The recently described species Myxacorys almedinensis and two other cyanobacteria were isolated from the limestone walls of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra, Portugal (UNESCO World Heritage Site). The high-quality genome sequences presented here will be essential for characterization purposes and description of the novel taxa.
ABSTRACT
The recently described species Myxacorys almedinensis and two other cyanobacteria were isolated from the limestone walls of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra, Portugal (UNESCO World Heritage Site). The high-quality genome sequences presented here will be essential for characterization purposes and description of the novel taxa.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Epilithic and endolithic cyanobacteria are known to cause severe esthetic and physicochemical alterations to stone substrata (1–3). Due to their unique characteristics, photosynthetic nature, and ability to fix nitrogen, they are considered primary colonizers of stone monuments, contributing to future colonization by heterotrophic organisms (4, 5).
During an experimental survey aimed at fully characterizing the community of microalgae and cyanobacteria of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra, Portugal, three novel cyanobacterial taxa were isolated (6). The strain Myxacorys almedinensis coi00094076 (Synechococcales) has been recently described (7), whereas studies toward future descriptions of Nostoc sp. B (2019) and Synechococcales cyanobacterium C are currently being performed. In this article, we present the high-quality draft genome sequences of three isolated strains that were retrieved from the limestone walls of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra. The samples were collected by scraping off green/dark-green biofilms with the help of a sterile scalpel. The cyanobacterial strains were isolated from liquid BG11 enrichment cultures (8) by means of micromanipulation using an inverted microscope and inoculated into flask tubes containing the same culture medium. Inoculates were then incubated at 20 ± 1°C, under a 16:8 h (light-dark) photoperiod (30 to 40 μmol photons m−2 s−1) until they had developed enough biomass for DNA extraction (6). Genomic DNA was extracted with a DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, USA). Strain identification was performed by molecular analyses of the partial 16S rRNA gene fragments (6). For genome sequencing, libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT library prep workflow (Illumina), and 2 × 150-nucleotide (nt) paired-end reads were generated on an Illumina MiSeq instrument. The genomes were assembled using the programs encompassed in the MetaWRAP pipeline (9), namely, quality trimming was executed using the sliding-window operation in Trim Galore v0.5.0 (10) with default parameters. The final assembly was performed using the SPAdes v3.5.0 (11) assembler with default parameters and k-mer lengths of 21, 33, 55, and 77 nt. The assemblies were subjected to binning with MetaBAT v2.12.1 (12) with default parameters, and a quality check was performed on the final resulting file using CheckM v1.0.12 (13) with default parameters. The complete results regarding the genome sequencing of the three strains are detailed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Detailed data from the genome sequencing of the three strains
| Characteristic | Data for straina
: |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Myxacorys almedinensis A | Nostoc sp. B (2019) | Synechococcales cyanobacterium C | |
| Strain name according to Soares et al. (6) | Cyanobacterium sp. 5 | Cyanobacterium sp. 1 | Cyanobacterium sp. 3 |
| No. of reads | 907,006 | 2,466,854 | 2,556,453 |
| No. of contigs | 85 | 109 | 79 |
| N50 (bp) | 141,189 | 228,597 | 72,306 |
| Genome size (bp) | 4,958,574 | 7,426,239 | 4,122,371 |
| % G+C content | 49.7 | 41.8 | 52.0 |
| No. of protein coding sequences | 4,367 | 6,667 | 4,027 |
| No. of tRNAs | 38 | 88 | 42 |
| % completeness | 99.52 | 99.55 | 99.29 |
| % contamination | 0.353 | 0.444 | 0.471 |
| SRA accession no. | SRX7707471 | SRX7707472 | SRX7707473 |
| GenBank accession no. | GCA_010091945.1 | GCA_010091925.1 | GCA_009939295.1 |
NCBI strain names.
Data availability.
The data from this whole-genome sequencing project have been submitted to NCBI under the accession number PRJNA596374. This submission encompasses both the raw data and assembled data.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financed by FEDER (Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional) funds through the COMPETE 2020 Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI) and by Portuguese funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) in the framework of the projects POCI-01-0145-FEDERPTDC/EPH-PAT/3345/2014 and UID/BIA/04004/2020. João Trovão, Fabiana Soares, and Catarina Coelho were supported by POCH (Programa Operacional Capital Humano; cofunding by the European Social Fund and national funding by MCTES) through FCT Ph.D. research grants SFRH/BD/132523/2017, SFRH/BD/139720/2018, and SFRH/BD/148270/2019, respectively. Nuno Mesquita was supported by POCH (cofunding by the European Social Fund and national funding by MCTES) with a postdoctoral research grant (SFRH/BPD/112830/2015). Inês Costa was supported by Portuguese funds through FCT for the project “Monumental Stone Biodeterioration Assessment within the UNESCO World Heritage Site ‘University of Coimbra–Alta and Sofia’” (PTDC/EPH-PAT/3345/2014). Igor Tiago received financial support through a research contract (reference IF/01061/2014) provided by FCT. We thank FCT/Ministry of Education and Science (FCT/MEC) for funding the Organic Chemistry, Natural Products and Food Stuffs (QOPNA) research unit (FCT UID/QUI/00062/2019) through national funds (where applicable, cofinanced by the FEDER), within the Portugal 2020 Programme.
REFERENCES
- 1.Golubić S, Friedmann I, Schneider J. 1981. The lithobiontic ecological niche, with special reference to microorganisms. J Sediment Petrol 51:475–478. doi: 10.1306/212F7CB6-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Macedo MF, Miller AZ, Dionísio A, Saiz-Jimenez C. 2009. Biodiversity of cyanobacteria and green algae on monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: an overview. Microbiology 155:3476–3490. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.032508-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sterflinger K, Piñar G. 2013. Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art—tilting at windmills? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:9637–9646. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5283-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoffmann L. 1989. Algae of terrestrial habitats. Bot Rev 55:77–105. doi: 10.1007/BF02858529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crispim CA, Gaylarde CC. 2005. Cyanobacteria and biodeterioration of cultural heritage: a review. Microb Ecol 49:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-1052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soares F, Portugal A, Trovão J, Coelho C, Mesquita N, Pinheiro AC, Gil F, Catarino L, Cardoso SM, Tiago I. 2019. Structural diversity of photoautotrophic populations within the UNESCO site “Old Cathedral of Coimbra” (Portugal), using a combined approach. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 140:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Soares F, Tiago I, Trovão J, Coelho C, Mesquita N, Gil F, Catarino L, Cardoso SM, Portugal A. 2019. Description of Myxacorys almedinensis sp. nov. (Synechococcales, Cyanobacteria) isolated from the limestone walls of the Old Cathedral of Coimbra, Portugal (UNESCO World Heritage Site). Phytotaxa 419:77–90. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.419.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rippka R, Herdman M. 1992. Pasteur culture collection of cyanobacterial strains in axenic culture. Catalogue & taxonomic handbook. Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. 2018. MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krueger F. 2015. Trim Galore: a wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/.
- 11.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z. 2015. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3:e1165. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data from this whole-genome sequencing project have been submitted to NCBI under the accession number PRJNA596374. This submission encompasses both the raw data and assembled data.
