A standardized measure for 9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content in cannabis products is necessary to advance research both on the adverse effects of cannabis (e.g. risks for brain development, mental illness and addiction) and on the drug's potential medical uses
Recognizing the increasing diversity of cannabis products and their expanded use, Freeman & Lorenzetti propose a standard unit dose of 5 mg 9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to be used for all cannabis products, regardless of method of administration 1. They argue that a standard dose would help to guide consumers towards safer patterns of cannabis use. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) strongly supports the need for a standardized measure to facilitate research, and this was a key recommendation from NIDA's Cannabis Policy Research Council Workgroup 2.
However, as discussed by Freeman & Lorenzetti, the development of such a measure has been challenging, due to concerns that the effects of any standardized dose would differ on the basis of mode of consumption or, possibly, how it is combined with other cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) 3.
These complexities hardly negate the value of having a standardized measure of THC, irrespective of product type. In fact, having and using such a standard is a prerequisite for comparing the effects of various cannabis products on THC bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects 3, which is knowledge fundamental to studies pertaining to medical use of cannabis.
A standardized measure will also be essential for advancing our understanding of some of the major concerns related to cannabis use, especially its influence on brain development, and the risk for cannabis use disorders and psychoses 4, 5. Current and past studies evaluating the effects of cannabis on brain development and cognition, whether focused prenatally or during childhood or adolescence, are limited to rough estimates on the basis of reported frequency of use (life‐time, past year, past month or regular use) and there is no information on the THC content of the product(s) consumed 6.
This lack of information on THC content probably contributes to discrepancies among investigators, with some reporting adverse effects even after single cannabis exposure 7 and others showing no differences with regular exposures during adolescence 8. The Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study will prospectively investigate close to 12 000 children as they transition from childhood into adulthood with a variety of measures, including brain imaging, neurocognitive and behavioral tests, educational achievement and patterns of drug use 9. This study and others like it would benefit enormously from a standardized measure of THC, as would pre‐clinical studies aiming to mimic clinical exposures.
It is widely believed that the increase in THC content of cannabis (which almost tripled in the past 2 decades) 10, 11 is responsible for greater adverse effects associated with cannabis consumption 12. Evidence already points to a higher risk for cannabis use disorder and for psychoses with consumption of cannabis with high vs. low THC content, but these associations have been based on estimates of the THC content of cannabis in the region studied 13, 14, and research on the influence of THC content on adverse outcomes is very limited. One of the main challenges for conducting such research has been the multiplicity of issues that influence the dose of THC a user is exposed to, e.g. the ability to titrate the dose of an inhaled product. A standard dose will not, by itself, be able to address all of the various complexities noted, but it will move us towards greater precision in our measures.
Although cannabis remains an illicit substance in the United States, the expanded legalization by states requires us to develop the knowledge base that can help states develop policies to minimize risk from cannabis exposures, such as limits on the THC content of cannabis products.
Regarding what a standard THC dose should be, Freeman & Lorenzetti propose a unit dose of 5 mg THC for all cannabis products and methods of administration. Their rationale is that this dose has psychoactive effects regardless of route of administration, but is mostly devoid of adverse effects. This is a reasonable justification based on our current knowledge, although future research will help to determine its usefulness and whether there is a need to further refine the measure. Further research will also be necessary to develop a concomitant standard dose for CBD. Despite the multiple caveats and complexities, the use of a standard unit dose of THC in research is an important step for improving our ability to understand the effects of cannabis in the population.
Declaration of interests
None.
Volkow, N. D. , and Weiss, S. R. B. (2020) Importance of a standard unit dose for cannabis research. Addiction, 115: 1219–1221. 10.1111/add.14984.
References
- 1. Freeman TP, Lorenzetti V. ‘Standard THC units’: a proposal to standardize dose across all cannabis products and methods of administration. Addiction 2020; 115: 1207–1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) In: Recommendations for NIDA's Cannabis Policy Research Agenda: Report from the Cannabis Policy Research Workgroup. Bethesda, MD: NIDA; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boggs D. L., Nguyen J. D., Morgenson D., Taffe M. A., Ranganathan M. Clinical and preclinical evidence for functional interactions of cannabidiol and Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43: 142–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Volkow N. D., Swanson J. M., Evins A. E., DeLisi L. E., Meier M. H., Gonzalez R. et al Effects of cannabis use on human behavior, including cognition, motivation, and psychosis: a review. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73: 292–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine In: The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Meier M. H., Caspi A., Ambler A., Harrington H., Houts R., Keefe R. S. et al Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: E2657–E2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Orr C., Spechler P., Cao Z., Albaugh M., Chaarani B., Mackey S. et al Grey matter volume differences associated with extremely low levels of cannabis use in adolescence. J Neurosci 2019; 39: 1817–1827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Scott J. C., Rosen A. F. G., Moore T. M., Roalf D. R., Satterthwaite T. D., Calkins M. E. et al Cannabis use in youth is associated with limited alterations in brain structure. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44: 1362–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Volkow N. D., Koob G. F., Croyle R. T., Bianchi D. W., Gordon J. A., Koroshetz W. J. et al The conception of the ABCD study: from substance use to a broad NIH collaboration. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2018; 32: 4–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chandra S., Radwan M. M., Majumdar C. G., Church J. C., Freeman T. P., ElSohly M. A. New trends in cannabis potency in USA and Europe during the last decade (2008–2017). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019; 269: 5–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. ElSohly M. A., Ross S. A., Mehmedic Z., Arafat R., Yi B., Banahan B. F. III. Potency trends of delta9‐THC and other cannabinoids in confiscated marijuana from 1980–1997. J Forens Sci 2000; 45: 24–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Volkow N. D., Baler R. Emergency department visits from edible versus inhalable cannabis. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170: 569–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Arterberry B. J., Treloar Padovano H., Foster K. T., Zucker R. A., Hicks B. M. Higher average potency across the United States is associated with progression to first cannabis use disorder symptom. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 195: 186–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Di Forti M., Quattrone D., Freeman T. P., Tripoli G., Gayer‐Anderson C., Quigley H. et al The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU‐GEI): a multicentre case–control study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6: 427–436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]