Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jul 4;43:270–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.041

Saliva ejector assisted laryngoscopy (SEAL) for protective intubation

Li-Wei Lin a,b,c, Chee-Fah Chong a,b,
PMCID: PMC7334141  PMID: 32631772

To the Editor,

Unprotected endotracheal intubation in suspected or confirmed cases of SARS-CoV2 infection may put healthcare providers at risk of droplet or airborne infections [1,2]. We describe a potential method for reducing provider exposure during intubation using a saliva ejector suction system. This aerosol-reducing method has an easy-to-remember acronym: “SEAL” (saliva ejector assisted laryngoscopy).

A saliva ejector (Fig. 1A) is a tubular device providing suction to remove saliva and debris from the mouth of a dental patient in order to maintain a clear operative field. The ejector is usually curved into a J-shaped configuration before its use. It comprises an inlet (the shorter arm of the J) placed in the mouth cavity and an outlet (the stem of the J) connected to a vacuum source via a flexible hose (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Disposable saliva ejector (Manufacturer: Asa Dental, Italy). (B) Wall-mounted vacuum suction regulator. (C) Water vapor generated with a nebulizer. (D) Vapor removed by the saliva ejector suction system.

In our simulation, airway droplets and aerosols were approximated with water vapor generated at 15 L/min using a conventional nebulizer connected to the airway of a mannequin. A disposable saliva ejector was placed over the left commissure of the mouth with its suction tip positioned in between the soft palate and the tongue. The outlet of the saliva ejector was connected to a wall-mounted vacuum suction regulator (Fig. 1B). When the vacuum source was turned off, vapor was visible from the mouth (Fig. 1C). Once the vacuum was turned on, the vapor was no longer visible (Fig. 1D, Video 1).

In our simulation, airway droplets and aerosols were approximated with water vapor generated at 15 L/min using a conventional nebulizer connected to the airway of a mannequin. A disposable saliva ejector was placed over the left commissure of the mouth with its suction tip positioned in between the soft palate and the tongue. The outlet of the saliva ejector was connected to a wall-mounted vacuum suction regulator (Fig. 1B). When the vacuum source was turned off, vapor was visible from the mouth (Fig. 1C). Once the vacuum was turned on, the vapor was no longer visible (Fig. 1D, Video 1).

Our proposed SEAL technique has some limitations. Though routinely available at dental clinics, the saliva ejector may not be obtainable at some EDs. Normal suction devices are less suitable for similar purpose because they cannot be shaped into the J-configuration of the saliva ejector (to be properly hung over the mouth angle for aerosol suction). Although visible vapor can be reduced in a manikin model, the effectiveness of this technique in reducing COVID-19 exposure is unclear and further studies in the clinical environment are needed prior to its application in practice. The effect of this technique on positive-end expiratory pressure among COVID-19 patients is unclear. Providers should consider avoiding this technique in patients who are dependent on PEEP prior to the intubation.

The following is the supplementary data related to this article.

Video 1

Video demonstrating vapor removal by the saliva ejector suction system.

Download video file (2.2MB, flv)

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.041.

Funding

None declared/NA/not required.

Authorship

  • 1.

    Dr. LW Lin performed and filmed the simulation.

  • 2.

    Dr. CF Chong designed the prototype and wrote the manuscript.

Informed consent

Not required according to the Institutional Review Board of ShinKong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.

Ethical approval

Not required according to the Institutional Review Board of ShinKong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors have no conflict of interest of any kind.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. James DuCanto (Advocate Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) for his invaluable guidance.

References

  • 1.Canelli R., Connor C.W., Gonzalez M., et al. Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1957–1958. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chang D., Xu H., Rebaza A., Sharma L., Dela Cruz C.S. Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30066-7. (Forthcoming) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video 1

Video demonstrating vapor removal by the saliva ejector suction system.

Download video file (2.2MB, flv)

Articles from The American Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES