Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;21(12):1218–1223. doi: 10.1002/cphc.202000301

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Absorbance for different concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, 5 and 50 mol/l of the hypothetical material assuming c ⋅ d=50 cm ⋅ mol/l: a) conventional dispersion formula, b) conventional dispersion formula assuming additionally a redshift according to ν˜'0i=ν˜0i2-c3Si*2 , c) Lorentz‐Lorenz formula [Eq. (10)] in combination with (18), d) Same as c) but with hypothetical solvent. Note that for d), in contrast to a)–c), a constant d=10−6 cm was chosen and that the range of the y‐axis is different.