Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2020 Apr 29;97(6):940–942. doi: 10.1111/cge.13753

A small 7q11.23 microduplication involving GTF2I in a family with intellectual disability

Michele Pinelli 1,2, Gaetano Terrone 1, Flavia Troglio 3, Gabriella Maria Squeo 4, Gerarda Cappuccio 1,2, Floriana Imperati 1, Piero Pignataro 5, Rita Genesio 5, Lucio Nitch 5, Ennio Del Giudice 1, Giuseppe Merla 4, Giuseppe Testa 3,6,7, Nicola Brunetti‐Pierri 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7318190  PMID: 32349160

Abstract

graphic file with name CGE-97-940-g002.jpg


To the Editor:

Recurrent deletions and duplications of 7q11.23 region are responsible for Williams‐Beuren Syndrome (WBS) and 7q11.23 microduplication syndrome (Dup7), respectively. 1 Both 7q11.23 deletions and duplications typically are 1.5 Mb in size and have recurrent breakpoints. However, atypical copy number variants (CNVs) of different sizes and breakpoints affecting the 7q11.23 region have also been reported. 2 Detailed phenotyping of these atypical cases can inform on the role of genes in the critical region. 2 For WBS, data from both patients and animal models suggest that GTF2I is responsible for the neurodevelopmental phenotype. In contrast, the role of GTF2I in the Dup7 is less clear. To date, only one subject presenting with autism spectrum disorder without cognitive impairment and carrying an atypical duplication sparing GTF2I has been reported. 3

We describe an 11‐year‐old male Caucasian proband, first child of non‐consanguineous parents with uneventful medical history until expressive language delay and learning difficulties were noted at 3 and 6 years of age, respectively. No abnormalities were detected by electroencephalography, and ophthalmologic and audiologic evaluations. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed non‐specific gliosis in the bilateral frontal white matter and a partial empty sella without evidence of endocrine dysfunctions. Abdominal ultrasonography showed hepatomegaly with mild steatosis. At 11 years of age, his weight was 76 kg (>95th centile, z‐score = +3.2) and height 144 cm (54th centile) with a body mass index of 36.6 kg/m2 (>95th centile, z‐score = +4.6). His head circumference was 56.2 cm (81st centile). Facial features included broad forehead, straight eyebrows, narrow eyelid fissures, deep set eyes, and thin upper lip (Figure 1A). Cognitive impairment and learning difficulties were also present in his younger brother and his mother (Figure 1B). Furthermore, his maternal grandmother had gait imbalance and chronic kidney failure. Both proband's mother and grandmother attended basic school grades and occasionally worked as housekeepers. His younger sister, father and maternal grandfather had no neuro‐developmental problems by report. All three siblings were obese.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

A, Pictures of the proband at the age of 8 years showing broad forehead, straight eyebrows, narrow eyelid fissures, deep set eyes, thin upper lip and obesity. B, Family pedigree. C,D, Snapshot of UCSC genome browser displaying the duplicated region in the proband, in the typical duplications and deletions, and in the case reported by Plaja et al. (patient 3 ‐ pt3).3 Both GTF2IRD1 and GFT2I transcripts are on the plus strand and thus, only GTF2I Transcription Start Site maps on the duplicated region. The breakpoints of the duplication were mapped by a combination of array CGH and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Data obtained by qPCR are marked with an *. E, GTF2I expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of the proband and controls. RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit following the manufacturer's directions and quantified by ThermoScientific NanoDrop 8000. A total of 200 ng of RNA was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). qRT‐PCR‐TaqMan assays for GTF2I and TBP (Hs01073660_m1 and Hs00427620_m1) from Applied Biosystems were used to quantify expression in 5 ng cDNA in triplicate. qRT‐PCR TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used. Data were normalized to TBP and fold changes calculated using the 2^‐ddCt formula using wild‐type PBMC as control. Statistical significance was evaluated by unpaired t‐test using Qbase+ software. *P < .01 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Evaluation of cognitive functioning by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV (WISC‐IV) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale‐Revised (WAIS‐R) in the proband, his siblings and his mother revealed a mild cognitive impairment with homogenous involvement of functional domains in his brother and mother (Full‐scale IQ of 61, 57, 91 and 62 for the proband, his brother, his sister, and his mother, respectively). In the proband, Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS) showed impaired adaptive behaviour consistent with his overall intellectual functioning and no evidences of psychopathological anomalies at clinical visit or at Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL 6‐18) testing. Maternal grandmother was unavailable for clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.

After obtaining informed consent, blood samples were collected from the proband, both his siblings, his parents and his maternal grandparents and high‐resolution array‐CGH (PerkinElmer CGX) and genomic real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed. A 7q11.23 duplication was detected in the proband, his brother, his mother and his grandmother with a minimum duplicated region spanning between nucleotides 73 944 168 and 74 138 459 (maximum interval between 73 929 917 and 74 264 323) (hg19) that partially overlapped with the typical recurrent Dup7 critical region (Figure 1B,C). The duplication was classified as variant of uncertain significance according to the consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) 4 and included the 3′ of GTF2IRD1, the intergenic region upstream GTF2I and a portion of the 5′ of GTF2I (Figure 1D). The telomeric portion of GTF2I is embedded into two segmental duplications and thus, the telomeric breakpoint of the duplication could not be precisely determined but it appeared to overlap with the typical Dup7 telomeric breakpoint 5 and involvement of NCF1 and GTF2IRD2 cannot be ruled out.

GTF2I expression was found to be elevated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the proband compared to controls, consistent with data previously reported in subjects with typical Dup7 (Figure 1E). Consistent with typical Dup7 phenotype,1, 5 the individuals herein presented also showed mild cognitive impairment with homogenous involvement of functional domains. In conclusion, the familial cases herein reported were found to carry a small 7q11.23 duplication that supports the role of GTF2I as critical gene for the cognitive impairment of Dup7.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Array‐CGH results have been released in DECIPHER (ID 379690) and ClinVar (SCV000998756).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the Telethon Foundation (GGP14265), Ricerca Corrente granted by the Italian Ministry of Health, the “5x1000” voluntary contributions to G.M. and a fellowship from Fondazione IEO‐CCM 2018 to F.T.

Peer Review The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/cge.13753.

Funding information Fondazione IEO, Grant/Award Number: CCM 2018; Fondazione Telethon, Grant/Award Number: GGP14265; Ministero della Salute

REFERENCES

  • 1. Berg JS, Brunetti‐Pierri N, Peters SU, et al. Speech delay and autism spectrum behaviors are frequently associated with duplication of the 7q11.23 Williams‐Beuren syndrome region. Genet Med. 2007;9(7):427‐441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Merla G, Brunetti‐Pierri N, Micale L, Fusco C. Copy number variants at Williams‐Beuren syndrome 7q11.23 region. Hum Genet. 2010;128(1):3‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Plaja A, Castells N, Cueto‐Gonzalez AM, et al. A novel recurrent breakpoint responsible for rearrangements in the Williams‐Beuren region. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;146(3):181‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy‐number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22(2):245‐257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Van der Aa N, Rooms L, Vandeweyer G, et al. Fourteen new cases contribute to the characterization of the 7q11.23 microduplication syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52(2–3):94‐100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Array‐CGH results have been released in DECIPHER (ID 379690) and ClinVar (SCV000998756).


Articles from Clinical Genetics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES