Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2020 Mar 6;84(4):2074–2087. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28230

Spin-lock Relaxation Rate Dispersion Reveals Spatiotemporal Changes Associated with Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis in Murine Kidney

Feng Wang 1,2,*, Daniel C Colvin 1, Suwan Wang 3, Hua Li 1, Zhongliang Zu 1,2, Raymond C Harris 3, Ming-Zhi Zhang 3,, John C Gore 1,2,4,
PMCID: PMC7329575  NIHMSID: NIHMS1565716  PMID: 32141646

Abstract

Purpose:

To develop and evaluate a reliable non-invasive means for assessing the severity and progression of fibrosis in kidneys. We employed spin-lock MR imaging with different locking fields to detect and characterize progressive renal fibrosis in an hHB-EGFTg/Tg mouse model.

Methods:

Male hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice, a well-established model of progressive fibrosis, and age-matched normal wild type (WT) mice, were imaged at 7T at ages 5–7, 11–13 and 30–40 weeks. Spin-lock relaxation rates R1ρ were measured at different locking fields (frequencies) and the resultant dispersion curves were fit to a model of exchanging water pools. The obtained MRI parameters were evaluated as potential indicators of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in kidney. Histological examinations of renal fibrosis were also carried out post-mortem following MRI.

Results:

Histology detected extensive fibrosis in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice, in which collagen deposition and reductions in capillary density were observed in the fibrotic regions of kidneys. R2 and R1ρ values at different spin-lock powers clearly dropped in the fibrotic region as fibrosis progressed. There was less variation in the asymptotic locking field relaxation rate R1ρ between the groups. The exchange parameter Sρ and the inflection frequency ωinfl changed by larger factors.

Conclusion:

Both Sρ and ωinfl depend primarily on the average exchange rate between water and other chemically shifted resonances such as hydroxyls and amides. Spin-lock relaxation rate dispersion, rather than single measurements of relaxation rates, provides more comprehensive and specific information on spatiotemporal changes associated with tubulointerstitial fibrosis in murine kidney.

Keywords: Spin-lock, R1ρ, dispersion, relaxation, renal fibrosis, mouse kidney disease, MRI

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Renal fibrosis is a characteristic of chronic kidney diseases, and it induces further kidney injury and ultimately leads to renal failure.(1,2) It is crucial to assess the spatial extent of fibrosis in kidneys and its changes over time in order to guide treatment and track the efficacy of anti-fibrotic agents. However, renal fibrosis often progresses without overt increases in urinary albumin excretion, blood pressure, or serum creatinine until it pervades most of the kidney.(3) Currently, urine and blood markers cannot provide sensitive assessments of renal fibrosis, while renal biopsy is quite limited in assessing fibrosis because it is invasive and subject to sampling bias. There is thus no reliable non-invasive means for assessing the severity and progression of fibrosis in individual kidneys (4,5) and so it would be clinically valuable to develop and validate noninvasive imaging methods that can safely and accurately assess kidney fibrotic burden.

In vivo multi-parametric MRI techniques permit the evaluation of structural, functional, and metabolic aspects of kidney diseases.(68) Furthermore, the application of noninvasive MRI methods to mouse models allows evaluation of the spatial and temporal progression of renal disease.(911) Recent advances in MRI have raised its role in the diagnostic assessment of renal fibrosis, but novel proposed MRI techniques are still under evaluation.(3) These include blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) MRI, diffusion weighted MRI (DWI), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and magnetization transfer (MT) imaging.(1220) These techniques have limitations even though they have shown potential for detecting renal fibrosis.(1220) Proton relaxation can provide information on the dynamics of water molecules in different biological environments. While dipolar cross-relaxation dominates the longitudinal relaxation in hydrated macromolecules,(2124) chemical exchange between solvent water and labile protons in various metabolites and mobile macromolecules makes significant contributions to the measured transverse relaxation rates of water in samples of biomolecules and tissues,(25) especially at high fields.

Chemical exchange between water protons and exchangeable protons is a dominant process for transverse relaxation in collagen.(22,26) In principle, estimates of exchange parameters can be obtained from multi-echo (e.g. CPMG) pulse sequences using different pulse rates (27) but when exchange is fast the necessary high pulse rates are not achievable. Spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame, R1ρ provides an alternative approach for assessing exchange in the fast exchange regime. In spin-lock imaging, the equilibrium magnetization is rotated into the transverse plane first. Then this magnetization relaxes in the presence of an on-resonant RF locking pulse, and the corresponding relaxation rate with regard to the spin-lock duration is R1ρ. While measurements of R1ρ at a single locking pulse amplitude can be informative, they may not provide any more insight than, for example, measurements of R1 or R2. However, the variation of relaxation rates R1ρ with the amplitude of the locking field, which is relaxation rate dispersion, provides a basis for specifically isolating exchange contributions and for quantitatively estimating the exchange rates and chemical shifts of exchanging protons.(2831)

T1ρ(= 1/R1ρ) mapping at a single moderate spin-lock amplitude has previously been applied to study fibrosis in liver and kidney (3234) but there have not been previous studies which reported changes in the dispersion or exchange during the progression of fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of changes in parameters obtainable from measurements of R1ρ dispersion to corresponding changes in the composition of tissue as fibrosis developed in a mouse model.

Animal models play an important role in studying fibrosis and can be used for evaluating the application of advanced MRI techniques. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and renal fibrosis. A fibrotic kidney mouse model (35) has become well established with selective activation of EGFR by overexpressing human heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (hHBEGFTg/Tg), in renal proximal tubule epithelium. With selective and persistent tubulointerstitial fibrosis induced in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM), this murine hHB-EGFTg/Tg model provides a useful and realistic platform for the assessment and treatment of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease. In this study, we focused on the potential value of parameters derived from spin-lock relaxation dispersion imaging for detecting tubulointerstitial fibrosis in this renal fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg mouse model.(35)

2 |. METHODS

2.1 |. Animals

Male hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice, a well-established model of progressive fibrosis,(35) and normal wild type (WT) mice, both on C57BL/6 backgrounds, were studied at 5–7, 11–13 and 30–40 weeks of age. All procedures followed NIH guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals.

2.2 |. MRI

MR images were acquired on a 16-cm bore Bruker horizontal 7T magnet, using a Doty 38-mm inner diameter transceiver coil. For imaging, mice were immobilized and anesthetized (isoflurane 1.0–1.5%), and a constant rectal temperature of 37.5 °C was maintained throughout each imaging session using a warm-air feedback system (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY, USA). T1-weighted images were acquired to guide data collection (Supporting Information Figure S1). A fast spin-echo sequence (TR = 5500 ms, RARE-factor = 4, resolution = 0.25 × 0.25 × 1 mm3, multiple echo times of 14, 42, 70, 98, 126 ms) was used to achieve T2 contrast and calculate R2(= 1/T2) maps.

Spin-lock images were acquired in a transverse plane (Supporting Information Figure S1) using a fast spin echo sequence preceded by a conventional preparatory spin-lock cluster consisting of a 90° excitation pulse followed by a single rectangular locking pulse with duration of τ and a −90° excitation pulse (90xτy – 90-x). Imaging parameters were TR/TE = 3000/24 msec, RARE factor = 8, resolution = 0.25 × 0.25 × 1 mm3. Sets of images were acquired with different spin-lock amplitudes SLB1 (locking frequencies at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500 and 3000 Hz). Spin-lock times at each spin-lock amplitude were varied as 1, 5, 15, 25, 35, 55, 75 ms (Supporting Information Figure S1).

2.3 |. Histology

Paraffin tissue sections were stained with picrosirius red using standard procedure for histological confirmation.(20)

2.4 |. Data analysis

MRI data were analyzed using MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, US). All intra-session images used in quantification were co-registered using a rigid registration algorithm. R2 values were calculated pixel-by-pixel by fitting signals to a single exponential decay with echo time. R1ρ values were obtained pixel-by-pixel for each locking field by fitting signals to a single exponential decay with locking time. Then the regional dispersion of R1ρ with locking frequency ω1 was fit to a model proposed by Chopra et al. (36) as in previous studies.(28)

R1ρ=R2fit+R1ρω12sρ21+ω12sρ2 (1)

The fits provided values of transverse relaxation rate R2fit, R1ρ at asymptotic spin-lock frequency (R1ρ), and an exchange rate-weighted parameter Sρ. In realistic cases,

Sρ2ksw2+Δωs2 (2)

where ksw is the chemical exchange rate of protons with resonance frequency offset from water Δωs. When the second derivative of equation 1 with respect to ω1 is equal to zero, the dispersion curve undergoes an inflection, and the corresponding inflection frequency ωinfl of the dispersion curve was calculated (29).

ωinfl=Sρ2/3 (3)

T2-weighted images were used for manual selection (37) of regions of interest (ROIs), such as cortex (CR), outer stripe of outer medulla (OSOM), inner stripe of outer medulla (ISOM), and inner medulla and papilla (IM+P) for quantification. It is often challenging to distinguish cortex and OSOM from all the kidneys of disease models.(38) Therefore, in this work, the defined CR+OSOM region included both renal cortex and OSOM for regional R1ρ dispersion analyses. Regions suspected to have fibrosis were identified as areas with low R2 and R1ρ values. The normal R2 and R1ρ ranges of CR+OSOM region were defined as Mean ± 1.96SD (standard deviation, 95%) of R2 and R1ρ respectively from normal WT mouse kidneys, and the regions with significantly lower R2 and R1ρ were defined as voxels whose respective values were out of this normal range in the CR+OSOM region. Regions with values below the respective lower threshold Mean–1.96SD of CR+OSOM were detected and percent areas of those regions in the kidney were calculated. The positive areas below the respective R2 and R1ρ thresholds were quantified as tR2 or tR1ρ.

tR2=Area(R2<R2threshold)TotalArea×100% (4)
tR1ρ=Area(R1ρ<R1ρthreshold)TotalArea×100% (5)

The detected abnormal areas were suspected to have fibrosis (positive fibrosis areas), and their averaged R2 and R1ρ (mR2 and mR1ρ) and parameters derived from the Chopra model fits were then quantified and compared to respective values of normal tissues in WT kidneys.

The histological fibrosis index was evaluated using the same procedure as in our previous work.(17,20)

Positivepicrosiriusred=PositiveAreaTotalArea×100% (6)

The correlations between different measures were evaluated across kidneys, using the Pearson correlation function. Student’s t-tests were used for evaluating the differences between groups. It was considered significant when the false discovery rate adjusted p < 0.05. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also calculated to show true positive rates (sensitivity) and false positive rates (1-specificity) of all the MRI and histological measures.

3 |. RESULTS

3.1 |. Histological findings of typical features in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney

Extensive fibrosis in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice was revealed by picrosirius red staining (Figure 1), in which collagen deposition and capillary density reduction were observed mainly in the OSOM of kidneys. The accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins showed up in 6-week hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney, and the relative volume occupied by abnormal tubulointerstitial matrix became larger when mice aged (Figure 1). However, other common features of kidney diseases, such as tubular dilation and atrophy,(9,11,3739) were not evident in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney (Figure 1). Previous histologic studies of the hHB-EGFTg/Tg model also revealed that fibrosis predominated in its renal disease progression.(35)

Figure 1. Comparison of histological results from picrosirius red stains.

Figure 1.

Representative WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney tissues were compared side by side at different magnification level. The middle and lower panels are magnifications from OSOM. ISOM: inner stripe of outer medulla. OSOM: outer stripe of outer medulla. Intensive fibrosis is shown in red in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney (indicated by arrows in OSOM).

3.2 |. Features of R2 and R in normal mouse kidneys

In normal WT mice, T2-weighted images differentiated cortex from OM and IM+P with good contrast (Figure 2). However, OSOM had T2 values closer to cortex than to ISOM. IM+P exhibited highest T2 values (lowest R2) among all the regions in kidneys (Figure 2B). Regional T1ρ values showed similar trends as T2. OSOM showed quite similar T1ρ as cortex (Figure 2B), much lower than ISOM and IM+P. Figure 3 compares the variability of averaged R2 and R1ρ of cortex, OSOM, ISOM, and IM+P regions across WT kidneys (N=16). R1ρ at different spin-lock powers also showed quite similar regional trends as R2 (Figure 3). No significant differences were observed between cortex and OSOM regions for R2 and R1ρ across WT mouse kidneys (Figure 3). This was the basis for grouping cortex and OSOM together for assessing normal distributions of R2 and R1ρ and setting up respective thresholds for detecting abnomal outliers.

Figure 2. In vivo spin-lock mapping of normal WT kidneys.

Figure 2.

(A) T2-weighted, and conventional T2 and R2 maps. 1, cortex (CR); 2, outer stripe of outer medulla (OSOM); 3, inner stripe of outer medulla (ISOM); 4, inner medulla and papilla (IM+P). (B) Selected spin-lock maps at different spin-lock powers with locking frequencies at 200, 600, 1000, 1500, and 2500 Hz respectively.

Figure 3. Group comparison of regional MRI measures in normal WT kidneys (N = 16).

Figure 3.

The regional R2 and R1ρ at selected locking frequencies (400, 1000, 1500, 2000 and 3000 Hz) were shown for comparison. In the boxplots, middle lines and circles indicate median and mean values across subjects respectively. Crosses indicate outliers in each group. CR, cortex; OSOM, outer stripe of outer medulla; ISOM, inner stripe of outer medulla; IM+P, inner medulla and papilla. Significant parametric differences across regions are indicated by asterisks. *p<10−8, **p<10−12, ***p<10−15, and ****p<10−17 versus measures of CR regions.

3.3 |. Relaxation changes in progressive hHB-EGFTg/Tg fibrosis model

In hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice, the T2 and T1ρ contrasts in some derived parametric maps were dissimilar to those found in normal WT mice (Figure 4), consistent with the associated pathologic changes occurring in OSOM of kidneys. The characteristic T2 and T1ρ maps of hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney showed a ring-shaped stripe of very high T2 and T1ρ values at the final stage of fibrosis progress, located in OSOM (indicated by arrows in Figure 4A). Thus, unusually low R2 and R1ρ were observed in OSOM. The R2 and R1ρ maps were also compared between WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys at different fibrosis stages (Figure 5). Longitudinal decreases of R2 and R1ρ were observed in OSOM regions as fibrosis progressed in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys from week 7 to week 33 (Figure 5).

Figure 4. In vivo spin-lock mapping of a representative fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg mouse.

Figure 4.

(A) T2-weighted, and conventional T2 and R2 maps. 1, cortex (CR); 2, outer stripe of outer medulla (OSOM); 3, inner stripe of outer medulla (ISOM); 4, inner medulla and papilla (IM+P). Arrows indicate that fibrosis occurs in OSOM regions. (B) Selected spin-lock maps at different spin-lock powers with locking frequencies at 200, 600, 1000, 1500, and 2500 Hz respectively. One subject with severe fibrosis in the OSOM is shown.

Figure 5. Progress of renal fibrosis in hHB-EGFTg/Tg model.

Figure 5.

Comparison of representative T2-weighted (T2W) images and R2 and R1ρ maps of normal (week 33) and fibrotic kidneys at different stage (week 7, 12 and 33) during fibrosis progress. R1ρ maps from locking frequency 1000 Hz are shown. Double-headed arrows in red, orange, and green indicate CR+OSOM, ISOM and IM+P regions respectively, and the yellow crosses indicate the thin OSOM stripes.

Because it was difficult to separate OSOM from cortex in some fibrotic kidneys, longitudinal changes of R2 and R1ρ were first compared in CR+OSOM regions (Supporting Information Figure S2) across kidneys. While the R2 and R1ρ measures in fibrotic kidneys all showed significantly lower values than those of WT kidneys, significant differences among different fibrotic stages were not evident. Both R2 and R1ρ are sensitive to fibrosis at an early stage (5–7 weeks). R1ρ at optimum locking frequencies (1000 Hz) consistently showed most significance in detecting differences between WT and fibrotic kidneys than R2 and R1ρ measured at other locking frequencies (Supporting Information Figure S2). ROC analyses of observed R2 and R1ρ measures in CR+OSOM regions at different fibrotic stages are shown in Supporting Information Figure S3 (left column) and Supporting Information Table S1. Among all the R2 and R1ρ measures, R1ρ obtained with locking fields in the range 600–1500 Hz showed high AROC (area under the curve) for detecting the differences between normal and fibrotic kidneys at different stages (Supporting Information Table S1). R1ρ at optimum locking frequencies showed larger AROC than R2. We noticed that R1ρ with locking field 1000 Hz consistently showed large AROC and high combined sensitivity and specificity for detecting fibrosis at different stages. Thus, we selected it for further threshold analysis in this study.

3.4 |. R2 and R distributions and threshold measurements

The changes of MRI parameters induced by fibrosis can be significantly underestimated when normal tissues in both cortex and OSOM were included in group analyses of fibrotic kidneys. A threshold analysis was conducted to identify abnormally low R2 and R1ρ areas in CR+OSOM regions that may be associated with fibrosis. Comparisons of R2 and R1ρ distributions at spin-lock frequency 1000 Hz in CR+OSOM regions in representative normal WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys are shown in Figure 6. The regional Mean and SD of R2 and R1ρ have been quantified across voxels in the CR+OSOM region in each normal WT kidney, and these values were averaged across normal kidneys to set up the R2 and R1ρ thresholds for identifying abnormal clusters with lower values. The respective Mean ± SD values were 26.31 ± 2.63 and 20.30 ± 2.16 Hz for R2 and R1ρ (locking field 1000 Hz) of CR+OSOM regions (N=16). The normal range was set at Mean ± 1.96SD based on the averaged values across pixels (indicated by the green dashed lines in Figure 6) of the CR+OSOM region. Then, the voxels with R2 or R1ρ below the respective lower threshold could be identified and their % area in kidney was quantified (Equations 45). With the above mean R2 and R1ρ and their respective averaged SD values across voxels observed for CR+OSOM regions of normal WT kidneys (N=16), the corresponding thresholds at the lower end for R2 and R1ρ (locking field 1000 Hz) were 21.16 and 16.05 Hz.

Figure 6. Comparison of R2 and R distributions in CR+OSOM regions of representative WT and fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys.

Figure 6.

(A) R2 distributions of individual WT and fibrotic kidneys indicated by gray and red color respectively. Green dashed lines indicate lower and upper R2 thresholds at 21.15 and 31.47 Hz. (B) R1ρ distributions of individual WT and fibrotic kidneys indicated by gray and red color respectively. Green dashed lines indicate lower and upper R1ρ thresholds at 16.05 and 24.54 Hz. The double-headed arrows in R2 and R1ρ (locking frequency at 1000 Hz) maps indicate CR+OSOM regions. The green dashed lines in distribution plots indicate the normal range (Mean ± 1.96SD) of R2 and R1ρ for CR+OSOM regions in normal WT kidneys (N=16), and asterisks indicate outliers with R2 and R1ρ values smaller than their respective lower thresholds. The regional Mean and SD values of R2 and R1ρ across voxels in the CR+OSOM regions of the representative WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys are shown. The selected individual WT and fibrotic kidneys were from mice aged 33 weeks. F, fibrotic.

In WT kidney (Figure 6), the fractions of voxels below the respective R2 and R1ρ thresholds were low (tR2 and tR1ρ< 5.0%). However, in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney, the mean R2 and R1ρ of CR+OSOM region shifted lower (Figure 6), and they were distributed over a broader range of values than those of normal WT kidney (Figure 6), and the probabilities of pixels having values below their respective thresholds were increased. The percentages of the voxels that were below the R2 and R1ρ thresholds of CR+OSOM regions (tR2 and tR1ρ) in this individual fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney were 12.63% and 17.58% respectively. For the detected positive fibrosis areas in this selected fibrotic kidney, their averaged R2 and R1ρ (mR2 and mR1ρ) were also quantified, with 15.70 and 11.13 Hz for mR2 and mR1ρ (locking field 1000 Hz) respectively. These measures narrowed down the positive fibrotic areas, which mitigates against any partial volume effects from adjacent normal tissues in the CR+OSOM regions.

3.5 |. Comparison of regional R dispersions of normal and fibrotic kidneys

At 7T all kidneys showed considerable dispersion in R1ρ with locking field, with rate values deceasing about 25% over the range 200 – 3000 Hz in CR+OSOM regions (Supporting Information Figure S4 and Figure 7A). R1ρ dispersion curves showed different patterns for CR+OSOM regions in normal and fibrotic kidneys at different stages, with lower R1ρ observed in fibrotic kidneys than in normal kidneys (Figure 7A). Based on the differences between dispersion curves of CR+OSOM regions in normal and fibrotic kidneys at different stages (ΔR1ρ), the maximum of ΔR1ρ in the early stage (week 7) occurred around a locking frequency 1500 Hz, and this shifted to lower locking frequencies as fibrosis became more severe (Figure 7B). R1ρ dispersion curves for tR1ρ -detected positive fibrosis areas (Figure 7C) showed lower R1ρ than the respective value of CR+OSOM (Figure 7A) at each locking frequency at different fibrosis stage. The locking frequency for the maximal ΔR1ρ of positive fibrosis areas was lower than respective value of CR+OSOM regions, especially for the early and middle fibrosis stages (Figure 7B&D). The tR1ρ-based regional dispersion analysis reduced partial volume affects from adjacent normal tissues. The locking frequencies for the maximal ΔR1ρ of detected abnormal areas were around 1000 Hz at different stages (Figure 7D), which suggests the optimum locking frequency in spin-lock imaging for detecting fibrosis at 7T.

Figure 7. Comparison of representative regional R dispersions.

Figure 7.

(A) R1ρ dispersions of CR+OSOM regions in normal kidney at week 33 and fibrotic kidneys showing progressive fibrosis at week 7, 12 and 33. The markers indicate the raw R1ρ values at different locking frequencies and the dashed lines show the fitting curves using Chopra model. (B) Difference in R1ρ dispersions of CR+OSOM regions between WT kidney and fibrotic kidney at different stage. (C) R1ρ dispersions of tR1ρ-detected (locking frequency 1000 Hz) positive fibrosis areas in the respective fibrotic kidneys. The markers indicate the raw R1ρ values at different locking frequencies and the dashed lines show the fitting curves using Chopra model. (D) Difference in R1ρ dispersions between normal tissues in WT kidney and tR1ρ-detected fibrosis tissues in fibrotic kidney at different stage.

From the fitting of R1ρ dispersion of detected abnormal regions using the Chopra model (Figure 7C), R2fit, R1ρ, and Sρ were quantified (Equation 1) and the inflection frequency ωinfl was obtained thereafter (Equation 3). Group comparisons between the derived values of abnormal tissues in fibrotic kidneys at different ages and respective values of normal tissues in WT kidneys are shown in Figure 8A. Except R1ρ, the derived R2fit , Sρ and ωinfl all showed significant decreases in fibrotic kidneys. R2fit values clearly dropped as fibrosis progressed (Figure 8), but the exchange parameter Sρ and the inflection frequencies ωinfl changed by much larger factors (>50%). Supporting Information Figure S5 summarizes the values of the derived parameters of CR+OSOM regions for comparison. While R2fit differences were not significant in early stage fibrosis in CR+OSOM region (Supporting Information Figure S5), Sρ and ωinfl showed greater sensitivity for detecting the differences between different fibrosis stages. In addition, progressively lower Sρ and ωinfl were also observed as fibrosis progressed when mice aged (Supporting Information Figure S5). There was less variation in the asymptotic value of R1ρ between the groups. Please note that R1ρ derived from dispersion 200–3000 Hz can be very different from R1 relaxation rate, because additional dispersion for chemicals with fast chemical exchange pools (such as uracil) may occur beyond locking frequency 3000 Hz.

Figure 8. Group comparison of histological fibrosis index and MRI parameters from positive fibrosis areas.

Figure 8.

(A) Comparison of MRI measures of normal tissues of WT kidneys and fibrotic tissues in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys detected by tR1ρ-based analysis (locking frequency 1000 Hz). In all the boxplots, middle lines and circles indicate median and mean values across subjects respectively. Crosses indicate outliers in each group. N=16, N=12, N=16, and N=16 for normal WT, fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg at ages 5–7 weeks (F5–7W), 11–13 weeks (F11–13W), and 30–40 weeks (F30–40W), respectively. (B) Comparison of histologic fibrosis index by positive picrosirius red (%) and tR2 and tR1ρ (locking frequency 1000 Hz) detected fibrosis areas. N=12, N=8, N=8, and N=8 for normal WT, fibrotic hHB-EGFTg/Tg at ages 5–7 weeks (F5–7W), 11–13 weeks (F11–13W), and 30–40 weeks (F30–40W), respectively. Characteristic map with tR2 or tR1ρ detected fibrosis areas overlaid on spin-lock anatomical image was shown as an insert. Significant parametric differences between models are indicated by p values. *p<0.05, **p<10−3, ***p<10−4, ****p<10−8, *****p<10−12 vs. relative measures of WT.

3.6 |. MRI measures from threshold analyses and histologic fibrosis indices

Group comparisons between MRI measures of positive fibrosis areas in fibrotic kidneys and respective values of normal tissues in WT kidneys are shown in Figure 8. Among all the measures, the mR2 and mR1ρ of fibrotic tissues showed most significant decreases compared to respective normal tissues, while Sρ and ωinfl decreased by the largest factor. It is of note that comparisons between derived measures of CR+OSOM regions, with fibrotic measures including both normal and abnormal tissues, can significantly underestimate the differences between groups (Figure 8 and Supporting Information Figures S2 and S5). We also compared the changes of tR2- and tR1ρ-detected fibrotic areas (%) with histological fibrosis indices between WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys at different stages of progress (Figure 8B). Twelve WT and eight hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys with both MRI and histological results were included in the comparison. The tR2 and tR1ρ increased drastically in fibrotic kidneys, validated by the histologic fibrosis index. The MRI detected fibrotic areas (%) were comparable to those detected by picrosirius red stains (Figure 8B), even though the estimated mean and SD values of tR2 and tR1ρ for normal WT (Mean ± SD: 2.988% ± 2.711% and 1.686% ± 0.898%) were larger than those from histological indices (Mean ± SD: 0.257% ± 0.134%) across subjects. Parameters tR2 and tR1ρ showed gradual changes as fibrosis progressed from week 5–7 to week 11–13, and to week 30–40. The tR2- and tR1ρ-detected fibrotic areas (%) were highly correlated with the histological fibrosis index measured with picrosirius red stains (r = 0.804 and 0.880, p < 0.05) across WT and hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidneys.

ROC comparisons of these parameters are shown in Table 1. Histological fibrosis indices consistently showed highest sensitivity and specificity in detecting fibrosis at different stages (Table 1). The tR1ρ at locking frequency 1000 Hz showed a larger AROC than tR2, with sensitivity and specificity more comparable to histological fibrosis indices. The mR2 and mR1ρ always showed highest AROC in detecting the differences between normal and fibrotic tissues at different stages. Among all parameters from the Chopra modeling, Sρ and ωinfl showed the largest AROC in detecting differences between normal and fibrotic tissues at different stages, while R1ρ showed the lowest AROC. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI measures for detected abnormal tissues (Table 1) were much higher than those for CR+OSOM regions (Supporting Information Figure S3 and Tables S12).

Table 1.

ROC results of selected MRI measures and histological fibrosis indexa

Parameters Thresholdb Sensitivityb Specificityb AROC
F5–7W tR2 4.55 % 0.58 0.82 0.71
tR1ρ (1000Hz) 3.41 % 0.83 1.00 0.97
mR2 22.79 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
mR1ρ (1000Hz) 17.02 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
R2fit 19.93 Hz 0.92 0.92 0.93
R1ρ 15.02 Hz 0.58 1.00 0.72
Sρ 1356.49 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
ωinfl 783.00 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
HFI 0.84 % 1.00 1.00 1.00
F11–13W tR2 6.74 % 0.92 0.91 0.93
tR1ρ (1000Hz) 5.72 % 1.00 1.00 1.00
mR2 22.18 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
mR1ρ (1000Hz) 16.68 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
R2fit 20.08 Hz 0.92 0.92 0.95
R1ρ 13.40 Hz 0.75 1.00 0.81
Sρ 1322.36 Hz 1.00 0.92 0.99
ωinfl 763.50 Hz 1.00 0.92 0.99
HFI 4.46 % 1.00 1.00 1.00
F30–40W tR2 5.58 % 0.92 0.91 0.97
tR1ρ (1000Hz) 5.96 % 1.00 1.00 1.00
mR2 22.32 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
mR1ρ (1000Hz) 16.58 Hz 1.00 1.00 1.00
R2fit 19.57 Hz 0.92 1.00 0.99
R1ρ 13.05 Hz 0.75 0.83 0.78
Sρ 1227.58 Hz 1.00 0.92 0.97
ωinfl 708.78 Hz 1.00 0.92 0.97
HFI 9.39 % 1.00 1.00 1.00
a

Comparisons between positive fibrotic tissues detected in hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice and normal tissues in the CR+OSOM regions of WT mice. Histological fibrosis index (HFI) was measured based on positive picrosirius red (%). AROC, area under ROC curve.

b

Threshold for each parameter shows the optimum value that maximizes the sensitivity and specificity, collocated in the nearest point to (0, 1).

4 |. DISCUSSION

Measures obtained from spin-lock R1ρ dispersion imaging are sensitive to alterations in chemical compositions and the physico-chemical environment in tissue during fibrosis in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney. This study demonstrates that in vivo spin-lock imaging may be useful for assessing renal fibrosis in progressive kidney disease.

4.1 |. MRI parameters and their regional differences in kidney

Our results showed significant regional differences in R2 and R1ρ among cortex, OSOM, ISOM and IM+P in WT kidneys (Figure 3). R2 and R1ρ can be sensitive to free water content and capillary density. Low R2 and R1ρ could result from decreased capillary density and/or increased free water. Relaxation rates are usually highly correlated with concentrations of macromolecules such as proteins. Both R2 and R1ρ decreased from cortex to IM+P (Figure 3), and the regional trend could be associated with a decrease of microvascular density from the cortex to IM+P. The regional differences in R2 and R1ρ in kidneys could also be related to variations in free water contents and tubular density in each renal compartment (CR+OSOM < ISOM < IM+P) (20). These observations are consistent with regional kidney structures and functions, including glomerular filtration and tubular absorption in the cortex and urine concentration in the medulla.

4.2 |. Sensitivity of spin-lock measures to renal fibrosis

Different MRI measures showed different sensitivities to changes caused by renal fibrosis. The locking frequencies for maximal ΔR1ρ of detected fibrotic areas were observed around 1000 Hz at different fibrosis stages (Figure 7D), and R1ρ with locking frequency 1000 Hz consistently showed large AROC and high combined sensitivity and specificity for detecting fibrosis at different stages (Supporting Information Figure S3 and Table S1). These observations indicate that the optimum spin-lock frequency for detecting renal fibrosis at 7T is about 1000 Hz. In this hHB-EGFTg/Tg model, renal fibrosis develops by 6 weeks of age and its level progressively increases as the mice age.(35) Threshold analysis improves the sensitivity of each measure for detecting fibrotic areas compared to the respective regional measures of CR+OSOM (Table 1 and Supporting Information Tables S12). The hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice at 5–7 weeks showed significant increments in tR2- and tR1ρ-detected regions as compared to WT mice (Figure 8). Spin-lock MRI detected fibrosis in OSOM, and similar results were observed by histology (Figures 1 and 8). The measures of tR2 and tR1ρ could be used to detect mild structural changes in earlier stages of fibrosis.

It is well known that R1ρ at a single spin-lock power is confounded by many factors, whereas R1ρ dispersion provides a more specific measure of exchange effects by separating relaxation rates, exchange rates and frequency offsets of exchanging pools. Previous works have demonstrated that both R2 and R1ρ could be very sensitive to fibrosis in organs,(3234) but it is not clear whether R1ρ measurements at one single spin-lock power has any advantage over R2. R1ρ at an optimum spin-lock amplitude showed higher sensitivity and specificity than R2 in detecting fibrosis in hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice (Supporting Information Figure S3 and Table S1). Our data demonstrate that the area exhibiting abnormally low R2, R1ρ, Sρ and ωinfl values is related to regional histological fibrosis in the OSOM of hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney, suggesting these measures could be used for detecting and quantifying renal fibrosis in kidney diseases.

4.3 |. Challenges in spin-lock imaging of murine renal fibrosis

The parameters R2fit, R1ρ, Sρ and ωinfl from R1ρ dispersion showed wide ranges for normal WT kidneys (Figure 8). In addition to renal structure and function, the R1ρ dispersion is highly sensitive to the chemical components, including metabolites having exchanging groups such as glucose, creatinine and uracil, etc. Therefore, parameters from R1ρ dispersion could be very sensitive to physiological conditions, anesthesia level and metabolism during in vivo imaging. Restriction on food and drink before imaging and stabilization of physiological conditions and anesthesia level during imaging may help reduce the variabilities of these MRI measures for normal tissues and improve their sensitivity to abnormal change. Successful spin-lock mapping was restricted to a prescribed homogeneous B1 and Bo region. More advanced spin-lock sequences with additional phase shifts and 180° refocusing pulses can minimize artifacts arising from the B1 and Bo inhomogeneities but were not needed for small mouse imaging. High-resolution imaging is critical for the detection of scattered macromolecular accumulations (fibrosis) in small mouse kidneys. Even though high SNR offered at high fields permits relatively high spatial resolution for spin-lock imaging (SNR is ~100 for resolution 0.25×0.25×1 mm3), MRI measures may be still affected by partial volume averaging in small mouse kidneys. Variations of R2 and R1ρ in each voxel could reflect the net effect of pathological changes. Tubular dilation/urine retention, tubular atrophy, inflammation, increase of extracellular space, and decrease in capillary density could all reduce R2 and R1ρ in a voxel, while collagen deposition, cell infiltration and formation of myofibroblasts may show opposite effects. If the resolution is not high enough, the changes of R2 and R1ρ in each voxel could underestimate or overestimate renal fibrosis. Thus, it is critical to apply high-resolution spin-lock MRI for assessing the extent of fibrosis in kidney disease. Overall, measures from positive fibrosis areas showed higher sensitivity than respective measures of CR+OSOM regions in detecting renal fibrosis in this model, indicating that threshold analysis may reduce the influence from confounding factors.

4.4 |. Comprehensive and specific measures for assessing multiple features and parallel events during renal fibrosis

Multiple pathologic features present during the progression of fibrosis in kidney diseases.(3) Different kidney diseases such as renal artery stenosis,(18) nephrosclerosis (40) and obstructive kidney disease,(41) can show different characteristics in fibrosis.(20) In addition to deposition of rigid macromolecules and increased matrix cross-linking, progressive capillary loss, reduced microvascular blood flow and diminished oxygen delivery are also common during renal fibrosis.(3) Other parallel events, including inflammation, apoptosis, tubular dilation and polyuria may also accompany fibrosis in kidney disease.(9,3739,42) Histology detected extensive fibrosis in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg mice, in which collagen deposition and capillary density reduction were observed in the fibrotic regions of kidneys.(35) The tubular dilation or polyuria in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg model is not evident. Thus, the decreases of R2 and/or R1ρ in the detected positive fibrosis areas in the hHB-EGFTg/Tg model could be mainly due to events highly specific to fibrosis, such as increase of tubulointerstitial space and matrix, deposition of collagen, increased matrix cross-linking, and capillary loss. However, in a UUO model, advanced, parallel and sequential events such as tubular dilation and polyuria, tubular atrophy, decreases in blood flow and blood volume, could also cause R2 and/or R1ρ decrease.(32,33,37,38) Even though R2 and/or R1ρ decreased drastically in the cortical regions of UUO kidneys, fibrosis was very mild.(32,33,37,38) Thus, although R2 and R1ρ could be correlated with renal fibrosis in the cortex of UUO kidneys, they are not specific enough to renal fibrosis alone. On the other hand, R1ρ dispersion, rather than single measurements of relaxation rates, can provide additional information on exchanging and/or diffusion to study fibrosis. Measures obtained from spin-lock R1ρ dispersion imaging are sensitive to alterations in chemical compositions during fibrosis in hHB-EGFTg/Tg kidney. Both Sρ and the inflection frequency depend primarily on the exchange rate between water and other chemically shifted resonances such as hydroxyls, amines and amides.(36) This average exchange rate is sensitive to changes in pH and other physico-chemical aspects of the tissue microenvironment such as increases in fractions of proteins with slower exchanging or smaller chemically shifted protons. Collagen accumulation and cross-linking are the characteristic features when fibrosis occurs. The slow exchange rates ksw of hydroxyl protons in collagen due to crosslink and their small RF offsets Δωs (150–300 Hz at 7T) lower down the averaged Sρ values observed for fibrotic tissues. In addition, R1ρ dispersion in the range of lower spin-locking powers (locking frequency 0–200 Hz) may provide measurements to quantify aspects of diffusive and intrinsic susceptibility variations in inhomogeneous biological tissues, caused by changes of vessel density and oxygen saturation level during fibrosis progression.(28,29)

5 |. CONCLUSIONS

Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis in kidneys can be assessed by spin-lock MRI and measures obtained from R1ρ dispersion. This technique provides exchange rate information in addition to relaxation rates, which may be used as a novel imaging approach to assess chronic renal diseases.

Supplementary Material

Supp info

Table S1. ROC results of R2 and R1ρ measures of CR+OSOM regions.

Table S2. ROC results of parameters from Chopra modeling of CR+OSOM regions.

Figure S1. In vivo spin-lock imaging of murine kidneys.

Figure S2. Group comparison of MRI measures of CR+OSOM regions across normal and fibrotic kidneys at different fibrosis stages.

Figure S3. Comparison of ROC curves for selected MRI measures of CR+OSOM regions.

Figure S4. Comparison of representative R1ρ maps with different locking frequencies at different fibrotic stages.

Figure S5. Group comparison of MRI parameters of CR+OSOM regions from Chopra modeling.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Mr. Fuxue Xin, Mr. Ken Wilkens, Mr. Jarrod True, and Dr. Mark D. Does in the Center for Small Animal Imaging at Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants EB024525 and DK114809. This work was also supported by grant 1S10OD019993-01 for the Advance III HD Console, housed in the Vanderbilt Center for Small Animal Imaging.

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rockey DC, Bell PD, Hill JA. Fibrosis - A common pathway to organ injury and failure. New Engl J Med 2015;372(12):1138–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wynn TA. Common and unique mechanisms regulate fibrosis in various fibroproliferative diseases. J Clin Invest 2007;117(3):524–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leung G, Kirpalani A, Szeto SG, Deeb M, Foltz W, Simmons CA, Yuen DA. Could MRI be used to image kidney fibrosis? A review of recent advances and remaining barriers. Clin J Am Soc Nephro 2017;12(6):1019–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Retnakaran R, Cull CA, Thorne KI, Adler AI, Holman RR. Risk factors for renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: U.K. prospective diabetes study 74. Diabetes 2006;55(6):1832–1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brosius FC, Saran R. Do we now have a prognostic biomarker for progressive diabetic nephropathy? J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23(3):376–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michaely HJ, Sourbron S, Dietrich O, Attenberger U, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Functional renal MR imaging: an overview. Abdom Imaging 2007;32(6):758–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Niendorf T, Pohlmann A, Arakelyan K, Flemming B, Cantow K, Hentschel J, Grosenick D, Ladwig M, Reimann H, Klix S, Waiczies S, Seeliger E. How bold is blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney? Opportunities, challenges and future directions. Acta Physiol 2015;213(1):19–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takahashi T, Wang F, Quarles CC. Current MRI techniques for the assessment of renal disease. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 2015;24(3):217–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang F, Jiang R, Takahashi K, Gore J, Harris RC, Takahashi T, Quarles CC. Longitudinal assessment of mouse renal injury using high-resolution anatomic and magnetization transfer MR imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging 2014;32(9):1125–1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Togao O, Doi S, Kuro-o M, Masaki T, Yorioka N, Takahashi M. Assessment of renal fibrosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: study with murine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Radiology 2010;255(3):772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang F, Kopylov D, Zu Z, Takahashi K, Wang S, Quarles CC, Gore JC, Harris RC, Takahashi T. Mapping murine diabetic kidney disease using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med 2016;75(4):1685–1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Inoue T, Kozawa E, Okada H, Inukai K, Watanabe S, Kikuta T, Watanabe Y, Takenaka T, Katayama S, Tanaka J, Suzuki H. Noninvasive evaluation of kidney hypoxia and fibrosis using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22(8):1429–1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhao J, Wang ZJ, Liu M, Zhu J, Zhang X, Zhang T, Li S, Li Y. Assessment of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease using diffusion-weighted MRI. Clin Radiol 2014;69(11):1117–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feng Q, Ma Z, Wu J, Fang W. DTI for the assessment of disease stage in patients with glomerulonephritis - correlation with renal histology. Eur Radiol 2015;25(1):92–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Korsmo MJ, Ebrahimi B, Eirin A, Woollard JR, Krier JD, Crane JA, Warner L, Glaser K, Grimm R, Ehman RL, Lerman LO. Magnetic resonance elastography noninvasively detects in vivo renal medullary fibrosis secondary to swine renal artery stenosis. Invest Radiol 2013;48(2):61–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Friedli I, Crowe LA, Berchtold L, Moll S, Hadaya K, de Perrot T, Vesin C, Martin PY, de Seigneux S, Vallee JP. New magnetic resonance imaging index for renal fibrosis assessment: a comparison between diffusion-weighted imaging and T1 mapping with histological validation. Sci Rep 2016;6:30088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang F, Katagiri D, Li K, Takahashi K, Wang S, Nagasaka S, Li H, Quarles CC, Zhang MZ, Shimizu A, Gore JC, Harris RC, Takahashi T. Assessment of renal fibrosis in murine diabetic nephropathy using quantitative magnetization transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(6):2655–2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiang K, Ferguson CM, Ebrahimi B, Tang H, Kline TL, Burningham TA, Mishra PK, Grande JP, Macura SI, Lerman LO. Noninvasive assessment of renal fibrosis with magnetization transfer MR imaging: validation and evaluation in murine renal artery stenosis. Radiology 2017;283(1):77–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kline TL, Irazabal MV, Ebrahimi B, Hopp K, Udoji KN, Warner JD, Korfiatis P, Mishra PK, Macura SI, Venkatesh SK, Lerman LO, Harris PC, Torres VE, King BF, Erickson BJ. Utilizing magnetization transfer imaging to investigate tissue remodeling in a murine model of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Magn Reson Med 2016;75(4):1466–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang F, Wang SW, Zhang YH, Li K, Harris RC, Gore JC, Zhang MZ. Noninvasive quantitative magnetization transfer MRI reveals tubulointerstitial fibrosis in murine kidney. NMR in biomedicine 2019;32(11):e4128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Renou JP, Alizon J, Dohri M, Robert H. Study of the water collagen system by NMR cross relaxation experiments. J Biochem Bioph Meth 1983;7(2):91–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Renou JP, Bonnet M, Bielicki G, Rochdi A, Gatellier P. NMR-study of collagen water interactions. Biopolymers 1994;34(12):1615–1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koenig SH, Brown RD. Determinants of proton relaxation rates in tissue. Magn Reson Med 1984;1(4):437–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhong JH, Gore JC, Armitage IM. Quantitative studies of hydrodynamic effects and cross-relaxation in protein solutions and tissues with proton and deuteron longitudinal relaxation-times. Magn Reson Med 1990;13(2):192203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davis DG, Perlman ME, London RE. Direct measurements of the dissociationrate constant for inhibitor-enzyme complexes via the T1rho and T2 (CPMG) Methods. J Magn Reson Ser B 1994;104(3):266–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Traore A, Foucat L, Renou JP. 1H NMR study of water dynamics in hydrated collagen: transverse relaxation-time and diffusion analysis. Biopolymers 2000;53(6):476–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bain AD. Chemical exchange in NMR. Prog Nucl Mag Res Sp 2003;43(3–4):63103. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spear JT, Gore JC. Effects of diffusion in magnetically inhomogeneous media on rotating frame spin-lattice relaxation. J Magn Reson 2014;249:80–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spear JT, Zu ZL, Gore JC. Dispersion of relaxation rates in the rotating frame under the action of spin-locking pulses and diffusion in inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(5):1906–1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cobb JG, Xie JP, Gore JC. Contributions of chemical exchange to T1rho dispersion in a tissue model. Magn Reson Med 2011;66(6):1563–1571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cobb JG, Xie JP, Gore JC. Contributions of chemical and diffusive exchange to T1rho dispersion. Magn Reson Med 2013;69(5):1357–1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang H, Yang QH, Yu TH, Chen XD, Huang JW, Tan C, Liang BL, Guo H. Comparison of T2, T1rho, and diffusion metrics in assessment of liver fibrosis in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;45(3):741–750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu GW, Liang W, Wu MX, Lai CY, Mei YJ, Li YF, Xu JM, Luo LP, Quan XY. Comparison of T1 mapping and T1rho values with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging to assess fibrosis in a rat model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Acad Radiol 2019;26(1):22–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang YXJ, Yuan J, Chu ESH, Go MYY, Huang H, Ahuja AT, Sung JJY, Yu J. T1rho MR imaging is sensitive to evaluate liver fibrosis: an experimental study in a rat biliary duct ligation model. Radiology 2011;259(3):712–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Overstreet JM, Wang YQ, Wang X, Niu AL, Gewin LS, Yao B, Harris RC, Zhang MZ. Selective activation of epidermal growth factor receptor in renal proximal tubule induces tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Faseb J 2017;31(10):4407–4421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chopra S, Mcclung RED, Jordan RB. Rotating-frame relaxation rates of solvent molecules in solutions of paramagnetic-ions undergoing solvent exchange. J Magn Reson 1984;59(3):361–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang F, Jiang RT, Tantawy MN, Borza DB, Takahashi K, Gore JC, Harris RC, Takahashi T, Quarles CC. Repeatability and sensitivity of high resolution blood volume mapping in mouse kidney disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(4):866–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang F, Takahashi K, Li H, Zu Z, Li K, Xu J, Harris RC, Takahashi T, Gore JC. Assessment of unilateral ureter obstruction with multi-parametric MRI. Magn Reson Med 2018;79(4):2216–2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tantawy MN, Jiang R, Wang F, Takahashi K, Peterson TE, Zemel D, Hao CM, Fujita H, Harris RC, Quarles CC, Takahashi T. Assessment of renal function in mice with unilateral ureteral obstruction using 99mTc-MAG3 dynamic scintigraphy. BMC Nephrol 2012;13:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meyrier A Nephrosclerosis: update on a centenarian. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015;30(11):1833–1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chevalier RL. Obstructive nephropathy: towards biomarker discovery and gene therapy. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2006;2(3):157–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Breyer MD, Bottinger E, Brosius FC, Coffman TM, Fogo A, Harris RC, Heilig CW, Sharma K. Diabetic nephropathy: of mice and men. Advances in chronic kidney disease 2005;12(2):128–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp info

Table S1. ROC results of R2 and R1ρ measures of CR+OSOM regions.

Table S2. ROC results of parameters from Chopra modeling of CR+OSOM regions.

Figure S1. In vivo spin-lock imaging of murine kidneys.

Figure S2. Group comparison of MRI measures of CR+OSOM regions across normal and fibrotic kidneys at different fibrosis stages.

Figure S3. Comparison of ROC curves for selected MRI measures of CR+OSOM regions.

Figure S4. Comparison of representative R1ρ maps with different locking frequencies at different fibrotic stages.

Figure S5. Group comparison of MRI parameters of CR+OSOM regions from Chopra modeling.

RESOURCES