Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 15;23(12):e62–e67. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0595

Cancer Surveillance in Gorlin Syndrome and Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome

William D Foulkes 1, Junne Kamihara 2, D Gareth R Evans 3, Laurence Brugières 4, Franck Bourdeaut 5, Jan J Molenaar 6, Michael F Walsh 7, Garrett M Brodeur 8, Lisa Diller 2
PMCID: PMC7309678  NIHMSID: NIHMS1600359  PMID: 28620006

Abstract

Gorlin syndrome and rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS) are autosomal dominant syndromes associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset brain tumors. Individuals with Gorlin syndrome can manifest a wide range of phenotypic abnormalities, with about 5% of family members developing medulloblastoma, usually occurring in the first 3 years of life. Gorlin syndrome is associated with germline mutations in components of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway, including Patchedl (PTCH1) and Suppressor of fused (SUFU). SUFU mutation carriers appear to have an especially high risk of early-onset medulloblastoma. Surveillance MRI in the first years of life in SUFU mutation carriers is, therefore, recommended. Given the risk of basal cell carcinomas, regular dermatologic examinations and sun protection are also recommended. Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are tumors initially defined by the descriptive “rhabdoid” term, implying a phenotypic similarity with rhabdomyoblasts at the microscopic level. RTs usually present before the age of 3 and can arise within the cranium as atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors or extracranially, especially in the kidney, as malignant rhabdoid tumors. However, RTs of both types share germline and somatic mutations in SMARCB1 or, more rarely, SMARCA4, each of which encodes a chromatin remodeling family member. SMARCA4 mutations are particularly associated with small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT). The outcome following a diagnosis of any of these tumors is often poor, and the value of surveillance is unknown. International efforts to determine surveillance protocols are underway, and preliminary recommendations are made for carriers of SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 mutations.

Gorlin Syndrome

Introduction and clinical features

Gorlin syndrome (OMIM #109400), also known as Gorlin–Goltz syndrome, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS), or basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS), is a heritable cancer predisposition syndrome with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Gorlin and Goltz described a syndrome that included multiple basal cell carcinomas, jaw cysts, and bifid ribs in 1960 (1). The incidence of Gorlin syndrome is approximately one in 15,000 births (2). Affected individuals can have multiple phenotypic abnormalities, with characteristic features described in over 50% of individuals that may include coarse facial appearance, macrocephaly, and hypertelorism (3, 4). Diagnostic criteria for Gorlin syndrome have been previously proposed and refined by several groups (3, 57). These share the following major criteria: (i) multiple basal cell carcinomas or basal cell carcinoma occurring at a young age (less than 30 years old at diagnosis), (ii) jaw keratocysts, (iii) plantar or palmar pits, (iv) lamellar calcification of the falx cerebri, and (v) first-degree relative with Gorlin syndrome. Approximately 75% of individuals with Gorlin syndrome have a first-degree relative with the syndrome, with the remainder presumably representing de novo germline mutations. Full diagnostic criteria have been recently outlined by Jones and colleagues (8).

Individuals with Gorlin syndrome are at risk for developing both benign and malignant neoplasms. Multiple basal cell skin carcinomas are a hallmark of the syndrome, and they arise most frequently on the face, back, and neck (8). Men and women are equally affected, without any clear genotype–phenotype correlation for the timing or number of basal cell carcinomas that develop (8). These generally present in the teenage/young adult years, but these skin tumors have been reported in children as young as 2 years old (9, 10). Cardiac fibromas may develop in infants and ovarian fibromas in adolescent girls and women, and these may cause physiologic compromise of normal function, especially when calcified. Rhabdomyosarcomas and fetal rhabdomyomas have also been reported in Gorlin syndrome, although these histologies are quite rare (<10 reported cases of each), and they are notably absent from larger population-based studies of Gorlin syndrome (11). A wide spectrum of other tumors has been reported, but the relative risk of these other tumors in Gorlin syndrome patients is unclear.

Importantly, approximately 5% of individuals with Gorlin syndrome develop medulloblastoma (5, 12). Cases occur at a mean age of 2 years old, significantly younger than in patients with sporadic medulloblastoma. They are predominantly of the desmoplastic subtype and are often the first manifestation of the syndrome (1214). In one review of 36 cases, 24 medulloblastomas occurred by 2 years of age, with all but one (97%) of the remaining cases occurring by the age of 5 (14). In addition, patients who are survivors of medulloblastoma treated with therapeutic radiation have a high risk of developing a large number of basal cell carcinomas (>1,000) in the radiation field (15, 16).

Genes responsible for Gorlin syndrome

Germline mutations in genes of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway, including Patched1 (PTCH1) and Suppressor of fused (SUFU), are implicated in Gorlin syndrome (1721). Heterozygous germline mutations in PTCH1 have been detected in the majority of individuals with Gorlin syndrome. Less frequently, germline mutations in SUFU are observed (20).

Derangements of the SHH pathway have also been linked to the pathogenesis of sporadic medulloblastoma, with inactivating somatic mutations in the SHH pathway identified in both adult and pediatric medulloblastomas, as well as in basal cell carcinomas and selected other malignancies. These inactivating mutations act to derepress or activate SHH pathway signaling, which is normally active only during brain development.

The PTCH1 gene product is a receptor for SHH or other SHH-related ligands. SHH binding to PTCH1 results in an alteration in Smo (smoothened) activity; normal PTCH1 represses Smo and, when mutant, promotes Smo to activate the signaling complex comprised of Gli-1 (glioma-associated oncogene) and SUFU. Germline mutations in both SUFU and PTCH1 are associated with LOH of the remaining allele in the tumor and activation of the SHH pathway. This activation results in unregulated expression of pathways involved in proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis (22).

Genotype–phenotype correlations of medulloblastoma risk

The risk of medulloblastoma in individuals with germline PTCH1 mutations is low, estimated to be <2% from one large series in which two of 115 individuals with PTCH1-related Gorlin syndrome developed medulloblastoma (20). In contrast, SUFU-related Gorlin syndrome is highly associated with medulloblastoma predisposition, with three of nine Gorlin syndrome patients with germline SUFU mutations developing medulloblastoma in the same series (20). Germline nonsense mutations, missense mutations, and deletions in SUFU have been described in families with medulloblastoma (20, 23).

Young children with medulloblastoma but without obvious clinical features of Gorlin syndrome have also been found to be germline carriers of SUFU mutations. In one recent series, germline SUFU mutations were identified in eight of 131 medulloblastoma patients (23). Young age (<3 years) and specific histologic subtypes (extensive nodularity and desmoplastic/nodular types) were each associated with a higher likelihood of germline SUFU mutations (23).

Kool and colleagues (24) performed genomic profiling of 133 cases (83 pediatric and 50 adult) of SHH-related medulloblastomas (one of four major medulloblastoma subtypes), including matched germline testing when available. Among 60 tumors found to have PTCH1 mutations, two germline PTCH1 mutations were identified. Of 10 tumors with SUFU mutations, six were found to harbor the SUFU mutation in the germline (24).

Previously published tumor surveillance protocols for Gorlin syndrome family members

Carriers of germline mutations as well as those individuals meeting clinical criteria for Gorlin syndrome should be followed by a clinical geneticist or the equivalent for evaluation and management of a wide range of anatomic, skeletal, and other organ system abnormalities. Guidelines for early detection and prevention of benign and malignant neoplasms that occur in Gorlin syndrome have been proposed by others (3, 6, 25). These recommendations focus on dermatologic surveillance and avoidance of radiation, baseline echocardiogram to look for cardiac fibromas, jaw panorex for keratocyst identification, and ultrasound for ovarian fibromas. Annual brain MRIs have also been recommended until age 8(6). However, with the identification of the different risks of medulloblastoma in SUFU versus PTCH1 mutation carriers, Smith and colleagues have recommended MRI screening only among SUFU mutation carriers, with recommendations for these to occur on a frequent basis (20). Incidence of basal cell carcinomas may be less common in SUFU mutations carriers than in Gorlin linked to PTCH1 mutation (23), and jaw keratocysts have been predominantly described among PTCH1, but not SUFU, carriers (20).

Expert consensus recommendations

Our recommendations for tumor surveillance of gene carriers and members of syndromic families (Table 1) are based upon review of the literature and discussion in the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Workshop, held in Boston, Massachusetts, in October 2016, and include the following:

Table 1.

Gorlin syndrome surveillance recommendations

PTCH1 mutation carriers
Basal cell carcinoma screening annually by age 10, with increased frequency after first basal cell carcinoma observed
Baseline echocardiogram in infancy, dental exams with jaw X-ray every 12 to 18 months beginning at age 8, and an ovarian ultrasound by age 18
Low risk of medulloblastoma: no radiographic screening unless concerning neurologic exam, head circumference change, or other unusual signs or symptoms
If medulloblastoma: radiation-sparing treatment given risk of radiation-induced skin cancers
SUFU mutation carriers
Same as PTCH1 mutation carriers, with the exception of no jaw X-rays, as keratocysts have not been described
Additional medulloblastoma screening: consider every-4-month brain MRI through age 3 and then every-6-month brain MRI until the age of 5a. Radiation-sparing treatments are again recommended if a brain tumor should occur.
a

Data to support optimal frequency and timing of imaging are not currently available.

General recommendations in caring for medulloblastoma patients

Clinicians caring for pediatric patients newly diagnosed with medulloblastoma should complete a full physical/skin exam and an extended family history, including assessment of family members with a history of any of the maj or or minor criteria, especially basal cell carcinoma. Children with medulloblastoma, in particular children <3 years old or those whose tumors show nodular or desmoplastic histologic features and/or somatic changes in the SHH pathway, should undergo genetic testing for germline mutations in PTCH1 and SUFU.

Genetic testing of at-risk family members

Because medulloblastoma is the most life-threatening tumor of childhood Gorlin syndrome, and in these individuals usually present by age 2, consideration of very early genetic diagnosis among family members (infants) is recommended. Phenotypic features of the syndrome may not be apparent in infants, as these develop over time. Thus, in families with known mutations, predictive, site-specific testing of PTCH1 and/or SUFU should be performed in infants, and families who otherwise meet clinical criteria should be offered diagnostic testing. Genetic counseling to identify all young, at-risk family members should be performed. In addition, counseling and testing of family members anticipating childbearing are recommended.

PTCH1 mutation carriers

Basal cell carcinoma screening should be conducted annually beginning by age 10, and more frequent exams should be performed after the first basal cell carcinoma is observed. Germline mutation carriers should undergo a baseline cardiac echo in infancy, annual dental exams with jaw X-ray starting at age 8, and an ovarian ultrasound at age 18. No radiographic brain imaging is recommended given the low risk of medulloblastoma, but in the setting of concerning neurologic exams, head circumference changes, or other unusual signs or symptoms, the possibility of a posterior fossa tumor should be considered, with appropriate imaging. If medulloblastoma occurs, radiation-sparing treatment techniques should be considered given the risk of radiation-induced skin cancers.

Medulloblastoma screening recommendations for SUFU mutation carriers

There are currently little data to support the optimal surveillance frequency and modality for medulloblastoma screening. However, given the young age of onset, some centers recommend frequent MRIs in infants with a pathogenic germline mutation in SUFU. We suggest a brain MRI every 4 months through age 3 and then changing to every 6 months until the age of 5. As in PTCH mutation carriers, if medulloblastoma occurs, radiation-sparing treatment techniques should be considered given the risk of radiation-induced skin cancers.

Summary and future directions

Gorlin syndrome is a medulloblastoma predisposition syndrome associated with germline mutations in genes in the SHH pathway. International collaborative efforts are needed to validate the screening recommendations above, in particular to better understand risk and timing/frequency of medulloblastoma surveillance.

Given major interest in the application of targeted therapies in medulloblastomas, particularly for the treatment of the SHH subtype with SHH inhibition, it is likely that paired tumor/germline testing will lead to the identification of a greater number of individuals with germline mutations in PTCH1, SUFU, or other SHH pathway genes. As individu als who may not otherwise fit conventional Gorlin syndrome phenotypes may be identified, and our molecular understanding of the syndrome grows, expansion and refinement of current clinical criteria are likely to evolve.

Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndromes

Introduction

Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are aggressive soft tissue tumors that generally present between 1 and 3 years of age, but they can arise in older patients (26). Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) arise in the central nervous system (CNS), and malignant RTs (MRT) arise in extracranial tissues, most often the kidney. The “rhabdoid” cells present in these tumors were so named because they are composed of cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm that histologically resemble developing rhabdomyoblasts (27). However, the cellular component can be variable and may consist of undifferentiated “small round blue cells,” with mesenchymal and epithelial components. In some cases, the rhabdoid component may be completely absent from the tumor, and the tumor cells consist solely of the small cell embryonal component (26), so the diagnosis in these cases relies upon loss of the relevant protein (see below). The exact incidence of RTs is difficult to determine because the tumors are rare and, until recently, were difficult to diagnose with confidence. However, one study of 106 children with extracranial MRTs in the United Kingdom calculated the annual incidence to be 0.6 per 1 million children, with the incidence decreasing with increasing age: 5 per million in the first year of life, down to 0.04 per million at age 10 to 14 years (28). MRTs make up 14% of all soft tissue sarcomas diagnosed in the first year of life (28), and they constitute 18% of all renal cancers in infants, but this number decreases to approximately 2% in children between ages 1 and 14 (28). AT/RTs are considerably more frequent, accounting for 6% to 7% of all CNS neoplasms in patients below age 7 (29). Astudy on AT/RT patients in the United States calculated an incidence of 0.7 AT/RTs per million, and as high as 5.4 per million in children below 1 year of age (29).

Genes responsible for RT predisposition

The vast majority of RTs are characterized by loss-of-function mutations in SMARCB1, with few other genetic abnormalities. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that a small fraction of RTs are characterized by loss-of-function mutations in SMARCA4 instead. These genes respectively encode the SMARCB1 (also called INI1 or BAF47) and SMARCA4 (also called BRG1) proteins, which are both members of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes. Mutations in these genes result in loss of expression of the encoded proteins. Indeed, immunohistochemical detection of SMARCB 1 loss is now included in the diagnostic criteria of malignant RTs.

RTs can present in a familial setting, with up to 35% of cases due to germline mutations (30, 31). Patients who carry a germline mutation in SMARCB1 have RT predisposition syndrome type 1 (RTPS1; OMIM #609322), whereas those with SMARCA4 germline mutations have RT predisposition syndrome type 2 (RTPS2; OMIM #613325). These mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, with a second “hit,” in the form of either a somatic mutation or LOH of the wild-type allele in the tumor. Although the penetrance of germline SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 mutations is still unknown, it appears that SMARCA4 mutations are less penetrant for AT/RT than SMARCB1. It has been suggested that all patients who present with RTs be tested for the presence of germline mutations (26). In addition, relatives of proven germline carriers should be tested for the familial mutation.

RTs are frequently fatal, but in rare cases, RTs can present in families, and relatives of patients may develop RTs or other tumors (3234). Indeed, SMARCB1 mutation carriers may be at risk for developing other tumors, including schwannomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, cribriform neuroepithelial tumors, meningiomas, and other rare tumors (Table 2; refs. 3539). Furthermore, germline carriers are at risk for developing second primary tumors(31). Inastudy of 100 patients with SMARCB1-mutated AT/RTs and MRTs, six of the 35 germline (17%) carriers had two primary tumors, most cases being synchronous occurrences (31). Eight patients had inherited mutations from unaffected parents, two of whom had gonadal mosaicism. However, two carrier fathers had developed schwannomas, and one carrier mother developed a benign CNS lesion (31).

Table 2.

Conditions associated with SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 germline mutations

SMARCB1 carriers Mutation type

Rhabdoid tumor LoFa
Schwannomatosis LoF and missense
Multiple meningiomas Missense
Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome Missense
Coffin-Siris syndrome Missense
MPNST LoF
SMARCA4 carriers Mutation type

MRT LoF
AT/RT LoF
SCCOHT LoF
Coffin-Siris syndrome Missense

Abbreviations: LoF, loss of function; MPNST, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; SCCOHT, small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.

a

One missense mutation has been seen (31).

SMARCA4 female mutation carriers have a higher risk of developing small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), which can be regarded as a special type of MRT and was found to be very similar to RTs in clinical, histologic, genomic, and epigenomic characteristics (4042). Although these tumors represent a distinct clinical entity, the similarities to MRT have led some to suggest that SCCOHT be considered part of the rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS) spectrum of tumors (Table 3).

Table 3.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of RTPS spectrum tumors

MRT (intra-/extracranial) SCCOHT (ovarian RT)
Median age of onset 20 months (birth through adulthood, with most cases in infancy/early childhood) 24 years (14 months-56 years)
5-year survival 10%–30% ~33%
Cell type Rhabdoid cells prominent, small cell component usually present, rhabdoid cells may be difficult to identify 50% small cell, 50% large cell (resembling rhabdoid cells)
Germline mutations (%) 35% 43%
Genes mutated/protein expression lost SMARCB1 (>98%) SMARCA4 (>98%)
SMARCA4 (<2%) SMARCB1 (<2%)

No specific genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified that associate location of mutation and organ of RT presentation. Missense (and most often gain-of-function) mutations in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 are most often associated with rare developmental syndromes, including Coffin-Siris syndrome (43, 44) and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome (45). However, missense SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 mutations have been identified in RTs and SCCOHT (31, 46), and loss-of-function mutations have been seen in developmental disorders (47). Both missense and nonsense SMARCB1 mutations have been seen in schwannomatosis, but the nonsense mutations may be localized to specific regions of the gene and are thought to be hypomorphic loss of function (48).

Recommended surveillance protocols for RTs

No formal recommendations for surveillance of carriers have been established yet, as penetrance remains unclear and RTs can arise in multiple tissues. When considering screening for SMARCB1-related RTs, it is important to note the following points: (i) the very young age at diagnosis of RT; (ii) the difficulties of screening for these aggressive tumors associated with rapid onset; (iii) the potential risk for second malignancy, the spectrum of which is unknown; and (iv) the extreme rarity of familial cases. We recommend surveillance guidelines as summarized in Table 4. The recommendations for known carriers of truncating germline SMARCB1 mutations include every-3-month MRI of the brain, as well as ultrasound of the abdomen/kidneys during early infancy through age 5. Whole-body MRI maybe considered, but there are little data to guide clinicians in terms of best timing and schedule for this.

Table 4.

Suggested surveillance for rhabdoid tumors

Gene Organ at risk Type of mutation
Germline truncating Germline missense
SMARCB1 Brain MRI q 3 months to age 5 years No screening, generally no/very low risk
Abdomen Consider WBMRI to age 5 years, undetermined frequency. Ultrasound q 3 months No screening, generally no/very low riska
SMARCA4 Brain No data available, risks likely very low
Abdomen No data available, risk likely low to very low
Ovary No data available, abdominal ultrasound q 6 months may be justified, role, if any, of MRI unknown. Preventive oophorectomy may be justified outside of the pediatric age range

Abbreviations: q, every; WBMRI, whole-body MRI.

a

Schwannomas may result from missense mutations and may justify MRI.

For female relatives of SMARCA4 mutation carriers, there are no official recommendations, but periodic ultrasounds have been suggested for younger women, and prophylactic oophorectomies are recommended for older women (49). The penetrance for SCCOHT in germline carriers of SMARCA4 is not well established. For female carriers of a germline mutation, genetic counseling and prophylactic oophorectomy should be considered after completion of puberty. The risk of SCCOHT and the decision to undergo prophylactic surgery will be individualized and informed by the family history, the age of the patient, the patient’s reproductive plans, and by emerging data that will help with estimation of risk. SMARCA4-deficient SCCOHT has not been seen in women over age 60 (42), so screening recommendations can be altered in older women.

Conclusions

Germline mutations in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 lead to RTPS, with risk of developing intra- and extracranial RTs, extremely aggressive tumors with young age of onset. The ongoing and detailed characterization of AT/RT and MRT (50, 51) will likely lead to further biological insights that can better delineate molecular subtypes of these tumors and may lead to novel therapeutic avenues. Despite this progress, how best to approach early cancer surveillance for germline carriers at risk for these rare and aggressive tumors is likely to remain an area of significant clinical challenge.

Acknowledgments

W.D. Foulkes would like to thank Dr. Leora Witkowski for her contribution to this article.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Gorlin RJ, Goltz RW. Multiple nevoid basal-cell epithelioma, jaw cysts and bifid rib. A syndrome. N Engl J Med 1960;262:908–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Evans DG, Howard E, Giblin C, Clancy T, Spencer H, Huson SM, et al. Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: Estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A:327–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimonis VE, Goldstein AM, Pastakia B, Yang ML, Kase R, DiGiovanna JJ, et al. Clinical manifestations in 105 persons with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1997;69:299–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shanley S, Ratcliffe J, Hockey A, Haan E, Oley C, Ravine D, et al. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: review of 118 affected individuals. Am J Med Genet 1994;50:282–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Evans DG, Ladusans EJ, Rimmer S, Burnell LD, Thakker N, Famdon PA. Complications of the naevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: Results of a population based study. J Med Genet 1993;30:460–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bree AF, Shah MR, Group BC. Consensus statement from the first inter-national colloquium on basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS). Am J Med Genet A 201l;155A:2091–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kimonis VE, Mehta SG, Digiovanna JJ, Bale SJ, Pastakia B. Radiological features in 82 patients with nevoid basal cell carcinoma (NBCC or Gorlin) syndrome. Genet Med 2004;6:495–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones EA, Sajid MI, Shenton A, Evans DG. Basal cell carcinomas in gorlin syndrome: A review of 202 patients. J Skin Cancer 2011;2011:217378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ton*elo A, Vicente A, Navan*o L, Planaguma M, Bueno E, Gonzalez-Sarmiento R, et al. Early-onset acral basal cell carcinomas in Gorlin syndrome. Br J Dermatol 2014;171:1227–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Diociaiuti A, Inserra A, De Vega IF, Rota C, Surrenti T, Giraldi L, et al. Naevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome in a 22-month-old child present-ing with multiple basal cell carcinomas and a fetal rhabdomyoma. Acta Derm Venereol 2015;95:243–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hettmer S, Teot LA, Kozakewich H, Werger AM, Davies KJ, Fletcher CD, et al. Myogenic tumors in nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2015;37:147–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans DG, Famdon PA, Burnell LD, Gattamaneni HR, Birch JM. The incidence of Gorlin syndrome in 173 consecutive cases of medulloblas-toma. Br J Cancer 1991;64:959–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schofield D, West DC, Anthony DC, Marshal R, Sklar J. Correlation of loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 9q with histological subtype in medul-loblastomas. Am J Pathol 1995;146:472–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amlashi SF, Riffaud L, Brassier G, Morandi X. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: Relation with desmoplastic medulloblastoma in infancy. A population-based study and review of the literature. Cancer 2003;98: 618–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Strong LC. Geneticand environmental interactions. Cancer 1977;40:1861–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evans DG, Birch JM, Orton CI. Brain tumours and the occurrence of severe invasive basal cell carcinoma in first degree relatives with Gorlin syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 1991;5:643–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Famdon PA, Del Mastro RG, Evans DG, Kilpatrick MW. Location of gene for Gorlin syndrome. Lancet 1992;339:581–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hahn H, Wicking C, Zaphiropoulous PG, Gailani MR, Shanley S, Chi-dambaram A, et al. Mutations of the human homolog of Drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Cell 1996;85: 841–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johnson RL, Rothman AL, Xie J, Goodrich LV, Bare JW, Bonifas JM, et al. Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome. Science 1996;272:1668–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smith MJ, Beetz C, Williams SG, Bhaskar SS, O’Sullivan J, Anderson B, et al. Germline mutations in SUFU cause Gorlin syndrome-associated child-hood medulloblastoma and redefine the risk associated with PTCH1 mutations. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:4155–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pastorino L, Ghiorzo P, Nasti S, Battistuzzi L, Cusano R, Marzocchi C, et al. Identification of a SUFU germline mutation in a family with Gorlin syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A: 1539–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kieran MW. Targeted treatment for sonic hedgehog-dependent medullo-blastoma. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:1037–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bmgieres L, Remenieras A, Pien*on G, Varlet P, Forget S, Byrde V, et al. High frequency of germline SUFU mutations in children with desmoplastic/ nodular medulloblastoma younger than 3 years of age. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2087–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kool M, Jones DT, Jager N, Northcott PA, Pugh TJ, Hovestadt V, et al. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell 2014;25:393–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Evans DG, Famdon PA. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJH, et al. editors. GeneReviews [Internet], Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993 2002. June 20 [updated 2015 Oct 1]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sredni ST, Tomita T. Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome. Pediatric Develop Pathol 2015;18:49–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haas JE, Palmer NF, Weinberg AG, Beckwith JB. Ultrastructure of malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney: A distinctive renal tumor of children. Human Pathol 1981;12:646–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brennan B, Stiller C, Bourdeaut F. Extracranial rhabdoid tumours: What we have learned so far and future directions. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: e329–e36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ostrom QT, Chen Y, M. de Blank P, Ondracek A, Farah P, Gittleman H, et al. The descriptive epidemiology of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors in the United States, 2001–2010. Neuro-Oncol 2014;16:1392–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bourdeaut F, Lequin D, Brugières L, Reynaud S, Dufour C, Doz F, et al. Frequent hSNF5/INIl germline mutations in patients with rhabdoid tumor. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Eaton KW, Tooke LS, Wainwright LM, Judkins AR, Biegel JA. Spectmm of SMARCB 1/INI 1 mutations in familial and sporadic rhabdoid tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:7–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schneppenheim R, Friihwald MC, Gesk S, Hasselblatt M, Jeibmann A, Kordes U, et al. Germline nonsense mutation and somatic inactivation of SMARCA4/BRG1 in a family with rhabdoid tumor predisposition syn-drome. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:279–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Witkowski L, Lalonde E, Zhang J, Albrecht S, Hamel N, Cavallone L, et al. Familial rhabdoid tumour “avant la lettre’—from pathology review to exome sequencing and back again. J Pathol 2013;231: 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ammerlaan ACJ, Ararou A, Houben MPWA, Baas F, Tijssen CC, Teepen JLJM, et al. Long-term survival and transmission of INI 1-mutation via nonpenetrant males in a family with rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome. Br J Cancer 2007;98:474–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Boyd C, Smith MJ, Kluwe L, Balogh A, MacCollin M, Plotkin SR. Alterations in the SMARCB 1 (INI1) tumor suppressor gene in familial schwannomatosis. Clinical Genetics 2008;74:358–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hasselblatt M, Oyen F, Gesk S, Kordes II, Wrede B, Bergmann M, et al. Cribriform neuroepithelial tumor (CRINET): A nonrhabdoid ventricular tumor with INI 1 loss and relatively favorable prognosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2009;68:1249–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Christiaans I, Renter SB, Brink HC, van Os TAM, Baas F, van den Munckhof P, et al. Germline SMARCB 1 mutation and somatic NF2 mutations in familial multiple meningiomas. J Med Genet 2011;48: 93–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Forest F, David A, Arrufat S, Pieman G, Ranchere-Vince D, Stephan J- L, et al. Conventional chondrosarcoma in a survivor of rhabdoid tumor: Enlarging the spectmm of tumors associated with SMARCB 1 germline mutations. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;36:1892–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Evans DGR, Huson SM, Birch JM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in inherited disease. Clin Sarcoma Res 2012;2:17-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fahiminiya S, Witkowski L, Nadaf J, Can*ot-Zhang J, Goudie C, Hasselblatt M, et al. Molecular analyses reveal close similarities between small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type and atypical teratoid/ rhabdoid tumor. Oncotarget 2015;7:1732–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Foulkes WD, Clarke BA, Hasselblatt M, Majewski J, Albrecht S, McCluggage WG. No small surprise - small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type, is a malignant rhabdoid tumour. J Pathol 2014;233:209–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Witkowski L, Goudie C, Ramos P, Boshari T, Brunet J- S, Kamezis AN, et al. The influence of clinical and genetic factors on patient outcome in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141:454–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Santen GWE, Aten E, Vulto-van Silfhout AT, Pottinger C, van Bon BWM, van Minderhout IJHM, et al. Coffin-Sins syndrome and the BAF complex: genotype-phenotype study in 63 patients. Human Mutation 2013;34: 1519–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tsumsaki Y, Okamoto N, Ohashi H, Kosho T, Imai Y, Hibi-Ko Y, et al. Mutations affecting components of the SWI/SNF complex cause Coffin-Sins syndrome. Nat Genet 2012;44:376–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wieczorek D, Bogershausen N, Beleggia F, Steiner-Haldenstatt S, Pohl E, Li Y, et al. A comprehensive molecular study on Coffin-Sins and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndromes identifies a broad molecular and clinical spectmm converging on altered chromatin remodeling. Hum Mol Gen 2013;22: 5121–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Witkowski L, Canot-Zhang J, Albrecht S, Fahiminiya S, Hamel N, Tomiak E, et al. Germline and somatic SMARCA4 mutations characterize small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Nat Genet 2014;46:438–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stavropoulos DJ, Merico D, Jobling R, Bowdin S, Monfared N, Thimva-hindrapuram B, et al. Whole-genome sequencing expands diagnostic utility and improves clinical management in paediatric medicine. Npj Genomic Medicine 2016; 1:15012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smith M, Wallace A, Bowers N, Rustad C, Woods CG, Leschziner G, et al. Frequency of SMARCB 1 mutations in familial and sporadic schwannomatosis. Neurogenetics 2012;13:141–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Berchuck A, Witkowski L, Hasselblatt M, Foulkes WD. Prophylactic oopho-rectomy for hereditary small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2015;12:20–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chun H-Jung E, Lim Emilia L, Heravi-Moussavi A, Saberi S, Mungall Karen L, Bilenky M, et al. Genome-wide profiles of extra-cranial malignant rhabdoid tumors reveal heterogeneity and dysregulated developmental pathways. Cancer Cell 2016;29:394–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Johann P D, Erkek S, Zapatka M, Kerl K, Buchhalter I, Hovestadt V, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors are comprised of three epigenetic sub-groups with distinct enhancer landscapes. Cancer Cell 2016;29:379–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES