Skip to main content
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical logoLink to Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
. 2020 Jun 22;53:e20190106. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0106-2019

Infections and antimicrobial resistance in an adult intensive care unit in a Brazilian hospital and the influence of drug resistance on the thirty-day mortality among patients with bloodstream infections

Sebastiana Silva Sabino 1, Caio Augusto de Lima 1, Luiz Gustavo Machado 2, Paola Amaral de Campos 2, Astrídia Marília de Souza Fontes 1, Paulo Pinto Gontijo-Filho 1, Rosineide Marques Ribas 1
PMCID: PMC7310365  PMID: 32578698

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

The present study aimed to determine the incidence of health care-associated infections (HCAIs) and identify the main resistant microorganisms in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a Brazilian university hospital.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Brazilian teaching hospital between 2012 and 2014.

RESULTS:

Overall, 81.2% of the infections were acquired in the ICU. The most common resistant pathogenic phenotypes in all-site and bloodstream infections were oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. (89.9% and 87.4%; 80.6% and 70.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is an urgent need to focus on HCAIs in ICUs in Brazil.

Keywords: Intensive care unit, Infections associated with health care, Multidrug-resistant organism, Bloodstream infections


Hospital infections, as well as mortality rates, remain higher in low- and middle-income countries than in developed countries 1 , 2 . Furthermore, the frequency of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections and antimicrobial resistance rates are at least two- to three-fold higher in such countries 3 . Brazilian hospitals face major challenges in detecting and controlling antimicrobial resistance, and the limitations in microbiological assessments are highlighted by the scarce information available on antimicrobial resistance 4 , 5 . Risk factor recognition may be related to this scenario, particularly in ICUs at the regional level. Hence, because risk factors create complications during antibiotic prescription - which requires clinicians to consider multidrug-resistant bacteria - predisposing individuals to poor outcomes, risk recognition is an essential component of preventive strategies 2 , 6 . The increase in antibiotic resistance is a persistent issue. Compared with Europe and the United States, Brazil and other Latin American countries have higher levels of antimicrobial resistance in non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase, as well as in some gram-positive organisms (including Staphylococcus aureus) 7 , 8 , 9 .

The present study aimed to determine the incidence of health care-associated infections (HCAIs) and identify the main resistant microorganisms in adult patients admitted to ICUs at a teaching hospital in Brazil.

The study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital affiliated with the Federal University of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. This hospital has 530 beds, of which 30 are in the adult ICU. Incidence data were obtained from consecutive patients admitted to the adult ICU between 2012 and 2014. Bacterial identification and susceptibility tests were performed in the hospital laboratory using a VITEK-2® Automated System (bioMérieux). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee under protocol number 1.627.990.

Patients admitted to the unit between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 were considered “new patients.” All patients, both new and old, were counted once during the study and all patients who were re-hospitalized during the study period and who remained in the ICU for less than 24 hours were excluded 10 . HCAIs were defined according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Atlanta, USA) criteria.

The overall HCAI frequency was estimated by calculating the cumulative incidence (number of cases of HCAIs/total number of patients included in the study). The total mortality rate was also estimated, and different microorganisms isolated from monomicrobial or polymicrobial infections were identified.

Over the 3-year study period, a total of 2168 patients (both new and old) with a mean age of 55 years (37.2% female) were enrolled in the study. Among patients infected with antimicrobial resistant pathogens, factors associated with HCAIs included nephropathy, surgery, trauma, and invasive procedures.

A total of 1979 HCAI episodes were observed in these patients, with an incidence rate of 55.1%. Most nosocomial infections were acquired in the ICU (81.2%), while the remainder (18.8%) were acquired in other wards. Bloodstream (33.4%) and lung (30.5%) infections were the most common, followed by urinary tract infections (16.6%). Overall, 1722 of the 1979 episodes were monomicrobial and 257 were polymicrobial. The mortality rate among patients who developed HCAIs was 37.8% (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Description and epidemiological indicators of nosocomial infections in the adult intensive care unit assessed in the present study.

Variables N/Total (%)
Number of patients included in the study 2168
Number of new patients 1576
Cumulative incidence (CI) 869/1576 (55.1)
HCAI* acquired in the hospital 163/869 (18.7)
HCAI acquired in the intensive care unit 706/869 (81.2)
Total episodes of infection 1979/2168 (91.3)
Blood 661/1979 (33.4)
Lung 605/1979 (30.5)
Urine 329/1979 (16.6)
Surgical site 121/1979 (6.1)
Others** 263/1979 (13.2)
Monomicrobial etiology 1722/1979 (87.0)
Mixed etiology 257/1979 (13.0)
Total mortality (%) 416/1576 (26.4)
Thirty-day mortality among patients with HCAIs in the ICU 267/706 (37.8)

*HCAIs = Health care-associated infections; **Catheter tip (n=239); Spinal head fluid (n=6); Tissue fragment (n=1); Other secretions (n=17).

The microbiological analysis of the pathogens and the major resistant phenotypes in HCAI infections at all sites and in the bloodstream are presented in Table 2. Overall, of the 2217 isolates obtained, gram-positive cocci (GPC) were identified in 33.7%, GNB in 56.1%, and yeast in 10.1%. Overall, among the GPC, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (58.6%, 438/748) were the most common, while among the GNB, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (27.4%, 341/1245) was the most common, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (20.3%, 253/1245) and Klebsiella spp. (14.5%, 180/1245).

TABLE 2: Epidemiologically important isolated microorganisms and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in patients in the adult intensive care unit assessed in the present study (January 2012 to December 2014).

Microorganisms/Phenotypic resistance Prevalence of microorganisms
All sites Blood
N* = 2217 (%) N* = 1257 (%) N* = 787 (%) N* = 494 (%)
Staphylococcus aureus/oxacillin 219 (9.8) 124 (56.6) 41 (5.2) 29 (70.7)
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp./ oxacillin 438 (19.7) 394 (89.9) 356 (45.2) 311 (87.4)
Enterococcus spp./vancomycin 76 (3.4) 10 (13.2) 30 (4.0) 5 (16.7)
Others (gram-positive cocci) 15 (0.7) - 6 (0.8) -
Total 748 (33.7) 528 (42.0) 433 (55.0) 345 (79.7)
Escherichia coli/3rd and 4th g. cephalosporins 96 (4.3) 42 (43.8) 16 (2.3) 5 (31.2)
Klebsiella spp./3rd and 4th g. cephalosporins 180 (8.1) 138 (76.7) 43 (5.5) 28 (65.1)
Enterobacter spp./3rd and 4th g. cephalosporins 137 (6.2) 91 (66.4) 44 (5.6) 27 (61.4)
Serratia spp./3rd and 4th g. cephalosporins 138 (6.2) 72 (52.2) 42 (5.3) 15 (35.7)
Others: Enterobacteriaceae species 48 (3.8) - 15 (2.0) -
Pseudomonas aeruginosa/carbapenem 341 (15.4) 182 (53.3) 54 (7.9) 32 (59.3)
Acinetobacter baumannii/carbapenem 253 (11.4) 204 (80.6) 60 (8.7) 42 (70.0)
Others: non-fermenters 52 (2.3) - 6 (0.8) -
Total 1245 (56.1) 729 (58.0) 280 (35.6) 149 (53.2)
Candida albicans 107 (4.8) - 32 (4.1) -
Other Candida spp. 98 (4.4) - 35 (4.4) -
Other yeasts 19 (0.9) - 7 (0.9) -
Total 224 (10.1) - 74 (9.4) -

*Phenotypic resistance of the microorganisms.

In the 787 blood isolates, the most frequently observed groups/pathogens were CoNS (45.2%), followed by GNB (35.6%) and yeast (9.4%). Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenters were observed in 57.1% (160/280) and 48.2% (120/280) of the isolates, respectively. Overall, the most prevalent bloodstream infection (BSI) agents were CoNS (45.2%), followed by A. baumannii (8.7%) and P. aeruginosa (7.9%).

Among the major phenotypes, the most common ones identified from all-site infections and BSIs were oxacillin-resistant CoNS, (89.9% and 87.4%, respectively), carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, and wide-spectrum cephalosporin- resistant Klebsiella spp. (76.7% and 65.1%, 80.6% and 70.0%, respectively).

Brazilian studies have evaluated HCAI epidemiology in ICUs. The findings indicate a high prevalence in Brazil 8 , with clear evidence that the burden of these infections is higher in developing countries with limited resources 2 , 10 . In Brazil, both a higher prevalence of infection in ICUs (51.6%) and a clear association between infection and mortality (37.6%) are noted 11 .

In the present study, GNB comprised most of the isolates, and P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were the predominant organisms. However, BSIs are the most worrisome, and CoNS were the most common strain in these infections. GNB accounted for a significant percentage of these cases (35.6%), while Enterobacteriaceae family members (57.1%) and non-fermenters (42.0%) were among the most noteworthy pathogens identified in BSIs.

The present study also demonstrated high incidence rates of infections and infection episodes. The overall mortality rate (within 30 days) among patients with infections was 38.0%, higher than the average hospital mortality rate (26.4%). The most common HCAI sites were the lungs (pneumonia) and the bloodstream; these accounted for one-third of all HCAIs and were associated with the use of invasive procedures 1 , 12 , 13 . These infections are a leading cause of death in countries with limited resources, and the mortality rates are higher than those in high-income countries 14 , 15 .

The increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents 16 is a significant concern in low- and middle-income countries. It is amplified by several factors that include increasing antibiotic use and poor antibiotic control. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance is highly prevalent in hospitals and ICUs, as reported herein, which leads to limitations in infection prevention 7 .

In the present study, resistant/multidrug-resistant pathogens were the most frequently isolated pathogens from patients in the ICU and were present in most all-site and bloodstream isolates. Antimicrobial resistance is a growing challenge in the care of critically ill patients, particularly because it significantly increases morbidity, mortality rates, and costs related to ICU infections 17 , 18 . Oxacillin-resistant CoNS, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, and broad-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella spp. phenotypes were observed at high frequencies at all HCAI sites, mainly in BSIs.

This study has limitations due to its observational and retrospective nature and because it was performed at a single center. Our results may not be generalizable, and larger prospective studies are needed to confirm them.

In conclusion, ICU-acquired infections were common and often associated with the presence of resistant microorganisms. The most frequent ICU-acquired infections were BSIs in patients with positive blood cultures. Globally, the etiology of hospital infections includes mainly GNB as the most prevalent microorganisms, with a higher proportion of resistant organisms among key pathogen isolates. However, CoNS also frequently cause BSIs. This study provides information that will assist physicians in adopting more effective approaches for treating infections acquired in the hospital.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank FAPEMIG and CNPq for providing financial support.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Mehta A, Alvarez-Moreno C, Leblebicioglu H, Higuera F, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary for 2002-2007, issued January 2008. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(9):627–637. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allegranzi B, Bagheri-Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228–241. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Micek ST, Vazquez-Guillamet C, Kollef MH. Multi-drug resistance, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and mortality in Gram-negative severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):596–596. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0596-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Sax H, Dharan S, Pessoa-Silva CL, Donaldson L, et al. Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(10):641–652. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70600-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(1):1–12. doi: 10.1086/595011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Richards M, Thursky K, Buising K. Epidemiology, prevalence, and sites of infections in intensive care units. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;24(1):3–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rossi F. The Challenges of Antimicrobial Resistance in Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):1138–1143. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferreira ML, Fuga B, Cerdeira LT, Toshio C, Ribas RM. Genomic features of a clinical ESBL-producing and colistin-resistant hypermucoviscous K. quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae from Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2019;23(3):207–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jepse KS, Pedersen IK. The Antibiotic Challenge: Justifications for Antibiotic Usage in the World of Medicine. In: Jensen C., Nielsen S., Fynbo L, editors. Risking Antimicrobial Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan; Cham: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Compte-Villar D, Camacho AO, Ponce-de-León S, editors. Infection control in limited resources countries: challenges and priorities. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19(5):20–20. doi: 10.1007/s11908-017-0572-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Braga IA, Campos PA, Gontijo-Filho PP, Ribas RM, editors. Multi-hospital point prevalence study of healthcare-associated infections in 28 adults intensive care units in Brazil. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99(3):318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Silva E, Junior LD, Fernandes HS, Moreno R, Vincent JL, editors. Prevalence and outcomes of infections in Brazilian ICUs: a subanalysis of EPIC II study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012;24(2):143–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Angus DC, Zwirble WTL, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsk MR, editors. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analyses of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1303–1310. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Arabi Y, Al-Shirawi N, Memish Z, Anzueto A, editors. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults in developing countries: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12(5):505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yatin-Mehta Y, Jaggi N, Rosenthal VD, Kavathekar M, Sakle A, Munshi N, et al., editors. Device-associated infection rates in 20 cities of India, data summary for 2004-2013: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(2):172–181. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cormican MG, Jones RN, editors. Emerging resistance to antimicrobial agents in gram-positive bacteria. Enterococci, staphylococci and nonpneumococcal streptococci. Drugs. 1996;51(1):6–12. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600511-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Evans HL, Lefrak SN, Lyman J, Smith RL, Chong TW, McElearney ST, et al., editors. Cost of gram-negative resistance. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(1):89–95. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251496.61520.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gales AC, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS, editors. Antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacilli isolated from Latin America: results from sentry antimicrobial surveillance program (Latin America, 2008-2010) Diagn. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(4):354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine

RESOURCES