Abstract
Purpose
The institutional database of the Thyroid Surgery Division in China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University was queried to audit time trend patterns in thyroid cancer (TC) management between 2008 and 2017.
Methods
Retrospective longitudinal analysis. Clinicopathological features and treatment strategies were analyzed. Frequencies and multivariate tests were used to detect correlations.
Results
Clinical data were obtained from 15,000 TC patients (i.e., 71.3% of 21,044 operations). Papillary was the most common histological subtype (n = 14,916, 99%), and 76% were microcarcinomas. Stage I (95%) and low-risk patients (58%) were prevalent throughout the 10-year period. The trend for total thyroidectomy increased from 29.1% (2008–2012) to 67.9% (2013–2015), and then dropped to 48.6% (2016–2017). A total of 8827 (52%) patients received central lymph node dissection (CLND). The tendency for CLND increased from 15.7 to 86.4% during the 10-year period. While the trend of lateral lymph node dissection decreased from 71.3 to 13.3%. Radioactive iodine therapy was offered to 10% of patients (2008–2012), except for a low value (5.4%) in 2009, and then increased from 12.3% (2012) to 41.3% (2015), while decreased to 32.4% (2017).
Conclusion
The surgical management of TC patients has undergone continuous changes over the past 10 years. The evolution from aggressive treatment to a more conservative approach has been constant. Our results suggest that the current surgical management approach for TC is adequate and in support of the published guidelines. Our findings warrant further investigation to determine the clinical implications of decision making for TC.
Keywords: Thyroid cancer, Incidence, Surgery, Cancer registration, China, Guidelines
Introduction
An increase in thyroid cancer (TC) incidence has been reported by studies conducted in the People’s Republic of China [1–19]. In 2013, China had an overall age-standardized TC incidence rate of 7.56/100,000, according to the Chinese National Cancer Registry, which ranked seventh in overall cancers [1–19]. Analysis showed that the most commonly diagnosed group are females in their 30s and 40s. The crude mortality of TC in China is 0.52/100,000. The incidence and mortality rates of TC are higher in females than in males and higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Eastern areas had the highest incidence, followed by central and western areas [1].
Endocrinologists and surgeons have consistently focused on improving treatment, perioperative management, and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy to enhance the outcomes of TC in China [20–24]. TC management guidelines have been translated, updated, and transferred into Chinese clinical practice (Table 1) [20–24]. Today, TC, which includes mostly papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), is a treatable disease with a good prognosis [16–19]. The core of TC management includes removal of the tumor either by thyroidectomy or thyroid-conserving surgery (i.e., lobectomy) [19]. However, no research has reported TC surgical trends or the influential factors of these trends in China [1–19]. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the rates of different thyroidectomies and related factors in TC patients to determine whether they played a role in the modalities of surgery performed at Thyroid Surgery Division in China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University over a 10-year period (2008–2017).
Table 1.
Institution | Features | Recommendations | Recommendation rating | Referencesa |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009 ATA guidelines | MTD > 1 cm, there are contralateral thyroid nodules, or regional or distant metastases, with personal history of radiation therapy to the head and neck, or first-degree family history of DTC, older age (>45 years) | Near-total or total thyroidectomy | A | 112, 116, 122, 123, 156, 157, 161, 162 |
Small (<1 cm), low risk, unifocal, intrathyroidal papillary carcinomas in the absence of prior head and neck irradiation or radiologically or clinically involved cervical nodal metastases (cN1a) | Lobectomy | A | – | |
Clinically involved central or lateral neck lymph nodes (cN1) | Therapeutic CLND | B | 56, 139, 181 | |
Advanced primary tumors (T3 or T4) | Prophylactic CLND | C | 174, 175 | |
Small (T1 or T2), noninvasive, clinically node-negative PTCs and most FTC | Near-total or total thyroidectomy without prophylactic CLND | C | – | |
Biopsy-proven metastatic lateral cervical lymphadenopathy. | Therapeutic LLND | B | – | |
2012 Chinese guidelines | MTD > 4 cm, or with gross extrathyroidal extension (cT4), or cN1, or distant sites (cM1) | Near-total or total thyroidectomy | C | 46 |
MTD > 1 cm and <4 cm without extrathyroidal extension (ETE), and cN0 | Near-total or total thyroidectomy or lobectomy | C | 45 | |
MTD < 1 cm without ETE and cN0 in the absence of prior head and neck irradiation, and no nodules in the contralateral lobe | Lobectomy | C | – | |
Differentiated thyroid cancer | CLND | B | 47, 48, 49 | |
Biopsy-proven metastatic lateral cervical lymphadenopathy | Therapeutic LLND | B | 52, 53 | |
2015 ATA guidelines | MTD > 4 cm, or with cT4, or cN1, or distant sites (cM1) | Near-total or total thyroidectomy | Strong | 318, 319, 320, 321 |
MTD > 1 cm and <4 cm without ETE, and cN0 | Near-total or total thyroidectomy or lobectomy | Strong | 318, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327 | |
MTD < 1 cm without ETE and cN0 (unless there are clear indications to remove the contralateral lobe) | Lobectomy | Strong | – | |
cN1a | Therapeutic CLND | Strong | 334, 346, 347, 349, 359–366 | |
PTC with cN0 who have advanced primary tumors (T3 or T4), cN1b, or if the information will be used to plan further steps in therapy | Prophylactic CLND | Weak | 344, 345, 353–356 | |
Small (T1 or T2), noninvasive, clinically node-negative PTC and for most follicular cancers | Thyroidectomy without prophylactic CLND | Strong | – | |
Biopsy-proven metastatic lateral cervical lymphadenopathy | Therapeutic LLND | Strong | 379–381 |
aReferences are numbered as in the original guideline
Materials and methods
Study design
A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in line with STROCSS criteria [25].
Setting
The Thyroid Surgery Division in China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University is the largest referral and academic thyroid surgery center in the northeastern region of China. The number of outpatients exceeds 100,000 per year, and the number of inpatients exceeds 3500 per year. Patients are mainly from three northeastern provinces in China. The division is a training center for endocrine surgery in China with international cooperation with surgeons from Europe and Asia.
Participants
All TC patients in the period between 2008 and 2017 who underwent thyroidectomy in the hospital were included in our study. Surgeries were performed by general surgeons with special training in TC surgery. TC diagnosis was based on histopathology reports from surgical specimens [26]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: occult cancer, patients who had surgery outside our hospital, recurrent TC or history of TC, incomplete follow-up, TC and parathyroid disease. Preoperative thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxine-4, and free thyroxine-3 measurements and neck ultrasonography were performed for all patients who qualified for surgical treatment [26]. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and preoperative computer tomography were not routinely employed. All patients required L-tyrosine supplementation after surgical treatment [26]. The follow‐up period was from the date of surgery to the date of the last clinical follow‐up.
Data source, collection, and variables
The Institutional Electronic Database of the Thyroid Surgery Division in China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University was queried to audit time trend patterns in TC management between 2008 and 2017. Information on patients treated in the unit is prospectively collected for continuous monitoring of quality indicators. Data include deidentified patient information on histology, preoperative work-up, surgery, multidisciplinary management, and follow-up. The local database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent surgery for primary TC. Data were collected through completion of a three-part patient data sheet. The first part included demographic data. The second part included information regarding the operation, such as the type of surgery, year of operation, and administration of RAI. The third part included information regarding the histopathological nature of the tumors. The institutional database represents 100% of the admissions in the Thyroid Surgery Division. Data can be weighted such that the results can be extrapolated. Procedure and diagnostic codes are recorded using the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification.
Surgery
Patients in this study underwent open or endoscopic surgeries. The primary lesion was excised at the same time that the cervical lymph nodes were dissected. According to the results of intraoperative frozen sections, ipsilateral lobe and isthmus resection was performed for unilateral primary lesions, total thyroidectomy (TT) was performed for unilateral primary lesions requiring iodine 131 treatment. We generally performed the lymph node dissection (LND) of ipsilateral cervical central VI, which was recommended in China [23]. For all bilateral primary lesions, TT and bilateral cervical central VI LND were performed. Additional lateral compartment neck dissections, including levels II–IV, were performed if metastases were present in the lateral compartment, and no level I or V LND was performed unless lymph node metastasis to level I or V.
Definitions
Tumor stages were defined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual, 8th Edition [27]. The risk of recurrence was defined according to the risk stratification system of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) of American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines published in 2015 [26].
Outcomes analysis
The measured outcomes were newly treated TC, demographic data, pathological characteristics [maximum tumor diameter (MTD), location, multifocality, extrathyroid extension (ETE) (identified as “the invasion of the cancer penetrated through the capsule and even reached the outside of the thyroid gland: perithyroidal soft tissues or strap muscles”), thyroiditis, coexisting nodular goiter, histological subtype, lymph node metastasis (LNM)] and treatment strategies [thyroidectomy, lobectomy, LNDs, and RAI].
Stratification
To obtain the time trend study population, TC patients were stratified into subgroups for subsequent analyses.
Age
An age-stratified analysis was performed for the following groups: children (<18 years); youth (19–44 years); middle age (45–59 years); elderly (60+ years).
Thyroid gland surgery
The patients were stratified by the extent of the primary surgical procedure: TT; near TT; sub-TT; lobectomy + isthmusectomy; <lobectomy (i.e., nodulectomy).
Lymph node dissection
Solely thyroidectomy (without LND); central LND (CLND); CLND + lateral LND (LLND); and LLND without CLND.
The decision to perform a different type of surgery was made jointly by the patient and surgeon. Technical aspects of the procedures have been described previously [26, 28].
TC guidelines
Temporal trends were evaluated over three time intervals to evaluate the distribution of surgical methods in each period, depending on the published time management guidelines for adult patients with TC [20–24, 26, 29]. Period I, before 2012 Chinese guidelines published (i.e., 2008–2012); Period II, after 2012 Chinese guidelines published (i.e., 2013–2015); and Period III, after 2015 ATA guidelines published (i.e., 2016–2017).
Pathology
Group I included patients with DTC < 1 cm, without ETE, without clinical evidence of any LNM (N0). Group II included patients with DTC > 1 cm and <4 cm or with microscopic ETE and N0. Group III included patients with DTC > 4 cm or with gross ETE (T4), multifocality, or clinically apparent metastatic disease to nodes (N1) or distant sites (M1). Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) had MTD < 1 cm.
Dominant vs. contralateral thyroid lobe features
To analyze possible causes of changes in surgical management during the study period, we evaluated the US characteristics of the dominant and contralateral thyroid nodules. By definition, the dominant lobe is the larger thyroid lobe, the lobe affected by a suspected or proven tumor, the side with a hyperfunctioning hot nodule, and in a multinodular goiter, the lobe with larger and/or the greater number of nodules or the lobe causing compression symptoms [30]. Thyroid nodules were defined according to thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) classification [20, 31–33].
Bias
Selection bias was reduced by including all the TC patients. In addition, given to the observational design of this study, the indication bias could not be excluded.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were summarized by arithmetic means, standard deviations, and medians, and categorical values by weighted frequency and percentage (%). Data were analyzed using Student’s t test and Kruskal–Wallis H test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All hypothesis tests were two sided. All the data were analyzed retrospectively by a statistician. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 19.0, and charts were generated using Origin version 8.0.
Results
Population
During the 10-year study period, 21,044 patients underwent surgery for various thyroid diseases. A total of 15,915 (75.6%) patients had a diagnosis of TC, and 915 (5.7%) were excluded from the analysis. Among them, 903 (5.6%) subjects underwent reoperation, 5 (0.03%) had incomplete information, and 7 (0.04%) had nonprimary TC. Finally, the analysis included 15,000 patients who underwent primary surgery with TCs and complete information for this study (Fig. 1).
Surgical volume
Of the 15,000 TC patients selected, 214 (1.4%) underwent endoscopic surgery, and previous studies published by the center have compared the safety of endoscopic surgery and open surgery [34]. Preoperative FNA use increased from 0 to 92% over the 10-year period (Fig. S1).
Demographics
A total of 11,805 patients were females (78.7%), with a male to female ratio of 1:3.69. There were significant differences in the sex ratio during the study period. The mean age was 42.88 ± 9.56 years. TC was most common in female youth (19–44 years). The highest TC incidence was observed in youth (56.5%), followed by the middle-aged group (39%). Elderly patients and children constituted 4% and 0.3% of the total, respectively. During the 10-year period, the age group distribution was significantly different (p < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Year of diagnosis | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 15,000 | 151 | 574 | 691 | 847 | 1130 | 1770 | 2233 | 2265 | 2482 | 2857 | |
Sex | ||||||||||||
Male | 3195 (21.3) | 27 (17.9) | 102 (17.8) | 142 (20.6) | 185 (21.8) | 246 (21.8) | 430 (24.3) | 482 (21.6) | 484 (21.4) | 502 (20.2) | 595 (20.8) | 0.043 |
Female | 11,805 (78.7) | 124 (82.1) | 472 (82.2) | 549 (79.4) | 662 (78.2) | 884 (78.2) | 1340 (75.7) | 1751 (78.4) | 1781 (78.6) | 1980 (79.8) | 2262 (79.2) | |
Age groups | ||||||||||||
Children (<18 years) | 40 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (0.4) | 3 (0.4) | 5 (0.4) | 4 (0.2) | 5 (0.2) | 9 (0.4) | 2 (0.1) | 9 (0.3) | <0.05 |
Youth (19–44 years) | 8475 (56.5) | 86 (57.0) | 331 (57.7) | 390 (56.4) | 497 (58.7) | 635 (56.2) | 1018 (57.5) | 1334 (59.7) | 1298 (57.3) | 1394 (56.2) | 1492 (52.2) | |
Middle age (45–59 years) | 5864 (39.1) | 57 (37.8) | 223 (38.9) | 267 (38.6) | 324 (38.3) | 434 (38.4) | 693 (39.2) | 823 (36.9) | 851 (37.6) | 979 (39.4) | 1213 (42.5) | |
Elderly (60+ years) | 621 (4.1) | 8 (5.3) | 20 (3.5) | 31 (4.5) | 23 (2.7) | 56 (5.0) | 55 (3.1) | 71 (3.2) | 107 (4.7) | 107 (4.3) | 143 (5.0) | |
Histological type | ||||||||||||
PTC | 14,916 (99.4) | 146 (96.7) | 567 (98.8) | 684 (99.0) | 842 (99.4) | 1122 (99.3) | 1763 (99.6) | 2222 (99.5) | 2252 (99.4) | 2473 (99.6) | 2845 (99.6) | >0.05 |
FTC | 6 (0.04) | 2 (1.3) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) | 2 (0.1) | |
MTC | 73 (0.5) | 1 (0.7) | 6 (1.1) | 7 (1.0) | 5 (0.6) | 8 (0.7) | 7 (0.4) | 9 (0.4) | 12 (0.5) | 8 (0.3) | 10 (0.4) | |
ATC | 5 (0.03) | 2 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.09) | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
MTD (median, cm) | 0.6 | – | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | >0.05 |
Multifocality | 6052 (40.4) | 40 (26.5) | 184 (32.1) | 272 (39.4) | 325 (38.4) | 425 (37.6) | 700 (39.5) | 963 (43.1) | 947 (41.8) | 1051 (42.3) | 1145 (40.1) | <0.05 |
Extrathyroid extension | 2018 (13.5) | 4 (2.7) | 13 (2.3) | 41 (5.9) | 45 (5.3) | 102 (9.0) | 221 (12.5) | 236 (10.6) | 375 (16.6) | 427 (17.2) | 554 (19.4) | <0.05 |
Nodular goiter present | 11,642 (77.6) | 126 (83.4) | 491 (85.5) | 406 (58.8) | 620 (73.2) | 913 (80.8) | 1435 (81.1) | 1777 (79.6) | 1664 (73.5) | 1822 (73.4) | 2388 (83.6) | >0.05 |
Thyroiditis present | 3285 (21.9) | 48 (31.8) | 174 (30.3) | 201 (29.1) | 235 (27.7) | 255 (22.6) | 358 (20.2) | 402 (18) | 497 (21.9) | 481 (19.4) | 634 (22.2) | >0.05 |
LNM | 6326 (42.2) | 44 (29.1) | 198 (34.5) | 299 (43.3) | 317 (37.4) | 404 (35.8) | 738 (41.7) | 968 (43.4) | 1039 (45.9) | 1095 (44.1) | 1224 (42.8) | <0.05 |
Central LNM | 3706 (24.7) | 13 (8.6) | 96 (16.7) | 118 (17.1) | 104 (12.3) | 126 (11.2) | 340 (19.2) | 567 (25.4) | 622 (27.5) | 790 (31.8) | 930 (32.6) | |
Lateral LNM | 2620 (17.5) | 31 (20.5) | 102 (17.8) | 181 (26.2) | 213 (25.1) | 278 (24.6) | 398 (22.5) | 401 (18) | 417 (18.4) | 305 (12.3) | 294 (10.3) | |
Lobes of cancer | ||||||||||||
Left lobe | 5012 (33.4) | 63 (41.7) | 199 (34.7) | 218 (31.6) | 278 (32.8) | 379 (33.5) | 619 (35.0) | 727 (32.6) | 761 (33.6) | 818 (33.0) | 950 (33.3) | <0.05 |
Right lobe | 5731 (38.2) | 59 (39.1) | 238 (41.5) | 261 (37.8) | 309 (36.5) | 465 (41.2) | 652 (36.8) | 846 (37.9) | 820 (36.2) | 950 (38.3) | 1131 (39.6) | |
Isthmus | 153 (1.0) | 6 (4.0) | 18 (3.1) | 17 (2.5) | 26 (3.1) | 15 (1.3) | 15 (0.9) | 16 (0.7) | 13 (0.6) | 12 (0.5) | 15 (0.5) | |
Bilaterlity | 4100 (27.3) | 23 (15.2) | 119 (20.7) | 195 (28.2) | 232 (27.4) | 271 (24.0) | 484 (27.3) | 644 (28.8) | 670 (29.6) | 702 (28.3) | 760 (26.6) | |
8th AJCC/TNM stage | ||||||||||||
Stage I | 14,383 (95.9) | 134 (88.7) | 545 (95.0) | 667 (96.5) | 825 (97.4) | 1089 (96.4) | 1715 (96.9) | 2139 (95.8) | 2165 (95.6) | 2366 (95.3) | 2738 (95.8) | <0.05 |
Stage II | 531 (3.5) | 1 (0.7) | 19 (3.3) | 19 (2.8) | 18 (2.1) | 34 (3.0) | 52 (2.9) | 87 (3.9) | 89 (3.9) | 105 (4.2) | 107 (3.8) | |
Stage III | 23 (0.2) | 2 (1.3) | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.2) | 1 (0.1) | 3 (0.1) | 4 (0.2) | 5 (0.2) | 3 (0.1) | |
Stage IV | 41 (0.3) | 2 (1.3) | 1 (0.2) | 3 (0.4) | 2 (0.2) | 5 (0.4) | 2 (0.1) | 4 (0.2) | 7 (0.3) | 6 (0.2) | 9 (0.3) | |
Unknown | 22 (0.2) | 12 (8.0) | 8 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Risk stratification of recurrence | ||||||||||||
Low risk | 8761 (58.9) | 58 (39.2) | 380 (66.9) | 389 (57.1) | 498 (59.4) | 683 (61.2) | 1027 (58.4) | 1379 (62.2) | 1295 (57.7) | 1427 (57.7) | 1625 (57.3) | <0.05 |
Intermediate risk | 5683 (38.2) | 86 (58.1) | 175 (30.8) | 268 (39.4) | 319 (38.0) | 403 (36.1) | 687 (39.1) | 778 (35.1) | 876 (39.1) | 967 (39.1) | 1124 (39.6) | |
High risk | 438 (2.9) | 4 (2.7) | 13 (2.3) | 24 (3.5) | 22 (2.6) | 31 (2.8) | 45 (2.6) | 60 (2.7) | 72 (3.2) | 78 (3.2) | 89 (3.1) |
Histopathology
Of 15,000 TCs, 14,916 were PTCs (99.4%), 73 were medullary (0.5%), 6 were follicular (0.04%), and 5 were anaplastic (0.03%) (Table 2). The median MTD was 0.6 (0.01–6.5) cm. Coexistence of goiter or thyroiditis occurred in 11,642 (77.6%) or 3285 (21.9%) histological specimens, severally, and remained stable throughout the study period. Incidence of ETE increased from 2.6 to 19.3% over time. TC multifocality increased from 26.4 to 40.1%. LNM incidence increased from 29.2 to 42.8%, which mainly depended on the increased incidence of central LNM (CLNM), while the rate of lateral LNM was increased from 20.5% in 2008 to 26.2% in 2010 and decreased to 10.3% until 2017. The most common location of TC was the right side (n = 5731, 38.2%), followed by the left lobe (n = 5012, 33.4%), bilaterally (n = 4100, 27.3%), and the isthmus (n = 153, 1.0%). Group I (i.e., DTC < 1 cm, without ETE, N0) included 4700 patients (31.5%); Group II (DTC > 1 and <4 cm, or with microscopic ETE, N0) included 830 patients (5.5%); and Group III (DTC > 4 cm, or with gross ETE, N1, M1) included 9391 patients (62.9%). Stratification features remained stable during the study period. Stage I and low-risk patients remained prevalent during the 10-year period (95.9% and 58.9%, respectively) (Fig. S2). Of the patients, 13,897 were pT1 (92.6%), 8674 (53.8%) were pN0, and 14,964 (99.7%) were M0. PTMC was found in 11,403 patients (76.5%) and non-PTMC in 3513 patients (23.6%). The number of PTMC increased over time. Among all the patients undergoing surgery, only six patients had positive margins.
