Abstract
Excessive proliferation and myofibroblasts transformation of cardiac fibroblasts play a critical role in the process of cardiac fibrosis. Atorvastatin (ATV), a 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, is commonly used to treat hypercholesterolemia. It has previously been shown that ATV has potential anti-fibrotic effects. However, the underlying mechanisms of ATV against cardiac fibrosis remain to be fully elucidated, and to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports focusing on the effects of ATV on transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-induced human ventricular fibroblasts (hVFs) activation. In the present study, hVFs were stimulated with TGF-β1 with or without pretreatment with ATV. Subsequently, hVF proliferation, cytotoxicity, myofibroblast differentiation and pro-fibrotic gene expression were assessed. Canonical and non-canonical signaling downstream of TGF-β1, such as Smad3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, were investigated by evaluating the phosphorylation levels of Smad3, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, p38 MAPK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. The results indicated that ATV significantly prevented TGF-β1-induced cell proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation and production of extracellular matrix proteins, such as matrix metalloproteinase-2, collagen I and collagen III, in hVFs. Furthermore, ATV effectively inhibited TGF-β1-induced activation of Smad3 and MAPK signaling in hVFs. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that ATV prevented TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in hVFs, at least in part by inhibiting the Smad3 and MAPK signaling pathways. Therefore, these results imply that ATV may be a promising agent to treat myocardial fibrosis.
Keywords: cardiac fibrosis, human ventricular fibroblasts, transforming growth factor-β1, atorvastatin, extracellular matrix, signaling pathways
Introduction
Myocardial fibrosis is a common pathological feature of multiple end-stage cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, advanced coronary heart disease and cardio-myopathy (1). Fibrosis is defined by overproliferation and activation of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), and accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components secreted by activated fibroblasts (2,3). Therefore, prevention of CF proliferation and abrogation of CF trans-differentiation into myofibroblasts may become an effective strategy for treating cardiac fibrosis.
Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is a major pro-fibrotic factor (2,4). It can stimulate the proliferation of CFs and the differentiation of CFs into myofibroblasts, which are characterized by the upregulation of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and the secretion of ECM proteins, such as collagen I and collagen III (5,6). TGF-β1 ligand initiates a signaling cascade through cell-surface receptors and intracellular Smad signal proteins, such as the canonical signal transducer-Smad2/3 protein, whose activation is associated with the transcription of numerous pro-fibrotic genes (7,8). Furthermore, TGF-β1 can induce other non-canonical signaling cascades independently of Smads, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 MAPK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (9). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that MAPK signaling plays a critical role in ECM synthesis and in the proliferation of CFs (10,11). Thus, pharmacological interventions in these signaling pathways could be considered as a promising therapeutic strategy against cardiac fibrosis.
Statins, which are inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, have been extensively applied to treat patients with hypercholesterolemia in the past decade due to their lipid-reducing effects (12). Furthermore, statins have also been reported to possess pleiotropic cardiovascular effects, including reduced oxidative stress and inflammation, decreased platelet adhesion, improved endothelial function and enhanced atherosclerotic plaque stability (13-15). In addition, previous studies have shown that atorvastatin (ATV), a member of the statin family, exerts potential anti-myocardial fibrotic properties (16-20). Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the molecular mechanism involved in the effect of ATV on cardiac fibrosis remains to be clarified, and limited information is available concerning the possible impact of ATV on TGF-β1-induced human ventricular fibroblast (hVF) proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of ATV on TGF-β1-stimulated fibrogenesis and its underlying molecular mechanism in hVFs. The findings indicated that ATV prevents TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in hVFs, at least in part, by inhibiting the Smad3 and MAPK signaling pathways.
Materials and methods
Cells, chemicals and reagents
Adult hVFs (cat. no. 6310) and complete medium for their culture (fibroblast medium-2; FM-2; cat. no. 2331) were obtained from ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc. Antibodies against α-SMA, matrix metal-loproteinase-2 (MMP-2), collagen I and collagen III were purchased from ProteinTech Group, Inc. Antibodies against phosphorylated (p)-Smad3, total (t)-Smad3, p-ERK1/2, t-ERK1/2, p-JNK, t-JNK, p-p38 and t-p38 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Anti-GAPDH antibody and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) were purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology. ATV was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA). Recombinant human TGF-β1 cytokine was purchased from PeproTech, Inc.
Cell culture
hVFs were maintained in FM-2 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (cat. no. 0025; ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc.) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. The cells were passaged ≤8 times and were cultured for 16 h in serum-free medium before treatment. In the present study, an in vitro cardiac fibrosis model was established by treatment of hVFs with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, according to the previous literature (3,21).
Cell viability assays
The survival rate of the cells was deter-mined by CCK-8 assay according to the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, fibroblasts (1×104 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates until ~90% confluence. Subsequently, cells were subjected to serum starvation for 16 h, followed by treatment with ATV (0, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 µM) for 24 h at 37°C. Following treatment, the cells were washed with PBS, and then 10 µl CCK-8 was added to each well and incubated for an additional 4 h at 37°C. Next, the absorbance of each well at 450 nm was examined using an automatic microplate reader (TECAN M200; Tecan Group, Ltd.). The results were expressed as percentages of the control group (cells were treated with an equal amount of DMSO).
Cell proliferation assay
hVFs were seeded into 96-well plates at 2×103 cells/well and cultured overnight. Cells were deprived of serum for 16 h before being pretreated with ATV (2, 5 and 10 µM) or DMSO for 3 h, followed by stimulation with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml) for 24 h in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Subsequently, the medium was removed from each well, and CCK-8 solution (10 µl/well) was added into the wells, followed by incubation for an additional 4 h at 37°C. Finally, the optical density of each well was detected at an absorbance wavelength of 450 nm using the aforementioned microplate reader.
Western blotting
hVFs (5×105 cells/well) were plated into 6-well plates, cultured to ~80% confluence and starved of serum for 16 h. Then, the cells were pretreated for 3 h with ATV (10 µM) or DMSO before treatment with 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 24 h at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) at 4°C. Lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay (cat. no. 23227; Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cell lysates (30 µg) were separated by 8-10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Merck KGaA). The membranes were blocked with blocking buffer (5% nonfat dry milk in TBS plus 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, including antibodies against α-SMA (1:1,000; cat. no. 14395-1-AP), MMP-2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 10373-2-AP), collagen I (1:2,000; cat. no. 14695-1-AP), collagen III (1:1,000; cat. no. 22734-1-AP), p-Smad3 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9520), t-Smad3 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9523), p-ERK1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9101), t-ERK1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9102), p-JNK (1:1,000; cat. no. 4671), t-JNK (1:1,000; cat. no. 9252), p-p38 (1:1,000; cat. no. 4511), t-p38 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9212) and GAPDH (1:5,000; cat. no. AG019). Following washing three times with washing buffer (TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies [HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:2,000, cat. no. D110058; HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, 1:2,000, cat. no. D110087; all from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.] for 1 h at 25°C. The protein signals were detected using Immobilon ECL HRP Substrate (Merck KGaA), and images were acquired using Chemidoc XRS (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Image Pro-Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.) was used to quantify the density of the bands.
Immunofluorescence staining
In order to detect the effect of ATV on the trans-differentiation of hVFs into activated myofibroblasts, cells were stained with the fibroblast activation marker α-SMA. The fibroblasts (1x104 cells/well) were cultured on coverslips in the plate and were subjected to different treatments as follows: i) Control group (DMSO treatment); ii) TGF-β1 group; iii) ATV group; and iv) TGF-β1 combined with ATV group. Following treatment, cells were washed three times with cold PBS, treated with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X 100 for 15 min at room temperature. Following blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin [cat. no. A602449; Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.] in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, the slides were stained with the aforementioned primary antibody against α-SMA (1:100) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:400; cat. no. A11008; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to probe the primary antibody, and the nuclei were stained with DAPI at room temperature for 5 min. Lastly, the cells were covered with antifade mounting medium (cat. no. MM1401; Shanghai Maokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), and images were captured using an Olympus fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation; magnification, x200).
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from cells using NucleoZOL reagent (cat. no. 740404.200; Macherey-Nagel GmbH) and was reverse transcribed into cDNA with PrimeScript™ RT Master mix (cat. no. RR036A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Firstly, ordinary PCR was performed using Rapid Taq Master mix (cat. no. P222; Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd), according to the manufacturer's protocol, to ensure that the PCR product of each primer pair was specific. The temper-ature conditions were 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 15 sec and 72°C for 15 sec, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Then, qPCR was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) using SYBR Green Supermix (cat. no. RR820A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The thermocy-cling conditions for qPCR were as follows: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min. GAPDH was used as a reference gene for normalization. The relative gene expressions were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCq method (22). The primer sequences are presented in Table I.
Table I.
Gene | Forward sequence (5′-3′) | Reverse sequence (5′-3′) |
---|---|---|
α-SMA C | TATGAGGGCTATGCCTTGCC | GCTCAGCAGTAGTAACGAAGGA |
MMP-2 | GATACCCCTTTGACGGTAAGGA | CCTTCTCCCAAGGTCCATAGC |
COL-I | GAGGGCCAAGACGAAGACATC C | AGATCACGTCATCGCACAAC |
COL-III | GCCAAATATGTGTCTGTGACTCA | GGGCGAGTAGGAGCAGTTG |
GAPDH | GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT | GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG |
α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; COL-I, type I collagen; COL-III, type III collagen.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed indepen-dently a minimum of three times. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of mean. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Statistical differences were assessed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
ATV suppresses TGF-β1-induced proliferation of hVFs
Firstly, to investigate the cytotoxic effect of ATV on hVFs, cells were incubated with ATV for 24 h at different concentrations (0, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 µM), and then cell viability was detected using a CCK-8 assay. As presented in Fig. 1A, ATV did not induce cytotoxicity at concentrations ≤10 µM. Subsequently, to assess the effect of ATV on the TGF-β1-stimulated proliferation of hVFs, cells were exposed to 5 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 24 h after pre-incubation with ATV (0, 2, 5 and 10 µM) for 3 h. The rate of proliferation was then detected using the CCK-8 assay and compared with that of the control group. The results demon-strated that TGF-β1 significantly increased the proliferation of hVFs. However, pre-incubation with ATV (10 µM) signifi-cantly attenuated the increase in cell proliferation induced by TGF-β1 (Fig. 1B). Therefore, 10 µM was selected as the concentration of ATV for the following experiments.
ATV treatment prevents the trans-differentiation of hVFs into myofibroblasts
Several studies have demonstrated that the differentiation of CFs into myofibroblasts plays a central role in the development of cardiac fibrosis (23,24). The marker of fibroblast activation is the overexpression of α-SMA (25). Therefore, the effect of ATV on TGF-β1-induced α-SMA expression in hVFs was assessed. Firstly, α-SMA expression was detected by immunofluorescence staining. As presented in Fig. 2A, in comparison with that of the control group, treatment with TGF-β1 alone for 24 h increased the expression level of α-SMA in hVFs. However, pre-incubation with ATV markedly inhibited the TGF-β1-induced α-SMA expression in hVFs. To confirm the immunostaining results, α-SMA expression levels were further detected using RT-qPCR and western blotting. Consistently, the significant upregulation of α-SMA in hVFs exposed to TGF-β1 was significantly attenuated by pre-incubation with ATV at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2B-D).
ATV inhibits TGF-β1-induced ECM production in hVFs
It has been reported that ECM deposition plays an important role in the pathogenesis of myocardial fibrosis (26). Thus, the effects of ATV on TGF-β1-stimulated ECM expression in hVFs were further investigated. Both RT-qPCR and immunoblot-ting assays revealed that TGF-β1 significantly increased the expression levels of MMP-2, collagen I and collagen III in hVFs. Whereas, pretreatment of hVFs with ATV significantly attenuated the TGF-β1-induced increases in the expression levels of these ECM components (Fig. 3A–C).
ATV inhibits TGF-β1-induced activation of the Smad3 and MAPK signaling pathways in hVFs
To investigate the signaling pathways that are involved in the ATV-suppressed fibrotic response in TGF-β1-treated hVFs, the effect of ATV on the activation of Smad3, ERK1/2, p38 and JNK signaling was detected. As presented in Fig. 4A-D, the western blot results indicated that the phosphorylation of Smad3, ERK1/2, JNK and p38 was significantly increased in TGF-β1-induced hVFs. However, the TGF-β1-induced activation of these signaling molecules was significantly suppressed by ATV. These data demonstrated that the ATV-decreased fibrotic response in hVFs treated by TGF-β1 was likely associated with suppression of Smad3 and MAPK signaling (Fig. 5).
Discussion
To date, several specific anti-fibrotic therapies have been evaluated for use, with unsatisfactory results (27). Therefore, identifying a novel and effective strategy for the treatment of cardiac fibrosis is urgently required. To the best of our knowledge, the present data indicated for the first time that ATV prevents TGF-β1-stimulated myofibroblast differentiation and ECM protein production in hVFs, and the underlying mechanism may be, at least in part, due to the suppression of Smad3 and MAPK signaling activation.
CFs account for ~2/3 of the total cell number in the adult human heart, and contribute to the maintenance of cardiac structure, function and ECM homeostasis in the normal state, and the regulation of structural integrity and scar formation following myocardial injury (28,29). Abnormal proliferation of CFs is the major cellular pathological basis of cardiac fibrosis. Increasing evidence suggests that TGF-β1, a key pro-fibrotic cytokine, can promote CF proliferation (30,31), which was confirmed in the present study. Furthermore, TGF-β1 has been demonstrated to be markedly and consistently activated in various cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial hyper-trophy and myocardial infarction (32,33). The findings of the present study indicated that ATV effectively decreased cell proliferation in TGF-β1-stimulated hVFs. The results revealed that ATV can exert protective effects against myocardial fibrosis through suppressing hVF proliferation.
The trans-differentiation of CFs into myofibroblasts has been shown to play a vital role in the progress of cardiac fibrosis (34). Myofibroblasts are defined by excessive α-SMA expression and ECM protein secretion (5,25). The present study demonstrated that TGF-β1 significantly promoted fibroblast differentiation and ECM protein expression, which is in accordance with the findings reported by previous studies (30,31,35). However, pre-incubation with ATV inhibited the TGF-β1-stimulated fibrotic response in hVFs. The results were in agreement with earlier studies, which reported that ATV prevents advanced glycation end products-, angiotensin II-, hypertension-, aldosterone- and doxorubicin-induced cardiac fibrosis (16-20).
TGF-β1 canonically activates downstream Smad pathways, and TGF-β1/Smad signaling plays a crucial role in the development of myocardial fibrosis (36-38). During fibrogenesis, Smad3, a major downstream mediator of TGF-β1, is phos-phorylated by activated TGF-β type I receptor kinase (39-41). p-Smad3 protein then interacts with Smad4 to form a complex and translocates to the cell nucleus, where it functions as a transcriptional factor and induces the transcriptional activation of numerous fibrotic genes, including α-SMA, MMP-2 and collagens (7,8). In addition to the Smad-mediated pathways, TGF-β1 can also act through non-canonical signaling pathways, such as the MAPK signaling pathway (9). Accumulating evidence has reported that ERK/JNK/p38 MAPK signaling is involved in regulating multiple cellular processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation and survival (42,43). In addition, MAPK signaling pathways have also been shown to play an essential role in the progression of cardiac fibrosis. For example, ERK1/2 has been reported to play an important signaling role in driving CF proliferation (44), and it is required for TGF-β1-induced pro-fibrotic phenotypes (3). Molkentin et al (11) reported that transgenic mice with fibroblast-specific activation of p38 MAPK developed interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in the heart. Thus, inhibiting these signaling pathways may imply a promising therapeutic strategy against cardiac fibrosis. The present study evaluated the importance of Smad3 and MAPK signaling in TGF-β1-induced cardiac fibrosis in hVFs. The results indicated that TGF-β1 significantly activated both Smad3 and MAPK signaling in hVFs. However, ATV pretreatment significantly decreased the TGF-β1-induced phosphorylation levels of Smad3, ERK1/2, JNK and p38 MAPK in hVFs. This suggested that ATV inhibited TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in hVFs at least in part through inhibition of the Smad3 and MAPK signaling pathways.
There are also some limitations in the present study. Firstly, the results were obtained only from a series of in vitro experiments, and were not validated in vivo. Secondly, the exact targets of ATV in cardiac fibrosis remain unclear. Further investigations need to be performed to resolve these limitations.
Taken together, the results of the present study report a protective role of ATV on TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in hVFs and the potential mechanism involved. The results demonstrated that ATV prevented TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in hVFs at least in part by inhibiting Smad3 and MAPK signaling activation. These novel findings suggest a potential therapeutic effect of ATV against fibrotic disease in clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported by The Natural Science Foundation of Southwest Medical University and The Foundation of The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (grant no. 2017-PT-43).
Availability of data and materials
All data used or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
YD, HX, JW, XW, TL, JF, SZ, QY and JL performed the experiments. ZF and GL conceived and designed the research. YD, HX, GL and ZF analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. QY and JL reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Rockey DC, Bell PD, Hill JA. Fibrosis-a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1504848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davis J, Molkentin JD. Myofibroblasts: Trust your heart and let fate decide. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;70:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schafer S, Viswanathan S, Widjaja AA, Lim WW, Moreno-Moral A, DeLaughter DM, Ng B, Patone G, Chow K, Khin E, et al. IL-11 is a crucial determinant of cardiovascular fibrosis. Nature. 2017;552:110–115. doi: 10.1038/nature24676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Akhurst RJ, Hata A. Targeting the TGFβ signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:790–811. doi: 10.1038/nrd3810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol. 2008;214:199–210. doi: 10.1002/path.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eghbali M, Tomek R, Woods C, Bhambi B. Cardiac fibro-blasts are predisposed to convert into myocyte phenotype: Specific effect of transforming growth factor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:795–799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.3.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00432-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schiller M, Javelaud D, Mauviel A. TGF-beta-induced SMAD signaling and gene regulation: Consequences for extracellular matrix remodeling and wound healing. J Dermatol Sci. 2004;35:83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2003.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Evangelia P, Peter TD. TGFβ signaling and cardiovascular diseases. Int J Bio Sci. 2012;8:195–213. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.8.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chung CC, Kao YH, Yao CJ, Lin YK, Chen YJ. A comparison of left and right atrial fibroblasts reveals different collagen production activity and stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling in rats. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2017;220:432–445. doi: 10.1111/apha.12835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Molkentin JD, Bugg D, Ghearing N, Dorn LE, Kim P, Sargent MA, Gunaje J, Otsu K, Davis J. Fibroblast-specific genetic manipulation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in vivo reveals its central regulatory role in fibrosis. Circulation. 2017;136:549–561. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McFarlane SI, Muniyappa R, Francisco R, Sowers JR. Clinical review 145: Pleiotropic effects of statins: Lipid reduction and beyond. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1451–1458. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang CY, Liu PY, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statin therapy: Molecular mechanisms and clinical results. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ludman A, Venugopal V, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Statins and cardioprotection-more than just lipid lowering? Pharmacol Ther. 2009;122:30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liao JK. Effects of statins on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibition beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:24F–33F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen M, Li H, Wang G, Shen X, Zhao S, Su W. Atorvastatin prevents advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-induced cardiac fibrosis via activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) Metabolism. 2016;65:441–453. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi SY, Park JS, Roh MS, Kim CR, Kim MH, Serebruany V. Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by atorvastatin in adiponectin knockout mice. Lipids. 2017;52:415–422. doi: 10.1007/s11745-017-4246-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fang T, Guo B, Xue L, Wang L. Atorvastatin prevents myocardial fibrosis in spontaneous hypertension via inter-leukin-6 (IL-6)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/endothelin-1 (ET-1) pathway. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:318–323. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Q, Cui W, Zhang HL, Hu HJ, Zhang YN, Liu DM, Liu J. Atorvastatin suppresses aldosterone-induced neonatal rat cardiac fibroblast proliferation by inhibiting ERK1/2 in the genomic pathway. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013;61:520–527. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31828c090e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gao G, Jiang S, Ge L, Zhang S, Zhai C, Chen W, Sui S. Atorvastatin improves doxorubicin-induced cardiac dysfunction by modulating Hsp70, Akt, and MAPK signaling pathways. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019;73:223–231. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xiao H, Ma X, Feng W, Fu Y, Lu Z, Xu M, Sheng Q, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. Metformin attenuates cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting the TGFbeta1-Smad3 signalling pathway. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87:504–513. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yi X, Li X, Zhou Y, Ren S, Wan W, Feng G, Jiang X. Hepatocyte growth factor regulates the TGF-β1-induced proliferation, differentiation and secretory function of cardiac fibroblasts. Int J Mol Med. 2014;34:381–390. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Nieuwenhoven FA, Turner NA. The role of cardiac fibro-blasts in the transition from inflammation to fibrosis following myocardial infarction. Vascul Pharmacol. 2013;58:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abdalla M, Goc A, Segar L, Somanath PR. Akt1 mediates α-smooth muscle actin expression and myofibroblast differentiation via myocardin and serum response factor. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:33483–33493. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.504290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lan TH, Huang XQ, Tan HM. Vascular fibrosis in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2013;22:401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Park S, Nguyen NB, Pezhouman A, Ardehali R. Cardiac fibrosis: Potential therapeutic targets. Transl Res. 2019;209:121–137. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jugdutt BI. Remodeling of the myocardium and potential targets in the collagen degradation and synthesis pathways. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2003;3:1–30. doi: 10.2174/1568006033337276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Souders CA, Bowers SL, Baudino TA. Cardiac fibroblast: The renaissance cell. Circ Res. 2009;105:1164–1176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li P, Wang D, Lucas J, Oparil S, Xing D, Cao X, Novak L, Renfrow MB, Chen YF. Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits transforming growth factor beta-induced Smad signaling and myofibroblast transformation in mouse cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res. 2008;102:185–192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.157677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rizvi F, Siddiqui R, DeFranco A, Homar P, Emelyanova L, Holmuhamedov E, Ross G, Tajik AJ, Jahangir A. Simvastatin reduces TGF-β1-induced SMAD2/3-dependent human ventricular fibroblasts differentiation: Role of protein phosphatase activation. Int J Cardiol. 2018;270:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bujak M, Frangogiannis NG. The role of TGF-beta signaling in myocardial infarction and cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;74:184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li RK, Li G, Mickle DA, Weisel RD, Merante F, Luss H, Rao V, Christakis GT, Williams WG. Overexpression of transforming growth factor-beta1 and insulin-like growth factor-I in patients with idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1997;96:874–881. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.96.3.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Travers JG, Kamal FA, Robbins J, Yutzey KE, Blaxall BC. Cardiac fibrosis: The fibroblast awakens. Circ Res. 2016;118:1021–1040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Petrov VV, Fagard RH, Lijnen PJ. Stimulation of collagen production by transforming growth factor-beta1 during differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Hypertension. 2002;39:258–263. doi: 10.1161/hy0202.103268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li B, Chen H, Yang X, Wang Y, Qin L, Chu Y. Knockdown of eIF3a ameliorates cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2016;62:97–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang M, Pan X, Zou Q, Xia Y, Chen J, Hao Q, Wang H, Sun D. Notch3 Ameliorates cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2016;16:316–324. doi: 10.1007/s12012-015-9341-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao M, Zheng S, Yang J, Wu Y, Ren Y, Kong X, Li W, Xuan J. Suppression of TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway by sesamin contributes to the attenuation of myocardial fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Khalil H, Kanisicak O, Prasad V, Correll RN, Fu X, Schips T, Vagnozzi RJ, Liu R, Huynh T, Lee SJ, et al. Fibroblast-specific TGF-β-Smad2/3 signaling underlies cardiac fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3770–3783. doi: 10.1172/JCI94753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Massagué J. TGFβ signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:616–630. doi: 10.1038/nrm3434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schmierer B, Hill CS. TGFbeta-SMAD signal transduction: Molecular specificity and functional flexibility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:970–982. doi: 10.1038/nrm2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee SJ, Park K, Ha SD, Kim WJ, Moon SK. Gleditsia sinensis thorn extract inhibits human colon cancer cells: The role of ERK1/2, G2/M-phase cell cycle arrest and p53 expression. Phytother Res. 2010;24:1870–1876. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yin Y, Guan Y, Duan J, Wei G, Zhu Y, Quan W, Guo C, Zhou D, Wang Y, Xi M, Wen A. Cardioprotective effect of Danshensu against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and inhibits apoptosis of H9c2 cardiomyocytes via Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;699:219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang W, Liu HT. MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res. 2002;12:9–18. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data used or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.