Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jun 30;81(5):816–846. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.073

Clinical recurrences of COVID-19 symptoms after recovery: Viral relapse, reinfection or inflammatory rebound?

Marie Gousseff k,1,, Pauline Penot r,1, Laure Gallay i,1, Dominique Batisse a,1, Nicolas Benech b,1, Kevin Bouiller e,f,1, Rocco Collarino g,1, Anne Conrad h,1, Dorsaf Slama t,1, Cédric Joseph l,1, Adrien Lemaignen m,1, François-Xavier Lescure n,o,1, Bruno Levy p,1, Matthieu Mahevas q,1, Bruno Pozzetto s,1, Nicolas Vignier u,1, Benjamin Wyplosz v,1, Dominique Salmon t,1, Francois Goehringer j,1,, Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers c,d,1; in behalf of the COCOREC study group
PMCID: PMC7326402  PMID: 32619697

Abstract

For the first 3 months of COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 was expected to be an immunizing non-relapsing disease. We report a national case series of 11 virologically-confirmed COVID-19 patients having experienced a second clinically- and virologically-confirmed acute COVID-19 episode. According to the clinical history, we discuss either re-infection or reactivation hypothesis. Larger studies including further virological, immunological and epidemiologic data are needed to understand the mechanisms of these recurrences.


Dear Editor,

The rapidly spreading COVID-19 pandemic resulted in more than 8.5 million cases diagnosed and 450,000 deaths on June 20th, 2020. As described with other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 was first expected to induce a monophasic disease with at least transient immunity.1 , 2 Nevertheless, rare cases of suspected COVID-19 “recurrence” or “reactivation” have been reported, including the description by Ye & Colleagues in this journal of 5 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 reactivation after home discharge.3, 4, 5, 6

Similarly, the COCOREC (Collaborative study COvid RECurrences) study aimed at summarizing clinical and virological data of patients presenting a second confirmed COVID-19 episode, at least 21 days after the first onset, and after a symptom-free interval [oxygen-free and discharge from acute-care unit (ACU), or return to usual clinical state]. Cases were collected retrospectively at a multicenter observational level through the COCLICO (COllaborative CLInician COVID-19) French study group meeting. A COVID-19 episode was defined by (i) at least one recent major clinical sign of COVID-19 including fever or chills, febrile flu-like-syndrome, dyspnoea, anosmia, or dysgeusia; and (ii) a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. Patients were not included if a differential diagnosis (amongst which bacterial, fungal or other viral superinfection, thrombo-embolic complication, secondary organizing pneumonia or interstitial lung disease) could explain the symptom recurrence. After information, all patients agreed with the use of their anonymous medical data. The study has been approved by the Ethic Committee of French Speaking Society of Infectious Disease (CER-MIT), number 2020-0503 COVID.

Between April 6th and May 14th, 2020, 11 patients were identified (sex ratio M/F 1.2, median age 55, range [19–91] years). The median duration of symptoms was 18 [13–41] days for the first episode and 10 [7–29] days for the second one for the 7 patients who eventually recovered. Epidemiological and clinical data are summarized in Table 1 .

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of COVID 19 first and 2nd episodes, from onset of first episode (D1) to last follow-up (home-care patients: patients1–4; hospitalized patients: patients 5–11).

Patients characteristics First episode 2nd episode
Case Age Sex Past medical history Clinical characteristics Treatments 1st Clinical cure 2nd ep onset Clinical characteristics Treatments Duration of 2nd episode (days) Outcome
1 19 F None (HCW) FLS with no fever-cough-dyspnoea-AO-DG -headache-diarrhoea- otalgia- None D18 D26 FLS-cough-dyspnoea -chest pain None on-going home care
2 32 F None (HCW) Cough-AO-myalgia-headache None D29 D36 FLS None 10 cured
3 33 F First trimester pregnancy (HCW) Myalgia-headache-fatigue-nasal congestion-sore throat None D13 D27 Fatigue-nasal congestion-sore throat-chills None 8 cured
4 43 M None (HCW) FLS-AO- headache None D14 D24 Cough-AO-myalgia headache-diarrhoea-fatigue None 29 cured
5 85 M Bronchiectasis - CHD - pace maker - arrhythmia Fever-cough-dyspnoea-fatigue-confusion-falls O2, ATB D17 D44 Cough-dyspnoea-fatigue-chest pain-confusion-acute heart failure O2 6 cured
6 54 M HT Fever-cough-dyspnoea -severe ARDS-fatigue ICU, OTI, ATB, LPV/rtv, CTS D41 D45 Cough-dyspnoea-diarrhoea-ARDS-fatigue ICU, OTI, ECMO, ATB 34 death
7 91 F CHD - HT-CVD- atherosclerosis- arrhythmia- DM Fever-dyspnoea-fatigue-pleural & pericardial effusion O2, ATB, CTS D13 D25 Dyspnoea-fatigue none 9 cured
8 55 M CLD, cirrhosis Child C Fever-headache-fatigue ATB D21 D27 Dyspnoea-headache-diarrhoea -fatigue ICU-HFNIV-OTI ATB 20 cured
9 72 M Anti MAG neuropathy (rituximab, bendamustine) Fever- cough- dyspnoea-worsening neuropathy O2, ATB D21 D27 Fever- cough- dyspnoea -fatigue – worsening neuropathy ICU-HFNIV-OTI, ATB remdesivir 29 death
10 73 M DLBCL (chemotherapy d-22) Fever-fatigue-abdominal cutaneous rash ATB D13 D24 Fever-dyspnoea-fatigue O2, ATB, CTS * 17 cured
11 84 F CLD / O2T – mild CRD - CHD arrhythmia/ATC - valvulopathy - atherosclerosis - DM Fever-cough-dyspnoea-AO-fatigue O2, curative ATC, ATB + CTS D23 D49 Fever-cough-dyspnoea-fatigue O2, HFNIV, ATB,tocilizumab, CTS curative ATC 30 death

Abbreviations : ATB : antibiotics - AO : anosmia – ATC : anticoagulation - CHD : Chronic Heart Disease- CLD : Chronic Lung Disease- CRD : Chronic Renal Disease – CVD : CerebroVascular Disease – CTS : corticosteroids DM : Diabetes Mellitus – DG : dysgeusia - DLBCL : Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma – ECMO : extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation – FLS : Flu Like Syndrome (= fever + myalgia + fatigue +/- sore throat, nasal congestion) - HT : hypertension – HCW : Health Care Worker - HFNIV: High Flow Non Invasive Ventilation - ICU : Intensive Care Unit -LPV/rtv : lopinavir/ritonavir – NA : Non Available - OTI : Oro-Tracheal Intubation – O2 : oxygen therapy.

No improvement after 7 days of piperacillin-tazobactam ; apyrexia 4 days after pip-taz stop and before linezolid.

Four healthcare workers (patients 1–4, median age 32.5 [19–43] years) without significant comorbidity had a first mild COVID-19 episode with a complete recovery: three returned to work in COVID units, one had possible COVID re-exposure at home (patient 2). All of them experienced a clinical relapse requiring sick-leave but no hospitalization after a median symptom-free interval of 9 [7–14] days.

In contrast, 7 older comorbid patients (patients 5–11, median age 73 [54–91] years) required ACU hospitalization for both episodes, with a clinical recovery of 11 [4–27] days in the interval. During the first episode, one patient received lopinavir, and three corticosteroids. Six of them required oxygen therapy again during the second episode. Two patients died of ARDS recurrence and another of chronic right heart failure worsening.

All patients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in respiratory samples for both episodes (Table 2 ). They all showed CT scan signs of acute COVID-19 during the second episode, worsening for 4 in 7 when comparison available, including a case of pulmonary embolism without sign of superinfection and no differential diagnosis (supplementary Table). A SARS-CoV-2 serology was available after D21 for nine patients: five were positive, one slightly positive and three negative. A viral culture was performed on Vero E6 cells from naso-pharyngeal swabs of two patients during the second episode; one was positive with a typical cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 and confirmed by RT-PCR; after sequencing, the strain was shown to belong to the B2 European lineage (Rambaut et al., bioRxiv preprint, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.046086).

Table 2.

Laboratory findings of COVID 19 first and 2nd episodes, from onset of first episode (D1) to last follow-up.

(home-care patients: patients1–4; hospitalized patients: patients 5–11).

First episode (onset = D1) No symptom 2nd episode
Case Blood tests SARS CoV2 PCR Minimal CRP Maximal L PCR if available Blood tests SARS CoV2 PCR Serology
Days from onset CT if available * Days from 1st onset CT if available * Days from 1st onset Results
1 NA D2 E 18 - N22 - RdRP 19 NA NA D29 E 35 - IP2 37 - IP4 42 D58 POSITIVE total Ig
2 NA D18 E 23,9- N NA - RdRP 23,6 NA NA D36 D55 E 31,5- N NA - RdRP 30,3 NEGATIVE NA NA
3 NA D3 30,5 NA L 1800 D28 32,7 D27 POSITIVE IgG IgM
4 NA D3 POSITIVE, CT NA NA L 1300 Eo 90CRP 1 D38 21.5 D31, 45 slighly POSITIVE IgG, NEGATIVE IgM
5 L 290 Eo 0 CRP 33 D1 E8 - N11- RdRP 12 L 870 CRP 17 PCR D36 : + E35 L700 Eo 30 CRP 15 D46 E 33 - N 33 - RdRP 32 Viral culture NEGATIVE NA NA
6 L 690 CRP 365 D16 D 38, 44 IP2 29,4 - IP4 29.9 NEGATIVE L 2750 CRP 28 L 690 Eo 50 CRP 247 D45 IP2 38.3 - IP4 36.2 D31 POSITIVE IgG IgM
7 L 720 Eo 10 CRP 143 D3 ORF1 18.7 - N 18.1 L 1500 CRP 34 L 1000 Eo 160 CRP 188 D26 ORF1 29,7 D27 POSITIVE IgG IgM
8 L 629 Eo 0 CRP 74 D6 16 L 1400 CRP 33 L 800 Eo 10 CRP 73 D31 POSITIVE, CT NA D27 D47 Ambiguous POSITIVE IgG
9 L 630 Eo 260 CRP 39 D7 POSITIVE, CT NA L 750 Eo 90 CRP 8 L 360 Eo 0 CRP 85 D 23, 32, 36 POSITIVE, CT NA D41 NEGATIVE
10 L 60 Eo 0 CRP 112.8 D6 17 Cutaneous PCR neg L 80 CRP 18 L 60 Eo 30 CRP 160 D35 18 D25 NEGATIVE
11 L 770 CRP 88 D11 IP4 31 L 1180 CRP 4.2 L 480 CRP 346 D50 IP4 16,7 Viral culture POSITIVE D53 NEGATIVE

L : lymphocytes (per mm3 )– Eo = Eosinophils polymorphonuclar leukocytes (per mm3)- CRP : C Reactive Protein (mg/l) NA: Non Available.

SARS CoV2 Polymerase Chain Reaction: cycle threshold (CT), envelope gene (E), nucleocapsid gene (N), ARN polymerase gene (RdRP, IP2, IP4), specific Open Reading Frame (ORF)1.

Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 involves both cell-mediated and humoral responses, but its protective role from re-infection along with definitive viral clearance is uncertain.7 Our case series of 11 patients having experienced two separate symptomatic COVID-19 episodes, associated with viral detection and no evidence for a differential diagnosis, raises two pathophysiological hypotheses underlying these recurrences: viral reinfection or viral reactivation from sanctuaries. In the case of healthy healthcare workers with mild symptoms at both episodes, a re-infection due to the prolonged exposition can be supposed, given the fact that the immune response may faint in this young population with no invasive infection.8 The second group included vulnerable persons less likely to have met the virus again and having presented two repeated episodes of hypoxemic pneumonia, fatal in three cases. Recurrence might have occurred due to a suboptimal control of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowing a second episode of viral replication.

COVID-19 recurrences should be differentiated from secondary complications such as pulmonary embolism or super infection5 or persistence of traces of viral RNA that can be detected in respiratory samples up to 6 weeks after onset of symptoms in clinically-cured patients.9

Immunosuppressive factors such as drugs or pathological conditions could contribute to impair viral clearance and favour SARS-CoV-2 reactivation.10 Three of the 7 severe patients of our series, and 3 of 4 patients reported by Ye3 received corticosteroids during the first episode. Furthermore, from our 3 patients who developed no SARS-CoV-2 antibodies more than 21 days after severe symptoms, two received recent chemotherapy and/or rituximab.

An inflammatory rebound triggered by an inappropriate immune response could constitute an alternative explanation to the recurrence of clinical symptoms. Yet, the facts that viral RNA was detected in all patients -some of them with low cycle threshold- and that a viral strain could be cultured during the second episode for one of them rather support re-infection or virus replication's rebound.

This work has some limitations. In addition to the limited number of observations, the cure between episodes was only clinically-defined (except for patient 6) because iterative RT-PCR controls were not recommended by French guidelines. Finally, viral culture could be performed only for two patients, with no phylogenic sequence comparison at this time.

In conclusion, the fact that patients could experience re-activation of a long-lasting virus carriage or might be re-infected, as well as potential long-term effects of drugs or diseases that hamper the immune response, constitutes a substantial point of vigilance for the management of the pandemic at the individual and collective levels. Studies including genomic comparisons of viral strains involved in both episodes, determination of RNA infectivity by viral culture, as well as assessment of innate and adaptive immunity and monitoring inflammatory targets, would be of great value for further understanding the underlying pathophysiology of these COVID-19 recurrences.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare regarding this subject. This work had no financial support.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Nicolas Dumesges and Mrs Alison Mac Lean for the proofreading.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.073.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (50.6KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Kiyuka P.K., Agoti C.N., Munywoki P.K., Njeru R., Bett A., Otieno J.R. Human Coronavirus NL63 Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Patterns in Rural Coastal Kenya. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(11):1728–1739. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy098. 05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang F., Quan Y., Xin Z.-.T., Wrammert J., Ma M.-.J., Lv H. Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2011;186(12):7264–7268. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903490. Jun 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ye G., Pan Z., Pan Y., Deng Q., Chen L., Li J. Clinical characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reactivation. J Infect. 2020;80(5):e14–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ravioli S., Ochsner H., Lindner G. Reactivation of COVID-19 pneumonia: a report of two cases. J Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.008. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 7] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Loconsole D., Passerini F., Palmieri V.O., Centrone F., Sallustio A., Pugliese S. Recurrence of COVID-19 after recovery: a case report from Italy. Infection. 2020:1–3. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01444-1. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 16] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou L., Liu K., Liu H.G. [Cause analysis and treatment strategies of “recurrence” with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients after discharge from hospital]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2020;43(4):281–284. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200229-00219. Apr 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grifoni A., Weiskopf D., Ramirez S.I., Mateus J., Dan J.M., Moderbacher C.R. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell. 2020;181(7):1489–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015. e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao J., Yuan Q., Wang H., Liu W., Liao X., Su Y. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am [Internet] 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa344. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7184337/ Mar 28 [cited 2020 Jun 26]; Available from. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xiao A.T., Tong Y.X., Zhang S. Profile of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary study from 56 COVID-19 patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa460. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 19] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ling Y., Xu S.-.B., Lin Y.-.X., Tian D., Zhu Z.-.Q., Dai F.-.H. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;133(9):1039–1043. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000774. May 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (50.6KB, docx)

Articles from The Journal of Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES