Skip to main content
Oman Medical Journal logoLink to Oman Medical Journal
. 2020 Jun 25;35(3):e131. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.49

Promoter Hypermethylation of Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Pathway Inhibitor WIF-1 Gene and its Association with MTHFR C677T Polymorphism in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Ahmad Jalilvand 1, Mohammad Soleiman Soltanpour 2,*
PMCID: PMC7315525  PMID: 32607254

Abstract

Objectives

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy with a high rate of mortality. The dysregulation of genes involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a common finding in cancers. Wnt-inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) suppresses the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and its inactivation by genetics and epigenetic changes may cause cancer. We investigated the DNA methylation status of the WIF-1 gene in patients with CRC and its interaction with MTHFR C677T polymorphism, a known modifier of methylation reaction.

Methods

We investigated 50 cancerous tissues and the adjacent non-cancerous tissue. Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial kit and was treated by sodium bisulfite. Methylation-specific PCR was used for methylation analysis, and restriction fragment length polymorphism PCR to analyze the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene.

Results

The frequency of WIF1 promoter DNA methylation was significantly higher in cancerous tissue than adjacent non-cancerous tissue (52.0% vs. 8.0%; p < 0.001). WIF1 promoter DNA methylation status showed a significant association only with tumor location (p = 0.009). Carriers of TT genotype and T allele of MTHFR C677T polymorphism had a significantly higher frequency of unmethylated WIF1 gene than methylated WIF-1 gene in cancerous tissue (p = 0.025 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Promoter DNA hypermethylation of the WIF-1 gene is a significant risk factor for CRC development, which was significantly associated with tumor location only. The significant association of TT genotype and T allele of MTHFR C677T polymorphism with unmethylated WIF-1 gene suggests a protective role for this common polymorphism against methylation-induced development of CRC.

Keywords: DNA Methylation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; Genotype

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. CRC represents the second or third most common cancer worldwide and is one of the five common causes of cancer in the Iranian population.1-3 Due to a rapidly progressive nature and delayed clinical manifestation, CRC represents treatment challenges in affected patients. Numerous risk factors, including genetic instability and epigenetic changes have been described in the pathogenesis of CRC.4,5 Epigenetic alterations are defined as heritable modification in the genome resulting in altered gene expression levels without causing any change in the DNA sequence. DNA methylation in CpG islands of genes is a major epigenetic change associated with gene silencing.6 The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in cell homeostasis and inappropriate activation of this signaling pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many cancers.7 Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1), a member of secreted mediators of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, acts as a direct suppressor and antagonist of this signaling pathway.8,9 Downregulation of WIF-1 gene by aberrant DNA methylation is a hallmark of various cancers and confers a more aggressive phenotype of the disease.8 Gene methylation is mediated by DNA methyltransferase enzymes and is dependent on 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5mTHF). 5mTHF acts as a one-carbon donor cofactor in various biological processes such as DNA methylation.10 Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key regulator of 5mTHF biosynthesis and reduced activity of MTHFR enzyme strongly limits the bioavailability of 5mTHF, which may affect DNA methylation.11 The C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene was reported to be associated with 70% and 35% diminished bioactivity of MTHFR enzyme in mutant homozygous and heterozygous states, respectively, which can restrict the pool of 5mTHF in cells.12,13 Our study sought to investigate the methylation status of WIF-1 gene and its interaction with MTHFR C677T polymorphism in a group of CRC patients and a control group.

Methods

The studied samples consisted of 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancerous tissue and adjacent healthy non-affected tissues obtained from patients with CRC while conducting curative surgery between September 2015 and September 2017 in Zanjan, Iran. The sample size was calculated by OpenEpi version 2.2 software (Informer Technologies, Inc. Atlanta, USA) (free online statistical software available at: www.openepi.com). The calculated sample size based on the previously reported frequency of WIF-1 methylation was 50.14 The clinical features of patients with CRC including age, sex, and pathological characteristics such as tumor location, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, lymph node metastasis, and the histological type was collected using medical records. Patients were excluded from the study if they received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Zanjan University Medical Sciences (Ethical code: ZUMS.REC.1394.337), Zanjan, Iran.

Genomic DNA was extracted from a 5–10 µm section of FFPE tissues using an FFPE DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany). The concentration and purity of extracted DNA were determined by nanodrop spectrophotometer and subsequently stored at -80 ºC. Approximately 1–2 µg of isolated DNA was treated by sodium bisulfite to convert unmethylated cytosine to uracil by an EpiTect Fast DNA Bisulfite kit (Qiagen, Germany), according to the instruction of kit. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) using two sets of specific primer for amplification of methylated and unmethylated state of the gene was used for methylation analysis, as previously described with some modification.15,16 The MSP condition included 10 µL of 2 × hot start master mix (Qiagen, Germany), 1 µL (0.5 µM) of each forward and reverse primer, 100 ng of bisulfite modified DNA, and appropriate volume of PCR grade water to a final volume of 20 µL. Methylated and unmethylated controls (EpiTect PCR Control DNA Set, Qiagen, Germany) were used in each PCR reaction. Following MSP, the amplified products were visualized on 2.5% agarose gel under UV light. The amplicon size for both the methylated and unmethylated PCR products was 199 bp.

The C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene was analyzed using the PCR - restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique. The polymorphic site was amplified using specific primer, as previously described.17 Then, 7 µL of amplified PCR product in conjunction with 5 u HinfI (Fermentas, Germany) restriction enzyme, 2 µL buffer, and 10.5 µL of PCR grade water was incubated at 37 ºC overnight. Then, the digested products were electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel. The mutant allele produces 175 bp and 23 bp bands, while the wild allele appears as an undigested 198 bp band.

Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Numerical data were expressed as mean±standard deviation and were analyzed by Student’s t-test. GraphPad Prism 8 was used for statistical analysis. A p- value of < 0.050 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of CRC patients with methylated and unmethylated WIF-1 gene in the cancerous tissue was 60.4±10.6 years and 58.3±12.6 years, respectively (p= 0.535). The size of tumor varied between 2.5 and 12 cm. Twenty-six patients (52.0%) were male while 24 (48.0%) were female. Stage III–IV were seen in 33 (66.0%) of CRC patients, while stage I–II was present in 17 (34.0%) of CRC patients. Regarding the histological type of tumor, 80.0% had the non-mucinous type, while the remaining 20.0% were the mucinous type. Left-sided tumors were seen in 27 (54.0%) patients and right-sided tumors were seen in 23 (46.0%) patients. The promoter DNA methylation of WIF-1 gene seen in cancerous tissue (52.0%) was significantly higher than that of healthy adjacent tissue (8.0%) (p < 0.001, χ2 = 260.60) [Table 1]. Considering the association between clinicopathological features of CRC patients with methylation status of WIF-1 gene, no significant association was seen for all of the tested parameters except tumor location 
[Table 2]. The frequency of promoter DNA methylation of WIF-1 was significantly higher in the left-sided tumors (20/27; 74.1%) than the right-sided tumors (8/23; 34.8%) (p = 0.009). The genotypic distribution of MTHFR C677T polymorphism between methylated and unmethylated samples indicated a high prevalence of CT and TT genotypes among unmethylated samples (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, respectively). Moreover, MTHFR C677T polymorphism showed increased frequency among unmethylated samples in the dominant (p < 0.001) but not the recessive (p = 0.307) genetic model. The T allele frequency was significantly higher in unmethylated than methylated samples (43.2% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.001) [Table 3].

Table 1. The frequency of WIF-1 methylation in tumor tissue and healthy adjacent tissue.

WIF-1 methylation status Cancerous tissue, n = 50 n (%) Healthy tissue, n = 50 n (%)
UU 22 (44.0) 46 (92.0)
UM 2 (4.0) 0 (0.0)
MM 26 (52.0) 4 (8.0)

p < 0.001; χ2 = 260.60

WIF-1: Wnt inhibitory factor-1; U: unmethylated; M: methylated.

Table 2. Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients and the Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) methylation status in the cancerous tissue.

Clinicopathological features Number
(n = 50)
WIF-1 methylation status in the cancerous tissue
Methylated
n = 28
Unmethylated
n = 22
p-value*
Age, mean ± SD, years 60.4 ± 10.6 58.3 ± 12.6 0.535**
Gender 0.166
Female/Male 24/26 16/12 8/14
Tumor size, cm 0.264
≤ 5 23 15 8
> 5 27 13 14
Grade 0.107***
I 8 5 3
II 34 16 18
III 8 7 1
Tumor location 0.009
Left-sided 27 20 7
Right-sided 23 8 15
Stage 0.999
I–II 17 10 7
III–IV 33 18 15
Histological type 0.479
Mucinous 10 7 3
Non-mucinous 40 21 19
Lymph node metastasis 0.153
Positive 25 11 14
Negative 25 17 8

*determined by Fisher’s exact test; **determined by Student’s t-test; ***determined by chi-square test.

Table 3. The association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism with the methylation status of the WIF-1 gene in patients with CRC.

MTHFR C677T polymorphism Methylated, n = 28
n (%)
Unmethylated, n = 22
n(%)
p-value OR (95% CI)
CC 22 (78.6) 6 (27.3) - Ref
CT 5 (17.9) 13 (59.1) < 0.001 9.53 (2.56–40.96)
TT 1 (03.6) 3 (13.6) 0.025 11 (1.30–14.74)
CT+TT vs. CC* 6 (21.4) 16 (72.7) < 0.001 9.77 (2.53–34.03)
TT vs. CC+ CT** 1 (03.6) 3 (13.6) 0.307 4.26 (0.58–57.08)
C allele 49 (87.5) 25 (56.8) - Ref
T allele 7 (12.5) 19 (43.2) 0.001 5.32 (1.89–13.24)

*dominant genetic model; **recessive genetic model.

WIF-1: Wnt inhibitory factor-1; CRC: colorectal cancer, OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Discussion

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways play pivotal roles in various regulatory processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and homeostasis.18 Aberrant activation of this signaling pathway may lead to uncontrolled proliferation of cells and cancer.19 The tight regulation of this signaling pathway by tumor suppressor genes is essential for cancer prevention.19 However, genetic and epigenetic changes in some tumor suppressor genes may overwhelm the tight regulation of cells leading to cancer. Also, the interaction between genetic and epigenetic alterations may affect the development of cancer. We saw a high frequency of WIF-1 gene methylation in cancerous (52.0%) tissue compared to non-cancerous (8.0%) tissue, suggesting a role for WIF-1 gene methylation in CRC development. This epigenetic change may be used as an early diagnostic biomarker for CRC patients. The reported frequency of WIF-1 gene methylation in our study (52.0%) was higher than that of a study by Samaei et al,14 (41.6%) and was lower than that of studies by Abdelmaksoud-Dammak et al,8 (87.95%), Ni et al,20 (74%) and Patai et al, (82%).21 Generally, a higher WIF-1 methylation frequency was reported in tissue-based methylation assays than serum- or stool-based assays, which may explain the heterogeneity of reported results.8,20,22 WIF-1 gene methylation was reported in 76% of CRC patients,20 63.9% of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients,23 63.3% of breast cancers,24 60% of squamous cell cervical tumors,25 and 35% of blood cancer patients.26 Altogether, these studies represent a pivotal role of WIF-1 gene methylation in carcinogenesis.

Our study found higher WIF-1 gene methylation in left-sided tumors than right-sided tumors, which may confer a tumor location-specific role for WIF-1 gene methylation in CRC pathogenesis. The possible explanation for this finding may be related to the higher age of patients with left-sided tumors relative to patients with right-sided tumors (62.5±9.7 vs. 56.3±10.6, p = 0.033). Previous studies have shown increased DNA methylation with increasing age.27 In agreement with our result, a study by Deng et al,28 indicated a correlation between DNA methylation of some tumor-specific genes and tumor location.Moreover, investigating the correlation between WIF-1 gene methylation and clinicopathological features of CRC patients identified no significant association between age, gender, tumor grade, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and tumor histological type (p > 0.050), suggesting that WIF-1 gene silencing by DNA methylation is an early event in the evolvement of CRC. This finding proposes WIF-1 DNA methylation as an early diagnostic marker not associated with the severity and progression of CRC. Similarly, Taniguchi et al,29 reported no significant association between clinical and pathological features of CRC patients and WIF-1 gene silencing by DNA methylation.

MTHFR is involved in the production of 5mTHF, an essential precursor for methylation reactions. The C677T polymorphism of MTHFR gene reduces the enzymatic activity of MTHFR by 70% and 35% in homozygous and heterozygous state, respectively.12,13 This polymorphism was shown to be associated with cancer susceptibility in numerous studies.13,30 Zhao et al,30 reported that the carrier of MTHFR C677T allele was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CRC, suggesting a protective role for minor T allele against CRC risk. Our study revealed that in carriers of the MTHFR TT and CT genotypes the frequency of unmethylated WIF-1 gene was significantly higher than in carriers of the CC genotypes. The carriage of the MTHFR TT and CT genotypes may restrict the availability of 5mTHF for methylation reaction resulting in a hypomethylated WIF-1 gene and may confer some protection against methylation-induced cancer development. This finding exhibited a modifying effect of MTHFR TT and CT genotypes on the methylation status of WIF-1 gene that may provide an explanation for the previously reported protective effect of MTHFR TT and CT genotypes on the risk of CRC.30

Our study had some limitations including that we did not evaluate the gene and protein expression of WIF-1, our study population was small, and was conducted retrospectively.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated promoter hyper-methylation of the WIF-1 gene as a significant risk factor for development but not the severity and progression of CRC. Also, MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with a hypomethylated state of WIF-1 gene in carriers of TT and CT genotypes that may explain the protective role of this common polymorphism against CRC development.

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interests. The study was supported by a grant from Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS), Deputy of Research and Technology (grant number A-12-1073-1), Zanjan, Iran.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015. Mar;136(5):E359-E386 . 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Lawati JA, Al-Zakwani I, Fadhil I, Al-Bahrani BJ. Cancer Incidence in Oman (1996-2015). Oman Med J 2019. Jul;34(4):271-273 . 10.5001/omj.2019.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kolahdoozan S, Sadjadi A, Radmard AR, Khademi H. Five common cancers in Iran. Arch Iran Med 2010. Mar;13(2):143-146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Orsetti B, Selves J, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Lasorsa L, Gordien K, Bibeau F, et al. Impact of chromosomal instability on colorectal cancer progression and outcome. BMC Cancer 2014. Feb;14:121 . 10.1186/1471-2407-14-121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grady WM, Carethers JM. Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2008. Oct;135(4):1079-1099 . 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kanwal R, Gupta K, Gupta S. Cancer epigenetics: an introduction. In: Cancer epigenetics. Humana Press, New York; 2015. p. 3-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: Update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev 2018. Jan;62:50-60 . 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abdelmaksoud-Dammak R, Miladi-Abdennadher I, Saadallah-Kallel A, Khabir A, Sellami-Boudawara T, Frikha M, et al. Downregulation of WIF-1 and Wnt5a in patients with colorectal carcinoma: clinical significance. Tumour Biol 2014. Aug;35(8):7975-7982 . 10.1007/s13277-014-2015-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rubin EM, Guo Y, Tu K, Xie J, Zi X, Hoang BH. Wnt inhibitory factor 1 decreases tumorigenesis and metastasis in osteosarcoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2010. Mar;9(3):731-741 . 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crider KS, Yang TP, Berry RJ, Bailey LB. Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate’s role. Adv Nutr 2012. Jan;3(1):21-38 . 10.3945/an.111.000992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Strickland KC, Krupenko NI, Krupenko SA. Molecular mechanisms underlying the potentially adverse effects of folate. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013. Mar;51(3):607-616 . 10.1515/cclm-2012-0561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crott JW, Mashiyama ST, Ames BN, Fenech M. The effect of folic acid deficiency and MTHFR C677T polymorphism on chromosome damage in human lymphocytes in vitro. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001. Oct;10(10):1089-1096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sazawal S, Chaubey R, Kaur P, Chikkara S, Kumar B, Bakshi S, et al. MTHFR gene polymorphisms and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and children: a case control study in India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2014. Dec;30(4):219-225 . 10.1007/s12288-013-0295-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Samaei NM, Yazdani Y, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Azadeh H, Farazmandfar T. Promoter methylation analysis of WNT/β-catenin pathway regulators and its association with expression of DNMT1 enzyme in colorectal cancer. J Biomed Sci 2014. Aug;21(1):73 . 10.1186/s12929-014-0073-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang Z, Wang Y, Fang J, Chen F, Liu J, Wu J, et al. Expression and aberrant promoter methylation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 in human astrocytomas. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010. Mar;29(1):26 . 10.1186/1756-9966-29-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee SM, Park JY, Kim DS. Wif1 hypermethylation as unfavorable prognosis of non-small cell lung cancers with EGFR mutation. Mol Cells 2013. Jul;36(1):69-73 . 10.1007/s10059-013-0060-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aly RM, Taalab MM, Ghazy HF. MTHFR A1298C and C677T gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic myeloid leukemia in Egypt. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014. Apr;7(5):2571-2578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rao TP, Kühl M. An updated overview on Wnt signaling pathways: a prelude for more. Circ Res 2010. Jun;106(12):1798-1806 . 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.219840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene 2017. Mar;36(11):1461-1473 . 10.1038/onc.2016.304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ni HB, Wang FY, Xu J, He XJ, Chen J, Wu Q, et al. Screening and identification of a tumor specific methylation phenotype in the colorectal laterally spreading tumor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017. Jun;21(11):2611-2616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Patai ÁV, Valcz G, Hollósi P, Kalmár A, Péterfia B, Patai Á, et al. Comprehensive DNA methylation analysis reveals a common ten-gene methylation signature in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. PLoS One 2015. Aug;10(8):e0133836 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0133836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amiot A, Mansour H, Baumgaertner I, Delchier JC, Tournigand C, Furet JP, et al. CRC group of Val De Marne The detection of the methylated Wif-1 gene is more accurate than a fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. PLoS One 2014. Jul;9(7):e99233 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0099233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paluszczak J, Sarbak J, Kostrzewska-Poczekaj M, Kiwerska K, Jarmuż-Szymczak M, Grenman R, et al. The negative regulators of Wnt pathway-DACH1, DKK1, and WIF1 are methylated in oral and oropharyngeal cancer and WIF1 methylation predicts shorter survival. Tumour Biol 2015. Apr;36(4):2855-2861 . 10.1007/s13277-014-2913-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Veeck J, Wild PJ, Fuchs T, Schüffler PJ, Hartmann A, Knüchel R, et al. Prognostic relevance of Wnt-inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1) and Dickkopf-3 (DKK3) promoter methylation in human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2009. Jul;9(1):217 . 10.1186/1471-2407-9-217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Delmas AL, Riggs BM, Pardo CE, Dyer LM, Darst RP, Izumchenko EG, et al. WIF1 is a frequent target for epigenetic silencing in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Carcinogenesis 2011. Nov;32(11):1625-1633 . 10.1093/carcin/bgr193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ghasemi A, Ghotazslou A, Mohammadi M, Ghaffari K, Abbasian S. Dysregulation of the WNT signaling pathway through methylation of wnt inhibitory factor 1 and dickkopf-1 genes among AML patients at the time of diagnosis. IJBC 2014;7(1):11-17. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Johansson A, Enroth S, Gyllensten U. Continuous aging of the human DNA methylome throughout the human lifespan. PLoS One 2013. Jun;8(6):e67378 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0067378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deng G, Kakar S, Tanaka H, Matsuzaki K, Miura S, Sleisenger MH, et al. Proximal and distal colorectal cancers show distinct gene-specific methylation profiles and clinical and molecular characteristics. Eur J Cancer 2008. Jun;44(9):1290-1301 . 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taniguchi H, Yamamoto H, Hirata T, Miyamoto N, Oki M, Nosho K, et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 in human gastrointestinal cancers. Oncogene 2005. Nov;24(53):7946-7952. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao M, Li X, Xing C, Zhou B. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Biomed Rep 2013. Sep;1(5):781-791 . 10.3892/br.2013.134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oman Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Oman Medical Specialty Board

RESOURCES