Table 1.
Acro-TSQ scale | Statistic | Screening N = 82 |
Baseline N = 81 |
Week 26 N = 77 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Symptom interference | Mean | 72 | 78 | 78 |
Median | 75 | 81 | 94 | |
SD | 25 | 24 | 27 | |
Range | 19–100 | 19–100 | 0–100 | |
Floor (n, %) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | |
Ceiling (n, %) | 26 (32%) | 35 (43%) | 38 (49%) | |
Treatment convenience | Mean | 67 | 68 | 70 |
Median | 67 | 71 | 71 | |
SD | 21 | 21 | 18 | |
Range | 4–100 | 17–100 | 17–100 | |
Floor (n, %) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Ceiling (n, %) | 4 (5%) | 5 (6%) | 1 (1%) | |
Injection site interferencea | Mean | 84 | 85 | |
Median | 88 | 88 | ||
SD | 20 | 18 | ||
Range | 13–100 | 38–100 | ||
Floor (n, %) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
Ceiling (n, %) | 39 (48%) | 40 (49%) | ||
GI interference | Mean | 80 | 84 | 83 |
Median | 92 | 92 | 100 | |
SD | 24 | 21 | 23 | |
Range | 0–100 | 17–100 | 25–100 | |
Floor (n, %) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Ceiling (n, %) | 37 (45%) | 39 (48%) | 41 (53%) | |
Treatment satisfaction | Mean | 61 | 61 | 58 |
Median | 61 | 61 | 61 | |
SD | 20 | 19 | 25 | |
Range | 0–100 | 14–100 | 0–100 | |
Floor (n, %) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (4%) | |
Ceiling (n, %) | 2 (2%) | 3 (4%) | 3 (4%) | |
Emotional reaction | Mean | 80 | 82 | 84 |
Median | 83 | 83 | 92 | |
SD | 22 | 20 | 21 | |
Range | 0–100 | 0–100 | 25–100 | |
Floor (n, %) | 2 (2%) | 2 (3%) | 0 (0%) | |
Ceiling (n, %) | 23 (28%) | 22 (27%) | 33 (43%) |
Floor is most symptomatic; Ceiling Least Symptomatic. Lower scores indicate greater interference/lower satisfaction; higher score indicate less interference/higher satisfaction
GI gastrointestinal, SD standard deviation
aInjection site interference scale was not administered at week 26