Management methods
Trends in the extent of thyroidectomy
In total, most patients underwent TT (n = 7844, 52.3%), followed by lobectomy + isthmusectomy (n = 4249, 28.3%), near TT (n = 2527, 16.8%), sub-TT (n = 320, 2%), and nodulectomy (n = 64, 0.4%). Before 2012 Chinese guidelines published (from 2008 to 2012), the most common surgery was near TT (n = 2045, 60.3%), followed by TT (n = 989, 29.1%), lobectomy + isthmusectomy (n = 232, 6.8%), and sub-TT (n = 90, 2.6%). After 2012 Chinese guidelines published (from 2013 to 2015), the rate of near TT decreased to 6.4%, while the rate of TT increased to 67.9%, and the rate of lobectomy + isthmusectomy increased to 24.7%. Since 2015 ATA guidelines published (from 2016 to 2017), the rate of near TT decreased to 1.5%, the rate of TT decreased to 48.6%, and the rate of lobectomy + isthmusectomy increased to 46.2%. (Fig. 2). To evaluate the distribution thyroidectomies for DTC over the 10-year period, we divided 15,000 patients into three groups by tumor features, and noted that the majority of patients in Groups I and II received lobectomy + isthmusectomy (48.3% and 41.3%, respectively), and the majority of patients in Group III underwent TT (69.0%). The tendencies for thyroidectomies in three Groups were shown in Fig. 3.
Dominant vs. contralateral thyroid lobe features
In order to analyze the reasons why the patients with similar pathology features chose different surgery than those guidelines recommended, we evaluated thyroid lobe features in these three groups. In Group I patients who received near TT or TT, the TI-RADS classification was higher than grade IV in the contralateral thyroid nodules (37%), followed by multiple nodules > 1 cm (32%), nodules > 3 cm (21%), patient symptoms (8%), and false-positive FNA result (2%). In Group II, the patients who underwent lobectomy + isthmusectomy included no nodule (59%), nodule < 8 mm and TI-RADS < grade III (24%) in the contralateral lobe, negative FNA result (13%), and patient symptoms (4%). In Group III, patients who received lobectomy + isthmusectomy included negative FNAB results (63%), no nodule (33%), nodule < 8 mm and TI-RADS < grade III (12%) in the contralateral lobe, and patient symptoms (2%) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Patientsa in Group I | Patientsb in Group II | Patientsc in Group II | Patientsd in Group III | |
---|---|---|---|---|
False-positive result of FNAB | 2% | 1% | – | – |
Nodules > 3 cm | 21% | 17% | – | – |
Multiple nodules > 1 cm | 32% | 23% | – | – |
TI-RADS classification > grade IV | 37% | 54% | – | – |
Negative result of FNAB | – | – | 13% | 63% |
No nodule | – | – | 59% | 33% |
Nodule < 8 mm with TI-RADS classification < grade III | – | – | 24% | 12% |
Patient symptoms | 8% | 5% | 4% | 2% |
TI-RADS thyroid imaging reporting and data system
aPatients who underwent near or total thyroidectomy in Group I
bPatients who underwent near or total thyroidectomy in Group II
cPatients who underwent lobectomy + isthmusectomy in Group II
dPatients who underwent lobectomy + isthmusectomy in Group III
Trends in LND
A total of 8827 patients (58.8%) underwent CLND, and 5675 patients (37.8%) underwent CLND + LLND. Three hundred patients (2%) underwent thyroidectomy without LND. A total of 198 patients (1.3%) underwent LLND without CLND. Before 2012 Chinese guidelines published (from 2008 to 2012), the most common surgery was CLND + LLND (n = 2420, 71.3%), followed by CLND (n = 532, 15.7%), thyroidectomy without LND (n = 243, 7.2%), and LLND without CLND (n = 198, 5.8%). After 2012 Chinese guidelines published (from 2013 to 2015), the rate of CLND increased to 58.7%, while the rate of CLND + LLND decreased to 40.6%, the rate of thyroidectomy without LND and LLND without CLND had dropped to close to 0. Since 2015 ATA guidelines published (from 2016 to 2017), the rate of CLND increased to 86.4%, however, the rate of CLND + LLND decreased to 13.3% (Fig. 4a). We then evaluated the accuracy of LNDs. CLNM in patients undergoing central compartment clearance decreased from 35% in 2008 to 17.5% in 2013 and then increased to 36.2% in 2017 (Fig. 4b). CLNM (N1a) of patients undergoing CLND + LLND increased from 6.6% in 2008 to 21.4% in 2014 and decreased to 5% in 2017. Lateral LNM (N1b) of patients undergoing CLND + LLND increased from 34.4% in 2008 to 88.6% in 2017.
RAI
Of the 10,273 adults (>18 years) who underwent near TT or TT, 2870 (27.6%) patients received RAI. The RAI therapy feature showed a stable trend in 2008–2012 (10%), except for a low value in 2009 (5.4%), which increased from 12.3% in 2012 to 41.3% in 2015 and decreased to 32.4% in 2017 (Fig. 5a). In total, 5473 (51.6%) were low-risk patients, 4681 (44.8%) were intermediate-risk patients, and 394 (3.7%) were high-risk patients. Low-risk and intermediate-risk patients increased from 2008 to 2015 (Table 2). Trends of the percentage of patients undergoing RAI therapy in different risk groups were shown in Fig. 5b. The percentage of RAI therapy in the low-risk group was <5%. RAI therapy in the intermediate-risk group increased from 6.6% in 2008 to 26% in 2011, remained stable in 2011–2012, increased to 68% in 2015, and decreased to 52.0% in 2017. RAI therapy in the high-risk group showed an overall increasing trend during the period 2008–2015 and decreased until 2017 (71.2%); however, there was a plateau period from 2010 to 2012, and the percentage in the years 2009 and 2014 separately was lower than that in the previous year.
Discussion
What was the impact of guideline statements endorsing TT or lobectomy for TC on final surgical treatment during the last 10-year period?
Endocrine surgeons are increasingly aware of the need to address overtreatment in TC care [20–24, 33]. TC exemplifies these concerns because most newly diagnosed patients with a favorable prognosis are treated with multiple modalities for which the benefit of each treatment may be small, but the burden is cumulative and substantial [19]. This survey was designed to collect information on TC surgical management and present a 10-year trend. In a sample of 15,000 TC patients undergoing thyroid surgery between 2008 and 2017, the most notable finding was the decreasing proportion of patients receiving TT (from 71 to 41%) and the increasing proportion receiving lobectomy—from 14 to 50%. However, TC patients who underwent lobectomy also underwent LNDs significantly more frequently. Furthermore, in our institution, FNAB use increased from 0 to 90%. TT was the most common treatment during the early period, but the emergence of lobectomy has triggered a shift. The use of lobectomy has increased after years of steadily decreasing rates. The decrease in TT surgery after lobectomy demonstrates the benefit of evidence-based guidelines in accelerating changes to clinical practice to reduce overtreatment [20–24, 26]. Although lobectomy as a surgical approach has lower morbidity, an important downside to its use is the historically high rate of additional reoperations after initial lobectomy, ranging from 5 to 10% in published reports [35]. According to the data in our center, six patients (1.4%) underwent primary lobectomy and reoperation for recurrence. These data, however, did not fully represent the incidence of recurrence for patients with lobectomy. The authors found that prophylactic CLND can definitely reduce the recurrence rate of DTC [36, 37]. The increase in lobectomy was accompanied by a marked increase in the use of additional CLND after initial lobectomy during the study period. We also found that the prophylactic LLND was gradually giving a way to therapeutic LLND in the last decade. These variations were mainly because prophylactic LLND was not recommended, while prophylactic CLND has been recommended by the Chinese guidelines since 2012 [23]. In addition, the increased rate of lateral LNM may depend on preoperative information availability from FNAB. We also found that the treatment strategy in our institution was adjusted according to the features of the contralateral lobe of cancer foci.
Clinicopathological trends
Our study showed that the most common histological type of TC was PTC. PTMC also increased over time. These might be associated with the increased rate of TC screening in China and use of FNA in our institution. Cho et al. also reached a similar conclusion that the incidence of TC might be associated with the increased use of US screening [38]. In the present study, we found that TCs were limited to early stage (stage I, and low risk) tumors. The prevalence of lateral LNM was 10.3% in 2017, lower than 20.9% in a meta-analysis [39]. These results suggest that patients with TC in northeast China were more likely to have a favorable prognosis. However, we thought that clinicians should pay more attention to these early stage PTCs, which also showed increasing rates of multifocality and ETE over time. TC was most common in youth (19–44 years). Vaccarella et al. compared the age-specific incidence rates of TC among different countries and found that TC increased, particularly in young/middle-aged individuals [40]. Similarly, Araque et al. reported an increasing incidence of TC between the ages of 15 and 39 in the United States [41]. In addition, it was interesting to found that the incidence of right lobe cancer was significantly higher than left lobe cancer. The specific reason for this result was still unclear and remains to further exploration.
RAI therapy
In our study, we noted that the percentage of RAI therapy increased significantly during the period 2012–2015, and the number of intermediate- and high-risk patients and the percentage of RAI therapy in the above-mentioned two groups both increased rapidly. These data demonstrated that a substantial portion of the treated DTCs was overtreated during the period 2013–2015. The percentage of RAI therapy decreased from 2015 to 2017, consistent with the recommendations of the guidelines [26].
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of the study include its very large, contemporary, diverse patient sample, as well as the collection of clinical and pathological information after the promulgation of the guidelines. However, there were some limitations. The incidence and mortality of TC were not analyzed in this study, and the pathology specimens were not reanalyzed. Follow-up and disease recurrence information are not included in the current data. In the future, relevant clinical studies will be conducted with a focus on these issues.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated a significant decrease in the use of TT between 2008 and 2017, which resulted in a significant increase in the overall rate of lobectomy. This change seems to be associated with a change in the surgical approach regarding what constitutes adequate TC guideline adherence. Our findings also indicate that evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines that address issues of clinical controversy can effectively accelerate changes in clinical practice and reduce overtreatment in TC care.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank for the support from many clinicians (i.e., Guang Zhang, Le Zhou, Xuehai Bian, Xiaoli Liu, Shijie Li, Lina Zhao, Jingting Li, Qingfeng Fu, Hongbo Li, Yishen Zhao, Gaofeng Xue, Xueyan Zhang, Tie Wang, Changlin Li, Jiao Zhang, Jingwei Xin, Tianyu Yu, etc.) in the division. This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81702651 and 81972499), the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program (20180520123JH and 20190201275JC), the Program from the Education Department of Jilin Province (JJKH20190075KJ), and the Program of Jilin Provincial Finance Department (2018SCZ007).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1007/s12020-020-02230-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Du L, Li R, Ge M, Wang Y, Li H, Chen W, He J. Incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in China, 2008–2012. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2019;31(1):144–151. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.01.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao L, Pang P, Zang L, Luo Y, Wang F, Yang G, Du J, Wang X, Lyu Z, Dou J, Mu Y. Features and trends of thyroid cancer in patients with thyroidectomies in Beijing, China between 1994 and 2015: a retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang M, Yan C, Wei H, Lv Y, Ling R. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of thyroid cancer in northwest China: a population-based retrospective study of 2490 patients. Thorac. Cancer. 2018;9(11):1453–1460. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhu C, Li S, Gao X, Zhu G, Song M, Gao F. Retrospective analysis of thyroid nodules: thyroid cancer risk factors in Suzhou, China. Clin. Lab. 2018;64(3):333–338. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2017.170829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu S, Yang L, Yuan Y, Li H, Tian J, Lu S, Wang N, Ji J. Cancer incidence in Beijing, 2014. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2018;30(1):13–20. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Du L, Wang Y, Sun X, Li H, Geng X, Ge M, Zhu Y. Thyroid cancer: trends in incidence, mortality and clinical-pathological patterns in Zhejiang Province, Southeast China. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4081-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen WQ, Li H, Sun KX, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Zeng HM, Zou XN, Gu XY, He J. [Report of cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014] Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018;40(1):5–13. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yan HX, Pang P, Wang FL, Tian W, Luo YK, Huang W, Yang GQ, Jin N, Zang L, Du J, Ba JM, Dou JT, Mu YM, Lyu ZH. Dynamic profile of differentiated thyroid cancer in male and female patients with thyroidectomy during 2000-2013 in China: a retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):15832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14963-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang L, Zheng RS, Wang N, Zeng HM, Yuan YN, Zhang SW, Li HC, Liu S, Chen WQ, He J. [Analysis of incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in China, 2013] Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017;39(11):862–867. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fei X, Lou Z, Christakos G, Liu Q, Ren Y, Wu J. Contribution of industrial density and socioeconomic status to the spatial distribution of thyroid cancer risk in Hangzhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;613–614:679–686. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shah BR, Griffiths R, Hall SF. Thyroid cancer incidence among Asian immigrants to Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study. Cancer. 2017;123(17):3320–3325. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.F. Xiang, F. Huang, Y.Y. Zhang, Y.Q. Shao, N. Wang, Q.W. Jiang, [Trend in incidence of thyroid cancer in Jiading district of Shanghai, 2003–2013]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 50(7), 656–658 (2016) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Li K, Lin G, Zhou Q, Wu X. [Time trends of the incidence of thyroid cancer in urban Guangzhou, 2000–2011] Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015;49(2):142–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang L, Zheng R, Wang N, Zhang S, Chen W. [Analysis of incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in China, 2010] Zhonghua Yu Fang. Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;48(8):663–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Song K, Du L, Li H, Wang X, Mao W, Yu C. [Incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in six cancer registries of Zhejiang province, 2000-2009] Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014;49(6):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Du LB, Li HZ, Wang XH, Zhu C, Liu QM, Li QL, Li XQ, Shen YZ, Zhang XP, Ying JW, Yu CD, Mao WM. Analysis of cancer incidence in Zhejiang cancer registry in China during 2000 to 2009. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15(14):5839–5843. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu YQ, Zhang SQ, Chen WQ, Chen LL, Zhang SW, Zhang XD, Zheng RS. [Trend of incidence and mortality on thyroid cancer in China during 2003–2007] Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2012;33(10):1044–1048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, Wang W. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in Shanghai, China, 1983–2007. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP223–229. doi: 10.1177/1010539512436874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiang J, Wu Y, Li DS, Shen Q, Wang ZY, Sun TQ, An Y, Guan Q. New clinical features of thyroid cancer in eastern China. J. Visc. Surg. 2010;147(1):e53–e56. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cong SZ, Huang CW, Feng ZW. [Interpreted American College of Radiology TI-RADS classification system of ultrasonography for thyroid nodules in 2017 edition and the experiences in clinical application] Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019;54(1):73–77. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li XY, Zhang B, Lin YS. [The interpretation of 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer] Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017;52(4):309–315. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lan XB, Zhang H. [An introduction of surgical update in 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer] Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016;54(3):172–176. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chinese Medical Association Endocrinology Branch, Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Chin. J. Clinical Oncol. 39(17), 1249–1272 (2012)
- 24.Ya M. [Interpretation of the management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer (2012 Chinese edition)] Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;27(16):917–920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, Thavayogan R, Orgill DP, Group S. The STROCSS statement: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J. Surg. 2017;46:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67(2):93–99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bliss RD, Gauger PG, Delbridge LW. Surgeon’s approach to the thyroid gland: surgical anatomy and the importance of technique. World J. Surg. 2000;24(8):891–897. doi: 10.1007/s002680010173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules, Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dionigi G, Frattini F. Staged thyroidectomy: time to consider intraoperative neuromonitoring as standard of care. Thyroid. 2013;23(7):906–908. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, Cronan JJ, Beland MD, Desser TS, Frates MC, Hammers LW, Hamper UM, Langer JE, Reading CC, Scoutt LM, Stavros AT. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2017;14(5):587–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang X, Wei X, Xu Y, Wang H, Xin X, Zhang S. [Ultrasonic characteristics of thyroid nodules and diagnostic value of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in the ultrosound evaluation of thyroid nodules] Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015;37(2):138–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.An JH, Kim HY, Kim SG, Dralle H, Randolph GW, Piantanida E, Tanda ML, Dionigi G. Endpoints for screening thyroid cancer in the Republic of Korea: thyroid specialists’ perspectives. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2017;40(6):683–685. doi: 10.1007/s40618-016-0596-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang D, Zhang J, Dionigi G, Li F, Wang T, Li H, Liang N, Sun H. Recurrent laryngeal nerve morbidity: lessons from endoscopic via bilateral areola and open thyroidectomy technique. World J. Surg. 2019;43:2829–2841. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Callender GG, Carling T, Christison-Lagay E, Udelsman R. Surgery for thyroid cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2014;43(2):443–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liang J, Li Z, Fang F, Yu T, Li S. Is prophylactic central neck dissection necessary for cN0 differentiated thyroid cancer patients at initial treatment? A meta-analysis of the literature. ACTA Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2017;37(1):1–8. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu X, Zhang D, Zhang G, Zhao L, Zhou L, Fu Y, Li S, Zhao Y, Li C, Wu CW, Chiang FY, Dionigi G, Sun H. Laryngeal nerve morbidity in 1.273 central node dissections for thyroid cancer. Surg. Oncol. 2018;27(2):A21–A25. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho HN, Choi E, Seo DH, Park B, Park S, Cho J, Kim S, Park YR, Rhee Y, Choi KS. Determinants of undergoing thyroid cancer screening in Korean women: a cross-sectional analysis from the K-Stori 2016. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e026366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.So YK, Kim MJ, Kim S, Son YI. Lateral lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis for prevalence, risk factors, and location. Int J. Surg. 2018;50:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vaccarella S, Dal Maso L, Laversanne M, Bray F, Plummer M, Franceschi S. The impact of diagnostic changes on the rise in thyroid cancer incidence: a population-based study in selected high-resource countries. Thyroid. 2015;25(10):1127–1136. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Araque DVP, Bleyer A, Brito JP. Thyroid cancer in adolescents and young adults. Future Oncol. 2017;13(14):1253–1261. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.