INTRODUCTION
COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in the largest pandemic in 100 years. The USA has been particularly impacted, reporting a third of the cases and a quarter of the deaths worldwide. In recent weeks, the unequal impact of COVID-19 across communities has become glaringly apparent. Data from New York and Chicago indicate that African American and Hispanic people experience disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19 infection and mortality.1, 2 Inequality may compound these disparities further through economic segregation, decreased social mobility, and lower access to medical care.3 Given that low-income individuals are more likely to be in essential occupations with a high exposure risk and have less access to healthcare, income inequality may exacerbate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.
METHODS
We examined the association between income inequality and the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. State income inequality data—as measured by the Gini index—were extracted from the 2018 American Community Survey. The number of cases and deaths was calculated using the COVID-19 Dashboard, a data set hosted by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University.4, 5 We limited our analysis to the 50 states from January 22, 2020, through April 13, 2020.
First, we performed simple correlation analyses between the state-level Gini index and the number of cases and deaths per 100,000 population due to COVID-19 using the Spearman rank-order correlation test. To account for the right-skewed distribution, we log-transformed the data on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths.
Second, using multivariable regressions, we examined the associations between the state-level Gini index and log-transformed number of cases and deaths due to COVID-19 adjusting for potential confounders. The adjustment variables included the proportion of the population 65+ years, female, African American, Hispanic, and below poverty; median household income; the number of tests performed per capita; doctors per capita (2018–2019 Area Health Resource File); beds per capita (2009–2018 American Hospital Association Annual Survey); and whether a state had a stay-at-home or shelter-in-place policy (no order, order in some parts of the state, statewide order; the New York Times database).6
This study was exempted from review by the institutional review board of UCLA.
RESULTS
On April 13, 2020, there were a total of 577,414 cases and 23,424 deaths across 50 states. The number of cases ranged from 28.7 to 1,006.2 cases per 100,000 (median. 73.0; IQR, 47.7–133.6). The mortality rates ranged from 0.17 to 51.7 deaths per 100,000 (median, 2.0; IQR, 1.2–4.5).
We observed positive correlations between the Gini index and the number of cases (correlation coefficient = 0.38; P = 0.006) and deaths (correlation coefficient = 0.44; P = 0.002) due to COVID-19 (Fig. 1). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that states with a higher Gini index experienced a larger number of deaths due to COVID-19 (adjusted percent change for one unit increase in Gini index, + 27.2%; 95%CI, + 3.5% to + 56.3%; P = 0.02); the Gini index was marginally associated with the number of COVID-19 cases (+ 13.5%; 95%CI, + 0.0% to + 30.0%; P = 0.07) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Change in the number of COVID-19 cases/deaths (95%CI) | P value | |
---|---|---|
Cases per 100,000 | + 13.5% (0.0% to + 30.0%) | 0.07 |
Deaths per 100,000 | + 27.2% (+ 3.5% to + 56.3%) | 0.02 |
*Adjusted for the following state-level variables: proportion of the population over 65 years, female, African American, Hispanic, and below poverty; median household income; the number of tests performed per capita; total doctors per capita; total beds per capita; and whether a state had a stay-at-home or shelter-in-place policy on April 1, 2020
DISCUSSION
We found that states with higher income inequality experienced a higher number of deaths due to COVID-19. These findings suggest that social factors such as income inequality may explain why some parts of the USA are hit harder by the COVID-19 pandemic than others.
Our study has limitations. First, as is the case with observational studies, there is a possibility of residual confounding, including from comorbidities. However, we included the proportion of the population 65+ years which may be a proxy of underlying health risks of the populations. Second, the use of state-level data precluded us from making any inferences about individual-level associations between inequality and COVID-19 infections.
Our findings should be informative for policymakers considering additional policies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on the most financially vulnerable.
Funding Information
Drs. Oronce and Scannell are supported by the National Clinician Scholars Program at the University of California, Los Angeles, and by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations through the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program..
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Disclaimer
The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Carlos Irwin A. Oronce, Email: coronce@mednet.ucla.edu.
Yusuke Tsugawa, Email: ytsugawa@mednet.ucla.edu.
References
- 1.Elignon J, Burch ADS, Searcey D, et al. Black Americans Face Alarming Rates of Coronavirus Infection in Some States. 7 April 2020. Accessed at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/us/coronavirus-race.html on 19 April 2020.
- 2.Thebault R, Tran AB, Williams V. African Americans are at higher risk of death from coronavirus. 7 April 2020. Accessed at https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/07/coronavirus-is-infecting-killing-black-americans-an-alarmingly-high-rate-post-analysis-shows/?arc404=true on 19 April 2020.
- 3.Bor J, Cohen GH, Galea S. Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1475–1490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30571-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases. Accessed at https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/tree/master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_daily_reports on 13 April 2020.
- 6.Mervosh S, Lu D, Swales V. See Which States and Cities Have Told Residents to Stay at Home. 20 April 2020. Accessed at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-stay-at-home-order.html on 22 April 2020.