Abstract
Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is the most common cause of ischemic stroke. Poor understanding of the disease due to limited human data leads to imprecise treatment. Apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE‐KO) rabbits were compared to an existing model, the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbit, and wild‐type New Zealand white (NZW) rabbit controls. Intracranial artery samples were assessed on histopathology for the presence of ICAD. Logistic and ordinal regression analyses were performed to assess for disease presence and severity, respectively. Eighteen rabbits and 54 artery segments were analyzed. Univariate logistic analysis confirmed the presence of ICAD in model rabbits (P < .001), while no difference was found between WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits (P = .178). In multivariate analysis, only classification as a model vs wild‐type animal (P < .001) was associated with the presence of ICAD. Univariate ordinal regression analysis demonstrated an association between ICAD severity and model animals (P = .001), with no difference was noted between WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits (P = .528). In multivariate ordinal regression analysis, only classification as a model retained significance (P < .001). ICAD can be reliably produced in ApoE‐KO rabbits, developing the disease comparably to the older WHHL model. Further analysis is warranted to optimize accelerated development of ICAD in ApoE‐KO rabbits to more efficiently study this disease.
Keywords: animal model, histopathology, intracranial atherosclerosis, ischemic stroke, vessel biology
1. INTRODUCTION
Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is the most common cause of stroke worldwide. 1 , 2 , 3 Pathophysiological mechanisms of ICAD have not been clarified in a way that is specific to intracranial disease, so current clinical management strategies are suboptimal. Better understanding of ICAD is needed through basic science and translational research to develop more effective treatment. A major hindrance in the study of ICAD pathophysiology is the lack of tissue for pathological evaluation, but this cannot be reliably obtained in humans. Biopsy is prohibitively morbid, so tissue is typically only obtained at autopsy.
Given limitations in human investigation of ICAD, current management is based on extrapolation from extracranial disease. Such extrapolation may be flawed since intracranial and extracranial vessels arise from different germ cell layers, ectoderm, and mesoderm, respectively, so it should not be assumed that these vessels and the diseases they may harbor are the same. 4 , 5 , 6 Several differences are known between intracranial and extracranial arteries, such as the presence or absence of vasa vasorum, size of adventitia, response to systemic processes like serum cholesterol or hypertensions, and their differential involvement in genetic disorders like familial hypercholesterolemia. 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 Further evaluation of ICAD is needed, including comparisons to extracranial disease that test the appropriateness of the current extrapolation from extracranial to intracranial vessels. Given the paucity of human data, an animal model is critically needed.
Animal models for the study of atherosclerosis have been reported in species as small as mice and as large as nonhuman primates, with most work occurring in rodent and rabbit models. 13 , 14 Apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE‐KO) mice have been shown to develop intracranial atherosclerosis; this approach is based on understanding of the plasma lipoprotein's role in cholesterol degradation and association with premature atherosclerosis in humans when deranged. 15 , 16 While useful for certain investigations, large animal models are necessary for better assessment with noninvasive imaging and surgical procedures that translate to human care. 14 , 17 As in humans, most rabbit atherosclerosis research involves extracranial vessels. The most widely studied rabbit model of atherosclerosis is the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbit. 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 WHHL rabbits develop ICAD, although some evidence exists that it typically only occurs after the induction of hypertension. 21 , 22 To date, most WHHL investigation has focused on extracranial disease, and the mutation underlying this strain is not associated with intracranial disease in humans. 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Additionally, in recent years, steady supply of these animals has not been maintained, so a better model of ICAD is needed. 23 Apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE‐KO) rabbits have been used for the evaluation of extracranial atherosclerosis, but they have not been evaluated for the presence of ICAD. 24 This study describes the comparisons of intracranial arteries in WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits with comparison to NZW controls.
2. METHODS
All studies were conducted in compliance with a protocol approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Mature WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits fed a regular or custom atherogenic diet (0.3% cholesterol, 3% soy bean oil, Envigo Teklad Diets), as well as younger NZW rabbits, were also analyzed. 23 WHHL rabbits were sourced from the Shiomi Laboratory at Kobe University. ApoE‐KO rabbits were provided by Horizon Discovery Group, which was subsequently acquired by Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, who also supplied NZW rabbits.
For euthanasia under general endotracheal anesthesia induced and maintaining with isoflurane, a midline neck incision was made over the trachea. The right carotid artery was isolated using blunt dissection; gentle tension was applied with vessel loops. A 22‐gauge intravenous catheter was inserted into the artery. A 5‐French micropuncture sheath was then placed in the artery over a 0.018 in microwire using Seldinger technique. This sheath was secured within the vessel with a 2‐0 silk suture. After removing the inner dilator and wire, the sheath was connected to the perfusion pump to deliver 2% paraformaldehyde and 5% glutaraldehyde solution. After initiating perfusion, a jugular vein was transected to limit blood in the vessels and tissues after exsanguination. Following adequate perfusion, the animal was decapitated to harvest the brain and its intact arteries, which were placed in formalin.
After at least 2 weeks in formalin, tissue was sliced to maximize cross‐sectional orientation of basilar and internal carotid arteries. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed and slides were created and studied with light microscopy. Internal carotid and basilar artery segments were each rated as having no, mild, moderate, or advanced ICAD. Severity was determined by histological findings including smooth muscle hypertrophy, wall thickening, infiltration of inflammatory cells, neointimal formation, presence of lipids within neointima, and remodeling of the vessel lumen.
Descriptive statistics were performed, assessing disease burden on a by‐segment basis. Further analysis was performed to compare animal features and disease burden. When assessing for the presence of disease, binary logistic regression analysis was performed. When assessing for severity of disease, ordinal regression analysis was performed. Multivariate models were constructed, including variables with P < .010 in univariate analysis, to assess for confounding factors. Statistics were performed using R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Eighteen rabbits (5 WHHL, 5 ApoE‐KO, and 8 NZW) and 54 artery segments underwent evaluation. Table 1 lists animal features and histopathology results for each segment. Representative images of various ICAD lesion severities are provided in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4. Univariate analysis confirmed the presence of ICAD in model rabbits compared to NZW rabbits (P < .001), with no difference between WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits (P = .178). ICAD was more commonly found in older (P = .003) and heavier (P = .001) rabbits and those fed a custom diet (P = .023). No association was noted for vessel segment (P = .127). A nonsignificant trend was noted for more disease occurrence in the posterior vs anterior circulation (0.079). In multivariate analysis assessing the presence of ICAD, only classification as a model (P < .001) was associated with the presence of ICAD. Figure 5 plots serum cholesterol results from animals 6, 8, and 10, which were tracked to observe response to custom diet.
Table 1.
Animal | Strain | Age(mos) | Sex | Mass(kg) | Diet | ICAD severity on pathology | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Right ICA | Left ICA | Basilar | ||||||
1 | WHHL | 28.0 | M | 2.66 | Regular | None | None | Mild |
2 | WHHL | 31.7 | F | 3.41 | Regular | None | None | Moderate |
3 | WHHL | 24.0 | M | 2.68 | Regular | None | None | Advanced |
4 | WHHL | 34.4 | F | 3.31 | Regular | None | None | None |
5 | WHHL | 25.6 | M | 3.8 | Regular | Mild | None | Moderate |
6 | ApoE | 47.0 | M | 4.4 | 5.0 mos, Custom | None | None | None |
7 | ApoE | 38.3 | M | 4.79 | 0.9 mos, Custom | Moderate | None | None |
8 | ApoE | 52.0 | F | 3.56 | 10.8 mos, Custom | None | Mild | Moderate |
9 | ApoE | 36.3 | M | 4.8 | Regular | None | Mild | Mild |
10 | ApoE | 46.1 | M | 4.33 | 4.9 mos, Custom | Mild | Mild | Mild |
11 | NZW | 8.1 | F | 3.49 | Regular | None | None | None |
12 | NZW | 10.6 | F | 3.37 | Regular | None | None | None |
13 | NZW | 7.1 | F | 4.28 | Regular | None | None | None |
14 | NZW | 21.5 | F | 2.9 | Regular | None | None | None |
15 | NZW | 9.9 | F | 3.56 | Regular | None | None | None |
16 | NZW | 7.7 | F | 3.59 | Regular | None | None | None |
17 | NZW | 7.7 | F | 2.4 | Regular | None | None | None |
18 | NZW | 27.6 | F | 4.33 | Regular | None | None | None |
Univariate ordinal regression analysis demonstrated an association between ICAD severity and model animals (P = .001), with no difference between WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits (P = .528). Severe ICAD was more common with advanced age (P = .056), greater mass (P = .016), and among those fed a custom diet (P = .005). More severe disease was noted in the posterior circulation (P = .045), although no association was found when looking at individual segments (P = .095). In a multivariate ordinal regression analysis, only classification as a model retained significance (P < .001).
Current ICAD management is based on extrapolation from extracranial disease in which systemic processes lead to lesion development at vulnerable locations like bifurcations points or bends in arteries, but little research has actually studied the intracranial vessels themselves. 25 , 26 Different germ cell layers give rise to intracranial and extracranial arteries. 4 , 5 , 6 If assumptions about ICAD can be made based on the understanding of extracranial disease, it must first be demonstrated that intracranial and extracranial vessels and diseases are in fact similar. Very little study has investigated differences between ICAD and extracranial atherosclerosis, yet management of ICAD still reflects extracranial disease management. There is acute need for better pathophysiological data on ICAD, but human investigations alone will not be sufficient. A robust animal model is sorely needed.
Most of the existing work on intracranial disease has occurred in WHHL rabbits. These animals lack low‐density lipoprotein receptors, which in turn leads to the development of atherosclerosis. 14 , 18 , 19 , 27 , 28 Research on WHHL rabbits led to the discovery of the underlying mutation causing familial hypercholesterolemia. 19 ICAD typically does not occur in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, and the overwhelming majority of ICAD patients do not suffer from this rare disease, so WHHL rabbits may not be an appropriate ICAD model. 29 , 30 , 31 Additionally, WHHL rabbits have poor general health. ICAD is reported to occur most reliably only after hypertension induction; this may further complicate the health of these fragile animals and prevent reliable long‐term analysis. 21 , 22
Other methods of atherosclerosis induction exist for rabbits. 14 ApoE is involved in lipid transport and has been targeted for disease models in multiple species; knockout rabbits can now be selectively bred. 24 , 32 , 33 Our research sought to assess ApoE‐KO rabbits as a model of ICAD, comparing them to WHHL rabbits and NZW controls. Based on previously reported methods and with the aim to accentuate and accelerate any ICAD development, most ApoE animals were fed moderately atherogenic diets during exploratory investigation to find a replacement for WHHL rabbits when they became unavailable. 14 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 Variability in exposure to the custom diet resulted from different timeframes between acquisition and euthanasia, and some animals refused to eat the custom pellets and had to be switched to standard feed. Both WHHL and ApoE‐KO rabbits were found to have ICAD, while no NZW control animals harbored the disease. It is notable that WHHL animals reliably developed the disease without hypertension induction.
Several limitations of this preliminary analysis warrant discussion. Most ApoE‐KO animals received an atherogenic diet, whereas WHHL and NZW counterparts received regular diets. Due to logistical issues, NZW control animals were notably younger; age implications should be explored further in future research. Currently, it can reasonably be expected that disease only occurs late in the animal's life, so methods should be sought to accelerate the course of the disease to make efficient evaluation of the entire natural history more practical. In total, ApoE‐KO rabbits likely represent the most suitable ICAD model moving forward. Further robust investigation of ApoE‐KO rabbits to model ICAD is critically needed to lead to more effective treatments for this debilitating disease. This model can help shed light on recently described processes affecting extracranial atherosclerosis like inflammation, transcriptomic features, noncoding RNA, and neutrophil extracellular traps, specifically investigating the intracranial circulation to develop the next generation of diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All the authors participated in animal care, including perfusion fixation. MDA performed statistical analysis and authored the manuscript. Other authors edited the manuscript and approved the final version.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded in part by the American Heart Association Transformational Grant 19TPA34910194 and The Joe Niekro Research Grant from the Joe Niekro Foundation and Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Foundation.
Zabriskie MS, Wang C, Wang S, Alexander MD. Apolipoprotein E knockout rabbit model of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Anim Models Exp Med. 2020;3:208–213. 10.1002/ame2.12125
REFERENCES
- 1. Wong LKS. Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. 2006;1:158‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Caplan LR, Gorelick PB, Hier DB. Race, sex and occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a review. Stroke. 1986;17:648‐655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke. 2014;45:663‐669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, ter Brugge KG. Clinical Vascular Anatomy and Variations. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Postiglione A, Nappi A, Brunetti A, et al. Relative protection from cerebral atherosclerosis of young patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 1991;90:23‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Alexander MD, De Havenon AH, Mossa‐Basha M, McNally JS. How far can we take vessel wall MRI? The tissue is still the issue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:E30‐E31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Baker AB, Resch JA, Loewenson RB. Hypertension and cerebral atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1969;39:701‐710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sadoshima S, Kurozumi T, Tanaka K, et al. Cerebral and aortic atherosclerosis in Hisayama, Japan. Atherosclerosis. 1980;36:117‐126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H, et al. A major role for VCAM‐1, but not ICAM‐1, in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1255‐1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Li H, Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MA, Libby P. Inducible expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 by vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro and within rabbit atheroma. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:1551‐1559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Michalska M, Machtoub L, Manthey HD, et al. Visualization of vascular inflammation in the atherosclerotic mouse by ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1‐specific nanoparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:2350‐2357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kim JS, Caplan LR, Wong KS. Intracranial Atherosclerosis. Oxford, UK: Wiley; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Emini Veseli B, Perrotta P, De Meyer GRA, et al. Animal models of atherosclerosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;816:3‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yanni AE. The laboratory rabbit: an animal model of atherosclerosis research. Lab Anim. 2004;38:246‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sigovan M, Kaye E, Lancelot E, et al. Anti‐inflammatory drug evaluation in ApoE‐/‐ mice by ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:546‐552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Horejsí B, Ceska R. Apolipoproteins and atherosclerosis. Apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein(a) as candidate genes of premature development of atherosclerosis. Physiol Res. 2000;49(Suppl 1):S63‐S69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Binderup T, Duivenvoorden R, Fay F, et al. Imaging‐assisted nanoimmunotherapy for atherosclerosis in multiple species. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaaw7736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Aliev G, Burnstock G. Watanabe rabbits with heritable hypercholesterolaemia: a model of atherosclerosis. Histol Histopathol. 1998;13:797‐817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Goldstein JL, Kita T, Brown MS. Defective lipoprotein receptors and atherosclerosis. Lessons from an animal counterpart of familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:288‐296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang Z, Zhang J, Li H, et al. Hyperlipidemia‐associated gene variations and expression patterns revealed by whole‐genome and transcriptome sequencing of rabbit models. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ito T, Shiomi M. Cerebral atherosclerosis occurs spontaneously in homozygous WHHL rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 2001;156:57‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kong J, Tamaki N, Asada M. Early lesions of cerebral atherosclerosis from induced hypertension in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Kobe J Med Sci. 2000;46:87‐101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zabriskie M, Wang S, Kim S, et al. New Zealand white rabbits fed high cholesterol diets develop morbid systemic diseases before intracranial atherosclerosis is detected. J Vet Sci Med Diagn. 2019;8:3. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ji D, Zhao G, Songstad A, Cui X, Weinstein EJ. Efficient creation of an APOE knockout rabbit. Transgenic Res. 2015;24:227‐235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Stoll G, Bendszus M. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: novel insights into plaque formation and destabilization. Stroke. 2006;37:1923‐1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK; Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothrombosis . Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2129‐2138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rosenfeld ME, Tsukada T, Gown AM, Ross R. Fatty streak initiation in Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipemic and comparably hypercholesterolemic fat‐fed rabbits. Arteriosclerosis. 1987;7:9‐23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shiomi M, Ito T, Shiraishi M, Watanabe Y. Inheritability of atherosclerosis and the role of lipoproteins as risk factors in the development of atherosclerosis in WHHL rabbits: risk factors related to coronary atherosclerosis are different from those related to aortic atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1992;96:43‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ding X, Li C, Yu K, et al. Different risk factors between intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in Asian population: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Neurosci. 2014;124:834‐840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Qureshi AI, Caplan LR. Intracranial atherosclerosis. Lancet. 2014;383:984‐998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lindenholz A, van der Kolk AG, van der Schaaf IC, et al. Intracranial atherosclerosis assessed with 7‐T MRI: evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Radiology. 2020;295:162‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Brousseau ME, Hoeg JM. Transgenic rabbits as models for atherosclerosis research. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:365‐375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Taylor JM, Fan J. Transgenic rabbit models for the study of atherosclerosis. Front Biosci. 1997;2:d298‐308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kato H, Tokunaga O, Watanabe T, Sunaga T. Experimental cerebral atherosclerosis in the rabbit. Scanning electron microscopic study of the initial lesion site. Pathol Res Pract. 1991;187:797‐805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Abela GS, Picon PD, Friedl SE, et al. Triggering of plaque disruption and arterial thrombosis in an atherosclerotic rabbit model. Circulation. 1995;91:776‐784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Worthley SG, Helft G, Fuster V, et al. Serial in vivo MRI documents arterial remodeling in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2000;101:586‐589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Aikawa M, Rabkin E, Okada Y, et al. Lipid lowering by diet reduces matrix metalloproteinase activity and increases collagen content of rabbit atheroma: a potential mechanism of lesion stabilization. Circulation. 1998;97:2433‐2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]