Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0235125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235125

Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation

Tessa M Page 1, Guillermo Diaz-Pulido 1,*
Editor: Bayden D Russell2
PMCID: PMC7310705  PMID: 32574214

Abstract

Crustose coralline algae (CCA) are vital to coral reefs worldwide, providing structural integrity and inducing the settlement of important invertebrate larvae. CCA are known to be impacted by changes in their environment, both during early development and adulthood. However, long-term studies on either life history stage are lacking in the literature, therefore not allowing time to explore the acclimatory or potential adaptive responses of CCA to future global change scenarios. Here, we exposed a widely distributed, slow growing, species of CCA, Sporolithon cf. durum, to elevated temperature and pCO2 for five months and their first set of offspring (F1) for eleven weeks. Survival, reproductive output, and metabolic rate were measured in adult S. cf. durum, and survival and growth were measured in the F1 generation. Adult S. cf. durum experienced 0% mortality across treatments and reduced their O2 production after five months exposure to global stressors, indicating a possible expression of plasticity. In contrast, the combined stressors of elevated temperature and pCO2 resulted in 50% higher mortality and 61% lower growth on germlings. On the other hand, under the independent elevated pCO2 treatment, germling growth was higher than all other treatments. These results show the robustness and plasticity of S. cf. durum adults, indicating the potential for them to acclimate to increased temperature and pCO2. However, the germlings of this species are highly sensitive to global stressors and this could negatively impact this species in future oceans, and ultimately the structure and stability of coral reefs.

Introduction

Coral reefs depend on a multiplicity of organisms to ensure their success. Crustose coralline algae (CCA) are integral inhabitants of coral reef ecosystems, building and stabilising the carbonate framework of coral reefs by deposition of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) [1, 2], providing food to herbivorous fish and invertebrate grazers [1, 3], and inducing the settlement of coral larvae and other invertebrate larvae [46]. CCA’s part in facilitating the induction of coral larvae to a reef give them a crucial role in helping coral reefs withstand and recover from disturbances, and therefore their overall resilience to future changes in our oceans [6, 7].

Coral reefs, which have already experienced warming and are predicted to experience more [8], are among the most threatened ecosystems by environmental changes brought on by the increase in atmospheric CO2, namely the increase in ocean temperature, also termed ocean warming (OW), and ocean acidification (OA), both of which threaten key, calcifying species that make up the framework of reefs, such as CCA. The responses of CCA to changes in their environment are variable, having been found to be mostly either vulnerable or insensitive to both increasing ocean temperature and/or OA [912]. CCA secrete the most soluble polymorph of CaCO3, high Mg-calcite [13] and their process of calcification is suggested to be biologically induced rather than controlled [14], and therefore are thought to be particularly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry that occur with OA [1519]. In saying this, however, there are examples of CCA taxa that are well adapted to extreme environments, such as the freshwater CCA Pneophyllum cetinaensis [20], and the arctic-subarctic Clathromorphum genus [21, 22], which is able to calcify under dark conditions [23]. Moreover, some CCA taxa, particularly those from high energy environments, have areas of the thallus which are rich in dolomite, resulting in lower dissolution rates under high-CO2 treatment [23, 24]. Increases in pCO2 have been found to negatively affect the abundance and community structure of CCA [9, 10]. While, when examining the photophysiology of CCA, the effect of pCO2 on metabolic rate (e.g. net photosynthesis, gross photosynthesis, and respiration) shows species of adult CCA studied to be largely insensitive [11, 12], although there is considerable variability across taxa. No change or increase in O2 production in response to increased pCO2 in algae may be attributed to the presence of carbon concentrating mechanisms or CCMs [25]. A study on the CCA species Porolithon onkodes found gross photosynthesis and respiration to be unaffected by increased pCO2 but net photosynthesis was negatively affected by increased pCO2 [12]. Another study found no effect of pCO2 on net photosynthesis, gross photosynthesis, or respiration [11]. The combined effects of increased temperature and OA have been found to decrease calcification [26] and increase mortality and dissolution [16] in adult CCA species.

Much of the work on CCA and environmental change has been done with adult algae, with fewer studies investigating the combined and independent effects of increased temperature and pCO2 on early life history stages (i.e. spores and germlings). Early life history stages of organisms are thought to be the most influenced by changes in their environment [27, 28]. Our knowledge on offspring or early life history stages of CCA is limited and variable, with studies finding early life history stages to be highly susceptible to combined stressors of increases in temperature and OA [2933] or largely unaffected by pCO2 when it is an independent stressor [34]. A more recent study even suggests CCA can gain tolerance to OA over multiple generations [35]. A study done examining the combined and independent effects of increased temperature, pCO2, and irradiance on germination success of the CCA species Porolithon cf. onkodes found elevated pCO2 was the main driver behind a reduction in the rate of spore germination and a higher rate of abnormalities in developing spores, with the magnitude of the effect being enhanced by elevated temperature [29]. Increased pCO2 also resulted in reduced vertical and marginal growth of germlings [29]. However, an increase in pCO2 was found to increase gross photosynthesis and respiration of germlings from P. cf. onkodes [30]. When the effect of elevated pCO2 was studied on the germlings from another species of coralline algae, Phymatolithon lenormandii, an increase in mortality and abnormalities were found under more acidic conditions, with as little as a 0.1 pH unit change negatively impacting both survival and development [33]. Population persistence of macroalgae rely on spores settling and adhering onto substratum, to continue the algal lifecycle. In a study done by Guenther et al. [31], reduced pH, or the increase of pCO2, resulted in a 40–52% delay in spore attachment and weakened the attachment strength in the coralline alga species, Corallina vancouveriensis. The previously mentioned studies examined shorter-term exposure (1 month or less) to OW and OA, either in combination or independently, and found mostly negative responses over a number of genera. However, a recent study looking at the independent effect of OA on a species of CCA, Hydrolithon reinboldii, found that this species can gain tolerance to OA alone over multiple generations [35], which suggests it’s possible for other species of CCA and corallines alike to exhibit resistance or transgenerational acclimation to OA. It is unknown, however, if and how increased temperature will negate this, and whether other species show similar outcomes.

Here, our study sought to examine the potential for a widely distributed, slow growing, reef building species of CCA, Sporolithon cf. durum (Sporolithon hereafter), to acclimate to global change related stressors across lifecycles. Although Sporolithon is not one of the major reef building species of CCA in tropical reefs, like, but not limited to, P. onkodes [1], Sporolithon is an important reef benthic component [36] (pers. obsv) and a dominant coralline alga of rhodolith beds in the topics and subtropics, particularly in mid-to deep water environments [3739]. Sporolithon spp. mineralise high Mg-calcite within their cell walls like the primary reef building CCA species [14]. Therefore, furthering our knowledge on the responses of Sporolithon to elevated temperature and OA [40] is not only relevant to, but vital for understanding the effects of such stressors on benthic reef communities more broadly and those species that function to cement the framework of coral reefs. Ability to acclimate to environmental conditions through phenotypic plasticity has been seen in previous studies across a range of organisms, partially or fully ameliorating the negative effects of increased temperature and pCO2 [35, 41, 42]. In this study, we present data on the performance of adults (survival and metabolic rates, and reproductive output) and their F1 germlings (growth and survival) from the species Sporolithon exposed to increased temperature and pCO2 over five months and eleven weeks, respectively. Long-term ocean warming (OW) and OA experiments (months to years) are less common than short-term exposure (days to weeks) experiments [43, 44], therefore, the longevity of this experiment enables us to examine the acclimatory potential of this species. It was hypothesised that pCO2 would negatively affect the growth and survival of the germlings and this negative effect would be enhanced by increased temperature. The order that Sporolithon belongs to, Sporolithales, has basal evolutionary origins having diverged and persisted during times of elevated temperature and pCO2 (relative to current levels) [4547], due to this, it was hypothesised that the adult S. cf. durum, although a more recently diverged species from the genus Sporolithon, would acclimate more readily than their germlings to prolonged exposure to increased temperature and pCO2, resulting in low mortality and no effect on metabolic rate across all treatments.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

A permit was obtained for the described study from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Permit number G18/41291.1). All collections (i.e. species collected and collection sites) were in accordance with this permit. No protected species were sampled during this study and care was taken when collecting algae to minimise any impact on the reef.

Algae collection

Adult, reproductive fragments of Sporolithon were collected from reefs (14° 41’ 16.4112” S, 145° 27’ 55.7784” E) surrounding Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia, in January 2018. Fragments of Sporolithon (~4 cm2) were collected on SCUBA using hammer and chisel at ~7–9 m depth. The fragments of Sporolithon collected were totally crustose and occurred in a stable, low light environment (~30–50 μmol photons m-2 s-1). Fragments were brought back to Lizard Island Research Station (LIRS) and kept in common garden in a flow through, 300 L tank in an outdoor aquarium space. Flow through water was supplied from LIRS aquarium system where water is taken from intake plumbing on the reef, immediately in front of LIRS, and filtered upon entrance into the common garden tanks. Each fragment was checked for reproductive structures, or sori [48], which are indicative of the tetrasporophytic reproductive stage for Sporolithon. The surface area of each fragment that had sori on it was kept as consistent as possible (verified and noted for each fragment under a microscope), allowing, to the best of our abilities, for similar number of reproductive structures per fragment (~30–40% of surface area covered by sori). Non-reproductive fragments, and those fragments that did not have 30–40% of their surface area covered by sori, were returned to the reef they were collected from. Reproductive fragments (n = 50) were thoroughly, but gently, cleaned of epiphytes under a microscope using a soft brush and razor blade at LIRS and then transported to the aquatics laboratory at Griffith University. Sporolithon were transported in individually sealed plastic bags filled (50%) with food grade O2. Fragments within each bag were individually wrapped in a lab napkin dampened in seawater. After transport, algae were placed immediately into a common garden tank at a constant 27°C, 8.0 pH, and salinity of 35, mimicking seawater conditions at collection site. Seawater used here was obtained from the Gold Coast Seaway (explained further in Materials and methods section Experimental setup). Two circulating pumps (Aqua One® 8 W) provided adequate water movement in the acclimation tank. Light, measured using underwater quantum sensor LI-192 connected to the light meter LI-250A (LI-COR), was kept around 30 μmol photons m-2 s-1, again, mimicking irradiance levels at collection site (30–50 μmol photons m-2 s-1), which were measured using the underwater quantum sensor LI-192 on a 20 m diving cable connected to the light meter LI-250A (LI-COR). Adult fragments of Sporolithon were allowed to acclimate for 14 days before being placed into experimental treatments. During this time, fragments were again thoroughly cleaned and checked for epiphytes under a microscope, and presence of reproductive structures (sori) was checked using a dissecting microscope towards the end of the 14 days of acclimation. Adult fragments that were most similar in size and crust area occupied by sori were placed into individual, independent experimental tanks after 14 days in common garden.

Experimental setup

To address the effect of increased temperature and pCO2 on the reproductive output, survival, and metabolic processes of adults, and the survival and growth of F1 germlings of the CCA Sporolithon we exposed adults and germlings to a multifactorial laboratory experiment in a purpose-built aquatics laboratory at Griffith University’s Nathan Campus. An indoor, 4-header sump (200 L) recirculating seawater system with 44 (4 L) individual treatment tanks was set up in the aquatics laboratory at Griffith University. 44 fragments of Sporolithon were allocated into one of 44 individual, independent treatment tanks. 3000 L of filtered (5 μm filter) seawater was brought in from the Gold Coast, Seaway, collected on an incoming high tide (Gold Coast, Australia) every two weeks and stored in a primary header/holding tank with two, 3000 L hr-1 circulating pumps to ensure adequate water movement. Seawater in the primary header/holding tank was kept at 27°C, 35 ppt salinity, and had a pH of ~8.0. Partial water changes on the experimental system (3/4 header sump volume) were done every five days to ensure ambient nutrient levels [49], while complete water changes on the experimental system were done every 15 days. pH, salinity, temperature, and alkalinity were measured prior to water changes and after water changes at the beginning of the experiment and no significant difference was found between the values. Water moved from the primary holding tank into the four header sumps was adjusted to respective treatment condition before being pumped (Pond One® Pondmaster 3600) into the 44 independent treatment tanks through separate inflow tubes for each tank (S1 Fig). Temperature and pCO2 were regulated in the header sumps at ambient (27°C, pH 8.0; ~400 μatm), high temperature + ambient pCO2 (29°C, pH 8.0; ~400 μatm), ambient temperature + high pCO2 (27°C, pH 7.7; ~1000 μatm), and high temperature + high pCO2 (29°C, pH 7.7; ~1000 μatm). In treatments where temperature and pCO2 were manipulated, they were gradually increased over seven days to reach target values, ultimately that of 0.3 units below a pH of 8.0 and +2.0°C ambient temperature, relating to levels predicted by the IPCC under the RCP8.5 scenario for end of century levels [50]. pH was controlled by the use of pH-controllers (AquaController, Neptune Systems, USA) that injected either pure CO2 or ambient air into the header sumps until desired value was reached. Temperature was maintained and manipulated by use of titanium heaters (EcoPlus, Aqua Heat, 300 W) within each sump that were set to desired temperature (27°C or 29°C). Flow to each individual treatment tank was maintained at 12 L h-1 allowing for water circulation. A small, submersible pump (Aqua One® 6 W) was placed in each treatment tank as well to allow for adequate water movement. LED lights (MarsAqua 300 W LED, Full Spectrum) provided a 12 h light: 12 h dark photoperiod. During light period, levels were kept at ~30 μmol photons m-2 s-1. Light was measured every other day using the underwater quantum sensor LI-192 connected to a light meter LI-250 A (LI-COR, USA). Adult CCA were kept in their respective treatments for two weeks and examined under a microscope every third day to ensure reproductive structures were still there and spore release hadn’t occurred, which was determined through the lack of visible settled germlings on the experimental tanks and microscopic confirmation of sori still on adult fragments. After two weeks in treatment, each adult fragment was placed on a single gridded, transparent acrylic plate, one plate per treatment tank, n = 11, for a total of 44 acrylic plates (8 cm2, slightly sanded to increase substrate rugosity) and continued to be examined for another two weeks. Adults were kept in treatment for five months; mortality and health were monitored throughout the experiment. After one month in treatment, adults were induced to release spores, this way obtaining individuals of the F1 (method explained in Materials and methods section Induction of spore release).

Carbonate chemistry

Seawater pH was on the total scale (pHT) and was measured twice daily (08:00 and 17:00) in all independent treatment tanks and header sumps for the first two months of the experiment and once daily for the remainder of the experiment using a portable pH meter (Mettler Toledo, SevenGo Duo SG98) paired with a pH electrode with integrated temperature probe (Mettler Toledo, InLab Routine Pro) that was calibrated to the total scale (pHT) using Tris-HCl buffers [51] across five temperatures ranging from 26°C to 30°C. Total alkalinity (AT) was measured every three days for the first three weeks of the experiment and then every week for the remainder of the experiment using open-cell potentiometric titrations (Mettler Toledo, T50) following standard practices (SOP) 3b [51]. Salinity was measured daily using a conductivity meter (Mettler Toledo, SevenGo pro) and adjusted with deionised (DI) water. PHT, AT, temperature, and salinity were used to calculate the carbonate chemistry parameters daily using the Seacarb package version 3.2.12 [52] in the statistical computing program, R version 3.5.1 (S1 Table). High Mg-calcite saturation state was calculated for a 16.4% MgCO3 following method from Diaz-Pulido et al. [16].

Induction of spore release

After the adult fragments of Sporolithon were in their respective treatment for one month (February–March 2018), we induced the release of spores (F1) following an adapted method described in Ordoñez-Alvarez et al. [29]. To ensure we could quantify total reproductive output of adults and have germlings in experimental seawater throughout development (i.e. from their gametogenesis in the adult thalli through to spore release, settlement, germination, and growth over 11 weeks) it was important adult fragments stay in treatment tanks at all times. Therefore, we increased the temperature across the entire system, four header sumps plus the 44 treatment tanks, by 2°C and doubled the light intensity (60 μmol photos m-2 s-1) for four hours, the pCO2/pH was kept stable at respective treatment levels. After this period, light was returned to ambient and temperatures were returned to their respective treatment levels. The following day, the acrylic plate underneath each individual adult fragment was checked for spores/germlings. About half of the adults (n = 22) released spores following temperature and irradiance shock, resulting in either five or six successful individual tanks for each treatment that contained one acrylic plate with settled germlings. The adults that did not release spores were removed from treatments and sacrificed. Adults that successfully released spores were moved into separate treatment tanks so as to not further release spores onto the acrylic plates. All acrylic plates containing spores/germlings were immediately photographed (S2 Fig) using a camera (DP27 colour camera, Olympus Corporation) attached to an Olympus stereomicroscope system (SZX16). An area on each acrylic plate containing six germlings was identified to be followed for average growth and survival measurements, resulting in 5–6 individual tanks (n = 5–6) per treatment.

Spore, germling, and adult measurements

Number of spores released from each adult was recorded (S2 Fig). 24 hours after initial induction, adults were removed from tanks containing acrylic plates. Plates were then placed in a shallow dish containing respective treatment water and photographed using previously mentioned camera and stereomicroscope setup. This was done only once so as to not recount already released spores or spores that might have been released after initial inductions. Photographs were then analysed using imageJ software (v 1.15s National Institutes of Health, USA) and the number of spores per acrylic plate were counted and recorded.

Germling survival and growth rates were measured throughout the experiment every week, from the 18th of March till the 1st of June 2018 (11 weeks). Both measurements were done on the same day over the 11 weeks of the experiment. Survival was recorded weekly through changes in colour (i.e. pigmented to white). Germling growth rate was estimated via imaging a marked area containing six individuals per acrylic plate per treatment tank weekly (S3 Fig), starting with T0 and ending at T11. Images were then processed in imageJ by finding the area of each germling and then averaging these values to get a mean growth rate per treatment tank (n = 5–6). Care was taken initially to choose germlings that settled what we considered an adequate distance apart to avoid coalescence, or the merging of two or more germlings to form one algal crust. Some abnormalities were observed in growth, but this was not quantified.

To estimate health and fitness of adults compared to offspring, we measured their metabolic rates. After five months, adults were removed from treatments (n = 6) to measure O2 production and respiration on all individuals (N = 24). To determine O2 production, adults were removed from tanks about 3 hrs into the 12-hr photoperiod. Each fragment was placed into individual, acrylic incubation chambers (~150 mL). Chambers were placed in a water bath to maintain constant temperature during incubations and above a magnetic stir plate. Chambers were equipped with a temperature sensor (Pt100), a PreSens dipping O2 optode (DP-PSt3) and stir bar to ensure water movement throughout incubation. Percent O2 was measured every minute over 2 hrs with the dipping O2 optodes connected to a 10-channel trace O2 meter (OXY-10 SMA trace, G2, PreSens, Germany). O2 sensors were calibrated every morning prior to measurements to 100% O2 (DI water bubbled with air) and 0% O2 obtained through addition of sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4) to DI water. Irradiance was kept similar to irradiance held throughout the experiment, 30 μmol photons m-2 s-1. A chamber containing no fragment of CCA was included in each incubation to serve as a blank. Respiration was measured after incubating fragments of CCA for 1 hr in total darkness. Respiration was measured over the following hour using the same method as O2 production, but, CCA were kept in dark during measurements. O2 production and respiration measurements were adjusted from a blank and normalised to ash-free dry weight [53] of each fragment.

Data analyses

All data were analysed using the statistical computing program, R (v 3.5.1). Germling response data were tested for normality and variance using QQ normality plots. Photosynthesis, or O2 production, and respiration data of adults were tested for normality using Shapiro Wilk’s tests and Levene’s test for homoscedasticity. If data were found not to be normal, it was log transformed to meet assumptions of normality. Two-way ANOVAs with temperature (2 levels, 27 and 29°C) and pCO2 (2 levels, ~400 and 1000 μatm) set as fixed factors [54], were run on data to determine effect of treatment and their interactions on response variables. When a significant interaction was found between elevated temperature and pCO2 a t-test was performed to calculate the differences between treatments. To analyse survival, the survival R package (v 2.44–1.1) was used in R, which uses the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate survival function and the Fleming-Harrington G-rho family to compare survival curves. Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared tests were done to test significant differences in survival probability across treatments.

Results

Reproductive output

There was no significant effect of increased temperature or pCO2 (low pH) on the reproductive output of adult Sporolithon (p > 0.05, S2 Table and Fig 1).

Fig 1. Effects of temperature and pCO2 (pH) on the reproductive output of adult Sporolithon after one month in treatment conditions.

Fig 1

Each bar represents mean number of spores released for each treatment ± SE (standard error) for n = 5–6.

Germling survival

There was a significant decrease in survival probability amongst Sporolithon germlings (F1) after exposure to the combined treatment of elevated temperature and pCO2 after 11 weeks when compared to all other treatments (Kruskal Wallace Chi-squared = 13.5, p < 0.01, Table 1). No significant effect on survival probability was found between the remaining treatments of ambient, increased temperature, or elevated pCO2 (Table 1 and Fig 2).

Table 1. Germling survival probability and R statistical analysis of survival using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests to determine significant differences in survival at varying treatment conditions.

Treatment Observed deaths Expected deaths (O-E)2 (O-E)2 V-1 Chi2 d.f. = 3 Sig.
pH 8.0 + 27°C 16 18.61 6.76 0.52 n.d. n.s.
pH 8.0 + 29°C 13 22.40 88.36 6.09 n.d. n.s.
pH 7.7 + 27°C 20 19.50 0.25 0.02 n.d. n.s.
pH 7.7 + 29°C 28 16.50 132.25 11.14 13.50 **

n.d. there is no Chi-squared value because there were no differences in observed mortality across treatments. ** < 0.01.

Fig 2. Survival probability of Sporolithon germlings over the duration of the experiment (11 weeks) across temperature and pCO2 (pH) treatments.

Fig 2

Solid lines represent mean values, and dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. The asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05.

Germling growth

Growth of germlings, through changes in area, was measured every seven days throughout the entirety of the experiment. After one week in treatment, there was a reduction in average area under the elevated temperature and pCO2 treatment, however, this was not significant (F1,20 = 0.001, p = 0.976, Table 2 and Fig 3). Mean area was not significantly impacted by a stressor until week seven, where increased temperature significantly reduced, ~20% decrease, the growth of germlings under the high pCO2 treatment (F1,19 = 4.928, p = 0.039, Table 2 and Fig 3). A significant effect of temperature on average growth was seen at week eight (F1,19 = 4.606, p = 0.045, Table 2 and Fig 3), again with about a 20% reduction. At week 11, temperature again was found to be the leading influencing stressor, but its effect significantly depended on the level of pCO2 (i.e. a significant interaction between temperature and pCO2, F1,15 = 0.029, p = 0.007, Table 2 and Fig 3). Here, elevated temperature caused the largest decline in germling size but only in the high pCO2 treatment (reduction of ~40%) (t-test; t = 2.6, p = 0.036).

Table 2. Results of two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) to test the effects of increased temperature and pCO2 (decreased pH) on the average growth of Sporolithon germlings.

Time point Source of variation Df MS F p
Week 2 Temperature 1 0.043 1.735 0.482
pCO2 1 0.013 0.516 0.205
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.000 0.001 0.976
Residuals 20 0.025
Week 3 Temperature 1 0.190 1.860 0.319
pCO2 1 0.107 1.047 0.189
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.190 1.865 0.188
Residuals 20 0.102
Week 4 Temperature 1 0.037 0.515 0.348
pCO2 1 0.067 0.924 0.481
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.039 0.540 0.471
Residuals 20 0.072
Week 5 Temperature 1 0.150 4.076 0.117
pCO2 1 0.101 2.732 0.060
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.019 0.529 0.477
Residuals 20 0.037
Week 6 Temperature 1 0.062 1.650 0.105
pCO2 1 0.109 2.911 0.215
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.030 0.796 0.384
Residuals 20 0.038
Week 7 Temperature 1 0.133 4.928 0.039*
pCO2 1 0.041 1.528 0.232
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.001 0.020 0.889
Residuals 19 0.027
Week 8 Temperature 1 0.005 4.606 0.045*
pCO2 1 0.169 0.147 0.706
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.001 0.002 0.964
Residuals 19 0.037
Week 9 Temperature 1 0.016 0.612 0.446
pCO2 1 0.014 0.544 0.472
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.009 0.338 0.570
Residuals 16 0.026
Week 10 Temperature 1 0.046 1.811 0.200
pCO2 1 0.019 0.758 0.399
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.001 0.020 0.890
Residuals 15 0.026
Week 11 Temperature 1 0.194 6.758 0.020*
pCO2 1 0.025 0.881 0.363
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.278 9.697 0.007**
Residuals 15 0.029

MS = mean square, df = degrees of freedom, F = F-ratio. Note: T-test testing the effect of temperature within elevated pCO2 at week 11 showed p = 0.0362; while the effect of temperature was not significant within ambient pCO2 (p = 0.061). * < 0.05, ** < 0.01.

Fig 3. The percent growth of Sporolithon germlings across temperature and pCO2 (pH) treatments from week to week over 11 weeks.

Fig 3

Each bar represents mean % growth from each treatment at each time point ± SE. Data were log transformed to meet normality.

Adult metabolic rate and survival

The mean metabolic rates (O2 production and respiration) were measured on adult fragments of Sporolithon after five months in treatment. Sporolithon mean rates of O2 production varied between 1.74 and 2.30 μmol O2 g-1 h-1, and respiration values ranged from 4.23 to 3.25 μmol O2 g-1 h-1 consumed. O2 production decreased with increasing pCO2 (lowering pH, Table 3 and Fig 4), and the effect of pCO2 on photosynthesis was found to be significant (F1,18 = 9.56, p = 0.006, Table 3). Temperature did not have an effect on O2 production (F1,18 = 0.439, p > 0.05, Table 3), and there was no interactive effect between increased temperature and pCO2 (F1,18 = 0.671, p > 0.05, Table 3). There was no effect of treatment on respiration rates of Sporolithon (p > 0.05, Table 3 and Fig 4).

Table 3. Results of two-way ANOVA for the effects of temperature and pCO2 (pH) on the metabolic rates of adult fragments of Sporolithon after 5 months in treatment.

Oxygen production (μmol O2 g-1 h-1) Respiration (μmol O2 g-1 h-1)
Two-way ANOVA Df MS F p MS F p
Temperature 1 0.056 0.439 0.516 3.026 1.830 0.192
pCO2 1 1.217 9.560 0.006** 0.495 0.299 0.591
Temperature * pCO2 1 0.085 0.671 0.423 0.113 0.068 0.796
Residuals 18 0.127 1.654

Oxygen produced or consumed (μmol O2 g-1 h-1) was normalised to the ash-free dry weight of individual fragments, n = 5–6.

Fig 4. Effects of temperature and pCO2 (pH) on the mean O2 production and consumption (respiration rate) of adult Sporolithon after five months in treatment.

Fig 4

Each bar represents mean O2 produced or consumed ± SE, n = 5–6.

Survival in adults was not impacted by increased temperature, pCO2, or the combination of the two after five months in treatment. There were no observed deaths throughout or at the end of the five months.

Discussion

Our study shows a contrasting response in life history stages to environmental stressors, with adult Sporolithon being remarkably resistant and early life history stages being very sensitive to OW and OA. These data contribute essential knowledge to understanding the longer-term effects of global change stressors across lifecycles of an important and abundant species of CCA and investigates the potential for acclimation in adult Sporolithon and survivorship and growth of germlings of the first generation (F1). Adult Sporolithon ultimately did well throughout the entirety of this experiment, showing no mortality, no significant change in reproductive output or respiration, and photosynthesis was slightly decreased in response to increased pCO2 (low pH). The results from the adult Sporolithon support the hypothesis that this species is robust, and the divergence time of the genus of Sporolithon, and more broadly the family, may play a role in this [4547]. The slight decrease in O2 production in response to increased pCO2 without any impact on survivorship indicates a potential acclimatory or plastic response to new CO2 conditions [55, 56].

The success of adult life stages is dependent on the health of their earlier life history stages. Here, the response of Sporolithon germlings to global change variables may present an issue for their subsequent life history stages. There were strong and complex interactions between temperature and pCO2. In fact, elevated pCO2 may benefit growth, compared to low pCO2, but, when combined with elevated temperature, there was a strong interaction leading to reduced survival and growth under the combined environmental stressors. Although the genus Sporolithon is not a primary reef builder, they have a similar calcification process to reef building CCA species (e.g. Nash et al. [14]) and are important members of the benthic community in tropical reefs, and the negative response of the germlings to combined environmental stressors may impact some essential functions of CCA in coral reefs under future global change scenarios.

Adult survival & metabolic rates

After five months of exposure to elevated temperature and pCO2, adults of Sporolithon survived and remained visibly healthy, with no thallus mortality observed, across all treatments. However, O2 production was significantly reduced under the high pCO2 treatments at both ambient and high temperature, with an average reduction of 25.22%. The lack of mortality and the reduction in O2 production may be interpreted as a plastic or possibly an acclimatory response to prolonged exposure to elevated pCO2, in which the alga downregulates the photosynthetic activity without significant implication for survivorship [56, 57]. This response has been commonly observed in terrestrial plants, particularly when plants experience nutrient limitation [56, 57]. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 may be attributed to an overabundance of additional carbohydrates that photosynthesis in elevated CO2 provides, suppression of nitrogen assimilation, or at elevated CO2 a reallocation of resources occurs within the photosynthetic apparatus, requiring less Rubisco for photosynthesis [55, 56, 58, 59]. Like in terrestrial plants, nutrients may have played a role in the acclimatory response of Sporolithon to prolonged increased pCO2, and had nutrients been added, we may have seen a “positive” or increase in metabolic rate instead of a “negative” or acclimatory response (as seen in terrestrial plants) [57, 59], however, this hypothesis needs experimental testing. This is a realistic possibility as anthropogenic nutrification is occurring on reefs due to increased agricultural runoff and changing land-use [60, 61]. We acknowledge there are more ways of acclimation to increased pCO2, however, suppression of O2 production, seen in this study, in response to prolonged pCO2 exposure in Sporolithon is likely their acclimatory response, similar to terrestrial plants, in which resources and activities are modulated in order to benefit the plant [5658, 62].

If observing only the effect of pCO2 on the O2 production of species of coralline algae, contrasting responses have been seen, where elevated pCO2 alone hasn’t influenced significant changes in O2 production. This was observed in the tropical CCA species, P. onkodes, after 14 days in treatment there was no effect of elevated pCO2 on stable environment samples [12]. A lack of strong response was also seen in three temperate coralline algae species when exposed to increasing pCO2 [53]. Sporolithon reacted conversely to the above studies, showing a decrease in net production driven by increased pCO2, most likely as an acclimatory response to sustained increased pCO2. The CCMs most likely present in Sporolithon, like in many other macroalgae [6365], may also play a role in why a positive response, or increase in photosynthesis, was not seen in adult Sporolithon. Algae maintaining high affinity CCMs are predicted to not respond to or benefit considerably from increased pCO2 in terms of metabolic processes [25]. Ultimately, the lack of mortality and decrease in photosynthesis suggests this species of CCA is quite robust and able to acclimate to changes in their environment (e.g. increased temperature and pCO2), suggesting a positive outlook for their persistence and function in coral reef ecosystems under future global change scenarios.

Reproductive output

Reproductive output is an essential fitness measurement across organisms and a reduction in this process could negatively impair the persistence of species. However, in this study reproductive output was not found to be significantly influenced by experimental treatment, with only a slight increase in mean number of spores released under the most stressful treatment (high temperature + high pCO2) when compared to the ambient treatment. To our knowledge, no past studies have looked into the reproductive output of CCA after exposure to warming and acidification, however, reproductive output from other calcifying macroalgae [66] and seagrasses [67, 68] has been measured in response to OA. For a species of coralline algae, Arthrocardia corymbosa, altered pH did not significantly alter reproductive output [66]. Elevated pCO2 has been found to increase reproductive output of seagrass [67, 68], and it is suspected that seagrass will be impacted by the interaction of elevated temperature and pCO2 [67]. The slight increase of number of spores in the combined high temperature and pCO2 treatment could have been a stress response and final push to release as many spores as possible after the additional stress of a temperature spike to induce spore release. CCA can reproduce asexually or sexually and maintain different reproductive structures based on this. For Sporolithon the asexual (tetrasporophytic) reproductive structures, sori, are much smaller than the general conceptacle, or asexual reproductive structure on other CCA species [69], which are sometimes even visible by the naked eye [48]. Due to their small size and the differing amount of area sorus take up on each individual crust [69], there was likely variability from adult to adult in each treatment and that may have influenced the variable response in reproductive output across treatments. Although the sori area was kept as constant as possible, large variability was inevitable. Additionally, there is no, non-invasive way to count the number of sori that contain tetraspores. We acknowledge the limitation in completely quantifying reproductive output by measuring number of spores released, and this should be further investigated. Despite the limitations and the variability observed in Sporolithon spore release across treatments, reproductive output was not negatively influenced by temperature and/or CO2 factors, suggesting that the reproductive process is robust to warming and acidification.

Germling survival & growth

The sensitivity of the early life history stages to the combined effects of environmental change stressors supports multiple studies that have found early life history stages to be more vulnerable to global change stressors than adults of the same species [27]. In the current study, high pCO2 in combination with increased temperature resulted in a significant decrease in both survival probability and germling growth, consistent with past studies on the germination success and growth of germlings from the CCA Porolithon cf. onkodes [29].

Coralline algae species differ in their responses to environmental change [912] and this is most likely consistent across their different lifecycles as well. Similarly, other early life history stages of different taxa are highly sensitive to exposure to elevated temperature and pCO2, with reduction in survival found in the juvenile bivalve, Argopecten irradians, after 45 days in treatment [70], and a total die off in the larvae of the brittle star, Ophiothrix fragilis, at reduced pH (7.9 and 7.7) after only 8 days in treatment [71]. Early life history stages of the coral Porites panamensis [72] and the tropical sea hare Stylocheilus striatus [73] had reduced growth under simultaneous high temperature and pCO2. Responses of early life history stages of Sporolithon found in the current study suggest a similarly found [7073] sensitivity to environmental change that could ultimately impact their persistence in future oceans.

Decreased growth rate in our Sporolithon germlings, particularly under combined high temperature and pCO2, could be linked to skeletal dissolution, as documented in other CCA species [29] and a variety of marine calcifiers across life history stages [27, 74, 75]. Skeletal dissolution may be partially explained by undersaturation of seawater with respect to high Mg-calcite under high pCO2 and high temperature (S1 Table, Ω high Mg-calcite = 0.79), although the high pCO2 but low temperature treatment also had a Ω high Mg-calcite < 1, yet germlings experienced comparable growth rates to ambient pCO2. Declined Ω high Mg-calcite in the calcifying fluid (as induced by low pH) has also been proposed to influence calcification in adult Sporolithon [40] and may be a possibility in our experimental germlings. It is also worth considering the influence of not only the carbonate chemistry (i.e. omega) of the experimental seawater and calcifying fluid on germling calcification and growth, but also the interactions of the germlings with the benthos. Germlings were grown on an acrylic substrate in the laboratory environment, whereas, in the field germlings would most likely be growing on porous carbonate substrate with diverse endolithic and epilithic algal communities that modify carbonate chemistry via metabolic processes. Past studies have found substrate to not be critical for CCA community structure [76], however, if substrate plays a role in germling calcification and growth in the presence of lowered pH has not been investigated and it is possible that the carbonate substrate in the field could act as a buffer to changes in carbonate chemistry surrounding the germling. It is important to note that under all treatments, there was mortality and reductions in growth rate. However, the survival probability was still significantly reduced in the combined stressor treatment, whereas the other treatments maintained similar survival probability. Additionally, this can be said with growth, seeing a significant increase under increased pCO2 and a significant decrease in the combined stressor treatment. The negative response of the F1 germlings to the combined stressor treatment suggests a moderately low likelihood for Sporolithon germlings to exhibit a plastic or an acclimatory or adaptive response to combined future environmental changes, in turn greatly reducing the success of the offspring of this species in future oceans. However, the results in the present study somewhat contradict findings from a multigenerational study done with CCA species H. reinboldii, where juvenile resistance to OA was found, recorded as a lessening of difference in growth across generations [35]. In this study, the second-generation of CCA grew 56.1% more slowly across OA treatments relative to the ambient/control treatment, whereas the final generation (7) had only a 0.6% difference in growth when comparing OA treatments to the ambient/control treatment, indicating that sustained exposure to OA across multiple generations enables H. reinboldii to gain a tolerance [35]. The current study suggests that Sporolithon germlings may not be able to exhibit resistance to global change stressors, unlike juveniles of H. reinboldii [35], however, our results may have been more similar should this study have been conducted over multiple generations, and only investigating the response to OA. Alternatively, differences in germling responses between H. reinboldii and Sporolithon may be attributed to species-specific optima for calcification and growth [40].

The data in this study suggest that temperature is a critical factor influencing survival and growth of Sporolithon germlings. On the other hand, the increase of pCO2 in isolation of the increase in temperature (i.e. in ambient temperature conditions) enhanced germling growth. As indicated earlier, however, when combined with increased temperature, growth was significantly decreased. Increased pCO2 at ambient temperature has been found to positively affect growth of some algal species [77], possibly by alleviating CO2 limitation of photosynthesis, or downregulation of CCMs [25]. On the other hand, studies have shown negative growth responses of some coralline algal species to elevated pCO2 at ambient temperature (e.g. P. cf. onkodes recruits/germlings [30] and Arthrocardia corymbose [78]). In our study, temperature played a role in decreasing growth, which has been previously observed in a temperate species of coralline algae [79]. However, in a study with a tropical CCA species, P. cf. onkodes, temperature had a positive effect on growth rate [29]. The differences in responses to the independent stressors of temperature and pCO2 between P. cf. onkodes and Sporolithon could be attributed to a number of reasons including differences between the divergence times of these genera [47, 80], their habitat preferences [81], or other unknown factors. The genus Sporolithon diverged during previous times of high temperature and CO2, possibly suggesting that if more CO2 is present, Sporolithon germlings will positively respond as energy usage for CO2 uptake is reduced and the germlings are able to utilise the additional CO2 instead of relying on CCMs. Of course, increased growth would be highly dependent on temperature (and possibly nutrients as discussed earlier), but it is likely that this increased growth may be realised in habitats exposed to comparatively lower temperatures and light regimes, such as relatively deep-water reefs. Our study illustrates the considerable variability in germling responses to global change among CCA species (e.g. P. onkodes [29, 30], H. reinboldii [35], P. lenormandii [33]).

Concluding remarks

The results from this study show polarising responses from adult Sporolithon and their F1 germlings to increased temperature and pCO2, suggesting life history stage plays an important role in resilience to global change variables and ability to exhibit a plastic response. Adult Sporolithon were largely resilient to increased temperature and pCO2 suggesting a robust potential for acclimation, whereas the results from the F1 germling growth and survival suggest that the germlings of Sporolithon are more sensitive to changes in their environment. The mechanisms explaining the different acclimatory response between life history stages are not well understood, but may be related to 1) variable carbon uptake physiologies (e.g. with germlings lacking or having low affinity CCM as growth increased under high pCO2 alone); 2) variable skeletal mineralogy (e.g. nature, composition, or skeletal protection by living tissue); 3) different composition and/or quantities of cell-wall organic constituents, or 4) different nutrient requirements. In particular, CCA tissue organisation varies throughout ontogenesis [82, 83] and it is likely that different tissues that develop following germination to the formation of adult, thick crusts may have different susceptibilities to pH reduction. For example, CCA spores mainly germinate developing a basal hypothallial tissue [82] and recent studies show the hypothallus of a number of CCA species has different mineralogy from mature (perithallial) tissue (e.g. in Phymatolithon, perithallial cell walls have mean 13.4 mol% MgCO3 while the hypothallus has 17.1 mol% MgCO3) [13], and this may influence early germling development. There is very little information on Sporolithon germination [84] and further work should elucidate the contribution of these processes to the different responses to climate stressors between life history stages of CCA.

Our study also suggests a mechanism by which adult Sporolithon is able to cope with ocean acidification and warming conditions. A decline in O2 production (with no thallus mortality) is a possible indicator of an acclimatory response in this species, and this observation has not been documented previously in other coralline algae [43, 85], but is common in some terrestrial plants [55, 56]. Although there may be a positive outlook for adult Sporolithon to acclimate and possibly eventually adapt to future ocean conditions, the sensitivity of Sporolithon germlings to combined environmental stressors complicates this species persistence in future oceans. A previous study showed OA considerably reduced net calcification of S. durum rhodoliths, suggesting adults of this species may also be sensitive to pH decline [40]. Although we did not measure calcification in our Sporolithon, the negative net calcification rate (i.e. dissolution) observed in the rhodoliths could have been due to the use of this growth form (i.e. rhodoliths, as opposed to crusts), which have considerable internal porosity, potentially facilitating skeletal dissolution. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of OW and OA on gross and net calcification of Sporolithon to obtain a more complete picture of the adult’s sensitivity to climate stressors. Our study began as a novel attempt to conduct a multi-generational study with a slow growing, reef building species of CCA. However, multiple generations were not achieved (cf. Cornwall et al. [35]), therefore, the experiment was adapted to look at the long-term effects of global change factors across lifecycles. Acclimation history of adults prior to collection may have played a role in responses seen in this study, therefore future studies are necessary to more fully compare response to global change across life history stages. These future studies should also further investigate the adaptation potential of this slow growing, ancient group of CCA, specifically looking at the possibility for gained tolerance to both increasing temperature and OA.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Diagram of recirculating, purpose-built aquarium system.

Diagram shows basic experimental setup including primary holding tank, treatment header sumps (n = 4), and independent treatment tanks (11 tanks per treatment).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. F1 germlings settled on an acrylic plate from the high temperature (+2.0°C) and ambient pCO2 (pH) treatment.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Month-old Sporolithon germlings (F1) under stereomicroscope from ambient temperature and high pCO2 (low pH) treatment.

Letters identify individuals that were tracked throughout the experiment for survival and growth.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Seawater carbonate system parameters.

Asterisk indicates parameters that were calculated using R package seacarb (v 3.2.12). High Mg-calcite was calculated for 16.4% calcite following methods from Diaz-Pulido et al. [16].

(PDF)

S2 Table. Two-way ANOVA for the effects of temperature and pCO2 on the number of spores released by Sporolithon adults after one month in different temperature and pCO2 treatments.

Counts of spores were taken from an n = 5–6 adults. One outlier was removed from the increased temperature treatment, which was identified using Tukey’s rule and was more than 1.5 X the interquartile range.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alexandra Ordoñez-Alvarez, Maureen Ho, Patrick Gartrell, and Ellie Bergstrom who assisted in collections and/or husbandry work. The authors would also like to thank Lizard Island Research Station for hosting us during collections.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160103071) awarded to G.D-P. https://www.arc.gov.au/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Adey WH. Coral reefs: algal structured and mediated ecosystems in shallow, turbulent, alkaline waters. Journal of Phycology. 1998;34(3):393–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Littler MM. The crustose corallinaceae. Oceanogr Mar Biol. 1972;10:103–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Steneck RS, Dethier MN. A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos. 1994;69(3):476–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Daume S, Brand-Gardner S, Woelkerling WJ. Settlement of abalone larvae (Haliotis laevigata Donovan) in response to non-geniculate coralline red algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1999;234(1):125–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ritson-Williams R, Arnold SN, Fogarty ND, Steneck RS, Vermeij MJA. New perspectives on ecological mechanisms affecting coral recruitment on reefs. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci. 2009;38:437–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harrington L, Fabricius K, De'ath G, Negri A. Recognition and selection of settlement substrata determine post-settlement survival in corals. Ecology. 2004;85(12):3428–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doropoulos C, Ward S, Diaz-Pulido G, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ. Ocean acidification reduces coral recruitment by disrupting intimate larval-algal settlement interactions. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(4):338–46. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01743.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, et al. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science. 2007;318(5857):1737–42. 10.1126/science.1152509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kuffner IB, Andersson AJ, Jokiel PL, Rodgers KuS, Mackenzie FT. Decreased abundance of crustose coralline algae due to ocean acidification. Nature Geoscience. 2007;1(2):114–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ordoñez-Alvarez A, Doropoulos C, Diaz-Pulido G. Effects of ocean acidification on population dynamics and community structure of crustose coralline algae. Biological Bulletin. 2014;226:255–68. 10.1086/BBLv226n3p255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Comeau S, Carpenter RC, Edmunds PJ. Effects of pCO2 on photosynthesis and respiration of tropical scleractinian corals and calcified algae. ICES J Mar Sci. 2016;74(4):1092–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johnson MD, Moriarty VW, Carpenter RC. Acclimatization of the crustose coralline alga Porolithon onkodes to variable pCO2. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87678 10.1371/journal.pone.0087678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nash MC, Adey W. Multiple phases of mg‐calcite in crustose coralline algae suggest caution for temperature proxy and ocean acidification assessment: Lessons from the ultrastructure and biomineralization in Phymatolithon (Rhodophyta, Corallinales). J Phycol. 2017;53(5):970–84. 10.1111/jpy.12559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nash MC, Diaz-Pulido G, Harvey AS, Adey W. Coralline algal calcification: A morphological and process-based understanding. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0221396 10.1371/journal.pone.0221396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnson MD, Carpenter RC. Nitrogen enrichment offsets direct negative effects of ocean acidification on a reef-building crustose coralline alga. Biology Letters. 2018;14(7):20180371 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Diaz-Pulido G, Anthony KR, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Interactions between ocean acidification and warming on the mortality and dissolution of coralline algae. Journal of Phycology. 2012;1(48):32–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cornwall CE, Diaz-Pulido G, Comeau S. Impacts of ocean warming on coralline algal calcification: Meta-analysis, knowledge gaps, and key recommendations for future research. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2019;6:186. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCoy SJ, Kamenos NA. Coralline algae (Rhodophyta) in a changing world: Integrating ecological, physiological, and geochemical responses to global change. Journal of Phycology. 2015;51(1):6–24. 10.1111/jpy.12262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hofmann LC, Bischof K. Ocean acidification effects on calcifying macroalgae. Aquatic Biology. 2014;22:261–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Žuljević A, Kaleb S, Peña V, Despalatović M, Cvitković I, De Clerck O, et al. First freshwater coralline alga and the role of local features in a major biome transition. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):19642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adey WH, Halfar J, Williams B. The coralline genus Clathromorphum Foslie emend. Adey: biological, physiological, and ecological factors controlling carbonate production in an arctic-subarctic climate archive. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences. 2013;40:1–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rahman MA, Halfar J. First evidence of chitin in calcified coralline algae: New insights into the calcification process of Clathromorphum compactum. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:6162 10.1038/srep06162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nash MC, Opdyke BN, Troitzsch U, Russell BD, Adey WH, Kato A, et al. Dolomite-rich coralline algae in reefs resist dissolution in acidified conditions. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3:268–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Diaz-Pulido G, Nash MC, Anthony KR, Bender D, Opdyke BN, Reyes-Nivia C, et al. Greenhouse conditions induce mineralogical changes and dolomite accumulation in coralline algae on tropical reefs. Nature Communications. 2014;5(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cornwall CE, Revill AT, Hall-Spencer JM, Milazzo M, Raven JA, Hurd CL. Inorganic carbon physiology underpins macroalgal responses to elevated CO2. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:46297 10.1038/srep46297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Johnson MD, Carpenter RC. Ocean acidification and warming decrease calcification in the crustose coralline alga Hydrolithon onkodes and increase susceptibility to grazing. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2012;434:94–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Byrne M. Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: Vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 2011;49:1–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fabricius KE, Kluibenschedl A, Harrington L, Noonan S, De'ath G. In situ changes of tropical crustose coralline algae along carbon dioxide gradients. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ordoñez-Alvarez A, Kennedy EV, Diaz-Pulido G. Reduced spore germination explains sensitivity of reef-building algae to climate change stressors. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0189122 10.1371/journal.pone.0189122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ordoñez A, Wangpraseurt D, Lyndby NH, Kühl M, Diaz-Pulido G. Elevated CO2 leads to enhanced photosynthesis but decreased growth in early life stages of reef building coralline algae. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2018;5:495. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guenther R, Miklasz K, Carrington E, Martone Patrick T. Macroalgal spore dysfunction: Ocean acidification delays and weakens adhesion. Journal of Phycology. 2017;54(2):153–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cumani F, Bradassi F, Di Pascoli A, Bressan G. Marine acidification effects on reproduction and growth rates of Corallinaceae spores (Rhodophyta). Rapp Comm int Mer Medit. 2010;39:735. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bradassi F, Cumani F, Bressan G, Dupont S. Early reproductive stages in the crustose coralline alga Phymatolithon lenormandii are strongly affected by mild ocean acidification. Marine Biology. 2013;160(8):2261–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Padilla-Gamiño JL, Gaitán-Espitia JD, Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. Physiological plasticity and local adaptation to elevated pCO2 in calcareous algae: An ontogenetic and geographic approach. Evolutionary Applications. 2016;9(9):1043–53. 10.1111/eva.12411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cornwall CE, Comeau S, DeCarlo TM, Larcombe E, Moore B, Giltrow K, et al. A coralline alga gains tolerance to ocean acidification over multiple generations of exposure. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10(2):143–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Steneck RS. The ecology of coralline algal crusts convergent patterns and adaptative strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1986;17:273–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Darrenougue N, De Deckker P, Payri C, Eggins S, Fallon S. Growth and chronology of the rhodolith-forming, coralline red alga Sporolithon durum. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2013;474:105–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marshall J, Tsuji Y, Matsuda H, Davies P, Iryu Y, Honda N, et al. Quaternary and tertiary subtropical carbonate platform development on the continental margin of southern Queensland, Australia. Reefs and carbonate platforms in the Pacific and Indian oceans. 1998. 10.1002/9781444304879.ch9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Davies PJ, Braga JC, Lund M, Webster JM. Holocene deep water algal buildups on the eastern Australian shelf. Palaios. 2004;19(6):598–609. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cornwall CE, Comeau S, McCulloch MT. Coralline algae elevate pH at the site of calcification under ocean acidification. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(10):4245–56. 10.1111/gcb.13673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Munday PL. Transgenerational acclimation of fishes to climate change and ocean acidification. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:99 10.12703/P6-99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rodriguez-Romero A, Jarrold MD, Massamba-N'Siala G, Spicer JI, Calosi P. Multi‐generational responses of a marine polychaete to a rapid change in seawater pCO2. Evolutionary Applications. 2015;9(9):10821–1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Comeau S, Cornwall CE, DeCarlo TM, Doo SS, Carpenter RC, McCulloch MT. Resistance to ocean acidification in coral reef taxa is not gained by acclimatization. Nature Climate Change. 2019;9(6):477–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tambutté E, Venn A, Holcomb M, Segonds N, Techer N, Zoccola D, et al. Morphological plasticity of the coral skeleton under CO2-driven seawater acidification. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7368 10.1038/ncomms8368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hönisch B, Ridgwell A, Schmidt DN, Thomas E, Gibbs SJ, Sluijs A, et al. The geological record of ocean acidification. Science. 2012;335(6072):1058–63. 10.1126/science.1208277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aguirre J, Perfectti F, Braga JC. Integrating phylogeny, molecular clocks, and the fossil record in the evolution of coralline algae (Corallinales and Sporolithales, Rhodophyta). Paleobiology. 2010;36(4):519–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peña V, Vieira C, Carlos Braga J, Aguirre J, Rösler A, Baele G, et al. Radiation of the coralline red algae (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta) crown group as inferred from a multilocus time-calibrated phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;150:106845 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Harvey A, Woelkerling W, Farr T, Neill K, Nelson W. Coralline algae of central New Zealand: An identification guide to common ‘crustose’ species. Wellington: NIWA; 2005. 145 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lewis B. Growth and calcification of reef-building coralline algae and their response to ocean acidification [PhD Thesis]: Griffth University; 2016.
  • 50.IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2013. 1535 p.
  • 51.Dickson AG, Sabine CL, Christian JR. Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements: North Pacific Marine Science Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gattuso J-P, Epitalon J-M, Lavigne H, Orr JC, Gentili B, Hagens M, et al. seacarb: seawater carbonate chemistry with R. 3.2.12 ed 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Noisette F, Egilsdottir H, Davoult D, Martin S. Physiological responses of three temperate coralline algae from contrasting habitats to near-future ocean acidification. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2013;448:179–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Drake BG, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Long SP. More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997;48(1):609–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sage RF. Acclimation of photosynthesis to increasing atmospheric CO2: The gas exchange perspective. Photosynth Res. 1994;39(3):351–68. 10.1007/BF00014591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR. Long-term effects of elevated CO2 and nutrients on photosynthesis and rubisco in loblolly pine seedlings. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1993;16(7):859–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gamage D, Thompson M, Sutherland M, Hirotsu N, Makino A, Seneweera S. New insights into the cellular mechanisms of plant growth at elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2018;41(6):1233–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bloom AJ, Asensio JSR, Randall L, Rachmilevitch S, Cousins AB, Carlisle EA. CO2 enrichment inhibits shoot nitrate assimilation in C3 but not C4 plants and slows growth under nitrate in C3 plants. Ecology. 2012;93(2):355–67. 10.1890/11-0485.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wiedenmann J, D’Angelo C, Smith EG, Hunt AN, Legiret F-E, Postle AD, et al. Nutrient enrichment can increase the susceptibility of reef corals to bleaching. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3(2):160–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Knowlton N. The future of coral reefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(10):5419–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: Plants FACE the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55(1):591–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Diaz-Pulido G, Cornwall CE, Gartrell P, Hurd CL, Tran DV. Strategies of dissolved inorganic carbon use in macroalgae across a gradient of terrestrial influence: Implications for the Great Barrier Reef in the context of ocean acidification. Coral Reefs. 2016;35(4):1327–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Raven JA, Beardall J, Sanchez-Baracaldo P. The possible evolution and future of CO2-concentrating mechanisms. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(14):3701–16. 10.1093/jxb/erx110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cornwall CE, Hepburn CD, Pritchard D, Currie KI, McGraw CM, Hunter KA, et al. Carbon-use strategies in macroalgae: Differential responses to lowered pH and implications for ocean acidification. Journal of Phycology. 2012;48(1):137–44. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01085.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cornwall CE, Boyd PW, McGraw CM, Hepburn CD, Pilditch CA, Morris JN, et al. Diffusion boundary layers ameliorate the negative effects of ocean acidification on the temperate coralline macroalga Arthrocardia corymbosa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5): e97235 10.1371/journal.pone.0097235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Koch M, Bowes G, Ross C, Zhang X-H. Climate change and ocean acidification effects on seagrasses and marine macroalgae. Global Change Biology. 2013;19(1):103–32. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02791.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Palacios SL, Zimmerman RC. Response of eelgrass Zostera marina to CO2 enrichment: Possible impacts of climate change and potential for remediation of coastal habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;344:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Townsend R, Woelkerling W, Harvey A, Borowitzka M. An account of the red algal genus Sporolithon (Sporolithaceae, Corallinales) in Southern Australia. Aust Syst Bot. 1995;8(1):85–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Talmage SC, Gobler CJ. Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on the growth and survival of larvae and juveniles of three species of Northwest Atlantic bivalves. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e26941 10.1371/journal.pone.0026941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dupont S, Havenhand J, Thorndyke W, Peck L, Thorndyke M. Near-future level of CO2-driven ocean acidification radically affects larval survival and development in the brittlestar Ophiothrix fragilis. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008;373:285–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Anlauf H, D'Croz L, O'Dea A. A corrosive concoction: The combined effects of ocean warming and acidification on the early growth of a stony coral are multiplicative. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2011;397(1):13–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Armstrong EJ, Allen TR, Beltrand M, Dubousquet V, Stillman JH, Mills SC. High pCO2 and elevated temperature reduce survival and alter development in early life stages of the tropical sea hare Stylocheilus striatus. Marine Biology. 2017;164(5):107. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Miles H, Widdicombe S, Spicer JI, Hall-Spencer J. Effects of anthropogenic seawater acidification on acid-base balance in the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54(1):89–96. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wood HL, Spicer JI, Lowe DM, Widdicombe S. Interaction of ocean acidification and temperature; the high cost of survival in the brittlestar Ophiura ophiura. Marine Biology. 2010;157(9):2001–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kennedy EV, Ordoñez A, Lewis BE, Diaz-Pulido G. Comparison of recruitment tile materials for monitoring coralline algae responses to a changing climate. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2017;569:129–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kübler JE, Johnston AM, Raven JA. The effects of reduced and elevated CO2 and O2 on the seaweed Lomentaria articulata. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22(10):1303–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Roleda MY, Cornwall CE, Feng Y, McGraw CM, Smith AM, Hurd CL. Effect of ocean acidification and pH fluctuations on the growth and development of coralline algal recruits, and an associated benthic algal assemblage. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140394 10.1371/journal.pone.0140394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yoshioka S, Kato A, Koike K, Murase N, Baba M, Liao LM. Effects of water temperature, light and nitrate on the growth of sporelings of the non-geniculate coralline alga Lithophyllum okamurae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology. 2020. 10.1007/s10811-020-02100-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rösler A, Perfectti F, Pena V, Aguirre J, Braga JC. Timing of the evolutionary history of Corallinaceae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology. 2017;53(3):567–76. 10.1111/jpy.12520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Huisman JM, Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, Townsend RA. Marine benthic plants of Western Australia’s shelf-edge atolls. Rec West Aust Mus. 2009;70:50–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Adey WH. The genus Clathromorphum (Corallinaceae) in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia. 1965;26(3–4):539–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chamberlain YM. Studies in the Corallinaceae with special reference to Fosliella and Pneophyllum in the British Isles. Bull Birt Mus(NH) Bot. 1983;11(4):291–463. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chihara M. The significance of reproductive and spore germination characteristics to the systematics of the corallinaceae: nonarticulated coralline algae. Journal of Phycology. 1974;10:266–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Martin S, Gattuso J-P. Response of Mediterranean coralline algae to ocean acidification and elevated temperature. Global Change Biology. 2009;15(8):2089–100. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Bayden D Russell

13 May 2020

PONE-D-20-07282

Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Diaz-Pulido,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers identified the novelty and value in your paper. However, they both felt that some of your conclusions went beyond the inference space based on your experiments. In your revisions, please pay particular attention to moderating the speculative statements in the manuscript. Both reviewers give guidance for where you need to make changes. In addition to this, please revise the description of your experimental design - as it stands it is difficult to understand whether your replicates are independent or not. You should be careful to remove any ambiguity from the experimental design. There are some substantial changes that will need to be made to the manuscript, so I have asked for "major revisions", but I anticipate that you should be able to achieve the required changes.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 27 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bayden D. Russell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160103071) and a Griffith University’s equipment grant (GURIP)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160103071) awarded

to G.D-P.

https://www.arc.gov.au/

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to

publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Page, Tessa M., Guillermo Diaz-Pulido. Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation. Paper submitted to PLOS One

General Reviewer Comments:

An excellent experimental paper on relating elevated CO2 and temperature to growth, metabolism and survival in a coral reef coralline. It should be published. However, without additional information on the abundance and ecology of the species, and especially the comparative embryology and performance of germlings in the wild, I think generalized statements on the implications of the information should be more tempered and the potential problems inherent in the study outlined.

Several specific concerns:

1. Abstract: “Crustose coralline algae (CCA) are vital to coral reefs worldwide, providing structural integrity and inducing the settlement of important invertebrate larvae. CCA are known to be impacted by changes in their environment, both during early development and adulthood. However, long-term studies on either life history stages are lacking in the literature, therefore not allowing time to explore the acclimatory or potential adaptive responses of CCA to future global change scenarios. Here, we exposed an important, slow growing, reef building species of CCA, Sporolithon cf. durum.” In my coral reef experience, Sporolithon species are not important coral reef or algal ridge builders. Typically Sporolithon species occur in deeper water or are cave-dwelling species in reef environments. The collecting notes (“Fragments of Sporolithon (4 cm2) were collected on SCUBA using hammer and chisel at ~7 - 9 m depth. The fragments of Sporolithon collected were totally crustose and occurred in a stable, low light environment (~30 – 50 μmol photons m-2 s-1”), suggest this is so in this case. I note that the author makes no reference to the ecology of this species or of its abundance in coral reef cores. This does not greatly reduce the value of the information, but considerable caution on relating the results of this research to coral reef continued formation in future high CO2/temp seas is warranted.

2. The primary coral reef/algal ridge builders are Porolithon, Lithophyllum and Neogoniolithon, genera far removed evolutionarily from Sporolithon. I think some context as to how anatomy and cell wall structure and calcification in Sporolithon relate to the principal reef builders is desirable if the conclusions of this study are going to be related to stressors of CCA in coral reefs.

3. Intro: “CCA secrete the most soluble polymorph of CaCO3, high-Mg calcite [15] and their process of calcification is suggested to be biologically induced rather than controlled [16], and therefore are thought to be particularly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry that occur with OA [17-21]”. Not wishing to engage the meaning of “biologically induced”, I point out that from recent published studies: CCA grow and calcify (with apparently normal wall structures) in the dark; include widely diverse parasitic genera and species lacking pigments or photosynthesis (and yet producing apparently normal calcification); develop an extraordinary range of Mg concentration (even to dolomite composition, if not crystal structure); and grow in low salinity (and in at least one species) fresh water. The wall-building and calcification processes must be metabolically driven, even if we do not know the precise chemical process. I question the general statement that “CCA are - -particularly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry that occur with OA.”

4. “The order that Sporolithon belongs to, Sporolithales, has basal evolutionary origins having evolved and diversified during times of elevated temperature and pCO2 (relative to current levels) [35, 36], due to this, it was hypothesised that the adult Sporolithon would acclimatise more readily than their germlings to prolonged exposure to increased temperature and pCO2, resulting in low mortality and no effect on metabolic rate across all treatments.” Sporolithon is likely a relatively ancient genus, but S. durum is probably not an ancient species, as suggested. If secure paleontological information on this species and its range in geological time is available, it should be cited.

5. The experiment is well-executed and adults, spore development and release are not affected by the experimental treatments. Significant germling failure (survival, growth and metabolism) is expressed only after many weeks at high temperature and CO2. Because of this, there should have been in situ (reef) controls for the development of germlings, as well as the laboratory controls. Some information on spore settlement ecology and embryology would be helpful for the interpretation of the principal results. As earlier work on C. compactum shows, germling development in corallines is a complex process that includes break-out through the spore wall as hypothallium is developed. Is this a critical stage? As recent literature shows for some species, the basal tissue (hypothallium) has a very different wall chemistry from mature (perithallial) tissue; could this be a factor in early development of germlings. A germling starts as a single large cell, and passes through a complex embryological process to develop a range of tissues; when do the pH/T stressors apply. What stages of early development were the experimental germlings in? Also, in the natural environment, other species, especially algal competitors and grazers, can greatly influence settlement and growth, positive or negative. Substrate in the wild is likely porous carbonate. Would the underlying carbonate buffer in the wild change local sea water acidity within the germling anatomy? Perhaps more crucial, the carbonate substrate that germlings settle on is not likely a dead porous surface; it is likely quite alive at least with boring algal and blue-green filaments; even in a low light environment, it may have a multispecies algal turf. What role does this living surface play in pH control and germling development? We need to know how this surface differs from an acrylic surface relative to your treatments to feel fully secure in the primary conclusions of this study.

6. “Decreased growth rate in our Sporolithon germlings, particularly under combined high temperature and pCO2, could be linked to skeletal dissolution, as documented in other CCA species and a variety of marine calcifiers across life history stages. “ It would be helpful to have SEM based anatomical information that included comparison of calcified wall structure, since there is now considerable information in the literature on the fine structure of the calcified cell walls.

7. Finally, I think the comparisons with the performance of invertebrate species from the literature to be inappropriate for a red alga. Surely there is an alga literature (eg, Halimeda) that would be closer.

Reviewer #2: General comments

This study is interesting, mainly because it provides data on the response of germlings to climate change. Some results are interesting and useful as we need such results on numerous species to full understand changes in communities and because different species often show different responses to comparable treatments.

However, I consider thaat some flaws prevent the ready to fully understand results as well as tobe fully convinced by the interpretations. I also pointed out some speculative comments that should be removed. Moreover, despite I am not an English speaker, I feel that some parts of the text should be polished and should merit a more formal language.

I have some problems with the experimental set-up and I am not able to know if replicates are really independant, that could be a problem for the validity of statistics.

Detailed comments

L. 116: have all fragments the same shape and the same area, how did you neasure it, what about variability?

L. 126: the same, explain with more details

L. 149: Experimental setup. It is unclear. Did you use independant tanks with separate water inflows for each and separate outflows for each? It is mandatory, first to avoid contamination, second to use statistics. Maybe you should provide an diagram as supplementary material.

L. 279-280: Please explain why you performed post-hoc comparisons only when interaction was significant. It is also interesting and important to detect where are the differences among the 4 conditions even when the interaction is not significant (e.g. at weeks 7 and 8, is there only 1 value significantly different from the three other ones?

L. 293: first time you use SEM, explain. I guess it is standard error of the mean but it is also very often called SE only.

L. 344: it is a mean net O2 production, you have to precise it. The same for the Y-axis and for the caption of figure 4

L. 345: replace "between 1.74-2.30" by "between 1.74 and 2.30" and "from 4.23-3.25" by "from 3.24 to 4.23".

L. 350-351: You told the same thing with two different manners: respiration rate and the amount of O2 consumed is the same thing, would you also want to tell about O2 produced ?

L. 393-394: why a plastic or an acclimatory response ? Why not simply a sublethal stress response ?

L. 397: acclimation but L. 370: acclimatisation ?

L. 402-404: too speculative, please remove

L. 434: "Cornwall et al." instead of "Cornwall, Comeau"

L. 435-437: too spéculative, please remove

L. 447: "could have been" instead of "could' ve been", too informal

S2 Table caption: replace * by X. * corresponds to the command to multiply in numerous sofwares, including Excel, but it is not the symbol of multiplication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Walter H. Adey

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0235125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235125.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Jun 2020

Dear Dr. Bayden D. Russell,

We respectfully resubmit our manuscript to PLOS ONE. We are thankful for the constructive suggestions from the reviewers, which we have incorporated into the present draft of the manuscript to the extent possible. For each reviewer’s comments/suggestions, we state each verbatim (Arial Font, highlighted in bold and italics for clarity) and then our response to each (Times Font, regular text). The authors have also added and updated references to support any changes made in response to reviewer comments. A supplemental figure, S1, has been added and Figs 3 and 4 have been updated to reflect reviewer’s comments. Additionally, we would like to add “Griffith University’s equipment grant (GURIP)” to our financial disclosure and have removed any reference to funding in the Acknowledgements section of our manuscript.

We very much hope that you find the present version of the manuscript to be acceptable for publication.

Yours sincerely,

Guillermo Diaz-Pulido Tessa M. Page

g.diaz-pulido@griffith.edu.au tessa.page@griffithuni.edu.au

+ 61 7 373 53840 +61 4 247 75272

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

This has been reviewed and style requirements have been followed.

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160103071) and a Griffith University’s equipment grant (GURIP)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160103071) awarded

to G.D-P.

https://www.arc.gov.au/

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to

publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

This has been removed.

Reviewers' comments:

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Page, Tessa M., Guillermo Diaz-Pulido. Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation. Paper submitted to PLOS One

Reviewer #1: General comments

An excellent experimental paper on relating elevated CO2 and temperature to growth, metabolism and survival in a coral reef coralline. It should be published. However, without additional information on the abundance and ecology of the species, and especially the comparative embryology and performance of germlings in the wild, I think generalized statements on the implications of the information should be more tempered and the potential problems inherent in the study outlined.

The authors would like to thank Reviewer #1 for finding our manuscript to be an excellent experimental paper and for his constructive, and generally illuminating, comments and questions. We have answered each one individually below hopefully addressing them completely. We appreciate the time Reviewer #1 took to fully examine the concepts from our manuscript and provide fascinating feedback.

Several specific concerns:

1. Abstract: “Crustose coralline algae (CCA) are vital to coral reefs worldwide, providing structural integrity and inducing the settlement of important invertebrate larvae. CCA are known to be impacted by changes in their environment, both during early development and adulthood. However, long-term studies on either life history stages are lacking in the literature, therefore not allowing time to explore the acclimatory or potential adaptive responses of CCA to future global change scenarios. Here, we exposed an important, slow growing, reef building species of CCA, Sporolithon cf. durum.” In my coral reef experience, Sporolithon species are not important coral reef or algal ridge builders. Typically Sporolithon species occur in deeper water or are cave-dwelling species in reef environments. The collecting notes (“Fragments of Sporolithon (4 cm2) were collected on SCUBA using hammer and chisel at ~7 - 9 m depth. The fragments of Sporolithon collected were totally crustose and occurred in a stable, low light environment (~30 – 50 μmol photons m-2 s-1”), suggest this is so in this case. I note that the author makes no reference to the ecology of this species or of its abundance in coral reef cores. This does not greatly reduce the value of the information, but considerable caution on relating the results of this research to coral reef continued formation in future high CO2/temp seas is warranted.

The authors acknowledge Reviewer #1’s concern with labelling Sporolithon cf. durum as an “important” reef or algal ridge builder. And, although Sporolithon can still be said to be an important structural and ecological component of tropical reefs due to its place within the CCA family, it is not a true major reef builder in comparison to other CCA species such as Porolithon or Lithophyllum. However, free-living or rhodoliths of Sporolithon durum can form extensive meadows in tropical reefs and therefore, our results have implications for reef building processes in the broader sense. To balance our statements with those from Reviewer #1, we have removed any notion of Sporolithon being a primary reef builder from our manuscript, however, we still retain their role as a reef builder. We have also mentioned its wide distribution and place within the CCA family.

Reviewer #1 also mentioned the lack of ecological information of Sporolithon in our manuscript. Although there is some information on tropical Sporolithon in its free-living rhodolith form (e.g. Darrenougue et al. [1]; Marshall et al. [2]; Davies et al. [3]), there is very little information on this genus as a sessile, completely attached coralline alga (e.g. Verheij [4]). The authors have conducted surveys of CCA in the GBR but this information is still been processed and no quantitative trends can be drawn at this stage. However, we can say that sessile species of this genus primarily occur in low light environments (as mentioned earlier in the paper, line 140), and do not seem to be major builders of shallow-water reef frameworks, at least compared to the roles play by other CCA taxa such as Porolithon spp. or Lithophyllum spp (lines 108 - 117 & 417 – 420). We have added some additional information on the ecology of Sporolithon in the new version of the manuscript (lines 108 – 117).

2. The primary coral reef/algal ridge builders are Porolithon, Lithophyllum and Neogoniolithon, genera far removed evolutionarily from Sporolithon. I think some context as to how anatomy and cell wall structure and calcification in Sporolithon relate to the principal reef builders is desirable if the conclusions of this study are going to be related to stressors of CCA in coral reefs.

The authors acknowledge this comment and have added statements within the manuscript clarifying that Sporolithon is not a primary reef builder, however, is still an important member of the CCA and a benthic component (as detailed before), having similar mineralisation and calcification processes as primary reef builders and it is therefore still crucial that we study this species. It is, however, worth mentioning that there are no comparative studies on the anatomy and cell wall structure and calcification of Sporolithon and major reef builders. Lines have been added in the introduction to inform the reader that although Sporolithon is not a primary reef builder, it is still important to study them – “…Sporolithon is an important reef benthic component [5] (pers. obsv) and a dominant coralline alga of rhodolith beds in the topics and subtropics, particularly in mid-to deep water environments [1-3]. Sporolithon spp. mineralise high Mg-calcite within their cell walls like the primary reef building CCA species [6]. Therefore, furthering our knowledge on the responses of Sporolithon to elevated temperature and OA [7] is not only relevant to, but vital for understanding the effects of such stressors on benthic reef communities more broadly and those species that function to cement the framework of coral reefs.” (lines 110 – 113) and in the discussion “…Although the genus Sporolithon is not a primary reef builder, they have a similar calcification process to reef building CCA species (e.g. Nash et al. [6]) and are important members of the benthic community in tropical reefs…” (lines 417 – 420).

3. Intro: “CCA secrete the most soluble polymorph of CaCO3, high-Mg calcite [15] and their process of calcification is suggested to be biologically induced rather than controlled [16], and therefore are thought to be particularly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry that occur with OA [17-21]”. Not wishing to engage the meaning of “biologically induced”, I point out that from recent published studies: CCA grow and calcify (with apparently normal wall structures) in the dark; include widely diverse parasitic genera and species lacking pigments or photosynthesis (and yet producing apparently normal calcification); develop an extraordinary range of Mg concentration (even to dolomite composition, if not crystal structure); and grow in low salinity (and in at least one species) fresh water. The wall-building and calcification processes must be metabolically driven, even if we do not know the precise chemical process. I question the general statement that “CCA are - -particularly sensitive to changes in seawater carbonate chemistry that occur with OA.”

The authors acknowledge that this statement was quite general in regard to CCA being particularly sensitive to OA, as different taxa could, and do, respond conversely to seawater carbonate chemistry and environmental changes more broadly. A statement following this statement outlining other studies that have found species of CCA to be particularly robust and/or well adapted to extreme environments and more specifically OA, see lines 56 – 61 “In saying this, however, there are examples of CCA taxa that are well adapted to extreme environments, such as the freshwater CCA Pneophyllum cetinaensis [8], and the arctic-subarctic Clathromorphum genus [9, 10], which is able to calcify under dark conditions [11]. Moreover, some CCA taxa, particularly those from high-energy environments, have areas of the thallus which are rich in dolomite, resulting in lower dissolution rates under high-CO2 treatment [11, 12].”

4. “The order that Sporolithon belongs to, Sporolithales, has basal evolutionary origins having evolved and diversified during times of elevated temperature and pCO2 (relative to current levels) [35, 36], due to this, it was hypothesised that the adult Sporolithon would acclimatise more readily than their germlings to prolonged exposure to increased temperature and pCO2, resulting in low mortality and no effect on metabolic rate across all treatments.” Sporolithon is likely a relatively ancient genus, but S. durum is probably not an ancient species, as suggested. If secure paleontological information on this species and its range in geological time is available, it should be cited.

The authors acknowledge this comment and have included more specific citations to Peña et al. [13] and Aguirre et al. [14]. Although from the Aguirre, et al. paper [14], S. durum is suggested, from the phylogenetic tree, to having diverged around 98.5 mya from the common ancestor with the genus Heydrichia, however, as there are no other species from the Sporolithon genus represented in this tree, it is unreliable, albeit does support that the genus itself diverged around 98.5 mya, showing their basal origins. In the recently published paper by Peña, et al. (still in press) [13], the species S. durum is suggested, with notable variation, to having diverged more recently, but, the genus of Sporolithon diverged around 70 mya (although with considerable variation around the node), and the order Sporolithales around 137 mya. Both of these papers have been referenced in our manuscript. Additionally, a comment following the one under question has been added, stating that although S. cf. durum is more recently diverged, the genus still maintains its basal divergence time, lines 128 – 131. Additionally, on lines 408 & 409.

5. The experiment is well-executed and adults, spore development and release are not affected by the experimental treatments. Significant germling failure (survival, growth and metabolism) is expressed only after many weeks at high temperature and CO2. Because of this, there should have been in situ (reef) controls for the development of germlings, as well as the laboratory controls. Some information on spore settlement ecology and embryology would be helpful for the interpretation of the principal results. As earlier work on C. compactum shows, germling development in corallines is a complex process that includes break-out through the spore wall as hypothallium is developed. Is this a critical stage? As recent literature shows for some species, the basal tissue (hypothallium) has a very different wall chemistry from mature (perithallial) tissue; could this be a factor in early development of germlings. A germling starts as a single large cell and passes through a complex embryological process to develop a range of tissues; when do the pH/T stressors apply. What stages of early development were the experimental germlings in? Also, in the natural environment, other species, especially algal competitors and grazers, can greatly influence settlement and growth, positive or negative. Substrate in the wild is likely porous carbonate. Would the underlying carbonate buffer in the wild change local sea water acidity within the germling anatomy? Perhaps more crucial, the carbonate substrate that germlings settle on is not likely a dead porous surface; it is likely quite alive at least with boring algal and blue-green filaments; even in a low light environment, it may have a multispecies algal turf. What role does this living surface play in pH control and germling development? We need to know how this surface differs from an acrylic surface relative to your treatments to feel fully secure in the primary conclusions of this study.

The authors thank Reviewer #1 for this in-depth comment and the fascinating questions asked about the spore settlement ecology of our species. Several points:

Reviewer #1 comment on “As earlier work on C. compactum shows, germling development in corallines is a complex process that includes break-out through the spore wall as hypothallium is developed. Is this a critical stage? As recent literature shows for some species, the basal tissue (hypothallium) has a very different wall chemistry from mature (perithallial) tissue; could this be a factor in early development of germlings. A germling starts as a single large cell and passes through a complex embryological process to develop a range of tissues; when do the pH/T stressors apply. What stages of early development were the experimental germlings in?”: Our response: The germlings were in experimental seawater all the time, from their gametogenesis in the adult thalli through to spore release, settlement, germination and growth over 11 weeks (lines 240 – 244). We didn’t systematically follow the anatomical changes of spores through the process of germination and are unable to compare the cell wall anatomy of the early stages to those of the adults. We acknowledge recent research by Nash et al. [6] has found clear differences between hypothallial and perithallial cells for some species of CCA, as has another study comparing four species from the genus Phymatolithon, which found different phases of Mg-calcite in perithallial cell walls (mean 13.4 mol% MgCO3) and in the hypothallium (mean 17.1 mol% MgCO3) [15]. Nonetheless, we are unable to confirm this in our experimental Sporolithon, as this was not the focus of our study. It is however, a very interesting question and something should be investigated in future studies. The role of variable skeletal mineralogy between adults and germlings has been suggested as an explanation to differences in response between the life history stages (line 584). We have expanded on this discussion within our manuscript to incorporate the valuable comments from the Reviewer #1. See lines 588 – 598, where different composition and/or quantities of cell-wall organic constituents has been suggested as an explanation for differences in response of life history stages and text following this considering the variation of tissue organisation throughout ontogenesis.

Reviewer #1 comment on “What role does this living surface play in pH control and germling development?” Our response: The authors have added a comment into the discussion acknowledging the potential for substrate interaction. Our previous studies have found substrate to not be critical for CCA community structure Kennedy et al. [16], however, substrate-CCA interactions and OA have not been investigated. The reviewer adds another level of complexity to the ecology of the early stages, which is the interactions with the “living substrate”, which is filled with endolithic and epilithic algae and all the associated biogeochemical process. It is well documented that the benthos exerts a strong control of the carbonate chemistry in the adjacent micro- and macro-environment, as well as on the water column (e.g. Anthony et al. [17]; McNichol et al. [18]). Therefore, conceptually, the nature of the living substrate may influence germling development and pH effects in complex ways (e.g. altering the diffusive boundary layers, photosynthesis, calcification/dissolution, grazing, etc), and this may influence spore development. This suggests that our results in a laboratory setting using an artificial substrate could potentially be different to those obtained in a natural living substrate. Unfortunately, we have not conducted a comparative study on spore development between lab and field settings and are unable to answer these questions. On the other hand, using living substrates may make the attribution of the effects of temperature/OA on germlings difficult, as there would be direct and indirect interactions with algal turfs, endolithic algae, etc, all altering the dissolution of calcium carbonate, influencing the buffering capacity of microenvironments, etc, as mentioned by Reviewer #1. As a first step in our research program, we have addressed temperature/OA on germling survival, and future studies should address complexities with living substrates. We have however acknowledged the complex interactions between living substrates and spores within the manuscript (lines 525 – 532).

6. “Decreased growth rate in our Sporolithon germlings, particularly under combined high temperature and pCO2, could be linked to skeletal dissolution, as documented in other CCA species and a variety of marine calcifiers across life history stages. “ It would be helpful to have SEM based anatomical information that included comparison of calcified wall structure, since there is now considerable information in the literature on the fine structure of the calcified cell walls.

The authors agree that having SEM information for this study would be illuminating, and although originally intentioned, SEM images were not gathered for the germlings and therefore we cannot present this data here.

7. Finally, I think the comparisons with the performance of invertebrate species from the literature to be inappropriate for a red alga. Surely there is an alga literature (eg, Halimeda) that would be closer.

The authors acknowledge this comment and have replaced some comparisons to other algal or seagrass species (see lines 473 – 478). However, we would like to leave a few, impactful references comparing invertebrates as PLOS ONE has a broad audience and we find the comparisons to be beneficial in broadening the reach of this manuscript and in appealing to this larger audience.

Reviewer #2: General comments

This study is interesting, mainly because it provides data on the response of germlings to climate change. Some results are interesting and useful as we need such results on numerous species to full understand changes in communities and because different species often show different responses to comparable treatments.

The authors would like to thank Reviewer #2 for appreciating the value of our manuscript and finding aspects of it interesting. We would also like to thank Reviewer #2 for their constructive comments and hope we have addressed them fully and made appropriate edits to the manuscript.

However, I consider thaat some flaws prevent the ready to fully understand results as well as tobe fully convinced by the interpretations. I also pointed out some speculative comments that should be removed. Moreover, despite I am not an English speaker, I feel that some parts of the text should be polished and should merit a more formal language.

We have addressed Reviewer #2’s concerns below and have further clarified the methods in the study. Additionally, speculative comments have been removed or adapted to address Reviewer #2’s concerns. Language of the manuscript has been reviewed further, polished where necessary, and introduced a more formal language where we found needed.

I have some problems with the experimental set-up and I am not able to know if replicates are really independant, that could be a problem for the validity of statistics.

The authors have addressed this more fully in the “detailed comments” section below.

Detailed comments

L. 116: have all fragments the same shape and the same area, how did you neasure it, what about variability?

The authors thank Reviewer #2 for making this suggestion to clarify this aspect of our methods. Sporolithon fragments were collected that were around 4 cm2 in living tissue area (edited on line 138). This was visually verified when collecting, however, was not an important metric for collection. However, the surface area of each fragment that had sori was measured (which has further been explained in lines 148 – 151) and was kept as consistent as possible (~30 – 40%). We did not deem the exact size or shape of each fragment to be notable, although all fragments were crustose and maintained similar area of tissue covered in reproductive structures.

L. 126: the same, explain with more details

The authors have addressed this with the above comment.

L. 149: Experimental setup. It is unclear. Did you use independant tanks with separate water inflows for each and separate outflows for each? It is mandatory, first to avoid contamination, second to use statistics. Maybe you should provide an diagram as supplementary material.

The authors have further clarified the experimental methods to specifically state that each of the 44 tanks were independent and water from the sumps was fed to these tanks through separate inflow tubes (lines 170, 180, 191, & 192). Additionally, a diagram of the recirculating system has been made and supplied in supplementary material (Fig S1).

L. 279-280: Please explain why you performed post-hoc comparisons only when interaction was significant. It is also interesting and important to detect where are the differences among the 4 conditions even when the interaction is not significant (e.g. at weeks 7 and 8, is there only 1 value significantly different from the three other ones?

We thank Reviewer #2 for this comment, and this has prompted us to rethink the use of the post-hoc comparisons. We have excluded port-hoc comparisons as the ANOVAs of the maim effects of each factor are already giving us the comparisons we need for testing our hypothesis. To clarify, we conducted a two-way ANOVA, with temperature (two levels) and pCO2 (two levels), therefore no need to conduct post-hoc comparisons as there are only two levels. However, to further clarify, when the temp*CO2 interaction term was significant, we performed t-tests (lines 313 & 314) to calculate the differences between treatments (i.e. the effect of temperature within pCO2), as instructed in Prof Underwood’s, book [19].

L. 293: first time you use SEM, explain. I guess it is standard error of the mean but it is also very often called SE only.

This has been changed within the figure captions to read SE, instead of SEM. SE has also been defined in first usage.

L. 344: it is a mean net O2 production, you have to precise it. The same for the Y-axis and for the caption of figure 4

This has been added within the manuscript on line 375 and within the axis and caption of figure 4.

L. 345: replace "between 1.74-2.30" by "between 1.74 and 2.30" and "from 4.23-3.25" by "from 3.24 to 4.23".

This has been changed within the manuscript to read as suggested by Reviewer #2.

L. 350-351: You told the same thing with two different manners: respiration rate and the amount of O2 consumed is the same thing, would you also want to tell about O2 produced ?

This repetition has been removed and now reads “respiration rates” only.

L. 393-394: why a plastic or an acclimatory response ? Why not simply a sublethal stress response ?

The reviewer brings up an interesting point, however, the literature on plants indicates suppression of photosynthetic activity is an acclimatory response after exposure to elevated CO2, not a sublethal stress response. Additionally, as we did not observe any changes to adult Sporolithon health otherwise (i.e. no mortality or no changes in the pigmented/living layer), it in which sublethal stress from the literature has found, we would not consider this a sublethal stress response, unless potentially there was an energetic trade-off in response to the sublethal stress but as this was not seen in the independent elevated temperature treatment as well, it is more unlikely. We therefore use a plastic / acclamatory response for the photosynthetic response observed in adult Sporolithon.

L. 397: acclimation but L. 370: acclimatisation ?

The authors thank Reviewer #2 for this catch, and this has been changed within the manuscript. It should read “acclimation” as this was a lab conducted study and did not occur in the field, which is when “acclimatisation or acclimatise” would be appropriate.

L. 402-404: too speculative, please remove

The authors acknowledge this is hypothetical but believe this will provide directions for future research work and would like to keep this text. We have however reworded this comment to reflect this. Text added in line 442: “…however, this hypothesis needs experimental testing.”.

L. 434: "Cornwall et al." instead of "Cornwall, Comeau"

This has been removed per comment below.

L. 435-437: too spéculative, please remove

The suggestion that Sporolithon germlings could exhibit similar responses to the CCA species used in Cornwall, et al., 2020 had the authors experiment been continued has been removed from the manuscript.

L. 447: "could have been" instead of "could' ve been", too informal

This has been changed within the manuscript.

S2 Table caption: replace * by X. * corresponds to the command to multiply in numerous sofwares, including Excel, but it is not the symbol of multiplication.

The authors thank Reviewer #2 for this clarification, and this has been changed within the manuscript.

References

1. Darrenougue N, De Deckker P, Payri C, Eggins S, Fallon S. Growth and chronology of the rhodolith-forming, coralline red alga Sporolithon durum. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2013;474:105-19.

2. Marshall J, Tsuji Y, Matsuda H, Davies P, Iryu Y, Honda N, et al. Quaternary and tertiary subtropical carbonate platform development on the continental margin of southern Queensland, Australia. Reefs and carbonate platforms in the Pacific and Indian oceans. 1998. doi: 10.1002/9781444304879.ch9.

3. Davies PJ, Braga JC, Lund M, Webster JM. Holocene deep water algal buildups on the eastern Australian shelf. Palaios. 2004;19(6):598-609.

4. Verheij E. The genus Sporolithon (Sporolithaceae fam. nov., Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Phycologia. 1993;32(3):184-96. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-32-3-184.1.

5. Steneck RS. The ecology of coralline algal crusts convergent patterns and adaptative strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1986;17:273-303.

6. Nash MC, Diaz-Pulido G, Harvey AS, Adey W. Coralline algal calcification: A morphological and process-based understanding. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0221396.

7. Cornwall CE, Comeau S, McCulloch MT. Coralline algae elevate pH at the site of calcification under ocean acidification. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(10):4245-56.

8. Žuljević A, Kaleb S, Peña V, Despalatović M, Cvitković I, De Clerck O, et al. First freshwater coralline alga and the role of local features in a major biome transition. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):19642.

9. Adey WH, Halfar J, Williams B. The coralline genus Clathromorphum Foslie emend. Adey: biological, physiological, and ecological factors controlling carbonate production in an arctic-subarctic climate archive. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences. 2013;40:1-41.

10. Rahman MA, Halfar J. First evidence of chitin in calcified coralline algae: New insights into the calcification process of Clathromorphum compactum. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:6162.

11. Nash MC, Opdyke BN, Troitzsch U, Russell BD, Adey WH, Kato A, et al. Dolomite-rich coralline algae in reefs resist dissolution in acidified conditions. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3:268-72.

12. Diaz-Pulido G, Nash MC, Anthony KR, Bender D, Opdyke BN, Reyes-Nivia C, et al. Greenhouse conditions induce mineralogical changes and dolomite accumulation in coralline algae on tropical reefs. Nature Communications. 2014;5(1):1-9.

13. Peña V, Vieira C, Carlos Braga J, Aguirre J, Rösler A, Baele G, et al. Radiation of the coralline red algae (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta) crown group as inferred from a multilocus time-calibrated phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;150:106845.

14. Aguirre J, Perfectti F, Braga JC. Integrating phylogeny, molecular clocks, and the fossil record in the evolution of coralline algae (Corallinales and Sporolithales, Rhodophyta). Paleobiology. 2010;36(4):519-33.

15. Nash MC, Adey W. Multiple phases of mg‐calcite in crustose coralline algae suggest caution for temperature proxy and ocean acidification assessment: Lessons from the ultrastructure and biomineralization in Phymatolithon (Rhodophyta, Corallinales). J Phycol. 2017;53(5):970-84.

16. Kennedy EV, Ordoñez A, Lewis BE, Diaz-Pulido G. Comparison of recruitment tile materials for monitoring coralline algae responses to a changing climate. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2017;569:129-44.

17. Anthony KRN, Diaz-Pulido G, Verlinden N, Tilbrook B, Andersson AJ. Benthic buffers and boosters of ocean acidification on coral reefs. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(7):4897-909.

18. McNicholl C, Koch MS, Hofmann LC. Photosynthesis and light-dependent proton pumps increase boundary layer pH in tropical macroalgae: A proposed mechanism to sustain calcification under ocean acidification. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2019;521:151208.

19. Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press1997.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Bayden D Russell

10 Jun 2020

Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation

PONE-D-20-07282R1

Dear Dr. Diaz-Pulido,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Bayden D. Russell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for doing a good job of addressing the reviewers comments and incorporating the new material that the reviewers requested.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Bayden D Russell

12 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-07282R1

Plasticity of adult coralline algae to prolonged increased temperature and pCO2 exposure but reduced survival in their first generation

Dear Dr. Diaz-Pulido:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Bayden D. Russell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Diagram of recirculating, purpose-built aquarium system.

    Diagram shows basic experimental setup including primary holding tank, treatment header sumps (n = 4), and independent treatment tanks (11 tanks per treatment).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. F1 germlings settled on an acrylic plate from the high temperature (+2.0°C) and ambient pCO2 (pH) treatment.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Month-old Sporolithon germlings (F1) under stereomicroscope from ambient temperature and high pCO2 (low pH) treatment.

    Letters identify individuals that were tracked throughout the experiment for survival and growth.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Seawater carbonate system parameters.

    Asterisk indicates parameters that were calculated using R package seacarb (v 3.2.12). High Mg-calcite was calculated for 16.4% calcite following methods from Diaz-Pulido et al. [16].

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Two-way ANOVA for the effects of temperature and pCO2 on the number of spores released by Sporolithon adults after one month in different temperature and pCO2 treatments.

    Counts of spores were taken from an n = 5–6 adults. One outlier was removed from the increased temperature treatment, which was identified using Tukey’s rule and was more than 1.5 X the interquartile range.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES