Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Jun 25;12(6):e8825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8825

Retrograde Intussusception after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Akshay Kumar 1,, Stephanie Ogbonda 2, Purnadeo Persaud 3, Nimisha Shiwalkar 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7320641  PMID: 32607307

Abstract

Retrograde intussusception (RI), although relatively uncommon, has been increasingly seen in adults post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. The exact mechanism for its occurrence remains unknown but several theories have attributed it to bowel persialtic dysmotility. The increase in bariatric surgery over the last decade has resulted in a proportionate increase in the number of cases of intussusception seen globally. We report a case of RI seven years following RYGB done for morbid obesity.

Keywords: retrograde intussusception, gastric bypass surgery, laparoscopy

Introduction

Retrograde intussusception (RI) is a rare long-term complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (0.1%-0.3%), however, its etiology still remains unclear [1]. The origin of intussusception after gastric bypass is different from that of intussusception of other causes and is likely related to motility disorders in the divided small bowel, especially in the Roux limb [2]. This rare condition may cause obstruction and lead to bowel strangulation if not recognized and treated promptly. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scan of the abdomen represents the diagnostic test of choice, however, a definite diagnosis cannot be established unless the patient undergoes surgical exploration [3]. For uncomplicated cases, where the bowel appears to be viable, simple reduction may suffice. Nevertheless, resection of the affected segment is recommended when bowel gangrene ensues.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with epigastric abdominal pain, nausea, and non-bilious vomiting of one-day duration. The pain was predominantly in the upper abdomen and was associated with multiple bouts of non-bilious, non-bloody emesis. She was passing flatus and had bowel movement until one day prior to presentation. The patient reported no significant past medical history except for being operated for laparoscopic gastric bypass seven years ago. Her vitals were stable with a temperature of 36.7 C, heart rate of 67 beats per minute, blood pressure of 155/86 mmHg, and respiratory rate of 18/min. Physical examination revealed infraumbilical and epigastric scar from the previous laparoscopy. There was tenderness noted on palpation in the epigastric region without any guarding or rigidity. It was appreciated on the upright X-ray abdomen that there were multiple dilated small bowel loops in the left upper quadrant (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Upright X-ray abdomen showed dilated bowel loops in the left upper quadrant.

Figure 1

Her labs were within normal range except for white count of 11,400/mm3. CECT scan of abdomen revealed bowel within bowel configuration in concentric rings in the left mid-abdomen suggestive of intussusception (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CECT scan of abdomen revealed bowel within bowel configuration in concentric rings (white arrow) in the left mid-abdomen suggestive of intussusception.

Figure 2

CECT: contrast-enhanced computerized tomography.

She underwent diagnostic laparoscopy which confirmed the diagnosis. Formal midline laparotomy with lysis of adhesions and reduction of intussusception was performed. However, the proximal small bowel was found to be non-viable and about 105 cm of the bowel from the jejunojenostomy was resected and continuity of bowel was achieved with side-to-side anastomosis using gastrointestinal anastomsis (GIA) stapling device (Figure 3). The common enterotomy was closed with 3-0 polydioxanone (PDS) in a running followed by 3-0 silk in an interrupted fashion. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and she was discharged after tolerating full orals and return of bowel function.

Figure 3. Intraoperative photo showing jejuno-jejunal intussusception (white arrow).

Figure 3

Discussion

Intussusception in adults is more frequently caused by structural lesions such as benign polyps, Meckel's diverticulum, intraluminal lipoms, and malignant neoplasms [4]. However, there is an increasing number of patients undergoing bariatric surgery procedures, retrograde or anti-peristaltic intussusception which has been identified as a long-term complication of RYGB surgery. RI in them typically occurs as telescoping of a distal bowel segment into the proximal segment at the site of jejuno-jejunostomy causing obstruction and if left untreated, in bowel strangulation or gangrene. Several case reports have described wherein RI occurs after both open and laparoscopic RYGB surgeries. The diagnosis of intussusception in this subsect of patients remains a significant challenge. The common symptoms presented by patients include abdominal pain, weight loss, constipation, nausea, and vomiting [5]. Physical examination could reveal tenderness in the epigastric or periumbilical region. Unlike in pediatric cases with intussusception, a palpable mass is not often discernible. The patient could also present with a scar indicating a previous bypass surgery and this should trigger the possibility of intussusception. The exact mechanism remains unknown; however, it is thought to be caused by peristaltic dysmotility which leads to small bowel obstruction. It is important to assess the viability of each bowel segment to prevent bowel ischemia and later stricture formation.

Animal studies replicating RYGB construction have shown that suppression of these ectopic pacemakers by either electrical pacing or by using an “uncut roux” prevents stasis by maintaining enteric myoneural continuity [6]. To date, the most widely accepted view has been that the creation of Roux limb disrupts the natural intestinal pacemakers in the duodenum and allows for the formation of ectopic pacemakers or migratory motor complexes in the Roux limb. It is believed that the electric potential generated by these ectopic pacemakers migrates in both the distal as well as the proximal limbs. This creates an area or segment of dysmotility, which according to some authors is responsible for developing intussusception in these patients [7]. 

The diagnostic tool most useful for detecting this condition is a CT scan. It reveals concentric rings which indicate a classic “target sign” identified in cases of intussusception. Surgical management is the most preferred treatment for intussusception which involves resection and anastomosis of the ischemic bowel. Despite treatment, the recurrence rate is about 0.2% with a mortality range of 1% to 16% [8].

Conclusions

RI is an important cause of small bowel obstruction after bariatric surgery. Correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment in a timely manner can prevent mortality and morbidity.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Retrograde (reverse) jejunal intussusception might not be such a rare problem: a single group's experience of 23 cases. Simper SC, Erzinger JM, McKinlay RD, Smith SC. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adult intussusception. Lu T, Chng YM. Perm J. 2015;19:79–81. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rare case of concurrent intussusception and volvulus after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ng M, Toribio R, Sugiyama G. J Surg Case Rep. 2013:0. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjs018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Intussusception after Roux-en-y gastric bypass in a pregnant patient. Ali BI, Al Jabali M, Al Masoud A, Al-Zahrani A. J Med Cases. 2016;7:260–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elimination of the Roux stasis syndrome using a new type of “uncut Roux” limb. Tu BN, Kelly KA. Am J Surg. 1995;170:381–386. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80308-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Intussusception in adults: CT diagnosis. Gayer G, Apter S, Hofmann C, Nass S, Amitai M, Zissin R, Hertz M. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:53–57. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(98)80035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Antiperistaltic and isoperistaltic intussusception associated with abnormal motility after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case report. Hocking MP, McCoy DM, Vogel SB, Kaude JV, Sninsky CA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1866683. Surgery. 1991;110:109–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jejunojejunal intussusception after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review. Daellenbach L, Suter M. Obes Surg. 2011;21:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0298-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES