bioprocesses. Microbial cell factories. 2017;16(1):195 10.1186/s12934-017-0817-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Veale EL, Irudayaraj J, Demirci A. An on‐line approach to monitor ethanol fermentation using FTIR spectroscopy. Biotechnology progress. 2007;23(2):494–500. 10.1021/bp060306v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ami D, Posteri R, Mereghetti P, Porro D, Doglia SM, Branduardi P. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a method to study lipid accumulation in oleaginous yeasts. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2014;7(1):12 10.1186/1754-6834-7-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu J, Mukherjee J, Hawkes JJ, Wilkinson SJ. Optimization of lipid production for algal biodiesel in nitrogen stressed cells of Dunaliella salina using FTIR analysis. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2013;88(10):1807–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Enshaeieh M, Abdoli A, Nahvi I, Madani M. Bioconversion of different carbon sources in to microbial oil and biodiesel using oleaginous yeasts. Journal of biology and today’s world. 2012;1(2):82–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brar K, Sarma A, Aslam M, Polikarpov I, Chadha B. Potential of oleaginous yeast Trichosporon sp., for conversion of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate into biodiesel. Bioresource technology. 2017;242:161–8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yehia R, Ali E, Al-Zahrani A. Feasibility of oleaginous fungi isolated from soil samples of Saudi Arabia for mycodiesel production. Applied biochemistry and microbiology. 2017;53(1):94–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shapaval V, Brandenburg J, Blomqvist J, Tafintseva V, Passoth V, Sandgren M, et al. Biochemical profiling, prediction of total lipid content and fatty acid profile in oleaginous yeasts by FTIR spectroscopy. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2019;12(1):140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cardoso A, Lins CIM, dos Santos ER, Silva MCF, Campos-Takaki GM. Microbial enhance of chitosan production by Rhizopus arrhizus using agroindustrial substrates. Molecules. 2012;17(5):4904–14. 10.3390/molecules17054904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Di Mario F, Rapana P, Tomati U, Galli E. Chitin and chitosan from Basidiomycetes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2008;43(1):8–12. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Teng WL, Khor E, Tan TK, Lim LY, Tan SCJCr. Concurrent production of chitin from shrimp shells and fungi. 2001;332(3):305–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wu T, Zivanovic S, Draughon FA, Conway WS, Sams CE. Physicochemical properties and bioactivity of fungal chitin and chitosan. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2005;53(10):3888–94. 10.1021/jf048202s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Khoshmanesh A, Cook PL, Wood BR. Quantitative determination of polyphosphate in sediments using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and partial least squares regression. Analyst. 2012;137(16):3704–9. 10.1039/c2an35289c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ojeda JJ, Dittrich M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for molecular analysis of microbial cells. Microbial Systems Biology: Springer; 2012. p. 187–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Forfang K, Zimmermann B, Kosa G, Kohler A, Shapaval V. FTIR spectroscopy for evaluation and monitoring of lipid extraction efficiency for oleaginous fungi. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0170611 10.1371/journal.pone.0170611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shapaval V, Afseth NK, Vogt G, Kohler A. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the prediction of fatty acid profiles in Mucor fungi grown in media with different carbon sources. Microbial cell factories. 2014;13(1):86 10.1186/1475-2859-13-86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kosa G, Vuoristo KS, Horn SJ, Zimmermann B, Afseth NK, Kohler A, et al. Assessment of the scalability of a microtiter plate system for screening of oleaginous microorganisms. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2018;102(11):4915–25. 10.1007/s00253-018-8920-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Xiong Y, Shapaval V, Kohler A, From PJ. A Laboratory-Built Fully Automated Ultrasonication Robot for Filamentous Fungi Homogenization. SLAS TECHNOLOGY: Translating Life Sciences Innovation. 2019:2472630319861361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li J, Shapaval V, Kohler A, Talintyre R, Schmitt J, Stone R, et al. A modular liquid sample handling robot for high-throughput Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Advances in reconfigurable mechanisms and robots II: Springer; 2016. p. 769–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Xiong Y, Shapaval V, Kohler A, Li J, From PJ. A Fully Automated Robot for the Preparation of Fungal Samples for FTIR Spectroscopy Using Deep Learning. IEEE Access. 2019;7:132763–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Walther G, Wagner L, Kurzai O. Updates on the taxonomy of Mucorales with an emphasis on clinically important taxa. Journal of Fungi. 2019;5(4):106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kavadia A, Komaitis M, Chevalot I, Blanchard F, Marc I, Aggelis G. Lipid and γ-linolenic acid accumulation in strains of Zygomycetes growing on glucose. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 2001;78(4):341–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kosa G, Kohler A, Tafintseva V, Zimmermann B, Forfang K, Afseth NK, et al. Microtiter plate cultivation of oleaginous fungi and monitoring of lipogenesis by high-throughput FTIR spectroscopy. Microbial cell factories. 2017;16(1):101 10.1186/s12934-017-0716-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zeng Y, Ji X-J, Chang S-M, Nie Z-K, Huang H. Improving arachidonic acid accumulation in Mortierella alpina through B-group vitamin addition. Bioprocess biosystems engineering. 2012;35(5):683–8. 10.1007/s00449-011-0648-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Demšar J, Curk T, Erjavec A, Gorup Č, Hočevar T, Milutinovič M, et al. Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2013;14(1):2349–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Toplak M, Birarda G, Read S, Sandt C, Rosendahl S, Vaccari L, et al. Infrared orange: connecting hyperspectral data with machine learning. Synchrotron Radiation News. 2017;30(4):40–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zimmermann B, Kohler A. Optimizing Savitzky-Golay parameters for improving spectral resolution and quantification in infrared spectroscopy. Applied spectroscopy. 2013;67(8):892–902. 10.1366/12-06723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Afseth NK, Kohler A. Extended multiplicative signal correction in vibrational spectroscopy, a tutorial. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2012;117:92–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kohler A, Kirschner C, Oust A, Martens H. Extended multiplicative signal correction as a tool for separation and characterization of physical and chemical information in Fourier transform infrared microscopy images of cryo-sections of beef loin. Applied spectroscopy. 2005;59(6):707–16. 10.1366/0003702054280649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Harrington PdB, Vieira NE, Espinoza J, Nien JK, Romero R, Yergey AL. Analysis of variance–principal component analysis: A soft tool for proteomic discovery. Analytica chimica acta. 2005;544(1–2):118–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Smilde AK, Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HC, Lamers R-JA, Van Der Greef J, Timmerman ME. ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(13):3043–8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cárdenas G, Cabrera G, Taboada E, Miranda SP. Chitin characterization by SEM, FTIR, XRD, and 13C cross polarization/mass angle spinning NMR. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2004;93(4):1876–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Guillen MD, Cabo N. Relationships between the composition of edible oils and lard and the ratio of the absorbance of specific bands of their Fourier transform infrared spectra. Role of some bands of the fingerprint region. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1998;46(5):1788–93. 10.1021/jf9705274 WOS:000073757800014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Byler DM, Susi H. Examination of the secondary structure of proteins by deconvolved FTIR spectra. Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules. 1986;25(3):469–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Barth A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta -Bioenergetics. 2007;1767(9):1073–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Krimm S, Bandekar J. Vibrational spectroscopy and conformation of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins Advances in protein chemistry. 38: Elsevier; 1986. p. 181–364. 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60528-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Shurvell H. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 1 John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Signori L, Ami D, Posteri R, Giuzzi A, Mereghetti P, Porro D, et al. Assessing an effective feeding strategy to optimize crude glycerol utilization as sustainable carbon source for lipid accumulation in oleaginous yeasts. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:75 10.1186/s12934-016-0467-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rothschild LJ, Mancinelli RL. Life in extreme environments. Nature. 2001;409(6823):1092 10.1038/35059215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Seufferheld MJ, Alvarez HM, Farias ME. Role of polyphosphates in microbial adaptation to extreme environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(19):5867–74. 10.1128/AEM.00501-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bignell E. The molecular basis of pH sensing, signaling, and homeostasis in fungi Advances in applied microbiology. 79: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1–18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394318-7.00001-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Safaei Z, Karimi K, Zamani A. Impact of phosphate, potassium, yeast extract, and trace metals on chitosan and metabolite production by Mucor indicus. International journal of molecular sciences. 2016;17(9):1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kumar MNR. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive functional polymers. 2000;46(1):1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.White SA, Farina PR, Fulton I. Production and isolation of chitosan from Mucor rouxii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979;38(2):323–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kim WJ, Lee WG, Theodore K, Chang HN. Optimization of culture conditions and continuous production of chitosan by the fungi, Absidia coerulea. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2001;6(1):6–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hu K-J, Hu J-L, Ho K-P, Yeung K-W. Screening of fungi for chitosan producers, and copper adsorption capacity of fungal chitosan and chitosanaceous materials. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2004;58(1):45–52. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Marie-Joelle Virolle

16 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-06637

Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi

PLOS ONE

Dear Simona Dzurendova,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration by unfortunately a single reviewer that is a biologist and not a FTIR expert, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the various points raised by the unique reviewer. I am actively trying to find FTIR experts to review the revised version of your manuscript.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 31 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Marie-Joelle Virolle, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of the article entitled "Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced

co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi" have evaluated the effect of N and P sources in the production and co-production of valuable metabolites. The article cover a high throughput study where different oleaginous microorganisms are simultaneously analysed. This manuscript represents an important milestone in the utility of FTIR spectroscopy for characterising metabolic capabilities of microbes, which may have important implications in biotechnology.

I have some comments I would like the authors to consider in order to improve the current manuscript.

- I understand the concept of bioproduction and how it can be advantageous in some cases for bioproduction, in order to increase economic viability of the processes. However, there are also important limitations that must be discussed, such as the fact that co-production would be linked most likely to as many downstream processes as products, which also increase the cost of of production and which may even cause that two compounds are difficult or impossible to separate.

-Along th same lines, I understand that the production of polyphosphate can be independent of the production of carbon based products such as lipids. However, lipids and chitins, would compete for the same kind of building blocks.

-For non-experts in the technique, it would be good to expand the differences between FTIR and Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FTIR. and why both are using for different purposes.

-Sentence on 321 must be rephrased.

-From the extracellular media, the authors measured glucose and phosphate and mention that other metabolites can be measured, such organic acid. What do the author observed in these cases? did they observe any other peak that could potentially correspond to the production of another valuable metabolite not considered in the study?

-The authors mention organic phosphate in YE as the reason why the addition of phosphate in that case does not affect much, which I agree. It would be good to give some numbers to this speculation, what is the usual content of phosphates in YE and how is that in relation with th Pi added.

-Several strains are used in this study. I miss an explanation of why those strains were selected and what is their known biotechnological potential.

-Can the technique provide absolute quantifications? the text is written in a very qualitative manner, just saying which strain is best on what but some kind of quantification, even if that is relative would help. Can yields and titers be quantified? if so, it would improve the manuscript a lot including some of these numbers to understand how do they correlate with previously published reports and, ultimately, the biotechnological potential. this would also allow to discuss more in detail the potential of co-production, is co-production still allowing significant levels of production when compared with the best single producers? Numbers would be especially helpful during the discussion.

-548-570. here the effect between N and P are compared. I find the wording a bit too strong, as it is difficult to truly compare what is more important, as the N experiment only compare organic vs inorganic N while the P experiment compare different concentrations of the same type of P. Different N concentrations should be measured in order to write statements like that. This can be easily solved by changing the wording.

-621. here it it discussed that phosphorus is a world limited compound and therefore it may be better to use YE. However, it must be taken into account that, eventually, you need phosphorus to make the YE, so the final balance of used P would be the same.

-In 639 the authors mention the pathway of ATP citrate lyase, which is found in most oleaginous organisms. Do all the organisms selected in this study have this activity encoded in their genome?

-Fig 2. The Y axes does not have any indication of units.

-Fig 5. Arrows should indicate what is the cell wall in each case and what are the lipid bodies.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0234870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234870.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 May 2020

Dear Dr. Virolle,

Thank you very much for providing us the reviewer’s reports and giving us the opportunity to revise the manuscript. We have read the reviewers’ report carefully and modified the manuscript accordingly. Bellow we refer to all the changes done in the manuscript and answer all questions and comments of the reviewer.

We would like to change the data availability statement. We provided all data with the revised manuscript- as an additional supplementary file. Therefore, we would like to state: ‘All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.’

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1 comment: The authors of the article entitled "Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi" have evaluated the effect of N and P sources in the production and co-production of valuable metabolites. The article covers a high throughput study where different oleaginous microorganisms are simultaneously analyzed. This manuscript represents an important milestone in the utility of FTIR spectroscopy for characterizing metabolic capabilities of microbes, which may have important implications in biotechnology.

I have some comments I would like the authors to consider in order to improve the current manuscript.

- I understand the concept of bioproduction and how it can be advantageous in some cases for bioproduction, in order to increase economic viability of the processes. However, there are also important limitations that must be discussed, such as the fact that co-production would be linked most likely to as many downstream processes as products, which also increases the cost of production and which may even cause that two compounds are difficult or impossible to separate.

Authors’ answer: We agree with the reviewer, that this point was not sufficiently addressed in the manuscript. According to the reviewer suggestion, we added the requested information to the end of the discussion section (see lines 751-763) in order to clarify the advantages and challenges of the co-production concept. Our reasoning in this new section is as follows.

As the reviewer is highlighting, a higher number of downstream processes will increase the cost of bioproduction and a co-production concept of bioproduction in some cases may lead to the use of different downstream processes. In the case of oleaginous fungal biomass, co-produced lipids and chitin/chitosan are located in different cell compartments (lipids in lipid droplets, chitin/chitosan in cell wall) and therefore they can be relatively easily separated by using e.g. solvent-based or supercritical fluid extraction. The separation of polyphosphate could be challenging since its located both intracellularly and in the cell wall.

Further, we mention that a co-production concept is particularly beneficial for producing microbial biomass to be consumed as a whole, without separation and purification of individual components. For example, fungal biomass enriched in lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates could be particularly beneficial for fish feed applications.

In addition, when developing sustainable biorefineries, it is crucial to develop flexible bioprocesses, which could be easily switched depending on the targeted products. In this case identifying microbial factories which are able performing co-production is important.

Reviewer #1 comment: Along the same lines, I understand that the production of polyphosphate can be independent of the production of carbon-based products such as lipids. However, lipids and chitins, would compete for the same kind of building blocks.

Authors’ answer: It is true that both lipids and chitin/chitosan are carbon-based products. Therefore, achieving a high yield of lipids will be at the expense of the yield of chitin/chitosan and vice versa. However, it is important to note that chitin/chitosan are the principle components of the fungal cell wall. Thus, even if we aim at the highest possible lipid yield, the cell wall, which constitutes an essential part of the fungal cells, will always constitute a rest product after lipid extraction. We agree with the reviewer that the competition of chitin/chitosan production and lipid production with respect to carbon production was not sufficiently highlighted in the manuscript. We have therefore added a statement in lines 755-759. Moreover, as we already described in the introduction (lines 55-58), co-production of low value lipids for biofuels application and high value products such as chitin/chitosan is the only economically sustainable approach for fungal biofuels biorefineries.

Reviewer #1 comment: For non-experts in the technique, it would be good to expand the differences between FTIR and Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FTIR. and why both are using for different purposes.

Authors’ answer: We expanded the section 2.2 ‘Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy reveals co-production in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi’ related to FTIR-HTS and FTIR-ATR in lines 371-381 by adding the following paragraph. “In infrared spectroscopy, the loss of infrared radiation due to chemical absorption is quantified. In the FTIR-HTS transmission mode, the loss of radiation due to absorption is quantified by transmitting infrared radiation through a sample and quantifying the loss of the radiation by comparing the transmitted radiation with the radiation that impinges on the sample. By covering the complete spectra range of the mid-infrared, biochemical fingerprint of all major chemical building blocks is obtained. The FTIR-HTS system employs a high-throughput setup with microplates and automated measurements allowing the automated analysis of around 180 samples in one measurement run. Relatively large variance in sample thickness results in the difference in optical path length, which can be corrected by standard pre-processing tools developed by us (Kohler et al, 2005; Zimmermann et al, 2013). In FTIR-ATR analysis, the infrared radiation undergoes reflection in an ATR crystal an produces an evanescent field in the sample which is located on its surface. The evanescent field is attenuated by the sample die to chemical absorption and the absorption can be quantified by relating the attenuated radiation with the radiation that is obtained in an ATR setup without a sample at the surface of the crystal. The ATR setup is characterized by a high reproducibility caused by a stable penetration depth of the IR beam into the sample, when the sample at the top of the crystal is in tight contact with the surface of the crystal. This is true for liquid and viscous samples such as the culture supernatant in our measurements.”

Reviewer #1 comment: Sentence on 321 (324 in revised manuscript) must be rephrased.

Authors’ answer: The sentence was split and rephrased according to the reviewer suggestion (see line 324-332): "Figure 1A shows the effect of yeast extract, a complex organic multi-component substrate containing both nitrogen and phosphorus, on the cultivation of Mucoromycota fungi under different Pi levels. The results indicate that the addition of inorganic phosphorus could be neglected, since it does not have any significant effect on the biomass production.”

Reviewer #1 comment: From the extracellular media, the authors measured glucose and phosphate and mention that other metabolites can be measured, such organic acid. What do the author observed in these cases? did they observe any other peak that could potentially correspond to the production of another valuable metabolite not considered in the study?

Authors’ answer:

Organic acids can be precisely detected by FTIR spectroscopy, as we have shown in our previous study (Kosa et al, 2017). In some cases, we observed a peak associated with a C=O stretch at 1725 cm-1, corresponding to the organic acids on the FTIR-HTS spectra of culture supernatants. However, we decided not to include data of culture supernatants in this manuscript as it would go beyond the scope of the manuscript. We did not observe any other peak in the FTIR-ATR spectra which could correspond to an additional high-value metabolite in the extracellular media.

Reviewer #1 comment: The authors mention organic phosphate in YE as the reason why the addition of phosphate in that case does not affect much, which I agree. It would be good to give some numbers to this speculation, what is the usual content of phosphates in YE and how is that in relation with the Pi added.

Authors’ answer: We added information about the P-content in YE to the manuscript, see lines 332 - 334: "Yeast extract contains approximately 2.5% of total phosphorus. This amount corresponds to approx. 15% in terms of total P contained in added phosphates salts in the lowest examined Pi condition- Pi0.25."

Reviewer #1 comment: Several strains are used in this study. I miss an explanation of why those strains were selected and what is their known biotechnological potential.

Authors’ answer: The selection and the biotechnological potential of selected strains is shortly described in lines 145 - 150: "The selection of fungal strains was based on the results of our recent study, where 100 oleaginous filamentous fungi were screened for their ability to accumulate high amount of lipids. While some Mucoromycota species have been previously identified as medically important, in general they have been utilised at industrial scale as cell factories for example for chitosan, lipids or lactic acid production. " In addition, in the introduction we have provided overview of studies and several examples of Mucoromycota products, co-production strategies and possible substrates which they were able to utilize (see lines 41-44, 58-62). We hope this explanation is sufficient.

Reviewer #1 comment: Can the technique provide absolute quantifications? the text is written in a very qualitative manner, just saying which strain is best on what but some kind of quantification, even if that is relative would help. Can yields and titers be quantified? if so, it would improve the manuscript a lot including some of these numbers to understand how do they correlate with previously published reports and, ultimately, the biotechnological potential. this would also allow to discuss more in detail the potential of co-production, is co-production still allowing significant levels of production when compared with the best single producers? Numbers would be especially helpful during the discussion.

Authors’ answer: We clarified this aspect in following paragraph, which was added in lines 403-414: “Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can provide both qualitative and quantitative measures. Quantitative analysis by FTIR requires regression onto reference data. For regression analysis often methods based on latent variables such as partial least square regression are used. As reference data for respective metabolites, e.g. chromatography analyses can be used. Qualitative measures are achieved by spectral assignments (see Figure 3 and Table 3) and by applying unsupervised multivariate data analysis tools (for example principal component analysis or ANOVA-PCA). Although FTIR spectroscopy cannot provide absolute quantifications without establishing calibration models based on reference quantitative data, a semi-quantitative analysis of ratios of chemical constituents (see Figure 13) can be obtained. Nevertheless, the biggest advantage of the FTIR approach is that it allows high-throughput screening of samples and detection of a vast range of different metabolites simultaneously within a single analytical run. Thus, it provides high precision qualitative information allowing to pre-select strains and growth conditions. “

The main aim of the study was to perform a high-throughput screening for testing many different growth conditions and fungal strains (324 cultivations were performed in total) for: 1) identifying the most promising strains and growth conditions for the co-production, and for 2) understanding the influence of N and P on the co-production of lipids, chitin/chitosan and polyphosphates. For the high-throughput screening we used microcultivation in microtiter plates that provides a relatively small amount of biomass which was not sufficient for the reference analyses of several metabolites. Therefore, we utilized FTIR spectroscopy as rapid qualitative technique providing multi-analyte information on a very high number of samples (approx. 2000 biomass samples and media samples were measured in total).

Reviewer #1 comment: Line 548-570 (lines 605-611 in the revised manuscript), here the effect between N and P are compared. I find the wording a bit too strong, as it is difficult to truly compare what is more important, as the N experiment only compare organic vs inorganic N while the P experiment compare different concentrations of the same type of P. Different N concentrations should be measured in order to write statements like that. This can be easily solved by changing the wording.

Authors’ answer: We modified the wording according to the reviewer suggestion: "ANOVA model for the spectral region related to chitin/chitosan (3457 – 3417 cm-1, 3293 – 3251 cm-1, 3133 – 3081 cm-1, 1639 – 1623 cm-1, 1392 – 1346 cm-1, 962 – 941 cm-1) showed that nature of N-source may have a strong effect for Absidia glauca and Mortierella hyalina, while variation in the concentration of Pi and N-Pi interaction did not show any significant influence for these fungi (Fig. 12). Generally, it could be concluded that the nature of N-source is possibly important for chitin/chitosan content for most of the studied fungi, while the influence from N-Pi interaction seemed to be least important. " -line 605-611.

Reviewer #1 comment: Line 621 (line 661 in the revised manuscript), here it is discussed that phosphorus is a world limited compound and therefore it may be better to use YE. However, it must be taken into account that, eventually, you need phosphorus to make the YE, so the final balance of used P would be the same.

Authors’ answer: It is true that when using yeast extract, the final P balance would be the same. However, our statements concerned the general use of complex N-source substrates, which could be enriched with organic phosphorus. By utilizing such substrates, we could recover phosphorus in the form of cellular polyphosphates, which would be highly beneficial taking in account the global phosphorus limitations. In some cases, we would need to enrich substrates with additional nitrogen and phosphorus and in this case yeast extract is a good option since it contains both components and also other beneficial components in comparison to the simple inorganic N source such as ammonium sulphate. Based on our results, we conclude that if such complex organic materials as YE are used as substrates, there is no need to add inorganic phosphorus. We agree with the reviewer that this point was not clear in the manuscript and modified the sentence in lines 661-662 in order to make the point clearer: ’This indicates that usage of complex N-source substrates, containing nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients for the enrichment of rest materials could be beneficial and sustainable. Such cultivation would provide relatively stable biomass yields without addition of inorganic phosphorus, which is a world limited chemical component.’

Reviewer #1 comment: In 639 (line 685 the revised manuscript) the authors mention the pathway of ATP citrate lyase, which is found in most oleaginous organisms. Do all the organisms selected in this study have this activity encoded in their genome?

Authors’ answer: All fungal strains used in the study are oleaginous and able to accumulate more than 20% of lipids, while we did not check the ATP citrate lyase activity. The selection of fungal strains is explained in the paragraph ‘Oleaginous filamentous fungi’ (see lines 145 – 151). Strains used in the study were selected based on our previous screening of hundred oleaginous fungi for the high- and low value lipid production.

Reviewer #1 comment: Fig 2. The Y axes does not have any indication of units.

Authors’ answer: Y axes captions were added in Fig 2.

Reviewer #1 comment: Fig 5. Arrows should indicate what is the cell wall in each case and what are the lipid bodies.

Authors’ answer: Arrows indicating cell wall and lipid bodies were added in Fig 5 (and in the figure caption).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Marie-Joelle Virolle

4 Jun 2020

Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi

PONE-D-20-06637R1

Dear Dr. Simona Dzurendova,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Marie-Joelle Virolle, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors addressed all my comments and significantly improved the manuscipt. I suggest the acceptance of the work.

Reviewer #2: I have read carefully the revised manuscript PONE-D-20-06637_R1 entitled “Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi ”. The authors of this work present here a paper they wrote about the relative quantification of various metabolites in diverse media using FTIR HTS or ATR approach.

All the answers given to the previous reviewers are really satisfactory. So, my principal remark will concern the main substance of this article that clearly bring novelty and great interest to the community regarding the current state of the art. I would recommend this manuscript for publication in the PLOS journal in its actual revised form.

Sincerely yours.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Marie-Joelle Virolle

10 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-06637R1

Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi

Dear Dr. Dzurendova:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Marie-Joelle Virolle

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Absidia glauca (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Absidia glauca (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Amylomyces rouxii (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Amylomyces rouxii (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Cunninghamella blakesleeana (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S6 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Cunninghamella blakesleeana (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S7 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Lichtheimia corymbifera (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S8 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Lichtheimia corymbifera (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S9 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella alpina (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S10 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella alpina (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S11 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mucor circinelloides (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S12 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mucor circinelloides (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S13 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella hyalina (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S14 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Mortierella hyalina (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S15 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Rhizopus stolonifer (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S16 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Rhizopus stolonifer (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S17 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Umbelopsis vinacea (EMSC corrected); ammonium sulphate nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S18 Fig. FTIR-HTS spectra of Umbelopsis vinacea (EMSC corrected); yeast extract nitrogen source, different Pi-levels.

    (DOCX)

    S19 Fig. FTIR-ATR spectra of glucose, ammonium sulphate (AS), phosphate salts, yeast extract (YE) and growth media AS-Pi4 before the cultivation.

    (DOCX)

    S20 Fig

    Titration of 100 ml not autoclaved YE-Pi0.25 (blue) and AS-Pi0.25 (red) with 1M HCl confirmed the buffering properties of yeast extract.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. FTIR raw spectral data: HTS spectra of biomass, ATR spectra of culture supernatant, ATR spectra of reference materials, HTS spectra of culture supernatant MCI_YE_Pi1; MCI_AS_Pi1.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES