Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Jul 2;9(27):e00654-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00654-20

Complete Genome Sequences of Seven Avibacterium paragallinarum Isolates from Poultry Farms in Pennsylvania, USA

Maurice Byukusenge a,*, Ruth H Nissly a, Lingling Li a, Traci Pierre a, Tammy Mathews a, Eva Wallner-Pendleton a, Patricia Dunn a, Denise Barnhart b, Sean Loughrey b, Sherrill Davison b, Donna J Kelly b, Deepanker Tewari c, Bhushan M Jayarao a, Suresh V Kuchipudi a,d,
Editor: Christina A Cuomoe
PMCID: PMC7330252  PMID: 32616650

Avibacterium paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza, causes significant economic losses to the poultry industry due to increased culling rates in growing chickens and decreased egg production in layers. We present the complete genome sequences of seven strains of Avibacterium paragallinarum isolated from poultry farms in Pennsylvania during 2019.

ABSTRACT

Avibacterium paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza, causes significant economic losses to the poultry industry due to increased culling rates in growing chickens and decreased egg production in layers. We present the complete genome sequences of seven strains of Avibacterium paragallinarum isolated from poultry farms in Pennsylvania during 2019.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Avibacterium paragallinarum, formerly classified as Haemophilus paragallinarum (1), causes infectious coryza (IC) in poultry. IC is a highly contagious respiratory disease of chickens resulting in high mortality, reduced egg production, and huge economic losses to the poultry industry worldwide (24). Since early 2019, there have been several outbreaks of IC in Pennsylvania. The complete genome sequences of seven Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates from these outbreaks were deposited in GenBank. Currently, there are very few whole-genome sequences of A. paragallinarum in public databases, and these genome sequences will facilitate further molecular epidemiologic analyses.

Samples submitted to the Pennsylvania Animal Diagnostic Laboratory System (PADLS) from IC-suspected chickens were streaked onto chocolate agar and incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 (5). Isolated single colonies were grown overnight in brain heart infusion broth (BD) supplemented with chicken serum and NAD. Bacterial DNA was extracted using the Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each isolate, two sequencing platforms, MinION from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Illumina MiniSeq, were used to leverage the accuracy of the short reads from Illumina and the long reads from ONT. The Illumina Nextera DNA Flex library prep kit and 1D native barcoding genomic DNA protocol (EXP-NBD104 and SQK-LSK109; Oxford Nanopore Technologies) were used to prepare the library for Illumina and MinION sequencing, respectively. The quality of the Illumina short reads (150 bp) was assessed using FastQC version 0.11.9 (6), and no further quality control was required. The ONT reads were base called using Guppy version 3.1.5 (available on the ONT community website). The program was run in “fast” mode with the option to simultaneously demultiplex the reads with barcode sequences. Filtlong version 0.2.0 (7) was used for quality control of the ONT reads. The options were set to filter out the smaller reads and trim off the regions with the lowest quality scores. This resulted in a total of 350 Mbp (coverage, ∼145×) of the longest reads with the highest quality scores.

Unicycler version 0.4.8 (8), with default options, was used to perform de novo hybrid assembly. For each genome, the assembly resulted in a single circular contig, which was rotated to allow all genomes to start at the same site (the DnaA gene). The assembled genomes were submitted to GenBank and were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (9). These isolates were previously identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and were later identified by in silico species identification using KmerFinder (10). FastANI (11) was used to calculate the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between the genome sequences. The ANI values between all of the genomes reported here are above 99.99% and are closer to those of two genomes from Peru, strains 72 (ANI, 99.86%) and FARPER-174 (ANI, 99.74%) (12, 13), and strain AVPG2015 from Mexico (ANI, 99.88%).

Data availability.

These data were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA625662. The complete sequences and their corresponding raw reads have been deposited in GenBank and the SRA, and the details are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Metrics and accession numbers of genome sequences of Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates from Pennsylvania

Isolate Genome size (bp) GC content (%) Total no. of genes Illumina data:
Oxford Nanopore data:
SRA accession no. GenBank accession no.
Total no. of reads (bp) Avg read length (bp) Avg coverage (×) Total no. of reads N50 (bp) Avg coverage (×)
ADL-AP01 2,415,542 40.91 2,330 821,856 148 50 126,648 14,949 400 SRS6501300 CP051642
ADL-AP02 2,416,187 40.92 2,328 988,642 148 61 143,612 14,599 443 SRS6501303 CP051641
ADL-AP07 2,415,993 40.91 2,230 1,034,010 148 63 203,889 13,633 599 SRS6501304 CP051640
ADL-AP10 2,415,552 40.91 2,334 554,656 148 34 228,213 13,294 523 SRS6501305 CP051639
ADL-AP15 2,415,950 40.92 2,337 697,442 148 43 155,612 13,500 450 SRS6501306 CP051638
ADL-AP16 2,415,855 40.91 2,331 2,170,560 147 132 281,174 13,210 610 SRS6501301 CP051637
ADL-AP17 2,415,699 40.91 2,331 2,671,088 148 164 115,998 15,175 378 SRS6501302 CP051636

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was funded by grant support from the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (OSP no. 189021) and the United States Department of Agriculture (OSP no. 197702).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blackall PJ, Christensen H, Beckenham T, Blackall LL, Bisgaard M. 2005. Reclassification of Pasteurella gallinarum, [Haemophilus] paragallinarum, Pasteurella avium and Pasteurella volantium as Avibacterium gallinarum gen. nov., comb. nov., Avibacterium paragallinarum comb. nov., Avibacterium avium comb. nov. and Avibacterium volantium comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:353–362. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63357-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crispo M, Blackall P, Khan A, Shivaprasad HL, Clothier K, Sentíes-Cué CG, Cooper G, Blakey J, Pitesky M, Mountainspring G, Cutler G, Bickford A, Stoute S. 2019. Characterization of an outbreak of infectious coryza (Avibacterium paragallinarum) in commercial chickens in central California. Avian Dis 63:486–494. doi: 10.1637/19-00081.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heuvelink A, Wiegel J, Kehrenberg C, Dijkman R, Soriano-Vargas E, Feberwee A. 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates from outbreaks of infectious coryza in Dutch commercial poultry flocks, 2008–2017. Vet Microbiol 217:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muhammad TMN, Sreedevi B. 2015. Detection of Avibacterium paragallinarum by polymerase chain reaction from outbreaks of infectious coryza of poultry in Andhra Pradesh. Vet World 8:103–108. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.103-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hsu Y-M, Shieh HK, Chen W-H, Sun T-Y, Shiang J-H. 2007. Antimicrobial susceptibility, plasmid profiles and haemocin activities of Avibacterium paragallinarum strains. Vet Microbiol 124:209–218. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 7.Wick R. 2017. Filtlong, v0.2.0. C++. https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong.
  • 8.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Lukjancenko O, Saputra D, Rasmussen S, Hasman H, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Aarestrup FM, Ussery DW, Lund O. 2014. Benchmarking of methods for genomic taxonomy. J Clin Microbiol 52:1529–1539. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02981-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tataje-Lavanda L, Montalván Á, Montesinos R, Morales-Erasto V, Zimic-Peralta M, Fernández-Sánchez M, Fernández-Díaz M. 2019. Genomic islands in the full-genome sequence of an NAD-hemin-independent Avibacterium paragallinarum strain isolated from Peru. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00118-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00118-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Requena D, Chumbe A, Torres M, Alzamora O, Ramirez M, Valdivia-Olarte H, Gutierrez AH, Izquierdo-Lara R, Saravia LE, Zavaleta M, Tataje-Lavanda L, Best I, Fernández-Sánchez M, Icochea E, Zimic M, Fernández-Díaz M. 2013. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of Avibacterium paragallinarum. Bioinformation 9:528–536. doi: 10.6026/97320630009528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

These data were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA625662. The complete sequences and their corresponding raw reads have been deposited in GenBank and the SRA, and the details are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Metrics and accession numbers of genome sequences of Avibacterium paragallinarum isolates from Pennsylvania

Isolate Genome size (bp) GC content (%) Total no. of genes Illumina data:
Oxford Nanopore data:
SRA accession no. GenBank accession no.
Total no. of reads (bp) Avg read length (bp) Avg coverage (×) Total no. of reads N50 (bp) Avg coverage (×)
ADL-AP01 2,415,542 40.91 2,330 821,856 148 50 126,648 14,949 400 SRS6501300 CP051642
ADL-AP02 2,416,187 40.92 2,328 988,642 148 61 143,612 14,599 443 SRS6501303 CP051641
ADL-AP07 2,415,993 40.91 2,230 1,034,010 148 63 203,889 13,633 599 SRS6501304 CP051640
ADL-AP10 2,415,552 40.91 2,334 554,656 148 34 228,213 13,294 523 SRS6501305 CP051639
ADL-AP15 2,415,950 40.92 2,337 697,442 148 43 155,612 13,500 450 SRS6501306 CP051638
ADL-AP16 2,415,855 40.91 2,331 2,170,560 147 132 281,174 13,210 610 SRS6501301 CP051637
ADL-AP17 2,415,699 40.91 2,331 2,671,088 148 164 115,998 15,175 378 SRS6501302 CP051636

Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES