Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0234736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234736

Gross anatomy, histology and blood vessel topography of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps)

Elisabeth Engelke 1,*, Christiane Pfarrer 1, Katharina Radelof 2, Michael Fehr 2, Karina A Mathes 2
Editor: Jack Kottwitz3
PMCID: PMC7310682  PMID: 32574166

Abstract

Imaging techniques have proved to be crucial for diagnosis in reptile species. The topography of the internal organs of bearded dragons has been described in recent studies as meeting the small animal practitioners´ demand for knowledge concerning their anatomy. However, the nomenclature in the respective literature is not uniform, which could lead to misunderstandings concerning the respective and/or affected parts of the alimentary canal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide clear information on anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of bearded dragons including supplying blood vessels. For the dissection of the alimentary canal, 11 Inland Bearded Dragons (Pogona vitticeps) were used (five males, six females), which had been euthanised for clinical reasons other than those concerning the digestive tract or had died spontaneously. The supplying arteries were demonstrated by injecting red latex into the aorta, while the intestinal veins were filled with blue latex via the portal vein. Microscopic examination was carried out on specimens of seven additional bearded dragons using routine histologic procedures. Macroscopically, the sections of the alimentary canal from oral to aboral were distinguished into oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, colic ampulla, colic isthmus, rectum and cloaca. Differentiation of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum was only possible when considering the bile duct, the vasculature and the histology of the organ wall. Arteries supplying the oesophagus and the final straight part of the large intestine originated from the aorta in a segmental manner. Between these, three unpaired arteries arose from the aorta. Their branches supplied stomach and intestine excluding its last part. Based on the findings of the present study, a nomenclature for the different parts of the alimentary canal and the supplying blood vessels of bearded dragons is suggested which is well understandable for veterinary practitioners and is based on zoological knowledge of reptiles.

Introduction

The Inland (or Central) Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps) is an Australian agamid lizard species and is one of the most popular pet lizard species nowadays. These lizards are relatively easy to maintain and docile, so they make good pets [1]. Nevertheless, nearly 40 percent of lizard patients are affected by gastrointestinal disorders [2]. In some of these cases, e.g. foreign bodies, invagination or volvulus, a quick diagnosis is essential to save the animal’s life. Thus, imaging techniques play an important role. However, they have their limitations as ultrasound displays the stomach and the large intestine reliably, but not the small intestine [3]. In another ultrasound study, the gastrointestinal tract could be investigated best when it was empty or filled with liquids, otherwise the signal was blocked by gas [4]. Radiography after administering contrast medium has proved to be safe and informative [5, 6], as it not only shows the whole alimentary canal but also proves its patency. The alimentary canal is the part of the digestive tract, which follows the pharynx and terminates with the anus or vent [7, 8], and cannot be examined via direct inspection.

To meet the increased demand for anatomical knowledge about the alimentary canal of the bearded dragon, several studies were published recently [3, 5, 6, 9]. However, the nomenclature used is not uniform; the stated reason for this is the absence of an official nomenclature [9].

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to suggest a nomenclature for the different parts of the alimentary canal and the supplying blood vessels of bearded dragons, which is both, easily understandable for veterinary practitioners and conform to the zoological terminology of reptiles.

Material and methods

For the macroscopic examination, 11 adult bearded dragons were used (five males, six females), which had been euthanised for clinical reasons other than for those concerning the digestive tract, or had died spontaneously. The owners of the pets were asked for permission to use the cadavers for scientific purposes. The body length was measured from the tip of the snout to the vent (Snout Vent Length, SVL). The male lizards had an average SVL of 20.7 cm (+/- 2.36 cm, range from 17.0 to 23.0 cm) and the mean SVL of the six females was 18.5 cm (+/- 4.12, range from 11.8 to 23.5 cm).

Up until the examination, the cadavers had been stored at -18°C. After thawing, the body cavity was opened by an incision in the median line of the ventral body wall. In order to demonstrate the blood vessels, coloured latex (60%; Wurfbain Nordmann, Hamburg, Germany; colour: Alpina Voll- und Abtönfarbe, Alpina Farben, Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) was injected for the arteries into the heart ventricle of 11 specimens, and additionally for the gastrointestinal veins into the portal vein of seven specimens. After the latex had hardened, the topography of the alimentary canal was observed in situ and photographs were taken (Lumix DMC-FZ150, Panasonic Corporation, Kadoma, Japan). Subsequently, the total alimentary canal was removed from the coelom and spread out to identify the different parts of the canal and the supplying blood vessels. The canal was opened along its antimesenterial side in order to inspect and describe the mucosal surface. The specimens were photographed for documentation purposes. In addition, exact measurements of the sections of the alimentary canal were taken and have been published recently [6].

For the histologic examination, eight additional bearded dragons (three males, five females), were used. Their body weight ranged from 60 g to 365 g. They had been euthanised for clinical reasons, which did not affect the digestive system. The alimentary canal was exenterated, the lumen carefully rinsed with tap water and the specimens were fixed in Lilly’s formalin (10%, neutrally buffered, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) or in Bouin’s solution. The entire alimentary canal was cut into one to three samples (around 10 mm in length) per segment, depending on the segments’ length. The specimens were embedded in paraffin (Paraplast Bulk REF 36602012, Leica Mikrosysteme, Wetzlar, Germany), cut into 2–3 μm thick sections and stained with haematoxylin-eosin (HE) or Masson-Goldner trichrome.

The study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, Germany, and was also approved by the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, the regional office responsible for oversight of animal research (Protocol Number 33.9-42502-05-14A457).

Results

Gross anatomy

The body cavity, coelom, of the bearded dragon was lined by peritoneum, which was slightly pigmented in the cranial half of the body cavity, and black pigmented in the caudal half (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Male Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps), ventral aspect, coelom opened, alimentary canal and liver displaced to the right, arteries filled with red latex.

Fig 1

A oesophagus; B1 cardiac part; B2 body of stomach; B3 pyloric part of stomach; B4 pylorus; C1 duodenum; C2 jejunum; C3 ileum; D1 colic ampulla; D2 colic isthmus; D3 rectum; E vent; F pancreas; G spleen; H bile duct; K liver; J left testis; L left lung. 1 descending aorta; 2 gastric artery; 3 ileocolic artery; 4 celiac artery; 5 cranial mesenteric artery; 6 caudal mesenteric artery; 7 rectal arteries.

The caudal part of the pharynx was black pigmented and merged into the oesophagus at the cranial thoracic aperture. The pharynx was crossed ventrally by the trachea. Large arterial blood vessels, i.e. the aortic arches and the pulmonary arteries, were in close contact to the pharyngeal wall.

Following the pharynx, the alimentary canal began with the straight oesophagus (Fig 1A), which ran caudally between the two lungs (Fig 1L) and dorsal to the heart within its pericardium and the cranial parts of the liver (Fig 1K). Black pigmentation was also observed in the cranial part of the oesophagus and decreased gradually in the caudal direction until it was completely lost. Its caudal extent varied individually, but the pigmentation terminated always cranial to the stomach. The mucosa of the oesophagus showed thin longitudinal folds along its entire length (Fig 2A), which disappeared when the organ was stretched. The oesophagus merged into the cranial, cardiac part of the stomach without a macroscopically clearly visible border (Fig 1 B1). The main part of the stomach, the body (Fig 1 B2), was located paramedian on the left side of the coelom, where it ran caudolaterally. From its subsequent turn to the right, the pyloric part of the stomach (Fig 1 B3) continued caudomedially. In some animals, it continued even craniolaterally on the right side of the body cavity. The surface structure of the gastric mucosa was smooth along its entire length (Fig 2B). The stomach had a dorsal and a ventral mesogastrium. The dorsal mesogastrium originated median at the dorsal body wall where the descending aorta was located. It contained the gastric arteries and was attached to the dorsal margin of the stomach. Where the stomach turned to the right, the attachment of the mesogastrium stayed dorsal, taking the short way along the smaller curvature to the pylorus (Fig 1B4). The ventral mesogastrium connected the ventral gastric margin to the left lobe of the liver, forming the lesser omentum, and continued from the liver to the ventral body wall as the falciform ligament or ventral mesohepaticum. At the pyloric part, the lesser omentum attached cranially at the smaller curvature of the stomach. Thus, both mesogastria were located close together at the pylorus and the initial part of the duodenum. In this region, the lesser omentum contained the small, ventral lobe of the pancreas and the common bile duct as well as the portal vein in its caudoventral free border. Parallel to the caudal half of the stomach, the large dorsal lobe of the pancreas was located in the dorsal mesogastrium (Fig 1F). The body of the pancreas was located directly at the duodenum, opposite to the attachment of both mesogastria, connecting both pancreatic lobes. The dark coloured spleen (Fig 1G) could be found at the cranial end of the beige-coloured dorsal lobe of the pancreas. The stomach terminated with a clearly visible pylorus (Fig 1B4), which was marked by palpable musculature and a circular mucosal fold (Fig 2B/a), and opened into the small intestine. The diameter of the small intestine (Fig 1C1–1C3) was much smaller than that of the oesophagus and stomach. The small intestine formed an irregular U-shaped loop and was suspended by a comparatively long mesentery and a mesenteric plica between the duodenum and the colic ampulla. The first part of the small intestine, the duodenum (Fig 1C1), was joined by the clearly visible bile duct (Fig 1H). Its surface structure was characterised by tightly packed, comparatively high, and extremely undulating longitudinal folds (Fig 2C/b). The second part, the jejunum (Fig 1C2), was considerably longer than the duodenum. Its mucosal surface had folds similar to those of the duodenum. However, they were straighter, and therefore arranged in a looser manner (Fig 2D/b). The third part, the ileum (Fig 1C3), had a slightly smaller lumen than the jejunum, if the small intestine had been empty at the time of death. The ileal mucosa still showed numerous folds, but these had decreased remarkably in height and were straight longitudinally (Fig 2E/b). There was a distinct border to the large intestine (Fig 1D1–1D3) because its first part was extremely widened, almost forming a sphere, the colic ampulla (Fig 1D1). A circular mucosal fold marked the transition between the small and large intestine (Fig 2F/c). The mucosa of the colic ampulla lacked folds; instead, it showed small longitudinal protrusions (Fig 2F). At the dorsal mesenteric border of the colic ampulla, the opening (Fig 2F/d) to a 3 to 6 mm long, blind-ending diverticulum, the rudiment of the caecum, could be distinguished clearly in nine out of 11 animals. Opposite to the ileal orifice, the colon continued as a narrow and relatively short colic isthmus (Fig 1D2), of which the mucosal surface showed a pattern of protrusions like in the colic ampulla. Additionally, small longitudinal folds were present (Fig 2G), which could be flattened when distending this intestinal part manually. The colic isthmus merged into the final, nearly straight part of the large intestine, the rectum (Fig 1D3), which was remarkably wider again. The surface of the rectal mucosa showed very small protrusions (Fig 2H). Some predominantly longitudinal folds were present in these parts of the large intestine. In its caudal half, the rectum became gradually less voluminous before terminating in the cloaca (Figs 3, 4/E). The border between rectum and cloaca was visible through one circular mucosal fold, in one animal two folds were observed. The cranial part of the cloaca, the coprodeum, was separated by a single circular fold from the urodeum. This part had no definite border to the final part, the proctodeum, which opened with the vent (Fig 1E), a transverse slit, on the ventral body surface at the base of the tail.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Surface structure of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps): (A) oesophagus, (B) stomach, (C) duodenum, (D) jejunum, (E) ileum, (F) colic ampulla and caecum, (G) colic isthmus and (H) rectum. a pylorus; b intestinal folds; c ileal orifice; d caecocolic orifice.

Fig 3. Arteries of the alimentary canal of a male Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps), exenterated, fixed with pins to be displayed single-planed, left aspect; arteries filled with red latex.

Fig 3

A oesophagus; B1 cardiac part of stomach; B2 body of stomach; B3 pyloric part of stomach; B4 pylorus; C1 duodenum; C2 jejunum; C3 ileum; D1 colic ampulla; D2 colic isthmus; D3 rectum; E cloaca; F pancreas; G spleen; H bile duct. 1 descending aorta; 2 oesophageal arteries; 3 gastric arteries; 4, 4’ ileocolic artery; 5 celiac artery; 6 cranial mesenteric artery; 7 caudal mesenteric artery; 8 rectal arteries; 9 cloacal arteries; 10 duodenal artery; 11 jejunal arteries.

Fig 4. Vascularisation of the alimentary canal of a female Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps), exenterated, fixed with pins to be displayed single-planed, right aspect; arteries filled with red latex, veins filled with blue latex: veins labelled.

Fig 4

A oesophagus; B1 cardiac part; B2 body of stomach; B3 pyloric part of stomach; B4 pylorus; C1 duodenum; C2 jejunum; C3 ileum; D1 colic ampulla; D2 colic isthmus; D3 rectum; E cloaca; F pancreas; G spleen; H bile duct. 1 portal vein; 2 ventral gastric vein; 3 right dorsal gastric vein; 4 common mesenteric vein; 5 cranial mesenteric vein; 6 caudal mesenteric vein; 7 left dorsal gastric vein, 8 jejunal veins; 9 ileal vein; 10 colic veins; 11 rectal veins; 12 ventral gastric artery.

Vasculature

Most arteries supplying the alimentary canal originated from the descending aorta (Fig 3/1). In bearded dragons, two aortic arches arose from the left ventricle of the heart. The left arch was slightly stronger than the right one. Both aortae were very close to the cranial part of the oesophagus and each released three to four small and very short (length: 2–4 mm) arteries to this organ part. At the level of the 3rd to 4th thoracic vertebra, both aortae merged, forming one descending aorta (Fig 3/1). After the junction, two to four pairs of short (4–10 mm long) arteries originated from the aorta, and supplied the remaining part of the oesophagus in a segmental manner (Fig 3/2). At the level of the 6th to 7th thoracic vertebra, one to two pairs of gastric arteries (Fig 3/3) reached the cardiac part of the stomach (Fig 3/B1). The following major part of the alimentary canal was provided with three unpaired arteries leaving the aorta between the 8th and the 11th or 12th thoracic vertebra, the ileocolic, celiac and cranial mesenteric arteries. In one animal, the origin of the first two major arteries was different in the way that the celiac artery left the aorta cranial to the ileocolic artery.

The first artery, ileocolic artery (Fig 3/4), originating at the level of the 8th to 9th thoracic vertebra ran caudally and split into two almost equivalent vessels, of which the cranial one supplied the duodenum (Fig 3/10) and the caudal one the ileum, colon and cranial part of the rectum (Fig 3/4’). The second artery, the celiac artery (Fig 3/5), originating one length of a vertebra caudal to the first one (9th– 10th thoracic vertebra), crossed the ileocolic artery on its left side cranially. In one animal, the origin of both major arteries (Fig 3/4, 5) was different: The celiac artery left the aorta cranial to the ileocolic artery. The celiac artery supplied the major part of the stomach (Fig 3/B2−3/B4), the dorsal lobe of the pancreas (Fig 3/F), the spleen (Fig 3/G) and the beginning of the duodenum (Fig 3/C1). At first this artery gave off short gastric arteries, which ran through the dorsal mesogastrium before attaching itself to the dorsal margin of the stomach, while other short branches entered the spleen and the pancreas. The continuation of the celiac artery crossed the stomach on its right side to the ventral margin (Fig 4/12). Here, at the insertion of the ventral mesogastrium, it split into a cranial branch to both the body and the cardiac part of the stomach and a caudal smaller branch to the pyloric part and the duodenum. The origin of the third artery, the cranial mesenteric artery (Fig 3/6), was slightly more variable: It originated one to two vertebral lengths caudal to the second artery between the 10th and 12th thoracic vertebra. It crossed the caudal branch of the ileocolic artery on its right side and split into two equivalent vessels, which both ramified again to reach the small intestine, especially the jejunum, with several branches (Fig 3/11). The caudal mesenteric artery (Fig 3/7) left the aorta at the level of the 2nd to 3rd lumbar vertebra in order to supply the rectum. Before reaching the intestine, this artery bifurcated into a cranial and a caudal branch. The caudal branch ramified into relatively short branches to the rectum, whereas the cranial branch split up into some short branches to the cranial part of the rectum and a long branch, which ran further cranially to anastomose with the colic branch of the ileocolic artery. Between the caudal mesenteric artery and the final bifurcation of the aorta, two to three arteries arose from the aorta again in a segmental manner at the level of the last lumbar vertebrae (3rd to 5th). In one male animal, the last two rectal arteries seemed to be doubled, so that a total of five arteries was observed. In all animals, these arteries were unpaired, ramifying shortly before reaching the rectum (Fig 3/8). The last of these rectal arteries came from the aortic final bifurcation and reached the intestine at the junction between the rectum and cloaca. For the blood supply of the cloaca, arteries derived from the iliac and renal arteries on both sides (Fig 3/9).

When the entire dorsal mesentery—including the mesogastrium—was displayed single-planed (Fig 4), it became visible that in the mesentery all arteries of the alimentary canal crossed the respective veins on the right side—with one exception: the duodenal artery of the ileocolic artery. The majority of the veins were not parallel to the arteries of the alimentary canal (Fig 4).

The gastrointestinal veins draining blood from the stomach, as well as from the small and large intestine including the cloaca joined the portal vein (Fig 4/1), delivering the venous blood to the liver.

The veins draining the blood from the cloaca (Fig 4/2) ran in the organ wall dorsally and subsequently cranially. Finally, the cloacal veins merged within the dorsal cloacal wall and formed the caudal termination of the caudal mesenteric vein (Fig 4/3). This vein ran cranially, leaving the organ wall in the caudal region of the rectum continuing into the rectal mesentery. Positioned directly dorsal to the organ, the caudal mesenteric vein was joined by several rectal veins (Fig 4/4) from both sides of the organ wall. At the colon, the distance between the intestine and the caudal mesenteric vein became greater, the latter receiving the colic veins (Fig 4/5): the caudal colic vein from the colic isthmus, and a little further cranially, two veins from the colic ampulla, the cranial colic veins, which met the caudal mesenteric vein at one point. A small venous branch from the proximodorsal colic wall and the caecal diverticulum joined the ileal vein.

The blood drained from the ileum was collected by small veins, which merged to form one ileal vein (Fig 4/6). In five out of seven animals, the ileal vein joined the cranial mesenteric vein, in the remaining two animals the caudal mesenteric vein. Four to six veins draining the jejunum, the jejunal veins (Fig 4/7), converged to become the cranial mesenteric vein (Fig 4/8). In the direction towards the duodenum, further (one to three) smaller and shorter jejunal veins joined the cranial mesenteric vein. Subsequently, the cranial mesenteric vein met the almost equally thick caudal mesenteric vein to form the common mesenteric vein (Fig 4/9). This latter vein was relatively short, because it became the portal vein (Fig 4/1) after receiving the major gastric vein(s). At the crossing of the portal vein and the duodenum, five to seven relatively small and short duodenal venous branches directly entered the portal vein. Additionally, one or two veins from the distal duodenum joined the cranial mesenteric vein, and some small veins from the proximal duodenum joined the gastric veins.

Three major veins drained blood from different parts of the stomach, two veins from the dorsal gastric margin and one vein from the ventral margin. The left vein from the dorsal margin collected blood from venous branches of the proximal two thirds of the stomach. In five out of seven animals, this left dorsal gastric vein (Fig 4/10) merged with the cranial mesenteric vein, in two animals it joined the caudal mesenteric vein. Independent of its termination, the left dorsal gastric vein drained the spleen (Fig 4/G) and dorsal lobe of the pancreas (Fig 4/F) on its way from the stomach. The right dorsal gastric vein (Fig 4/11) was slightly smaller; it drained blood from the distal third of the stomach and continued distally to the dorsal border of the duodenum. The large ventral gastric vein (Fig 4/12) received small veins from the entire ventral margin of the stomach beginning at the cardiac part. It ran caudally and crossed the pyloric part of the stomach to the dorsal border of the duodenum. Here, it joined the right dorsal gastric vein to form one very short vein that continued into the portal vein. In two out of seven animals, the right dorsal and the ventral gastric vein joined the portal vein separately, lying close together (Fig 4/11, 12).

Histology

In general, the histology of the wall of the alimentary canal of the bearded dragon displayed four layers: mucosal tunic (Fig 5A–5D/1-1”, Fig 6A–6C/1-1’, Fig 7A–7D/1-1”), submucosal layer (Fig 5A–5D/2, Fig 6A–6C/2, Fig 7A–7D/2), muscular tunic (Fig 5A–5D/3-3’, Fig 6A–6C/3-3’, Fig 7A–7D/3-3’) and serosal tunic (Fig 5A/4, Fig 6A, 6C/4, Fig 7A–7C/4) or adventitia (Fig 7D/4’).

Fig 5. Photomicrographs of the oesophagus and stomach wall, Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps); haematoxylin and eosin staining.

Fig 5

(A) oesophagus, transverse section, bar 250 μm; inset (A’) Masson-Goldner staining, bar 50 μm; (B) cardiac part of stomach, longitudinal section, bar 250 μm; (C) body of stomach, longitudinal section, bar 250 μm; (D) pyloric part of stomach, transverse section, bar 250 μm; (E) body of stomach, longitudinal section, bar 125 μm; (F) pyloric part of stomach, transverse section, bar 125 μm. Mucous tunic consisting of epithelium (1), lamina propria (1‘) and muscular layer (1”); submucosal layer (2); muscular tunic consisting of an inner circular stratum (3) and an outer longitudinal stratum (3’); serosal tunic (4) or adventitia (4’). The lamina propria (1’) contains serous glands (a) in the cardiac part (B) of the stomach; heterocrine glands (b) consisting of chief cells (exocrinocytus principalis; b1) and acidophilic parietal cells (exocrinocytus parietalis; b2) in the body (C, E); and mucous glands (c) in the pyloric part (D, F). The epithelium (1) of the oesophagus (A’) shows a brush border (white arrowhead) and many goblet cells (arrows). The lamina propria (1’) and the muscular layer (1”) of the oesophagus (A, A’) contain black pigments (*). E, F: The epithelial apical cytoplasm (1, black arrowhead) of the stomach appears eosinophilic.

Fig 6. Photomicrographs of the wall of the small intestine, Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps), transverse sections.

Fig 6

(A) duodenum, haematoxylin and eosin staining, bar 250 μm; (B) jejunum, Masson-Goldner staining, bar 250 μm; (C) ileum, haematoxylin and eosin staining, bar 250 μm; (D) duodenum, Masson-Goldner staining, bar 62.5 μm. Mucous tunic consisting of epithelium (1) interspersed with goblet cells (arrows) and lamina propria (1‘) with large central vessel (d); submucosal layer (2); muscular tunic consisting of an inner circular stratum (3) and an outer longitudinal stratum (3’); serosal tunic (4); attachment of mesentery (5). D: The epithelium (1) shows a brush border (white arrowhead). Smooth muscle cells (*) are located near the wall of the central vessel (d) in the lamina propria (1’).

Fig 7. Photomicrographs of the wall of the large intestine, Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps), haematoxylin and eosin staining.

Fig 7

(A) colic ampulla, bar 250 μm; (B) colic isthmus, bar 250 μm; (C) rectum, bar 250 μm; (D) cloaca, bar 125 μm; (E) colic ampulla; (F) cloaca, bar 125 μm. Mucous tunic consisting of epithelium (1) interspersed with goblet cells (arrows), lamina propria (1‘) and muscular layer (1”); submucosal layer (2); muscular tunic consisting of an inner circular stratum (3) and an outer longitudinal stratum (3’); serosal tunic (4). E, F: The epithelium (1) shows a brush border (white arrowhead).

The oesophagus showed a pseudostratified or bilayered columnar epithelium (Fig 5A/1) with numerous goblet cells (Fig 5A/arrows). A brush border (Fig 5A’/white arrowhead) on the apical surface of the epithelial cells indicated the presence of microvilli. The lamina propria (Fig 5A/1’) contained some mucous glands near the orifice of the stomach, and was underlaid with a longitudinal layer of the lamina muscularis (Fig 5A/1”). Both laminae showed black pigments (Fig 5A/*), the abundance of which decreased caudally. The degree of decrease was variable between individuals. The submucosal layer (Fig 5A/2) was composed of fine loose collagenous connective tissue containing blood vessels. The muscular tunic had an inner circular layer (Fig 5A/3) and an outer longitudinal layer (Fig 5A/3’).

The stomach had a simple columnar epithelium (Fig 5B–5D/1). The surface showed areolae and foveolae. The basophile nuclei were positioned centrally, thus allowing the eosinophilic apical cytoplasm (Fig 5E–5F/black arrowhead) to be discerned from the basal cytoplasm, which was stained light-pink. In the cranial part of the stomach, the lamina propria (Fig 5B/1’) contained serous glands (Fig 5B/a). At the body of the stomach, heterocrine gastric glands (Fig 5C/b) were abundant, which were composed of slightly basophilic chief cells (exocrinocytus principalis; Fig 5C/b1) and acidophilic parietal cells (exocrinocytus parietalis; Fig 5C/b2). Mucous glands (Fig 5D/c) were present in the distal, pyloric part of the stomach. The distinctly thick lamina muscularis of the mucosa had two layers (Fig 5B–5D/1”), an inner circular and an outer longitudinal layer. The submucosal layer consisted of delicate loose collagenous connective tissue with small arteries and veins (Fig 5B–5D/2). The muscular tunic was strong in the stomach and consisted of two layers of smooth muscle cells, an inner circular and an outer longitudinal stratum (Fig 5B-C/3-3’) in the proximal part. In the middle and distal parts, it had only a circular stratum (Fig 5C/3), the thickness of which increased remarkably at the distal part. The serosal tunic had a simple squamous epithelium with a faint lamina propria (Fig 5B/4), which was remarkably thicker in the middle and distal parts of the stomach. A clear border to a subserosal layer was not visible.

The intestine had a simple columnar epithelium (Figs 6A–6C/1, 5A–5D/1), which was interspersed with goblet cells (Figs 6A–6C/arrows, 5A-D/arrows), showing strong basophilic staining. The cytoplasm of the enterocytes was slightly acidophilic, and the nucleus was located in the basal half of the cells. The visibility of a brush border (Fig 6D/white arrowhead, Fig 7E and 7F/white arrowhead) indicated the presence of microvilli on the apical cell surface.

The small intestine (Fig 6A–6C) showed a large number of longitudinal mucosal folds decreasing distally in height and number. These folds contained a very large central vessel (Fig 6A–6C/d), which was surrounded by the lamina propria of the mucosa (Fig 6A–6C/1’). At the bases of the mucosal folds, the wall of these central vessels contained smooth muscle cells (Fig 6A–6C/*). The mucosa lacked a lamina muscularis and was separated from the muscular tunic only by a thin submucosal layer (Fig 6A–6C/2). The muscular tunic was comparatively thin, but consisted of two layers, an inner circular and an outer longitudinal stratum (Fig 6A–6C/3-3’). The serosal tunic was a simple squamous epithelium with a faint lamina propria (Fig 6A/4). However, the epithelial cells showed a cuboidal shape (Fig 6C/4) in some specimens.

The large intestine showed only a few mucosal folds in the colic ampulla (Fig 7A), while folds were more frequent (Fig 7B) in the colic isthmus. In the rectum and in the cloaca, distinct folds were present (Fig 7C and 7D). In comparison to the small intestine, all four parts of the large intestine lacked the large central vessel within the mucosal folds, but the mucosa had a clear, single-layered lamina muscularis (Fig 7A-7D/1”). This smooth muscle layer was divided from the muscular tunic by an obvious submucosal layer (Fig 7A-7D/2). The muscular tunic consisted of two strata: a circular and longitudinal one (Fig 7A–7D/3-3’). These two strata were almost equally thick at the colic ampulla, while the thickness of the inner circular stratum increased remarkably at the colic isthmus, but was thinner again at the rectum. At the cloaca, the inner muscular stratum was relatively thin, but was arranged in loops. In comparison to the colon and rectum, the cloaca was no longer coated by a serosal tunic (Fig 7A–7C/4), but was surrounded by adventitia and perineal muscles.

Discussion

The objective of the present study was to suggest a nomenclature for the different parts of the alimentary canal in bearded dragons, which is easily understandable and zoologically correct. As most veterinarian practitioners mainly treat mammals and the anatomical education at veterinarian schools is primarily based on domestic mammals, the findings of the present study were set in relation not only to other reptiles, but also to mammalian conditions. To meet this, the anatomical examination included the macroscopic anatomy, the topography of the alimentary canal itself and the neighbouring organs, as well as the blood vessel supply and the histology of the canal’s wall. These morphological features allow the clear differentiation of the specific parts of the alimentary canal in mammals. However, there are distinct characteristics in the examined lizard species, which differ remarkably from the anatomy of mammals, but did in fact allow a clear distinction as well.

In bearded dragons, the oesophagus begins at the cranial aperture of the thoracic cavity. The transition from the pharynx to the oesophagus is perceptible because of the reduction in the lumen to a muscular tube and the loss of the pharyngeal dark pigmentation. This is true for many reptilian species [10]. Generally, the oesophagus is the organ that connects the pharynx to the stomach in vertebrates; it represents a muscular tube for the transport of food to the stomach [1113]. In contrast to the bearded dragon, the mammalian oesophagus begins at the cranial end of the neck, passing along most of the neck and the entire length of the thoracic cavity [1416]. The observed difference is due to the extremely short neck in the bearded dragon compared to the mammalian neck. In bearded dragons, the oesophageal epithelium is formed by a bilayered columnar epithelium with goblet cells. This feature is seen in most reptilian species [10], thus being in contrast to the stratified squamous epithelium of the mammalian oesophagus [1416].

The macroscopic beginning of the stomach is unclear in bearded dragons because a diaphragm is missing and the diameter of the lumen only increases gradually. In contrast, the increase in the lumen of the mammalian stomach compared to that of the oesophagus is eminent and the cardia defines a clear border [14, 15]. In mammals, the cardiac notch separates the cardia from the blind-ending, dorsally bulging fundus on the left [15]. As this bulging part of the stomach is missing in bearded dragons, the cardiac part merges directly into the major part, the body of the stomach. However, in zoological textbooks [1113] this major part of the stomach in amniotes is termed “fundus”. In recent publications, the term “fundus” is used in one case for the major part of the stomach [3], and in another for the part caudal to the cardia [5]. Such inconsistencies may lead to misunderstandings. The terms “cardiac part” or “pars cardiaca” for the part of the stomach caudal to the cardia and “body of the stomach” or “corpus ventriculi” for the major part of the stomach, which extends until its turn to the right, are unequivocal. For the distal part of the stomach, the term “pyloric portion” [3], “pyloric antrum” [5] or “pyloric region” [12] can be found in literature. Thus, the terms are nearly the same as in textbooks on mammalian anatomy, in which the distal part of the stomach is called the pyloric part [14, 15] or pars pylorica [7, 16]. In some publications, the stomach is divided into descending, transverse and ascending parts in bearded dragons and other lizards [9, 17]. This does not apply to the topography of the stomach in live bearded dragons, which is observed by radiographic studies [5, 6, 18]. Intra vitam, in this lizard species, the stomach runs only caudally, at first slightly to the left and then after turning, to the right. Thus, the terms “descending”,”transverse” and”ascending” may display the gastric topography in a specific reptile species, but are definitely not appropriate for bearded dragons.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the present study describes the vascularisation of the alimentary canal of bearded dragons for the first time. In bearded dragons, the pattern of arterial blood supply changes between the cardiac part and the body of the stomach. The cardiac part of the stomach is provided with pairs of segmental arteries, which is the same pattern of blood supply as at the oesophagus. Thus, this feature is not valid as an indication of the location of the cardia. The major gastric arterial blood supply is accomplished by branches of the celiac artery, which is normally the second major artery leaving the aorta for the abdominal organs. Only in one examined bearded dragon was the celiac artery the first abdominal artery arising from the aorta, so that the order of aortic arteries in this specific animal more closely resembled that of mammals [14, 15]. In contrast to the arteries, the gastric veins drain the entire stomach to the portal vein, reaching even the cardiac part, but not the oesophagus. Thus, they can serve as an indication of the cranial border of the stomach.

In the bearded dragon, the microscopic structure of the epithelium changes gradually from the oesophagus to the stomach. The pseudostratified epithelium with goblet cells of the oesophagus with a moderate lamina propria is replaced by a simple columnar epithelium and a high lamina propria containing a great quantity of glands. In contrast to bearded dragons, a sudden change from oesophageal epithelium to gastric epithelium appears in humans and other mammals [19], and a strong caudal oesophageal [20] or cardiac musculature [16] prevents an oesophageal reflux of gastric content. However, this strong musculature is missing in the cardiac part of bearded dragons. This might explain why the oesophageal epithelium was often destroyed in the histologic specimens taken for the present study. The types of glands, which were found in the stomach of bearded dragons, are serous glands in the cardiac part, gastric glands in the body of the stomach and mucous glands in the pyloric part. A subdivision into these three glandular zones can also be observed in mammals [19, 21].

In contrast to the cardia, the pylorus is clearly defined by strong palpable musculature in bearded dragons. The pylorus points to the right side of the body cavity. Both features are similar to those of mammals [1416].

In bearded dragons, the small intestine has a significantly smaller lumen than the large intestine, with the result that in this lizard species, the transition between both parts of the intestine is clearly defined as is true for most reptile [22] and mammalian species [1113].

To divide the small intestine of bearded dragons into the three parts known in mammals [7, 1416], several criteria have to be used. One criterion was the size of the intestinal lumen, which decreases from the duodenum towards the ileum. This is in accordance with radiographic results after administering a contrast medium in live bearded dragons [5]. However, different intestinal content influences the width of the lumen in cadaveric specimens. Thus, the narrowing of the lumen was not visible in all bearded dragons examined in the present study.

A further criterion is the opening of the bile duct into the cranial part of the small intestine, which marks this part as the duodenum. This feature can be observed in reptiles as well as in mammals [1113].

The decisive criterion for the subdivision of the small intestine in bearded dragons is actually the blood supply. In bearded dragons, two major arteries arise close to the celiac artery as first and third ventral artery from the aorta and supply the intestine except its final caudal part. This is similar to many other reptile species, in which these two arteries were named the coecalic and the superior mesenteric artery [22, 23]. All three ventral arteries are formed by splitting one common celiac-mesenteric artery, and their order occurs due to twisting of the resulting arteries [22, 23]. The first artery was termed the coecalic artery [22, 23], referring to the old name of the caecum. This artery actually supplies the ileum, the caecum and the colon. Therefore, the term “ileocolic artery”, which is used in mammalian anatomical nomenclature, would display the real area of blood supply better. However, in the bearded dragon, this artery splits into two arteries, one leading to the ileum, caecum and colon, like in other reptiles, and the other to the duodenum. This splitting of the “coecalic artery” has been found in several other agamid lizards such as the Roughtail Rock Agama (Stellagama stellio, LINNAEUS, 1758) or the Dessert Agama (Trapelus mutabilis, MERREM, 1820), and can be seen in some gecko species such as the Sinai Fan-fingered Gecko (Ptyodactylus guttatus, HEYDEN 1827) and in some chameleon species such as the Graceful Chameleon (Chamaeleo gracilis, HALLOWELL, 1844), too [22]. Thus, even the term “ileocolic artery” is incomplete and “duodeno” should be added for bearded dragons. However, we suggest to keep using “ileocolic artery”, as this term is appropriate for almost all reptilian species and not only for a few. Nevertheless, this particular arterial branch of the ileocolic artery to the duodenum enables a clear distinction between the duodenum and the remaining small intestine in bearded dragons. For the ileum, it is not the arterial supply, but the venous drainage, which divides it from the remaining small intestine. The ileal vein branches off the caudal mesenteric vein to drain the ileum. Unfortunately, in literature the venous distribution pattern in reptiles is not described in detail. Previous studies focused on the development and topography of the main venous stems [23, 24]. For the gastrointestinal tract, the main vein is the portal vein, which runs to the liver, collecting the venous blood from the common mesenteric vein. This is true not only for reptiles [23, 24], but also for birds [25, 26] and mammals [7, 1416].

An additional criterion for differentiation could be the height of the mucosal folds of the small intestine, which decreases caudally. However, as it decreases continuously, it cannot serve as a distinct border between the different parts. The mucosal folds of the small intestine seen in bearded dragons are similar to those of several other lizard and reptile species [27]. On the contrary, the mammalian small intestine is equipped with intestinal villi [7, 1416]. Histologic images of the study at hand reveal the presence of large vessels within the mucosal folds and at the base of the mucosal folds of the bearded dragon. This is in accordance with investigations concerning the lymphatic system in reptiles, which showed that the intestine of reptiles normally contains three nets of lymphatic vessels: subserous muscular, submucosal and mucosal ones [28]. In gecko and lacerta species, the mucosal network consists of longitudinal lymphatic vessels in the mucosal folds. The submucosal network is formed by longitudinal vessels, which are connected by large transverse anastomoses. In contrast to the small intestine, the principal lymphatic net of the large intestine lies in the submucosa where large vessels are arranged in large meshes [28]. These differences of the lymphatic networks might explain the observation that the wall of the small intestine, despite its thinness, shows up to five layers in the ultrasound image, while the layers of the wall of the large intestine cannot be differentiated in bearded dragons [4].

The intestinal epithelium of bearded dragons and other reptiles as well as that of mammals is similar, as all have columnar epithelial cells with microvilli interspersed with goblet cells [19, 21, 29].

A circular mucosal fold indicates the border between the small and large intestine in the bearded dragon. In amniotes, the ileocaecal valve is found in this specific location [11, 12]. However, the term is misleading as it connects the ileum with the colon [11, 12]. Due to this inconsistency, the term “ileocolic valve” is applied in specific descriptions of reptile anatomy [17, 27, 28]. The respective intestinal opening in domestic mammals is defined to be the ileal ostium/orifice [7, 1416]. Some recent studies refer to the first part of the large intestine as caecum in bearded dragons [3, 5] despite the fact that the caecum is defined as a diverticulum of the colon [12]. The caecum is positioned dorsally to the colon in reptiles [12] and it is therefore named “caecum dorsale” [30]. This is in accordance with the findings in most bearded dragons investigated for the present study, which displayed a small dorsal diverticulum protruding from the first part of the large intestine. This allows the conclusion that the diverticulum is the small, blind-ending caecum and the actual first part of the large intestine is the colon. As the first colic part is dilated to a nearly spherical shape in bearded dragons, the term “colic ampulla” was chosen in the present study. This term is also used for the extended final part of the equine ascending colon [7, 14, 16]. The following narrow segment separates the colic ampulla from the widened final part of the large intestine in bearded dragons. This narrow segment was termed the “colic isthmus” in the study at hand. As the final part of the intestine terminating in the cloaca is straight, the term “rectum” was chosen. This term is commonly used for the last straight part of the large intestine in birds [8, 31] and mammals [7, 1416]. However, in zoological textbooks [1113] and publications on reptiles [17, 27, 29], the colon is not subdivided into colon and rectum.

Looking at the arterial supply of the large intestine in bearded dragons, cranial arteries from the ileocolic artery and caudal arteries, namely the caudal mesenteric and the rectal arteries, are visible. The same is the case in birds and mammals with the limitation that the ileocolic (avian: ileocaecal) artery arises from the cranial mesenteric artery and the rectal arteries arise from the caudal mesenteric artery in birds [25, 26] and mammals [7, 1416]. Additionally, in the examined bearded dragons, the ramification of the caudal mesenteric artery into a cranial and a caudal branch is similar to the distribution pattern in birds [25, 26] and mammals [7, 1416]. In birds, the two branches are named “cranial branch” and “caudal branch” [25, 26], while in mammals the respective terms are “left colic artery” and “cranial rectal artery” [7, 1416]. In the bearded dragon, two to three segmental arteries branch off the aorta caudal to the caudal mesenteric artery to supply the final part of the intestine. In the present study, these arteries were termed “rectal arteries”, as they reach the intestine cranially to and directly at the border to the cloaca. This border is marked by at least one circular mucosal fold, and the cloaca is supplied by paired arteries arising from the iliac and renal arteries. These findings support the suggestion to name the final part of the large intestine “rectum”.

The surface structure of the large intestine in bearded dragons, showing small protrusions all over its surface, is also seen in other reptile species. In the Jackson’s chameleon (Chamaeleon jacksonii, BOULENGER 1896) villus-like projections can be found, and in some agamid and spiny-tailed lizards (Uromastyx species) as well as in some skinks (Eumeces species), a pebbled or papillose appearance of the luminal surface of the entire colon is observed [27]. This macroscopic finding is confirmed by histologic results in the present study, where small mucosal elevations are visible in longitudinal as well as in transverse sections, which proves that they cannot be folds. Apart from this, the epithelium remains similar to that of the small intestine, a feature that has been observed in different reptilian species previously [29]. In contrast, the mammalian large intestine lacks villous structures, and shows intestinal crypts [19, 21, 32]. The fact that such crypts cannot be found in bearded dragons corresponds to histologic findings in other reptiles [29].

In conclusion, the different parts of the alimentary canal of the inland bearded dragon display remarkable differences concerning the topography, anatomy and histology of the organ wall as well as vascular supply compared to mammals. Nevertheless, there are sufficient similarities to identify homologous parts and structures, suggesting a definite and understandable nomenclature for the parts of the alimentary canal and the supplying blood vessels in bearded dragons.

In the coelom of the bearded dragon, the alimentary canal begins with the oesophagus supplied by paired oesophageal arteries. The following stomach is subdivided into a cardiac part, a body and a pyloric part, characterised by their topography and type of glands, and supplied by paired short gastric arteries and branches of the celiac artery. Subsequently, the small intestine can be differentiated into a duodenum, a jejunum and an ileum. The jejunum is supplied by branches of the cranial mesenteric artery, while the duodenum and the ileum receive branches of the ileocolic artery. For the special characteristics of the large intestine in bearded dragons, the terms colic ampulla and colic isthmus were chosen; the small dorsal diverticulum of the colon is the caecum and the caudal continuation the rectum. Their arterial branches arise from the ileocolic artery, the caudal mesenteric artery and rectal arteries. The venous drainage is implemented by the portal vein, which receives a gastric vein, several small duodenal veins and a common mesenteric vein, into which a cranial and caudal mesenteric vein join.

Acknowledgments

The technical assistance of Doris Voigtländer and Marion Langeheine preparing the specimens histologically is gratefully acknowledged. We most gratefully acknowledge the expert contribution of our native speaker, Ms. Frances Sherwood‐Brock, who revised the English manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This publication was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (https://www.dfg.de) and University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (https://www.tiho-hannover.de) within the funding programme Open Access Publishing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Johnson JD. What veterinarians need to know about bearded dragons. Exotic DVM. 2006;8: 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sinn AD. Pathologie der Reptilien—eine retrospektive Studie. Thesis (Dr. med. vet.). Ludwig Maximillian University Munich. 2004. Available from: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1849/1/Sinn_Anje.pdf
  • 3.Bucy DS, Guzman DS, Zwingenberger AL. Ultrasonographic anatomy of bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;246: 868–876. 10.2460/javma.246.8.868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wachsmann S. Ultraschalluntersuchungen bei Bartagamen (Pogona vitticeps) unter Berücksichtigung klinischer, röntgenologischer und labordiagnostischer Parameter. Thesis (Dr. vet. med.). School of Veterinary Medicine Hannover. 2010. Available from: https://elib.tiho-hannover.de/dissertations/wachsmanns_ss10
  • 5.Grosset C, Daniaux L, Guzman DS, Weber ES 3rd, Zwingenberger A, Paul-Murphy J. Radiographic anatomy and barium sulfate contrast transit time of the gastrointestinal tract of bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014;55: 241–250. 10.1111/vru.12128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mathes KA, Radelof K, Engelke E, Rohn K, Pfarrer C, Fehr M. Specific anatomy and radiographic illustration of the digestive tract and transit time of two orally administered contrast media in Inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0221050 10.1371/journal.pone.0221050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. 6th ed Hanover, Ghent, Columbia (MO), Rio de Janeiro: World Association of Veterinary Anatomists; 2017. [cited 2019 February 01]. Available from: http://www.wava-amav.org/downloads/nav_6_2017.zip. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McLelland J. Apparatus digestorius In: Baumel JJ, editor. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. 2nd ed Cambridge (MA): Nuttall Ornithological Club; 1993. pp. 301–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banzato T, Selleri P, Veladiano IA, Zotti A. Comparative evaluation of the cadaveric and computed tomographic features of the coelomic cavity in the green iguana (Iguana iguana), black and white tegu (Tupinambis merianae) and bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps). Anat Histol Embryol. 2013;42: 453–460. 10.1111/ahe.12037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pernkopf E, Lehner J. Vergleichende Beschreibungen des Vorderdarms bei den einzelnen Klassen der Cranioten In: Bolk L, Göppert E, Kallius E, Lubosch W, editors. Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Vol 3 Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1937. pp. 349–474. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moeller H. Cladus Vertebrata In: Siewing R, editor. Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Vol 2: Systematik. 3rd ed Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer; 1985. pp. 411–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Romer AS, Parsons TS. Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. 5th ed Hamburg: Paul Parey; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Remane A, Storch V, Welsch U. Systematische Zoologie. 3rd ed Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sisson S. Digestive System In: Getty R, editor. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Vol 1 5th ed Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 1975. pp. 104–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Evans HE, Christensen GC. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 2nd ed Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vollmerhaus B, Roos H. Speiseröhre, Magen, Darm, Darmanhangsdrüsen In: Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, editors. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere. Vol 2 9th ed Stuttgart: Parey; 2004. pp. 103–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith D, Dobson H, Spence E. Gastrointestinal studies in the green iguana: technique and reference values. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2001;42: 515–20. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2001.tb00979.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Radelof K. Der Gastrointestinaltrakt der Bartagame (Pogona vitticeps): Anatomische Betrachtungen und gastrointestinale Passagezeit von zwei verschiedenen Kontrastmitteln. Gießen: VVB Laufersweiler; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Welsch U. Lehrbuch Histologie. 3rd ed Munich: Elsevier; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lippert H. Lehrbuch Anatomie. 5th ed Munich, Jena: Urban and Fischer; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liebich H-G. Funktionelle Histologie der Haussäugetiere. 3rd ed Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hochstetter F. Über die Arterien des Darmkanals der Saurier. Gegenbaurs morphologisches Jahrbuch. 1898;26: 213–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hertwig O. Handbuch der vergleichenden und experimentellen Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere. Jena: Gustav Fischer; 1906. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gegenbaur C. Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere. Leipzig: Engelmann; 1901. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Waibl H, Sinowatz F. Kreislaufapparat und Lymphatisches System In: Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, editors. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere. Vol 5 2nd ed Berlin: Paul Parey; 1992. pp. 283–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baumel JJ. Systema cardiovasculare In: Baumel JJ, editor. Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. 2nd ed Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club; 1993. pp. 407–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parsons TS, Cameron JE. Internal Relief of the Digestive Tract In: Gans C, Parsons TS, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Vol 6 London, New York: Academic Press; 1977. pp. 159–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ottaviani G, Tazzi A. The Lymphatic System In: Gans C, Parsons TS, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Vol 6 London: Academic Press; 1977. pp. 315–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Luppa H. Histology of the Digestive Tract In: Gans C, Parsons TS, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Vol 6 London: Academic Press; 1977. pp. 225–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jacobshagen E. Mittel- und Enddarm (Rumpfdarm) In: Bolk L, Göppert E, Kallius E, Lubosch W, editors. Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Vol 3 Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1937. pp. 563–721. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vollmerhaus B, Sinowatz F. Verdauungsapparat In: Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, editors. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere. Vol 5 2nd ed Berlin: Paul Parey; 1992. pp. 176–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.International Committee on Veterinary Histological Nomenclature. Nomina Histologica Veterinaria. 1st ed Leipzig Bern, Ghent Rio-de-Janeiro: World Association of Veterinary Anatomists; 2017. [cited 2019 February 01]. Available from: http://www.wava-amav.org/downloads/NHV_2017.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jack Kottwitz

13 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-31153

Gross anatomy, histology and blood vessel topography of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Engelke,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Apr 27 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jack Kottwitz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This was a well written manuscript. The authors have done a very good job. . I have no comments beyond what Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 noted in their respective reviews.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please clarify the source of the animal cadavers used in this study. If they were pets, please state whether you received permission from the owners. Please also provide a reference for the source if relevant.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This publication was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation within the funding programme Open Access Publishing."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

4. Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors are to be commended for producing a well illustrated and well organized anatomical paper. The fact that multiple individual individuals of both sexes were used and that individual variations were noted is also to be commended. This paper contributes significant information about the anatomy of the blood supply in bearded dragons. Since these are some of the most common lizards in the captivity, this information is very useful. I have attached a copy of the manuscript with a few comments, including a few editorial suggestions and possible extra figures to include. I have also suggested a rewrite of the paragraphs describing veins to show their inherent difference from arteries. However, my overall impression is that this paper is well researched, well annotated and well written with little need for revision.

Reviewer #2: Line 108. Change the label of the testicle in the gross image. It is labeled “K”. I would switch the liver and testicle letters. Many practitioners easily forget that the kidneys in bearded dragons are within the pelvis. If they glance at the image, they will immediately think K=Kidney.

Line 139: If there are only two lobes of the pancreas, this should be noted.

Line 142: Is the spleen at the cranial end of the dorsal or ventral pancreatic lobe.

Line 150 to 157 and 167. Are there approximate measurements to these ‘larger, smaller, longer’ descriptions? I realize this might not be possible given the range in size of the females. The male specimens seem to be approximately the same size. Or maybe there is some way to give the reader a guesstimate: ‘the jejunum was about twice as long as the duodenum’. ‘The duodenum is ¼ larger in diameter than the jejunum.’ You do provide a measurement for the caecal diverticulum.

260 to 261: I want to make sure I understood this….the ‘smaller veins from the’ or the ‘further large vein left’ of the ‘cranial mesenteric vein’ drains the pancreas (both lobes?) and the spleen? I am unclear about ‘this branch’ arose form the caudal mesenteric vein (in two out of seven animals).

327 and 563: Ventriculus? Do bearded dragons have a ventriculus? Is there a reference for this? I thought this was only in crocodiles and alligators.

I really like the images!

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ray Wilhite

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-19-31153_Engelke, et al wilhite comments.pdf

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0234736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234736.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Apr 2020

Response to reviewers

Manuscript ID PONE-D-19-31153:

"Gross anatomy, histology and blood vessel topography of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps)"

We would like to thank the reviewers for their thorough proof-reading of the manuscript and their thoughtful comments. We have considered each comment carefully and revised our manuscript to address the issues raised.

(The line numbers in our answers refer to the revised manuscript with track changes.)

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Journal Requirements:

Requirement #1.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

>>We inserted continuous line numbers.

First page: We removed the “and” between the second last and last author, line 8. as the template for the first page does not show it.

File naming: We changed the captions of the figures composed of several images (Figs 2, 5, 6, 7) by removing the letters from the figure labels in the caption, so that the figure file names and the figure label in the caption are the same now. Fig 2: page 8, line 185; Fig 5: page 14, line 339; Fig 6: page 15, line 357; Fig 7: page 15, line 369.

Requirement #2.

Please clarify the source of the animal cadavers used in this study. If they were pets, please state whether you received permission from the owners. Please also provide a reference for the source if relevant.

>>We inserted the information that we asked the owners of the pets for permission into the Material and method section of the manuscript, page 4, lines 72-73.

Requirement #3.

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript…

>>We removed the funding information from the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript, page 27, lines 641-643.

… and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement.

>>Please remove "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work." from the Funding Statement section and insert instead " This publication was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (https://www.dfg.de) and University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (https://www.tiho-hannover.de) within the funding programme Open Access Publishing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Requirement #4.

Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript.

>>We inserted our ethics statement into the Material and methods section of our manuscript, page 5, lines 99-103.

Reviewer #1:

Attached copy of the manuscript with comments

Comments:

Comment #1

Page 3, line 50: Does this statistic apply to all lizards or just bearded dragons?

>>The statistic applies to all examined lizards in the respective study [2].

Comment #2

Page 5, line 110: beautiful specimen preparations and i like the intuitive labels for the arteries.

>>Thank you! We enjoyed reading this comment!

Comment #3

Page 5, line 115: I would love to see a figure showing this.

>>As we did not receive an answer to our question to the editor about the permission to add figures until 24. April 2020, we did not add macroscopic figures.

Comment #4

Page 5, line 117: I think you mean "L", correct?

>>“L” is correct, we changed the letter, page 6, line 124.

Comment #5

Page 6, line 131: I would suggest using "Where" instead of "When"

>>We followed the suggestion of the reviewer and inserted “Where” instead of “When”, page 6, line 138.

Comment #6

Page 6, lines 133-136: I would love to see a photo of this included.

>>As we did not receive an answer to our question to the editor about the permission to add figures until 24. April 2020, we did not add macroscopic figures.

Comment #7

Page 8, lines 172-173: It would be good to have a figure showing the parts of the cloaca. I have seen very few good dissection images of the three parts.

>>As we did not receive an answer to our question to the editor about the permission to add figures until 24. April 2020, we did not add macroscopic figures.

Comment #8

Page 8, line 185: add "of stomach"

>>Following the Reviewer’s suggestion, we added “of stomach”, page 8, line 193.

Comment #9

Page 9, line 220: remove comma

>>We followed the suggestion of Reviewer 1, page 10, line 228.

Comment #10

Page 11, lines 249-270: I would strongly suggest rewriting this section on veins to reflect the fact that veins are named where they drain a target organ and then come together to form larger veins instead of branching to supply individual organs as arteries do. We try to stress this difference to the students and it would be good to see it emphasized in the literature.

>>According to the Reviewer’s suggestion, we removed the original text and re-wrote the description of the veins in the order of the blood flow, pages 11-13.

While writing the new text, we recognized that the dorsal gastric veins would be described in a better way, when we add “dorsal” to their term. Therefore, we added “dorsal” to the labelling of these veins in Fig 4, page 14, 327-328.

Comment #11

Page 13, line 311-316: The histology figures are excellent. I would also like to see some higher res images of the smaller individual cells and structures discussed in the text if possible as well. I understand if this is not possible due to figure constraints, however.

>>Following the suggestion of the Reviewer, we inserted one higher-resolution image to Fig 6 and two higher-resolution images to Figs 5 and 7, respectively. We adapted the figure captions of the Figs 5, 6 and 7 to the changes made, pages 14-16. The figure references in the text were also adapted, page 16, line 379-390.

Inserting the higher-resolution images, we recognized that the clearly visible brush border of the oesophagus was not yet mentioned in the manuscript. Thus, we inserted a sentence describing the oesophageal brush border, page 16, lines 380-381.

Comment #12 and #13

Page 14, lines 328-329: delete add "to be discerned" here

>>We changed the sentence in the suggested manner, page 16, lines 389-390.

Comment #14

Page 14, line 347-348: Figure?

>>We added an indication of the brush border to Fig 6D, Fig 7E-F and a figure reference to the text, page 17, line 408-409.

Comment #15

Page 15, line 355: Should there be a figure reference here? Fig 6A-C/4-4' perhaps?

>>The Reviewer is right; there should have been a figure reference. We inserted the respective reference, page 17, lines 416-417.

Comment #16

Page 16, line 383: change to "as well"

>>We changed the wording in the suggested manner, page 18, line 444.

Comment #17

Page 22, line 544: add "also" here

>>We changed the wording in the suggested manner, page 24, line 605.

Reviewer #2:

Comment #1

Line 108. Change the label of the testicle in the gross image. It is labeled “K”. I would switch the liver and testicle letters. Many practitioners easily forget that the kidneys in bearded dragons are within the pelvis. If they glance at the image, they will immediately think K=Kidney.

>>We followed the suggestion of the reviewer and switched the letters indicating liver and testicle in Figure 1, the text (page 6, line 125) and the figure caption (page 5, line 115).

Comment #2

Line 139: If there are only two lobes of the pancreas, this should be noted.

>>There is also a pancreatic body between the two lobes. We inserted a sentence explaining this fact, page 7, lines 148-150.

Comment #3

Line 142: Is the spleen at the cranial end of the dorsal or ventral pancreatic lobe.

>>The spleen is located at the dorsal lobe of the pancreas. We added this detail to the respective sentence, page 7, lines 150-151.

Comment #4

Line 150 to 157 and 167. Are there approximate measurements to these ‘larger, smaller, longer’ descriptions? I realize this might not be possible given the range in size of the females. The male specimens seem to be approximately the same size. Or maybe there is some way to give the reader a guesstimate: ‘the jejunum was about twice as long as the duodenum’. ‘The duodenum is ¼ larger in diameter than the jejunum.’ You do provide a measurement for the caecal diverticulum.

>>Exact measurements of the specific sections of the alimentary canal were taken and have already been published by our work group in PLOS ONE [6]. To give the reader the information where to find the measurement values, we added an indication with the reference to Material and methods, page 4, lines 88-89.

Comment #5

260 to 261: I want to make sure I understood this….the ‘smaller veins from the’ or the ‘further large vein left’ of the ‘cranial mesenteric vein’ drains the pancreas (both lobes?) and the spleen? I am unclear about ‘this branch’ arose form the caudal mesenteric vein (in two out of seven animals).

>>We re-wrote the chapter about the veins according the suggestion of reviewer 1. In doing so, we explained that it is the left dorsal gastric vein draining the pancreas and spleen, page 13, lines 309-311.

We added “the dorsal lobe of” to “the pancreas”. page 13, line 310

Comment #6

327 and 563: Ventriculus? Do bearded dragons have a ventriculus? Is there a reference for this? I thought this was only in crocodiles and alligators.

>>Checking the text of our manuscript, we became aware of the fact that we did not use any other Latin term for other organs or stuctures. Thus, we removed the Latin term “ventriculus” from the text, page 16, line 388 and page 25, line 625.

The term “ventriculus” is the Latin anatomic term for the single-chambered stomach in veterinary medicine [7]. In birds and crocodiles/alligators, there is an additional gastric chamber, the proventriculus, which is located cranially to the “main” stomach, the ventriculus. In birds, the proventriculus is also called glandular stomach, and the ventriculus is also known as muscular stomach or gizzard.

Again, the authors are grateful for the very helpful editorial suggestions and improving remarks.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jack Kottwitz

2 Jun 2020

Gross anatomy, histology and blood vessel topography of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps)

PONE-D-19-31153R1

Dear Dr. Engelke,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Jack Kottwitz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I very much appreciate the author's efforts at addressing the reviewer comments. The vein section, in particular, is greatly improved by the resdescription.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ray Wilhite

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Jack Kottwitz

8 Jun 2020

PONE-D-19-31153R1

Gross anatomy, histology and blood vessel topography of the alimentary canal of the Inland Bearded Dragon (Pogona vitticeps)

Dear Dr. Engelke:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jack Kottwitz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-19-31153_Engelke, et al wilhite comments.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES