Abstract
Oxidative stress perturbs vascular homeostasis leading to endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases. Vascular reactive oxygen species (ROS) reduce nitric oxide (NO) bioactivity, a hallmark of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. We measured steady-state vascular NO levels through the quantification of heme nitrosylated hemoglobin (5-coordinate-α-HbNO) in venous erythrocytes of healthy human subjects using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. To examine how ROS may influence HbNO complex formation and stability, we identified the pro- and anti-oxidant enzymatic sources in human erythrocytes and their relative impact on intracellular redox state and steady-state HbNO levels. We demonstrated that pro-oxidant enzymes such as NADPH oxidases are expressed and produce a significant amount of ROS at the membrane of healthy erythrocytes. In addition, the steady-state levels of HbNO were preserved when NOX (e.g. NOX1 and NOX2) activity was inhibited. We next evaluated the impact of selective antioxidant enzymatic systems on HbNO stability. Peroxiredoxin 2 and catalase, in particular, played an important role in endogenous and exogenous H2O2 degradation, respectively. Accordingly, inhibitors of peroxiredoxin 2 and catalase significantly decreased erythrocyte HbNO concentration. Conversely, steady-state levels of HbNO were preserved upon supplying erythrocytes with exogenous catalase. These findings support HbNO measurements as indicators of vascular oxidant stress and of NO bioavailability and potentially, as useful biomarkers of early endothelial dysfunction.
Keywords: Nitric oxide, Reactive oxygen species, Erythrocytes, Endothelial dysfunction
1. Introduction
Nitric oxide (NO) produced enzymatically by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in biological systems is a key signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system (reviewed in Refs. [1,2]). Reduced NO production and bioavailability is a major feature of the development of endothelial dysfunction and an accepted hallmark of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders [3]. Different factors aggravate the development of endothelial dysfunction; in particular, oxidative stress can impair eNOS activity on one hand, and potentiate NO degradation on the other. A proper assay of NO bioavailability in the vasculature could help to better stratify the risk and severity of cardiovascular diseases.
We previously described an assay of the steady-state level of heme nitrosylated hemoglobin in the T (tense) state (5-coordinate-α-HbNO) in venous erythrocytes in vivo and proposed it as a surrogate index of vascular NO availability [4]. Circulating NO-donating species can react with deoxygenated hemoglobin within erythrocytes to form this relatively stable complex with heme-Fe(II) which can be quantitatively measured by the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (reviewed in Ref. [5]). In our previous studies, we demonstrated a significant correlation between the HbNO concentrations (quantified in venous erythrocytes) and endothelial function assayed by digital microtonometry in a cohort of healthy volunteers [4], and we proposed that HbNO could be a biomarker to detect endothelial dysfunction at pre-clinical early stage in subjects at risk of developing cardiovascular disease [6]. We showed that despite the expression of a functional NOS in erythrocytes, the NO produced in these cells marginally contributed to the HbNO content compared to NO formed in the vasculature or from exogenous NO donors [7]. However, given the high reactivity of NO, HbNO formation and stability could also be influenced by exogenous or endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), and their contribution, as well as the role of the enzymatic antioxidant system in erythrocytes is still unclear.
Indeed, circulating erythrocytes are known to be exposed to intense oxidative stress from both exogenous and endogenous ROS sources that are tightly associated with the primary erythrocyte function to transport and deliver oxygen through the circulatory system to peripheral tissues (reviewed in Ref. [8]). Oxidative stress and its impact on NO bioavailability has been implicated in disorders affecting erythrocytes of patients with sickle cell disease, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and during the storage of blood for transfusion [9]. ROS produced from white blood cells (neutrophils, monocytes) in plasma, or from endothelial cells in the microvasculature can enter erythrocytes. Additionally, erythrocytes continuously produce intracellular ROS; principally by slow autoxidation of hemoglobin with ensuing formation of methemoglobin (metHb) and superoxide anion (O2.-), subsequently dismutated to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [10]. Recent studies described the participation of NADPH oxidases (NOXs) in endogenous ROS production in red blood cells (RBCs) from patients with sickle cell disease as well as from healthy subjects, but the impact of their activity on NO metabolism were not clear [11]. On the other hand, erythrocytes carry an extensive antioxidant defense system consisting of non-enzymatic low molecular weight antioxidants such as glutathione and ascorbic acid, and enzymatic antioxidants including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx1), and different isoforms of peroxiredoxins, e.g. peroxiredoxin-2 (Prdx2) [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. Their role in the preservation of HbNO or NO bioavailability in erythrocytes has never been studied.
This study aimed to characterize the impact of extracellular and intracellular ROS on HbNO formation and steady-state levels in erythrocytes freshly isolated from healthy human volunteers. We determined: a) the expression and activity of selective NOXs isoforms expressed at the erythrocyte membrane or in the cytoplasm, and the interplay of ROS produced by NOXs with HbNO formation; b) the antioxidant enzymes responsible for ROS degradation and protection of HbNO complex formation and steady-state stability; and c) the determinants of the sensitivity of HbNO to extracellular H2O2. Our results elucidate the mechanisms of the sensitivity of erythrocytes to oxidative stress, as reflected by steady-state levels of HbNO.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Blood collection from experimental animals and study subjects
Human blood was collected from healthy volunteers in the morning after a night fasting (n = 15) by a venopuncture from the median cubital vein into vacutainer tubes containing EDTA (K2E, Vacutainer, BD-Plymouth, UK). All volunteers were individually informed about study procedures and signed a written informed consent. The procedures were approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Saint Luc university hospital of the Université Catholique de Louvain.
2.2. Isolation of red blood cells and ghost membrane preparation
Human erythrocytes were collected after blood centrifugation at 800–1000×g (10 min at 4 °C) and three consecutive washing with an isotonic buffer (phosphate buffered saline, PBS, with 5 mmol/L glucose, pH 7.4) followed by centrifugation at 800×g (5 min), then processed for EPR measurements of HbNO, for immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analysis. The residual content of white blood cells (WBCs) in RBCs fraction was tested by flow cytometry. Whole blood and isolated RBCs samples were incubated with goat serum for 15 min and then with anti-CD235a (detecting erythrocyte glycophorin; 130-117-800 Miltenyi Biotec) and anti-CD45 (detecting leukocyte common antigen; 130-110-773 Miltenyi Biotec) antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were washed in PBS at 200×g for 5 min and ultimately suspended in PBS for data acquisition performed with FACSCantoII™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data analysis with FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
To isolate ghost membranes, human RBCs were lysed with a cold hypotonic buffer (0.5 mmol/L Tris-HCL, 0.05 mmol/L dithiothreitol DTT, and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 8.5) with protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma) at 1:20 (v:v) ratio, and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min and at 37 °C for 15 min. Cytosolic fractions were collected by ultracentrifugation (30,000×g for 35 min at 4 °C) from the supernatant and the pellet was divided in two tubes after re-suspension in 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl and 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8, ultracentrifuged, and washed twice in 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4); one tube with white ghost membranes was used for ROS detection with EPR spin probe (1-Hydroxy-3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidine-HCl, CPH hydrochloride, purchased from EnzoLife Sciences, ALX-430-078), and the pellet from the second tube was suspended into 20 mmol/L Tris-HCL, 0.1 mmol/L DTT and 250 mmol/L d-glucose, pH 7.4, ultracentrifuged and collected in a lysis buffer (20 mmol/L EGTA, 15 mmol/L MgCl2, 80 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate, 10% of Triton-X100, 0.5% of Glycerol and with protease inhibitor cocktail) for Western blot analysis. Human RBCs, white blood cells (WBCs), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) were lysed and collected in RIPA buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100, 0.05% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.4) with protease inhibitor cocktail. Lysate, cytosolic and membrane fractions were sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min to remove cell debris. Total protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay (5000006, BioRad).
2.3. Hemolysis assay
We verified the effect of drug treatments on hemolysis rate of human RBCs as previously described [17]. Isolated erythrocytes were suspended in Krebs-Henseleit buffer at 1:50 (v:v) ratio (in mmol/L: 100 NaCl; 5 KCl; 1 KH2PO4; 1.2 MgSO4; 25 NaHCO3; 5 d-glucose; 20 Hepes; and 0.01 diethyldithiocarbamic acid, sodium salt, DETC, pH 7.4). Erythrocytes were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a V-bottom 96-well plate, using an orbital shaker, with different drugs: 10 μmol/L of 3-AT (3-Amino-1,2,4-triazole; A8056 Sigma); 25 μmol/L of ConoidinA (18080-67-6, Cayman Chemical); 10 μmol/L of H2O2; 110 nmol/L GKT137831 (S7171 Selleckchem); 770 nmol/L VAS2870 (Sigma-Aldrich); 50 units/mL of Catalase (C9322, Sigma); 50 units/mL of SOD (S7571 Sigma-Aldrich). As positive control, we incubated RBCs with 20% of Triton X-100. The plate was then centrifuged at 500×g for 5 min to pellet intact RBCs. Supernatant samples were transferred into a clear plate and the absorbance was measured at 541 nm with a Spectramax i3 (Molecular Devices, LLS, USA).
2.4. Superoxide anion measurements by EPR spectroscopy
15 μg of erythrocyte white ghost membranes collected into 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), were incubated for 10 min with SOD (30 units/mL) or with inhibitors of specific isoforms of NOX: 110 nmol/L, or 140 nmol/L, or 410 nmol/L of GKT137831 to inhibit NOX1, NOX4, NOX5, respectively, and VAS2870 770 nmol/L to inhibit NOX2; l-NAME (Nω-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride, 5 mmol/L, N5751, Sigma) was used to inhibit NOS. NOXs cofactor, β-NADPH (100 μmol/L, N7505 Sigma-Aldrich), and the EPR spin probe, CPH (6.7 mmol/L) were added just before the EPR measurements. The CPH was dissolved in Krebs-Henseleit-DTPA buffer (in mmol/L: 100 NaCl; 5 KCl; 1 KH2PO4; 1.2 MgSO4; 25 NaHCO3; 5 d-glucose; 20 Hepes; 0.1 diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, DTPA; and 0.01 diethyldithiocarbamic acid silver salt, DETC, pH 7.4) that was pre-incubated for 1 night at 1% of O2 in hypoxia workstation in order to avoid spin probe oxidation. The EPR signals of CP. radicals formed in the samples after reaction of CPH with superoxide anions were recorded using an EPR spectrometer (X-band, Magnettech, MS400) at 20 °C; the linear slope was calculated from the kinetics of CP. radicals formation from 5 repeated measurements during 10 min after addition of CPH for each sample; and was used for quantitative assay of superoxide anion production after subtraction of the basal CP. signal. The parameters of the EPR spectrometer for the spectra recording were: microwave frequency ~9.35 GHz; modulation frequency (MF), 100 kHz; microwave power (MW), 10 mW; modulation amplitude (MA), 2 G.
2.5. Western blot analysis
For detection of the NADPH oxidase isoforms, proteins (50 μg) from human RBC lysate, cytosol and ghost membranes were first denatured and then loaded and separated on 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Alternatively, to determine the antioxidant enzymes 20 μg of proteins were subjected to electrophoresis on 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 1% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffer saline solution with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST, Sigma), incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4 °C, washed in TBST and then incubated for 1 h with goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:5000, Jackson). Immunoblotted bands were detected by an Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) using chemiluminescent reagents: HRP substrate (Millipore) [11] or CDP-Star substrate for alkaline phosphatase (WB7106, Invitrogen). The following primary antibodies were utilized: anit-NOX1 (ab55831, Abcam), anti-NOX2/gp91phox (ab80508, Abcam), anti-NOX4 (ab133303, Abcam), anti-NOX5 (ab198213, Abcam), anti-SOD1 (sc-8637, Santa Cruz), anti-Catalase (ab16731, Abcam), anti- GPX1 (ab22604, Abcam), anti-Prdx6 (ab16824, Abcam), anti-AQP1 (AB2219, Millipore) and anti-Prdx1 and Prdx2 were gently provided by Prof. B. Knoops (Louvain Institute of Biomolecular Science and Technology, UCLouvain, Belgium).
2.6. Immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry
Freshly isolated erythrocytes (directly after plasma separation) were smeared across glass slides and fixed with cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min on ice. Erythrocytes were immunoblotted, after extensive washing, with an anti-SOD3 (sc-67089, Santa Cruz) and anti-CD235a (555569, BD) antibodies for all night at 4 °C, and subsequently washed and incubated with secondary antibodies Alexa-488 goat anti-rabbit and Alexa-568 anti-mouse (Invitrogen) for 1 h. The preparations were mounted in fluorescent counting medium (DAKO) and examined in a fluorescence microscope equipped with an ApoTome module for structured illumination (Zeiss AxioImager.z1, USA).
For flow cytometry analysis 40 μl of RBCs (5 × 108 cells), collected directly after plasma separation, were fixed overnight in 1 mL of paraformaldehyde 4% at 4 °C followed by washing with staining buffer (PBS with 1% FBS, 0.09% NaN3) and incubation with anti-SOD3 and with anti-CD235a antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were washed in PBS (with centrifugation at 200×g, 5 min) and incubated with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies for 20 min at RT. RBCs were suspended in staining buffer, data acquisition was performed with a FACSCantoII™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data analysis with FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
2.7. Measurements of erythrocyte HbNO
To measure the steady-state levels of HbNO in human erythrocytes after incubation with a NO-donor, all the samples were frozen in calibrated tubes in liquid nitrogen for low-temperature EPR measurements. EPR spectra were recorded using the X-band EPR spectrometer (MS400, Magnettech) at 77 K using an EPR quartz finger Dewar filled with liquid nitrogen with the following settings: microwave frequency ~ 9.35 GHz; MF, 100 kHz; MW, 20 mW; MA, 7 G, 5 scans. The quantification of HbNO concentrations was performed as described before [7]. Briefly, the HbNO EPR spectrum displays the well resolved triplet hyperfine structure (hfs) Ahf = 16.8 G, at gz ~ 2.01 and the peak-to-peak amplitude of the hfs component was used for 5-coordinate α-HbNO quantification. The calibration curve for HbNO quantification was obtained as described previously [7] using the HbNO complexes synthesized at different concentrations after incubation of erythrocytes with NO-donor system (gradually diluted solution of sodium nitrite and 50 mmol/L of sodium dithionate) in anaerobic condition. The real concentration of synthesized HbNO in these samples was quantified by comparison of the signal intensity obtained by spectra double integration with that of a common EPR standard (Cu[EDTA]5 complex, 50 and 100 μmol/L frozen in 30% glycerol-water solution).
2.8. Measurement of the influence of NADPH oxidases or antioxidant enzymes on HbNO stability by EPR spectroscopy
Human blood daily collected was centrifuged and incubated at 37 °C in hypoxia workstation (INVIVO2400, Ruskinn Technology, Ltd, UK) at 4% of O2 where plasma was removed. The erythrocytes were reconstituted at 50% of haematocrit in Krebs-Henseleit buffer, incubated and continuously mixed with 50 μmol/L of NO-donor((Z)-1-[N-[3-aminopropyl]-N-[4-(3-aminopropylammonio)butyl]-amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate, Spermine-NONOate, Enzo Life Science) for 45 min. A stock solution of the NO-donor was prepared from Spermine-NONOate powder dissolved in NaOH (0.01 M), and diluted in physiological solution (pH 7.4) before immediate addition to cells in hypoxia chamber. The final concentration of 50 μM was chosen based on the concentration-response curve as illustrated in Fig. 4D for optimal signal/noise ratio. Treatment with inhibitors of NOX 1, NOX 2, NOX 4, or vehicle was provided for 30 min at 4% of O2, and the RBCs were frozen in calibrated tubes in liquid nitrogen every 15 min during next 45 min for low-temperature EPR measurements.
The antioxidant enzymes (catalase and Prdx2) were inhibited respectively by 10 μmol/L of 3-AT and by 25 μmol/L of ConoidinA for 30 min at 4% of O2 in RBCs (under continuous mixing) after reconstitution (50% of haematocrit) and Spermine-NONOate addition as described above. Then 10 μmol/L of H2O2 was added for 15 min incubation at 4% of O2 and the samples were frozen every 15 min (up to 45 min) for the EPR measurements.
2.9. Measurement of exogenous catalase and SOD on HbNO stability by EPR spectroscopy
To study the accumulation of HbNO upon incubation with a NO donor, RBCs were collected from venous blood, washed and reconstituted at 50% of haematocrit with isotonic buffer. Erythrocytes were incubated with 50 units of non-PEGylated catalase (C9322, Sigma) or non-PEGylated SOD (S7571, Sigma) at 37 °C during 1 h in a hypoxia workstation (RUSKINN INVIVO2300) at 1% of O2 and at room air (21% of O2). Then, different concentrations of Spermine-NONOate (10-20-50 and 100 μmol/L) were added for 45 min, samples were incubated at 1% of O2 in hypoxia chamber under continuous mixing (with Eppendorf Thermomixer) and afterwards frozen in calibrated tubes in liquid nitrogen for low-temperature EPR measurements.
To study the influence of catalase on HbNO stability, reconstituted RBCs were firstly incubated with 50 μmol/L of NO-donor for 15 min and then with 50 units/ml of catalase for 30 min in hypoxia workstation at 4% of O2. Samples were subsequently treated with H2O2 for 15 min and were collected every 15 min until 45 min.
2.10. ROS detection by flow cytometry in RBCs
Isolated human erythrocytes were re-suspended (5 × 106 cells) in Hank's Buffered Saline Solution (HBSS, Lonza Bioscience) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature and at 4% of O2 with the following reagents: 3-AT (10 μmol/L), ConoidinA (25 μmol/L), catalase (50 units/ml). CM-H2DCFDA (DCFDA; C6827, ThermoFisher Scientific) at 1 μmol/L was added to each sample for additional 25 min incubation at 37 °C and 4% of O2. Samples were washed twice with HBSS and at least 10000 events were analyzed for fluorescence on FACSCantoII™ flow cytometer at room oxygen. For the experiments with antioxidant inhibitors, 10 μmol of H2O2 was added after a first reading and a kinetic curve of ROS formation was measured every 5 min until 45 min for each sample.
2.11. Statistics
Results are shown as mean values ± SEM. Data were statistically analyzed as indicated in the figure legends, using GraphPad Prism 7.01, after verification of normality of the value distributions (using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). The SAS 9.4 software was used for mixed model statistical analysis. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were obtained from at least 10000 events analyzed for fluorescence on FACSCantoII™ flow cytometer and normalized in each experiment to a baseline of control unstained samples. Differences were considered statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Erythrocyte enzymatic sources of ROS and their effect on HbNO stability
3.1.1. NADPH oxidase expression and production of ROS in human isolated RBCs
We first investigated potential enzymatic sources of ROS production in human RBCs from healthy subjects by performing Western blot analysis of the NADPH oxidase isoforms distributed in different erythrocyte compartments. Cell lysates, cytoplasm and “white ghost” membranes from erythrocyte fractions were analyzed for the subcellular localization of the different NOX isoforms; NOX1, NOX2 and NOX5 were detectable in cell lysates and in membrane fractions, while NOX4 was in whole lysate and cytosolic fraction only (Fig. 1A). We confirmed the NOX2 signal observed in membrane fraction by HRP-based detection using the alkaline phosphatase as alternative chemiluminescent substrate (Supp. figure 1A). We next measured the O2.- formation using the EPR spin probe, CPH in ghost membranes isolated from healthy human RBCs. Erythrocyte membrane samples were pretreated with vehicle or SOD or NOX inhibitors, or with l-NAME, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (Fig. 1B). SOD, an antioxidant enzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals to H2O2 and molecular oxygen, reduced detection of O2.- in membrane samples by 60% from control values. Since eNOS is expressed at the membrane of human erythrocytes [7,18], we tested the effect of l-NAME which can inhibit not only NO production but also the O2.- production formed from uncoupled eNOS. We found that l-NAME decreased the O2.- accumulation by 25% compared to control samples (Fig. 1B). We tested further the effect of NOX inhibitors. GKT137831 is a dual inhibitor of both NOX1 and NOX4 with Ki values of 110 and 140 nmol/L but it was also described to inhibit NOX5 (at higher Ki values of 410 nmol/L). VAS2870 preferentially inhibits NOX2 with Ki value of 770 nmol/L. Inhibition of NOX1 and/or NOX2 produced a significant reduction in membrane O2.- production by about 44%; these effects were comparable to that of SOD (Fig. 1B).
3.1.2. HbNO stability is improved by inhibiting NADPH oxidases
The erythrocyte membrane NOX1 and/or NOX2 generated a significant portion of ROS. Therefore, we tested the stability of HbNO after inhibition of these NOXs. Note that erythrocytes were incubated at 4% of O2 (venous oxygen level) where hemoglobin is mostly in T-state conformation amenable to HbNO complex formation. Isolated erythrocytes were pre-incubated with a NO donor and pre-treated with the NOX inhibitors, VAS2870 or GKT137831, or both, or with SOD before freezing samples for low temperature EPR measurements. The calculated HbNO concentrations and typical EPR spectra are shown in Fig. 1C and D. Combining both inhibitors increased the stability of HbNO compared to control samples (66.6 ± 0.1% augmentation after 45 min), grossly to the same extent as the addition of exogenous SOD (73.4 ± 0.3% augmentation after 45 min. We excluded any potential leukocyte contamination in isolated erythrocyte preparations by flow cytometry analysis of the samples after staining with CD235a and CD45 antibodies, specific for erythrocytes and leukocytes respectively (Supp. figure 1B; whole blood was used as positive control). Moreover, no hemolysis was observed after the addition of NOX inhibitors, SOD or catalase to erythrocytes (Supp. figure 1C).
3.2. Endogenous antioxidant enzymatic systems influence the steady-state levels of HbNO in human erythrocytes
3.2.1. Characterization of the enzymatic antioxidant system of human erythrocytes
RBCs have an extensive antioxidant system as demonstrated by our Western blot analysis illustrated on Fig. 2. We detected immunoblotted signals for SOD1 in whole RBC lysates and cytosolic fractions (Fig. 2A); instead SOD3, known as the extracellular isoform, can be attached to the erythrocyte membranes, as illustrated by its immunofluorescence detection at the surface of human RBCs (Fig. 2B), and by flow cytometry (Supp. figure 2A). In these experiments, the erythrocytes were collected after plasma separation without extensive washings in order to preserve all the membrane-associated proteins, and they were double-stained for SOD3 and CD235, or glycophorin A, selectively identifying erythrocytes. Flow cytometry revealed only a limited amount of erythrocytes to be positive for SOD3 (as shown by a shift from the bottom-left quadrant, when they were stained only with secondary antibodies, to the upper-right quadrant of the panel in Supp. figure 2A). In addition, immunoblotted signals for Catalase, Peroxiredoxin 1, 2 and 6 and Glutathione peroxidase 1 were found predominantly in cytosolic and whole lysate fractions of erythrocytes, as shown by western blotting in Fig. 2A (HRP-based detection), and confirmed with immunoblotted band detection by alkaline phosphatase (Supp. figure 1A).
3.2.2. The erythrocyte antioxidant system preserves HbNO stability by neutralizing ROS produced intra- and extracellularly
We have shown that SOD decreased the production of O2.- in erythrocyte membranes and preserved HbNO; however SOD activity was expected to proportionally increase the content of H2O2, another ROS source, as product of its dismutase enzymatic activity. We then investigated the potential role of the other intracellular antioxidant enzymes, as identified above, on ROS and HbNO contents in erythrocytes. In particular, we inhibited peroxideroxin2, the most abundant antioxidant enzyme expressed in these cells [19] with Conoidin A, and catalase with 3-AT. ConoidinA inactivates peroxiredoxin2 by covalently binding to the catalytic cysteine on the enzyme (IC50 = 23 μmol/L) [20,21], while 3-AT binds covalently the active center of the catalase tetrameric form [22]. Fig. 3A and B illustrate the effect of Prxd2 or catalase inhibition on ROS formation (DCFDA) in RBCs in absence (3A) or in presence (3B) of an oxidative challenge during exposure to H2O2. In absence of added H2O2, inhibition of Prdx2, but not catalase, produced an increase of intracellular ROS production in RBCs (96% increase at 20 min) compared with control cells. However, in RBCs exposed to exogenous H2O2, both inhibition of catalase and Prdx2 produced a strong increase of intracellular DCFDA signal, with catalase inhibition producing a doubling of the signal at 20 min (Fig. 3B), which was maintained at 45 min Prdx2 inhibition produced a 60% increase of ROS at 20 min of H2O2 addition which increased up to 132% compared to control at 45 min (Fig. 3B). We next determined the contribution of Prdx2 and catalase on HbNO stability in similar healthy human RBCs at 4% of O2 (equivalent to venous pO2 level). The HbNO EPR signal decreased with time significantly more in erythrocytes treated with 3-AT or ConoidinA by comparison with untreated RBCs (Fig. 3C). This difference seemed to be abrogated under treatment with exogenous H2O2, which uniformly produced a decay of HbNO over time, except that it was significantly more pronounced under catalase inhibition at 15 min (Fig. 3D; by 31.2 ± 0.4% for 3-AT, and 18.3 ± 0.4% for ConoidinA compared with control). Fig. 3E displays the typical EPR spectra of HbNO recorded at 15 min with/without H2O2 addition in RBCs treated with vehicle (a,d), 3-AT (b,e) or ConoidinA (c,f).
These data pointed to catalase as a critical antioxidant enzyme to preserve the intracellular milieu and HbNO content from an oxidant challenge with exogenous H2O2. To confirm this, we tested the effect of exogenous, non-PEGylated catalase on ROS accumulation (Fig. 4A), HbNO stability (Fig. 4B and C) and HbNO formation under extracellular NO administration (Fig. 4D). Extracellular (i.e. cell-impermeable) catalase had no influence on intracellular ROS (DCFDA) in absence of added H2O2 (Fig. 4A). In presence of an oxidant challenge (10 μmol/L of extracellular H2O2) catalase significantly decreased ROS accumulation intracellularly (by 37 ± 0.3% at 20 min compared to control samples) (Fig. 4A). Consistent with its effect to decrease ROS, catalase increased the stability of HbNO over time (e.g. at 45 min, Fig. 4B), as also illustrated in representative EPR spectra in Fig. 4C. In addition, we directly compared the effect of extracellular catalase with that of extracellular (non-PEGylated) SOD on the formation of HbNO in human erythrocytes incubated with graded NO-donor concentrations for 45 min. We observed that while both enzymes had a prominent effect to potentiate HbNO formation under oxygenated condition, the steady-state concentration of HbNO was higher in presence of catalase at 50 and 100 μmol/L of NO-donor (88.5 ± 0.2% increase by catalase over control vs. 70 ± 0.6% by SOD at 50 μmol/L of NO donor; and 2.47 times control values with catalase vs. 2.0 with SOD at 100 μmol/L of NO donor). Conversely, erythrocytes incubated at 1% of O2 showed no difference in HbNO accumulation after treatment with extracellular SOD or catalase (Supp. figure 2B) suggesting that extracellular ROS species are produced by RBCs in oxygenated conditions, and neutralized by SOD and by catalase extracellularly. Of note, all the added drugs (ConoidinA, 3-AT, SOD and catalase) did not increase hemolysis under similar conditions (Supp. figure 1C).
4. Discussion
The main findings from our study can be summarized as follows; i. NOX1, NOX2 and uncoupled eNOS, are the main sources of O2.- in membrane extracts of human erythrocytes; ii. O2.- produced by NOX1-2 decreases steady-state levels of HbNO; iii. among the anti-oxidant armamentarium of RBCs, cytosolic peroxiredoxins (e.g. Prxd2) attenuate the constitutive intracellular production of oxidant species, while both Prdx and catalase cooperate to reduce the intracellular effect of exogenously applied H2O2; iv. the effect of extracellular (exogenously added), but also endogenous catalase (also expressed at the membrane) against degradation of HbNO points to extracellularly generated H2O2 as a significant oxidant species influencing steady-state HbNO levels.
We previously demonstrated that the paramagnetic complex of 5-α-nitrosyl-hemoglobin mainly originates from the exposure of erythrocytes to paracrine sources of NO-donating species and that its abundance in venous erythrocytes correlates with endothelium-dependent vasodilatation [4,7]. In parallel, it also negatively correlated with circulating plasma peroxides, suggesting that it may be a surrogate index of the oxidant stress that generates endothelial dysfunction [6]. RBCs are indeed constantly exposed to large amounts of ROS produced from different intracellular and extracellular sources in the vasculature, which can interfere with HbNO complex accumulation. Among these various sources, ROS can be generated by autoxidation of ferrous ion in partially oxygenated hemoglobin to ferric hemoglobin (metHb) with the release of O2.- [10]. The subsequent oxidation of metHb by H2O2 or another strong oxidant such as peroxynitrite (itself formed by the direct reaction between NO and O2.-), can produce heme in the ferryl form (Hb -Fe4+) or globin radicals that potentiate pro-oxidant activity in RBCs (reviewed [23]). Beside the well-known role of Hb oxidation as ROS source [24], NADPH oxidases (NOXs) could also contribute to oxidative stress. Expression and activity of different isoforms of NOXs have largely been described in endothelial cells, smooth muscle cell, fibroblasts and immune cells [25] but little is known about NOXs in healthy erythrocytes. Recently, activity and catalytic subunits of NOX1 and NOX2 were identified in RBCs of patients with sickle cell disease, [11]. In our study, we identified immunoblotted signals for the catalytic subunits of NOX1, 2 and 5 isoforms in the erythrocyte membrane and cytoplasmic expression of NOX4 in RBCs from healthy volunteers (Fig. 1A). We excluded leukocyte contamination in our erythrocytes preparations by FACS analysis. We used VAS2870 to inhibit NOX2 and GKT137831, described as potent dual inhibitor for NOX1/NOX4 and recently for NOX5 [26,27]. With the caveat regarding specificity for these small molecule inhibitors, we observed that erythrocyte NOX1 and 2 produced most of the O2.-, detected with the CPH spin probe, in erythrocyte “ghost” membranes. Moreover, inhibition of NOX1 and NOX2 preserved the accumulation of HbNO in intact erythrocytes. Recently, the Ca2+ regulated NADPH oxidase, NOX5, was found to be overexpressed in RBCs during vascular diseases [28], as well as in endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells during atherosclerosis, vascular inflammationn, angiogenesis [25,29] and in human cancers [30]. NOX4 is the only isoform that has been shown to produce H2O2 [31] and can have different physiological roles depending on stimulus and cell types [25]. These isoforms may contribute additional ROS production in erythrocytes under pathophysiological conditions.
In the membrane fraction, O2.- could directly react with NO (produced either from paracrine sources or eNOS expressed in the erythrocyte membrane, as shown by us and others [7,32,33], to form the potent oxidant, peroxynitrite (ONOO-). ONOO-, in turn, can produce partial eNOS uncoupling (e.g. by oxidizing its cofactor BH4; or by eNOS S-glutathionylation [[34], [35], [36]]), which we detected from the inhibitory effect of l-NAME (Fig. 1B), or directly oxidize and degrade HbNO. However, it is important to emphasize that NOX produce O2.- in a polarized way, i.e. across the membrane, towards the extracellular space in the present case. There, O2.- is rapidly dismutated to form H2O2 by the extracellular SOD3, which is clearly detected around the intact erythrocyte membrane (Fig. 2B). Accordingly, suppression of O2.- production (by inhibition of NOX1-2 and uncoupled eNOS), or its dismutation (by the constitutively present or exogenously added SOD3; Fig. 1B and C) protect HbNO from degradation.
However, H2O2 itself is an oxidant and, according to conventional thinking, can migrate across cell membranes and, in the case of RBCs, could also react with hemoglobin, as well as other protein cysteine residues with low pKa [37], and interfere with HbNO accumulation. By oxidizing the ferrous and ferric forms of hemoglobin, H2O2 can also produce the highly reactive Fe(IV) ferrylhemoglobin, however such formation was shown to produce only small changes in the structure and property of the membrane of isolated erythrocytes [38], owing probably to high erythrocyte antioxidant activity. The converse, i.e. increased HbNO from activation of eNOS by H2O2, as previously shown in endothelium [[39], [40], [41]], is not supported from our data, at least in erythrocytes. What, then, of the effect of extracellular H2O2 on erythrocyte redox balance and HbNO?
Considering the numerous different sources of oxidant to which they are exposed, it is not surprising that erythrocytes are equipped with an extensive intracellular antioxidant defense system [14,23,42]. H2O2, also produced from the dismutation of O2.- by the cytosolic SOD1, can be decomposed by catalase, glutathione peroxidase and by different isoforms of peroxiredoxin (Prdx1, 2 and 6). We found immunoblotted signals for all these enzymes in the cytosolic lysates of human RBCs (Fig. 2A). Prdx1 and 6 were similarly identified in RBCs, at lower abundance compared to Prdx2, the most abundant of these isoforms [43]. Accordingly, Prdx2 knockout mice developed hemolytic anemia and Heinz body formation already at 5 weeks, while Prdx1 knockout mice showed the onset of malignant tumor and Heinz body hemolytic anemia only after 9 months of age; no erythrocyte abnormalities were reported in mice genetically deleted for Prdx6 [19,44]. On the other hand, catalase was described as the major enzyme responsible for the degradation of exogenous H2O2 in erythrocytes [45,46]. Indeed, RBCs from catalase knockout mice were exquisitely sensitive to exogenously applied H2O2, that induced metHb formation, contrary to RBCs from Prdx2 knockout mice, although the latter displayed constitutively (i.e. in absence of added H2O2) increased intracellular H2O2, suggesting that Prdx2 mainly controls intracellular H2O2 formation [19,47]. Our own data would be in line with this paradigm, as inhibition of Prdx2 (by ConoidinA), but not catalase (with 3-AT) increased the constitutive (i.e. without exogenous H2O2) ROS detection (Fig. 3A); whereas, upon addition of H2O2, ROS accumulation rose more rapidly in cells after inhibition of catalase compared with Prdx2 inhibition (Fig. 3B). The slower kinetics are probably due to the slow reduction cycle of dimerized Prdx2 by a thioredoxin reductase [48]. Over time (45 min), inhibition of each enzyme results in the same level of intracellular ROS, suggesting a participation, albeit delayed, of the (mostly cytosolic) Prdx2 (Fig. 3B). In fact, others showed that Prdx2 contributed to the reduction of peroxynitrite [49], and was even able to associate to the plasma membrane where it reduced lipid hydroperoxides and neutralized ROS produced by Hb autoxidation [50]. This probably explains the observed increase in heme degradation in Prdx2 knockout mice [16] and the decay in HbNO stability under constitutive ROS production after ConoidinA treatment (Fig. 3C) in our hands. The inhibition of catalase by 3-AT similarly decreased the HbNO steady-state levels under basal conditions (Fig. 3C), but had a more consistent effect than Prdx2 inhibition after addition of exogenous H2O2 up to 15min (Fig. 3D), consistent with the early difference in kinetics of ROS accumulation in Fig. 3B. The other enzymatic systems probably relay these first two antioxidants at later time points. Indeed, GPx1 that we also found to be expressed in cytosolic fractions of RBCs (Fig. 2A), was shown to participate in the reduction of exogenous H2O2 [47]. Consistent with our observations upon inhibition of endogenous catalase, we found that pre-incubation with extracellular (non-PEGylated, i.e. membrane impermeable) catalase decreased intracellular ROS and preserved HbNO formation and stability in human erythrocytes incubated with exogenous H2O2 (Fig. 4). Of note, this was reproduced with extracellular SOD or catalase in erythrocytes at 21% of O2, demonstrating the preservation of HbNO by these enzymes under constitutive production of ROS at air oxygen level (Fig. 4D). By reducing O2.−extracellularly, SOD was expected to preserve HbNO accumulation but so did catalase, suggesting that constitutively produced H2O2 is a significant extracellular oxidant species limiting intracellular HbNO formation. Contrary to conventional thinking, the transmembrane passage of H2O2 may not be entirely passive. Specific members of the family of membrane proteins, Aquaporins, were recently proposed as candidates for the facilitated transport of exogenous H2O2 across plasma membranes [51]. As one of the most abundant proteins expressed in erythrocytes, Aquaporin1 would likely be involved in this process. Indeed, molecular modeling of Aquaporin1 suggested that the central water pore may allow the passage of H2O2 in addition to water, and recent evidence demonstrated that murine aquaporin 1 facilitated H2O2 migration into different cells [[51], [52], [53], [54]].
Our model has some limitations, i.e. from our use of a relatively high (50 μM) concentration of NONOate which may seem to deviate from (patho)physiological concentrations of endogenously produced NO. Note, however, that the final concentration of bioavailable NO in solution may differ from that calculated from the NO donor (in fact, using spin-trapping EPR spectroscopy, we found it not to exceed 20% of the calculated dose in our experimental conditions). Nevertheless, this concentration allowed us to efficiently test the dynamic formation of HbNO in intact erythrocytes with the optimal signal/noise ratio. It is also important to note that we observed reproducible HbNO signals in the range of 100–200 nmol/l in intact erythrocytes freshly drawn from normal volunteers, in absence of incubation with exogenous NO donors [4]. While more prospective studies in large cohorts of patients will be needed to establish the validity of HbNO measurement as a biomarker of vascular health, our study identifies critical redox mechanisms influencing the dynamic formation of HbNO which are likely to be even more prevailing in erythrocytes from patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
In conclusion, our work shows that the steady-state level of HbNO is profoundly influenced by the redox balance between pro-oxidant and anti-oxidant enzymatic systems in human erythrocytes. In particular, we identified a significant contribution of extracellular H2O2, the transport of which may be facilitated by Aquaporin-1 richly expressed in the erythrocyte membrane. This points to HbNO measurements as indicators of vascular oxidant stress, as well as NO bioavailability and potentially, as useful biomarkers of early endothelial dysfunction.
Acknowledgments
Work supported by grants from the FNRS-WELBIO (AGR X100218F), the F.R.S. - FNRS (CR J023516F), the Région Wallonne (NORPE project, 1217907), The Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles (ARC16/21-074) to JLB. FDZ was the recipient of a Fellowship from FRS-FRIA.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101399.
Contributor Information
Irina I. Lobysheva, Email: irina.lobysheva@uclouvain.be.
Jean-Luc Balligand, Email: jl.balligand@uclouvain.be.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Lundberg J.O., Gladwin M.T., Weitzberg E. Strategies to increase nitric oxide signalling in cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;14(9):623–641. doi: 10.1038/nrd4623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Helms C.C., Gladwin M.T., Kim-Shapiro D.B. Erythrocytes and vascular function: oxygen and nitric oxide. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:125. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhao Y., Vanhoutte P.M., Leung S.W. Vascular nitric oxide: beyond eNOS. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;129(2):83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lobysheva, Biller P., Gallez B., Beauloye C., Balligand J.L. Nitrosylated hemoglobin levels in human venous erythrocytes correlate with vascular endothelial function measured by digital reactive hyperemia. PLoS One. 2013;8(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Henry Y.A., Guissani A., Ducastel Ba. Chapman & Hall; New York ;Austin: 1997. Nitric Oxide Research from Chemistry to Biology : EPR Spectroscopy of Nitrosylated Compounds; p. 331. Landes. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lobysheva, van Eeckhoudt S., Dei Zotti F., Rifahi A., Pothen L., Beauloye C. Heme-nitrosylated hemoglobin and oxidative stress in women consuming combined contraceptives. Clinical application of the EPR spectroscopy. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017;108:524–532. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dei Zotti F., Lobysheva, Balligand J.L. Nitrosyl-hemoglobin formation in rodent and human venous erythrocytes reflects NO formation from the vasculature in vivo. PLoS One. 2018;13(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rifkind J.M., Mohanty J.G., Nagababu E., Salgado M.T., Cao Z. Potential modulation of vascular function by nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species released from erythrocytes. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:690. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kahn M.J., Maley J.H., Lasker G.F., Kadowitz P.J. Updated role of nitric oxide in disorders of erythrocyte function. Cardiovasc. Haematol. Disord. - Drug Targets. 2013;13(1):83–87. doi: 10.2174/1871529x11313010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abugo O.O., Rifkind J.M. Oxidation of hemoglobin and the enhancement produced by nitroblue tetrazolium. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269(40):24845–24853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.George A., Pushkaran S., Konstantinidis D.G., Koochaki S., Malik P., Mohandas N. Erythrocyte NADPH oxidase activity modulated by Rac GTPases, PKC, and plasma cytokines contributes to oxidative stress in sickle cell disease. Blood. 2013;121(11):2099–2107. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-441188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gonzales R., Auclair C., Voisin E., Gautero H., Dhermy D., Boivin P. Superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase in red blood cells from patients with malignant diseases. Cancer Res. 1984;44(9):4137–4139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee T.H., Kim S.U., Yu S.L., Kim S.H., Park D.S., Moon H.B. Peroxiredoxin II is essential for sustaining life span of erythrocytes in mice. Blood. 2003;101(12):5033–5038. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mohanty J.G., Nagababu E., Rifkind J.M. Red blood cell oxidative stress impairs oxygen delivery and induces red blood cell aging. Front. Physiol. 2014;5:84. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nagababu E., Chrest F.J., Rifkind J.M. Hydrogen-peroxide-induced heme degradation in red blood cells: the protective roles of catalase and glutathione peroxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1620(1–3):211–217. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(02)00537-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nagababu E., Mohanty J.G., Friedman J.S., Rifkind J.M. Role of peroxiredoxin-2 in protecting RBCs from hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress. Free Radic. Res. 2013;47(3):164–171. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2012.756138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Evans B.C., Nelson C.E., Shann S.Y., Beavers K.R., Kim A.J., Li H. Ex vivo red blood cell hemolysis assay for the evaluation of pH-responsive endosomolytic agents for cytosolic delivery of biomacromolecular drugs. J. Vis. Exp. 2013;(73) doi: 10.3791/50166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kleinbongard P., Schulz R., Rassaf T., Lauer T., Dejam A., Jax T. Red blood cells express a functional endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Blood. 2006;107(7):2943–2951. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-3992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Low F.M., Hampton M.B., Winterbourn C.C. Peroxiredoxin 2 and peroxide metabolism in the erythrocyte. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2008;10(9):1621–1630. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brizuela M., Huang H.M., Smith C., Burgio G., Foote S.J., McMorran B.J. Treatment of erythrocytes with the 2-cys peroxiredoxin inhibitor, Conoidin A, prevents the growth of Plasmodium falciparum and enhances parasite sensitivity to chloroquine. PLoS One. 2014;9(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haraldsen J.D., Liu G., Botting C.H., Walton J.G., Storm J., Phalen T.J. Identification of Conoidin a as a covalent inhibitor of peroxiredoxin ii. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009;7:3040–3048. doi: 10.1039/B901735F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tephly T.R., Mannering G.J., Parks R.E., Jr. Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of liver and erythrocyte catalase activity by 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (AT) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1961;134:77–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rifkind J.M., Nagababu E. Hemoglobin redox reactions and red blood cell aging. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2013;18(17):2274–2283. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cimen M.Y. Free radical metabolism in human erythrocytes. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2008;390(1–2):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Konior A., Schramm A., Czesnikiewicz-Guzik M., Guzik T.J. NADPH oxidases in vascular pathology. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2014;20(17):2794–2814. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Altenhofer S., Radermacher K.A., Kleikers P.W., Wingler K., Schmidt H.H. Evolution of NADPH oxidase inhibitors: selectivity and mechanisms for target engagement. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2015;23(5):406–427. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cifuentes-Pagano M.E., Meijles D.N., Pagano P.J. Nox inhibitors & therapies: rational design of peptidic and small molecule inhibitors. Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 2015;21(41):6023–6035. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666151029112013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bedard K., Krause K.H. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87(1):245–313. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lassegue B., Griendling K.K. NADPH oxidases: functions and pathologies in the vasculature. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010;30(4):653–661. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.181610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Antony S., Wu Y., Hewitt S.M., Anver M.R., Butcher D., Jiang G. Characterization of NADPH oxidase 5 expression in human tumors and tumor cell lines with a novel mouse monoclonal antibody. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013;65:497–508. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Takac I., Schroder K., Zhang L., Lardy B., Anilkumar N., Lambeth J.D. The E-loop is involved in hydrogen peroxide formation by the NADPH oxidase Nox4. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286(15):13304–13313. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.192138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cortese-Krott M.M., Rodriguez-Mateos A., Sansone R., Kuhnle G.G., Thasian-Sivarajah S., Krenz T. Human red blood cells at work: identification and visualization of erythrocytic eNOS activity in health and disease. Blood. 2012;120(20):4229–4237. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang J., Gonon A.T., Sjoquist P.O., Lundberg J.O., Pernow J. Arginase regulates red blood cell nitric oxide synthase and export of cardioprotective nitric oxide bioactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110(37):15049–15054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307058110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Landmesser U., Dikalov S., Price S.R., McCann L., Fukai T., Holland S.M. Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin leads to uncoupling of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in hypertension. J. Clin. Investig. 2003;111(8):1201–1209. doi: 10.1172/JCI14172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schramm A., Matusik P., Osmenda G., Guzik T.J. Targeting NADPH oxidases in vascular pharmacology. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2012;56(5–6):216–231. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vasquez-Vivar J., Kalyanaraman B., Martasek P. The role of tetrahydrobiopterin in superoxide generation from eNOS: enzymology and physiological implications. Free Radic. Res. 2003;37(2):121–127. doi: 10.1080/1071576021000040655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rhee S.G., Bae Y.S., Lee S.R., Kwon J. Hydrogen peroxide: a key messenger that modulates protein phosphorylation through cysteine oxidation. Sci. STKE. 2000;2000(53):pe1. doi: 10.1126/stke.2000.53.pe1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sztiller M., Puchala M., Kowalczyk A., Bartosz G. The influence of ferrylhemoglobin and methemoglobin on the human erythrocyte membrane. Redox Rep. 2006;11(6):263–271. doi: 10.1179/135100006X155012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ray R., Murdoch C.E., Wang M., Santos C.X., Zhang M., Alom-Ruiz S. Endothelial Nox4 NADPH oxidase enhances vasodilatation and reduces blood pressure in vivo. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011;31(6):1368–1376. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.219238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schroder K., Zhang M., Benkhoff S., Mieth A., Pliquett R., Kosowski J. Nox4 is a protective reactive oxygen species generating vascular NADPH oxidase. Circ. Res. 2012;110(9):1217–1225. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.267054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Thomas S.R., Chen K., Keaney J.F., Jr. Hydrogen peroxide activates endothelial nitric-oxide synthase through coordinated phosphorylation and dephosphorylation via a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277(8):6017–6024. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109107200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rifkind J.M., Nagababu E., Ramasamy S., Ravi L.B. Hemoglobin redox reactions and oxidative stress. Redox Rep. 2003;8(5):234–237. doi: 10.1179/135100003225002817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bhattacharya D., Mukhopadhyay D., Chakrabarti A. Hemoglobin depletion from red blood cell cytosol reveals new proteins in 2-D gel-based proteomics study. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2007;1(6):561–564. doi: 10.1002/prca.200700178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Neumann C.A., Krause D.S., Carman C.V., Das S., Dubey D.P., Abraham J.L. Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression. Nature. 2003;424(6948):561–565. doi: 10.1038/nature01819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mueller S., Riedel H.D., Stremmel W. Direct evidence for catalase as the predominant H2O2 -removing enzyme in human erythrocytes. Blood. 1997;90(12):4973–4978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Scott M.D., Lubin B.H., Zuo L., Kuypers F.A. Erythrocyte defense against hydrogen peroxide: preeminent importance of catalase. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1991;118(1):7–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Johnson R.M., Ho Y.S., Yu D.Y., Kuypers F.A., Ravindranath Y., Goyette G.W. The effects of disruption of genes for peroxiredoxin-2, glutathione peroxidase-1, and catalase on erythrocyte oxidative metabolism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010;48(4):519–525. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Low F.M., Hampton M.B., Peskin A.V., Winterbourn C.C. Peroxiredoxin 2 functions as a noncatalytic scavenger of low-level hydrogen peroxide in the erythrocyte. Blood. 2007;109(6):2611–2617. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-048728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Manta B., Hugo M., Ortiz C., Ferrer-Sueta G., Trujillo M., Denicola A. The peroxidase and peroxynitrite reductase activity of human erythrocyte peroxiredoxin 2. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009;484(2):146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cha M.K., Yun C.H., Kim I.H. Interaction of human thiol-specific antioxidant protein 1 with erythrocyte plasma membrane. Biochemistry. 2000;39(23):6944–6950. doi: 10.1021/bi000034j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bienert G.P., Chaumont F. Aquaporin-facilitated transmembrane diffusion of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1840(5):1596–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Al Ghouleh I., Frazziano G., Rodriguez A.I., Csanyi G., Maniar S., St Croix C.M. Aquaporin 1, Nox1, and Ask1 mediate oxidant-induced smooth muscle cell hypertrophy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013;97(1):134–142. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Almasalmeh A., Krenc D., Wu B., Beitz E. Structural determinants of the hydrogen peroxide permeability of aquaporins. FEBS J. 2014;281(3):647–656. doi: 10.1111/febs.12653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Krenc D., Song J., Almasalmeh A., Wu B., Beitz E. The arginine-facing amino acid residue of the rat aquaporin 1 constriction determines solute selectivity according to its size and lipophilicity. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2014;31(7–8):228–238. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2014.960493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.