Abstract
A successful global healthcare response relies on versatile vaccines and production of broadly virus-neutralizing antibodies by the immune system to protect us from emerging infectious diseases. The present 2019 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic highlights the urgent need for development of anti-viral biodefense. Due to the genetic and proteomic diversities of viral pathogens, establishing versatile anti-viral vaccines or therapeutic agents is highly challenging. Carbohydrate antigens represent an important class of immunological targets for vaccine development and immunotherapy against microbial infections. In this mini review, some concepts and strategies for exploring the potential of immunogenic sugar moieties as CoV vaccine candidates are presented.
Keywords: coronavirus, COVID-19, glyco-conjugate, lectin, N-glycans, oligomannoses, SARS, SARS-CoV-2, spike glycoprotein, vaccines, virus-neutralizing antibody
INTRODUCTION
As the current worldwide COVID-19 pandemic rages, it is clear that an efficacious global healthcare response must include multipurpose vaccines that stimulate production of broadly virus-neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against emerging viral pathogens. Due to the genomic and proteomic diversities of viral pathogens, establishing such countermeasures against viral infections is difficult. The recent outbreaks of diseases caused by coronaviruses (CoVs), including the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [1, 2], the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [3, 4], and the 2019-nCoV in the present outbreak [5–9], pose new challenges to global efforts to combat infectious diseases.
Protein targets
The 2019-nCoV has been phylogenetically mapped to the same Betacoronavirus clade as SARS-CoV [10, 11] and, accordingly, classified as SARS-CoV-2 [12]. However, the two viruses differ significantly in their amino acid sequences. As compared to the consensus sequences of SARS-CoV and SARS-like viruses, SARS-CoV-2 contains 380 amino acid substitutions in total and 27 substitutions in the spike glycoprotein (S) critical for viral entry and antibody-mediated virus-neutralization [10, 11]. Although the overall structure of SARS-CoV-2 resembles that of SARS-CoV, and shares the same functional host cell receptor—angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the SARS-CoV-2-S differs significantly from that of SARS-CoV-S, most notably in five of the six amino acid residues critical for binding to ACE2 [9]. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for the RBD of SARS-CoV-S have no cross-reactivity to the SARS-CoV-2-S RBD [13]. Characteristic structural elements in SARS-CoV-2-S include a furin cleavage site at the boundary between the S1/S2 subunits and three adjacent potential O-glycosylation sites not previously seen in lineage-B betacoronaviruses. Nevertheless, murine polyclonal anti-sera to SARS-CoV-S potently inhibited SARS-CoV-2-S-mediated entry into target cells [14], indicating the presence of shared antigenic structures—perhaps in the more conserved S2 region of the two CoVs. Much remains to be learned about the antigenic characteristics of the new CoV as compared to SARS-CoV and other human CoVs [15, 16].
Immunogenic carbohydrate moieties
Carbohydrates represent an important class of microbial antigens. These molecules are structurally diverse and prominently displayed on the surfaces of virtually every microbial pathogen [17, 18]. In 1917, Dochez and Avery [19] found that when Pneumococci were grown in fluid media, there was a substance in the culture fluid that precipitated specifically with antisera to the same Pneumococcus. Heidelberger and Avery [20] showed the substance recognized by the antibodies was a carbohydrate molecule and not a protein, as previously thought. It was later shown that almost every microorganism expresses such sugar signatures recognized by the host immune systems and that they are effective in stimulating specific antibody responses [17, 18]. Such immunogenic carbohydrate moieties often serve as key targets for development of vaccines against infectious diseases [21–25]. A large panel of pathogen-specific carbohydrate moieties has been identified; some have been successfully explored for use in vaccines or targeted immunotherapy against microbial infections [21–25]. A notable example is that introduction of carbohydrate-conjugate vaccines has virtually eradicated childhood meningitis and systemic lethal bacterial infection caused by Haemophilus influenzae B [23, 24, 26–28]
Like bacterial pathogens, viruses also decorate their outer surfaces with carbohydrate moieties. Unlike bacteria, which have evolved their own machineries for glycosylation and often produce unique sugar chain signatures, viruses depend on host cells for glycosylation and generally decorate their virions with the “self”-glycans of corresponding hosts. This “sugar shield” is thought to be one of the strategies viruses evolved to escape host immune rejection. For example, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) [29], Lassa virus [30], hepatitis C virus [31], and Epstein–Barr virus [32] exhibit extensive N-linked glycans covering the exposed protein surfaces, including critical virus-neutralizing protein epitopes. Similarly, CoV S glycans mask the protein surface and consequently limit antibody access to protein-neutralizing epitopes [33].
Viral glycan shields as vaccine targets
New ideas and innovative strategies are urgently needed to establish multipurpose vaccines against the emergence or re-emergence of unexpected viral pathogens. Recently, carbohydrate researchers undertook an investigation to explore whether viruses of distinct phylogenetic origins, such as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), HIV-1, and SARS-CoV, express conserved glyco-determinants that are suitable for broad-spectrum virus neutralization [34]. The assumption was that viruses depend on host glycosylation machinery for glycan synthesis and thereby may express the conserved viral carbohydrates. These studies led to the recognition of several glyco-antigens co-expressed by these viruses, including not only the known oligomannosyl antigens but also the previously less studied Tri/m-II, and Tri/m-Gn glyco-epitopes (Figure 1) [34]. Such glycan clusters belong to a class of N-glycan cryptic autoantigens with unique immunological properties. They are generally present intracellularly as glycosylation intermediates, but become overexpressed and/or surface-exposed by some viral pathogens [35–37] as well as tumor cells [38–40]. Thus, induction of immune responses to these targets is unlikely to be harmful to normal cells. Instead, antibodies or lectins targeting these cryptic intracellular antigens are likely essential for the clearance of autoantigens released from the aged or apoptotic cells in vivo [41, 42]. Interestingly, a broadly virus-neutralizing agent, Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA), recognizes specific targets in the panel and effectively neutralizes many viruses [34, 43–46], including SARS-CoV [34, 43].
Figure 1. Schematic of a panel of N-glycan cryptic glyco-antigens.

Asialo-orosomucoid (ASOR) and agalacto-OR (AGOR) were chemically prepared to expose cryptic glyco-epitopes, tri-antennary or multi-valent type II (Tri/m-II) and Tri/m-GlcNAc (Gn), respectively. Oligomannose moieties display a diverse panel of cryptic epitopes. As illustrated, these glyco-epitopes are recognized by specific virus-neutralizing agents: a) mannosyl-epitopes recognized by 2G12 or GNA; b) Tri/m-Gn epitopes stained by GNA or wheat germ agglutinin (WGA); and c) Tri/m-II epitopes that are highly reactive with PHA-L and SARS-CoV neutralization antibodies.
A common feature of CoVs is that their S glycoproteins are densely decorated by N-linked glycans protruding from the surfaces of the virions [33, 47–49]. The SARS-CoV-2-S comprises 22 N-linked glycosylation sites, and 16 of them were resolved in the cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) map as glycosylated. By comparison, SARS-CoV-S possesses 23 N-linked glycosylation sites with at least 19 of them confirmed to be glycosylated [47]. Twenty out of 22 SARS-CoV-2-S N-linked glycosylation sites are conserved in SARS-CoV-S. Specifically, 9 out of 13 sites in the S1 subunit and all 9 sites in the S2 subunit are conserved among SARS-CoV-2-S and SARS-CoV-S. CoVs may overexpress the high-mannose type since CoV virions are likely matured in and directly bud from the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi intermediate compartment without further editing by the Golgi-residential glyco-enzymes [33, 50]. Thus, it is important to determine whether or not SARS-CoV-2 and other CoVs also express these GNA-positive glyco-determinants and other glycan-based virus-neutralizing epitopes.
Challenges and opportunities in CoV vaccine development
The current COVID-19 pandemic has ignited global efforts toward development of an effective SAR-CoV-2 vaccine [51–53]. One of the key targeted immunogens is SARS-CoV-2-S glycoprotein since it is crucial for receptor binding, membrane fusion via conformational changes, internalization of the virus, and host tissue tropism [54]. A novel lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine, mRNA-1273 (ModernaTX, Inc., Cambridge, MA), was designed to express a full-length, prefusion stabilized SARS-CoV-2-S protein. Since the human cells of each vaccinated person express the protein in vivo, the immunogen produced by mRNA-1273 can be viewed as a form of natural glycoconjugate with the sugar moieties displayed by the precisely translated S-protein carrier. This type of vaccine may induce T-dependent antibody responses to the glycol-determinants. Ideally, this RNA-based vaccine may trigger both anti-protein and anti-glycan antibody responses in vivo to enhance anti-SAR-SCoV-2 immunity. Similarly, other vaccine platforms, such as virus-like particles, inactivated SAR-SCoV-2, and DNA vaccines that produce S glycoprotein may also express carbohydrate epitopes. Thus, analyzing the vaccine responses may provide very useful data to evaluate potential immunogenicity of vaccine components, including proteins and carbohydrates.
Carbohydrate microarrays have proven to be a powerful means for exploring the immunogenic sugar moieties recognized by host immune systems to mount antibody responses [22, 35, 55–58]. Unlike a conventional S glycoprotein immunoassay that detects the sum of anti-protein and anti-glycan antibodies, carbohydrate microarrays can be designed to present either pure carbohydrate moieties [22, 59] or glycoconjugates [46, 60] lacking S protein components and, thereby, can be used to decipher anti-glycan and anti-protein antibodies for a given immunogen or pathogen. Characterizing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response or COVID-19 patients’ serological response using carbohydrate microarrays is, therefore, a practical approach to verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is also decorated with glyco-determinants that are promising immunological targets.
Due to variation in glycosylation patterns among different cell types, CoV virions produced by different cells may also carry unique glycan signatures. For example, bat cells carry many non-human glycans, such as non-human sialic acids [61], the Galili alpha-Gal epitopes [62], and, perhaps, bisecting GlcNAc moieties [63]. Whether the bat cell-produced CoVs express these highly immunogenic sugar moieties and if human infection caused by the first wave of bat-CoVs triggered hyperimmune responses to these non-human glycans and contributed to severity of the diseases remains to be seen. Characterizing cohorts of COVID-19 patients from different epicenters—especially a comparative serological study of the early onset sample sets and the later human-human transmitted sample sets using carbohydrate microarrays and other glycan-specific immunoassays—may uncover important glyco-immunological information to guide development of glyco-conjugate vaccines and therapeutic antibodies to target the sugar shield of SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps other unexpected CoVs with human outbreak potential. The glyco-conjugate vaccines without any CoV protein component may have the unique advantage of avoiding undesired vaccine responses to the S-protein epitopes that were non-neutralizing but elicited the antibody-dependent enhancement of infectivity and severe Th2-type lung immunopathy observed during SARS-CoV vaccine development [53, 64–69].
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author acknowledges Ray Wu, Jennifer Wright, Lai-Xi Wang, and Rose Mage for a critical review and helpful discussion of this communication. This work was supported in part by US Government grants 1R21AI124068 (NIH), 1R21DA046144 (NIH), and PR170128 (CDMRP) to DW. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agents.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare
REFERENCES
- 1.Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WK, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VC, Chan KH, Tsang DN, Yung RW, Ng TK and Yuen KY 2003, Lancet, 361, 1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong S, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling AE, Humphrey CD, Shieh WJ, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, Yang JY, Cox N, Hughes JM, LeDuc JW, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ and Group SW 2003, N. Engl. J. Med, 348, 1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD and Fouchier RA 2012, N. Engl. J. Med, 367, 1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cui J, Li F and Shi ZL 2019, Nat. Rev. Microbiol, 17, 181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF and Tan W 2020, N. Engl. J. Med, 382, 727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J and Cao B 2020, Lancet, 395, 497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, Qiu Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Wei Y, Xia J, Yu T, Zhang X and Zhang L 2020, Lancet, 395, 507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC and Zhang YZ 2020, Nature, 579, 265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC and Garry RF 2020, Nature Medicine, 26, 450–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, Ding X, Wang X, Niu P, Meng J, Zhu Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Sheng J, Quan L, Xia Z,Tan W, Cheng G and Jiang T 2020, Cell Host Microbe, 27, 325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kumar S, Maurya VK, Prasad AK, Bhatt MLB and Saxena SK 2020, Virus Disease, 31, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2020, Nat. Microbiol, 5, 536.32123347 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS and McLellan JS 2020, Science, 367, 1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT and Veesler D 2020, Cell, 181, 281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zheng M and Song L 2020, Cell. Mol. Immunol, 17, 536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wen F, Yu H, Guo J, Li Y, Luo K and Huang S 2020, J. Infect, pii:S0163–4453(20)30108–0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mond JJ, Lees A and Snapper CM 1995, Ann. Rev. Immunol, 13, 655, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang D and Kabat EA 1996, Structure of Antigens, Regenmortal MHVV (Ed.), Boca Raton. New York. London. Tokyo, CRC Press, pp. 247. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dochez AR and Avery OT 1917, J. Exp. Med, 26, 477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Heidelberger M and Avery OT 1923, J. Exp. Med, 38, 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ezzell JW Jr., Abshire TG, Little SF, Lidgerding BC and Brown C 1990, J. Clin. Microbiol, 28, 223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang D, Carroll GT, Turro NJ, Koberstein JT, Kovac P, Saksena R, Adamo R, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA and Steinman L 2007, Proteomics, 7, 180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schneerson R, Robbins JB, Barrera O, Sutton A, Habig WB, Hardegree MC and Chaimovich J 1980, Prog. Clin. Biol. Res, 47, 77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robbins JB and Schneerson R 1990, J. Infect. Dis, 161, 821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lucas AH, Rittenhouse-Olson K, Kronenberg M, Apicella MA, Wang D, Schreiber JR and Taylor CE 2008, Vaccine, 28, 1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Madore DV, Johnson CL, Phipps DC, Myers MG, Eby R and Smith DH 1990,Pediatrics, 86, 527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Madore DV, Johnson CL, Phipps DC, Popejoy LA, Eby R and Smith DH 1990, Pediatrics, 85, 331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahonkhai VI, Lukacs LJ, Jonas LC, Matthews H, Vella PP, Ellis RW, Staub JM, Dolan KT, Rusk CM, Calandra GB and Gerety RJ 1990, Pediatrics, 85, 676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stewart-Jones GB, Soto C, Lemmin T, Chuang GY, Druz A, Kong R, Thomas PV, Wagh K, Zhou T, Behrens AJ, Bylund T, Choi CW, Davison JR, Georgiev IS, Joyce MG, Kwon YD, Pancera M, Taft J, Yang Y, Zhang B, Shivatare SS, Shivatare VS, Lee CC, Wu CY, Bewley CA, Burton DR, Koff WC, Connors M, Crispin M, Baxa U, Korber BT, Wong CH, Mascola JR and Kwong PD 2016, Cell, 165, 813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sommerstein R, Flatz L, Remy MM, Malinge P, Magistrelli G, Fischer N, Sahin M, Bergthaler A, Igonet S, Ter Meulen J, Rigo D, Meda P, Rabah N, Coutard B, Bowden TA, Lambert PH, Siegrist CA and Pinschewer DD 2015, PLoS Pathog, 11, e1005276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Falkowska E, Kajumo F, Garcia E, Reinus J and Dragic T 2007, J. Virol, 81, 8072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Szakonyi G, Klein MG, Hannan JP, Young KA, Ma RZ, Asokan R, Holers VM and Chen XS 2006, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 13, 996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Frenz B, Snijder J, Li W, Rey FA, DiMaio F, Bosch BJ and Veesler D 2016, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 23, 899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang D, Tang J, Tang J and Wang LX 2015, Molecules, 20, 4610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang D and Lu J 2004, Physiol Genomics, 18, 245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calarese DA, Scanlan CN, Zwick MB, Deechongkit S, Mimura Y, Kunert R, Zhu P, Wormald MR, Stanfield RL, Roux KH, Kelly JW, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Katinger H, Burton DR and Wilson IA 2003, Science, 300, 2065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Doores KJ, Bonomelli C, Harvey DJ, Vasiljevic S, Dwek RA, Burton DR, Crispin M and Scanlan CN 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 13800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang D 2012, J. Prot. Bioinf, 5, 090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang D, Dafik L, Nolley R, Huang W, Wolfinger RD, Wang LX and Peehl DM 2013, Drug Dev. Res, 74, 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Newsom-Davis TE, Wang D, Steinman L, Chen PF, Wang LX, Simon AK and Screaton GR 2009, Cancer Res, 69, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nauta AJ, Raaschou-Jensen N, Roos A, Daha MR, Madsen HO, Borrias-Essers MC, Ryder LP, Koch C and Garred P 2003, Eur. J. Immunol, 33, 2853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ip WK, Takahashi K, Ezekowitz RA and Stuart LM 2009, Immunol. Rev, 230, 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Balzarini J, Hatse S, Vermeire K, Princen K, Aquaro S, Perno CF, De Clercq E, Egberink H, Vanden Mooter G, Peumans W, Van Damme E and Schols D 2004, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 48, 3858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Balzarini J, Lee CK, Schols D and De Clercq E 1991, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 178, 563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Keyaerts E, Vijgen L, Pannecouque C, Van Damme E, Peumans W, Egberink H, Balzarini J and Van Ranst M 2007, Antiviral. Res, 75, 179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Toonstra C, Wu L, Li C, Wang D and Wang LX 2018, Bioconjug. Chem, 29, 1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Walls AC, Xiong X, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Snijder J, Quispe J, Cameroni E, Gopal R, Dai M, Lanzavecchia A, Zambon M, Rey FA, Corti D and Veesler D 2019, Cell, 176, 1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y and Zhou Q 2020, Science, 367, 1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xiong X, Tortorici MA, Snijder J, Yoshioka C, Walls AC, Li W, McGuire AT, Rey FA, Bosch BJ and Veesler D 2018, J. Virol, 92, pii:e01628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jeffers SA, Hemmila EM and Holmes KV 2006, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol, 581, 265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lu S 2020, Emerg. Microbes Infect, 9, 542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Amanat F and Krammer F 2020, Immunity, 52, 583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen WH, Strych U, Hotez PJ and Bottazzi ME 2020, Curr. Trop. Med. Rep, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Song W, Gui M, Wang X and Xiang Y 2018, PLoS Pathog, 14, e1007236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang D, Liu S, Trummer BJ, Deng C and Wang A 2002, Nat. Biotechnol, 20, 275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang D 2012, Methods Mol. Biol, 808, 241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang D 2014, J. Prot. Bioinf, 7, e24. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang D 2003, Proteomics, 3, 2167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Song X, Ju H, Lasanajak Y, Kudelka MR, Smith DF and Cummings RD 2016, Nat. Methods, 13, 528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fukui S, Feizi T, Galustian C, Lawson AM and Chai W 2002, Nat. Biotechnol, 20, 1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Varki A 1992, Glycobiology, 2, 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Galili U 1999, Subcell Biochem, 32, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Miwa HE, Song Y, Alvarez R, Cummings RD and Stanley P 2012, Glycoconj. J, 29, 609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tseng CT, Sbrana E, Iwata-Yoshikawa N, Newman PC, Garron T, Atmar RL, Peters CJ and Couch RB 2012, PLoS One, 7, e35421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, Chen KH, Liu FT, Liu WT, Chen YM and Huang JC 2014, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 451, 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yip MS, Leung NH, Cheung CY, Li PH, Lee HH, Daeron M, Peiris JS, Bruzzone R and Jaume M 2014, Virol. J, 11, 82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Luo F, Liao FL, Wang H, Tang HB, Yang ZQ and Hou W 2018, Virol. Sin, 33, 201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hotez PJ, Corry DB and Bottazzi ME 2020, Nat. Rev. Immunol, pii: 10.1038/s41577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Negro F 2020, Swiss Med. Wkly, 150, w20249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
