Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has once again highlighted the importance of access to sufficient quantities of safe water and sanitation in public health. In the current COVID-19 pandemic, an early warning wastewater system has been proposed as a platform for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, and a potentially important public health strategy to combat the disease. This short communication on wastewater surveillance in sub-Saharan Africa highlights challenges, opportunities and alternatives taken into account the local context.
Keywords: Wastewater, Sub-Saharan African, Sanitation, COVID-19
Graphical abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has once again highlighted the importance of access to sufficient quantities of safe water, and sanitation in public health. Well managed water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) are critical for protection of human health during disease outbreaks (World Bank, 2020). Wastewater contains viruses, bacteria and parasites and inadequate treatment of, or exposure to, wastewater and fecal sludge plays a role in spreading disease (Carr et al., 2004; UN, 2020). On the other hand, tracking of wastewater has historically played a key role in the development of early warning systems (EWS) for various enteric viruses, including poliovirus, norovirus and hepatitis (Hovi et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2016; Tiwari and Dhole, 2018). In 2011, Kano State of Nigeria was the first on the African continent to introduce environmental surveillance for poliovirus and many other regions in Africa have since included wastewater surveillance to supplement polio eradication efforts (Gumede et al., 2018; Weldegebriel et al., 2015; Eboh et al., 2018). To date, the screening of wastewater is recognized as an important tool for monitoring wild poliovirus and vaccine-derived polioviruses (Gumede et al., 2018; World Health Organization, 2003).
In the current COVID-19 pandemic, tracking of wastewater has been proposed as a platform for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, and a potentially important public health strategy to combat the disease (Mao et al., 2020a; Sharif et al., 2020). Diarrhea is a frequent presenting symptom in patients with COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in stool samples from both adults and children (Ahmed et al., 2020; D'Amico et al., 2020; Kitajima et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). Thus SARS-CoV-2 surveillance through water-based epidemiology (WBE) is a potential complimentary and cost-effective approach to enable wide scale screening which would reduce labor intensive and costly personal COVID-19 testing and tracings (Mao et al., 2020a; Brouwer et al., 2018; Hart and Halden, 2020). To date, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been demonstrated in the wastewater of a growing number of countries including Australia, France, the Netherlands and the United States of America (Ahmed et al., 2020; Lodder and de Roda Husman, 2020; Medema et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Wurtzer et al., 2020). Notably most of this work has been carried out in high-income countries.
Like most epidemics, the rapid spread of COVID-19 is likely to disproportionately affect the most disadvantaged and vulnerable communities (Hart and Halden, 2020; Kinner et al., 2020; Health, T.L.P, 2020). Currently COVID-19 prevalence is influenced by regions supporting high frequency screening and testing, compared with poorly resourced regions where low prevalence may be linked to underreporting (Hart and Halden, 2020; Kavanagh et al., 2020). Therefore, wastewater surveillance systems may prove critical in many low- and middle-income countries where health systems infrastructure, testing systems, personal protective equipment (PPE) and human resource capacity are constrained (Kavanagh et al., 2020; Martinez-Alvarez et al., 2020). Nonetheless, the proposed opportunities presented by wastewater surveillance need to be understood in the local context which will in turn give rise to locally relevant, evidence-informed solutions.
In 2017, among the 2 billion people worldwide still without basic sanitation coverage, 35% (709 million) lived in sub-Saharan Africa (World Health Organization, 2019). Unlike well-resourced countries, there is a high reliance on non-sewered sanitation systems across the region. Mostly evident in rural areas, the ten countries with the highest levels of open defecation are all in sub-Saharan Africa (World Health Organization, 2019). Approximately one in five people in Africa practice open defecation which, from a public health perspective, may contribute to the spread of disease (Hickling, 2013; Saleem et al., 2019).
By 2030, the sustainable development goal (SDG) 6 aims to achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and eliminate open defecation (WHO, 2014). In South Africa, which has one of the biggest economies in Africa, albeit also having one of the highest inequality rates, approximately 37% of households are not connected to a water-borne sewage system, and instead rely on alternatives such as pit latrines, bucket toilets and chemical toilets (StatsSA, 2017). The low level of connection to wastewater treatment plants will have to be considered when designing an EWS and alternatives will need to be found for those not connected to the sewage network. For example, the possible release of raw sewage into the water course calls for the investigation into contaminated surface waters which may provide relevant information on distribution and persistence of enteroviruses, including SARS CoV-2, circulating in a particular community (Apostol et al., 2012; Hamza et al., 2009).
Globally, sub-Saharan Africa has the highest proportion of the population sharing toilets (Rheinländer et al., 2015; WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply Sanitation Monitoring Programme, 2014). In densely populated urban areas, communal or shared toilets are common (Morella et al., 2008).
A study of 100 households in a low-income urban settlement of Nakuru, Kenya revealed that all pit latrines were shared by more than one family, and the average number of people sharing a pit latrine was 23 individuals (ranging between 4 and 56) (Gudda et al., 2018). To date, no cases of transmission via the fecal–oral or waterborne routes have been reported for SARS-CoV-2, and it has been suggested that infection via this route is improbable during quarantine or while under self-isolation (Wu et al., 2020; Amirian, 2020). However, this may not be the case for shared spaces and potential fecal–oral transmission might pose an increased risk in contained living premises such as hostels and similar places of overcrowding (Wu et al., 2020). The sampling of non-sewered systems such as pit latrines has been proposed as a potentially important tool for community health surveillance in low resource settings (LaHue and Alexander, 2018), which needs to be investigated for SARS CoV-2.
Africa has the highest rate of population growth and the population is estimated to double by 2050 (UN, 2019). This will cause an added strain in providing services for basic sanitation. Fecal coliform concentration is strongly associated with upstream population density (Milledge et al., 2018; UN Water, 2015) therefore the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater treatment plants that service areas with high population density needs to be determined.
In regions connected to the wastewater system, the type of sewage network (e.g. separate or combined) may influence the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2. In many cases the operation and maintenance of the separate systems, whereby separate pipes are used to transport the surface run-off and the sewage, are not well managed (UN Water, 2015). Furthermore, wastewater systems may have large numbers of unlawful connections such as illegal discharge into stormwater drains (UN Water, 2015; Levin et al., 2020). Little is known about the impact of dysfunctional sewer systems, as have been reported throughout Africa, on capacity to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater. Extreme weather events such as floods can damage or destroy wastewater treatment systems and cause overflow of untreated sewage (WHO, 2019). Moreover, the rainy season is associated with the increase in the overflowing of pit latrines (Nakagiri et al., 2016; Sengupta et al., 2018). Owing to the impacts of climate change, sub-Saharan Africa has been identified as a vulnerable region with emphasis on weather-related extremes such as floods (Carabine et al., 2014). This will further compound increasingly overburdened wastewater systems. Season change and differing climate regions have pronounced effects on wastewater surveillance and may affect the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater (Hart and Halden, 2020). According to Hart and Halden (Hart and Halden, 2020) temperature effects may affect virus detectability and if such factors are not taken into account, wastewater temperature may lead to under or over estimating COVID-19 prevalence and thereby misinform the public health response. This is a key consideration when planning a national wastewater surveillance in expansive countries like Algeria, Nigeria and South Africa which have national climatic diversity. However, if properly used, the EWS could detect COVID-19 hotspots brought on by such extreme climate events (Kitajima et al., 2020).
The complexity of testing wastewater as a surveillance tool, including specific challenges related to SARS-CoV-2 wastewater testing, have been well described (Mao et al., 2020a; Kitajima et al., 2020; La Rosa et al., 2020). A study in 2013 revealed that of the 49 sub-Saharan Africa countries, 37 (76%) had no clinical laboratory accredited to international standards (Schroeder and Amukele, 2014). Wastewater testing requires expensive equipment and skilled laboratory staff to manage the complicated sample handling and processing (World Health Organization, 2003; Mao et al., 2020a). As the reproducibility of wastewater sampling to guide public health interventions is crucial, intra- and inter-laboratory comparison is important for quality control (Ahmed et al., 2020); however lack of laboratory coverage may limit this important quality aspect aligned with Good Laboratory Practice. Current work is underway to develop small, portable paper-based wastewater testing devices that aim to reduce the above-mentioned issues, including possible lack of power supply (Mao et al., 2020b) which may be well suited for low resource settings. It is noteworthy that a few patient-centered rapid immunodiagnostic tests are currently available but only in higher income settings (Kavanagh et al., 2020).
In conclusion, the burden of poor sanitation falls disproportionately on the poor who require urgent and innovative COVID-19 responses within complex circumstances. The viability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in feces needs urgent investigation in high risk settings (Wu et al., 2020; Yuen et al., 2020), particularly for those communities practicing open defecation and those using unimproved sanitation facilities. Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to be a powerful public health tool in Africa, however alternatives to sampling from wastewater treatment plants need to be supported by solutions for more locally relevant situations taking sanitation diversity into consideration.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Renée Street: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Shirley Malema: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Nomfundo Mahlangeni: Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Angela Mathee: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The South African Medical Research Council is thanked for funding and support.
Editor: Kevin V. Thomas
References
- Ahmed W., et al. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;728:138764. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amirian E.S. Potential fecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: current evidence and implications for public health. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;95:363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Apostol L.N.G., et al. Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of enteroviruses from sewage-polluted urban and rural rivers in the Philippines. Virus Genes. 2012;45(2):207–217. doi: 10.1007/s11262-012-0776-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer A.F., et al. Epidemiology of the silent polio outbreak in Rahat, Israel, based on modeling of environmental surveillance data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115(45):E10625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808798115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carabine E., Lemma A., Dupar M. Climate & Development Knowledge Network (CDKN); 2014. The IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report: What’s in it for Africa; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- Carr R., Blumenthal U., Duncan Mara D. Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater in agriculture: revisiting WHO guidelines. Water Sci. Technol. 2004;50(2):31–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D’Amico F., et al. Diarrhea during COVID-19 infection: pathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention and management. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;18:1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eboh V.A., et al. Notes from the field: widespread transmission of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus identified by environmental surveillance and immunization response - horn of Africa, 2017–2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2018;67(28):787–789. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6728a6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gudda F., et al. Transformation Towards Sustainable and Resilient WASH Services: Proceedings of the 41st WEDC International Conference, Nakuru, Kenya. 2018. Pit latrine faecal sludge accu-mulation: assessment of trends and determinants in low-income settlements, Nakuru, Kenya; pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- Gumede N., et al. Progress on the implementation of environmental surveillance in the African region, 2011–2016. J. Immunol. Sci. 2018;(Suppl(4)):24–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamza I.A., et al. Detection of human viruses in rivers of a densly-populated area in Germany using a virus adsorption elution method optimized for PCR analyses. Water Res. 2009;43(10):2657–2668. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart O.E., Halden R.U. Computational analysis of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance by wastewater-based epidemiology locally and globally: feasibility, economy, opportunities and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;730:138875. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Health, T.L.P COVID-19 puts societies to the test. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e235. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30097-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hickling S. Sanitation and Hygiene in Africa: Where Do We Stand? vol. 36. 2013. Status of sanitation and hygiene in Africa; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
- Hovi T., et al. Role of environmental poliovirus surveillance in global polio eradication and beyond. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012;140(1):1–13. doi: 10.1017/S095026881000316X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kavanagh M.M., et al. Access to lifesaving medical resources for African countries: COVID-19 testing and response, ethics, and politics. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1735–1738. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31093-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinner S.A., et al. Prisons and custodial settings are part of a comprehensive response to COVID-19. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(4):e188–e189. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30058-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitajima M., et al. SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: state of the knowledge and research needs. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;739:139076. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- La Rosa G., et al. Coronavirus in water environments: occurrence, persistence and concentration methods-a scoping review. Water Res. 2020;179:115899. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaHue N., Alexander K.A. Pit latrines: a noninvasive sampling strategy to assess fecal pathogen occurrence in low resource communities. J. Community Health. 2018;43(6):1155–1160. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0535-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levin R., Housh M., Portnov B.A. Characterization of localities with a high likelihood of illicit connections between runoff and sewage systems. Environ. Manag. 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01281-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodder W., de Roda Husman A.M. SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: potential health risk, but also data source. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020:502–505. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30087-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao K., et al. The potential of wastewater-based epidemiology as surveillance and early warning of infectious disease outbreaks. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health. 2020;17:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao K., Zhang H., Yang Z. ACS Publications; 2020. Can a Paper-based Device Trace COVID-19 Sources With Wastewater-based Epidemiology? [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Alvarez M., et al. COVID-19 pandemic in west Africa. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8(5):e631–e632. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30123-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medema G., et al. Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in sewage. MedRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.29.20045880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milledge D.G., et al. Population density controls on microbial pollution across the Ganga catchment. Water Res. 2018;128:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morella E., Foster V., Banerjee S.G. Background Paper. 2008. Climbing the ladder: the state of sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Nakagiri A., et al. Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rheinländer T., et al. Redefining shared sanitation. Bull. World Health Organ. 2015;93:509–510. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.144980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saleem M., Burdett T., Heaslip V. Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder L., Amukele T. Medical laboratories in Sub-Saharan Africa that meet international quality standards. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014;141(6):791–795. doi: 10.1309/AJCPQ5KTKAGSSCFN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sengupta S., Verma R., Kazmi S. 2018. Bottom to the Fore: State of Sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa, in Centre for Science and Environment. [Google Scholar]
- Sharif S., et al. 2020. Detection of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in Wastewater, Using the Existing Environmental Surveillance Network: An Epidemiological Gateway to an Early Warning for COVID-19 in Communities. medRxiv. (p. 2020.06.03.20121426) [Google Scholar]
- Smith D.B., Paddy J.O., Simmonds P. The use of human sewage screening for community surveillance of hepatitis E virus in the UK. J. Med. Virol. 2016;88(5):915–918. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- StatsSA . 2017. General Household Survey 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari S., Dhole T.N. Assessment of enteroviruses from sewage water and clinical samples during eradication phase of polio in North India. Virol. J. 2018;15(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1075-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- UN . 2019. Population. [Google Scholar]
- UN WASH (Water, Sanitation & Hygiene) and COVID-19. UN Environment. 2020. https://www.unenvironment.org/cep/wastewater-sewage-and-sanitation cited Access 10 May 2020; Available from.
- UN Water . 2015. Wastewater Management – A UN-Water Analytical Brief. [Google Scholar]
- Weldegebriel G., et al. Environmental surveillance for poliovirus in polio high risk states of Nigeria, 2011–2012. Sci. J. Public Health. 2015;3(5):655. [Google Scholar]
- WHO . 2014. UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-water (GLAAS) 2014 Report: Investing in Water and Sanitation: Increasing Access, Reducing Inequalities. [Google Scholar]
- WHO . 2019. WHO Climate, Sanitation and Health. [Google Scholar]
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply Sanitation Monitoring Programme . World Health Organization; 2014. Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation: 2014 Update. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank . 2020. WASH (Water, Sanitation & Hygiene) and COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2003. Guidelines for Environmental Surveillance of Poliovirus Circulation. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization . World Health Organization; 2019. Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2017: Special Focus on Inequalities. [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y., et al. Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;5(5):434–435. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30083-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wurtzer S., et al. Time course quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Parisian wastewaters correlates with COVID-19 confirmed cases. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.12.20062679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y., et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat. Med. 2020;26:502–505. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuen K.-S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: the most important research questions. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:40. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00404-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]