Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
letter
. 2020 Jun 24;35(9):2791–2793. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05971-3

Association Between State-Level Income Inequality and COVID-19 Cases and Mortality in the USA

Carlos Irwin A Oronce 1,2,, Christopher A Scannell 1,2, Ichiro Kawachi 3, Yusuke Tsugawa 2,4
PMCID: PMC7313247  PMID: 32583336

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in the largest pandemic in 100 years. The USA has been particularly impacted, reporting a third of the cases and a quarter of the deaths worldwide. In recent weeks, the unequal impact of COVID-19 across communities has become glaringly apparent. Data from New York and Chicago indicate that African American and Hispanic people experience disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19 infection and mortality.1, 2 Inequality may compound these disparities further through economic segregation, decreased social mobility, and lower access to medical care.3 Given that low-income individuals are more likely to be in essential occupations with a high exposure risk and have less access to healthcare, income inequality may exacerbate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.

METHODS

We examined the association between income inequality and the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. State income inequality data—as measured by the Gini index—were extracted from the 2018 American Community Survey. The number of cases and deaths was calculated using the COVID-19 Dashboard, a data set hosted by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University.4, 5 We limited our analysis to the 50 states from January 22, 2020, through April 13, 2020.

First, we performed simple correlation analyses between the state-level Gini index and the number of cases and deaths per 100,000 population due to COVID-19 using the Spearman rank-order correlation test. To account for the right-skewed distribution, we log-transformed the data on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths.

Second, using multivariable regressions, we examined the associations between the state-level Gini index and log-transformed number of cases and deaths due to COVID-19 adjusting for potential confounders. The adjustment variables included the proportion of the population 65+ years, female, African American, Hispanic, and below poverty; median household income; the number of tests performed per capita; doctors per capita (2018–2019 Area Health Resource File); beds per capita (2009–2018 American Hospital Association Annual Survey); and whether a state had a stay-at-home or shelter-in-place policy (no order, order in some parts of the state, statewide order; the New York Times database).6

This study was exempted from review by the institutional review board of UCLA.

RESULTS

On April 13, 2020, there were a total of 577,414 cases and 23,424 deaths across 50 states. The number of cases ranged from 28.7 to 1,006.2 cases per 100,000 (median. 73.0; IQR, 47.7–133.6). The mortality rates ranged from 0.17 to 51.7 deaths per 100,000 (median, 2.0; IQR, 1.2–4.5).

We observed positive correlations between the Gini index and the number of cases (correlation coefficient = 0.38; P = 0.006) and deaths (correlation coefficient = 0.44; P = 0.002) due to COVID-19 (Fig. 1). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that states with a higher Gini index experienced a larger number of deaths due to COVID-19 (adjusted percent change for one unit increase in Gini index, + 27.2%; 95%CI, + 3.5% to + 56.3%; P = 0.02); the Gini index was marginally associated with the number of COVID-19 cases (+ 13.5%; 95%CI, + 0.0% to + 30.0%; P = 0.07) (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The unadjusted correlation between the state-level Gini index and the number of COVID-19 cases (a) and deaths (b).

Table 1.

The Adjusted Association Between the State-Level Gini Index and the Number of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths

Change in the number of COVID-19 cases/deaths (95%CI) P value
Cases per 100,000 + 13.5% (0.0% to + 30.0%) 0.07
Deaths per 100,000 + 27.2% (+ 3.5% to + 56.3%) 0.02

*Adjusted for the following state-level variables: proportion of the population over 65 years, female, African American, Hispanic, and below poverty; median household income; the number of tests performed per capita; total doctors per capita; total beds per capita; and whether a state had a stay-at-home or shelter-in-place policy on April 1, 2020

DISCUSSION

We found that states with higher income inequality experienced a higher number of deaths due to COVID-19. These findings suggest that social factors such as income inequality may explain why some parts of the USA are hit harder by the COVID-19 pandemic than others.

Our study has limitations. First, as is the case with observational studies, there is a possibility of residual confounding, including from comorbidities. However, we included the proportion of the population 65+ years which may be a proxy of underlying health risks of the populations. Second, the use of state-level data precluded us from making any inferences about individual-level associations between inequality and COVID-19 infections.

Our findings should be informative for policymakers considering additional policies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 on the most financially vulnerable.

Funding Information

Drs. Oronce and Scannell are supported by the National Clinician Scholars Program at the University of California, Los Angeles, and by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations through the VA/National Clinician Scholars Program..

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Carlos Irwin A. Oronce, Email: coronce@mednet.ucla.edu.

Yusuke Tsugawa, Email: ytsugawa@mednet.ucla.edu.

References


Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES