Abstract
Purpose
This study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the preoperative fibrinogen and systemic inflammation response index (F-SIRI) in a Chinese cohort of resectable gastric cancer.
Materials and Methods
Baseline characteristics, preoperative fibrinogen levels and peripheral neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts were retrospectively reviewed in 240 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. The optimal cut-off values for fibrinogen and SIRI were defined as 4.0 g/L and 1.2. Then patients with hyperfibrinogenemia (≥4.0 g/L) and high SIRI (≥1.2) were assigned with an F-SIRI of 2 (both of these hematological abnormalities), 1 (one of these abnormalities), and 0 (neither abnormality), respectively. The prognostic value was examined by univariate and multivariate survival analysis.
Results
Preoperative F-SIRI was significantly correlated with tumor size, fibrinogen level, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas there was no significant difference in age, gender, tumor location or other characteristics between groups. In addition, high preoperative F-SIRI was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.299; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.482–3.566; P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 2.461; 95% CI, 1.584–3.824; P<0.001) by univariate survival analysis. Moreover, it remained an independent predictor for impaired DFS (HR, 2.023; 95% CI, 1.273–3.215; P=0.003) and OS (HR, 2.341; 95% CI, 1.480–3.705; P<0.001) in multivariate Cox regression analysis.
Conclusions
Preoperative F-SIRI could serve as a significantly prognostic marker for long-term survival in Chinese patients who underwent radical gastrectomy.
Keywords: Gastric cancer, Fibrinogen, Inflammation, Prognosis
INTRODUCTION
Gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignant disease and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Surgery is the only opportunity to cure, unfortunately, the rate of recurrence or distant metastasis in patients receiving radical gastrectomy remains high [2]. Although multimodal strategies are used to further improve the outcome, the 5-year survival rate is still less than 30%. Therefore, it is currently actively searching for more effective therapeutics. However, there still lack reliable prognostic markers to guide clinical treatment decisions for individual patient.
Cancer-associated inflammation is a clear hallmark of malignancies that greatly contributes to the development and progression of cancer [3]. Fibrinogen, a glycoprotein produced by hepatocytes and a key regulator of the hemostatic system, plays an important role in coagulation, cell adhesion and systemic inflammatory responses [4]. In addition, elevated levels of fibrinogen have been observed in various malignancies including gastric cancer and significantly associated with tumor progression, invasion, distant metastasis, as well as poor survival [5,6,7,8,9,10].
Peripheral blood leukocytes are one of the indicators of inflammation response, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. Besides, several new inflammation-based indexes have been established to predict the prognosis of patients with malignancies, such as platelet-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) [11,12,13]. Fibrinogen and NLR (F-NLR) have been used to predict the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after esophagectomy, and have shown a good predictive effect [14]. Recently, the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), which is calculated primarily based on peripheral neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts, has been identified as a reliable prognostic factor for gastric adenocarcinoma [15].
Therefore, we proposed a prognostic index based on preoperative fibrinogen and SIRI (F-SIRI) and to examine whether it could more accurately predict the long-term survival for resectable gastric cancer cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of the preoperative F-SIRI with clinicopathological variables and its prognostic significance in patients with resectable gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
Between January 2007 and December 2016, a consecutive cohort of 300 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in Hefei (Anhui, People's Republic of China) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and had diseases or received anticoagulants that would affect the hemostatic system. In addition, we also excluded subjects without preoperative information of hemostasis and patients died of causes other than gastric cancer. Furthermore, cases with malignancies other than gastric cancer, acute or chronic concurrent non-cancerous diseases, concurrent distant metastasis, or those who were lost during follow-up period were also excluded. Finally, a total of 240 eligible patients were enrolled in the present study.
This study was approved by the independent Ethics Committee at The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Quick-PJ 2020-07-16) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. And written consent was obtained from all included patients.
Treatment and follow-up
All included patients underwent radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to those with high risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis. Routine blood and biochemical tests, tumor markers, ultrasound/computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were regularly evaluated after surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time interval from the date of diagnosis to local recurrence/distant metastasis or to the last follow-up, overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to death from cancer or to the most recent follow-up.
Clinical and laboratory variables
Patient's baseline characteristics, preoperative fibrinogen levels, neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes, as well as other parameters were retrospectively reviewed and collected from the electronic medical records. Stages were classified according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (the 8th edition). The long diameter measured with the general post-operative pathological specimen was determined as the tumor size. The locations of primary tumor were divided into upper, middle, lower and diffuse stomach, respectively. The degree of differentiation was categorized into poorly/not differentiated and moderately/well differentiated.
Blood specimens were obtained within one week before surgery. Plasma fibrinogen levels were tested by an automatic coagulation analyzer (Sysmex CS-5100; Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). The counts of neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte were examined using an automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN-9000, Sysmex Corporation).
Definition of Fibrinogen and SIRI Index (F-SIRI)
SIRI was calculated as follows: SIRI=neutrophil count×monocyte count/lymphocyte count. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the normal range of plasma fibrinogen concentration was 2.0–4.0 g/L, and plasma concentrations above 4.0 g/L were defined as hyperfibrinogenemia [16]. Therefore, the optimal cut-off value for preoperative fibrinogen was defined as 4.0 g/L. Meanwhile, the optimal cut-off value for SIRI was determined as 1.2 by X-tile 3.6.1 software (Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA). Patients with elevated fibrinogen (≥4.0 g/L) and SIRI (≥1.2) were allocated an F-SIRI of 2, those with only one of these 2 abnormalities were assigned an F-SIRI of 1, and those with neither of the 2 abnormalities were allocated an F-SIRI of 0.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The correlation between variables was determined by Pearson's χ2 test. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to perform univariate and multivariate analysis and hazard ratios (HRs) for parameters respecting to DFS and OS were calculated. HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and 2-sided P-value were reported. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered to be with statistical significance.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
Two hundred and forty patients were enrolled in the present study. The baseline characteristics were shown in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 60.5 years (ranged, 22.0–86.0 years). The cohort consisted of 163 males (67.9%) and 77 females (32.1%). According to the 8th edition AJCC staging criteria, 26 (10.8%) patients were classified with stage I, 40 (16.7%) patients were stage II, and 174 (72.5%) patients were stage III diseases. Lymph node metastasis was positive in 198 (82.5%) of the patients. Four fifths (190, 79.2%) of the cases received adjuvant chemotherapy (Table 1).
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics and their correlations with preoperative F-SIRI (n=240).
| Clinicopathologic characteristics | Patients | F-SIRI score | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Age (yr) | 0.172 | |||||
| <60 | 115 (47.9) | 74 (52.9) | 29 (32.2) | 12 (21.1) | ||
| ≥60 | 125 (52.1) | 66 (47.1) | 61 (67.8) | 45 (78.9) | ||
| Gender | 0.936 | |||||
| Man | 163 (67.9) | 96 (68.6) | 45 (66.2) | 22 (68.7) | ||
| Woman | 77 (32.1) | 44 (31.4) | 23 (33.8) | 10 (31.3) | ||
| Tumor location | 0.568 | |||||
| Upper | 102 (42.5) | 55 (39.3) | 33 (48.5) | 14 (43.8) | ||
| Middle | 43 (17.9) | 28 (20.0) | 9 (13.3) | 6 (18.7) | ||
| Lower | 52 (21.7) | 35 (25.0) | 12 (17.6) | 5 (15.6) | ||
| Diffuse | 43 (17.9) | 22 (15.7) | 14 (20.6) | 7 (21.9) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.001 | |||||
| <5 | 102 (42.5) | 74 (52.9) | 18 (26.5) | 10 (31.3) | ||
| ≥5 | 138 (57.5) | 66 (47.1) | 50 (73.5) | 22 (68.7) | ||
| Degree of differentiation | 0.968 | |||||
| Well/moderate | 58 (24.2) | 33 (23.6) | 17 (25.0) | 8 (25.0) | ||
| Poor/undifferentiated | 282 (75.8) | 107 (76.4) | 51 (75.0) | 24 (75.0) | ||
| T stage | 0.689 | |||||
| T1/T2 | 43 (17.9) | 26 (18.6) | 13 (19.1) | 4 (12.5) | ||
| T3/T4 | 197 (82.1) | 114 (81.4) | 55 (80.9) | 28 (87.5) | ||
| N stage | 0.109 | |||||
| N0 | 42 (17.5) | 26 (18.6) | 10 (14.7) | 6 (18.8) | ||
| N1 | 66 (27.5) | 43 (30.7) | 17 (25.0) | 6 (18.8) | ||
| N2 | 74 (30.8) | 43 (30.7) | 25 (36.8) | 6 (18.8) | ||
| N3 | 58 (24.2) | 28 (20.0) | 16 (23.5) | 14 (43.6) | ||
| TNM stage | 0.129 | |||||
| I | 26 (10.8) | 18 (12.9) | 7 (10.3) | 1 (3.1) | ||
| II | 40 (16.7) | 22 (15.7) | 11 (16.2) | 7 (21.9) | ||
| III | 174 (72.5) | 100 (71.4) | 50 (73.5) | 24 (75.0) | ||
| Lymph node status | 0.773 | |||||
| Negative | 42 (17.5) | 26 (18.6) | 10 (14.7) | 6 (18.8) | ||
| Positive | 198 (82.5) | 114 (81.4) | 58 (85.3) | 26 (81.2) | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.039 | |||||
| No | 50 (20.8) | 22 (15.7) | 17 (25.0) | 11 (34.4) | ||
| Yes | 190 (79.2) | 118 (84.3) | 51 (75.0) | 21 (65.6) | ||
| SIRI | >0.050 | |||||
| <1.20 | 210 (87.5) | 140 (100) | 38 (55.9) | 0 (0) | ||
| ≥1.20 | 30 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 30 (44.1) | 32 (100) | ||
| Preoperative fibrinogen level (g/L) | 3.360 (1.19–7.15) | 2.955 (1.19–3.99) | 4.060 (1.84–5.83) | 4.635 (4.03–7.15) | <0.001 | |
Values are presented as number (%) or median (range). The bold numbers in the tables are P-values with statistical significance (<0.05).
F-SIRI = fibrinogen and systemic inflammation response index; TNM = tumor-node-metastasis; SIRI = systemic inflammation response index.
Correlation between preoperative F-SIRI and clinicopathologic variables
Of the enrolled 240 patients, 140 (58.3%) were assigned an F-SIRI of 0, 68 (28.3%) had an F-SIRI of 1 and 32 (13.3%) had an F-SIRI of 2 (Table 1). The analysis demonstrated that preoperative F-SIRI was significantly correlated with tumor size, adjuvant chemotherapy and fibrinogen levels (P=0.001, P=0.039 and P<0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in age, gender, tumor location, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node status or TNM stage between groups (Table 1).
Prognostic Impact of preoperative fibrinogen or SIRI
The patients with low fibrinogen values (<4.0g/L) had a better DFS and OS than those with high fibrinogen values (P<0.01; Fig. 1A and B). Similarly, low SIRI (<1.2) was associated with prolonged DFS and OS in resectable gastric cancer patients (P<0.001; Fig. 1C and D).
Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of (A), DFS and (B), OS stratified by preoperative fibrinogen levels; (C), DFS and (D), OS stratified by SIRI in 240 resectable gastric cancer patients (with log-rank test).
DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival; SIRI = systemic inflammation response index.
Prognostic significance of preoperative F-SIRI in resectable gastric cancer
A Cox univariate model for DFS revealed that high preoperative F-SIRI was significantly associated with impaired DFS (HR, 2.299; 95% CI, 1.482–3.566; P<0.001; Fig. 2A). Age (<60/≥60 years), tumor size (<5/≥5 cm), depth of invasion (T1–2/T3–4), lymph node involvement (negative/positive), TNM stage (I–II/III), adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), SIRI (<1.2/≥1.2) and fibrinogen (<4.0/≥4.0 g/L) were other significant prognostic parameters identified by univariate analysis (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, preoperative F-SIRI (HR, 2.023; 95% CI, 1.273–3.215; P=0.003) remained an independent prognostic indicator for DFS. TNM stage (HR, 2.464; 95% CI, 1.810–3.356; P<0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.213; 95% CI, 0.154–0.294; P<0.001) were other independent prognostic factors (Table 2).
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of (A), DFS and (B), OS stratified by preoperative F-SIRI in 240 resectable gastric cancer patients (with log-rank test).
F-SIRI = fibrinogen and systemic inflammation response index; DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival.
Table 2. Clinicopathological factors, F-SIRI, and DFS: univariate and multivariate analysis (n=240).
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| Age (yr) | 0.036 | 0.165 | |||||
| <60 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| ≥60 | 1.453 | 1.024–2.060 | 1.293 | 0.900–1.857 | |||
| Gender | 0.968 | NI | |||||
| Man | Ref. | ||||||
| Woman | 1.008 | 0.696–1.458 | |||||
| Tumor location | 0.154 | NI | |||||
| Diffuse | Ref. | ||||||
| Upper | 0.694 | 0.429–1.122 | |||||
| Middle | 0.522 | 0.318–0.859 | |||||
| Lower | 0.898 | 0.559–1.440 | |||||
| Tumor size | 0.001 | 0.094 | |||||
| <5 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| ≥5 | 1.910 | 1.314–2.775 | 1.409 | 0.944–2.104 | |||
| Differentiation | 0.715 | NI | |||||
| Well/moderate | Ref. | ||||||
| Poor/undifferentiated | 1.080 | 0.714–1.633 | |||||
| Depth of invasion | 0.001 | 0.022 | |||||
| T1/T2 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| T3/T4 | 2.685 | 1.481–4.868 | 2.132 | 1.117–4.073 | |||
| Lymph node involvement | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| Negative | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| Positive | 2.889 | 1.593–5.239 | 3.586 | 1.921–6.694 | |||
| TNM stage | <0.001 | NI | |||||
| I/II | Ref. | ||||||
| III | 2.926 | 1.813–4.723 | |||||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| No | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| Yes | 0.302 | 0.207–0.442 | 0.219 | 0.147–0.328 | |||
| SIRI | <0.001 | NI | |||||
| <1.20 | Ref. | ||||||
| ≥1.20 | 1.964 | 1.363–2.828 | |||||
| Fibrinogen | 0.012 | NI | |||||
| <4 | Ref. | ||||||
| ≥4 | 1.594 | 1.107–2.296 | |||||
| F-SIRI score | <0.001 | 0.003 | |||||
| 0/1 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| 2 | 2.299 | 1.482–3.566 | 2.023 | 1.273–3.215 | |||
The bold numbers in the tables are P-values with statistical significance (<0.05).
F-SIRI = fibrinogen and systemic inflammation response index; TNM = tumor-node-metastasis; DFS = disease-free survival; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; SIRI = systemic inflammation response index; NI = not included; Ref. = reference.
In addition, univariate analysis of OS indicated that patients with high preoperative F-SIRI tended to have unfavorable OS (HR, 2.461; 95% CI, 1.584–3.824; P<0.001; Table 2; Fig. 2B). Moreover, other parameters including age, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement, TNM staging, adjuvant chemotherapy, fibrinogen and SIRI could also significantly predict OS (P<0.05). Furthermore, high preoperative F-SIRI could also serve as an independent predictor for OS (HR, 2.341; 95% CI, 1.480–3.705; P<0.001) after adjusting for other confounding factors. As expected, depth of invasion (HR, 2.002; 95% CI, 1.058–3.791; P=0.033), lymph node involvement (HR, 3.286; 95% CI, 1.771–6.098; P<0.001), as well as adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.358; 95% CI, 0.242–0.529; P<0.001) were also significant independent predictors for OS (Table 3).
Table 3. Clinicopathological factors, F-SIRI, and OS: univariate and multivariate analysis (n=240).
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | ||
| Age (yr) | 0.012 | 0.065 | |||||
| <60 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| ≥60 | 1.565 | 1.102–2.222 | 1.404 | 0.979–2.014 | |||
| Gender | 0.484 | NI | |||||
| Man | Ref. | ||||||
| Woman | 0.876 | 0.605–1.269 | |||||
| Tumor location | 0.152 | NI | |||||
| Diffuse | Ref. | ||||||
| Upper | 0.678 | 0.419–1.097 | |||||
| Middle | 0.529 | 0.322–0.869 | |||||
| Lower | 0.885 | 0.551–1.421 | |||||
| Tumor size | 0.001 | 0.189 | |||||
| <5 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| ≥5 | 1.891 | 1.302–2.748 | 1.309 | 0.876–1.958 | |||
| Differentiation | 0.367 | NI | |||||
| Well/moderate | Ref. | ||||||
| Poor/undifferentiated | 1.210 | 0.800–1.829 | |||||
| Depth of invasion | 0.001 | 0.033 | |||||
| T1/T2 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| T3/T4 | 2.770 | 1.528–5.022 | 2.002 | 1.058–3.791 | |||
| Lymph node involvement | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| Negative | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| Positive | 2.998 | 1.653–5.439 | 3.286 | 1.771–6.098 | |||
| TNM stage | <0.001 | NI | |||||
| I/II | Ref. | ||||||
| III | 3.082 | 1.910–4.973 | |||||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| No | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| Yes | 0.440 | 0.301–0.643 | 0.358 | 0.242–0.529 | |||
| SIRI | <0.001 | NI | |||||
| <1.20 | Ref. | ||||||
| ≥1.20 | 1.999 | 1.387–2.881 | |||||
| Fibrinogen | 0.005 | NI | |||||
| <4 | Ref. | ||||||
| ≥4 | 1.681 | 1.166–2.424 | |||||
| F-SIRI score | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| 0/1 | Ref. | Ref. | |||||
| 2 | 2.461 | 1.584–3.824 | 2.341 | 1.480–3.705 | |||
The bold numbers in the tables are P-values with statistical significance (<0.05).
F-SIRI = fibrinogen and systemic inflammation response index; TNM = tumor-node-metastasis; OS = overall survival; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; SIRI = systemic inflammation response index; NI = not included; Ref. = reference.
DISCUSSION
This study evaluated the prognostic significance of preoperative F-SIRI in a Chinese cohort of resectable gastric cancer patients. The results showed that preoperative F-SIRI was significantly associated with systemic inflammatory response and clinical outcomes, indicating that patients with high preoperative F-SIRI had a higher risk of local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, and had a poorer prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first one reporting the prognostic value of preoperative F-SIRI which was established based on preoperative fibrinogen and peripheral neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts in resectable gastric cancer.
Since 2011, cancer-related inflammation has been recognized as an important the seventh important marker of cancer [3]. In addition, there is increasing evidence suggesting that local immune responses and systemic inflammation could promote tumor growth, deterioration and metastasis, and are closely associated with long-term survival [17,18,19]. Results from several studies have indicated that gastric cancer patients with elevated plasma fibrinogen are closely associated with unfavorable prognosis [10,20]. Moreover, Yu and his colleagues [8] found that hyperfibrinogenemia was significantly associated with tumor progression and was an independent indicator for poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, Yu et al. [9] suggested that preoperative serum fibrinogen levels were positively correlated with advanced tumor stage and survival rates in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and they were also independent risk factors for survival in such cases. These findings indicate that fibrinogen is a promising marker for predicting tumor behavior and outcome in conventional blood tests.
Recently, Qi et al. [21] first proposed that SIRI, which was determined based on neutrophil, monocyte and lymphocyte counts could serve as an independent predictor of postoperative recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Besides, its prediction ability was shown to be greater than that of the NLR and LMR and was associated with chemoresistance, higher serum inflammatory cytokine/chemokine levels and shorter outcomes [21]. In addition, Li et al. [15] evaluated the prognostic value of SIRI in patients with gastric cancer who received radical gastrectomy. The results showed that SIRI was an independent predictor for DFS and disease-specific survival, and was closely related to age, tumor size, TNM staging, lymphatic vessel and peripheral invasion. Meanwhile, patients with low SIRI could benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and had a better prognosis [15]. Moreover, Geng and his colleagues [22] demonstrated that SIRI could predict postoperative survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and survival analysis indicated that the median OS in patients with SIRI ≤1.2 was significantly higher than that in patients with SIRI >1.2 (P<0.05). Furthermore, the nomogram including SIRI could predict OS more accurately compared with the TNM staging system.
Therefore, we proposed that preoperative F-SIRI might predict survival more accurately in gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. The results of the present study show that there was no significant difference in the lymph node status or the TNM stage between the groups, probably because lymph node involvement was mainly a reflection of aggressive tumor behavior and not closely associated with systemic inflammatory response [23]. Moreover, F-SIRI was not related to the depth of invasion, thus requiring further study. In addition, univariate analysis showed that preoperative fibrinogen and SIRI were both prognostic factors and multivariate analysis indicated that F-SIRI was an independent prognostic predictor for DFS (HR, 2.023; 95% CI, 1.273–3.215; P=0.003) and OS (HR, 2.341; 95% CI, 1.480–3.705; P<0.001). Besides, patients with SIRI ≥1.2 would have a worse outcome after curative resection compared with those, which was consistent with the results of the previous 2 studies [15,22]. Furthermore, the median DFS and OS of patients with an F-SIRI of 0, 1, and 2 differed significantly, suggesting that patients with an F-SIRI of 2 had more malignant tumors than those with F-SIRI of 0 or 1. Thus, F-SIRI could serve as a good indicator and tool for monitoring the general inflammation and predicting the survival of gastric cancer patients.
In conclusion, although the present study were mainly limited to the lack of measurements of other inflammatory parameters, retrospective single-center design and small sample size, the results showed that preoperative F-SIRI could serve as a novel and promising marker for predicting long-term survival, to help more accurate risk classification and design optimal treatment strategies for resectable gastric cancer patients. However, further studies with large cohort are still needed to verify these findings.
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by the Science and Technology Department of Anhui Province, China (1804h08020240).
- Conceptualization: G.W.
- Data curation: G.W., Z.F.
- Formal analysis: G.W., H.J.
- Funding acquisition: H.J.
- Investigation: H.J., M.T., Z.F.
- Methodology: Z.F.
- Resources: H.J.
- Software: G.W.
- Supervision: H.J., M.T.
- Validation: G.W., H.J.
- Visualization: Z.F.
- Writing - original draft: G.W., Z.F.
- Writing - review & editing: H.J., M.T.
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thrumurthy SG, Chaudry MA, Hochhauser D, Mughal M. The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer. BMJ. 2013;347:f6367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen level is a useful predictor of adjacent organ involvement in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12:81–87. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Perisanidis C, Psyrri A, Cohen EE, Engelmann J, Heinze G, Perisanidis B, et al. Prognostic role of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:960–970. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamashita H, Kitayama J, Nagawa H. Hyperfibrinogenemia is a useful predictor for lymphatic metastasis in human gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:595–600. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yamashita H, Kitayama J, Kanno N, Yatomi Y, Nagawa H. Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with lymphatic as well as hematogenous metastasis and worse clinical outcome in T2 gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:147. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yu W, Wang Y, Shen B. An elevated preoperative plasma fibrinogen level is associated with poor overall survival in Chinese gastric cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;42:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu X, Hu F, Yao Q, Li C, Zhang H, Xue Y. Serum fibrinogen levels are positively correlated with advanced tumor stage and poor survival in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy: a large cohort retrospective study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:480. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2510-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suzuki T, Shimada H, Nanami T, Oshima Y, Yajima S, Ito M, et al. Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with inflammatory mediators and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2016;46:1394–1401. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1339-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang WJ, Du Y, Zhao X, Ma LY, Cao GW. Inflammation-related factors predicting prognosis of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:4586–4596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pan QX, Su ZJ, Zhang JH, Wang CR, Ke SY. A comparison of the prognostic value of preoperative inflammation-based scores and TNM stage in patients with gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:1375–1385. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S82437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang K, Diao F, Ye Z, Zhang X, Zhai E, Ren H, et al. Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2017;36:75. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0243-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arigami T, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, Uchikado Y, Uenosono Y, Kita Y, et al. Analysis of the fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a promising blood marker of tumor progression and prognosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1702. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li S, Lan X, Gao H, Li Z, Chen L, Wang W, et al. Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), cancer stem cells and survival of localised gastric adenocarcinoma after curative resection. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:2455–2468. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2506-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wakatsuki K, Matsumoto S, Migita K, Ito M, Kunishige T, Nakade H, et al. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen is associated with lymph node metastasis and predicts prognosis in resectable esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2017;41:2068–2077. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3991-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e493–e503. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70263-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Taniguchi K, Karin M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:309–324. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fest J, Ruiter R, Mulder M, Groot Koerkamp B, Ikram MA, Stricker BH, et al. The systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer—A population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:692–698. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Palaj J, Kečkéš Š, Marek V, Dyttert D, Waczulíková I, Durdík Š. Fibrinogen levels are associated with lymph node involvement and overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:1097–1104. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qi Q, Zhuang L, Shen Y, Geng Y, Yu S, Chen H, et al. A novel systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer after chemotherapy. Cancer. 2016;122:2158–2167. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Geng Y, Zhu D, Wu C, Wu J, Wang Q, Li R, et al. A novel systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting postoperative survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;65:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Motoyama S, Miura M, Hinai Y, Maruyama K, Usami S, Saito H, et al. CRP genetic polymorphism is associated with lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2479–2485. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0525-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]