Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2020 Mar 25;35(6):1077–1078. doi: 10.1002/mds.28033

Natural Course of Myoclonus‐Dystonia in Adulthood: Stable Motor Signs But Increased Psychiatry

Elze R Timmers 1, Kathryn J Peall 2, Joke M Dijk 3, Rodi Zutt 1, Cees C Tijssen 4, Bruno Bergmans 5,6, Elisabeth M Foncke 3, Marina AJ Tijssen 1,
PMCID: PMC7317193  PMID: 32212347

Myoclonus‐dystonia (M‐D) is a rare hyperkinetic movement disorder characterized by upper body–predominant myoclonus and dystonia.1 A large proportion of cases are caused by autosomal‐dominant inherited mutations in the SGCE gene. In addition to the motor manifestations, psychiatric disorders are frequently reported.2 Several studies have suggested that they may form a primary component of the M‐D phenotype.3, 4 This study represents the first long‐term follow‐up study of both motor and psychiatric symptomatology in adults with M‐D (SGCE mutation), providing further insights into the natural history of M‐D and enabling more prognostic information.

Methods

Manifesting adult carriers with a mutation in the SGCE gene were included, whose baseline data were collected in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom and reported previously.2, 3, 5

Regarding motor signs, both at baseline and follow‐up, Burk Fahn Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Unified Myoclonus Rating scale (UMRS) were used to objectively assess motor sign severity. Psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life were evaluated using the same (or highly comparable) questionnaires at baseline and follow‐up.

Results

Of the 63 adult M‐D patients recruited in the original studies, 27 patients were able to participate in this follow‐up assessment. An overview of body distribution and severity scales of motor signs at baseline and follow‐up examination can be found in Table 1. No age‐distinctive pattern in the scores was observed. See Table 1 for the prevalence of psychiatric disorders and scores of severity scales. No associations between changes in motor symptoms and psychiatric symptom severity, quality of life, and demographic information were found.

Table 1.

Demographics, motor symptoms, and psychiatric comorbidities

Total number of patients 27
Sex M/F 11/16
Age at onset dystonia (range) 8 (1–40)
Age at onset myoclonus (range) 7 (1–17)
Oral medication for motor symptoms 6 (22%)
Antidepressant
SSRI 4 (13%)
SNRI 2 (7%)
TCA 1 (3%)
Botulinum neurotoxin injections 3 (11%)
Motor symptoms Baseline examination Follow‐up examination P
Age (SD) 44.6 (14.3) 55.2 (14.4)
Number of patients with:
Dystonia 23 (85%) 25 (93%) 0.625a
Myoclonus 22 (81%) 24 (89%) 0.500a
Body distribution
Dystonia (n = 21)
— Upper limbs 5 (24%) 18 (86%) < 0.001 a
— Lower limbs 2 (10%) 5 (24%) 0.250a
— Neck 18 (86%) 19 (90%) 1.000a
— Trunk 5 (24%) 8 (38%) 0.453a
Myoclonus (n = 22)
— Upper limbs 20 (91%) 20 (91%) 1.000a
— Lower limbs 1 (5%) 7 (32%) 0.070a
— Neck 8 (36%) 16 (73%) 0.008 a
— Trunk 6 (27%) 15 (68%) 0.012 a
All patients
BFMDRS, n = 24 (range) 3.5 (0–20) 6.6 (0–17.5) 0.203b
UMRS, n = 24 (range) 2.3 (0–12) 3.7 (0–12) 0.140b
Patients with mutation inherited via paternal line
BFMDRS, n = 19 (range) 4.0 (0–20) 7.0 (1–17.5) 0.198b
UMRS, n = 19, (range) 5.2 (0–12) 5.4 (0–12) 0.260b
Baseline examination Follow‐up examination
Psychiatry n = 26 n = 6 P a
Any psychiatric disorder 16 (62%) 20 (77%) 0.219
Depression 7 (27%) 13 (50%) 0.070
Panic disorder 6 (23%) 12 (46%) 0.031
Social phobia 6 (23%) 4 (15%) 0.688
OCD 3 (12%) 6 (23%) 0.453
Alcohol dependence 3 (12%) 3 (12%) 1.000
GAD 3 (12%) 3 (12%) 1.000
Specific phobia 3 (14%)3 5 (23%)3 0.688
Agoraphobia 4 (33%)4 6 (50%)4 0.500
Hypomania 1 (10%)6 1 (10%)6 1.000
Psychosis 1 (10%)6 2 (20%)6 1.000
n = 22 n = 22 P b
YBOCS (range) 0.0 (0–14) 0.0 (0–12) 0.634
BDI (range) 5.0 (0–21) 7.5 (0–30) 0.038
BAI (range) 5.0 (0–24) 7.5 (0–45) 0.070
n = 13 n = 13 P c
QoL PC (SD) 44.8 (8.8) 45.2 (6.9) 0.875
QoL MC (SD) 38.8 (13.6) 43.0 (9.2) 0.193

The following statistical tests were used:

a

McNemar test.

b

Wilcoxon signed rank test.

c

Paired‐sample t test: 1n = 9; 2n = 5; 3n = 22; 4n = 12; 5n = 7; 6n = 10.

SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; SNRI, selective serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; BFMDRS, Burke Fahn Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale; UMRS, Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale; OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder; GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; YBOCS, Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; QoL PC, physical component of quality of life; QoL MC, mental component of quality of life.

Discussion

This is the first systematic long‐term follow‐up study of both motor and psychiatric manifestations in adult M‐D patients. Despite the percentage of patients retested (27 of 63), the rarity of M‐D makes our results valuable. Results of this study showed that in adulthood the course of dystonia and myoclonus is static and the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities remains high. Specific psychiatric disorders, notably panic disorder and depression, became even more prevalent over time.

It appears that in adulthood severity of motor manifestations is relatively stable, but distribution lightly changed. At follow‐up examination significantly more patients had dystonia in the upper limbs and more patients had myoclonus in the neck and trunk compared with baseline. This is consistent with previous findings.6

Comparable to the literature, psychiatric comorbidity was highly prevalent in our cohort. The prevalence of panic disorder doubled at follow‐up compared with baseline and was accompanied by an increased score on the anxiety severity scale. Similar, but not statistically significant, findings were detected for depressive disorder. It is unlikely that our findings are because of an increase in age, as the prevalence of panic disorder and depression in the general population tends to decrease in the age group of our cohort.7

The relatively stable course of motor manifestations is in contrast with the increased prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity. Results highlight the need for more awareness and adequate treatment for psychiatric disorders in M‐D patients. Simultaneously, adult patients can be reassured that their motor functioning will not deteriorate.

Author Roles

1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; 2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; 3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.

E.R.T.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A.K.J.P.: 1B, 1C, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3B.J.M.D.: 1C, 2C, 3B.R.Z.: 1C, 2C, 3B.C.C.T.: 1B, 1C, 2C, 3B.B.B.: 1B, 2C, 3B.E.M.F.: 1C, 2C, 3B.M.A.J.T.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2C, 3A, 3B.

Financial Disclosures of all authors (for the preceding 12 months)

M.A.J.T. and E.R.T. received a grant from the Dystonia Medical Foundation for conducting this study. M.A.J.T. reports grants from the European Fund for Regional Development (01492947) and the province of Friesland, Stichting Wetenschapsfonds Dystonie Vereniging, Fonds Psychische Gezondheid, Phelps Stichting, from Ipsen & Allergan Farmaceutics, Merz, and Actelion. All other authors report no financial disclosures.

Acknowledgment

Authors want to thank A.M.M. van der Stouwe and M. Smit for scoring a part of the follow‐up videos, A. Kuiper, J. van Zijl, H. Eggink, M. Coenen, A.L. Bartels, and J. Gelauff for helping with the collection of the data, and Z. Yilmaz for contacting the UK patients.

Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: M.T. and E.T. received funding from the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF). All other authors report no disclosures. None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

Funding agencies: This study was supported by the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF).

References

  • 1. Roze E, Lang AE, Vidailhet M. Myoclonus‐dystonia: classification, phenomenology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 2018; 31:484–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Peall KJ, Smith DJ, Kurian MA, et al. SGCE mutations cause psychiatric disorders: clinical and genetic characterization. Brain 2013;136:294–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. van Tricht MJ, Dreissen YE, Cath D, et al. Cognition and psychopathology in myoclonus‐dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:814–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Peall KJ, Dijk JM, Saunders‐Pullman R, et al. Psychiatric disorders, myoclonus dystonia and SGCE: an international study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2015;3:4–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Foncke EM, Cath D, Zwinderman K, Smit J, Schmand B, Tijssen M. Is psychopathology part of the phenotypic spectrum of myoclonus‐dystonia?: a study of a large Dutch M‐D family. Cogn Behav Neurol 2009;22:127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Peall KJ, Kurian MA, Wardle M, et al. SGCE and myoclonus dystonia: motor characteristics, diagnostic criteria and clinical predictors of genotype. J Neurol 2014;261:2296–2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lenze EJ, Wetherell JL. A lifespan view of anxiety disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011;13:381–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Movement Disorders are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES