Abstract
Several pretreatment variables such as elevated glucose and hypoperfusion severity are related to brain hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of acute stroke. We evaluated whether elevated glucose and severe hypoperfusion have synergistic effects in the promotion of parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We included 258 patients MT-treated who had a pretreatment computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and a post-treatment follow-up MRI. Severe hypoperfusion was defined as regions with cerebral blood volume (CBV) values < 2.5% of normal brain [very-low CBV (VLCBV)-regions]. Median baseline glucose levels were 119 (IQR = 105–141) mg/dL. Thirty-nine (15%) patients had pretreatment VLCBV-regions, and 42 (16%) developed a PH after MT. In adjusted models, pretreatment glucose levels interacted significantly with VLCBV on the prediction of PH (p-interaction = 0.011). In patients with VLCBV-regions, higher glucose was significantly associated with PH (adjusted-OR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.08–9.19, p = 0.036), whereas this association was not significant in patients without VLCBV-regions. CBV values measured at pretreatment CTP in coregistered regions that developed PH or infarct at follow-up were not correlated with pretreatment glucose levels, thus suggesting the existence of alternative deleterious mechanisms other than direct glucose-driven hemodynamic impairments. Overall, these results suggest that both severe hypoperfusion and glucose levels should be considered in the evaluation of adjunctive neuroprotective strategies.
Subject terms: Neurology, Stroke
Introduction
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the most effective treatment for stroke patients with acute large-vessel occlusions in the carotid territory1,2. However, about half of MT-treated patients do not achieve an adequate clinical recovery at follow-up even despite complete recanalization1,2. One of the pathophysiological processes that has been implicated in the lack of response to recanalization therapies is the risk of hemorrhagic transformation due to blood–brain barrier disruption3,4. Indeed, among patients with anterior circulation stroke undergoing endovascular therapy, the presence of hemorrhagic transformation in follow-up neuroimaging, especially in the form of parenchymal hematomas (PH), has been associated with poor long term functional outcome5,6.
The presence of PH in post-treatment neuroimaging occurs in 5 to 16% of acute stroke patients treated with MT and has been related with several pretreatment variables including severe hypoperfusion and hyperglycemia7,8. The presence of brain regions with very low cerebral blood volume (VLCBV) in pretreatment computed tomography perfusion (CTP) has been consistently associated with the risk of hemorrhagic transformation although the sensitivity and positive predictive values of risk estimations are relatively low compared with its high specificity and negative predictive values9–11. Accordingly, severe hypoperfusion might not be a sufficient risk factor for the occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation and additional concurrent susceptibility conditions might be needed, such as pretreatment hyperglycemia. The presence of hyperglycemia at stroke onset has been associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation after reperfusion therapies as well as with significant reductions on the benefits of MT4,12,13. The potential mechanisms contributing to exacerbated neurovascular injury and poor outcomes are multifactorial and include augmented oxidative and nitrosative stress, tissue acidosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, thromboinflammation and impairment of cerebral perfusion, among others14,15. However, in preclinical models the interaction between hyperglycemia and reduced cerebral blood volume or blood flow during ischemia and at reperfusion is controversial16–23.
Herein, we aimed to evaluate whether elevated glucose levels modify the association between severe hypoperfusion and hemorrhagic transformation after MT and to describe whether this association might be explained by glucose-driven hemodynamic impairments before reperfusion.
Methods
Patients
Patients were part of a prospectively collected clinical registry of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapies in a single Comprehensive Stroke Center. The study population included consecutive patients with occlusions in the carotid territory treated with endovascular recanalization therapy between March 2010 and December 2017. Additional inclusion criteria for this analysis were: 1/the availability of a technically adequate pretreatment whole-brain CTP scan, and 2/the availability of a post-treatment follow-up MRI for evaluating the development of hemorrhagic transformation. A total of 258 patients fulfilled these criteria and were finally included in the study (Supplementary Fig. S1 online). MT was performed according to contemporary guidelines in patients with a proximal artery occlusion on CT angiography and a pretreatment ASPECTS equal or higher than 6, as previously reported11. Final vessel patency was graded on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at the end of MT according to the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score and successful recanalization was defined as a grade 2b-3. The study protocol was approved by the local Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (registration number HCB/2019/0805) under the requirements of Spanish legislation in the field of biomedical research, the protection of personal data (15/1999) and the standards of Good Clinical Practice, as well as with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Participants in the study consented for storage of their data in a local database for the purpose of research that was declared into a Web-based registry that satisfied all legal requirements for protection of personal data, for monitoring by the Catalan Health Department.
Patients were admitted into a Stroke Unit and the Trial of Org 10,172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria was used to classify all qualifying strokes after diagnostic workup. Clinical data was prospectively collected including: demographics, laboratory tests, risk factors, concomitant therapies, neuroimaging, clinical course and functional outcome. Neurological status was monitored with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and functional outcome was quantified using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months3.
CTP imaging analysis
Patients were scanned using a SIEMENS Somatom Definition Flash 128-section dual-source multidetector scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), with a 98 mm z-coverage and a total acquisition time of 60 s (31 time points), as previously described11. The imaging protocol included a baseline multimodal whole-brain CT scan, which included a Non-Contrast CT (NCCT), a CT angiography and a CTP. Pretreatment ASPECTS was assessed on NCCT, and good collaterals were defined as collateral supply filling > 50% of the occluded arterial territory24. CTP maps were calculated by commercial software MIStar (Apollo Medical Imaging Technology, Melbourne, Australia) using a model-free singular value decomposition algorithm with a delay and dispersion correction. The software generates cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT) and Delay Time (DT) maps. An image processing pipeline using in-house fully-automated software running in Matlab (v.2017b, Mathworks, Natick, MA) was developed in order to extract perfusion volumes. An absolute threshold of 3 s was selected on the DT map to obtain the hypoperfused tissue (perfusion lesion)11. Ischemic core was extracted on CBF maps after applying a threshold of relative CBF < 30%. VLCBV was defined as values on CBV maps lower than 2.5% of normal brain in the contralateral hemisphere with a volume of at least 1.5 mL11.
Follow-up MRI
After MT, a follow-up MRI was performed within a median of 41 h (IQR 26–69 h) of hospital admission. The MRI included diffusion-weighted images and Gradient-Echo T2*-weighted sequences. The bleeding complications were scored on follow-up Gradient-Echo T2*-weighted sequences by 2 experienced stroke neurologists (A.R. and S.A.) according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria as hemorrhagic infarction (HI) and PH type 1 and type 225. In brief, PH1 was defined as bleeding ≤ 30% of the infarcted area with mild space-occupying effect, and PH2 as bleeding > 30% of the infarcted area, with space-occupying effect. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as any PHs associated with an increment of at least 4 points in the NIHSS score. Investigators blinded to clinical data and baseline CTP analysis evaluated in consensus the post-treatment imaging studies. To perform a CTP-MRI regions of interest analysis each CTP map was coregistered to the corresponding follow-up DWI using a rigid coregistration protocol (6-degrees of freedom) implemented with statistical parametric mapping (SPM12, Functional Imaging Laboratory, University College London, London, UK). An extended description of the imaging methods can be found in the Suplementary methods.
Statistics
Continuous variables were reported as mean (standard deviation, SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) and were compared with the Student t test, ANOVA, Mann–Whitney, or Kruskal–Wallis tests as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared with the χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Univariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between VLCBV-regions, glucose levels and their interaction on the risk of PH and with other predefined clinical endpoints. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust the estimations for the effect of confounders based on exploratory analysis (p < 0.05 on univariate analysis) and avoidance of collinearity. A backwards-stepwise procedure was implemented to reach the final models constructed for assessing the role of pretreatment glucose levels on the risk of PH in subgroups defined by VLCBV regions in order to avoid overfitting. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to assess final model fit. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the most accurate cutoff point (Youden's index) of pretreatment glucose levels for the prediction of PH. To evaluate the relationship between glucose levels and CBV values a set of regression models were used including linear, logarithmic, quadratic and cubic curve estimations. The analyses were performed using SPSS Version 22.0 and the level of significance was established at the 0.05 level (2-sided).
Results
Baseline traits of the included population according to PH occurrence
Overall, 258 patients with a median (IQR) NIHSS 17 (10–20) at admission and treated with MT within a median (IQR) of 231 (161–334) minutes from stroke onset were included in the study. Median (IQR) baseline glucose levels were 119 (105–141) mg/dL (6.6 mmol/L [5.8–7.8] mmol/L). Thirty-nine (15%) patients had pretreatment VLCBV-regions, and 42 (16%) developed a PH in follow-up neuroimaging [30 (12%) had PH1 and 12 (5%) had PH2]. Histograms showing the distribution of pretreatment glucose levels and the volume of regions with VLCBV are shown in the Supplementary Figure S2 online, and the baseline traits of the population according to the presence of VLCBV regions are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Table 1 provides descriptive data on baseline clinical and radiological variables associated with the occurrence of PH. In univariate analysis, PH was associated with a higher baseline stroke severity (NIHSS and ASPECTS score), a larger volume of ischemic tissue with VLCBV, a higher proportion of VLCBV regions, cardioembolic stroke etiology, as well as longer times from stroke onset to CTP acquisition, MT onset and successful recanalization. The presence of PH at follow-up was associated with increased odds for shifting to worse mRS score categories (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.08–3.30, p = 0.025).
Table 1.
No PH N = 216 |
PH N = 42 |
p | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years), median (IQR) | 72 (61–80) | 67 (59–79) | 0.481 |
Males, n (%) | 106 (49) | 26 (62) | 0.128 |
Hypertension, n (%) | 121 (56) | 26 (62) | 0.481 |
Diabetes, n (%) | 31 (14) | 5 (12) | 0.675 |
Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 83 (38) | 15 (36) | 0.740 |
Atrial Fibrillation, n (%) | 59 (27) | 16 (38) | 0.159 |
Previous Antithrombotic treatment, n (%) | 84 (39) | 20 (48) | 0.291 |
Baseline SBP (mmHg), median (IQR) | 140 (125–158) | 139 (125–158) | 0.793 |
Glucose (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 119 (105–141) | 119 (107–143) | 0.779 |
NIHSS at admission, median (IQR) | 17 (10–20) | 19 (14–21) | 0.045 |
Ischemic core on CTP (mL), median (IQR) | 19 (7–34) | 18 (11–45) | 0.273 |
Hypoperfused tissue on CTP (mL), median (IQR) | 135 (98–186) | 144 (99–198) | 0.633 |
VLCBV (mL), median (IQR) | 0.03 (0–0.31) | 0.34 (0.03–2.07) | 0.002 |
VLCBV regions, n (%) | 26 (12) | 13 (31) | 0.002 |
Good collaterals, n (%) | 158 (73) | 27 (64) | 0.243 |
Alteplase + MT, n (%) | 116 (54) | 25 (60) | 0.488 |
Time to CTP (min), md (IQR) | 148 (77–252) | 242 (141–339) | 0.001 |
Time to MT onset (min), md (IQR) | 231 (161–334) | 327 (230–425) | 0.001 |
Recanalization (yes), n (%) | 170 (79) | 34 (81) | 0.743 |
Time to recanalization (min), median (IQR) | 270 (202–375) | 359 (303–479) | 0.001 |
Recanalization groups | 0.002 | ||
Recanalization < 4.5 h, n (%) | 86 (40) | 6 (14) | |
Recanalization > 4.5 h, n (%) | 84 (39) | 28 (67) | |
No rec, n (%) | 46 (21) | 8 (19) | |
Time to MRI (hours), md (IQR) | 40 (26–65) | 43 (24–69) | 0.589 |
Cardioembolic origin, n (%) | 103 (48) | 27 (64) | 0.049 |
Location of the occlusion | 0.436 | ||
Tandem occlusions, n (%) | 33 (15) | 7 (17) | |
ICA-T or M1, n (%) | 169 (78) | 30 (71) | |
M2, n (%) | 14 (7) | 5 (12) | |
Follow-up clinical variables | |||
Symptomatic ICH, n (%) | 1 (1) | 7 (17) | < 0.001 |
mRS at 90 days, median (IQR) | 2 (1–3) | 3 (2–4) | 0.019 |
ASPECTS Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP computed tomographic perfusion, ET endovascular therapy, ICA-T internal carotid artery, ICH intracranial hemorrhage, mRS modified Rankin Scale, MT mechanical thrombectomy, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, PH parenchymal hematoma, SBP systolic blood pressure, VLCBV very low cerebral blood volume.
Predictors of PH in the whole population: multivariate analysis
In multivariate analyses, both the volume of ischemic tissue with VLCBV values and the presence of VLCBV regions were associated with an increased risk of PH (Table 2). Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the presence of VLCBV regions for predicting the occurrence of PH were 31%, 88%, 33% and 87%, respectively. Additional variables that remained associated with PH were successful recanalization beyond 4.5 h from stroke onset and cardioembolic stroke etiology.
Table 2.
PH at follow-up MRI | OR (95% CI); p | OR (95% CI); p |
---|---|---|
Model A | Model B | |
VLCBV regions | 2.816 (1.146–6.918), p = 0.024 | 1.592 (1.133–2.237), p = 0.007 |
Pretreatment glucose (per IQR) | 1.049 (0.755–1.456), p = 0.777 | 1.072 (0.771–1.491), p = 0.678 |
Baseline NIHSS (per IQR) | 1.337 (0.948–1.887), p = 0.098 | 1.260 (0.885–1.795), p = 0.200 |
Rescue MT (vs primary) | 1.395 (0.668–2.916), p = 0.376 | 1.415 (0.674–2.971), p = 0.359 |
Recanalization status | ||
> 4′5 h from stroke onset (vs < 4′5 h) | 6.656 (2.444–18.130), p < 0.001 | 7.552 (2.745–20.779), p < 0.001 |
No recanalization (vs < 4′5 h) | 2.848 (0.867–9.351), p = 0.084 | 2.810 (0.865–9.132), p = 0.086 |
Cardioembolic etiology (vs no) | 2.584 (1.197–5.577), p = 0.016 | 2.812 (1.285–6.153), p = 0.010 |
Sex (females vs males) | 0.500 (0.228–1.097), p = 0.084 | 0.522 (0.237–1.150), p = 0.107 |
Good collaterals (vs poor) | 1.256 (0.550–2.867), p = 0.588 | 1.369 (0.599–3.129), p = 0.456 |
Very low cerebral blood volume (VLCBV) was included as a dichotomic variable (yes vs no) in model A, and as a continuous quantitative variable (estimations per IQR of VLCBV increase) in model B. MT: Mechanical thrombectomy; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PH: parenchymal hematoma. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test showed an adequate goodness-of-fit of the final models (Model A: X2 = 4.028, p = 0.855; Model B: X2 = 9.329, p = 0.315), and the models classified correctly a total of 84% (Model A) and 85% (Model B) of cases.
Glucose, VLCBV and risk of PH
In the whole population, glucose levels were not associated with the presence of PH. However, pretreatment glucose levels interacted significantly with VLCBV for the prediction of PH (p = 0.011). In patients with VLCBV-regions (see Supplementary Table 2 for subgroup descriptive variables), glucose levels were associated with an increased risk of PH (OR = 2.18 per IQR increase in glucose levels; 95% CI = 1.13–4.200, p = 0.020), whereas this association was not significant in patients without VLCBV-regions. The direction of these observations remained unchanged in multivariate models adjusted for the effect of confounders (Fig. 1). Neither glucose nor VLCBV interacted significantly with mTICI score at the end of MT (p = 0.622 and p = 0.389, respectively) or with time from stroke onset to successful recanalization on the prediction of PH (p = 0.202 and p = 0.777, respectively).
Figure 2 shows the adjusted predicted probabilities of the occurrence of a PH according to pretreatment glucose levels and VLCBV volume. In adjusted models, per IQR increase in glucose levels, the predicted probability of PH increased in 75% in patients with VLCBV regions (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.04–9.10, p = 0.043). According to ROC analysis, in the subset of patients with VLCBV regions the cutoff of pretreatment glucose levels with best accuracy for predicting the occurrence of PH was 116 mg/dL (6.4 mmol/L; sensitivity 69%, specificity 65%, positive predictive value 50% and negative predictive value 81%). According to this categorization, a total of 18 patients from 39 of those with VLCBV regions had elevated glucose levels. The observed rate of PH increased steadily from 13% (29 of 219) in patients without VLCBV regions, 19% (4 of 21) in those with VLCBV regions and low glucose levels (≤ 116 mg/dL, ≤ 6.4 mmol/L) and 50% (9 of 18) in patients with VLCBV regions and high glucose levels (> 116 mg/dL, > 6.4 mmol/L) (p for trend < 0.001).
Hemodynamic correlates of PH according to pretreatment glucose levels: CTP-MRI coregistered regions of interest analysis
As shown in Fig. 3A, brain regions that developed PH or infarct at follow-up had lower CBV values in pretreatment CTP compared with mirror regions of the unaffected hemisphere. In addition, CBV values measured at baseline in coregistered brain regions that developed PH or infarct at follow-up were not correlated with pretreatment glucose levels and were similar in patients with levels higher or lower than 116 mg/dL (6.4 mmol/L), as illustrated in Fig. 3B, C. Finally, the quality of reperfusion measured with the mTICI score at the end of MT was not associated with pretreatment glucose levels (p = 0.952).
Glucose, VLCBV and clinical outcome
The association of pretreatment glucose levels, VLCBV regions and their interactions with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, mRS at day 90 and mortality are shown in Table 3. Of note, the interaction between pretreatment glucose levels and the presence of VLCBV regions on the prediction of these clinical outcomes was not significant.
Table 3.
Pretreatment glucose (per IQR increase) |
VLCBV regions (yes vs no) |
Pi | |
---|---|---|---|
mRS shift at 90 days | 1.310 (1.091–1.587), p = 0.006 | 1.587 (0.887–2.838), p = 0.120 | 0.562 |
Symptomatic ICH | 0.804 (0.424–1.525), p = 0.504 | 0.797 (0.095–6.663), p = 0.834 | 0.998 |
Mortality at 90 days | 0.990 (0.612–1.603), p = 0.968 | 0.932 (0.200–4.338), p = 0.929 | 0.751 |
Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p values per IQR increase in pretreatment glucose levels (second column) and according to the presence of very low cerebral blood volume (VLCBV) regions (third column) obtained through unadjusted logistic regression analysis. Pi values (fourth column) are the p values for the interaction between pretreatment glucose levels and the presence of VLCBV regions on each of the evaluated clinical outcomes. ICH intracranial hemorrhage, mRS modified Rankin Scale.
Discussion
In this study, we implemented a comprehensive CTP study to evaluate whether elevated glucose levels modified the association between severe hypoperfusion and PH after MT. In this cohort, elevated pretreatment glucose levels were associated with an increased risk of PH after MT in subjects with severe pretreatment hypoperfusion. Moreover, glucose levels were not associated with reduced CBV at pretreatment CTP in coregistered brain regions that developed PH or infarct at follow-up. Overall, these results suggest the existence of synergistic deleterious effects of severe pretreatment hypoperfusion and elevated glucose and give support to their consideration in the evaluation of adjunctive neuroprotective strategies.
In agreement with previous studies, the presence of regions with severe hypoperfusion was significantly associated with an increased risk of PH at follow-up neuroimaging9–11,26–29. Beyond the severity of brain ischemia, a number of additional variables have been also associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation after MT, including an increased NIHSS score, poor collaterals, antiplatelet use, atrial fibrillation, older age or pretreatment hyperglycemia, among others6. As a novel finding of this study, we found that pretreatment glucose levels interacted significantly with severe hypoperfusion on the prediction of PH. Thus, in patients with regions of VLCBV, higher pretreatment glucose levels increased significantly the risk of PH, while this association was not significant in patients without VLCBV regions. Indeed, about 1 in 5 patients with VLCBV regions and low pretreatment glucose levels at baseline developed a PH in follow-up neuroimaging, whereas this rate increased to 1 in 2 patients with concurrent high glucose levels. The consideration of pretreatment glucose in addition to the presence of VLCBV regions resulted in higher positive predictive value for the prediction of PH in comparison with VLCBV alone. From a practical point of view, the combination of these biomarkers could be useful in the evaluation of strategies aimed to protect the blood–brain barrier in this patient population as patients with regions of severe ischemia and elevated pretreatment glucose levels may represent a target population for the early implementation of preventive strategies. These strategies could theoretically include a tighter control of blood pressure, the avoidance of early post-treatment aggressive antithrombotic therapy or the addition of adjunctive neuroprotective or vasculoprotective therapies. Of these potential treatments, the implementation of strategies focused in lowering glucose concentrations and achieving a tight glucose control in the early acute phase have been repeatedly unsuccessful in humans regardless of preventing lactic acidosis30–32. Contrarily, preliminary data from preclinical and clinical studies support that the enhancement of antioxidant exposure in combination with reperfusion therapies could minimize the toxicity of hyperglycemia33. Importantly, given the strong clinical benefits of MT, the presence of regions of severe reductions of CBV in CTP and concurrent hyperglycemia should not preclude the treatment of patients otherwise eligible for receiving endovascular reperfusion therapies.
In experimental models of brain ischemia, hyperglycemia exacerbates ischemic brain injury by increasing infarct size, brain swelling and blood–brain barrier disruption34–37. Several preclinical studies have shown a direct association between induced hyperglycemia and poorer perfusion metrics during ischemia and after reperfusion whereas others were not able to identify such relationship16–23. In this study, pretreatment CBV values were not correlated with pretreatment glucose levels and were similar in patients with levels higher or lower than 116 mg/dL (6.4 mmol/L), regardless of the presence of successful recanalization. In addition, the quality of reperfusion obtained at the end of MT was not associated with pretreatment glucose levels, in agreement with findings from a recent meta-analysis that included pooled-data of the pivotal thrombectomy trials13. Overall, our results support the relevance of additional pathophysiological mechanisms beyond hyperacute glucose-driven disturbances in cerebral perfusion to explain the association between hyperglycemia and severe hypoperfusion with the risk of PH, such as enhanced thromboinflammatory mechanisms, increased blood–brain barrier disruption and worse cytotoxic injury, among others15,36,37.
The main strength of the study was the use of whole-brain CTP that allowed obtaining perfusion measures of most of the affected brain tissue. Moreover, patients were collected consecutively and managed following a homogeneous therapeutic protocol. The management of hyperglycemia in the acute phase followed the recommendations of contemporary guidelines recommending the administration of insulin in patients with glucose concentrations > 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L). Furthermore, although the sensitivity of MRI to detect hemorrhagic transformation is higher than CT, we do not think this is likely to have significantly affected our result because the imaging modality used for the attribution of the main outcome variable (PH) was identical (gradient-recall echo MRI sequence) in all the study population thus avoiding biases related to the use of different modalities (CT or MRI). Nonetheless, the study has several limitations. First, the assessment of perfusion with dynamic CT in acute stroke is a static evaluation of a multifaceted and time-dependent process. Secondly, perfusion measures may be affected by multiple factors, including acquisition protocols, brain coverage and post-processing platforms, and therefore our results may apply to the protocol of acquisition and analysis that were employed in these series and may not be generalizable to other methodologies. In this study, we used the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria for qualifying the type of hemorrhagic transformations to allow direct comparisons with previously reported studies on the same matter. Further validation of these results using the new Heidelberg Bleeding Classification specially for assessing the effect of hyperglycemia and severe hypoperfusion on the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation is warranted38. An additional limitation includes the lack of information on the longitudinal course of glucose at follow up and the undocumented use of blood glucose lowering drugs. Finally, the results were not controlled by type of stroke onset (witnessed versus unwitnessed) or pre-stroke fasting status, as those variables were not registered. Of note, given the retrospective nature of the study no causality assumptions can be inferred from the obtained data.
Conclusions
In summary, this study shows that elevated pretreatment glucose levels were associated with an increased risk of parenchymal hematoma after endovascular reperfusion therapy of acute ischemic stroke in patients with severe pretreatment hypoperfusion. Moreover, the link between pretreatment glucose levels and severe hypoperfusion was not explained by an association of glucose with reduced CBV during ischemia and prior to reperfusion, thus suggesting alternative deleterious mechanisms other than direct glucose-driven hemodynamic impairment. These two factors should be considered in the evaluation of adjunctive neuroprotective strategies aimed to protect the blood–brain barrier in addition to early and complete recanalization.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was partially developed at the building Centro Esther Koplowitz, Barcelona, CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya. We thank the support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for grant to Dr. Sergio Amaro (PI13/01268 and PI16/00711, funded as part of the Plan Nacional R+D+I and cofinanced by ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and by the FEDER) and to Angel Chamorro (RETICS-INVICTUS R012/0014, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competence). Carlos Laredo receives funding from ISCIII, with a Predoctoral Grant for Health Research (PFIS, FI16/00231).
Author contributions
C.L. obtained the imaging data, implemented the post-processing of the images and performed the statistical analysis. AR, XU, LLl and SR obtained the clinical data. A.R., R.T., A.L.R. and N.G.M. supervised the neuroimage post-processing and analysis. C.L., A.R., R.T., X.U., L.L.l., S.R., V.O., S.A. and A.C. revised the article critically for intellectual content. SA and AC designed the study, interpreted the data and wrote the final draft of the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Sergio Amaro, Email: samaro@clinic.cat.
Ángel Chamorro, Email: achamorro@clinic.cat.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-67448-x.
References
- 1.Saver JL, et al. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goyal M, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Renú A, et al. Relevance of blood–brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:673–679. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khatri P, Wechsler LR, Broderick JP. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with revascularization therapies. Stroke. 2007;38:431–440. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254524.23708.c9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee YB, et al. Predictors and impact of hemorrhagic transformations after endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute large vessel occlusions. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2019;11:469–473. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hao Y, et al. Predictors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2017;48:1203–1209. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raychev R, et al. The impact of general anesthesia, baseline ASPECTS, time to treatment, and IV tPA on intracranial hemorrhage after neurothrombectomy: Pooled analysis of the SWIFT PRIME, SWIFT, and STAR trials. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2020;12:2–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van Kranendonk KR, et al. Clinical and imaging markers associated with hemorrhagic transformation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:2037–2043. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rai AT, Raghuram K, Carpenter JS, Domico J, Hobbs G. Pre-intervention cerebral blood volume predicts outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2013;5:i25–i32. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhatt A, et al. Lower pretreatment cerebral blood volume affects hemorrhagic risks after intra-arterial revascularization in acute stroke. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:874–879. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000333259.11739.AD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Renú A, et al. Brain hemorrhage after endovascular reperfusion therapy of ischemic stroke: a threshold-finding whole-brain perfusion CT study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:153–165. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15621704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Natarajan SK, et al. Prediction of adverse outcomes by blood glucose level after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J. Neurosurg. 2011;114:1785–1799. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.JNS10884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chamorro Á, et al. Glucose modifies the effect of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:690–696. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hafez S, Coucha M, Bruno A, Fagan SC, Ergul A. Hyperglycemia, acute ischemic stroke, and thrombolytic therapy. Transl. Stroke Res. 2014;5:442–453. doi: 10.1007/s12975-014-0336-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Desilles J-P, et al. Exacerbation of thromboinflammation by hyperglycemia precipitates cerebral infarct growth and hemorrhagic transformation. Stroke. 2017;48:1932–1940. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kawai N, Keep RF, Betz AL. Hyperglycemia and the vascular effects of cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1997;28:149–154. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.28.1.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nakai H, Yamamoto YL, Diksic M, Worsley KJ, Takara E. Triple-tracer autoradiography demonstrates effects of hyperglycemia on cerebral blood flow, pH, and glucose utilization in cerebral ischemia of rats. Stroke. 1988;19:764–772. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.19.6.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Quast MJ, et al. Perfusion deficit parallels exacerbation of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in hyperglycemic rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:553–559. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199705000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duckrow RB, Beard DC, Brennan RW. Regional cerebral blood flow decreases during chronic and acute hyperglycemia. Stroke. 1987;18:52–58. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.18.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ginsberg MD, Welsh FA, Budd WW. Deleterious effect of glucose pretreatment on recovery from diffuse cerebral ischemia in the cat. I. Local cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization. Stroke. 1980;11:347–354. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.11.4.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Venables GS, Miller SA, Gibson G, Hardy JA, Strong AJ. The effects of hyperglycaemia on changes during reperfusion following focal cerebral ischaemia in the cat. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1985;48:663–669. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.7.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wagner KR, Kleinholz M, de Courten-Myers GM, Myers RE. Hyperglycemic versus normoglycemic stroke: Topography of brain metabolites, intracellular pH, and infarct size. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:213–222. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1992.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gisselsson L, Smith M-L, Siesjö BK. Hyperglycemia and focal brain ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:288–297. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199903000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tan IYL, et al. CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009;30:525–531. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hacke W, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Campbell BCV, et al. Regional very low cerebral blood volume predicts hemorrhagic transformation better than diffusion-weighted imaging volume and thresholded apparent diffusion coefficient in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:82–88. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.562116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Campbell BCV, et al. Advanced imaging improves prediction of hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:510–519. doi: 10.1002/ana.23837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hermitte L, et al. Very low cerebral blood volume predicts parenchymal hematoma in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:2318–2320. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yassi N, et al. Prediction of poststroke hemorrhagic transformation using computed tomography perfusion. Stroke. 2013;44:3039–3043. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gray CS, et al. Glucose-potassium-insulin infusions in the management of post-stroke hyperglycaemia: the UK Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial (GIST-UK) Lancet. Neurol. 2007;6:397–406. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70080-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McCormick M, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of insulin for acute poststroke hyperglycemia. Ann. Neurol. 2010;67:570–578. doi: 10.1002/ana.21983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johnston KC, et al. Intensive vs standard treatment of hyperglycemia and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke: The SHINE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322:326–335. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Amaro S, et al. Uric acid improves glucose-driven oxidative stress in human ischemic stroke. Ann. Neurol. 2015;77:775–783. doi: 10.1002/ana.24378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Martini SR, Kent TA. Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: A vascular perspective. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:435–451. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suh SW, et al. Glucose and NADPH oxidase drive neuronal superoxide formation in stroke. Ann. Neurol. 2008;64:654–663. doi: 10.1002/ana.21511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kamada H, Yu F, Nito C, Chan PH. Influence of hyperglycemia on oxidative stress and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation after focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in rats: Relation to blood–brain barrier dysfunction. Stroke. 2007;38:1044–1049. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258041.75739.cb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bevers MB, Vaishnav NH, Pham L, Battey TW, Kimberly WT. Hyperglycemia is associated with more severe cytotoxic injury after stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:2577–2583. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16671730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Neuberger U, et al. Classification of bleeding events. Stroke. 2017;48:1983–1985. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.