Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
. 2020 Apr 24;318(6):H1371–H1378. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00024.2020

Sirt1 during childhood is associated with microvascular function later in life

Paula Rodriguez-Miguelez 1,2, Jacob Looney 2, Jeffrey Thomas 2, Gregory Harshfield 2, Jennifer S Pollock 2,3, Ryan A Harris 2,4,
PMCID: PMC7311696  PMID: 32330091

Abstract

Microvascular dysfunction often precedes other age-related macrovascular conditions and predicts future cardiovascular risk. Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) has recently emerged as a protein that protects the vasculature and reduces the risk of cardiovascular diseases. We tested the hypothesis that lower Sirt1 during childhood is associated with a reduced microvascular function during adulthood. Thirty-four adults (34 ± 3 yr) from the Augusta Heart Study returned to participate in the present clinical observational study. Sirt1 was assessed in samples collected during both adulthood and participants’ childhood (16 ± 3 yr), and data were divided based on childhood Sirt1 concentrations: <3 ng/dL (LowCS; n = 16) and ≥3 ng/dL (HighCS; n = 18). MVF was evaluated in all of the adults using laser-Doppler flowmetry coupled with three vascular reactivity tests: 1) local thermal hyperemia (LTH), 2) post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH), and 3) iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh). The hyperemic response to LTH was significantly (P ≤ 0.044) lower in the LowCS than in the HighCS group. Similarly, the LowCS also exhibited an ameliorated (P ≤ 0.045) response to the PORH test and lower (P ≤ 0.008) vasodilation in response to iontophoresis of ACh when compared with the HighCS. Positive relationships were identified between childhood Sirt1 and all MVF reactivity tests (r≥0.367, P ≤ 0.004). Novel observations suggest that lower Sirt1 during childhood is associated with premature microvascular dysfunction in adulthood. These findings provide evidence that Sirt1 may play a critical role in microvascular function and have therapeutic potential for the prevention of age-associated vascular dysfunction in humans.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY With a longitudinal cohort, novel observations from the present study demonstrate that individuals who had lower Sirt1 early in life exhibit premature microvascular dysfunction during adulthood and may be at higher risk to develop CVD. These results provide experimental evidence that Sirt1 may play an important role in microvascular function with age and represent a potential therapeutic target to prevent premature vascular dysfunction.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk, childhood, microvascular function, Sirt1

INTRODUCTION

Microvascular dysfunction is considered a crucial mechanism in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Indeed, a dysfunctional microvasculature often precedes other macrovascular pathological processes (27, 29) and is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (36). The cutaneous microcirculation represents an accessible model of generalized microvascular function through the assessment of endothelial-dependent vasodilatory mechanisms (23, 27). Numerous studies have identified cutaneous microvascular dysfunction in a variety of cardiovascular pathologies (29, 59, 70) that are accompanied with reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability (23) and conduit vessel endothelial dysfunction (9, 24, 28).

Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) belongs to a class of highly conserved histone deacetylases that regulate critical biological functions involved in aging (8, 38, 67). Sirt1 prevents premature senescence through a large number of mechanisms. Indeed, low expression and/or the dysregulation of this protein are associated with vascular dysfunction and overt CVD (2, 69). Conversely, greater Sirt1 improves endothelial function, reduces oxidative stress, ameliorates systemic inflammation, and, overall, exerts cardioprotective effects (44, 74). Sirt1 mediates vascular protection through regulating different processes, including the deacetylation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and the associated increase in NO synthesis (13). Indirectly, Sirt1 reduces oxidative stress, preserving the degradation of NO and increasing endothelial-dependent vasodilation (77). Thus, targeting an increase in Sirt1 is emerging as a potential therapeutic approach for different cardiovascular (CV)-related diseases (48, 51, 56, 65).

To date, there have been very few studies that have assessed the impact that Sirt1 has on microvascular function in humans. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to examine whether Sirt1 during childhood could be associated with microvascular function later in life. We hypothesized that lower concentrations of Sirt1 during childhood would be associated with microvascular dysfunction during early adulthood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design.

All participants presented to the Laboratory of Integrative Vascular and Exercise Physiology (LIVEP) on two separate occasions, a preliminary day and an experimental day. The preliminary day consisted of the assessment of body composition, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, and standard clinical laboratory values. For the experimental visit, participants reported to the LIVEP at 8:00 am following an overnight fast and having abstained from tobacco, caffeine, and vigorous physical activity for 24 h and from vitamin supplementation for 72 h. A standard venipuncture blood draw was performed, and assessments of microvascular function and arterial stiffness were conducted. Data were analyzed based on concentrations of Sirt1 during childhood between those individuals who had concentrations <3 ng/mL (LowCS) and those who exhibited concentrations >3 ng/mL (HighCS). The cutoff point was established after a percentile assessment of available published data that analyzed Sirt1 using similar methodology (median/Q2 = 3.12 ng/mL) (1, 15, 30, 39, 40) and our present data (median/Q2 = 2.96 ng/mL). Investigators were blinded to Sirt1 childhood concentrations during data collection and analysis.

Participants.

Thirty-four adults (34 ± 3 yr) that had been participating in the Augusta Heart Study (25), a longitudinal investigation evaluating cardiovascular health, were recruited to participate in the present study. Participants were excluded from the present investigation if they 1) had a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 (class III obesity), 2) were postmenopausal or pregnant, 3) were diagnosed with any cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, cerebral, or metabolic disease, 4) were prescribed any vasoactive medications (i.e., nitrates, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, PDE-5 inhibitors, etc.), or 5) had symptoms of uncontrolled hypertension. All participants were informed of the objectives and possible risks of the investigation before written consent/assent for participation was obtained. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Augusta University (No. 611895).

Demographic characteristics and clinical laboratory values.

Standard anthropometric assessments of height, weight, calculated body mass index (BMI), and body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; QDR-4500W; Hologic, Inc.) to evaluate the percentage of body fat were performed. Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were evaluated in triplicate using established protocols (26), and the average of three assessments was used to calculate mean arterial pressure.

Following an overnight fast, venous blood samples (∼30 ml) were collected from the antecubital vein into EDTA Vacutainer systems (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). All blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min to separate plasma. Plasma samples were stored at −80°C for future analysis. Fasting concentrations of standard biochemical values for lipids [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and triglycerides] and glucose concentrations were obtained using the Cholestech LDX point of care analyzer (Alere, Providence, RI). Hemoglobin and hematocrit values were obtained using the HemoPoint H2 analyzer (Stanbio Laboratory, Boerne, TX). Concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone were obtained from standard core laboratory techniques (Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Burlington, NC).

Concentrations of Sirt1.

Plasma samples collected at two different points were used to assess Sirt1 concentrations. Samples were collected as part of the Augusta Heart Study, when participants were in their childhood (16 ± 3 yr), and samples were collected during the actual experimental visit when participants were adults (34 ± 3 yr). Samples were stored at −80°C until the assessment. Circulating concentrations of Sirt1 were measured using a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Kit (MyBiosource) with a detection range from 0.78 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL, an intra-assay coefficient of variation of ≤8%, and an interassay coefficient of ≤12%.

Cutaneous microvascular function.

Changes in cutaneous microvascular blood flux were quantified using laser-Doppler flowmetry (MoorVMS-LDF; Moor Instruments). Briefly, the right arm of each participant was extended laterally at ∼80° of shoulder abduction, and the distal forearm was secured in a vacuum-packed pillow (Vacpac). A forearm cuff was placed immediately distal to the medial epicondyle, and an iontophoresis gel electrode was placed on the dorsal part of the wrist. A heater probe and an iontophoresis chamber were placed on the ventral surface of the forearm using double-sided adhesive tape. The placement was carefully selected, avoiding any area with hair, broken skin, areas of skin pigmentation (or tattoos), and visible veins.

After a 20-min acclimation period and in a temperature-controlled room (22 ± 2°C) to achieve a hemodynamic steady state, microvascular function was determined using three endothelial-dependent vasodilation reactivity tests: 1) local thermal hyperemia (LTH), 2) post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH), and 3) iontophoresis of acetylcholine. Baseline (BL) flux was determined by calculating a 30-s average before the pertinent protocol was started, and we assured that flux after the PORH protocol returned to baseline flux before LTH or iontophoresis was started. A biological zero (B0), to control for the Brownian movement of macromolecules in cutaneous interstitial space, was determined while the forearm cuff was inflated during the PORH protocol and subtracted from both baseline and peak responses. Cutaneous blood flow was indexed as red blood cell flux (RBF) in perfusion units (PU) and as cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC): RBF divided by mean arterial blood pressure. Results are presented as 1) the maximal hyperemic response (peak), 2) the area under the curve (area), 3) the relative change in flux expressed as a percentage of maximal dilation (CVCmax), and 4) the time to peak (TTP) that represents the time from the start of the stimuli to the maximal hyperemic response. Skin resistance (SR) was also calculated for every individual using Ohm’s law.

Local thermal hyperemia.

Local thermal hyperemia (LTH) was determined using a heater probe (SH02-SHP1H; Moor Instruments) placed proximal to the occlusion cuff on the ventral surface of the forearm. The LTH chamber was heated at >0.1°C/s until 44°C for 25 min to elicit maximal microvascular dilation (10). No discomfort was reported from the participants during the heating process, as has been previously described with same temperature (61). The maximal response was quantified as the peak response and expressed as CVCmax. All the other variables related to the heating protocol are defined with the subscript LTH.

Post-occlusive reactive hyperemia.

Endothelial microvascular function was determined by recording the flux on the forearm before and after a 5-min occlusion period to provoke shear stress-mediated reactive hyperemia (10). Occlusion was induced by a forearm cuff placed immediately distal to the medial epicondyle that was inflated to 250 mmHg for 5 min. All variables related to this protocol are defined with the subscript PORH.

Iontophoresis of acetylcholine.

Endothelial-dependent dilation was also evaluated through iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) by filling a ventral chamber (MIC-ION1R-P1; Moor Instruments) distal to the occlusion cuff with 0.2 ml of 2% ACh solution (purity >99% TLC; Sigma-Aldrich). Electrode (cathode) and chamber (anode) were connected to a battery-powered iontophoresis controller (MIC2; Moor Instruments). After a baseline recording, ACh was delivered using an anodal current of 100 μA for 20 s and repeated for a total of seven times with 60-s intervals in between doses. Total electric charge (mC) was calculated by the relation between electric current (μA) and time (s). All variables related to this protocol are defined with the subscript ACh.

Arterial stiffness.

Arterial stiffness was determined noninvasively using the SphygmoCor XCEL system (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia). Briefly, with applanation tonometry, augmentation index (AIx) was determined in duplicate from the left brachial artery and normalized for a heart rate of 75 beats/min (AIx75). In addition, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) was determined by simultaneously recording electrocardiographic-gated carotid and femoral artery waveforms. Collectively, these assessments of arterial stiffness were used as a marker of macrovascular health.

Endothelial function.

With a 12-MHz linear transducer, simultaneous B-mode and blood velocity profiles (duplex mode) of the brachial artery were obtained (Logiq 7; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). A forearm occlusion cuff (D. E. Hokanson, Bellevue, WA), placed immediately distal to the medial epicondyle, was rapidly inflated to 250 mmHg for 5 minu (E-20 rapid cuff inflator; D.E. Hokanson) to induce arterial occlusion and subsequent reactive hyperemia of the brachial artery (60). R-wave gaiting (Accusync 72; Accusync Medical Research Corporation, Milford, CT) was used to capture end-diastolic arterial diameters for automated offline analysis of brachial artery vasodilation (Medical Imaging Applications, Coralville, IA). Peak diameter was determined by the highest 5-s average following cuff release. Shear rate was calculated as follows: shear rate = mean blood velocity × 8/vessel diameter (60). Cumulative shear rate [area under the curve (AUC)] was also calculated based on the trapezoidal rule, every 4 s for the first 20 s following cuff release, and for the rest of the data collection period, every 5 s (20). FMD is expressed as the percent increase in peak diameter from baseline diameter and also normalized by shear and expressed as FMD/shear (20).

Statistical analysis.

The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and expressed as means ± SE unless otherwise noted. For all statistical analyses, significance was set at P < 0.05. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze the normality of the measurement distribution. Group differences between participants (LowCS vs. HighCS) were determined by independent group t-tests when normality was met or Mann-Whitney U-tests when normality was not met. The response to the incremental charge of ACh through iontophoresis was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (group by time). Results were also controlled by potential cofounding variables, including blood pressure, lipid panel, body mass index during both adulthood and childhood, and HbA1c. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationships between Sirt1 and microvascular function and between Sirt1 concentrations during childhood and adulthood. Effect size calculations using Cohen’s d were reported for primary outcomes to represent small (Cohen’s d = 0.2), medium (Cohen’s d = 0.5), and large (Cohen’s d = 0.8) effect sizes (6, 32).

RESULTS

Participant characteristics and clinical laboratory values.

Demographic characteristics and laboratory values for participants in the LowCS and HighCS groups are presented in Table 1. No differences in subject demographics and body composition were observed between participants from both groups. Similarly, no differences were identified in the clinical laboratory results between both groups, with the exception of HDL concentrations, which were significantly (P = 0.044) higher in the LowCS group. Glucose, liver panel, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were also similar between groups and all within normal limits. In addition, no differences (P ≥ 0.296) were observed in the hemodynamic variables with similar heart rate and blood pressure between individuals from both groups.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics and laboratory values

Variable Low CS High CS P Value
n 16 18
Sex, men/women 7/9 12/6 0.190
Race, C/AA 7/9 10/8 0.507
Childhood
    Age, yr 15 ± 2 16 ± 3 0.528
    Height, cm 164 ± 12 169 ± 8 0.358
    Weight, kg 67 ± 20 70 ± 16 0.755
    BMI, kg/m2 24.8 ± 4.7 24.5 ± 4.5 0.966
Adulthood
    Age, yr 33 ± 2 3 ± 3 0.228
    Height, cm 170 ± 12 175 ± 6 0.387
    Weight, kg 81 ± 22 87 ± 19 0.389
    BMI, kg/m2 27.9 ± 5.9 28.5 ± 5.9 0.564
    Waist-to-hip ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2 0.456
    Body fat, % 35 ± 10 33 ± 11 0.669
    Heart rate, beats/min 65 ± 14 66 ± 7 0.841
    SBP, mmHg 118 ± 7 120 ± 8 0.422
    DBP, mmHg 74 ± 6 76 ± 6 0.296
    MAP, mmHg 89 ± 6 91 ± 6 0.299
    PP, mmHg 44 ± 4 45 ± 8 0.407
    TC, mg/dL 178 ± 23 174 ± 35 0.721
    HDL, mg/dL 59 ± 16 48 ± 13 0.029
    LDL, mg/dL 100 ± 29 104 ± 32 0.681
    TRIG, mg/dL 99 ± 40 112 ± 69 0.557
    TC-to-HDL ratio 3.3 ± 0.9 3.9 ± 1.0 0.104
    GLU, mg/dL 91 ± 6 98 ± 18 0.206
    HbA1c, % 5.4 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.3 0.166
    hsCRP, mg/L 1.9 ± 1.5 1.8 ± 1.7 0.931
    Hb, g/dL 14.3 ± 1.9 15.4 ± 2.6 0.215
    Hct, % 41 ± 8 45 ± 7 0.052
    AST, IU/L 19 ± 4 22 ± 8 0.250
    ALT, IU/L 17 ± 9 24 ± 14 0.166

Values are means ± SD; boldfaced value indicates statistical significance. AA, African American; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; BMI, body mass index; C, Caucasian; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GLU, glucose; Hb, hemoglobin; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; Hct, hematocrit; HDL, high-density lipoproteins; HighCS, high childhood sirtuin 1 (Sirt1); hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; LowCS, low childhood Sirt1; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TRIG, triglycerides.

Concentrations of Sirt1.

A strong, significant (P < 0.001) correlation was identified between concentrations of Sirt1 during childhood and adulthood (r = 0.793; Fig. 1), inferring that the storage of prior samples did not affect the concentration of Sirt1. Notably, childhood concentrations of Sirt1 were significantly (P = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.21) lower in the LowCS compared with the HighCS group (2.4 ± 0.1 vs. 4.8 ± 0.5 ng/mL, respectively). In addition, both LowCS and HighCS exhibited a similar reduction in Sirt1 when comparing values from childhood to adulthood (ΔSirt1 = 0.3 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.612). Furthermore, concentrations of Sirt1, both at early ages and later in life, tended to be negatively associated with the inflammatory marker hsCRP (childhood: r = −0.313, P = 0.071; adulthood: r = −0.319, P = 0.065).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Circulating concentrations of sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) in all of the participants during their childhood (16 ± 3 yr) and adulthood (34 ± 3 yr). Differences were identified using Pearson’s correlations; n = 34. LowCS, low childhood Sirt1 (○); HighCS, high childhood Sirt1 (gray circles).

Cutaneous microvascular function.

Red blood cell flux and CVC data for all three microvascular reactivity tests are presented in Table 2. Notably, no differences (P = 0.725) in skin resistance were identified between groups (LowCS: 160.349 ± 62.031 Ω vs. HighCS: 147.586 ± 68.553 Ω).

Table 2.

Microvascular function during the 3 reactive protocols

Variable LowCS HighCS P Value
LTH
    Baseline, PU 10 ± 1 9 ± 1 0.479
    Peak, PU 152 ± 9 186 ± 15 0.069
    Area, PU/s 181,489 ± 14,931 224,820 ± 13,341 0.037
    Baseline, PU/mmHg 0.10 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.02 0.206
    Peak, PU/mmHg 1.75 ± 0.12 2.14 ± 0.16 0.044
    TTP, s 1381 ± 20 1338 ± 19 0.138
PORH
    Baseline, PU 8 ± 1 8 ± 1 0.458
    Peak, PU 37 ± 3 49 ± 6 0.097
    Area, PU/s 3,470 ± 298 4,797 ± 415 0.012
    Baseline, PU/mmHg 0.10 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.578
    Peak, PU/mmHg 0.52 ± 0.05 0.74 ± 0.09 0.045
    TTP, s 29 ± 3 29 ± 4 0.950
Iontophoresis with ACh
    Baseline, PU 9 ± 2 10 ± 1 0.487
    Peak, PU 54 ± 7 75 ± 8 0.066
    Area, PU/s 46,570 ± 5,390 59,758 ± 3,578 0.044
    Baseline, PU/mmHg 0.10 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.01 0.462
    Peak, PU/mmHg 0.54 ± 0.08 0.87 ± 0.09 0.003
    TTP, s 15 ± 2 16 ± 1 0.730

Values are means ± SE. Boldfaced values indicate statistical significance. ACh, acetylcholine; AUC, area under the curve; HighCS, high childhood sirtuin 1; LowCS, low childhood sirtuin 1; LTH, local thermal hyperemia; PORH, post-occlusive reactive hyperemia; PU, perfusion units; TTP, time to peak.

Local thermal hyperemia.

Baseline RBF and CVC were similar (P ≥ 0.206) between groups for the LTH reactivity test. Likewise, both groups show a comparable initial peak in response to local heating (RBF, P = 0.627; CVC, P = 0.610). However, during the plateau phase, the LowCS group exhibited a significantly (P = 0.037, Cohen’s d = 0.66) attenuated RBF response and a blunted (P = 0.044, Cohen’s d = 1.14) maximal response (CVC; Fig. 2A) to the thermal provocation when compared with the HighCS group. Similar results (P ≤ 0.044) of maximal response during the thermal protocol were observed after controlling for potential factors that may impact microvascular function, including blood pressure, lipids, HbA1c, and BMI.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Microvascular function assessment in low childhood sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) (LowCS; ○) and high childhood Sirt1 (HighCS; gray circles) during 3 reactivity tests. A: maximal (max) response during local thermal hyperemia (LTH). B: maximal response during post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH). C: cumulative charge response to iontophoresis with acetylcholine (ACh). D: maximal response during iontophoresis with ACh. Group differences were determined by independent group t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests, and the response to the incremental charge of ACh through iontophoresis was analyzed by a 2-way ANOVA (group by time); n = 34. CVC, cutaneous vascular conductance; mC, miliCoulombs; PU, perfusion units. *P < 0.05 vs. LowCS.

Post-occlusive reactive hyperemia.

Baseline RBF and CVC were similar between groups (P ≥ 0.458) during the PORH test. However, the HighCS group showed an overall (P = 0.012; Cohen’s d = 1.17) greater hyperemic response to shear stress compared with the LowCS group. A similar response was also observed in the peak CVC (P = 0.045, Cohen’s d = 0.92). In addition, Fig. 2B illustrates the significantly lower (P = 0.023, Cohen’s d = 1.01) maximal CVC hyperemic response (%CVCmax) in the LowCS when compared with the HighCS (31 ± 3 vs. 43 ± 4% CVCmax, respectively). Results were similar (P ≤ 0.044) after controlling for biological covariate factors.

Iontophoresis of acetylcholine.

Consistent with the PORH data, no changes (P ≥ 0.462) in baseline RBF or CVC were observed during iontophoresis with ACh. However, individuals from the LowCS group exhibited an overall (P = 0.044, Cohen’s d = 0.63) diminished response to ACh that was also evident after controlling for changes in blood pressure (P = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 1.08). Figure 2C illustrates the response to the iontophoresis test with ACh plotted against the cumulative current. The drug delivery resulted in a progressive increase in perfusion in individuals from both groups. However, as illustrated in Fig. 2D, a significantly (P ≥ 0.044) greater response to ACh was identified in the HighCS group when compared with the LowCS group beginning at low cumulative current (≥4 mC). Similarly, a significantly (P = 0.008, Cohen’s d = 0.92) lower maximal dilation (%CVCmax) in response to ACh was observed in the LowCS compared with the HighCS group (30 ± 4 vs. 47 ± 4%CVCmax, respectively). Similar results (P ≤ 0.021) were observed after controlling for potential factors impacting microvascular dilation.

Arterial stiffness.

No statistical differences (P ≥ 0.428) in the arterial tonometry assessments for either AIx (18 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 3%, respectively) or adjusted AIx75 (16 ± 3 vs.17 ± 3, respectively) were observed between LowCS and HighCS. Similarly, no differences (P = 0.195) were identified in cfPWV (5.3 ± 0.6 vs. 6.2 ± 0.4, respectively) assessment between LowCS and HighCS groups.

Endothelial function.

No differences (P ≥ 0.857) were observed in the diameter of the brachial artery at baseline between the LowCS and the HighCS groups (3.31 ± 0.33 vs. 3.38 ± 0.22 cm, respectively). Although not statistically significant (P = 0.071), FMD tended to be higher in the HighCS group compared with the LowCS (8.3 ± 0.8 vs. 6.2 ± 0.7%), even when FMD was normalized for shear stress (0.17 ± 0.02 vs. 0.13 ± 0.02%/s, AUC respectively, P = 0.063).

Relationships between Sirt1 and microvascular function.

Significant correlations were identified between all microvascular function reactivity tests and Sirt1 concentrations. Specifically, childhood concentrations of Sirt1 were positively associated with maximal hyperemic responses to LTH (r = 0.596, P < 0.001; Fig. 3A), PORH (r = 0.367, P = 0.004; Fig. 3B), and iontophoresis with ACh (r = 0.450, P = 0.008; Fig. 3C). Similarly, concentrations of Sirt1 during adulthood were also positively associated with the responses to LTH (r = 0.458, P = 0.006), PORH (r = 0.347, P = 0.044), and iontophoresis with ACh (r = 0.412, P = 0.016).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Relationship between concentrations of sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) during childhood and microvascular function assessed during adulthood through maximal response to local thermal hyperemia (LTH; A), maximal response to post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (B), and maximal response to iontophoresis with acetylcholine (ACh; C). Differences were identified using Pearson’s correlations coefficients; n = 34. LowCS, low childhood Sirt1 (○); HighCS, high childhood Sirt1 (gray circles). CVC, cutaneous vascular conductance; PU, perfusion units.

DISCUSSION

With a longitudinal cohort, novel observations from the present study demonstrate that concentrations of Sirt1 during childhood are positively associated with microvascular function later in life. Specifically, individuals that had lower Sirt1 early in life exhibit premature microvascular dysfunction and may be at higher risk to develop CVD. These results provide experimental evidence that Sirt1 may play an important role in microvascular function with age and represent a potential therapeutic target to prevent premature vascular dysfunction.

Sirt1 and cardiovascular protection.

Sirt1 has emerged as a regulator of critical biological functions that delay the aging phenotype (8, 38, 67) and protect the development of multiple disorders (63). Indeed, dysregulation of Sirt1 has been associated with many age-related diseases, including CVD (11, 54), diabetes (49), and neurodegenerative syndromes (17). Thus, the evaluation of this protein throughout the lifespan and its relationship with cardiovascular health seems to be a crucial area to be investigated. However, minimal information is available in humans, with the majority of the data completed either in vitro (64, 73) or using animal (37, 47, 55) studies.

Results from our longitudinal cohort reveal that concentrations of Sirt1 during childhood are significantly associated with concentrations of Sirt1 later in life. Sirt1 is known to be degraded by multiple environmental factors and lifestyle choices, including poor diet, physical inactivity, environmental pollutants, or psychological stress, among others (18). Although we cannot rule out the specific contribution that these factors exert in our participants during the 17 yr between samples, our results support that Sirt1 followed a progressive decrease with the aging process in both groups. Given the reliance between Sirt1 and protection against the development of chronic diseases, these results have high clinical relevance, since the preservation of Sirt1 during early years may protect the individual from the development of premature age-related disorders (74). Although not statistically significant, our data also suggest a potential association between lower Sirt1 during both childhood and adulthood and greater expression of a clinical marker of inflammation (hsCRP). Following traditional criteria of stratification (19), 63% of individuals from the LowCS group were at moderate (hsCRP = 1–3 mg/L) or high (hsCRP > 3 mg/L) risk to develop cardiovascular diseases versus the 39% of the participants from the HighCS group. Although these results may support the cardioprotective role of Sirt1, they should be interpreted with caution. Further exploration will be needed to draw more concrete conclusions.

Sirt1 and microvascular function.

The cutaneous microcirculation represents an accessible tissue that serves as a model of generalized microvascular function. As in other vascular beds, microvasculature endothelial dysfunction is one of the earliest indicators of senescence and/or disease and is predictive of future cardiovascular events (27). Abundant literature has also described that the dysregulation of Sirt1 is associated with endothelial dysfunction and subsequent premature vascular dysfunction (4, 13, 75). Results from the present study provide further understanding of previous observations with novel information about the association between Sirt1 during childhood and microvascular function later in life. Notably, our findings suggest that those individuals with lower Sirt1 at early ages exhibit a premature microvascular dysfunction during young adulthood, which may increase the risk to develop CVD. It is important to note that senescence and disease impact both macro- and microvasculature; however, microvascular health has been proposed to be a stronger predictor of long-term outcomes and cardiovascular events compared with the health of larger vessels (43, 68). Our results support this notion since our apparently healthy cohort already exhibits a reduced microvascular dysfunction and a trend toward lower conduit vascular function. Thus, results from the present study may have high clinical relevance and identify a relationship between Sirt1 during childhood and cardiovascular health later in life.

As is true with larger vascular beds, a reduction in endothelial-derived dilators, including NO, negatively affects the functionality of the microvessels (27). In the present study, we evaluated endothelial-dependent vasodilation in the microvasculature using three different reactivity tests. Importantly, the findings of each of these tests were consistent with each other and suggest that lower Sirt1 during childhood is associated with a reduced endothelial-dependent microvascular dilation during adulthood. Indeed, different mechanisms regulate the different responses to the reactivity provocation (44, 45). For example, NO has a predominant role in the maximal dilatory response to thermal provocation (3, 50). The blood flow response to an increase in shear stress is also associated with NO synthesis and with an increase in Sirt1 (5). In addition, iontophoresis of ACh triggers the synthesis and the release of NO, prostaglandins, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors, causing relaxation of the surrounding smooth muscle (46, 52). Considering that Sirt1 promotes NO synthesis (44, 53) and activates the AMP kinase pathway promoting vasodilatation by releasing other vasodilators (14, 78), it is not surprising that the responses to the three reactivity tests were all diminished in those individuals who exhibited lower Sirt1 during childhood.

Finally, it is worth noting that individuals from both groups exhibited a similar time response to elicit vasodilation during the different reactivity tests. These findings may suggest that the neuromuscular and metabolic mechanisms involved in the microvascular response are still preserved in both groups. These results are not surprising since our cohort comprises young and seemingly healthy individuals that have not yet developed structural changes (22, 57, 66). This hypothesis is also confirmed by the arterial stiffness values that were not only similar between groups but also all within healthy ranges (12, 58). Our results are in line with previous observations that emphasize the predictive role that microvascular function has as an early marker of cardiovascular disease (27). In addition, present findings support the use of Sirt1 early in life as a potential therapeutic target to not only prevent microvascular deterioration but also reduce CVD risk later in life.

Experimental considerations.

Sirt1 has recently emerged as a promising mediator associated with multiple health benefits. Although the data from the present study also support the cardioprotective role of Sirt1, there are some experimental considerations that should be noted when interpreting these results. Sirt1 was originally described as a nuclear protein. However, it shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm in response to divergent extracellular stimuli (71). Interestingly, Sirt1 has been measured in circulation (30, 39, 41, 72), although its precise origin and its relationship to tissue content have yet to be completely elucidated. A possibility is that Sirt1 is secreted as part of extracellular vesicles, which is not surprising considering that proteins packaged into these vesicles are part of the mechanisms of biogenesis, and Sirt1 has a critical role in exosome secretion and lysosome function (3335, 45). This hypothesis has been supported by previous experiments that demonstrated the presence of another sirtuin in exosomes from oligodendroglial cells (16). Importantly, this theory will support prevailing results in the literature that describe reduced circulating Sirt1 in different physiological and disease conditions [i.e., aging (76), frailty (31), obesity (42), Alzheimer’s disease (30), or COPD (7)], since exosome secretion is also decreased during pathological processes (21, 62). Unfortunately, the lack of enough samples from our participants does not allow us to fully explore the analysis of extracellular vesicles in our cohort.

Conclusion.

In conclusion, the findings of the present study provide new insight into the relationship among Sirt1, microvascular function, and cardiovascular health in humans. Our results suggest that individuals with reduced Sirt1 during childhood may exhibit a premature microvascular dysfunction during early adulthood. The impairments in microvascular function and reductions in endothelial-dependent mechanisms observed in the present study expand previous findings that support the role of Sirt1 in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. These results provide evidence that Sirt1 may play a critical role in microvascular protection and may have therapeutic potential for the treatment and prevention of CVD later in life.

GRANTS

This work was supported in part by American Heart Association Grants 16POST31080031 and 19CDA34660318 (to P.R.-M.) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant P01-HL-06999 (to J.S.P., G.H., and R.A.H.).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

P.R.-M., G.H., J.S.P., and R.A.H. conceived and designed research; P.R.-M. and J.L. performed experiments; P.R.-M. and J.T. analyzed data; P.R.-M. and R.A.H. interpreted results of experiments; P.R.-M. prepared figures; P.R.-M. and R.A.H. drafted manuscript; P.R.-M., J.L., J.T., G.H., J.S.P., and R.A.H. edited and revised manuscript; P.R.-M., J.L., J.T., G.H., J.S.P., and R.A.H. approved final version of manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all of the volunteers that were part of the Augusta Heart Study for commitment to this research investigation. We also acknowledge the dedicated researchers of the Georgia Prevention Institute for the data collection and diligent maintenance of this longitudinal cohort.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bartoli-Leonard F, Wilkinson FL, Schiro A, Inglott FS, Alexander MY, Weston R. Suppression of SIRT1 in diabetic conditions induces osteogenic differentiation of human vascular smooth muscle cells via RUNX2 signalling. Sci Rep 9: 878, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37027-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Breitenstein A, Stein S, Holy EW, Camici GG, Lohmann C, Akhmedov A, Spescha R, Elliott PJ, Westphal CH, Matter CM, Lüscher TF, Tanner FC. Sirt1 inhibition promotes in vivo arterial thrombosis and tissue factor expression in stimulated cells. Cardiovasc Res 89: 464–472, 2011. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brunt VE, Minson CT. Cutaneous thermal hyperemia: more than skin deep. J Appl Physiol (1985) 111: 5–7, 2011. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen HZ, Wang F, Gao P, Pei JF, Liu Y, Xu TT, Tang X, Fu WY, Lu J, Yan YF, Wang XM, Han L, Zhang ZQ, Zhang R, Zou MH, Liu DP. Age-associated sirtuin 1 reduction in vascular smooth muscle links vascular senescence and inflammation to abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circ Res 119: 1076–1088, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen Z, Peng IC, Cui X, Li YS, Chien S, Shyy JY. Shear stress, SIRT1, and vascular homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 10268–10273, 2010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003833107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educ Psychol Meas 33: 107–112, 1973. doi: 10.1177/001316447303300111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conti V, Corbi G, Manzo V, Malangone P, Vitale C, Maglio A, Cotugno R, Capaccio D, Marino L, Selleri C, Stellato C, Filippelli A, Vatrella A. SIRT1 activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlates with altered lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018: 1–8, 2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/9391261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Conti V, Corbi G, Simeon V, Russomanno G, Manzo V, Ferrara N, Filippelli A. Aging-related changes in oxidative stress response of human endothelial cells. Aging Clin Exp Res 27: 547–553, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0357-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coulon P, Constans J, Gosse P. Impairment of skin blood flow during post-occlusive reactive hyperhemy assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry correlates with renal resistive index. J Hum Hypertens 26: 56–63, 2012. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cracowski JL, Roustit M. Current methods to assess human cutaneous blood flow: an updated focus on laser-based-techniques. Microcirculation 23: 337–344, 2016. doi: 10.1111/micc.12257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.D’Onofrio N, Servillo L, Balestrieri ML. SIRT1 and SIRT6 Signaling pathways in cardiovascular disease protection. Antioxid Redox Signal 28: 711–732, 2018. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Díaz A, Galli C, Tringler M, Ramírez A, Cabrera Fischer EI. Reference values of pulse wave velocity in healthy people from an urban and rural argentinean population. Int J Hypertens 2014: 1–7, 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/653239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Donato AJ, Magerko KA, Lawson BR, Durrant JR, Lesniewski LA, Seals DR. SIRT-1 and vascular endothelial dysfunction with ageing in mice and humans. J Physiol 589: 4545–4554, 2011. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Enkhjargal B, Godo S, Sawada A, Suvd N, Saito H, Noda K, Satoh K, Shimokawa H. Endothelial AMP-activated protein kinase regulates blood pressure and coronary flow responses through hyperpolarization mechanism in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34: 1505–1513, 2014. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fiore D, Gianfrilli D, Giannetta E, Galea N, Panio G, di Dato C, Pofi R, Pozza C, Sbardella E, Carbone I, Naro F, Lenzi A, Venneri MA, Isidori AM. PDE5 Inhibition Ameliorates Visceral Adiposity Targeting the miR-22/SIRT1 Pathway: Evidence From the CECSID Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101: 1525–1534, 2016. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-4252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frühbeis C, Fröhlich D, Kuo WP, Amphornrat J, Thilemann S, Saab AS, Kirchhoff F, Möbius W, Goebbels S, Nave KA, Schneider A, Simons M, Klugmann M, Trotter J, Krämer-Albers EM. Neurotransmitter-triggered transfer of exosomes mediates oligodendrocyte-neuron communication. PLoS Biol 11: e1001604, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Godoy JA, Rios JA, Zolezzi JM, Braidy N, Inestrosa NC. Signaling pathway cross talk in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Commun Signal 12: 23, 2014. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-12-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grabowska W, Sikora E, Bielak-Zmijewska A. Sirtuins, a promising target in slowing down the ageing process. Biogerontology 18: 447–476, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10522-017-9685-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grundy SM, Hansen B, Smith SC Jr, Cleeman JI, Kahn RA; American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Diabetes Association . Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Circulation 109: 551–556, 2004. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112379.88385.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harris RA, Nishiyama SK, Wray DW, Richardson RS. Ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilation. Hypertension 55: 1075–1085, 2010. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.150821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci 75: 193–208, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2595-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hodges GJ, Mueller MC, Cheung SS, Falk B. Cutaneous vasomotor responses in boys and men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 43: 1019–1026, 2018. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Holowatz LA, Thompson-Torgerson CS, Kenney WL. The human cutaneous circulation as a model of generalized microvascular function. J Appl Physiol (1985) 105: 370–372, 2008. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00858.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jung F, Pindur G, Ohlmann P, Spitzer G, Sternitzky R, Franke RP, Leithäuser B, Wolf S, Park JW. Microcirculation in hypertensive patients. Biorheology 50: 241–255, 2013. doi: 10.3233/BIR-130645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kapuku G, Ghosh S, Hall P, Strong W, Treiber F, Pollock D, Pollock J, Harris R, Halbert. The Augusta Heart Study. J Environ Health Sci 5: 15–23, 2019. doi: 10.15436/2378-6841.19.2039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kapuku GK, Treiber FA, Davis HC, Harshfield GA, Cook BB, Mensah GA. Hemodynamic function at rest, during acute stress, and in the field: predictors of cardiac structure and function 2 years later in youth. Hypertension 34: 1026–1031, 1999. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.34.5.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kenney WL. Edward F. Adolph Distinguished Lecture: Skin-deep insights into vascular aging. J Appl Physiol (1985) 123: 1024–1038, 2017. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00589.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khan F, Patterson D, Belch JJ, Hirata K, Lang CC. Relationship between peripheral and coronary function using laser Doppler imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Clin Sci (Lond) 115: 295–300, 2008. doi: 10.1042/CS20070431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kruger A, Stewart J, Sahityani R, O’Riordan E, Thompson C, Adler S, Garrick R, Vallance P, Goligorsky MS. Laser Doppler flowmetry detection of endothelial dysfunction in end-stage renal disease patients: correlation with cardiovascular risk. Kidney Int 70: 157–164, 2006. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar R, Chaterjee P, Sharma PK, Singh AK, Gupta A, Gill K, Tripathi M, Dey AB, Dey S. Sirtuin1: a promising serum protein marker for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 8: e61560, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar R, Mohan N, Upadhyay AD, Singh AP, Sahu V, Dwivedi S, Dey AB, Dey S. Identification of serum sirtuins as novel noninvasive protein markers for frailty. Aging Cell 13: 975–980, 2014. doi: 10.1111/acel.12260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 4: 863, 2013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Latifkar A, Ling L, Hingorani A, Johansen E, Clement A, Zhang X, Hartman J, Fischbach C, Lin H, Cerione RA, Antonyak MA. Loss of sirtuin 1 alters the secretome of breast cancer cells by impairing lysosomal integrity. Dev Cell 49: 393–408.e7, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee BR, Sanstrum BJ, Liu Y, Kwon SH. Distinct role of Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) in inhibiting cargo-loading and release of extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep 9: 20049, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56635-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li F, Li H, Jin X, Zhang Y, Kang X, Zhang Z, Xu M, Qian Z, Ma Z, Gao X, Zhao L, Wu S, Sun H. Adipose-specific knockdown of Sirt1 results in obesity and insulin resistance by promoting exosomes release. Cell Cycle 18: 2067–2082, 2019. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1638694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liew G, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Wong TY, Hsu W, Lee ML, Wainwright A, Wang JJ. Fractal analysis of retinal microvasculature and coronary heart disease mortality. Eur Heart J 32: 422–429, 2011. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lim JH, Kim EN, Kim MY, Chung S, Shin SJ, Kim HW, Yang CW, Kim YS, Chang YS, Park CW, Choi BS. Age-associated molecular changes in the kidney in aged mice. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012: 1–10, 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/171383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Longo VD, Kennedy BK. Sirtuins in aging and age-related disease. Cell 126: 257–268, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mansur AP, Roggerio A, Goes MF, Avakian SD, Leal DP, Maranhão RC, Strunz CM. Serum concentrations and gene expression of sirtuin 1 in healthy and slightly overweight subjects after caloric restriction or resveratrol supplementation: A randomized trial. Int J Cardiol 227: 788–794, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mariani S, di Giorgio MR, Martini P, Persichetti A, Barbaro G, Basciani S, Contini S, Poggiogalle E, Sarnicola A, Genco A, Lubrano C, Rosano A, Donini LM, Lenzi A, Gnessi L. Inverse Association of Circulating SIRT1 and Adiposity: A Study on Underweight, Normal Weight, and Obese Patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9: 449, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mariani S, Fiore D, Basciani S, Persichetti A, Contini S, Lubrano C, Salvatori L, Lenzi A, Gnessi L. Plasma levels of SIRT1 associate with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obese patients. Endocrine 49: 711–716, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0465-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mariani S, Fiore D, Persichetti A, Basciani S, Lubrano C, Poggiogalle E, Genco A, Donini LM, Gnessi L. Circulating SIRT1 increases after intragastric balloon fat loss in obese patients. Obes Surg 26: 1215–1220, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1859-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Matsuda J, Murai T, Kanaji Y, Usui E, Araki M, Niida T, Ichijyo S, Hamaya R, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Isobe M, Kakuta T. Prevalence and clinical significance of discordant changes in fractional and coronary flow reserve after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 5: e004400, 2016. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mattagajasingh I, Kim CS, Naqvi A, Yamamori T, Hoffman TA, Jung SB, DeRicco J, Kasuno K, Irani K. SIRT1 promotes endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 14855–14860, 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704329104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McAndrews KM, LeBleu VS, Kalluri R. SIRT1 Regulates Lysosome Function and Exosome Secretion. Dev Cell 49: 302–303, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Medow MS, Glover JL, Stewart JM. Nitric oxide and prostaglandin inhibition during acetylcholine-mediated cutaneous vasodilation in humans. Microcirculation 15: 569–579, 2008. doi: 10.1080/10739680802091526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mercken EM, Hu J, Krzysik-Walker S, Wei M, Li Y, McBurney MW, de Cabo R, Longo VD. SIRT1 but not its increased expression is essential for lifespan extension in caloric-restricted mice. Aging Cell 13: 193–196, 2014. doi: 10.1111/acel.12151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Merk HF. [Geriatric dermatopharmacology]. Z Hautkr 64: 1015–1018, 1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Milne JC, Lambert PD, Schenk S, Carney DP, Smith JJ, Gagne DJ, Jin L, Boss O, Perni RB, Vu CB, Bemis JE, Xie R, Disch JS, Ng PY, Nunes JJ, Lynch AV, Yang H, Galonek H, Israelian K, Choy W, Iffland A, Lavu S, Medvedik O, Sinclair DA, Olefsky JM, Jirousek MR, Elliott PJ, Westphal CH. Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nature 450: 712–716, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nature06261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Minson CT. Thermal provocation to evaluate microvascular reactivity in human skin. J Appl Physiol (1985) 109: 1239–1246, 2010. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00414.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nadtochiy SM, Yao H, McBurney MW, Gu W, Guarente L, Rahman I, Brookes PS. SIRT1-mediated acute cardioprotection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H1506–H1512, 2011. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00587.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Noon JP, Walker BR, Hand MF, Webb DJ. Studies with iontophoretic administration of drugs to human dermal vessels in vivo: cholinergic vasodilatation is mediated by dilator prostanoids rather than nitric oxide. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45: 545–550, 1998. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00718.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ota H, Eto M, Kano MR, Kahyo T, Setou M, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Akishita M, Ouchi Y. Induction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, SIRT1, and catalase by statins inhibits endothelial senescence through the Akt pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30: 2205–2211, 2010. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.210500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pillai VB, Sundaresan NR, Gupta MP. Regulation of Akt signaling by sirtuins: its implication in cardiac hypertrophy and aging. Circ Res 114: 368–378, 2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Quintas A, de Solís AJ, Díez-Guerra FJ, Carrascosa JM, Bogónez E. Age-associated decrease of SIRT1 expression in rat hippocampus: prevention by late onset caloric restriction. Exp Gerontol 47: 198–201, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2011.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rahman I, Kinnula VL, Gorbunova V, Yao H. SIRT1 as a therapeutic target in inflammaging of the pulmonary disease. Prev Med 54, Suppl: S20–S28, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rasool AH, Abdul Rahman AS, Abd Ghaffar NA, Nik Mahmood NM, Wong AR. Abnormal microvascular reactivity with hypercholesterolaemia in pregnancy. Malays J Med Sci 17: 14–19, 2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness’ Collaboration Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 31: 2338–2350, 2010. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.IJzerman RG, de Jongh RT, Beijk MA, van Weissenbruch MM, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Serné EH, Stehouwer CD. Individuals at increased coronary heart disease risk are characterized by an impaired microvascular function in skin. Eur J Clin Invest 33: 536–542, 2003. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rodriguez-Miguelez P, Seigler N, Harris RA. Ultrasound assessment of endothelial function: a technical guideline of the flow-mediated dilation test. J Vis Exp (110): 54011, 2016. doi: 10.3791/54011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Roustit M, Cracowski JL. Non-invasive assessment of skin microvascular function in humans: an insight into methods. Microcirculation 19: 47–64, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2011.00129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Saeedi S, Israel S, Nagy C, Turecki G. The emerging role of exosomes in mental disorders. Transl Psychiatry 9: 122, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0459-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Satoh A, Brace CS, Rensing N, Cliften P, Wozniak DF, Herzog ED, Yamada KA, Imai S. Sirt1 extends life span and delays aging in mice through the regulation of Nk2 homeobox 1 in the DMH and LH. Cell Metab 18: 416–430, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shang L, Zhou H, Xia Y, Wang H, Gao G, Chen B, Liu Q, Shao C, Gong Y. Serum withdrawal up-regulates human SIRT1 gene expression in a p53-dependent manner. J Cell Mol Med 13: 4176–4184, 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00468.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stein S, Matter CM. Protective roles of SIRT1 in atherosclerosis. Cell Cycle 10: 640–647, 2011. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.4.14863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tur E, Politi Y, Rubinstein A. Cutaneous blood flow abnormalities in hypertriglyceridemia. J Invest Dermatol 103: 597–600, 1994. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12396925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vassallo PF, Simoncini S, Ligi I, Chateau AL, Bachelier R, Robert S, Morere J, Fernandez S, Guillet B, Marcelli M, Tellier E, Pascal A, Simeoni U, Anfosso F, Magdinier F, Dignat-George F, Sabatier F. Accelerated senescence of cord blood endothelial progenitor cells in premature neonates is driven by SIRT1 decreased expression. Blood 123: 2116–2126, 2014. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-484956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Weis M, Hartmann A, Olbrich HG, Hör G, Zeiher AM. Prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve on left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation 65: 103–108, 1998. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199801150-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Winnik S, Auwerx J, Sinclair DA, Matter CM. Protective effects of sirtuins in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Eur Heart J 36: 3404–3412, 2015. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yamamoto-Suganuma R, Aso Y. Relationship between post-occlusive forearm skin reactive hyperaemia and vascular disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes–a novel index for detecting micro- and macrovascular dysfunction using laser Doppler flowmetry. Diabet Med 26: 83–88, 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yanagisawa S, Baker JR, Vuppusetty C, Koga T, Colley T, Fenwick P, Donnelly LE, Barnes PJ, Ito K. The dynamic shuttling of SIRT1 between cytoplasm and nuclei in bronchial epithelial cells by single and repeated cigarette smoke exposure. PLoS One 13: e0193921, 2018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yanagisawa S, Papaioannou AI, Papaporfyriou A, Baker JR, Vuppusetty C, Loukides S, Barnes PJ, Ito K. Decreased Serum Sirtuin-1 in COPD. Chest 152: 343–352, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yuan HF, Zhai C, Yan XL, Zhao DD, Wang JX, Zeng Q, Chen L, Nan X, He LJ, Li ST, Yue W, Pei XT. SIRT1 is required for long-term growth of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Mol Med (Berl) 90: 389–400, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0825-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yuan Y, Cruzat VF, Newsholme P, Cheng J, Chen Y, Lu Y. Regulation of SIRT1 in aging: Roles in mitochondrial function and biogenesis. Mech Ageing Dev 155: 10–21, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang QJ, Wang Z, Chen HZ, Zhou S, Zheng W, Liu G, Wei YS, Cai H, Liu DP, Liang CC. Endothelium-specific overexpression of class III deacetylase SIRT1 decreases atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Cardiovasc Res 80: 191–199, 2008. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhong Y, Chen AF, Zhao J, Gu YJ, Fu GX. Serum levels of cathepsin D, sirtuin1, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase are correlatively reduced in elderly healthy people. Aging Clin Exp Res 28: 641–645, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0472-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zordoky BN, Robertson IM, Dyck JR. Preclinical and clinical evidence for the role of resveratrol in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1852: 1155–1177, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zu Y, Liu L, Lee MY, Xu C, Liang Y, Man RY, Vanhoutte PM, Wang Y. SIRT1 promotes proliferation and prevents senescence through targeting LKB1 in primary porcine aortic endothelial cells. Circ Res 106: 1384–1393, 2010. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.215483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES