Skip to main content
Current Health Sciences Journal logoLink to Current Health Sciences Journal
. 2020 Mar 31;46(1):66–71. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.46.01.09

Histopathological Features of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Allergic Polyps

IRINA ENACHE 1, ELENA IONIȚĂ 2, MIHAELA MITROI 2, FLORIN ANGHELINA 2, CARMEN MOGOANTĂ 2, SORIN CIOLOFAN 2, ALINA CĂPITĂNESCU 2, ALEX STEPAN 3, CRISTIANA SIMIONESCU 3
PMCID: PMC7323723  PMID: 32637167

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps of allergic etiology is one of the most common pathology in the ENT sphere that affect a significant percentage of population. The paper aims to establish the involvement of the allergic component in the genesis of nasal polyposis. The study included 150 nasal polyps from patients hospitalized and operated in the ENT Department of Craiova’s Clinical Emergency County Hospital. The biological material was fixed in 10% buffered formalin, processed by classical paraffin embedding technique followed by hematoxylin-eosin staining and it was interpreted in the Pathology Department of the same hospital. We evaluated a number of histopathological parameters that were given severity scores. The most common changes at epithelial level were: basal layer hyperplasia observed in 87 cases (58%), goblet cell hyperplasia in 121 cases (80.66%), basal membrane thickening with values between 10-42μm corresponding to a number of 118 cases (78.66%). The most important stromal changes were edema in 88% and infiltration with eosinophils 100%, indicating the allergic nature of this disease.

Keywords: nasal polyposis, histopathology, eosinophils

Introduction

The pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis, whether or not associated with polyps, is very complex and involves activation and migration of inflammatory cells, vasodilation, growth and changes in glandular activity, activation of nerve endings triggering neurogenic inflammation and mucosal remodeling morphologically identifiable [1].

Chronic rhinosinusitis includes multiple phenotypic expressions, but based on clinical and histological differences, four subtypes can be outlined: chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyps and chronic non-eosinophilic rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyps [2,3,4,5,6,7,8].

Allergic rhinitis has different etiologies, but a common feature, represented by inflammation dominated by eosinophils, the degree of eosinophilic infiltration of tissues being an important factor in the recurrence rate of nasal polyps [9,10].

Although eosinophils dominate the inflammatory infiltrate of chronic rhinosinusitis, especially that with nasal polyps [11], many other types of inflammatory cells, including neutrophils, mast cells, lymphocytes and plasma cells also play important roles in the pathogenesis of the disease [12,13].

We followed the changes of surface epithelium and stroma of polyps in relation to their severity.

Material and Method

The present study included 150 cases of sino-nasal polyps obtained by endoscopic polypectomy, from patients admitted and operated in the ENT (Ear Nose Throat) Department of the Clinical Emergency County Hospital of Craiova.

The surgical specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, subjected to usual processing by paraffin inclusion and hematoxylin-eosin staining.

For the selected cases we assessed a series of histopathological parameters that were given specific scores according to similar studies in literature [14,15,16] (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of cases by lining epithelium and stromal changes.

Histopathological parameters No. cases The degree of injury

0

1

2

3

Epithelial changes

Hyperplasia of the basal layer

87

63

51

21

15

Squamous metaplasia

15

135

9

6

0

Goblet cell hyperplasia

109

41

58

43

8

Alteration of the epithelium

44

106

32

12

0

Infiltration with eosinophils

16

134

11

4

1

Thickening of basal membranes

118

32

89

27

2

Stromal changes Edema

132

18

40

57

35

Infiltration with eosinophils

150

0

71

62

17

Lymphocyte infiltration

74

76

42

32

0

Plasma cells infiltration

89

61

52

32

5

Macrophage infiltration

11

139

7

3

1

- epithelial compartment: basal membrane thickening: 0 (<9μm), 1 (10-19μm), 2 (20-29μm), 3 (≥30μm); goblet cell hyperplasia: 0 (<3 cells), 1 (3-10 cells), 2 (11-20 cells), 3 (>20 cells); epithelial infiltration with eosinophils: 0 (0 cells), 1 (1-2 cells), 2 (3-10 cells), 3 (≥11 cells); basal layer hyperplasia: 0 (absent), 1 (focal), 2 (zonal), 3 (diffuse); squamous metaplasia: 0 (absent), 1 (focal), 2 (zonal), 3 (diffuse); stromal edema: 0 (absent), 1 (focal), 2 (zonal), 3 (diffuse); epithelial alteration: 0 (absent), 1 (partial denudation), 2 (complete denudation);

- stromal compartment: eosinophilic infiltration: 0 (0 cells), 1 (1-3 cells), 2 (4-15 cells), 3 (>15 cells); stromal infiltration with lymphocytes: 0 (<10 cells), 1 (11-30 cells), 2 (31-50 cells), 3 (>50 cells); stromal infiltration with plasma cells: 0 (<10 cells), 1 (11-30 cells), 2 (31-50 cells), 3 (>50 cells); stromal infiltration with macrophages: 0 (0 cells), 1 (1-2 cells), 2 (3-9 cells), 3 (≥10 cells).

Basal membrane thickness was evaluated at 100x objective, using the graded scale attached to Panthera L. Hyperplasia of goblet cells, epithelial infiltration with eosinophils, stromal infiltration with eosinophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages, were evaluated with 10 fields/x100, Panthera L binocular microscope with built-in digital camera (MOTIC manufacturer) and microscope integrated software (for mobile devices running Android and IOS for "live" viewing of the microscope image and image acquisition, morphometry and annotation).

The statistical analysis was performed using the incidence tables and the chi-square comparison test (χ2) within Microsoft Excel 2010, the p values under 0.05 being considered significant. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of U.M.F. of Craiova, and the patients/or their caretakers gave a written informed consent regarding the publication of the data.

Results

The present study included 150 cases of allergic polyps, for which we assessed a series of histopathological parameters at both lining epithelium and stromal level (Table 1).

Regarding the changes produced at the surface epithelium, we found that most of the polyps analyzed were covered by cylindrical pseudostratified epithelium, but we frequently observed aspects of basal layer hyperplasia (58%), often with focal pattern, but also with epithelial denudation frequently on restricted areas (29.3%), and less frequently squamous metaplasia (10%) with focal pattern.

Also, we found in more than three quarters of cases the goblet cell hyperplasia (72.6%) frequently moderate and rarely with formation of intraepithelial glands or even small mucous cysts (Figures 1A, 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Allergic polyp: A. Hyperplasia of the basal layer, goblet cell hyperplasia and eosinophil infiltration, HE staining, x100; B. Hyperplasia of the basal layer and basal membrane (BM) thickening, HE staining, x40; C. Hyperplasia of the basal layer and BM thickening, HE staining, x100; D. Hyperplasia of the basal layer, BM thickening and stromal infiltration with eosinophils, HE staining, x100; E. Edema and inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils, lymphocytes and plasma cells HE staining, x40; F. Edema and inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils, plasma cells, lymphocytes and macrophages, HE staining, x100.

Another frequently observed change was the slight thickening of the basal membranes in more than half of all cases (78.6%) (Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D).

Only rarely have we seen epithelial infiltration with eosinophils (10.6%), predominantly with low intensity.

Stromal changes were represented by edema and inflammatory cells infiltration.

The stromal edema frequently observed (88%) had different degrees, but frequently more pronounced subepithelial (Figures 1E, 1F).

Stromal eosinophilic infiltration was consistently present, often with moderate or reduced intensity.

Along with eosinophils, we also noticed other inflammatory cells such as plasma cells (59.3%) and lymphocytes (49.3%) and only rarely macrophages (7.3%) (Figures 1D,1E, 1F).

The analysis of the distribution of cases with respect to epithelial changes indicated statistically significant differences of the alteration of the epithelium and thickening of basal membranes (p <0.001, χ2 test) in the sense of the predominance of the first parameter for negative scores (score 0) and of the second one. second parameter for positive scores (score 1-3) (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cases distribution depending on: A. alteration of the epithelium and thickening of basal membrane; B. hyperplasia of the basal layer and goblet cell hyperplasia; C. alteration of the epithelium and infiltration with eosinophils; D. infiltration with eosinophils and lymphocyte infiltration; E. infiltration with eosinophils and plasma cells infiltration; F. infiltration with eosinophils and macrophage infiltration

The analysis of the distribution of hyperplasia of the basal layer and goblet cell hyperplasia indicated the predominance of the basal changes for the negative or maximum scores, respectively scores 0 or 3 and of the changes related to the goblet cells for the intermediate scores, respectively scores 1-2. (p=0.002, χ2 test) (Figure 2B).

Epithelial infiltration with eosinophils predominated for the negative cases (score 0), while alteration of the epithelium was more frequent for the positive cases (score 1-3), differences that were statistically significant (p<0.001, χ2 test) (Figure 2C).

In the stromal compartment, we observed the predominance of eosinophils in relation to lymphocyte infiltration (p <0.001, χ2 test) (Figure 2D), eosinophils infiltration (p <0.001, χ2 test) (Figure 2E) and macrophage infiltration (p <0.001, χ2 test) (Figure 2D), for all positive scores (scores 1-3).

In this study, the alteration of the epithelium, thickening of the basal membrane, hyperplasia of the basal layer and goblet cell hyperplasia, along with eosinophilic infiltration at the epithelial and stromal level seem to be the most specific changes of the allergic nasal polyps.

Discussions

The allergic polyp is the most common variety of nasal polyp, present in 86% of cases, histologically characterized by pronounced hyperplasia of the goblet cells, thickening of the basal membrane with hyalinization, presence of eosinophils and mast cells in stroma, together with edema [17,18,19].

The covering epithelium of the allergic-type nasal polyps may be a normal respiratory mucosa or it may be partially or completely denuded [20].

In addition, it may express various changes such as basal layer hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, goblet cell hyperplasia and infiltration with inflammatory cells, especially with eosinophils [18,21,22].

The aspects described in literature were identified in the studied cases, the most frequent being hyperplasia of the basal layer, hyperplasia of goblet cells and thickening of the basal membrane.

The association of basal hyperplasia and squamous metaplasia with nasal polyps is frequently mentioned in different studies, sometimes even with dysplasia-type changes [23].

In our study the hyperplasia of the basal layer was found in more than half of cases, but squamous metaplasia appeared only in a small number of cases with focal pattern.

Goblet cell hyperplasia together with squamous metaplasia are among the most common epithelial changes in nasal polyps [24,25,26,16,27].

Regarding the analysis of goblet cells, we found a great variation of associated phenomena, starting from rare mucous cells to a true formation of intraepithelial glands or cystic mucosal formations.

Alteration of the epithelium by superficial or complete erosion, up to the basal membrane level, has often been mentioned in different studies [28].

In the present study, we noticed the alteration of epithelium covering the polyps from its partial to complete denudation.

In only 16 cases (10.6%), we noticed the infiltration of the epithelium with eosinophils from those analyzed, with a frequency of a limited number of 1-2 cells/x100 corresponding to grade 1.

The thickening of basement membrane is the result of a dense fibrosis that occurs primarily in the lamina reticularis [29]. This configuration was encountered in 118 cases (78.6%), the thickness of the basal membrane varying between 10-42μ.

In another study, thickening of the basement membrane was frequently identified in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, in 95% of patients the thickening of the basement membrane was >20μm [30].

There were no apparent differences in the severity of epithelial lesions and the thickening of basement membrane in the allergic patients compared to the non-allergic ones, nor the differences between the patients with or without asthma [30].

In this study at the epithelial level, the thickening of the basement membrane predominated in relation to the alteration of the epithelium, goblet cell hyperplasia in relation to hyperplasia of the basal layer and the infiltration of eosinophils in relation to the alteration of the epithelium.

The major changes identified in the stroma of the nasal polyps are inflammatory infiltrate into the lamina propria and stromal edema, sometimes associated with focal fibrosis [31,32].

In our study we found the presence of stromal edema in 88% of cases, more pronounced below the epithelium and in a moderate quantity.

In a different study, the authors reported similar aspects, more than half of cases presenting moderate edema [16].

In all the cases analyzed with different characteristics we found the presence of stromal infiltration with eosinophils, which predominated in relation to infiltration with lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages. In the normal nasal mucosa there are no eosinophils or they are very rare, but in literature, there is no consensus on the value of normal tissue eosinophilia.

However, several studies consider that the minimum number for eosinophilia is 5 eosinophils/x40 in absolute quantification, and 5% as a percentage compared to the control group, which presented on average below 2 eosinophils/x 400 [33,34,35].

The density of these cells varies for different polyps, and even in different areas of the same polyp and this variability is in accordance with the dynamics of the polyp process [36].

Conclusions

The histopathological analysis allows the detailed highlighting of the heterogeneity of epithelial and stromal changes, especially of different populations of inflammatory cells involved in the pathogenesis of this disease.

The most important stromal changes were edema and eosinophilic infiltration, in accord with the allergic nature of the disease.

The presence of intraepithelial as well as stromal eosinophils probably plays a role in the process of remodeling the mucosa of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Further studies are needed to understand the correlations between histopathological features and the evolution of the disease.

Conflict of interests

None to declare.

References

  • 1.Klimek L, Böttcher I. Was passiert bei der allergischen Rhinitis in der Nasenschleimhaut. DMW-Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2008;133(S 03):S88–S94. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czerny MS, Namin A, Gratton MA, Antisdel JL. Histopathological and clinical analysis of chronic rhinosinusitis by subtype. Int Forum Allergy Rh. 2014;4(6):463–469. doi: 10.1002/alr.21304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao PP, Zhang YN, Liao B, Ma J, Wang BF, Wang H, Zeng M, Liu WH, Schleimer RP, Liu Z. Increased local IgE production induced by common aeroallergens and phenotypic alteration of mast cells in Chinese eosinophilic, but not non-eosinophilic, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(5):690–700. doi: 10.1111/cea.12304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Snidvongs K, Chin D, Sacks R, Earls P, Harvey RJ. Eosinophilic rhinosinusitis is not a disease of ostiomeatal occlusion. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1070–1074. doi: 10.1002/lary.23721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang MJ, Zhou B, Li YC, Huang Q. The role of peripheral blood eosinophil percentage in classification of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;48(8):650–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ouyang Y, Fan E, Li Y, Wang X, Zhang L. Clinical characteristics and expression of thymic stromal lymphopoetin in eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2013;75(1):37–45. doi: 10.1159/000346929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeong WJ, Lee CH, Cho SH, Rhee CS. Eosinophilic allergic polyp: a clinically oriented concept of nasal polyp. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(2):241–246. doi: 10.1177/0194599810391738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ishitoya J, Sakuma Y, Tsukuda M. Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis in Japan. Allergol Int. 2010;59(3):239–245. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.10-RAI-0231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Settipane GA. Nasal polyps: pathology, immunology and treatment. Am J Rhinol. 1987;1:119–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mygind N, Dahl R, Bachert C. Nasal polyposis, eosinophil dominated inflammation, and allergy. Thorax. 2000;55(Suppl 2):S79–S83. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_2.S79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P, Georgalas C, Goossens H, Harvey R, Hellings P, Hopkins C, Jones N, Joos G, Kalogjera L, Kern B, Kowalski M, Price D, Riechelmann H, Schlosser R, Senior B, Thomas M, Toskala E, Voegels R, Wang de Y, Wormald PJ. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. Rhinology. 2012;23:1–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ikeda K, Shiozawa A, Ono N, Kusunoki T, Hirotsu M, Homma H, Saitoh T, Murata J. Subclassification of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp based on eosinophil and neutrophil. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):E1–E9. doi: 10.1002/lary.24154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nguyen LH, Fakhri S, Frenkiel S, Hamid QA. Molecular immunology and immunotherapy for chronic sinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2003;3(6):505–512. doi: 10.1007/s11882-003-0062-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ardehali MM, Amali A, Bakhshaee M, Madani Z, Amiri M. The comparison of histopathological characteristics of polyps in asthmatic and nonasthmatic patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(5):748–751. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Cho DY. Histopathologic characteristics of chronic sinusitis with bronchial asthma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125(2):169–176. doi: 10.1080/00016480410015767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kule AZ, Deveci HS, Kule M, Erden Habeflo¤lu T, Somay A, Gürsel AO. The correlation of clinical measures with the histopathological findings in nasal polyposis. ENT Updates. 2015;5(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al Jobran BS, Alotaibi AE, Asiri AY, Alhayyani RM, Almanie NI. Nasal Polyps and its Histo-pathological Evaluation. Egyptian J HospMed. 2018;70(11):2022–2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hellquist HB. Nasal polyps update. Histopathology. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1996;17(5):237–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Couto LGF, Fernades AM, Brandão DF, de Santi Neto D, Valera FCP, Anselmo-Lima WT. Histological Aspects of Rhinosinusal Polyps. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2008;74(2):207–212. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31090-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumar S, Singh R, Prasad S, Nag S. Cytohistological Findings in Allergic Rhinitis. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2014;13(7):26–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Figueiredo CR, Silva ID, Weckx LL. Inflammatory genes in nasal polyposis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16(1):18–21. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f363f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pawliczak R, Lewandowska-Polak A, Kowalski ML. Pathogenesis of nasal polyps: an update. Curr Allergy Asthma. 2005;5(6):463–471. doi: 10.1007/s11882-005-0027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baird AR, Hilmi O, White PS, Robertson AJ. Epithelial atypia and squamous metaplasia in nasal polyps. J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112(8):755–757. doi: 10.1017/s002221510014160x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tos M, Larsen PL, Møller K. Goblet cell density in nasal polyps. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99(4 Pt 1):310–315. doi: 10.1177/000348949009900413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takeuchi K, Majima Y. Remodeling in Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyps. Allerg Int. 2005;54:39–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kitapçi F, Muluk NB, Atasoy P, Koc C. Role of mast and goblet cells in the pathogenesis of nasal polyps. J Otolaryngol. 2006;35(2):122–132. doi: 10.2310/7070.2005.5004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Du J, Ba L, Li B, Liu F, Hu X, Zhang J, Liu Y, Xian J, Liu S, Li H. Distinct expression of NK2 homeobox 1 (NKX2-1) and goblet cell hyperplasia in nasal polyps with different endotypes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(7):690–698. doi: 10.1002/alr.21932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Larsen PL, Tos M. Nasal polyps: epithelium and goblet cell density. Laryngoscope. 1989;99(12):1274–1280. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198912000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jeffery PK, Godfrey RW, Adelroth E, Nelson F, Rogers A, Johansson SA. Effects of treatment on airway inflammation and thickness of basement membrane reticular collagen in asthma: a quantitative light and electron microscopic study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(4 Pt 1):890–899. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.4_Pt_1.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kephart GM, Kern EB, Gaffey TA, Tarara JE, Kita H. Features of airway remodeling and eosinophilic inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis: is the histopathology similar to asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(5):877–882. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kakoi H, Hiraide F. A histological study of formation and growth of nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol. 1987;103(1-2):137–144. doi: 10.3109/00016488709134709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fan GK, Wang H, Takenaka H. Eosinophil infi ltration and activation in nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(5):521–526. doi: 10.1080/00016480600951368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jankowski R, Bouchoua F, Coffinet L, Vignaud JM. Clinical factors influencing the eosinophil infiltration of nasal polyps. Rhinology. 2002;40(4):173–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prades JM, Chelikh L, Dumollard JM, Merzougui N, Timoshenko A, Marti C. Nasal polyposis: Quantification of the eosinophil and granulocyte infiltrates Anatomo-clinical correlations. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2003;120(5):279–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garín L, Miguel Armengot, José Ramón Alba, Cardab Carmen. Correlations between Clinical and Histological Aspects in Nasal Polyposis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008;59(7):315–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Larsen P, Tos M. Anatomic site of origin of nasal polyps: endoscopic nasal and paranasal sinus surgery as a screening method for nasal polyps in autopsy material. Am J Rhinol. 1996;10(4):210–216. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Health Sciences Journal are provided here courtesy of Editura Medicală Universitară

RESOURCES