A 47‐year‐old lady presented to the emergency department via ambulance with a month‐long history of worsening right breast cellulitis and discharge from a periareolar abscess. Her significant past history included a breast abscess managed conservatively two years prior, body mass index of 44 kg/m2, autoimmune vasculitis for which she was taking long‐term low‐dose prednisolone. She was also an ex‐smoker and suffered from anxiety. Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic lockdown measures, the patient was reluctant to present to the emergency department, but also struggled to find adequate medical attention in the community.
On arrival, the patient was in septic shock with a metabolic acidosis and acute renal failure requiring vasopressor support and continuous venous–venous haemodiafiltration. Her right breast showed signs of a necrotising infection with subcutaneous crepitus (Fig. 1).
The patient was commenced on broad spectrum antibiotics (meropenem, vancomycin and caspofungin) and taken to theatre for debridement of her right breast. Intra‐operative findings were concordant with necrotising fasciitis and a complete mastectomy was required to fully excise the diseased tissues (Fig. 2). A negative‐pressure dressing was applied with a planned re‐look in 24 h. She remained intubated and was transferred to the intensive care unit. Upon return to theatre, the necrosis had extended into the axilla and a further debridement was performed (Fig. 3A). The patient was kept intubated and transferred to another tertiary centre to receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Two cycles were received in total. On day five after her initial mastectomy, the wound conditions were favourable and repaired with primary closure (Fig. 3B). She was successfully extubated, weaned off inotropic support and her renal function returned to baseline. She recovered well on the ward with ongoing intravenous antibiotics, drain tube management and allied health input.
Fig 3.

Intra‐operative photographs demonstrating both the extent of debridement (A) and appearance following delayed primary closure (B).
Fig 1.

Appearance of the right breast immediately prior to debridement.
Fig 2.

Intra‐operative photography. Mastectomy specimen demonstrating the serial incisions required in order to reach viable tissue.
Histopathological assessment confirmed the diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis within the resected tissue. Of note, there was no evidence of vasculitis in the breast. Tissue cultures revealed Staphylococcus hemolyticus, Peptinipholus, Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Necrotising fasciitis is a rare condition characterized by widespread necrosis of subcutaneous tissue and fascial planes with significant systemic toxicity. It is associated with an average mortality of 20.6% and is a surgical emergency. 1 Predisposing factors include immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and malnutrition. Trauma, surgery, burns or soft tissue infections are common aetiologies for necrotising fasciitis. 2 Early signs of necrotising fasciitis include cellulitis and pyrexia, whereas systemic sepsis, blistering or crepitus manifest later with progressive disease. While necrotising fasciitis can occur anywhere, common sites include the perineum, lower extremities and post‐operative wounds. 3
In contrast, necrotising fasciitis of the breast is extremely rare, with only 13 cases described in literature. 4 Given the rarity of this condition, prompt diagnosis is hindered by mimickers such as mastitis, abscess and inflammatory breast malignancies. 5 , 6 Depending on the extent of the disease, various surgical treatments for breast necrotising fasciitis have been described including debridement and skin graft, quandrantectomy, nipple conserving debridement and radical mastectomy. 7 , 8 , 9 In a report by Alshareef and Alsaleh, bilateral mastectomies were performed for involvement of both breasts. 6
With this rare condition, this case highlights the collateral healthcare issues brought upon by the COVID‐19 pandemic. A delay in presentation due to lockdown orders resulted in clinical progression to an end‐stage, critical condition requiring radical medical and surgical measures. The full ramifications of the virus on our economy, healthcare and livelihoods will not be known until long after the pandemic is over. However, it is highly likely that the viral pandemic will potentiate significant non‐COVID‐19 morbidity and mortality.
References
- 1. Nawijn F, Smeeing DPJ, Houwert RM, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F. Time is of the essence when treating necrotizing soft tissue infections: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2020; 15: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Diab J, Bannan A, Pollitt T. Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ 2020; 369: m1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hasham S, Matteucci P, Stanley PRW, Hart NB. Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ 2005; 330: 830–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Marks B, Fasih T, Amonkar S, Pervaz M. Necrotising fasciitis of the breast: a rare but deadly disease. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2019; 65: 10–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rajakannu M, Kate V, Ananthakrishnan N. Necrotizing infection of the breast mimicking carcinoma. Breast J. 2006; 12: 266–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Alshareef B, Alsaleh N. Necrotizing fasciitis of the breast: case report with literature review. Case Rep. Surg. 2018; 2018: 1370680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lee JH, Lim YS, Kim NG, Lee KS, Kim JS. Primary necrotizing fasciitis of the breast in an untreated patient with diabetes. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2016; 43: 613–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wong C‐H, Tan B‐K. Necrotizing fasciitis of the breast. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008; 122: 151e–2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Flandrin A, Rouleau C, Azar CC, Dubon O, Giacalone PL. First report of a necrotising fasciitis of the breast following a core needle biopsy. Breast J. 2009; 15: 199–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
