Abstract
Fusarium Head Blight of wheat, caused by the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum, leads to devastating global food shortages and economic losses. While many studies have addressed the responses of both wheat and F. graminearum during their interaction, the possibility of fungal chemotropic sensing enabling pathogenicity remains unexplored. Based on recent findings linking the pheromone-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor Ste2 to host-directed chemotropism in Fusarium oxysporum, we investigated the role of the Ste2 receptor and its downstream signaling pathways in mediating chemotropism of F. graminearum. Interestingly, a chemotropic response of growing hyphae towards catalytically active Triticum aestivum ‘Roblin’ cultivar secreted peroxidases was detected, with deletion of STE2 in F. graminearum leading to loss of the observed response. At the same time, deletion of STE2 significantly decreased infection on germinating wheat coleoptiles, highlighting an association between Ste2, chemotropism and infection by F. graminearum. Further characterization revealed that the peroxidase-directed chemotropism is associated with stimulation of the fungal cell wall integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade. Altogether, this study demonstrates conservation of Ste2-mediated chemotropism by Fusarium species, and its important role in mediating pathogenicity.
Subject terms: Fungal pathogenesis, G protein-coupled receptors
Introduction
Filamentous fungi grow by extending their hyphal tips to form an extensive mycelial network, with the hyphal tips often serving as the first point of contact with a new environment. They respond to changes in their environment by directing hyphal growth towards or away from a range of chemical stimuli. Directed hyphal growth towards a chemical stimulus, known as chemotropism, occurs not only in response to nutrient sources and fungal mating factors secreted from opposite mating type cells, but also towards host organisms that the fungi colonize1–5. Host-directed chemotropism of fungi is predominantly mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)5–7, and generally leads to spatial proximity of the fungal cells with the host cells, enabling a direct physical interaction and a complex array of molecular responses that underlie the interaction between the two organisms.
GPCRs undergo ligand-mediated conformational changes to transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular signals. Classically, GPCR stimulation by its ligand leads to the dissociation of its associated heterotrimeric G-protein into α and βγ subunits, which then recruit and activate signalling cascades within the cell, ultimately effecting appropriate biological responses8. Originally, it was widely accepted that GPCRs exist exclusively in either an active or inactive conformation, where one GPCR is activated by one ligand resulting in G-protein-mediated signaling and one distinct biological outcome. However, research on G-protein-dependent versus independent signaling of GPCRs over the past two decades has demonstrated that these receptors can exist in multiple conformations depending on the nature of the bound ligand, with different conformations leading to activation of different signaling cascades and biological outcomes. This phenomenon has been termed ‘biased GPCR signaling’ (reviewed extensively9–11). While such research has largely been limited to mammalian systems, biased GPCR signaling has been observed in other phyla with the fungal pheromone receptor, Ste2p, in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae serving as canonical example12.
Ste2p, along with the Ste3p receptor, are pheromone sensing GPCRs in S. cerevisiae, encoded by the STE2 and STE3 genes. They are expressed on the surface of a- and α-type cells, and recognize α- and a-pheromones secreted by opposite mating type cells, respectively13–15. The pheromone receptors and peptides expressed in each cell type are dictated by specific alleles present at the mating-type (MAT) locus, MATα and MATa16. Although these loci are present in all fungi, the system is best characterized in S. cerevisiae. Classically, binding of α-pheromone peptide to Ste2p activates the pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascade consisting of Ste11p-Ste7p-Fus1p, leading to cell cycle arrest, shmoo formation and subsequently the formation of a diploid zygote13. However, multiple studies have suggested the existence of alternate functionalities for S. cerevisiae Ste2p (ScSte2p), specifically in the mating events that occur downstream of cell cycle arrest, which are influenced by factors such as pheromone gradients17–20 as well as localization of the ScSte2p receptor to the mating projection21. Furthermore, specific mutations in ligand-interacting residues of ScSte2p resulted in different effects on G-protein-mediated MAPK signaling and diploid zygote formation12,22,23. In contrast, much less is known about the counterparts of ScSte2p in multicellular fungi where the mating type of an organism is governed by more complex mechanisms, or where mating is not relevant to the fungal life cycle.
Within the Fusarium genus, there exists a diversity of homothallic (fungi that can fertilize themselves to undergo sexual reproduction e.g. Fusarium graminearum), heterothallic (fungi that require a compatible partner to undergo sexual reproduction e.g. Fusarium fujikuroi) and even asexual (e.g. Fusarium oxysporum) species, raising the possibility of diverse roles that both pheromones and their receptors may play in fungal biology. Recently, F. oxysporum, a fungal pathogen that causes vascular wilt on many plants including tomatoes24, was found to use the Ste2 (FoSte2) receptor to mediate chemotropism towards the tomato plant roots that it colonizes5. This chemotropic growth was shown to be in response to the catalytic product of a tomato root-secreted peroxidase. Rather than activating the pheromone response MAPK signaling pathway, this FoSte2-mediated response was found to be transduced through the cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway, consisting of FoBck1-FoMkk2-FoMpk1, an alternate MAPK signaling pathway in fungi. Furthermore, both FoSte2 and FoSte3 have been shown to regulate conidial germination through autocrine pheromone signaling in F. oxysporum25. However, whether these alternate functionalities for Ste2 hold true more generally in higher fungi remains to be determined.
Fusarium graminearum causes Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) in wheat and other cereal crops, resulting in reduced grain quality and contamination with fungal mycotoxins, leading to severe economic and crop losses worldwide26. While the infection biology of the airborne F. graminearum has been extensively studied and displays notable differences from that of the soilborne F. oxysporum, knowledge regarding F. graminearum chemo-sensing and any role it may play in initiation of its infection is lacking.
In addressing this gap, it is important to note that despite its homothallic nature, Ste2 and its respective pheromone remain encoded in the F. graminearum genome27 (FgSTE2). Furthermore, F. graminearum also encodes an ortholog to the F. oxysporum CWI signalling pathway MAPK protein (FgMgv1; orthologous to FoMpk1 in F. oxysporum), as well as two other MAPKs, FgGpmk1 and FgHog1. Interestingly, while these MAPKs are primarily associated with cell wall integrity and remodelling28, pathogenicity and invasion29,30, and osmotic stress response31, respectively, all three have been implicated in pathogenicity (reviewed by di Pietro et al.32). On this basis, wild type and a STE2 deletion mutant of F. graminearum (Fgste2Δ) were comparatively tested for their chemotropic responses to a panel of nutrients, metabolites and peroxidases, as well as for their pathogenicity. The FgSte2 receptor was found to be essential for sensing a wheat peroxidase-derived chemoattractant and its deletion significantly reduced the pathogenicity of F. graminearum on germinating wheat coleoptiles. Observed activities were subsequently linked to phosphorylation of the MAPK FgMgv1, but not FgGpmk1. Together these findings emphasize the conserved nature of the mechanisms underlying host-mediated chemotropism among Fusarium species.
Results
Fusarium graminearum exhibits chemotropism towards chemical stimuli
A quantitative chemotropism assay5 was used to assess the abilities of different compounds to induce directional hyphal growth in F. graminearum (Supplemental Figure S1a). Cell concentrations of 0.25 million macroconidia per mL of aqueous agar media were found to be the most suitable for quantifying hyphae. Higher cell concentrations resulted in intertwining hyphae that could not be counted discreetly, while concentrations lower than 0.25 million per mL yielded insufficient numbers of cells on the scoring line. Growth of conidia exposed to gradients of various compounds was monitored microscopically and an optimum period of 14 h was chosen for counting hyphae. For consistency, only conidia with single hypha were included; those with more than one germinating hypha were excluded from the count.
Nutrients with nitrogen and/or carbon sources were screened first for their ability to induce chemotropism in wild type F. graminearum (Fig. 1a). The chemotropic responses to nutrients were compared with a double-negative control plate where water was added to both the test and control wells. Among nutrients, a significant chemotropic response was induced by methionine where ~ 10% more macroconidia grew hyphae towards methionine compared to the water control (Fig. 1a, Supplemental Figure S1b). Responses towards other nutrients were highly variable, and none of them elicited a response as robust or significant as methionine. Interestingly, it was observed that exposure of wild type macroconidia to any of the nitrogen-containing compounds, including glutamate, aspartate, ammonium sulfate and betaine, caused rapid hyphal growth yielding long, intertwined hyphae, compared to exposure to other nutrients. Nonetheless, with the exception of methionine, this rapid growth was not found to be significantly directional and thus was not deemed chemotropic in its nature.
With FgSte2 being an α-pheromone receptor, it was expected that exposure of F. graminearum to the α-pheromone would stimulate signaling through the receptor and ultimately a chemotropic response towards it. Hence, chemically synthesized α-pheromone peptides of S. cerevisiae and F. graminearum were next screened against wild type F. graminearum macroconidia (Fig. 1b). The two α-pheromone peptides are of similar size, but differ in sequence and thus, specificity. Exposure to Fg α-pheromone (Supplemental Figure S1c) stimulated a robust chemotropic response compared to the double-negative water control, while Sc α-pheromone induced a weaker and more variable response. To validate that it is the α-pheromone peptide that elicits directional growth, the F. graminearum α-pheromone was proteolyzed with proteinase K, resulting in a complete loss of chemotropism (Fig. 1b).
Fusarium graminearum exhibits positive chemotropism toward the wheat head and secreted wheat peroxidases
Macroconidia of F. graminearum are dispersed onto the wheat head prior to initiation of infection, implying that any wheat-derived chemoattractant inducing chemotropism would likely originate from the wheat head. This provided a rationale for investigating the wheat head alone in inducing directional hyphal growth in wild type F. graminearum. Preliminary chemotropism assays using wheat heads of cultivars having different susceptibilities towards F. graminearum, including the highly susceptible ‘Roblin’, moderately resistant ‘Wuhan’, and highly resistant ‘Sumai3’ cultivars, were conducted (Supplemental Figure S2a). While each of the wheat heads elicited chemotropic responses in wild type F. graminearum, these preliminary studies do not suggest any correlation between susceptibility and the intensity of the chemotropic response (Supplemental Figure S2b). Experiments were subsequently limited to the most susceptible cultivar ‘Roblin’. To facilitate further investigation into the nature of the host molecules that induce this response, exudate from the spikelets of ‘Roblin’ was extracted and tested for chemotropic effect. The response to ‘Roblin’ exudate (Supplemental Figure S1d) was similar to that seen for the intact ‘Roblin’ wheat head (Fig. 2a), confirming that the ‘chemoattractant’ is likely a water-soluble molecule derived from the wheat head. A concentration-dependent chemotropic response was seen towards ‘Roblin’ exudate, with a more concentrated exudate inducing a stronger chemotropic response in F. graminearum (Supplemental Figure S2c).
Toward identification of potential chemoattractant proteins, ‘Roblin’ exudate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2b). Mass spectrometric peptide fingerprinting of two bands (labeled 1 and 2) identified a variety of proteins including four wheat peroxidases, with NCBI protein IDs SPT21090, CDM85516, SPT21091, and SPT16353, corresponding to the expected molecular weights of these accessions, 35.5, 36.8, 38.2 and 41.0 kDa, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3a). Moreover, transcriptomic analysis of wheat infected with F. graminearum (NCBI SRA sample BioSample accession SAMN04386757)33 shows an upregulation of three of these four wheat peroxidases; SPT21090 (fourfold, padj = 2.07 × 10–9), CDM85516 (2.5-fold, padj = 6.15 × 10–3), and SPT21091 (fourfold, padj = 2.07 × 10–9). To confirm that the detected secreted peroxidases are functional, catalytic activity of the ‘Roblin’ exudate was tested against a well-known peroxidase substrate, pyrogallol, in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, and compared with commercially available horse radish peroxidase (HRP) (Supplemental Figure S3b, S3c). The ‘Roblin’ exudate exhibited robust catalytic activity in the pyrogallol assay.
The role of one or more of these peroxidases in eliciting chemoattraction was further examined by treatment of the ‘Roblin’ exudate with the peroxidase-specific inhibitor salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM), prior to assessing chemotropism (Fig. 2c). The observed elimination of any chemotropic response toward the SHAM-inhibited ‘Roblin’ exudate by F. graminearum validates the importance of active peroxidases secreted by the wheat head in this system.
While wheat peroxidases are valid candidates to contribute to the stimulation of chemotropism, HRP was tested in the chemotropism assay as a more reliable and simplified assay system. Conservation of essential catalytic residues between HRP and the identified wheat peroxidases provides a rationale for similar chemotropic responses of F. graminearum towards the two stimuli (Supplemental Figure S3a). As expected, exposure to HRP induced a robust chemotropic response in wild type F. graminearum (Fig. 2c, Supplemental Figure S1e). This HRP-induced chemotropism was completely abolished either by proteinase K treatment or by boiling at 100 °C. Inhibition of HRP with SHAM also eliminated the chemotropic response. These findings emphasize that the chemoattractant is not the peroxidase itself, but the product of a peroxidase-catalyzed reaction.
Finally, to confirm that this observed response was indeed chemotropism and not a growth speed or subjective bias, the lengths and angles of the hyphae growing towards test (HRP) and control (water) compounds in the chemotropism plate assay were measured (n = 300, Fig. 3a–c). This analysis showed no significant differences in the lengths, and thus no growth speed bias, of hyphae growing towards HRP compared to those growing towards the water control (Fig. 3b). To avoid subjective bias, only hyphae with angles of 0 to approximately 45° were counted and used for calculation of the chemotropic index. The angles of hyphae that were counted as growing towards the HRP and water control were measured (Fig. 3c) and a similar distribution of angles was observed for both HRP and the water control. No significant difference was observed between the cosine of angles of these hyphae with the average cosine of 0.87, corresponding to an angle of approximately 28° (Fig. 3c).
Deletion of F. graminearum STE2 results in loss of chemotropic response
To investigate the role of FgSte2 in chemotropism, the previously annotated STE2 gene27,34,35 was deleted through homologous recombination using ATMT. Three positive hygromycin-resistant transformants (Fgste2Δ-1, Fgste2Δ-3, Fgste2Δ-5) were further confirmed by PCR amplification across the upstream junction of integration of the knockout cassette with primers P13 (located in the upstream genomic DNA region outside of the knockout cassette) + P16 (within the hygromycin coding region) (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Figure S4a). Furthermore, PCR analysis with primers internal to the STE2 coding region (Primers P11 and P12—Supplemental Table 1) showed a complete absence of bands. To validate that any phenotypic and chemotropic changes observed are solely due to the deletion of STE2 and not any off-target genetic defects, a complement strain was constructed by re-introducing the STE2 gene into the Fgste2Δ-5 strain (Supplemental Figure S4b). The complemented geneticin-resistant strain was verified by PCR using geneticin-specific and genomic DNA-specific primers to amplify across the junction of the cassette. Sequencing of the genomic DNA showed that the complemented gene was integrated into the native STE2 locus.
The three Fgste2Δ strains and one Fgste2Δ + STE2 strain were assayed against compounds that elicited significant chemotropic responses in wild type F. graminearum, specifically Fg α-pheromone, ‘Roblin’ exudate, HRP and methionine. A chemotropic index of essentially zero was determined for Fg α-pheromone for the Fgste2Δ-5 mutant, indicating random hyphal growth and an inability to sense the pheromone peptide, confirming that deletion of FgSTE2 eliminates all chemotropic response to α-pheromone (Fig. 4a). Next, it was observed that the Fgste2Δ-5 mutant exhibited no chemotropism towards ‘Roblin’ exudate, signifying the FgSte2 receptor is responsible for mediating chemotropism towards the ‘Roblin’ exudate (Fig. 4a). The same result was observed upon exposure of the Fgste2Δ-5 mutant to a gradient of HRP. Interestingly, however, the Fgste2Δ-5 mutant exhibited a robust response towards methionine, comparable to that observed in wild type strain, indicating that the response to nutrients is mediated independently of the FgSte2 receptor. All three Fgste2Δ transformants exhibited similar chemotropic responses towards the compounds tested (Supplemental Figure S5). Re-introduction of STE2 into the Fgste2Δ-5 mutant restored chemotropic responses towards Fg α-pheromone, ‘Roblin’ exudate and HRP in F. graminearum, confirming the role of the FgSte2 receptor in sensing these stimuli (Fig. 4a).
Deletion of STE2 has no effect on vegetative growth on solid and liquid media
Vegetative growth of Fgste2Δ-5 and Fgste2Δ + STE2 strains were assessed on PDA and SNA plates (Fig. 4b). On both media, the growth, colony color, and morphology of Fgste2Δ-5 was comparable to wild type F. graminearum. Additionally, growth of all three Fgste2Δ mutants and Fgste2Δ + STE2 in liquid CMC and PDB media was found to be comparable to wild type. Interestingly, conidia of Fgste2Δ-5 mutants are significantly shorter than those of wild type (Fig. 4c,d).
Deletion of STE2 leads to decreased virulence on wheat coleoptiles
To assess whether FgSte2 plays a role in pathogenicity, the three Fgste2Δ mutants and the Fgste2Δ + STE2 complement strain were assessed in the coleoptile infection assay and compared to wild type F. graminearum. The coleoptile assay was selected as a pathosystem to study infection of wheat by F. graminearum as it represents a very fast and reliable method, that yields simple and easily quantifiable results. Past studies have shown this coleoptile assay to yield results comparable to wheat head infection assays36–38, validating the effectiveness of this assay as a means to assess infection of wheat by F. graminearum. Pathogenicity was quantified by measuring the extent of the lesion formed on the ‘Roblin’ coleoptile stalk after 10 days of incubation with F. graminearum conidia (Fig. 5a). Inoculation of coleoptiles with wild type F. graminearum resulted in dense mycelial growth originating from the wound site, as well as formation of a 5.3 ± 1.9 mm lesion on the stalk. Conversely, all three Fgste2Δ strains showed a significant decrease in the extent of infection of the coleoptile (Fig. 5b). As expected, reintroduction of a wild type copy of STE2 restored pathogenicity of F. graminearum (Fig. 5c).
Exposure of F. graminearum to peroxidase leads to CWI MAPK signaling
As Ste2-mediated stimuli has been shown to be transduced through MAPK signaling pathways, immunoblotting was used to monitor the phosphorylation of FgGpmk1 of the invasive growth MAPK pathway and FgMgv1 of the CWI MAPK pathway upon exposure to HRP (Fig. 6a). Untreated wild type F. graminearum exhibited a basal level of both phosphorylated Mgv1 and Gpmk1 (Fig. 6b). Exposure to HRP for 1 h resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in phosphorylation of FgMgv1 compared to the control (Fig. 6c), whereas no significant difference in FgGpmk1 phosphorylation was observed (Fig. 6d).
To further understand the signal transduction pathway initiated by FgSte2 activation, chemotropism was assessed for F. graminearum lacking selected genes involved in, and/or associated with, the CWI MAPK pathway. A deletion mutant of the MAPK in the CWI pathway, Fgmgv1Δ39 (kindly provided by Dr. Rajagopal Subramaniam), lacked all chemotropic response towards Fg α-pheromone (Fig. 7a), signifying that this pathway is involved in relaying the signal from pheromone-activated FgSte2. The Fgmgv1Δ mutant was also unable to sense and grow towards ‘Roblin’ exudate, or HRP, further supporting the fact that F. graminearum requires this pathway for sensing and mediating chemotropism towards the host. However, the Fgmgv1Δ strain retained the ability to sense and grow towards methionine, reiterating that the pathway responsible for chemotropism towards the host is separate from that involved in nutrient response.
A second MGV1 mutant strain of F. graminearum with constitutively overexpressed MGV1 (FgMGV1-OX) was generated and characterized (Supplemental Figure S6a, c). Despite the expression of FgMGV1 in this mutant being four times higher than wild type (Supplemental Figure S6b), the chemotropic responses observed in FgMGV1-OX towards Fg α-pheromone, ‘Roblin’ exudate, HRP, and methionine did not differ significantly from those observed in wild type F. graminearum (Fig. 7a).
Bmh1 and Bmh2 are 14-3-3 adaptor proteins known to associate with the CWI MAPK signaling pathways in S. cerevisiae40. Orthologues of these proteins in filamentous fungi have been implicated in a variety of processes, including cell cycle progression and cell growth41,42, germ tube development and growth43, and even repression of secondary metabolite production44,45. Single deletion mutants of these orthologous F. graminearum46 proteins, Fgbmh1Δ and Fgbmh2Δ, were tested in the chemotropism plate assay (Fig. 7b). When exposed to Fg α-pheromone, ‘Roblin’ exudate or HRP, no chemotropic responses were observed in either Fgbmh1Δ or Fgbmh2Δ (Fig. 7b). Lastly, both Fgbmh1Δ and Fgbmh2Δ retained robust, wild type-like responses to methionine.
Discussion
Since the first report of gene disruption in F. graminearum in 199547, several studies have been implemented to investigate the role of candidate virulence factors and other fungal genes involved in the interaction between F. graminearum and its cereal hosts. However, knowledge about the fungal cell surface receptors that sense and mediate chemotropic growth of F. graminearum has been lacking. The primary objective of this research was to understand the mechanisms underlying host sensing and chemotropism by F. graminearum.
Many of the nutrients tested in our study have previously been assessed in the context of growth stimulation and mycotoxin induction in F. graminearum, but not chemotropism. Unexpectedly, F. graminearum exhibited only weak and variable chemotropic responses towards the carbon sources tested, in contrast to the strong response that was observed in F. oxysporum toward glucose5. While glucose and galactose have been shown to stimulate growth in F. graminearum, they are not important for pathogenic traits such as mycotoxin synthesis48, consistent with the findings reported here that they do not serve as chemotropic stimuli. Among nitrogen-containing compounds, methionine induced the most robust chemotropic response, as well as extensive hyphal growth and branching in wild type F. graminearum. Methionine uptake has been demonstrated to be involved in the induction of trichothecene mycotoxins49. Although F. oxysporum did not respond to methionine5, other filamentous fungi such as Achlya bisexualis50,51 and Achlya ambisexualis52 exhibit methionine-driven chemotropism with similar hyphal branching patterns as observed for F. graminearum. In agreement with our observations, aspartate and glutamate have previously been shown to induce growth in F. graminearum49. Interestingly, previous work also identified wheat anthers53, and specifically choline and betaine, as selectively stimulating F. graminearum conidial growth in a plate assay54–57. The lack of chemotropic response towards betaine herein, suggest that while it is likely a growth stimulant of F. graminearum, it does not induce chemotropism.
For a long time, research on fungal G-protein-coupled receptors was largely limited to the Ste2p receptor of S. cerevisiae, which was used as a model system to study GPCR signaling and mating in yeast. Over the past two decades, pheromone receptors in other fungi, including filamentous fungi like F. graminearum27, were identified and their roles in mating or sexual reproduction characterized. Pheromone-induced Ste2- and Ste3-mediated chemotropism has been observed in S. cerevisiae and Neurospora crassa58, respectively, and both of these organisms rely on this process for mating and sexual reproduction. More recently, Ste2- and Ste3-mediated chemotropism towards α- and a-pheromone was demonstrated in F. oxysporum5,25. Furthermore, this pair of receptors has been shown to be involved in the regulation of autocrine pheromone signaling and conidial germination in F. oxysporum25. While the most obvious role for Ste2 in mating has been extensively studied in heterothallic organisms, its relevance in homothallic fungi such as F. graminearum remains enigmatic. Despite not needing a partner for sexual reproduction, F. graminearum can only undergo sexual reproduction when both Ste2 and Ste3 are co-expressed; deletion of either MAT gene results in an obligate heterothallic strain that can be outcrossed59. Our results highlight that even though F. graminearum does not need to mate to reproduce, the Ste2 receptor-driven chemotropism mechanism observed in other fungi is maintained in this species.
In addition to an α-pheromone response, FgSte2 also contributed to the detection of and mediation of chemotropism towards the activity of peroxidases from both wheat and horseradish. This demonstrates the ability of FgSte2 to recognize multiple ligands and reveals the conserved role of Ste2 in a second Fusarium species in host-sensing. Specifically, FgSte2 responds to the catalytic product of a class III peroxidase secreted from the wheat head. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and secreted peroxidases is a universally utilized strategy by plants to defend themselves against pathogens60–62. Indeed, wheat infected with F. graminearum 63,64 and other pathogens such as Puccinia triticina65 show increased expression of peroxidases up to 48 h after infection. Additionally, a previous study from our group33 showed a significant upregulation of three of the four wheat peroxidases identified in the ‘Roblin’ exudate in wheat infected with F. graminearum. Despite the higher amounts of peroxidase secreted by F. graminearum-infected wheat, the significantly lower extent of infection by the Fgste2Δ strains placed directly on the wound site emphasizes the importance of the FgSte2 receptor in pathogenicity.
F. graminearum encodes three MAPK proteins orthologous to those found in S. cerevisiae. These are FgMgv1, FgGpmk1 and FgHog1 with ascribed function in cell wall integrity and remodelling28, pathogenicity and invasion29,30, and osmotic stress response31, respectively. All three MAPKs have been implicated in pathogenicity in filamentous fungal pathogens (reviewed by di Pietro et al.32). The Ste2-mediated response to HRP was found to be governed by the cell wall integrity pathway, similar to that observed in F. oxysporum5. Consistent with this, selective deletion of FgMgv1 from F. graminearum completely abolished all chemotropism towards ‘Roblin’ exudate and HRP. Overexpression of FgMGV1 had no effect on chemotropic growth compared with wild type, likely due to the number of FgSte2 receptors involved in the detection of the stimuli remaining constant. Interestingly, a recent study by Jiang et al. found that wild type F. graminearum exhibits a two and a half-fold increase in phosphorylation of FgGpmk1 and negligible increase in phosphorylation of Mgv1 when treated with dissected flowering wheat spikelets66. The discrepancy between the aforementioned study and the findings presented here is likely related to methodological differences, where dissected tissues may have a loss of enzymatically activate peroxidases compared to the live plant. In the classical S. cerevisiae yeast model, stimulation of Ste2p by α-pheromone results in the recruitment and activation of the Fus3/Kss1 pheromone response MAPK signaling cascade13. ScSte2p activation by α-pheromone also leads its associated Gβγ recruiting Rho1, an effector of the CWI pathway, demonstrating evidence in yeast for ScSte2p-mediated recruitment of the CWI pathway67. It should be noted though, that ScSlt2p in S. cerevisiae (orthologue of FgMgv1) can be activated upon exposure to α-pheromone in the absence of its associated MAPKKK (ScBck1p), suggesting alternate mechanisms of CWI pathway activation in the presence of pheromone68. Yet another protein, the transmembrane sensor, FgSho1, in F. graminearum modulates signaling via both the CWI and invasive growth MAPK signaling pathways69. Our results show the existence of a similarly complex and intricate cross-communication between receptors and signaling pathways in F. graminearum.
Unlike root-colonizing fungi that exhibit chemotropism towards compounds diffusing through the soil, F. graminearum conidia are dispersed from overwintering crop debris onto the wheat head through various physical means and are thus already on the wheat head prior to initiation of chemotropism. Based on the findings presented herein, two mechanisms of peroxidase-stimulated chemotropism of F. graminearum are proposed. First, F. graminearum secretes cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDE) that would stimulate an increase in peroxidase secretion by the wheat to reinforce the cell wall at that site61,70. Higher concentrations of peroxidase-derived chemoattractant could increase the affinity or probability of F. graminearum invasion. Second, these aforementioned sites of increased peroxidase secretion would result in the release or diffusion of peroxidase-derived product and attract more distal conidia to invade at these same sites. This is supported by our finding that conidia of Fgste2Δ strain placed directly on a wound site displayed a significantly lower extent of infection when compared to the wild type strain. Elements involved in relaying the peroxidase-induced stimulus from FgSte2 have also been implicated in pathogenicity of wheat; deletion of FgMgv128 and FgBmh246 result in a significant reduction of pathogenicity. While FgBmh1 has been reported to be dispensible for F. graminearum infection of wheat46, it appears to be involved in mediating chemotropic response towards the wheat peroxidase-derived product. FgBmh1 and FgBmh2 have been shown to be involved in sensing nitrogen-containing compounds ammonium nitrate and sodium nitrate46, however, deletion of either protein does not affect the response of F. graminearum towards methionine, reiterating that methionine uptake occurs through a different mechanism.
Conventional methods of controlling F. graminearum include application of fungicides and use of more resistant wheat cultivars71. More recently, biological control agents72,73,small RNA interference74,75 and generation of cultivars overexpressing genes conferring F. graminearum resistance76–78 have emerged as potential methods of managing F. graminearum. In any case, existing disease management methods have their limitations71,79 and increasing fungicide resistance, limited FHB-resistant wheat cultivars and changing climate conditions are confounding factors in keeping FHB under control. Understanding the mechanism of infection by F. graminearum is essential and will potentially result in more specific targets for fungal inhibition to reduce the devastating consequences of this fungal disease.
Materials and methods
Fungal strains, culture conditions and maintenance
Fungal strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Macroconidia from all strains were obtained through cultures in liquid carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) medium80 at 28 °C with shaking at 170 rpm in the dark. Routine maintenance of strains was done on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates. Plugs of F. graminearum strains grown on SNA81 or conidial suspensions were stored long-term at − 80 °C in 15% glycerol. For macroconidia harvest, the liquid CMC cultures were filtered through four layers of sterilized cheesecloth and the filtrate was centrifuged at 3,400 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The macroconidia were washed in sterile water twice, resuspended in 1–3 mL of sterile water, and quantified with a hemocytometer.
Table 1.
Strain | Genotype | Gene function | References |
---|---|---|---|
GZ-3639 | Wild type | Dr. Susan McCormick (USDA) | |
Fgste2Δ | STE2::HPH | GPCR | This study |
Fgste2Δ + STE2 | STE2::HPH;STE2:GEN | GPCR | This study |
Fgmgv1Δ | MGV1::HPH | MAPK | Rampitsch et al.39 |
FgMGV1-OX | pGpdA::mgv1 | MAPK | This study |
Fgbmh1Δ | BMH1::HPH | 14-3-3 | Brauer et al.46 |
Fgbmh2Δ | BMH2::HPH | 14-3-3 | Brauer et al.46 |
Wheat growth conditions
Wheat cultivars ‘Roblin’, ‘Sumai3’ and ‘Wuhan’ were grown in an AC-60 growth chamber (Enconair) at the greenhouse facility in the Dept. of Biology at Queen’s University. Wheat seeds were kindly provided by Dr. Thérèse Ouellet (AAFC, Ottawa, Canada). Growth light and temperature conditions were 20 °C day, 16 °C night, with a 16 h photoperiod (750 µmol photons/m2 × s). Soil was made of 1:1:1 topsoil, sand, Pro-Mix. Fertilizer solution “20-20-20” at a concentration of 2 g/L was administered weekly.
Quantitative chemotropism plate assay
Chemotropism assays were performed as described previously5, with minor modifications. Briefly, fresh F. graminearum macroconidia were mixed with 0.5% (w/v) water agar to a final concentration of 2.5 × 105 spores per mL and plated in a Petri dish. A scoring line was drawn down the middle of the plate and two wells were made 5 mm away and parallel to the scoring line. Equal volumes (50 µL) of sterile water and test compound were pipetted into the control well and test well, respectively. Tested compounds were: 50% (v/v) methanol (MeOH), ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4), glucose (Gluc), glycerol (Glyc), galactose (Gal), all at 50 mM; methionine (Met), sodium aspartate (Asp), sodium glutamate (Glu), all at 295 mM; and 0.1 M betaine. Chemotropic response of F. graminearum towards wheat was tested for each of three cultivars. To measure chemotropism towards wheat, the flowering wheat head still attached to the live plant was placed directly into the test well containing sterile water (as shown in Supplemental Figure S2a). Plates were incubated for approximately 14 h at 22 °C in the dark. The number of germinating hyphae growing towards the test (Ntest) or control compound (Ncont) were counted under the Nikon SMZ1000 microscope and a chemotropic index was calculated as C.I. = . While only hyphae with angles of approximately 45° or less with respect to the direction of the gradient of test or control compounds were included in the count, no strict criteria for inclusion of hyphae based on length was used. For each compound, a minimum of 500 macroconidia per plate were counted. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analyses were conducted using Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA on GraphPad Prism version 6.
Commercially available horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was assayed at a concentration of 4 µM. To study the chemoattractive nature of HRP, the enzyme was inhibited by salicylhydroxamic acid (60 mM) (SHAM) for 5 min, heat-denatured at 95 °C for 10 min or proteolyzed by proteinase K (1 mg/mL) for 30 min at room temperature and then assayed. Synthetic F. graminearum (Fg) (WCTWKGQPCW) and S. cerevisiae (Sc) (WHWLQLKPGQPMY) α-pheromone peptides were synthesized. Pheromones were reconstituted in 50% (v/v) methanol in water and used in the chemotropism assay at a final concentration of 378 µM (final methanol concentration 2.5%). Fg α-pheromone was treated with proteinase K solution (1 mg/mL) for 30 min. The reaction was stopped with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and tested in the chemotropism assay.
For hyphal length and angle measurements, light microscopy images of chemotropism plates containing HRP as the test compound were taken on an Olympus SZX10 microscope fitted with a DP27 camera. Hyphal lengths and angles, with respect to the HRP gradient, of at least 300 germinating conidia were measured using ImageJ82. The experiment was performed twice. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student’s t-test.
‘Roblin’ exudate production and identification of associated wheat peroxidases
Two flowering ‘Roblin’ wheat heads still attached to the plant were submerged in 25 mL of sterile water and incubated for 48 h at room temperature. Exudate was concentrated either 200- or 300-fold using an Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (Millipore, cutoff 3 kDa) and stored at 4 °C until further usage in chemotropism or peroxidase activity assays and for protein sequencing. The exudates were assayed directly for peroxidase activity in 96-well plates at 22 °C as described previously83. The formation of the pyrogallol oxidation product (extinction coefficient, ε420, 4,400 M-1 cm-1) was measured spectrophotometrically at 420 nm.
Concentrated ‘Roblin’ exudate was run on a 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue. The resolved bands corresponding to proteins of molecular weight 34 and 37 kDa were cut out of the gel and sent to Mass Spectrometry Research, SPARC Biocentre, Hospital for Sick Children, where they were subjected to tryptic digestion. The peptide fragments were analyzed by LC–MS/MS and used to identify the proteins present in the corresponding bands. Data was analyzed using the Scaffold 4 software.
Fungal genomic DNA isolation
Mycelia were collected from two-day-old F. graminearum liquid cultures through filtration, and ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was then isolated from the ground tissue using the E.Z.N.A Fungal DNA Mini Kit and eluted in sterile water.
Construction of vectors
Vectors used for generating the various mutant strains were constructed using Uracil-Specific Excision Reagent (USER) technology84,85. All cloning, sequencing and screening primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
To construct the vector for generating the STE2 deletion mutant (Fgste2Δ), flanking regions of the STE2 gene, which constitute the homologous recombination sequences (HRS) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers P1-P4 from wild type F. graminearum gDNA using Pfu Cx Turbo Hotstart polymerase (Agilent Technologies). The amplified fragments were cloned into the pRF-HU2 vector85 flanking a hygromycin B phosphotransferase (HPH) gene using USER enzyme mix (NEB). Correct orientation of the inserts in the plasmid was confirmed through PCR and DNA sequencing (P5-P10).
The vector used to generate the STE2 complement (Fgste2Δ + STE2) was constructed by amplifying the STE2 gene, with 1 kb upstream and downstream flanking regions, using primers P17-P18 and cloned into the linearized pRF-GU vector upstream of the geneticin-resistance gene, aminoglycoside 3′phosphotransferase (GEN)85. The generated vector was verified by PCR (P11-P12 and P26-P27) and sequenced with primers P19-P25.
A similar method was employed in generating the MGV1 over-expression vector using the pRF-HU2E vector which is designed for in locus overexpression driven by the Aspergillus nidulans GAPDH promoter85, was used. In this case, primers P28-P31 were used to generate the expression cassette in pRF-HU2E.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT)
Vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by electroporation, and transformants were confirmed by PCR. The reagents and protocol required for ATMT were described by Frandsen86.
Correct integration of the knockout cassette and replacement of STE2 with HPH was confirmed by PCR amplification, across the upstream junction formed between the genomic DNA and knockout cassette following homologous recombination with primers P13-P16. Insertion of the complementation cassette was confirmed by PCR with primers P11-P12 and P26-P27. The site of integration of the complementation cassette was confirmed in a similar manner to that of the knockout strain using primers P26-P16 and sequencing of the region of cassette integration into the genomic DNA.
Correct insertion of the MGV1 overexpression cassette into F. graminearum was corroborated using the primers P32-P37 and the MGV1 sequence was confirmed through sequencing at the Genome Quebec service lab (Montréal, Québec, Canada). This was followed by confirmation of single copy in locus insertion of the MGV1 transgene by quantitative PCR (qPCR). gDNA was isolated from five-day-old F. graminearum mycelium culture on PDA plate using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAgen). qPCR was employed on the gDNA of the MGV1 overexpression strains (FgMGV1-OX) and the wild type strain to determine the copy number of MGV1 (amplified with primers P38-P39) and the housekeeping gene ß -TUBULIN (primers P40-P41) which served as a control. qPCR was carried out using PerfeCTa SYBR Green SuperMix Low ROX (Quantabio) on a Quant Studio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) as described previously87. Copy number estimation was calculated against the standard curve, which was generated using the MGV1 and ß-TUBULIN genes (previously amplified from the wild type gDNA).
The overexpression of MGV1 was verified through reverse-transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR). RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and qPCR were carried out as previously described87. The qPCR reaction was performed in 10 µL with PerfeCTa SYBR Green SuperMix Low ROX (Quantabio) and primers P38-P41. Three biological replicates with three technical replicates were included in each reaction along with the negative controls. Standard curve calculations were used to normalize the data to housekeeping genes and to estimate the relative expression of MGV1 in FgMGV1-OX compared to wild type using the QIAgen’s Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) (p < 0.05).
Coleoptile infection assay
Infection of germinating coleoptiles with the various STE2 mutants was carried out as previously described88. Briefly, 16 ‘Roblin’ seeds per strain to be tested were placed on ½ MS media in 0.7% (w/v) agar in water in autoclaved Magenta boxes and stratified overnight at 4 °C in the dark. The Magenta boxes were then placed in the growth chamber and coleoptiles were grown until at least 1 cm in height, where 12–16 seeds germinated per strain. Sterile scissors were used to cut 1 mm off the top of the coleoptile and a cotton soaked with macroconidial suspension (2 × 105 spores per mL) was wrapped around the wound site. The Magenta boxes were placed in the growth chambers to allow symptom development. After ten days, the length of coleoptile stalks infected were measured for each strain. The experiment was performed twice. Statistical analysis was conducted by one-way ANOVA.
Conidial length quantification
Conidia of wild type and STE2 mutants of F. graminearum were imaged using an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope fitted with a 20 × objective and an Andor Zyla 4.2 Plus camera controlled by the cellSens software. Two hundred conidia were measured per strain and conidial lengths were quantified using Image J. Statistical analysis was conducted by one-way ANOVA.
Immunoblotting of MAPKs
Approximately 105 spores of wild type F. graminearum were inoculated in 20 mL of liquid Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) and grown for 24 h at 28 °C in the dark. The growing culture was exposed to 0.05 µM HRP or water control for 1 h, and the cells were then lysed as previously described89 with some modifications. Briefly, the mycelia were collected by filtering the culture through Whatman filter paper, finely ground in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in 1 mL of protein extraction buffer (1 M NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol, protease inhibitor cocktail, and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysate was homogenized by vortexing and then centrifuged at 13,000 × g. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh microfuge tube and total protein concentration was quantified with Bradford assay90. Twenty micrograms of total protein of each sample were loaded and resolved on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane by wet electroblotting at 400 mA for 2 h. The membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% (w/v) non-fat dried skim milk in TBST (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20) at 4 °C. The membranes were subsequently incubated with either anti-p44/42 MAP kinase (1:1,000 dilution, M5670, Millipore Sigma) or anti-phospho p44/42 MAP kinase (1:1,000 dilution, CST #9101, Cell Signaling Technology) primary antibodies. The membranes were then incubated with anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (1:5,000 dilution, 7074S, Cell Signal Technology). Pierce Enhanced Chemiluminescent substrate was added to the membranes and the emitted light was captured on an x-ray film. The same membranes were then re-probed for α-tubulin (1:1000, sc53030, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as a loading control. Quantification was performed using ImageJ. The experiment was repeated three times with independent sets of samples and analyzed by Student’s t-test.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge E. Brauer and C. Bonner at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa for technical advice and training. The authors also acknowledge Youlian Pan (National Research Council of Canada, Digital Technologies Research Center, Ottawa, Canada) and Simon Foote (Human Health Therapeutics, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada) for transcriptomic analyses. This work was funded by Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council to both J.S.A. (# 356025–2019), and M.C.L (# 261683–2018) and by the National Research Council of Canada to M.C.L. This manuscript represents NRC Communication # 56467.
Author contributions
P.S.S. planned and carried out most of the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the first draft of the paper. D.T. planned and carried out some of the early chemotropism experiments, analyzed and interpreted some data and contributed to writing the first draft of the paper. D.G.-P.F. planned and made the overexpressing Mgv1 line. R.S. and N.A.F. conceived of some ideas, provided resources and helped plan experiments and contributed to data processing and analysis. J.S.A. helped plan experiments and analyzed and interpreted data. M.C.L. conceived of the idea, obtained funding, oversaw the planning of experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the final version of the paper. All co-authors edited the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-67597-z.
References
- 1.Gemma JN, Koske RE. Pre-infection interactions between roots and the mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora gigantea: Chemotropism of germ-tubes and root growth response. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1988;91:123–132. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80013-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sbrana C, Giovannetti M. Chemotropism in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Mycorrhiza. 2005;15:539–545. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0362-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jansson H-B, Johansson T, Nordbring-Hertz B, Tunlid A, Odham G. Chemotropic growth of germ-tubes of Cochliobolus sativus to barley roots or root exudates. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1988;90:647–650. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(88)80072-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bordallo JJ, et al. Colonization of plant roots by egg-parasitic and nematode-trapping fungi. New Phytol. 2002;154:491–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00399.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Turrà D, El Ghalid M, Rossi F, Di Pietro A. Fungal pathogen uses sex pheromone receptor for chemotropic sensing of host plant signals. Nature. 2015;527:521–524. doi: 10.1038/nature15516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Braunsdorf C, Mailänder-Sánchez D, Schaller M. Fungal sensing of host environment. Cell. Microbiol. 2016;18:1188–1200. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown NA, Schrevens S, Van Dijck P, Goldman GH. Fungal G-protein-coupled receptors: Mediators of pathogenesis and targets for disease control. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:402–414. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hilger D, Masureel M, Kobilka BK. Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018;25:4–12. doi: 10.1038/s41594-017-0011-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shukla AK, Singh G, Ghosh E. Emerging structural insights into biased GPCR signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014;39:594–602. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bologna Z, Teoh J, Bayoumi AS, Tang Y, Kim I. Biased G protein-coupled receptor signaling: New player in modulating physiology and pathology. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul) 2017;25:12–25. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2016.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou XE, Melcher K, Xu HE. Understanding the GPCR biased signaling through G protein and arrestin complex structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2017;45:150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choudhary P, Loewen MC. Quantification of mutation-derived bias for alternate mating functionalities of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ste2p pheromone receptor. J. Biochem. 2016;159:5. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvv072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schrick K, Garvik B, Hartwell LH. Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of the pheromone signal transduction pathway in the chemotropic response to pheromone. Genetics. 1997;147:19–32. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alvaro CG, Thorner J. Heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor signaling in yeast mating pheromone response. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:7785–7798. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.714980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jones SK, Bennett RJ. Fungal mating pheromones: Choreographing the dating game. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011;48:668–676. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haber JE. Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2012;191:33–64. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Segall JE. Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:8332–8336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barkai N, Rose MD, Wingreen NS. Protease helps yeast find mating partners. Nature. 1998;396:422–423. doi: 10.1038/24760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brizzio V, Gammie AE, Nijbroek G, Michaelis S, Rose MD. Cell fusion during yeast mating requires high levels of a-factor mating pheromone. J. Cell Biol. 1996;135:1727–1739. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elia L, Marsh L. Role of the ABC transporter Ste6 in cell fusion during yeast conjugation. J. Cell Biol. 1996;135:741–751. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.3.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jackson CL, Konopka JB, Hartwell LHS. cerevisiae alpha pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination. Cell. 1991;67:389–402. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90190-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shi C, Kaminskyj S, Caldwell S, Loewen MC. A role for a complex between activated G protein-coupled receptors in yeast cellular mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:5395–5400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608219104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dube P, Konopka JB. Identification of a polar region in transmembrane domain 6 that regulates the function of the G protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:7205–7215. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.12.7205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Di Pietro A, Madrid MP, Caracuel Z, Delgado-Jarana J, Roncero MIG. Fusarium oxysporum: Exploring the molecular arsenal of a vascular wilt fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003;4:315–325. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vitale S, Di Pietro A, Turrà D. Autocrine pheromone signalling regulates community behaviour in the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. Nat. Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0456-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goswami RS, Kistler HC. Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004;5:515–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee J, Leslie JF, Bowden RL. Expression and function of sex pheromones and receptors in the homothallic ascomycete Gibberella zeae. Eukaryot. Cell. 2008;7:1211–1221. doi: 10.1128/EC.00272-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hou Z, et al. A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 2002;15:1119–1127. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jenczmionka NJ, Maier FJ, Lösch AP, Schäfer W. Mating, conidiation and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum, the main causal agent of the head-blight disease of wheat, are regulated by the MAP kinase gpmk1. Curr. Genet. 2003;43:87–95. doi: 10.1007/s00294-003-0379-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Urban M, Mott E, Farley T, Hammond-Kosack K. The Fusarium graminearum MAP1 gene is essential for pathogenicity and development of perithecia. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003;4:347–359. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng D, et al. The FgHOG1 pathway regulates hyphal growth, stress responses, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Turrà D, Segorbe D, Di Pietro A. Protein kinases in plant-pathogenic fungi: Conserved regulators of infection. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014;52:267–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-050143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Buhrow LM, Cram D, Tulpan D, Foroud NA, Loewen MC. Exogenous abscisic acid and gibberellic acid elicit opposing effects on Fusarium graminearum infection in wheat. Phytopathology. 2016;106:88. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0033-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bresso E, et al. GPCRs from fusarium graminearum detection, modeling and virtual screening - the search for new routes to control head blight disease. BMC Bioinform. 2016;17:463. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1342-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim HK, Lee T, Yun SH. A putative pheromone signaling pathway is dispensable for self-fertility in the homothallic ascomycete Gibberella zeae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008;45:1188–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li Y, et al. FgMon1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor of FgRab7, is important for vacuole fusion, autophagy and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:18101. doi: 10.1038/srep18101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jia LJ, et al. A linear nonribosomal octapeptide from Fusarium graminearum facilitates cell-to-cell invasion of wheat. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:922. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08726-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yao SH, et al. A cytoplasmic Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase SOD1 contributes to hyphal growth and virulence of Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016;91:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rampitsch C, Leung WWY, Blackwell BA, Subramaniam R. MAP kinase Mgv1: A potential shared control point of butenolide and deoxynivalenol biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 2011;54:81–88. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lottersberger F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 14-3-3 proteins are required for the G1/S transition, actin cytoskeleton organization and cell wall integrity. Genetics. 2006;173:661–675. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.058172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mielnichuk N, Pérez-Martín J. 14-3-3 regulates the G2/M transition in the basidiomycete Ustilago maydis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008;45:1206–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu Q, et al. Unveiling equal importance of two 14-3-3 proteins for morphogenesis, conidiation, stress tolerance and virulence of an insect pathogen. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;17:1444–1462. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kraus PR, Hofmann AF, Harris SD. Characterization of the Aspergillus nidulans 14-3-3 homologue. ArtA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002;210:61–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ibarra BA, et al. The 14-3-3 protein homolog ArtA regulates development and secondary metabolism in the opportunistic plant pathogen Aspergillus flavus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;84:1–12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02241-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang TJ, et al. 14-3-3 proteins are involved in growth, hyphal branching, ganoderic acid biosynthesis, and response to abiotic stress in Ganoderma lucidum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;102:1769–1782. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8711-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brauer EK, Manes N, Bonner C, Subramaniam R. Two 14-3-3 proteins contribute to nitrogen sensing through the TOR and glutamine synthetase-dependent pathways in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2020;134:103277. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1995;8:593–601. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-8-0593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jiao F, Kawakami A, Nakajima T. Effects of different carbon sources on trichothecene production and Tri gene expression by Fusarium graminearum in liquid culture. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008;285:212–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Manners JM. Nutrient profiling reveals potent inducers of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009;46:604–613. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schreurs WJA, Harold RL, Harold FM. Chemotropism and branching as alternative responses of Achlya bisexualis to amino acids. Microbiology. 2009;135:2519–2528. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-9-2519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Musgrave A, Ero L, Scheffer R, Oehlers E. Chemotropism of Achlya bisexualis germ hyphae to casein hydrolysate and amino acids. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977;101:65–70. doi: 10.1099/00221287-101-1-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Manavathu EK, Thomas DS. Chemotropism of Achlya ambisexualis to methionine and methionyl. Microbiology. 1985;131:751–756. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-4-751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Strange RN, Smith H. A fungal growth stimulant in anthers which predisposes wheat to attack by Fusarium graminearum. Physiol. Pl. Path. 1971;1:141–150. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(71)90023-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Strange RN, Majer JR, Smith H. The isolation and identification of choline and betaine as the two major components in anthers and wheat germ that stimulate Fusarium graminearum in vitro. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1974;4:277–290. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(74)90015-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Strange RN, Smith H, Majer JR. Choline, one of two fungal growth stimulants in anthers responsible for the susceptibility of wheat to Fusarium graminearum. Nature. 1972;238:103–104. doi: 10.1038/238103a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pearce RB, Strange RN, Smith H. Glycinebetaine and choline in wheat: Distribution and relation to infection by Fusarium graminearum. Phytochemistry. 1976;15:953–954. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84377-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Engle JS, Lipps PE, Graham TL, Boehm MJ. Effects of choline, betaine, and wheat floral extracts on growth of Fusarium graminearum. Plant Dis. 2004;88:175–180. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.2.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kim H, Borkovich KA. A pheromone receptor gene, pre-1, is essential for mating type-specific directional growth and fusion of trichogynes and female fertility in Neurospora crassa. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;52:1781–1798. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee J, Lee T, Lee YW, Yun SH, Turgeon BG. Shifting fungal reproductive mode by manipulation of mating type genes: Obligatory heterothallism of Gibberella zeae. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;50:145–152. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hiraga S. A large family of class III plant peroxidases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:462–468. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Passardi F, Penel C, Dunand C. Performing the paradoxical: How plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:534–540. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Almagro L, et al. Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2009;60:377–390. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pritsch C, Muehlbauer GJ, Bushnell WR, Somers DA, Vance CP. Fungal development and induction of defense response genes during early infection of wheat spikes by Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000;13:159–169. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pritsch C, et al. Systemic expression of defense response genes in wheat spikes as a response to Fusarium graminearum infection. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001;58:1–12. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.2000.0308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jain N, et al. Large-scale stage-specific regulation of gene expression during host-pathogen interactions in CSP44 bread wheat carrying APR gene Lr48. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020;47:203–225. doi: 10.1071/FP18336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jiang C, et al. An expanded subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptor genes in Fusarium graminearum required for wheat infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0468-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bar EE, Ellicott AT, Stone DE. Gβγ recruits Rho1 to the site of polarized growth during mating in budding yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:21798–21804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212636200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Buehrer BM, Errede B. Coordination of the mating and cell integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:6517–6525. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gu Q, Chen Y, Liu Y, Zhang C, Ma Z. The transmembrane protein FgSho1 regulates fungal development and pathogenicity via the MAPK module Ste50-Ste11-Ste7 in Fusarium graminearum. New Phytol. 2015;206:315–328. doi: 10.1111/nph.13158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wanjiru WM, Zhensheng K, Buchenauer H. Importance of cell wall degrading enzymes produced by Fusarium graminearum during infection of wheat heads. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002;108:803–810. doi: 10.1023/A:1020847216155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cuperlovic-Culf M, Loewen M, Rajagopalan N, Surendra A. Perspectives on the specific targeting of Fusarium graminearum for the development of alternative head blight treatment approaches. Plant Pathol. 2017;66:1391–1403. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhao Y, et al. Antagonistic action of Bacillus subtilis strain SG6 on Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Shi C, et al. Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum growth and deoxynivalenol production in wheat kernels with bacterial antagonists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2014;11:1094–1105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110101094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Baldwin T, et al. Silencing efficiency of dsRNA fragments targeting Fusarium graminearum TRI6 and patterns of small interfering RNA associated with reduced virulence and mycotoxin production. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202798–e0202798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Koch A, et al. An RNAi-based control of Fusarium graminearum infections through spraying of long dsRNAs involves a plant passage and is controlled by the fungal silencing machinery. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005901–e1005901. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bekalu ZE, et al. Overexpression of nepenthesin HvNEP-1 in barley endosperm reduces fusarium head blight and mycotoxin accumulation. Agronomy. 2020;10:1–13. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10020203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gadaleta A, Colasuonno P, Giove SL, Blanco A, Giancaspro A. Map-based cloning of QFhb.mgb-2A identifies a WAK2 gene responsible for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43334-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Aviles, A. C. LSU Digital commons identification of quantitative trait loci ( QTLs ) for resistance to Fusarium head blight ( FHB ) in wheat variety AGS 2060 and evaluation of the effect of Fhb1 resistance gene on FHB reaction in a Louisiana wheat breeding population R. (2019).
- 79.Machado AK, Brown NA, Urban M, Kanyuka K, Hammond-Kosack KE. RNAi as an emerging approach to control Fusarium head blight disease and mycotoxin contamination in cereals. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018;74:790–799. doi: 10.1002/ps.4748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cappellini RA, Peterson JL. Macroconidium formation in submerged cultures by a non-sporulating strain of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia. 1965;57:962. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1965.12018285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nirenberg H. Untersuchungen über die morphologische und biologische Differenzierung in der Fusarium-Section Liseola. Mitteilungen der Biol. Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft. 1976;169:1–117. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Maehly AC. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Biochem. Anal. 2006;1:357–424. doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bitinaite J, et al. USERTM friendly DNA engineering and cloning method by uracil excision. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:1992–2002. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Frandsen RJN, Andersson JA, Kristensen MB, Giese H. Efficient four fragment cloning for the construction of vectors for targeted gene replacement in filamentous fungi. BMC Mol. Biol. 2008;9:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Frandsen, R. J. N., Frandsen, M. & Giese, H. Targeted Gene Replacement in Fungal Pathogens via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation. in Plant Fungal Pathogens: Methods and Protocols835, 17–45 (Humana press, 2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 87.Eranthodi A, et al. Enniatin production influences Fusarium avenaceum virulence on potato tubers, but not on durum wheat or peas. Pathogens. 2020;9:1–21. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9020075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhang X-W, et al. In planta stage-specific fungal gene profiling elucidates the molecular strategies of Fusarium graminearum growing inside wheat coleoptiles. Plant Cell. 2012;24:5159–5176. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yun Y, et al. Functional analysis of the Fusarium graminearum phosphatome. New Phytol. 2015;207:119–134. doi: 10.1111/nph.13374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.