Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2020 Apr 28;31(5):1132–1139. doi: 10.1021/jasms.0c00058

Quantitative Middle-Down MS Analysis of Parkin-Mediated Ubiquitin Chain Assembly

Kirandeep K Deol 1, Stephen J Eyles 2, Eric R Strieter 3
PMCID: PMC7333183  NIHMSID: NIHMS1600746  PMID: 32297515

Abstract

Misregulation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin and the kinase PINK1 underlie both inherited and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease-associated neurodegeneration. Parkin and PINK1 work together to catalyze the assembly of ubiquitin chains on substrates located on the outer mitochondrial membrane to facilitate autophagic removal of damaged mitochondria through a process termed mitophagy. Quantitative measurements of Parkin-mediated chain assembly, both in vitro and on mitochondria, have revealed that chains are composed of Lys6, Lys11, Lys48, and Lys63 linkages. The combinatorial nature of these chains is further expanded by the ability of PINK1 to phosphorylate individual subunits. The precise architecture of chains produced by the coordinated action of PINK1 and Parkin, however, are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that quantitative middle-down mass spectrometry using uniformly 15N-labeled ubiquitin variants as internal standards informs on the extent of chain branching. We find that Parkin is a prolific branching enzyme in vitro. Quantitative middle-down mass spectrometry also reveals that phospho-Ser65-ubiquitin (pSer65-Ub)—a key activator of Parkin—is not incorporated into chains to a significant extent. Our results suggest that Parkin-mediated chain branching is “on-pathway”, and branch points are the principal targets of the deubiquitinase USP30.

Keywords: post-translational modifications, ubiquitin, ubiquitin chains, polyubiquitin, phospho-ubiquitin, E3 ligase, Parkin, mitophagy, middle-down mass spectrometry

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1600746-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a devastating neurological disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons that affects 7–10 million people worldwide.1 Although the etiology is largely unknown, defects in oxidative phosphorylation are thought to contribute to PD pathogenesis.24 When errors occur, reactive oxygen species accumulate, resulting in damaged mitochondria, which must be rapidly disposed of through a process called mitophagy to avoid detrimental effects on cellular physiology. The E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase Parkin and the kinase PINK1 play key roles in mitophagy.57 Somatic mutations in the genes encoding Parkin (PARK2) and PINK1 (PARK6) are directly linked to an early onset form of the disease known as autosomal-recessive juvenile Parkinsonism (AR-JP), which accounts for 5–10% of all cases.8,9

Over the last 5 years, the mechanism by which Parkin and PINK1 promote mitophagy has been elucidated.1017 Following damage, PINK1 accumulates on the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM), where it activates Parkin via a multistep feedforward mechanism. During the initial stages, PINK1 phosphorylates Ser65 of Ub (pSer65-Ub) to recruit auto-inhibited cytosolic Parkin.1820 The pSer65-Ub–Parkin interaction stimulates Ub ligase activity, resulting in the formation of ubiquitin chains, which also serve as substrates of PINK1 to further retain and activate Parkin. Another consequence of the pSer65-Ub–Parkin interaction is that it releases the N-terminal Ub-like (Ubl) domain from the core of Parkin, increasing the rate at which PINK1 phosphorylates Ser65 of the Ubl domain.14,2126 Once Parkin is phosphorylated, it is stabilized in an open and active conformation, and the binding affinity to pSer65-Ub is enhanced by ~20-fold.27 Thus, the pSer65-Ub–pSer65-Parkin complex supports full retention and activation to ultimately afford a high density of Ub chains to mark damaged mitochondria for mitophagy. The precise architecture of these chains is unknown. Considering the MOM-bound chains are decoded by a set of Ub chain-binding autophagy receptors that control the flux through mitophagy, it is imperative to gain deeper insight into the architecture of chains built by Parkin.2830

There is an astounding number of possible Ub chains that can be synthesized on the MOM. Ub has seven lysines (Lys6, Lys11, Lys27, Lys29, Lys33, Lys48, and Lys63) and an amino terminus (Met1), allowing for chains to be assembled using a single linkage (homotypic) or a mixture of linkages (heterotypic). Branched chains can also emerge when a Ub subunit is modified at more than one amino group. In vitro, Parkin catalyzes the formation of chains bearing Lys6, Lys11, Lys48, and Lys63 linkages.15,27,31,32 The same linkages are generated in mitochondrial depolarized cells overexpressing Parkin, but in depolarized embryonic stem-cell-derived neurons, the prevailing linkage type is Lys63.33 On top of this complexity, PINK1 can phosphorylate any chain type and, in principle, any subunit, although there is evidence that phosphorylation at the distal position is preferred.34 The combinatorial nature of these modifications presents a significant analytical challenge for defining chain architecture. Most methods rely on information from tryptic peptides to report on linkage composition and the extent of phosphorylation. However, information on the architecture of chains is lost.

Our lab has previously shown that the combination of limited trypsinolysis and intact MS enables the characterization of multiple modifications on a single Ub subunit and can inform on chain architecture.3537 In the context of Parkin-derived chains, the challenge is that phosphate groups are known to affect ionization efficiency, making it difficult to quantify the abundance of Ub and pSer65-Ub in their unmodified and modified forms. Here, we sought to address this problem by developing a method to quantify Ub and pSer65-Ub derivatives in chain assembly reactions with Parkin alone and in the presence of the mitochondrial deubiquitinase USP30.32,34,38

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Protein Expression and Purification.

E1 was purified as previously described.39 Briefly, N-terminally His6-tagged E1 was expressed in Rosetta 2(DE3) pLysS Escherichia coli cells in LB media supplemented with appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C to OD600 ~ 0.6–0.8 and transferred at 18 °C for 16 h after induction with 250 μM IPTG. Cultures were harvested, flash frozen, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 10 mM imidazole), lysed by sonication, and clarified at 60,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Clarified lysate was then incubated with Ni-NTA resin for 1 h, washed with lysis buffer, and eluted into Ni-NTA elution buffer (lysis buffer plus 300 mM imidazole).

UBE2L3 was purified as previously described.35 N-Terminally GST-tagged UBE2L3 was expressed in Rosetta 2(DE3) pLysS E. coli cells in LB media supplemented with appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C to OD600 ~ 0.6 and transferred to 16 °C for 16 h after induction with 250 μM IPTG. Cultures were harvested, flash frozen, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT), lysed by sonication, and clarified at 30,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Clarified lysate was then incubated with GST resin for 1 h, washed with lysis buffer, resuspended into 3C protease buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl), and cleaved overnight with 3C protease.

N-Terminally His6-SUMO-tagged Parkin was expressed in Rosetta 2(DE3) pLysS E. coli cells in LB media supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and 300 μM ZnCl2 at 37 °C to OD600 ~ 0.6 and transferred to 16 °C for 12 h after induction with 50 μM IPTG. Cultures were harvested, flash frozen, resuspended in lysis buffer (75 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 0.5 mM TCEP, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM benzamide, 0.1 mM PMSF in the presence of DNase I), lysed by sonication, and clarified at 30,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Clarified lysate was then incubated with Ni-NTA resin for 1 h, washed with 75 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 0.5 mM TCEP, 500 mM NaCl, and eluted from the resin using an imidazole gradient (wash buffer containing 100 mM imidazole and then again with 300 mM imidazole). Parkin was further purified using gel filtration (Superdex 75, GE Life Sciences) with 50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4 and 300 mM NaCl.

N-Terminally His6-MBP-tagged Tribolium castaneum PINK1 (TcPINK1) was expressed in BL21 (DE3) pLysS E. coli cells in LB media supplemented with appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C to OD600 ~ 0.6 and transferred to 16 °C for 16 h after induction with 250 μM IPTG. Cultures were harvested, flash frozen, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mM TCEP, 1 mM benzamidine, 0.1 mM PMSF), lysed by sonication, and clarified at 30,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Clarified lysate was then incubated with amylose resin for 1 h and washed with high salt buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 0.1 mM TCEP, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol) and then low salt buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 0.1 mM TCEP, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol). His-MBP-tagged TcPINK1 was eluted from the resin using low salt buffer containing 12 mM maltose.

15N-Labeled ubiquitin was expressed in 2xYT media from Rosetta 2(DE3) pLysS E. coli cells using the high-cell-density expression method adapted from Marley et al.40 Once cultures reached an OD600 of 0.8, cells were concentrated (4×) and transferred into M9 media. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C to allow discharge of unlabeled metabolites and then supplemented with 20% w/v glucose and 0.5 g of 15NH4Cl, and induced with 800 μM IPTG followed by 4 h expression at 37 °C. Cells were harvested and purified as previously reported.

Generation of pSer65-Ubiquitin.

Ub, 15N-Ub, or Lys63 di-Ub (5 mg) was resuspended in 50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.8 mM ATP. Phosphorylation was initiated by adding 5 μM TcPINK1 and incubated overnight at 30 °C. The reaction was quenched with 10% v/v ammonium acetate and buffer exchanged in 20 mM Tris pH 8.7. Phosphorylated Ub was further separated using anion exchange with running buffer A (20 mM Tris pH 8.7) and buffer B (50 mM Tris pH 7.4) using a 0–60% gradient over 7 CV.

Ubiquitination/Deubiquitination Assays.

Ubiquitination/deubiquitination assays were performed by mixing 150 nM E1, 1 μM UBE2L3, 1.3 μM Parkin, 30 μM ubiquitin, USP30 (as indicated), and 2 mM ATP in 50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2. Ubiquitination was initiated by adding 0.5 μM TcPINK1. The reaction took place for indicated time points at 30 °C and was quenched by adding 6× Laemmli buffer (for Western blotting) or flash frozen (for mass spectrometry).

Parkin Pulldown Assay.

In vitro ubiquitination reactions were flash frozen and diluted into binding buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% IGEPAL) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h with Ni-NTA resin. Following four washes with minimal buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) and water, the resin was resuspended in TEV cleavage buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 0.5 mM TCEP). Ubiquitinated Parkin was released from Ni-NTA resin using TEV protease overnight at 4 °C to remove the His6-SUMO tag.

Minimal Trypsin Digestion.

For mass spectrometry, ubiquitinated Parkin samples were buffer exchanged into 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate, whereas in vitro ubiquitination/deubiquitination reaction products were flash frozen at indicated time points. Using an empirically determined ratio of trypsin to ubiquitin (1:150 or 30 μL of total reaction mixture), all samples were digested under nondenaturing conditions for 2 h at 37 °C with trypsin (0.5 μg).35,41 Trypsin was deactivated with 10% v/v acetic acid and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min, and the resulting mixtures were dialyzed into water using Slide-A-lyzer MINI dialysis units with a 3.5 kDa MWCO (ThermoFisher). All samples were then dried using a speed vac and resuspended into 20 μL of 1% formic acid.

Linear Range and Reproducibility of N-15 Ub Standards.

15N-Ub and 15N-pSer65 Ub mixtures were prepared at 25, 50, 150, 250, and 500 fmol/μL in a constant background of 75 ng/μL of unlabeled Ub and pSer65 Ub in 1% formic acid. On-column injections (2 μL) were performed in a randomized order.

Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Samples were injected (5 μL) and separated on an Easy nLC 1000 UHPLC equipped with a homemade 15 cm nanoLC column (ProntoSIL C4 5 μm 300A, NanoLCMS Solutions) using a linear gradient of 0 to 5% B over 5 min, 5 to 70% B over 20 min, and 70 to 90% over 10 min (solvent A: 0.1% FA in water, solvent B: 0.1% FA in ACN) using a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The resolution of the Orbitrap Fusion was set at 60,000 with an AGC target of 4.0 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 200 ms. For tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) using ETD, individual charge states of the protein molecular ions were isolated and dissociated by ETD using 10 ms reaction time, 2.0 × 105 reagent ion target, and 10% supplemental collisional induced dissociation. The resolution of the Orbitrap Fusion was set at 60,000 with an isolation window of 1.7 m/z, an AGC target of 5.0 × 104, and maximum injection time of 500 ms. All spectra were processed with MASH Suite Software using a signal-to-noise (S/N) threshold of 3 and a fit factor of 70% and then validated manually.42,43 Percentages correspond to the relative quantification values between the charge states of 11+ for all five species: Ub1–74, pSer65 Ub1–74, 1xdiGly-Ub1–74, pSer65 1xdiGly-Ub1–74, and 2xdiGly-Ub1–74 after normalization with 15N-labeled standards.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Middle-Down MS Analysis of Parkin-Mediated Chain Assembly.

Ubiquitination reactions with Parkin and PINK1 were monitored by Western blot analysis using α-Ub and α-pSer65-Ub antibodies. At the earliest time point (5 min), high molecular weight (HMW) Ub conjugates corresponding to autoubiquitinated products and unanchored ubiquitin chains can already be observed (Figure 1A). By 1 h, the formation of HMW conjugates has nearly reached its plateau. Immunoblotting with the α-pSer65-Ub antibody shows that pSer65-Ub is also incorporated into the HMW conjugates within a similar time frame.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Ubiquitin chain assembly by Parkin. (A) Time course analysis of ubiquitination reactions with Parkin (1.3 μM) and PINK1 (0.5 μM). (B) Middle-down MS analysis of a 60 min Parkin reaction after minimal trypsinolysis with UBE2L3 (1 μM) as E2. The spectrum corresponds to the Ub11+ charge state. (C) ETD analysis (c and z* ions) of diGly-pSer65-Ub1–74 mapped onto the Ub sequence containing a di-Gly modification at Lys63 and phosphorylation at S65. Red circles represent theoretical isotopic abundance distribution of isotopomer peaks. Calc’d: calculated monoisotopic weight; expt’l: experimental monoisotopic weight.

We then availed middle-down MS to gain more insight into the architecture of chains produced by Parkin. Crude reaction mixtures were trypsinized under native conditions to generate Ub1–74 variants. Subsequent intact MS analysis shows that mono-Ub (Ub1–74), not surprisingly, represents the bulk of the Ub species (Figure 1B). Nevertheless, unphosphorylated (diGly-Ub1–74) and phosphorylated (diGly-pSer65-Ub1–74) chains can still be observed along with branch points (2xdiGly-Ub1–74). What is rather intriguing is the ratio of branching (2xdiGly-Ub1–74) to the unbranched portion (diGly-Ub1–74) of a chain. Using mixtures of linkage specific enzymes to assemble branched chains, we typically measure ratios of 0.1–0.2. With Parkin, the ratio is close to 0.5, suggesting chain branching is extensive.

Previous work has shown that Parkin is unable to incorporate pSer65-Ub into chains when pSer65-Ub is the only source of Ub.34,44 Our middle-down data reveal that subunits within a chain are phosphorylated when PINK1 can act on Ub anytime during the chain assembly process. To determine whether phosphorylation occurs on a particular chain type, we performed electron transfer dissociation (ETD) MS/MS analysis on the diGly-pSer65-Ub1–74 species. The ETD data fit nicely with the diGly motif on Lys63 (Figure 1C and Figure S1B), suggesting PINK1 phosphorylates internal subunits of Lys63 chains. These results are consistent with data showing that PINK1 phosphorylates each subunit of well-defined Lys63 chains at a faster rate than other chain types.

Isotopically Labeled Ub Standards for Absolute Quantitation.

In the absence of internal standards, it is difficult to determine how much unmodified and diGly-modified pSer65-Ub is generated relative to the unphosphorylated forms of Ub due to the possibility that pSer65-Ub and Ub have different ionization efficiencies. To assess this, we prepared 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65-Ub with the expectation that these reagents would also allow us to quantify the abundance of each species (Figure S2A).

In a mixture containing a constant background of light (14N-labeled) Ub and pSer65-Ub (Figure S2B), we examined the response to different concentrations of 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65-Ub. LC traces show that all four Ub species have similar retention times using a 15 cm C4 reverse-phase column (Figure 2A). The phosphate group does indeed cause ion suppression, as the total ion count is 5-fold more sensitive to increasing concentrations of 15N-labeled Ub compared to 15N-labeled pSer65-Ub (Figure 2B). Despite these differences, a linear response is observed for both 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65-Ub, indicating the two heavy variants can serve as internal standards.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Ionization efficiency of ubiquitin species. (A) Extracted ion chromatograms of Ub, pSerUb, 15N-Ub, and 15N-pSer Ub shown on the same relative scale with retention times for each. (B) Linear response curves for 15N-Ub (top) and 15N-pSer Ub (bottom) shown with R2 and slope values determined for each linear fit. The solid black lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the average fits of two independent experiments. (C) Middle-down MS of Lys63 Ub2 and pSer65 Lys63 Ub2 with percentages based on the relative abundance of each Ub variant. The spectra correspond to the Ub11+ charge state.

Using synthetic Ub chains, we have already shown that the relative abundance of each truncated Ub variant, as measured by middle-down MS, reflects the ratios of different segments of a chain, that is, the distal cap, the unbranched segment, and the branch point. We confirmed this observation again using Lys63 Ub dimers (di-Ub); intact MS shows a 1:1 ratio of Ub1–74 (the distal subunit) and diGly-Ub1–74 (the proximal subunit). We then asked whether the ratio of unmodified to diGly-modified pSer65-Ub measured by intact MS reflects the actual ratio of each phosphorylated species. Using PINK1 to completely phosphorylate Lys63 di-Ub, we found that diGly-pSer65-Ub1–74 does ionize slightly better than pSer65-Ub1–74, but the ratio is close to 1:1, indicating that a single standard can report on the relative abundance of each species (Figure 2C and Figure S2D).

Quantitation of Parkin Autoubiquitination.

With the ability to quantitate middle-down MS data, we sought to measure the abundance of Ub and pSer65-Ub in their unmodified and modified forms. Instead of analyzing the bulk reaction, we chose to follow the assembly of chains directly on Parkin. Autoubiquitination of Parkin is often used to assess activity,18 and we wanted to minimize the impact of unincorporated mono-Ub on the analysis of chain architecture.

To isolate autoubiquitinated Parkin from reaction mixtures, we performed a two-step purification protocol using Ni-NTA chromatography (Figure 3A). Unanchored Ub chains along with mono-Ub were removed from the HMW conjugates containing Parkin in the first Ni-NTA chromatographic step (Figure 3B). To ensure we only examined chains directly tethered to Parkin, the 6xHis-SUMO tag originally fused to the N-terminus of Parkin was cleaved by TEV, and the resulting autoubiquitinated Parkin products were released from Ni-NTA resin. Immunoblotting with the α-Ub and α-Parkin antibodies shows the elution contains a substantial amount of HMW Ub conjugates along with Parkin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Autoubiquitination of Parkin. (A) General scheme for the assembly and isolation of autoubiquitinated Parkin. Captured Parkin was subjected to minimal trypsinolysis under nondenaturing conditions to yield a variety of Ub species. (B) Western blot analysis of the pulldown from crude reactions using Ni-NTA resin. Autoubiquitinated Parkin was released by incubation with TEV protease overnight. (C) Middle-down MS analysis of autoubiquitinated Parkin after minimal trypsinolysis. The spectra correspond to the Ub11+ charge state and percentages are normalized against the 15N-Ub and 15N-pSer65 Ub standards. (D) Ionization efficiency of 15N-Ub and 15N-pSer65 Ub standards plotted in reference to total Ub detected during Parkin autoubiquitination time course. Quantitation of (E) unphosphorylated and (F) phosphorylated Ub variants produced during Parkin autoubiquitination time course.

Autoubiquitinated Parkin was then isolated at different time points and analyzed by quantitative middle-down MS (Figure 3C). After minimal trypsinolysis, 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65- Ub standards were spiked into each sample to quantify the abundance of each Ub species. The Ub species were then separated from other peptides using a C4 reverse-phase column. As observed with purified light and heavy Ub variants, there is a slight difference in retention time between unphosphorylated and phosphorylated species (ΔRT = 0.2 min) (Figure S3A). Mass spectra were initially processed using Xcalibur Qual Browser v4.2 (Figure S3B). The total ion count of each Ub variant in the 11+ charge state was integrated using a mass tolerance of 20 ppm with Gaussian smoothing of seven points and mass precision of four decimal points. Using this approach, quantitation of unmodified and modified pSer65-Ub is compounded by low charge state peptides (Figure 3C). To overcome this problem, we calculated the relative abundance of Ub variants by summing the peak heights of the most abundant isotopomer, which affords a total ion count. This was achieved using the quantitation node in the Mash Suite program (Figure S3B).42,43

As the autoubiquitination reaction proceeds, the amount of Ub attached to Parkin increases. This increase leads to an overall decrease in ionization of all Ub species (Figure 3D). By adding 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65-Ub standards to samples from individual time points, we are able to accurately quantify the relative abundance of all Ub variants. Each of the unphosphorylated Ub species (i.e., Ub1–74, diGly-Ub1–74, and 2xdiGly-Ub1–74) is observed within the first 5 min of the reaction (Figure 3C,E). After 45 min, Ub1–74 remains the major species, indicating that Parkin primarily monoubiquitinates itself; however, diGly-Ub1–74 and 2xdiGly-Ub1–74 represent ~24 and 9% of the total Ub population, respectively. According to ETD analysis, branch points are composed of Lys6 and Lys48 linkages similar to the bulk reaction (Figure S3C). These results suggest that Lys6/Lys48 branch points are introduced concomitantly with the rest of the chain.

Quantification of phosphorylated Ub variants reveals a slight delay in the formation of diGly-modified pSer65-Ub relative to the unmodified form (Figure 3F). As observed with the unphosphorylated Ub species, unmodified pSer65-Ub is detected at the earliest time point (5 min) and reaches 11% of the total Ub population by 45 min. DiGly-modified pSer65-Ub is not detected until the 15 min time point and only represents 2% of the total Ub population at 45 min of autoubiquitination. These data indicate that Parkin modifies itself with pSer65-Ub, but very little of the phosphorylated species is incorporated into chains. These results are entirely consistent with recent reports that utilized bottom-up methods to determine the architecture of chains built by PINK1 and Parkin both in vitro and in cells such as HeLa and iNeurons.15,3234,45

USP30 Changes the Landscape of Parkin-Derived Ubiquitin Chains.

USP30 is an integral MOM protein thought to oppose the activities of PINK1 and Parkin and therefore acts as a brake during mitophagy.38 Biochemical studies have shown that USP30 prefers to cleave Lys6 Ub chains but is inhibited upon PINK1-mediated phosphorylation of the distal subunit, suggesting USP30 activity diminishes as PINK1 and Parkin reach full activation. Parkin does not just assemble Lys6 chains; Lys11, Lys48, and Lys63 linkages are all products of Parkin.15,32 Yet, how these different chain architectures affect USP30s activity remains unclear.

We therefore monitored PINK1 and Parkin-dependent chain assembly reactions in the presence of different concentrations of USP30. At low concentrations of USP30 (0.2 μM), chain disassembly is only observed at later time points (60 and 120 min) and immunoblotting with the α-pSer65-Ub antibody reveals very little cleavage of the phosphorylated, HMW conjugates (Figure 4A). At higher concentrations (6 μM), chain disassembly is much more robust, but the disassembly of phosphorylated conjugates is still minimal and is only observed at later time points.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Parkin and USP30 ubiquitination reactions. (A) Western blot analysis of Ub chain assembly by Parkin (1.3 μM) or disassembly by varying concentrations of USP30 against the Ub and phosphoUb antibodies. Middle-down MS analysis of a crude Parkin (1.3 μM) reactions (B) without or (C) with the presence of USP30 (1.3 μM). The spectra correspond to the Ub11+ charge state and percentages are normalized against the 15N-Ub and 15N-pSer Ub standards.

Quantitative middle-down MS analysis provides a more detailed look at what is happening during chain assembly in the presence of USP30. Congruent with its ability to dismantle chains, the Ub1–74/diGly-Ub1–74 ratio shifts from ~3:1 in the absence of USP30 to approximately 6:1 in its presence after 1 h (Figure 4B,C). The most significant effect, however, is on the relative abundance of branch points. After 1 h, Lys6/Lys48 branch points (2xdiGly-Ub1–74) comprise 4% of the total Ub population in the absence of USP30. When USP30 is present, branch points are nearly undetectable. These results suggest that Lys6/Lys48 branched chains are particularly susceptible to cleavage by USP30.

We also noticed that the disassembly of unphosphorylated chains by USP30 leads to an enrichment of unmodified pSer65-Ub. This can be seen by comparing the relative abundance of Ub1–74 and pSer65-Ub1–74 at the 30 min time point; the presence of USP30 causes the latter to become the major species (Tables S2 and S3). These data can be rationalized by a scenario in which USP30 continuously replenishes the pool of mono-Ub, providing PINK1 with more substrate.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we report on the quantitative middle-down MS analysis of ubiquitin chains produced by Parkin in the presence and absence of the deubiquitinase USP30. Quantification of both Ub and pSer65-Ub in their unmodified and modified forms is achieved using uniformly, 15N-labeled Ub and pSer65-Ub internal standards. Our results show that Parkin is a prolific chain branching E3 ligase capable of building Lys6/Lys48 branch points. We find that Parkin also attaches pSer65-Ub to itself in the form of a single Ub moiety or at the distal end of a chain. Additionally, we find that when pSer65-Ub is incorporated into a Ub chain, it does so with a Lys63 linkage. In the presence of USP30, branched chains are preferentially lost relative to the ensemble of unbranched chains. Thus, quantitative middle-down MS can be used to inform on the architecture of chains produced by Parkin and how these chains are processed by deubiquitinases such as USP30.

Supplementary Material

Figures S1-S4
Tables S1-S3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the NIH (RO1GM110543 to E.R.S.) and a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (GRFP1451512 to K.K.D.). The data described herein were acquired on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer funded by the NIH grant 1S10OD010645-01A1.00058.

Footnotes

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/jasms.0c00058

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jasms.0c00058.

Figures S1S4 (PDF)

Tables S1S3 (XLSX)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Kirandeep K. Deol, Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts—Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States

Stephen J. Eyles, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts—Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States

Eric R. Strieter, Department of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts—Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States;.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Parkinson’s Foundation. Statistics Who Has Parkinson’s? https://www.parkinson.org/Understanding-Parkinsons/Statistics (accessed 2020-01-07).
  • (2).Kirkinezos IG; Moraes CT Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitochondrial Diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 2001, 12 (6), 449–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Onyango IG Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Parkinson’s Disease. Neurochem. Res 2008, 33 (3), 589–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Subramaniam SR; Chesselet MF Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Parkinson’s Disease. Prog. Neurobiol 2013, 106–107, 17–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Voigt A; Berlemann LA; Winklhofer KF The Mitochondrial Kinase PINK1: Functions beyond Mitophagy. J. Neurochem 2016, 139, 232–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Narendra DP; Jin SM; Tanaka A; Suen DF; Gautier CA; Shen J; Cookson MR; Youle RJ PINK1 Is Selectively Stabilized on Impaired Mitochondria to Activate Parkin. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8 (1), e1000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Sauvé V; Gehring K Phosphorylated Ubiquitin: A New Shade of PINK1 in Parkin Activation. Cell Res. 2014, 24 (9), 1025–1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Kumar A; Tamjar J; Waddell AD; Woodroof HI; Raimi OG; Shaw AM; Peggie M; Muqit MMK; van Aalten DMF Structure of PINK1 and Mechanisms of Parkinson’s Disease-Associated Mutations. eLife 2017, 6, 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Schubert AF; Gladkova C; Pardon E; Wagstaff JL; Freund SMV; Steyaert J; Maslen SL; Komander D Structure of PINK1 in Complex with Its Substrate Ubiquitin. Nature 2017, 552 (7683), 51–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Narendra D; Tanaka A; Suen DF; Youle RJ Parkin Is Recruited Selectively to Impaired Mitochondria and Promotes Their Autophagy. J. Cell Biol 2008, 183 (5), 795–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Sarraf SA; Raman M; Guarani-Pereira V; Sowa ME; Huttlin EL; Gygi SP; Harper JW Landscape of the PARKIN-Dependent Ubiquitylome in Response to Mitochondrial Depolarization. Nature 2013, 496 (7445), 372–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Koyano F; Okatsu K; Kosako H; Tamura Y; Go E; Kimura M; Kimura Y; Tsuchiya H; Yoshihara H; Hirokawa T; Endo T; Fon EA; Trempe J; Saeki Y; Tanaka K; Matsuda N Ubiquitin Is Phosphorylated by PINK1 to Activate Parkin. Nature 2014, 510 (7503), 162–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Kane LA; Lazarou M; Fogel AI; Li Y; Yamano K; Sarraf SA; Banerjee S; Youle RJ PINK1 Phosphorylates Ubiquitin to Activate Parkin E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity. J. Cell Biol 2014, 205 (2), 143–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Kazlauskaite A; Kondapalli C; Gourlay R; Campbell DG; Ritorto MS; Hofmann K; Alessi DR; Knebel A; Trost M; Muqit MMK Parkin Is Activated by PINK1-Dependent Phosphorylation of Ubiquitin at Ser65. Biochem. J 2014, 460 (1), 127–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Ordureau A; Sarraf SA; Duda DM; Heo JM; Jedrychowski MP; Sviderskiy VO; Olszewski JL; Koerber JT; Xie T; Beausoleil SA; Wells JA; Gygi SP; Schulman BA; Harper JW Quantitative Proteomics Reveal a Feedforward Mechanism for Mitochondrial PARKIN Translocation and Ubiquitin Chain Synthesis. Mol. Cell 2014, 56 (3), 360–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Kondapalli C; Kazlauskaite A; Zhang N; Woodroof HI; Campbell DG; Gourlay R; Burchell L; Walden H; MacArtney TJ; Deak M; Knebel A; Alessi DR; Muqit MMK PINK1 Is Activated by Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Depolarization and Stimulates Parkin E3 Ligase Activity by Phosphorylating Serine 65. Open Biol. 2012, 2 (5), 120080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Seirafi M; Kozlov G; Gehring K Parkin Structure and Function. FEBS J. 2015, 282 (11), 2076–2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Wauer T; Simicek M; Schubert A; Komander D Mechanism of Phospho-Ubiquitin-Induced PARKIN Activation. Nature 2015, 524 (7565), 370–374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Sauvé V; Sung G; Soya N; Kozlov G; Blaimschein N; Miotto LS; Trempe J; Lukacs GL; Gehring K Mechanism of Parkin Activation by Phosphorylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2018, 25 (7), 623–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Berndsen CE; Wolberger C New Insights into Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2014, 21 (4), 301–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Wauer T; Komander D Structure of the Human Parkin Ligase Domain in an Autoinhibited State. EMBO J. 2013, 32 (15), 2099–2112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Ham SJ; Lee SY; Song S; Chung J-R; Choi S; Chung J Interaction between RING1 (R1) and the Ubiquitin-like (UBL) Domains Is Critical for the Regulation of Parkin Activity. J. Biol. Chem 2016, 291 (4), 1803–1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Walinda E; Morimoto D; Sugase K; Shirakawa M Dual Function of Phosphoubiquitin in E3 Activation of Parkin. J. Biol. Chem 2016, 291 (32), 16879–16891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Rasool S; Soya N; Truong L; Croteau N; Lukacs GL; Trempe J PINK1 Autophosphorylation Is Required for Ubiquitin Recognition. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19 (4), 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Sauvé V; Lilov A; Seirafi M; Vranas M; Rasool S; Kozlov G; Sprules T; Wang J; Trempe J; Gehring K A Ubl/Ubiquitin Switch in the Activation of Parkin. EMBO J. 2015, 34 (20), 2492–2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Trempe J; Sauvé V; Grenier K; Seirafi M; Tang MY; Meńade M; Al-Abdul-Wahid S; Krett J; Wong K; Kozlov G; Nagar B; Fon EA; Gehring K Structure of Parkin Reveals Mechanisms for Ubiquitin Ligase Activation. Science 2013, 340 (6139), 1451–1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Ordureau A; Heo JM; Duda DM; Paulo JA; Olszewski JL; Yanishevski D; Rinehart J; Schulman BA; Harper JW Defining Roles of PARKIN and Ubiquitin Phosphorylation by PINK1 in Mitochondrial Quality Control Using a Ubiquitin Replacement Strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2015, 112 (21), 6637–6642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Fiesel FC; Moussaud-Lamodière EL; Ando M; Springer W A Specific Subset of E2 Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes Regulate Parkin Activation and Mitophagy Differently. J. Cell Sci 2014, 127 (16), 3488–3504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Lazarou M; Sliter DA; Kane LA; Sarraf SA; Wang C; Burman JL; Sideris DP; Fogel AI; Youle RJ The Ubiquitin Kinase PINK1 Recruits Autophagy Receptors to Induce Mitophagy. Nature 2015, 524 (7565), 309–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Harper JW; Ordureau A; Heo JM Building and Decoding Ubiquitin Chains for Mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2018, 19 (2), 93–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Michel MA; Swatek KN; Hospenthal MK; Komander D Ubiquitin Linkage-Specific Affimers Reveal Insights into K6-Linked Ubiquitin Signaling. Mol. Cell 2017, 68 (1), 233–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Cunningham CN; Baughman JM; Phu L; Tea JS; Yu C; Coons M; Kirkpatrick DS; Bingol B; Corn JE USP30 and Parkin Homeostatically Regulate Atypical Ubiquitin Chains on Mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol 2015, 17 (2), 160–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Ordureau A; Paulo JA; Zhang W; Ahfeldt T; Zhang J; Cohn EF; Hou Z; Heo JM; Rubin LL; Sidhu SS; Gygi SP; Harper JW Dynamics of PARKIN-Dependent Mitochondrial Ubiquitylation in Induced Neurons and Model Systems Revealed by Digital Snapshot Proteomics. Mol. Cell 2018, 70, 211–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Wauer T; Swatek KN; Wagstaff JL; Gladkova C; Pruneda JN; Michel MA; Gersch M; Johnson CM; Freund SM; Komander D Ubiquitin Ser65 Phosphorylation Affects Ubiquitin Structure, Chain Assembly and Hydrolysis. EMBO J. 2015, 34 (3), 307–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Valkevich EM; Sanchez NA; Ge Y; Strieter ER Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry Enables Characterization of Branched Ubiquitin Chains. Biochemistry 2014, 53 (30), 4979–4989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Crowe SO; Rana ASJB; Deol KK; Ge Y; Strieter ER Ubiquitin Chain Enrichment Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry Enables Characterization of Branched Ubiquitin Chains in Cellulo. Anal. Chem 2017, 89 (8), 4428–4434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Rana ASJB; Ge Y; Strieter ER Ubiquitin Chain Enrichment Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry (UbiChEM-MS) Reveals Cell-Cycle Dependent Formation of Lys11/Lys48 Branched Ubiquitin Chains. J. Proteome Res 2017, 16, 3363–3369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Gersch M; Gladkova C; Schubert AF; Michel MA; Maslen S; Komander D Mechanism and Regulation of the Lys6-Selective Deubiquitinase USP30. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 2017, 24 (11), 920–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Pham GH; Rana ASJB; Korkmaz EN; Trang VH; Cui Q; Strieter ER Comparison of Native and Non-Native Ubiquitin Oligomers Reveals Analogous Structures and Reactivities. Protein Sci. 2016, 25, 456–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Marley J; Lu M; Bracken C A Method for Efficient Isotopic Labeling of Recombinant Proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 20 (1), 71–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Xu P; Peng J Characterization of Polyubiquitin Chain Structure by Middle-down Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem 2008, 80 (9), 3438–3444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Guner H; Close PL; Cai W; Zhang H; Peng Y; Gregorich ZR; Ge Y MASH Suite: A User-Friendly and Versatile Software Interface for High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data Interpretation and Visualization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2014, 25 (3), 464–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Cai W; Guner H; Gregorich ZR; Chen AJ; Ayaz-Guner S; Peng Y; Valeja SG; Liu X; Ge Y MASH Suite pro: A Comprehensive Software Tool for Top-down Proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2016, 15 (2), 703–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Swatek KN; Usher JL; Kueck AF; Gladkova C; Mevissen TET; Pruneda JN; Skern T; Komander D Insights into Ubiquitin Chain Architecture Using Ub-Clipping. Nature 2019, 572, 533–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Ordureau A; Paulo JA; Zhang J; An H; Swatek KN; Cannon JR; Wan Q; Komander D; Harper JW Global Landscape and Dynamics of Parkin and USP30-Dependent Ubiquitylomes in INeurons during Mitophagic Signaling. Mol. Cell 2020, 77 (5), 1124–1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figures S1-S4
Tables S1-S3

RESOURCES