Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2020 Jun 23;64(7):e00275-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00275-20

Anidulafungin and Micafungin Concentrations in Cerebrospinal Fluid and in Cerebral Cortex

Jana Marx a, René Welte a, Tiziana Gasperetti a, Patrizia Moser b,*, Ronny Beer c, Martin Ortler d,*, Martina Jeske e, Ramona Stern e, Andreas Pomaroli f, Michael Joannidis g, Romuald Bellmann a,
PMCID: PMC7318006  PMID: 32340985

Anidulafungin and micafungin were quantified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of critically ill adults and in cerebral cortex of deceased patients. In CSF, anidulafungin levels (<0.01 to 0.66 μg/ml) and micafungin levels (<0.01 to 0.16 μg/ml) were lower than those in plasma concentrations (0.77 to 5.07 and 1.21 to 8.70 μg/ml, respectively) drawn simultaneously. In cerebral cortex, anidulafungin and micafungin levels were 0.21 to 2.34 and 0.18 to 2.88 μg/g, respectively.

KEYWORDS: echinocandins, antifungal target-site pharmacokinetics, CNS penetration, fungal meningoencephalitis, CNS candidiasis, critically ill

ABSTRACT

Anidulafungin and micafungin were quantified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of critically ill adults and in cerebral cortex of deceased patients. In CSF, anidulafungin levels (<0.01 to 0.66 μg/ml) and micafungin levels (<0.01 to 0.16 μg/ml) were lower than those in plasma concentrations (0.77 to 5.07 and 1.21 to 8.70 μg/ml, respectively) drawn simultaneously. In cerebral cortex, anidulafungin and micafungin levels were 0.21 to 2.34 and 0.18 to 2.88 μg/g, respectively. Thus, MIC values of several pathogenic Candida strains exceed concentrations in CSF and in brain.

TEXT

The echinocandins anidulafungin and micafungin are recommended for treatment of invasive candidiasis (1, 2). Candidiasis of the central nervous system (CNS) is associated with a high mortality of 80% to 100% in immunocompromised patients (3, 4). Because knowledge on penetration of echinocandins into human CNS is limited, we quantified anidulafungin and micafungin in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of critically ill patients and the cerebral cortex of deceased patients.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Austrian law. Written informed consent for scientific use of CSF and blood samples was granted by competent patients. Post hoc consent was obtained from patients who were incompetent at the time of enrollment. Autopsy samples were taken from deceased patients who, on admission, had permitted scientific use of residual specimens taken for clinical laboratory tests.

CSF was taken during diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) or via external ventricular drain (EVD) from critically ill adults treated with anidulafungin or micafungin. Simultaneously, we took 2-ml arterial blood samples. CSF and plasma were stored at –80°C.

Anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography and UV detection (HPLC-UV) as described previously (5). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics was calculated with Kinetica 2000 (InnaPhase Corporation, Champs-sur-Marne, France). The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) was computed with the log-linear method when the concentration in a trapezoid decreased or with the trapezoidal method when the concentration increased.

The cerebral cortex of deceased patients who had received anidulafungin or micafungin within their last 30 days of life was sampled during autopsy, which is routinely performed for quality assurance in Austrian hospitals. Anidulafungin and micafungin were extracted from 0.2 g of tissue by addition of 250 μl of acetonitrile and 250 μl of methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria), homogenization with a Precellys homogenizer (Bertin Instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) at 4,500 rpm (twice for 25 s, 2-s break), and centrifugation for 5 min at 8°C and 4,665 × g. For calibration, we used porcine brain samples spiked with anidulafungin or micafungin and homogenized and proceeded in the same manner. Both echinocandins were quantified by HPLC-UV at 306 nm (5). The lower limit of quantification was 0.05 μg/g for anidulafungin and 0.10 μg/g for micafungin. The extraction recovery from brain was ∼40% and ∼60% for anidulafungin and micafungin, respectively.

The significance of the difference between CSF and plasma concentrations was assessed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, and the difference between the penetration ratio (PR) of anidulafungin and PR of micafungin was calculated by Mann-Whitney U test using IBM SPSS statistics 24.0. PR was the ratio between the AUC0–24 in CSF and that in plasma over 24 h (AUC0–24 CSF/AUC0–24 plasma), when multiple samples were drawn via EVD. For single samples drawn by LP, PR was the ratio between the concentration in CSF and that in plasma (CCSF/Cplasma).

CSF samples were obtained from three patients on anidulafungin and three patients on micafungin. One patient on anidulafungin (patient 2) and one patient on micafungin (patient 5) had undergone EVD (Table 1; Fig. 1). CSF concentrations of anidulafungin (<0.7 μg/ml) and micafungin (<0.2 μg/ml) were lower than the corresponding plasma concentrations (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) (Table 1; Fig. 1). PRs of anidulafungin and micafungin were similar (P = 0.40). In the cerebral cortex of four deceased patients, anidulafungin had reached concentrations of 0.21 to 2.34 μg/g. Brain concentrations of micafungin were <0.10 to 2.88 μg/g (n = 6). Anidulafungin and micafungin were measurable even 13 and 10 days, respectively, after treatment (Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Penetration of anidulafungin or micafungin into cerebrospinal fluid of critically ill patients

Sample source and patient no.a Main diagnosisb Age (yr) Sex Wt (kg) Drugc Cumulative dose (mg) Treatment dayd CSF concn (μg/ml) Plasma concn (μg/ml) PRe Time from infusion (h)f Sample type Cmax (μg/ml)g Cmin (μg/ml)h AUC0–24 (μg · h/ml) Tmax (h)i t1/2 (h)j
Lumbar puncture
    1 ALL relapse, st. p. HSCT, pneumonia 25 F 63 AFG 300 3 0.05 3.83 0.01 3.0
    3 C. krusei, peritonitis, candidemia, st. p. LTX 40 F 46 AFG 2,500 24 <0.01 5.07 <0.002 0.5
    4 Tick-borne encephalitis, pneumonia, sepsis 83 M 75 MFG 200 2 0.09 1.21 0.08 16.0
    6 NK-T-cell lymphoma, sepsis 48 M 79 MFG 1,300 13 0.10 3.51 0.03 2.5
External ventricular drainage
    2 SAH, C. albicans meningitis,k candidemia 56 M 160 AFG 200 1 0.07 CSF 0.66 0.03 2.09 1 7.90
Plasma 2.72 0.77 29.41 1 14.70
    5 ICH, CAA, sepsis 72 F 50 MFG 200 2 0.02 CSF 0.16 <0.01 2.01 4 13.80
Plasma 8.70 2.16 112.70 1 12.90
a

When cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was sampled via external ventricular drainage (EVD), the collection bags were changed before and 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h after start of infusion. Simultaneously with LP or with the changes of the collection bags, 2-ml blood samples were taken from an arterial line using heparinized vials (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Lower limit of quantification is 0.01 μg/ml for AFG and MFG; steady state had not yet been reached in patients 1, 2, 4, and 5.

b

ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; st. p., status post; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; LTX, liver transplantation; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

c

AFG, anidulafungin; MFG, micafungin.

d

Day of echinocandin treatment; anidulafungin (Ecalta, Pfizer Limited, Sandwich, Kent, UK) and micafungin (Mycamine, Astellas, Tokyo, Japan) were administered for suspected or proven invasive candidiasis at the discretion of the treating physician.

e

Penetration ratio, ratio between AUC0–24 in CSF and in plasma.

f

Time between start of the anidulafungin or micafungin infusion and sampling.

g

Peak concentration.

h

Trough concentration.

i

Time to Cma.x.

j

Half-life.

k

A Candida meningoencephalitis was diagnosed 2 days after sampling and required a switch to liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Concentration-time profiles of anidulafungin (AFG) and micafungin (MFG) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma over the dosage interval of 24 h.

TABLE 2.

Anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations in autopsy samples of cerebral cortex

Patient no. Main diagnosisa Age (yr) Sex Wt (kg) Drug Cumulative dose (mg) Treatment duration (days)b Interval between last AFG/MFG administration and death (h) Interval between death and sampling (h)c Concn (μg/g)
7 COPD, pneumonia 74 F 135 AFG 700 6 32 14 0.21
8 DLBCL, septic shock 68 F 85 AFG 1,800 17 313 25 0.28
9 DLBCL, st. p. HSCT, ileus, pneumonia 45 F 43 AFG 1,500 14 12 15 2.34
10 Sepsis, peritonitis after sigmoid perforation 70 F 50 AFG 1,200 11 29 21 1.58
11 Burkitt-lymphoma relapse, st. p. HSCT 38 M 80 MFG 1,100 19 712 58 <0.10
12 Wound infection (C. albicans), septic shock, osteomyelofibrosis 60 M 92 MFG 5,300 28 230 85 1.52
13 Cholangiocarcinoma, biliary-pleural fistula, sepsis 49 M 80 MFG 1,800 18 111 38 0.18
14 St. p. LuTX, ischemic stroke, pneumonia 58 M 60 MFG 500 4 25 74 2.88
15 Fungal endophthalmitis, pneumonia, COPD 76 M 81 MFG 300 3 324 80 <0.10
16 St. p. LTX, hepatic artery occlusion, wound infection 71 F 85 MFG 4,000 39 235 29 0.19
a

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; st. p., status post; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; LuTX, lung transplantation.

b

Treatment duration, days of echinocandin therapy.

c

Patients had deceased during or within 30 days after treatment with anidulafungin (AFG) or micafungin (MFG). AFG (Ecalta, Pfizer Limited, Sandwich, Kent, UK) and MFG (Mycamine, Astellas, Tokyo, Japan) were stable in brain tissue for at least 96 h at 4°C, which was the storage temperature of the corpses. AFG and MFG had been administered for suspected or proven invasive candidiasis at the discretion of the treating physician. The lower limit of quantification is 0.05 μg/g for AFG and 0.10 μg/g for MFG.

In some of the CSF and brain specimens, measured anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations were below the MICs reported for relevant Candida species (i.e., 0.008 to 4.0 μg/ml) (6). In the CSF of patients 2 and 5, the target AUC0–24/MIC ratios of 2,782 and 5,299 suggested for anidulafungin and micafungin, respectively, have not been achieved, not even for highly susceptible Candida strains (6, 7). However, the relevance of in vitro MIC values for antifungal activity of echinocandins in CSF and in CNS remains to be clarified. In CSF, protein binding of anidulafungin and micafungin is unknown. In vitro, protein binding obviously affects MICs (8, 9). We did not separate protein-bound from free echinocandins. In our small and heterogeneous study population, only two patients (patients 3 and 6) reached steady state, when CSF was taken by LP, and only two patients (patients 2 and 4) suffered from CNS infections that might have enhanced permeability of the blood-brain barrier (10). However, CSF concentrations and PRs of anidulafungin and micafungin in patients 2 and 4 were similar to those in our other patients.

During cerebral aspergillosis, the 2-fold maximum dose of micafungin (i.e., 300 mg/day) achieved CSF concentrations of <0.02 μg/ml (11). After intracranial hemorrhage, micafungin CSF levels amounted to 0.019 to 4.66 μg/ml (12). Caspofungin was undetectable in CSF during meningeal coccidioidomycosis and in 9 of 11 CSF samples from children with hematological malignancies (13, 14). In infants with meningitis, daily high doses of 8 to 10 mg/kg of micafungin resulted in CSF concentrations of 0.80 to 1.80 μg/ml (15). In neonatal rats, anidulafungin brain concentrations of 1.60 and 4.40 μg/g were measured (16). Along with the higher dosage, the immaturity of the blood-brain barrier might explain the higher penetration into CSF and brain.

In brain specimens, we cannot rule out minor agonal or postmortem changes of anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations, although anidulafungin and micafungin were stable in the brains of deceased patients for at least 96 h. Brain specimens consist of various compartments, e.g., different cells, extracellular matrix, and blood vessels. Anidulafungin and micafungin were not quantified on a cellular level or in different brain areas. Echinocandin extraction from human brain might yield slightly lower recovery than extraction from external standards. In rats, [3H]caspofungin brain concentrations were ≤0.16 μg eq/g (17). In rabbits, micafungin brain concentrations were <0.19 μg/g, and those of anidulafungin were <4.0 μg/g (18, 19). In a biopsy sample of a brain abscess, a micafungin concentration of 0.26 μg/g was measured (20).

In conclusion, anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations in CSF and in brain specimens were below the in vitro MIC values of several pathogenic Candida strains. Studies on target-site pharmacodynamics are required for assessment of antifungal efficacy.

(Parts of the data were presented at the 23rd and 25th Scientific Symposium of the Austrian Pharmacological Society, 2017 and 2019, Innsbruck, Austria.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant KLI 565-B31).

We thank Thomas Nachtigall, Obersöchering, Germany, for donation of the HPLC system and for technical support. Porcine brain was kindly provided by Landmetzgerei Piegger, Sistrans, Austria.

R.B. has received an IIR grant from Pfizer; research support from Rokitan, Vienna, Austria; and a lecture fee from Basilea Pharmaceutica, Basel, Switzerland. He is a member of an advisory board of Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Otherwise, we have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. 2016. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1–e50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Garbino J, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, Meersseman W, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Castagnola E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Donnelly JP, Groll AH, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Jensen HE, Lass-Flörl C, Petrikkos G, Richardson MD, Roilides E, Verweij PE, Viscoli C, Ullmann AJ, ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group . 2012. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(Suppl 7):19–37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Góralska K, Blaszkowska J, Dzikowiec M. 2018. Neuroinfections caused by fungi. Infection 46:443–459. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1152-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwartz S, Kontoyiannis DP, Harrison T, Ruhnke M. 2018. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections of the CNS. Lancet Neurol 17:362–372. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Welte R, Oberacher H, Schwärzler B, Joannidis M, Bellmann R. 2020. Quantification of anidulafungin and micafungin in human body fluids by high performance-liquid chromatography with UV-detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1139:121937. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Castanheira M. 2017. CD101, a long-acting echinocandin, and comparator antifungal agents tested against a global collection of invasive fungal isolates in the SENTRY 2015 Antifungal Surveillance Program. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50:352–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Andes D, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Bohrmuller J, Marchillo K, Lepak A. 2010. In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2497–2506. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01584-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ernst EJ, Roling EE, Petzold CR, Keele DJ, Klepser ME. 2002. In vitro activity of micafungin (FK-463) against Candida spp.: microdilution, time-kill, and postantifungal-effect studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3846–3853. doi: 10.1128/aac.46.12.3846-3853.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Odabasi Z, Paetznick V, Rex JH, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2007. Effects of serum on in vitro susceptibility testing of echinocandins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:4214–4216. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01589-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nau R, Sörgel F, Eiffert H. 2010. Penetration of drugs through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid/blood-brain barrier for treatment of central nervous system infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:858–883. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00007-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okugawa S, Ota Y, Tatsuno K, Tsukada K, Kishino S, Koike K. 2007. A case of invasive central nervous system aspergillosis treated with micafungin with monitoring of micafungin concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid. Scand J Infect Dis 39:344–346. doi: 10.1080/00365540600951333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yamada N, Kumada K, Kishino S, Mochizuki N, Ohno K, Ogura S. 2011. Distribution of micafungin in the tissue fluids of patients with invasive fungal infections. J Infect Chemother 17:731–734. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0240-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hsue G, Napier JT, Prince RA, Chi J, Hospenthal DR. 2004. Treatment of meningeal coccidioidomycosis with caspofungin. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:292–294. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Strenger V, Farowski F, Müller C, Hofer N, Dornbusch HJ, Sperl D, Lackner H, Benesch M, Urban C. 2017. Low penetration of caspofungin into cerebrospinal fluid following intravenous administration of standard doses. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50:272–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Auriti C, Falcone M, Ronchetti MP, Goffredo BM, Cairoli S, Crisafulli R, Piersigilli F, Corsetti T, Dotta A, Pai MP. 2016. High-dose micafungin for preterm neonates and infants with invasive and central nervous system candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7333–7339. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01172-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ripp SL, Aram JA, Bowman CJ, Chmielewski G, Conte U, Cross DM, Gao H, Lewis EM, Lin J, Liu P, Schlamm HT. 2012. Tissue distribution of anidulafungin in neonatal rats. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 95:89–94. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stone JA, Xu X, Winchell GA, Deutsch PJ, Pearson PG, Migoya EM, Mistry GC, Xi L, Miller A, Sandhu P, Singh R, deLuna F, Dilzer SC, Lasseter KC. 2004. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:815–823. doi: 10.1128/aac.48.3.815-823.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Ibrahim KH, Piscitelli SC, Bekersky I, Walsh TJ. 2001. Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the antifungal echinocandin lipopeptide micafungin (FK463) in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3322–3327. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3322-3327.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Lyman CA, Bacher JS, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. 2001. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2845–2855. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2845-2855.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lat A, Thompson GR, Rinaldi MG, Dorsey SA, Pennick G, Lewis JS. 2010. Micafungin concentrations from brain tissue and pancreatic pseudocyst fluid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:943–944. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01294-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES